Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Robust Phantom-Assisted Framework for Multi-Person Localization and Vital Signs Monitoring Using MIMO FMCW Radar

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A multi-person radar pipeline that localizes stationary people in cluttered rooms and estimates respiration and heart rates via joint sparse recovery and harmonic-cancelling dictionary estimation, validated with a thoracic-motion phantom…

desk verdict Solid incremental radar NCVSM paper with a genuinely useful phantom and a sensible harmonics-resilient estimator, but the headline accuracy numbers are not end-to-end because localization is verified separately and vital signs are extracted from true locations. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.06755 v1 pith:3R42UCU7 submitted 2025-01-12 eess.SP

Yonathan Eder , Emma Zagoury , Shlomi Savariego , Moshe Namer , Oded Cohen , Yonina C. Eldar This is my paper · ORCID
classification eess.SP
keywords frequency-modulatedcontinuouswaveradarMIMOmulti-personlocalizationvitalsignsmonitoringjointsparserecoveryrespiratoryharmonicsphantomvalidationnon-contactsensing
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Non-contact radar monitoring of several people at once usually fails in cluttered rooms because static furniture reflections masquerade as people and because respiration harmonics swamp the weak heartbeat signal. This paper argues that both failures can be solved with a single pipeline: localize the thoraces by recovering a jointly sparse range-angle map using a 3D $\ell^2$,1-regularized least-squares problem, then estimate vitals with a dictionary that explicitly subtracts respiration and its harmonics. The claim is supported by a custom hardware phantom that replays recorded thoracic impedance signals, and by human trials. In three-person trials the method reports respiration-rate accuracy of 94.14%, 98.12%, and 98.69% within 2, 3, and 4 breaths per minute, and heart-rate accuracy of 87.10%, 94.12%, and 95.54% within the same thresholds in beats per minute, with average RMSE of 0.98 and 1.33 bpm. If this holds, radar-based vital-sign monitoring becomes credible for waiting rooms and smart-home health sensing.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the joint-sparse bilinear signal model $Y_l = A X_l B + W_l$, in which each frame shares the same unknown support across slow time; RaLU-JSR recovers the sparse tensor $X$ by minimizing a 3D $\ell_{2,1}$-regularized least-squares cost with a fast proximal-gradient acceleration. The second mechanism is the harmonic-resilient dictionary estimator E-VSDR, which builds respiration and heartbeat dictionaries on a 1-bpm grid, estimates respiration by a sparse peak, subtracts the respiration fundamental and all its harmonics that fall in the heartbeat band, and then selects the remaining sparse heartbeat tone. The hardware phantom, three vibration units driven by recorded thoracic impedance signals, functions as a repeatable ground-truth stand-in for human thoraces and was used to tune the algorithm before human trials.

What would settle it

Run the identical pipeline in a room where one of the three seated subjects shifts posture, sways, or briefly stands during the 30-second monitoring window, while the support is fixed from the first five seconds; if heart-rate accuracy within 2 bpm remains above 85%, the robustness claim survives, whereas a sharp drop would show that the claim depends on immobility.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that multi-person vital-sign monitoring by MIMO FMCW radar reduces to two coupled estimation problems that can be solved robustly in clutter: recovering the joint sparse range-angle support of stationary people, and estimating each person's respiration and heartbeat from the phase of the support beamformer while actively cancelling respiration harmonics. Localization is performed once on the first five seconds using RaLU-JSR, which solves for the 3D tensor of complex amplitudes from Y_l = AX_lB + W_l with a joint $\ell^2$,1 penalty across slow-time frames and a vital-frequency clutter filter. Vital signs are then estimated continuously by E-VSDR, an extension of the Vital Signs Dictionary Recovery method that splits the heartbeat band into interfered and non-interfered frequencies using the estimated respiration rate, cancels the harmonics by least squares, and selects the remaining sparse heartbeat tone. The authors report that, in the multi-person human trials, only the proposed localization detected and positioned all three subjects, and the E-VSDR estimator outperformed FFT, phase regression, and orthogonal-projection baselines, with or without the added refinement, in both average success rates and RMSE.

Load-bearing premise

Subjects remain stationary throughout the session, with only their chests moving from breathing and heartbeat, and the locations found in the first five seconds stay valid for all later estimates; the trials also instructed subjects to breathe calmly and avoid large movements.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single in-phase channel can be used for both localization and Doppler extraction, sidestepping I/Q imbalance without sacrificing accuracy.
  • A harmonics-aware dictionary estimator provides heart-rate estimates in multi-person, cluttered settings at roughly 87% success within 2 bpm, a level that makes radar plausible for unsupervised waiting-room monitoring.
  • The phantom provides a repeatable validation path for radar vital-sign systems, so algorithmic parameters can be tuned and claims compared without recruiting human subjects each time.
  • If the reported accuracy holds, continuous monitoring windows of 30 s at 0.05 s intervals can produce stable vital-sign curves over a two-minute session.
  • The localization step needs only five seconds of data, after which continuous monitoring can reuse the fixed support.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The stationary-subject assumption (A-1) is the real boundary of the claimed robustness; a natural extension is online support re-estimation that tracks small posture shifts, and this paper does not yet demonstrate that.
  • The phantom could be reused as a standardized benchmark for other radar sensing tasks, since it generates ground-truth thoracic motion with known cardiopulmonary content, but the paper only demonstrates its use for this pipeline.
  • On populations with irregular breathing patterns or arrhythmias, the harmonic-cancellation step may subtract energy near the true heartbeat; testing E-VSDR against the pathological signals the phantom can replay would settle whether the reported margins persist.
  • The dictionary-based estimator's advantage over FFT baselines should grow as heartbeat-to-noise ratio falls, so the largest performance gap is expected precisely in the noisiest real deployments.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper proposes an end-to-end MIMO FMCW radar pipeline for multi-person localization and non-contact vital sign monitoring. The signal model in Eq. (10) is used to formulate localization as joint-sparse recovery solved by RaLU-JSR (Algorithm 1); the estimated support feeds the beamformer in Eq. (16) to extract thoracic Doppler phases, from which E-VSDR (Algorithm 2) estimates respiration and heart rates using harmonic-resilient dictionary recovery and adaptive temporal refinement. The authors also contribute a custom three-unit hardware phantom driven by recorded impedance signals and validate the pipeline in 12 phantom and 12 human trials. The headline multi-person human results are RR ASR2/3/4 of 94.14/98.12/98.69% and HR ASR2/3/4 of 87.10/94.12/95.54%, with ARMSE of 0.98 and 1.33 bpm.

Significance. The phantom is a genuine experimental contribution: it provides a repeatable, controllable testbed with realistic cardiopulmonary waveforms and was used to tune the algorithm before human experiments. The algorithmic ideas, especially the joint-sparse localization and dictionary-based harmonics suppression, are plausible, and the head-to-head comparison with six existing methods is a useful benchmark. If the full pipeline were validated end-to-end, the work would advance practical radar-based monitoring of multiple stationary people in cluttered indoor settings. At present, however, the strongest numerical claims are conditional on oracle localization, and the localization evidence is qualitative; the significance of the results therefore depends on completing the end-to-end evaluation.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section V-C, Table III] The reported NCVSM metrics are not end-to-end. The text explicitly states that, for a fair comparison, all subjects were assumed to be accurately detected and positioned, and that the extracted thoracic vibrations used the true locations. Consequently, the headline ASR and ARMSE values in Table III validate E-VSDR conditional on perfect localization, not the full RaLU-JSR plus E-VSDR framework promised in the abstract and title. Since the beamformer in Eq. (16) depends directly on the support estimate, an off-by-one bin in the RaLU-JSR support could degrade the vital-sign estimates. Please add an end-to-end evaluation in which the support produced by Algorithm 1 is used in Eq. (16), and report the resulting ASR/RMSE; alternatively, if conditional results are intended, restrict the abstract and conclusion claims accordingly.
  2. [Section V-B, Figs. 8 and 11] Localization success is asserted on the basis of illustrative maps from one multi-person phantom trial and one multi-person human trial, with statements such as 'only the proposed RaLU-JSR detects and positions all 3 subjects.' No detection rate, false-alarm rate, or position RMSE is reported across the 12 trials. This is load-bearing because localization errors propagate directly into the beamformer in Eq. (16) and therefore into the vital-sign estimates. Please report quantitative localization metrics over all trials, including per-trial detection/position errors, and discuss sensitivity to the peak-detection thresholds and to the regularization parameter gamma.
  3. [Section II-B, A-1; Section V-A] The framework assumes that monitored individuals remain stationary, with only slight thoracic movements, and the human protocol asked subjects to breathe calmly and avoid large movements. Because the support is recovered once from the first five seconds and then used in a fixed beamformer, any body sway or repositioning breaks the joint-support assumption. The abstract's 'real-world, cluttered environments' and the term 'robust' therefore overstate the validated scope. Either add experiments with natural body movement or explicitly state in the abstract and conclusion that the results apply to stationary subjects.
  4. [Table III, Figs. 10 and 13] The multi-person human results are based on nine subjects (three trials of three subjects), and the reported ASR and ARMSE values are point estimates with no confidence intervals or per-trial variability. Differences such as the HR ASR2 gap between E-VSDR (87.10%) and PhaseReg+ (71.58%) could, with this sample size, be subject to considerable sampling variability. Please provide per-trial results and confidence intervals (e.g., bootstrap or per-subject standard deviations) for the headline metrics, or present the uncertainty explicitly.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (13)] The expression for the vital-based spectral filter is dimensionally ambiguous: Pi is described as a length-L window, but it is multiplied elementwise with the L-by-N matrix F_L Y^(k)^T. Please specify the intended broadcasting or define Pi as a matrix.
  2. [Section III-A] The indexing of matrix B is inconsistent: Eq. (5) and Eq. (10) define B(p,k), while the text after Eq. (12) writes B(k,p) = exp(...). Please align the notation.
  3. [Section V-A] The supplementary material containing the single-person trial results is referenced but is not included with this submission; please make it available or summarize the single-person results in the main text.
  4. [Section V-D] The claim of 'angular error of less than 3 degrees' for the illustrated phantom trial should be accompanied by a description of how the angular error is measured and by the corresponding values for the other trials.
  5. [General] There are minor typographical and caption errors, including 'corrspondingly' in Section III-B and 'produces' in the caption of Fig. 8; a careful proofread would improve presentation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation chain found; the oracle-localization NCVSM evaluation is a validation gap, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The claimed derivation is self-contained against external benchmarks. The signal model (Section II, Eq. (10)) is a standard MIMO-FMCW beat-signal model; RaLU-JSR (Eq. (14)) is an l2,1-regularized least-squares recovery with known dictionaries A and B; E-VSDR (Eqs. (23)-(26)) estimates RR and HR by dictionary correlations with physiological bands, followed by harmonic subtraction. Nothing in these equations is defined in terms of the outputs. The reported accuracies are validated against contact-sensor ground truth (ECG, PPG, respiration belt) in human trials and impedance/ECG references in phantom trials. The adaptive refinement (Section III-D3) does center search bands on previous estimates, but the updated estimates are still obtained by correlation with the observed vibrations; this is feedback/smoothing, not an identity. The self-citations to [18], [19] supply the base model and VSDR, but the paper's own extension and experiments provide independent evidence; no uniqueness theorem or self-citation is invoked to force the result. Flagged limitation: Section V-C states 'we assume that all considered subjects were accurately detected and positioned' and uses true locations for the NCVSM comparison; this means Table III numbers are not end-to-end localization-plus-estimation results, but this is a validation-scope gap, not a circular reduction of the prediction to its inputs.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical or mathematical entities are postulated. The phantom is a physical testbed, not a theoretical construct. The main burden is carried by the stationarity and sparse-support assumptions, the exact integer-harmonic model, and the several hand-set hyperparameters.

free parameters (5)
  • regularization parameter gamma = 100
    Weight of the 3D l2,1 penalty in RaLU-JSR objective (14); selected based on phantom trials, controls the sparsity and localization outcome.
  • peak detection thresholds for localization = 0.1 in range, 0.4 in angle (normalized power)
    Thresholds for support estimation from the averaged range-angle map (Section V-B); hand chosen, not derived, and likely tuned to the reported trials.
  • refinement parameters = T_ref=5 s, T_avg_H=3 s, T_avg_R=5 s, epsilon_H=epsilon_R=5 bpm
    Smoothing window lengths and adaptive band margins in Section III-D3; hand selected and applied to all trials.
  • vital frequency bands = B_R=[0.1,0.5] Hz, B_H=[0.83,1.67] Hz
    Assumed resting ranges used in the vital filter (13) and the dictionaries (19); choices affect all localization and NCVSM results.
  • angle grid spacing = 1 degree
    Spacing for the angle dictionary B in (12); sets the dictionary size and angular resolution of the localization grid.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption A-1: Monitored individuals remain stationary with only slight thoracic movement from cardiopulmonary activity.
    States that support is fixed across frames; entered in Section II-B and essential for the once-only localization and subsequent beamforming.
  • domain assumption A-2: The number of objects U is much smaller than the product M*P, so the matrices X_l are U-sparse with joint support.
    Justifies the joint sparse recovery problem (14); Section II-B.
  • domain assumption Thoracic vibration is modeled as a sum of Q cosines with unknown amplitudes and frequencies, and respiration/heartbeat bands do not overlap.
    Signal model in (7)-(8) and dictionary model in (18)-(19); the non-overlap is used to separate RR and HR estimates.
  • domain assumption Respiration harmonics in the heartbeat band are exact integer multiples of the respiration fundamental.
    Equation (20) defines the interfering harmonics; the HR estimate depends on subtracting these exactly.
  • standard math Additive zero-mean i.i.d. complex Gaussian noise.
    Used to justify the least-squares and FISTA-based solver; Section II-A.
  • domain assumption TDM creates a perfect virtual SIMO array with orthogonal transmitters.
    Used to extend the SIMO model to MIMO ULA; Section II-B.
  • domain assumption Ground truth references from impedance, ECG, belt, and PPG signals processed via DFT accurately represent true RR and HR.
    The reported accuracy percentages are relative to these references; Section V-A and V-C.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Robust Phantom-Assisted Framework for Multi-Person Localization and Vital Signs Monitoring Using MIMO FMCW Radar." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3R42UCU7

@misc{pith2026250106755,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Robust Phantom-Assisted Framework for Multi-Person Localization and Vital Signs Monitoring Using MIMO FMCW Radar},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3R42UCU7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.06755}
}
read the original abstract

With the rising prevalence of cardiovascular and respiratory disorders and an aging global population, healthcare systems face increasing pressure to adopt efficient, non-contact vital sign monitoring (NCVSM) solutions. This study introduces a robust framework for multi-person localization and vital signs monitoring, using multiple-input-multiple-output frequency-modulated continuous wave radar, addressing challenges in real-world, cluttered environments. Two key contributions are presented. First, a custom hardware phantom was developed to simulate multi-person NCVSM scenarios, utilizing recorded thoracic impedance signals to replicate realistic cardiopulmonary dynamics. The phantom's design facilitates repeatable and rapid validation of radar systems and algorithms under diverse conditions to accelerate deployment in human monitoring. Second, aided by the phantom, we designed a robust algorithm for multi-person localization utilizing joint sparsity and cardiopulmonary properties, alongside harmonics-resilient dictionary-based vital signs estimation, to mitigate interfering respiration harmonics. Additionally, an adaptive signal refinement procedure is introduced to enhance the accuracy of continuous NCVSM by leveraging the continuity of the estimates. Performance was validated and compared to existing techniques through 12 phantom trials and 12 human trials, including both single- and multi-person scenarios, demonstrating superior localization and NCVSM performance. For example, in multi-person human trials, our method achieved average respiration rate estimation accuracies of 94.14%, 98.12%, and 98.69% within error thresholds of 2, 3, and 4 breaths per minute, respectively, and heart rate accuracies of 87.10%, 94.12%, and 95.54% within the same thresholds. These results highlight the potential of this framework for reliable multi-person NCVSM in healthcare and IoT applications.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.06755 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. A schematic illustration of the main components of a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. An illustration of the outcome of a TDM technique, [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Block diagram of the proposed algorithm for robust multi-person localization and vital signs monitoring using SIMO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Illustration of the spectral components of respiration [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Example of impedance signal from [44] that was used to generate realistic mechanical displacements for the vibration unit corresponding to changes in human thoracic volume. (a) (b) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Block diagrams of the developed phantom. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Experimental setups in a cluttered demonstration room. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Localization maps of multi-person phantom trial - class c [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: NCVSM of 3 subjects for multi-person phantom trial - class c3, trial #2. Rows: Subjects 1-3. Columns: Extracted thoracic vibrations v1-v3 for some Tint, PhaseReg [40], FFT [13]–[15], OrthProj [36] and the refined versions PhaseReg+, FFT+, and OrthProj+. The rightmost p…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: NCVSM performance plots for multi-person phantom trials c [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Localization maps of multi-person human trial - class c [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: NCVSM of 3 subjects for multi-person human trial - class c4, trial #3. Rows: Subjects 1-3. Columns: Extracted thoracic vibrations v1-v3 for some Tint, PhaseReg [40], FFT [13]–[15], OrthProj [36] and the refined versions PhaseReg+, FFT+, and OrthProj+. The rightmost pl…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: NCVSM performance plots for multi-person human trials c [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_13.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. SpiRadar: Radar-Based Non-Contact Spirometry via Sparse Polynomial Framework

    eess.SP 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    A radar-only system reconstructs spirometry volume curves and detects bronchodilator response in children without per-subject calibration, achieving FVC correlation 0.902 and 89.5% BDR classification accuracy on 58 trials.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [18]

    Sparsity-based multi-person non-contact vital signs monitoring via fmcw radar,

    Y . Eder and Y . C. Eldar, “Sparsity-based multi-person non-contact vital signs monitoring via fmcw radar,” IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, vol. 27, no. 6, pp. 2806–2817, 2023

    work page 2023

  2. [1]

    The value of vital sign trends in predicting and monitoring clinical de- terioration: A systematic review,

    I. J. Brekke, L. H. Puntervoll, P. B. Pedersen, J. Kellett, and M. Brabrand, “The value of vital sign trends in predicting and monitoring clinical de- terioration: A systematic review,” PloS one, vol. 14, no. 1, p. e0210875, 2019

    work page 2019

  3. [2]

    Electrode studies for the long-term ambula- tory ecg,

    N. Thakor and J. Webster, “Electrode studies for the long-term ambula- tory ecg,” Medical and Biological Engineering and Computing , vol. 23, pp. 116–121, 1985

    work page 1985

  4. [3]

    Automated, multiparametric monitoring of respiratory biomarkers and vital signs in clinical and home settings for covid-19 patients,

    X. Ni, W. Ouyang, H. Jeong, J.-T. Kim, A. Tzavelis, A. Mirzazadeh, C. Wu, J. Y . Lee, M. Keller, C. K. Mummidisetty et al. , “Automated, multiparametric monitoring of respiratory biomarkers and vital signs in clinical and home settings for covid-19 patients,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences , vol. 118, no. 19, p. e2026610118, 2021

    work page 2021

  5. [4]

    Future systems for remote health care,

    S. Brownsell, G. Williams, D. A. Bradley, R. Bragg, P. Catlin, and J. Car- lier, “Future systems for remote health care,” Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 141–152, 1999

    work page 1999

  6. [5]

    Wireless house calls: using communications technology for health care and monitoring,

    O. Boric-Lubeke and V . M. Lubecke, “Wireless house calls: using communications technology for health care and monitoring,” IEEE Microwave Magazine, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 43–48, 2002

    work page 2002

  7. [6]

    Health technology assessment review: Remote monitoring of vital signs-current status and future challenges,

    V . Nangalia, D. R. Prytherch, and G. B. Smith, “Health technology assessment review: Remote monitoring of vital signs-current status and future challenges,” Critical Care, vol. 14, pp. 1–8, 2010

    work page 2010

  8. [7]

    Psychoso- cial factors and mental work load: a reality perceived by nurses in intensive care units,

    P. Ceballos-V ´asquez, G. Rolo-Gonz ´alez, E. H ´ernandez-Fernaud, D. D´ıaz-Cabrera, T. Paravic-Klijn, and M. Burgos-Moreno, “Psychoso- cial factors and mental work load: a reality perceived by nurses in intensive care units,” Revista latino-americana de enfermagem , vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 315–322, 2015

    work page 2015

Show all 62 references
  1. [8]

    Radar for health care: Rec- ognizing human activities and monitoring vital signs,

    F. Fioranelli, J. Le Kernec, and S. A. Shah, “Radar for health care: Rec- ognizing human activities and monitoring vital signs,” IEEE Potentials, vol. 38, no. 4, pp. 16–23, 2019

    2019

  2. [9]

    A health monitoring system for vital signs using iot,

    K. N. Swaroop, K. Chandu, R. Gorrepotu, and S. Deb, “A health monitoring system for vital signs using iot,” Internet of Things , vol. 5, pp. 116–129, 2019

    2019

  3. [10]

    A ka-band low power doppler radar system for remote detection of cardiopulmonary motion,

    Y . Xiao, J. Lin, O. Boric-Lubecke, and V . M. Lubecke, “A ka-band low power doppler radar system for remote detection of cardiopulmonary motion,” in 2005 IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology 27th Annual Conference. IEEE, 2006, pp. 7151–7154

    2005

  4. [11]

    Accurate respiration measurement using dc-coupled continuous-wave radar sensor for motion-adaptive cancer radiotherapy,

    C. Gu, R. Li, H. Zhang, A. Y . Fung, C. Torres, S. B. Jiang, and C. Li, “Accurate respiration measurement using dc-coupled continuous-wave radar sensor for motion-adaptive cancer radiotherapy,” IEEE Transac- tions on biomedical engineering , vol. 59, no. 11, pp. 3117–3123, 2012

    2012

  5. [12]

    A noncontact breathing disorder recognition system using 2.4- ghz digital-if doppler radar,

    H. Zhao, H. Hong, D. Miao, Y . Li, H. Zhang, Y . Zhang, C. Li, and X. Zhu, “A noncontact breathing disorder recognition system using 2.4- ghz digital-if doppler radar,” IEEE journal of biomedical and health informatics, vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 208–217, 2018

    2018

  6. [13]

    Remote monitoring of human vital signs using mm-wave fmcw radar,

    M. Alizadeh, G. Shaker, J. C. M. De Almeida, P. P. Morita, and S. Safavi- Naeini, “Remote monitoring of human vital signs using mm-wave fmcw radar,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 54 958–54 968, 2019

    2019

  7. [14]

    An fmcw radar for localization and vital signs measurement for different chest orientations,

    G. Sacco, E. Piuzzi, E. Pittella, and S. Pisa, “An fmcw radar for localization and vital signs measurement for different chest orientations,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 12, p. 3489, 2020

    2020

  8. [15]

    Cardiopulmonary activity monitoring using millimeter wave radars,

    E. Antolinos, F. Garc ´ıa-Rial, C. Hern´andez, D. Montesano, J. I. Godino- Llorente, and J. Grajal, “Cardiopulmonary activity monitoring using millimeter wave radars,” Remote Sensing, vol. 12, no. 14, p. 2265, 2020

    2020

  9. [16]

    Low-complexity joint extrapolation-music-based 2-d parameter estimator for vital fmcw radar,

    S. Kim and K.-K. Lee, “Low-complexity joint extrapolation-music-based 2-d parameter estimator for vital fmcw radar,” IEEE sensors journal , vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 2205–2216, 2018

    2018

  10. [17]

    Vital sign monitoring using fmcw radar in various sleeping scenarios,

    E. Turppa, J. M. Kortelainen, O. Antropov, and T. Kiuru, “Vital sign monitoring using fmcw radar in various sleeping scenarios,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 22, p. 6505, 2020

    2020

  11. [19]

    Sparse non-contact multiple people localization and vital signs monitoring via fmcw radar,

    Y . Eder, Z. Liu, and Y . C. Eldar, “Sparse non-contact multiple people localization and vital signs monitoring via fmcw radar,” inICASSP 2023- 2023 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–5. 16

    2023

  12. [20]

    Through-wall multi-subject localiza- tion and vital signs monitoring using uwb mimo imaging radar,

    Z. Li, T. Jin, Y . Dai, and Y . Song, “Through-wall multi-subject localiza- tion and vital signs monitoring using uwb mimo imaging radar,” Remote Sensing, vol. 13, no. 15, p. 2905, 2021

    2021

  13. [21]

    Multitarget vital signs measurement with chest motion imaging based on mimo radar,

    C. Feng, X. Jiang, M.-G. Jeong, H. Hong, C.-H. Fu, X. Yang, E. Wang, X. Zhu, and X. Liu, “Multitarget vital signs measurement with chest motion imaging based on mimo radar,”IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 69, no. 11, pp. 4735–4747, 2021

    2021

  14. [22]

    Distributed mimo cw radar for locating multiple people and detecting their vital signs,

    P.-H. Juan, C.-Y . Chueh, and F.-K. Wang, “Distributed mimo cw radar for locating multiple people and detecting their vital signs,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques , vol. 71, no. 3, pp. 1312–1325, 2022

    2022

  15. [23]

    Multiperson localization and vital signs estimation using mmwave mimo radar,

    C.-H. Hsieh and P.-H. Tseng, “Multiperson localization and vital signs estimation using mmwave mimo radar,” IEEE Transactions on Mi- crowave Theory and Techniques , 2024

    2024

  16. [24]

    Signal processing for tdm mimo fmcw millimeter-wave radar sensors,

    X. Li, X. Wang, Q. Yang, and S. Fu, “Signal processing for tdm mimo fmcw millimeter-wave radar sensors,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 167 959– 167 971, 2021

    2021

  17. [25]

    Simultaneous monitoring of multiple people’s vital sign leveraging a single phased-mimo radar,

    Z. Xu, C. Shi, T. Zhang, S. Li, Y . Yuan, C.-T. M. Wu, Y . Chen, and A. Petropulu, “Simultaneous monitoring of multiple people’s vital sign leveraging a single phased-mimo radar,” IEEE Journal of Electromag- netics, RF and Microwaves in Medicine and Biology , vol. 6, no. 3, pp...

    2022

  18. [26]

    Enabling robust radar-based localization and vital signs monitoring in multipath propagation environments,

    M. Mercuri, Y . Lu, S. Polito, F. Wieringa, Y .-H. Liu, A.-J. van der Veen, C. Van Hoof, and T. Torfs, “Enabling robust radar-based localization and vital signs monitoring in multipath propagation environments,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering , vol. 68, no. 11, pp...

    2021

  19. [27]

    Radar-based monitoring of vital signs: A tutorial overview,

    G. Paterniani, D. Sgreccia, A. Davoli, G. Guerzoni, P. Di Viesti, A. C. Valenti, M. Vitolo, G. M. Vitetta, and G. Boriani, “Radar-based monitoring of vital signs: A tutorial overview,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 111, no. 3, pp. 277–317, 2023

    2023

  20. [28]

    Vital-sign monitoring and spatial tracking of multiple people using a contactless radar-based sensor,

    M. Mercuri, I. R. Lorato, Y .-H. Liu, F. Wieringa, C. V . Hoof, and T. Torfs, “Vital-sign monitoring and spatial tracking of multiple people using a contactless radar-based sensor,” Nature Electronics, vol. 2, no. 6, pp. 252–262, 2019

    2019

  21. [29]

    Compensation of quadrature imbal- ance in an optical qpsk coherent receiver,

    I. Fatadin, S. J. Savory, and D. Ives, “Compensation of quadrature imbal- ance in an optical qpsk coherent receiver,” IEEE Photonics Technology Letters, vol. 20, no. 20, pp. 1733–1735, 2008

    2008

  22. [30]

    Compensation of receiver iq imbalance in mm-wave hybrid beamforming systems,

    R. Mahendra, S. K. Mohammed, and R. K. Mallik, “Compensation of receiver iq imbalance in mm-wave hybrid beamforming systems,” in 2020 IEEE 92nd Vehicular Technology Conference (VTC2020-Fall) . IEEE, 2020, pp. 1–6

    2020

  23. [31]

    Vital signs monitoring of multiple people using a fmcw millimeter-wave sensor,

    A. Ahmad, J. C. Roh, D. Wang, and A. Dubey, “Vital signs monitoring of multiple people using a fmcw millimeter-wave sensor,” in 2018 IEEE Radar Conference (RadarConf18) . IEEE, 2018, pp. 1450–1455

    2018

  24. [32]

    Experiments with mmwave automotive radar test-bed,

    X. Gao, G. Xing, S. Roy, and H. Liu, “Experiments with mmwave automotive radar test-bed,” in2019 53rd Asilomar conference on signals, systems, and computers . IEEE, 2019, pp. 1–6

    2019

  25. [33]

    Detection and localization of multiple humans based on curve length of i/q signal trajectory using mimo fmcw radar,

    K. Han and S. Hong, “Detection and localization of multiple humans based on curve length of i/q signal trajectory using mimo fmcw radar,” IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters , vol. 31, no. 4, pp. 413–416, 2021

    2021

  26. [34]

    Experimental evaluation of estimating living-body direction using array antenna for multipath environment,

    K. Konno, M. Nango, N. Honma, K. Nishimori, N. Takemura, and T. Mitsui, “Experimental evaluation of estimating living-body direction using array antenna for multipath environment,” IEEE Antennas and Wireless Propagation Letters, vol. 13, pp. 718–721, 2014

    2014

  27. [35]

    Low-complexity music- based direction-of-arrival detection algorithm for frequency-modulated continuous-wave vital radar,

    B.-s. Kim, Y . Jin, J. Lee, and S. Kim, “Low-complexity music- based direction-of-arrival detection algorithm for frequency-modulated continuous-wave vital radar,” Sensors, vol. 20, no. 15, p. 4295, 2020

    2020

  28. [36]

    Vital signs detection with difference beamforming and orthogonal projection filter based on simo-fmcw radar,

    J. Xiong, H. Hong, L. Xiao, E. Wang, and X. Zhu, “Vital signs detection with difference beamforming and orthogonal projection filter based on simo-fmcw radar,” IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, vol. 71, no. 1, pp. 83–92, 2022

    2022

  29. [37]

    Multi-target vital signs detection using frequency-modulated continuous wave radar,

    Y . Wang, Y . Shui, X. Yang, Z. Li, and W. Wang, “Multi-target vital signs detection using frequency-modulated continuous wave radar,” EURASIP Journal on Advances in Signal Processing , vol. 2021, pp. 1–19, 2021

    2021

  30. [38]

    Driver vital signs monitoring using millimeter wave radio,

    F. Wang, X. Zeng, C. Wu, B. Wang, and K. R. Liu, “Driver vital signs monitoring using millimeter wave radio,” IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 9, no. 13, pp. 11 283–11 298, 2021

    2021

  31. [39]

    Arctangent demod- ulation with dc offset compensation in quadrature doppler radar receiver systems,

    B.-K. Park, O. Boric-Lubecke, and V . M. Lubecke, “Arctangent demod- ulation with dc offset compensation in quadrature doppler radar receiver systems,” IEEE transactions on Microwave theory and techniques , vol. 55, no. 5, pp. 1073–1079, 2007

    2007

  32. [40]

    Smart homes that monitor breathing and heart rate,

    F. Adib, H. Mao, Z. Kabelac, D. Katabi, and R. C. Miller, “Smart homes that monitor breathing and heart rate,” in Proceedings of the 33rd annual ACM conference on human factors in computing systems, 2015, pp. 837– 846

    2015

  33. [41]

    Compact millimeter-wave sensor for remote monitoring of vital signs,

    S. Bakhtiari, T. W. Elmer, N. M. Cox, N. Gopalsami, A. C. Raptis, S. Liao, I. Mikhelson, and A. V . Sahakian, “Compact millimeter-wave sensor for remote monitoring of vital signs,” IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement , vol. 61, no. 3, pp. 830–841, 2011

    2011

  34. [42]

    A programmable robotic phantom to simulate the dynamic respiratory motions of humans for continuous identity authentication,

    S. M. M. Islam, B. Tomota, A. Sylvester, and V . M. Lubecke, “A programmable robotic phantom to simulate the dynamic respiratory motions of humans for continuous identity authentication,” in 2019 IEEE Asia-Pacific Microwave Conference (APMC) . IEEE, 2019, pp. 1408– 1410

    2019

  35. [43]

    Investi- gation of mmwave radar technology for non-contact vital sign monitor- ing,

    S. Marty, F. Pantanella, A. Ronco, K. Dheman, and M. Magno, “Investi- gation of mmwave radar technology for non-contact vital sign monitor- ing,” in 2023 IEEE International Symposium on Medical Measurements and Applications (MeMeA) . IEEE, 2023, pp. 1–6

    2023

  36. [44]

    A dataset of clinically recorded radar vital signs with synchronised reference sensor signals,

    S. Schellenberger, K. Shi, T. Steigleder, A. Malessa, F. Michler, L. Hameyer, N. Neumann, F. Lurz, R. Weigel, C. Ostgathe et al. , “A dataset of clinically recorded radar vital signs with synchronised reference sensor signals,” Scientific data, vol. 7, no. 1, p. 291, 2020

    2020

  37. [45]

    The fundamentals of millimeter wave sensors,

    C. Iovescu and S. Rao, “The fundamentals of millimeter wave sensors,” Texas Instruments, pp. 1–8, 2017

    2017

  38. [46]

    Multivariate locally weighted least squares regression,

    D. Ruppert and M. P. Wand, “Multivariate locally weighted least squares regression,” The annals of statistics , pp. 1346–1370, 1994

    1994

  39. [47]

    Rapid quantum image scanning microscopy by joint sparse reconstruction,

    U. Rossman, R. Tenne, O. Solomon, I. Kaplan-Ashiri, T. Dadosh, Y . C. Eldar, and D. Oron, “Rapid quantum image scanning microscopy by joint sparse reconstruction,” Optica, vol. 6, no. 10, pp. 1290–1296, 2019

    2019

  40. [48]

    A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algo- rithm for linear inverse problems,

    A. Beck and M. Teboulle, “A fast iterative shrinkage-thresholding algo- rithm for linear inverse problems,” SIAM journal on imaging sciences , vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 183–202, 2009

    2009

  41. [49]

    D. P. Palomar and Y . C. Eldar, Convex optimization in signal processing and communications. Cambridge university press, 2010

    2010

  42. [50]

    Analysis of cfar techniques,

    A. Jalil, H. Yousaf, and M. I. Baig, “Analysis of cfar techniques,” in 2016 13th International Bhurban Conference on Applied Sciences and Technology (IBCAST). IEEE, 2016, pp. 654–659

    2016

  43. [51]

    Impedance pneumography: Noise as signal in impedance cardiography,

    J. M. Ernst, D. A. Litvack, D. L. Lozano, J. T. Cacioppo, and G. G. Berntson, “Impedance pneumography: Noise as signal in impedance cardiography,” Psychophysiology, vol. 36, no. 3, pp. 333–338, 1999

    1999

  44. [52]

    Methodological guidelines for impedance cardiography,

    A. Sherwood, M. T. Allen, J. Fahrenberg, R. M. Kelsey, W. R. Lovallo, and L. J. Van Doornen, “Methodological guidelines for impedance cardiography,” Psychophysiology, vol. 27, no. 1, pp. 1–23, 1990

    1990

  45. [53]

    Pathophysiology and treatment of cheyne-stokes respi- ration,

    M. Naughton, “Pathophysiology and treatment of cheyne-stokes respi- ration,” Thorax, vol. 53, no. 6, pp. 514–518, 1998

    1998

  46. [54]

    Arduino Nano Hardware Documentation,

    Arduino Documentation, “Arduino Nano Hardware Documentation,”

  47. [55]

    Vibration Generator: For Investigating Oscillations and Resonances,

    3B Scientific, “Vibration Generator: For Investigating Oscillations and Resonances,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.3bscientific. com/il/vibration-generator-for-investigating- \protect\penalty-\ @Moscillations-and-resonances-1000701-u56001-3b-scientific,p 576 1977.html

    2024

  48. [56]

    Chladni Plate, Circular: For Generating Acoustically Excited Chladni Figures,

    3B Scientific (2), “Chladni Plate, Circular: For Generating Acoustically Excited Chladni Figures,”

  49. [57]

    g.HIamp - 256-Channel Biosignal Amplifier,

    g.tec medical engineering GmbH, “g.HIamp - 256-Channel Biosignal Amplifier,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.gtec.at/product/ g-hiamp-256-channel-biosignal-amplifier/

    2024

  50. [58]

    Available: https://www.3bscientific

    [Online]. Available: https://www.3bscientific. com/il/chladni-plate-circular-for-generating- \protect\penalty-\ @Macoustically-excited-chladni-figures-1000705-u56005-3b-scientific, p 576 1981.html

    1981

  51. [59]

    IWR1443BOOST: mmWave Sensor Evaluation Module,

    Texas Instruments, “IWR1443BOOST: mmWave Sensor Evaluation Module,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.ti.com/tool/ IWR1443BOOST

    2024

  52. [60]

    Body Sensors: Wireless and Wearable Sensors for Physiological Signals,

    g.tec medical engineering GmbH (2), “Body Sensors: Wireless and Wearable Sensors for Physiological Signals,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.gtec.at/product/body-sensors/

    2024

  53. [62]

    DCA1000EVM: mmWave Data Capture Card Evaluation Module,

    Texas Instruments (2), “DCA1000EVM: mmWave Data Capture Card Evaluation Module,” 2024. [Online]. Available: https://www.ti.com/tool/ DCA1000EVM 17 Yonathan Eder (Graduate Student Member, IEEE) received the B.Sc. and M.Sc. degrees in electrical and computer engineering from the...

    2013

  54. [2024]

    Available: https://docs.arduino.cc/hardware/nano/

    [Online]. Available: https://docs.arduino.cc/hardware/nano/

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.