Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 4 minor 36 references

Multilayered fluid-structure interactions: existence of weak solutions for time-periodic and initial-value problems

T0 review · 4 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Under small time-periodic Bernoulli pressure, the 3D fluid–shell–solid blood-vessel model admits at least one time-periodic weak solution.

desk verdict First 3D/2D/3D time-periodic FSI existence result, but the Galerkin equivalence at the heart of the proof is asserted without proof and looks algebraically suspect. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.06820 v1 pith:7I4O2HQ7 submitted 2025-01-12 math.AP

Claudiu Mîndrilă , Arnab Roy This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35Q3074F1035B1035D30
keywords fluid-structureinteractiontime-periodicweaksolutionsviscoelasticityKoitershellNavier-StokesequationsBernoullipressureboundaryconditionsGalerkinmethodfixed-pointmethods
topics Navier-Stokes Regularity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to prove existence of time-periodic weak solutions for a multilayered fluid-structure interaction model shaped like a blood-vessel segment: a viscous incompressible fluid fills a cylindrical tube, a thin elastic shell covers the tube wall, and a thick elastic solid surrounds the shell. The system is driven only by the pressure condition $p+\frac12|u|^2=P_{\mathrm{in/out}}(t)$ on the inlet and outlet, with the prescribed pressure periodic in time. The main theorem asserts that if the $L^2$-norm of $P_{\mathrm{in/out}}$ is sufficiently small, at least one time-periodic weak solution $(u,\eta,d)$ exists and satisfies a uniform energy bound. The decisive hypothesis is viscoelasticity in the thick solid: the damping term injects $|\nabla\partial_t d|^2$ into the dissipation and thereby produces the diffusion estimate needed for periodic energy control. Without that damping, the same framework still yields a local-in-time weak solution for the initial-value problem, extending earlier 2D/1D/2D results to the 3D/2D/3D geometry.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the energy balance $\frac{d}{dt}\mathcal E(t)+\mathcal D(t)=\pm P_{\mathrm{in/out}}(t)\int_{\Gamma_{\mathrm{in/out}}}u\cdot n\,dA$, together with the divergence-free extension operator $F_\delta(\xi)$ of Proposition 3.1, which maps a thin-shell displacement test function $\xi$ into a fluid test function with trace $\xi e_r$ and satisfies the norm estimates (3.2)-(3.4). The viscoelastic term $\delta\partial_t d$ in the Lamé stress (1.9) places $|\nabla\partial_t d|^2$ inside the dissipation $\mathcal D(t)$, which is what makes the time-integrated diffusion estimate (3.19) possible under periodicity. Smallness of $P_{\mathrm{in/out}}$ then converts the energy inequality into the uniform bound (3.31); the Galerkin system (5.7) is solved by a finite-dimensional Leray-Schauder fixed point, and passing to the limit uses the $L^2$-compactness of the fluid velocity established in Section 4.

What would settle it

Write out the Galerkin systems (5.6) and (5.7) for a one-mode ansatz and compare the resulting ODEs: if they are not identical, the claimed equivalence in Section 5.1.1 fails and the fixed-point proof no longer targets the original weak formulation; alternatively, a numerical search over small periodic $P_{\mathrm{in/out}}$ that violates the energy bound (2.7) would refute the theorem.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is Theorem 2.6: for time-periodic Bernoulli pressure data $P_{\mathrm{in/out}}\in L^2_{\mathrm{per}}(I)$ with $\|P_{\mathrm{in/out}}\|_{L^2_t}\le C_0(\mathrm{data})$, the coupled system (1.16) has at least one time-periodic weak solution $(u,\eta,d)$ in the energy space $\mathcal{V}^\eta_{\mathrm{soln}}$, and the bound $\sup_{t\in I}\mathcal E(t)+\int_I\mathcal D(t)\,dt\le C_0$ holds. The proof constructs the solution by decoupling the fluid-structure interaction, solving a linearized and regularized problem for each finite-dimensional Galerkin projection by a Leray-Schauder fixed-point argument, and then closing the nonlinear coupling with a set-valued Kakutani-Glicksberg-Fan fixed-point theorem. The same decoupling, together with the compactness result of Proposition 4.1, yields Corollary 2.10: finite-energy initial data produce a local weak solution even when the thick solid is purely elastic ($\delta=0$).

Load-bearing premise

The proof assumes that the finite-dimensional Galerkin system (5.7) is exactly the projection of the weak formulation (2.4), an equivalence stated without proof between (5.6) and (5.7); if the two systems describe different evolution laws, the energy estimates and fixed-point arguments apply to a different problem and Theorem 2.6 is not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A cardiac-cycle-type boundary condition of small periodic dynamic pressure is compatible with the existence of a time-periodic flow, shell displacement, and solid displacement in the 3D/2D/3D geometry.
  • The existence theory for multilayered fluid-structure interactions, previously available in the 2D/1D/2D setting, now extends to the full three-dimensional configuration.
  • Viscoelastic damping in the thick solid marks the boundary of the periodic existence argument: without it the theorem is not claimed, and only the local initial-value existence is obtained.
  • Any time-periodic solution produced by Theorem 2.6 obeys the quantitative balance $\sup_{t\in I}\mathcal E(t)+\int_I\mathcal D(t)\,dt\le C_0$, so small boundary data force uniformly small energy over the whole period.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The smallness threshold $C_0(\mathrm{data})$ is left implicit; a numerical continuation in $\|P_{\mathrm{in/out}}\|_{L^2_t}$ could map the actual boundary between periodic weak solutions and their absence, sharpening the theorem.
  • The same decoupling-and-extension strategy may adapt to non-Newtonian fluids of Carreau type, which the paper itself points toward in Remark 1.19 and which would make the model more realistic for blood.
  • If the theorem is correct, the contrast between periodic existence (which requires $\delta>0$) and initial-value existence (which allows $\delta=0$) suggests that viscoelasticity is the mechanism selecting recurrent dynamics in layered vessels; testing a lower-dimensional analog could isolate that effect.
  • The energy bound (2.7) gives a compactness route to long-time behavior: any periodic solution inherits bounded energy and dissipation, so questions about stability over successive cycles become well-posed.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Formalized claims in Lean

  1. Claim #1: Theorem 2.6: If P_in/out is time-periodic with sufficiently small L2 norm, then the coupled 3D fluid / 2D shell / 3D viscoelastic solid system (1.16) has at least one time-periodic weak solution (u, eta, d) in the energy space, and sup E + int D <= C0.

  2. Claim #2: Corollary 2.10: For finite-energy initial data, the same framework yields a local weak solution even when the thick solid is purely elastic (delta = 0).

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies a 3D/2D/3D fluid-structure interaction problem in which an incompressible viscous fluid in a cylinder interacts with a 2D thin elastic shell and a 3D thick elastic solid. The system is driven by time-periodic boundary data of Bernoulli-pressure type at the inlet and outlet. The main result, Theorem 2.6, asserts the existence of at least one time-periodic weak solution when the L^2 norm of the prescribed boundary pressure is sufficiently small, and Corollary 2.10 asserts a corresponding result for the initial-value problem, including the purely elastic thick-solid case. The strategy is to derive uniform energy estimates, prove L^2 compactness of the fluid velocity, then use a Galerkin approximation, a Leray-Schauder fixed-point argument for the finite-dimensional periodic problem, and a set-valued fixed-point argument for the decoupled regularized system.

Significance. If Theorem 2.6 is correct, the paper gives a meaningful extension of existing 2D/1D/2D multilayered FSI results to a fully 3D/2D/3D configuration, with a physiologically motivated Bernoulli-pressure boundary condition. The role of viscoelasticity in the thick solid is clearly highlighted: it provides the diffusion estimate (3.19) needed for the time-periodic energy bound. The paper also contains useful structural tools, notably the divergence-free extension operator of Proposition 3.1 and a compactness argument for the coupled unknowns. However, the correctness of the main existence proof currently rests on an unproved and apparently false equivalence between two Galerkin systems, so the significance cannot be fully assessed until that gap is resolved.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 5.1.1, Eqs. (5.6) and (5.7)] The assertion that (5.7) is an equivalent rewriting of (5.6) is not derived, and a direct computation indicates that it is false. For a moving domain Ω^δ(t), the Reynolds transport theorem gives d/dt(1/2∫ u·X) + 1/2∫(∂_t u·X - u·∂_t X) = ∫ ∂_t u·X + 1/2∫_{∂Ω^δ(t)} (u·X)(V·n), whereas the corresponding term in (5.6) is -∫ u·∂_t X. The difference between the two left-hand sides is generically nonzero, being d/dt∫ u·X minus half of the boundary integral, and the boundary term does not vanish because X_k^F = F_δ(Y_k) (or J_δ \tilde Z_k^F) depends on time through δ(t). Moreover, (5.7) as displayed omits the shell term -1/2(∂_t η_n)^2 (R+δ) X_k that appears in (5.6). Since (5.6) is the Galerkin projection of the weak formulation (2.4), the energy identity (5.8) and the subsequent Leray-Schauder argument in Proposition 5.11 may apply to a different evolution law. This is a load-bearing gap in the proof of Theorem 2.6.
  2. [Section 5.1.2, Remark 5.10 and Proposition 5.11] Remark 5.10 states that, for fixed n, a_n is bounded in C^2(I;R^n), but this is not proved and appears too strong as stated: the right-hand side of (5.7) contains the term ⟨F(t), X_k^F⟩, where P_in/out is only assumed to lie in L^2_per(I), so the second derivatives of a_n are at best in L^2, not necessarily in C^0. The compactness argument used in Proposition 5.11 would work with W^{2,2} or C^1 bounds, but the claim as written should be corrected and justified.
  3. [Section 2.2, proof of Corollary 2.10] The proof of Corollary 2.10 is deferred to [23] in a single sentence: the reader is told that the argument is a simplified version of Theorem 2.6, that Subsection 5.1.2 is skipped, and that the time interval is restricted to (0,T_max), with the details referred to [23]. Since the initial-value existence result is one of the paper's stated contributions, the proof should be supplied or at least the precise modifications and the role of [23] should be explained in enough detail to make the corollary verifiable.
  4. [Section 3.1, Proposition 3.1] The extension operator F_δ is a central tool used in the energy estimates, the compactness proof (e.g., Eq. (4.16)), and the upper-semicontinuity step of the fixed-point argument, but the proof of Proposition 3.1 is only the sentence 'It follows by elementary computations involving the product rule differentiation.' In particular, the stability estimate (3.4) with its L^q interpolation exponent is nontrivial and should be proved in detail or supported by a precise reference. As written, this leaves a load-bearing technical step without verification.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Section 5.2, Eq. (5.19)] In the upper-semicontinuity verification, Eq. (5.19) uses ∂_t q_n but the test functions are quantified as (q,ξ,ξ); the notation should be made consistent, and the construction of the limiting test functions (q - F_{Rεδ_n}ξ,0,0) ∈ V^{Rεδ_n}_{test} should be spelled out more carefully.
  2. [Section 3.3, Eq. (3.25)] The displayed term T_4, written as ∫_Ω_S (∂_t d)^2 |∇∂_t d · ∇d| dA dt, appears dimensionally inconsistent; it should presumably be (∂_t d)^2 |∇∂_t d| |∇d| or an analogous product.
  3. [Throughout] Several standard arguments are delegated to [23] and [28] without precise statements of what is being imported; adding explicit statements of the imported results would improve verifiability.
  4. [Section 5.3] The text contains small typographical errors, such as 'Propsition 4.1' instead of 'Proposition 4.1' and inconsistent use of Rεδ versus Rεη in the spaces V^{Rεδ}_{soln} and V^{Rεη}_{soln}; these should be corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the existence proof is self-contained and its load-bearing technical inputs are external results, not self-citations or fitted predictions.

full rationale

The paper proves an existence theorem for a time-periodic 3D/2D/3D FSI system. Its central claim is an existence result obtained by Galerkin approximation, a Leray-Schauder fixed-point argument for the Poincaré map, and a Kakutani-Glicksberg-Fan fixed-point argument for the decoupled regularized problem. None of these steps presuppose the theorem. The energy estimates in Section 3 are derived from the PDE by standard multipliers (u, ∂tη, ∂td) after integration by parts and Reynolds transport; the bound sup_t E(t) + ∫ D(t) ≤ C0 is obtained from the smallness assumption on ||P_in/out||, not fitted and not assumed. The viscoelasticity assumption is an explicit modeling input (Remark 1.17) used to produce the diffusion estimate (3.19); it is not a hidden way of assuming the conclusion. Self-citations to [27,28] are methodological ('resembling [23],[28]'), and the key technical lemmas (Korn identity, Piola transform, approximation lemma, Galerkin density, Picard-Lindelöf solvability) are cited to the external works [23,30,34,36] or proved in the paper, so no load-bearing premise reduces to a self-citation. The weakest point of the paper is not circularity but an omitted algebraic justification: the claim between (5.6) and (5.7) that the Galerkin system can be rewritten in 'equivalent form' is not derived, and on a moving domain the two first terms differ by ∫ ∂t u_n · X_k^F plus a boundary term; if that equivalence is false, the energy estimates in (5.8) and the fixed-point argument may target a different ODE system. This is a correctness gap, not a circular reduction: the target conclusion is not assumed in the inputs, and the asserted identity is not a fit or a self-citation. Accordingly, no circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no free parameters fitted to data and no new physical entities. Its central claim rests on standard PDE tools plus a paper-specific divergence-free extension operator whose key estimates (3.2)-(3.4) are asserted rather than demonstrated in detail. The viscoelasticity assumption is an explicit modeling choice essential for the time-periodic result.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math The Galerkin basis constructed from eigenfunctions of the Stokes operator and the shell basis spans the test space V^δ_test.
    Used in Section 5.1.1 to justify the finite-dimensional approximation; follows from standard spectral theory, cf. [36].
  • ad hoc to paper The divergence-free extension operator F_δ satisfies the estimates (3.2)-(3.4).
    Proposition 3.1 states these estimates with a one-line proof sketch. They are used critically in Section 4 for the L^2 compactness argument; if they fail, the compactness proof breaks.
  • domain assumption The viscoelasticity of the thick solid (δ>0 in (1.9)) provides the diffusion term ∫|∇∂_t d|^2 needed for the time-periodic energy estimates.
    Explicitly stated in Remark 1.17 and used to derive the diffusion estimate (3.19). Without it, only the initial-value problem is claimed.
  • standard math Standard tools: Leray-Schauder fixed point theorem, Kakutani-Glicksberg-Fan theorem, Bogovskii operator, Piola transform, Korn identity, trace and Poincaré inequalities.
    Used throughout Sections 3-6; all are classical results cited in the appendix.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multilayered fluid-structure interactions: existence of weak solutions for time-periodic and initial-value problems." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/7I4O2HQ7

@misc{pith2026250106820,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multilayered fluid-structure interactions: existence of weak solutions for time-periodic and initial-value problems},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/7I4O2HQ7}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.06820}
}
abstract

We study the interaction between incompressible viscous fluids and multilayered elastic structures in a 3D/2D/3D framework, where a 3D fluid interacts with a 2D thin elastic layer, coupled to a 3D thick elastic solid. The system is driven by time-periodic boundary conditions involving Bernoulli pressure. We prove the existence of at least one time-periodic weak solution when the boundary pressure has a sufficiently small $L^2-$ norm. A key feature of our analysis is the assumption of viscoelasticity in the thick solid, which is crucial for obtaining diffusion estimates and ensuring energy stability. Without this assumption, weak solutions are established for the initial-value problem. Our results extend prior work on 2D/1D/2D configurations to the more complex 3D/2D/3D setting, providing new insights into multilayered fluid-structure interactions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.06820 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The fluid-structure domain: a 2D section [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

36 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [23]

    Weak solutions for an incompressible Newtonian fluid interacting with a Koiter type shell

    Daniel Lengeler and Michael R˚ uˇ ziˇ cka. Weak solutions for an incompressible Newtonian fluid interacting with a Koiter type shell. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal. , 211(1):205–255, 2014. 4, 7, 14, 15, 16, 19, 20

    work page 2014

  2. [27]

    Time-periodic weak solutions for an incompressible Newtonian flu id interacting with an elastic plate

    Claudiu Mˆ ındril˘ a and Sebastian Schwarzacher. Time-periodic weak solutions for an incompressible Newtonian flu id interacting with an elastic plate. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 54(4):4139–4162, 2022. 5

    work page 2022

  3. [28]

    Time-periodic weak solutions for the interaction of an incompressible fluid with a linear Koiter type shell under dynamic pressure boundary conditions

    Claudiu Mˆ ındril˘ a and Sebastian Schwarzacher. Time-periodic weak solutions for the interaction of an incompres s- ible fluid with a linear Koiter type shell under dynamic press ure boundary conditions. Preprint, arXiv:2303.13625 [math.AP] (2023), 2023. 5, 7

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  4. [1]

    V ariational reso lution of outflow boundary conditions for incompressible Navier-Stokes

    Michal Bathory and Ulisse Stefanelli. V ariational reso lution of outflow boundary conditions for incompressible Navier-Stokes. Nonlinearity, 35(11):5553–5592, 2022. 5

    work page 2022

  5. [2]

    On the existence of strong solutio ns to a coupled fluid-structure evolution problem

    Hugo Beir˜ ao da V eiga. On the existence of strong solutio ns to a coupled fluid-structure evolution problem. Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics , 6:21–52, 2004. 4

    work page 2004

  6. [3]

    Resonance and periodi c solutions for harmonic oscillators with general forcing

    Isaac Benson and Justin T Webster. Resonance and periodi c solutions for harmonic oscillators with general forcing. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.17144 , 2024. 5

    arXiv 2024

  7. [4]

    M. E. Bogovskij. Solution of the first boundary value prob lem for the equation of continuity of an incompressible medium. Sov. Math., Dokl., 20:1094–1098, 1979. 19

    work page 1979

  8. [5]

    M. E. Bogovskij. The solution of some problems of vector a nalysis related to the operators div and grad. Tr. Semin. S.L. Soboleva 1, 5-40 (1980)., 1980. 19

    work page 1980

Show all 36 references
  1. [6]

    Compressibl e fluids interacting with a linear-elastic shell

    Dominic Breit and Sebastian Schwarzacher. Compressibl e fluids interacting with a linear-elastic shell. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 228(2):495–562, 2018. 5

    2018

  2. [7]

    Navier-Stok es-Fourier fluids interacting with elastic shells

    Dominic Breit and Sebastian Schwarzacher. Navier-Stok es-Fourier fluids interacting with elastic shells. Ann. Sc. Norm. Super . Pisa, Cl. Sci. (5), 24(2):619–690, 2023. 5

    2023

  3. [8]

    Moving boundary problems.Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society , 58(1):79–106, 2021

    Sunˇ cica ˇCani´ c. Moving boundary problems.Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society , 58(1):79–106, 2021. 4

    2021

  4. [9]

    Existence of time-periodic st rong solutions to a fluid-structure system

    Jean-J´ erˆ ome Casanova. Existence of time-periodic st rong solutions to a fluid-structure system. Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst., 39(6):3291–3313, 2019. 5

    2019

  5. [10]

    Existence of weak solutions for the unsteady interaction of a viscous fluid with an elastic plate

    Antonin Chambolle, Beno¯ ıt Desjardins, Maria J Esteban, and C´ eline Grandmont. Existence of weak solutions for the unsteady interaction of a viscous fluid with an elastic plate . Journal of Mathematical Fluid Mechanics , 7:368–404,

  6. [11]

    The interaction of t he 3d navier–stokes equations with a moving nonlinear koiter elastic shell

    CH Arthur Cheng and Steve Shkoller. The interaction of t he 3d navier–stokes equations with a moving nonlinear koiter elastic shell. SIAM journal on mathematical analysis , 42(3):1094–1155, 2010. 5

    2010

  7. [12]

    Philippe G. Ciarlet. An introduction to differential g eometry with applications to elasticity. J. Elasticity, 78-79(1- 3):3–201, 2005. 3 20

    2005

  8. [13]

    Conca, F

    C. Conca, F. Murat, and O. Pironneau. The Stokes and Navi er-Stokes equations with boundary conditions involving the pressure. Jpn. J. Math., New Ser ., 20(2):279–318, 1994. 5

    1994

  9. [14]

    Giovanni P . Galdi. An introduction to the mathematical theory of the Navier-Stokes equations. Steady-state problems. New Y ork, NY : Springer, 2nd ed. edition, 2011. 19

    2011

  10. [15]

    Hyperbolic–parabolic coupling and the occurrence of resonance in partially dissipative systems

    Giovanni Paolo Galdi, Mahdi Mohebbi, Rana Zakerzadeh, and Paolo Zunino. Hyperbolic–parabolic coupling and the occurrence of resonance in partially dissipative systems. Fluid-structure interaction and biomedical applications, pages 197–256, 2014. 5

    2014

  11. [16]

    Fixed point theory

    Andrzej Granas and James Dugundji. Fixed point theory. Springer Monogr. Math. New Y ork, NY : Springer, 2003. 20

    2003

  12. [17]

    Existence of weak solutions for the unsteady interaction of a viscous fluid with an elastic plate

    C´ eline Grandmont. Existence of weak solutions for the unsteady interaction of a viscous fluid with an elastic plate . SIAM journal on mathematical analysis , 40(2):716–737, 2008. 4

    2008

  13. [18]

    Existence of local strong solutions to fluid–beam an d fluid–rod interaction systems

    C´ eline Grandmont, Matthieu Hillairet, and Julien Leq ueurre. Existence of local strong solutions to fluid–beam an d fluid–rod interaction systems. Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar ´e C, Analyse non lin ´eaire, 36(4):1105–1149, 2019. 4

    2019

  14. [19]

    Time periodic navier–stokes equations in a th in tube structure

    Rita Juodagalvyt˙ e, Grigory Panasenko, and Konstanti nas Pileckas. Time periodic navier–stokes equations in a th in tube structure. Boundary V alue Problems, 2020:1–35, 2020. 5

    2020

  15. [20]

    On time-periodic solutions to an interaction problem between compressible viscous fluids and viscoelast ic beams

    Ondˇ rej Kreml, V´ aclav M´ acha,ˇS´ arka Neˇ casov´ a, and Srdan Trifunovi´ c. On time-periodic solutions to an interaction problem between compressible viscous fluids and viscoelast ic beams. Nonlinearity, 38(1):015005, nov 2024. 5

    2024

  16. [21]

    Weak solutions for an incompressible , generalized newtonian fluid interacting with a linearly elastic koiter type shell

    Daniel Lengeler. Weak solutions for an incompressible , generalized newtonian fluid interacting with a linearly elastic koiter type shell. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis , 46(4):2614–2649, 2014. 4

    2014

  17. [22]

    Weak solutions for an incompressible , generalized Newtonian fluid interacting with a linearly elastic Koiter type shell

    Daniel Lengeler. Weak solutions for an incompressible , generalized Newtonian fluid interacting with a linearly elastic Koiter type shell. SIAM J. Math. Anal. , 46(4):2614–2649, 2014. 6

    2014

  18. [24]

    Existence of a weak solution to a nonlinear fluid-structure interaction problem with heat ex change

    V´ aclav M´ acha, Boris Muha,ˇS´ arka Neˇ casov´ a, Arnab Roy, and Srdan Trifunovi´ c. Existence of a weak solution to a nonlinear fluid-structure interaction problem with heat ex change. Communications in partial differential equations , 47(8):1591–1635, 2022. 5

    2022

  19. [25]

    Max imal-in-time existence and uniqueness of strong solution of a 3d fluid-structure interaction model

    Debayan Maity, Jean-Pierre Raymond, and Arnab Roy. Max imal-in-time existence and uniqueness of strong solution of a 3d fluid-structure interaction model. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis , 52(6):6338–6378, 2020. 5

    2020

  20. [26]

    Existence of strong solutions for a system of interaction between a compressible viscous fluid and a wave equation

    Debayan Maity, Arnab Roy, and Tak´ eo Takahashi. Existence of strong solutions for a system of interaction between a compressible viscous fluid and a wave equation. Nonlinearity, 34(4):2659, 2021. 5

    2021

  21. [29]

    Time-periodic solutions for hyperbolic-parabolic systems

    Stanislav Mosny, Boris Muha, Sebastian Schwarzacher, and Justin T Webster. Time-periodic solutions for hyperbolic-parabolic systems. arXiv preprint arXiv:2412.18801 , 2024. 5

    2024

  22. [30]

    A note on the trace theorem for domains which are locally subgraph of a holder continuous function

    Boris Muha. A note on the trace theorem for domains which are locally subgraph of a holder continuous function. arXiv preprint arXiv:1311.3329 , 2013. 18

    2013 arXiv

  23. [31]

    Existence of a weak solut ion to a nonlinear fluid-structure interaction problem modeling the flow of an incompressible, viscous fluid in a cyli nder with deformable walls

    Boris Muha and Suncica Cani´ c. Existence of a weak solut ion to a nonlinear fluid-structure interaction problem modeling the flow of an incompressible, viscous fluid in a cyli nder with deformable walls. Arch. Ration. Mech. Anal., 207(3):919–968, 2013. 4

    2013

  24. [32]

    Existence of a solution to a fluid-multi-layered-st ructure interaction problem

    Boris Muha and Sunˇ cica ˇCani´ c. Existence of a solution to a fluid-multi-layered-st ructure interaction problem. J. Differ . Equations, 256(2):658–706, 2014. 4, 5, 7

    2014

  25. [33]

    Fluid-structure interaction between an incompres sible, viscous 3d fluid and an elastic shell with nonlinear Koiter membrane energy

    Boris Muha and Sunˇ cica ˇCani´ c. Fluid-structure interaction between an incompres sible, viscous 3d fluid and an elastic shell with nonlinear Koiter membrane energy. Interfaces Free Bound., 17(4):465–495, 2015. 4 21

    2015

  26. [34]

    Existence and r egularity of weak solutions for a fluid interacting with a non-linear shell in three dimensions

    Boris Muha and Sebastian Schwarzacher. Existence and r egularity of weak solutions for a fluid interacting with a non-linear shell in three dimensions. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar ´e, Anal. Non Lin ´eaire, 39(6):1369–1412, 2022. 4

    2022

  27. [35]

    Multiscale Analysis of Viscous Flows in Thin Tube Structures

    Grigory Panasenko and Konstantin Pileckas. Multiscale Analysis of Viscous Flows in Thin Tube Structures. Springer,

  28. [36]

    Blood-vessel-anatomy-The-vessel-wall-is-made-up-of-three-layers-tunica-adventitia-tunica_W640.jpg

    Gregory Seregin. Lecture notes on regularity theory for the Navier-Stokes eq uations. Hackensack, NJ: World Scientific, 2015. 15 22 This figure "Blood-vessel-anatomy-The-vessel-wall-is-made-up-of-three-layers-tunica-adventitia-tunica_W640.jpg" is available in "jpg" format from:...

    2015 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.