Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 1 cited by

Stable characterization of diagonal heat kernel upper bounds for symmetric Dirichlet forms

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read On doubling metric measure spaces, the paper proves that a Faber–Krahn inequality, a cutoff Sobolev inequality, a tail bound, and a new integrated jump condition with $(1-\nu)\gamma<1+\nu$ characterize the on-diagonal heat kernel upper…

desk verdict Genuinely new condition and an explicit counterexample, but two load-bearing proofs are omitted—worth refereeing, not desk-rejecting. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.06866 v1 pith:AYWF3BIJ submitted 2025-01-12 math.AP math.PR

Soobin Cho This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.APmath.PR MSC 35K0831C2560J35
keywords heatkernelDirichletformdoublingspaceFaber–KrahninequalitycutoffSobolevjumptailestimateintegratedconditionvariable-orderstable-likeprocess
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper seeks a stable, two-way characterization of on-diagonal heat kernel upper bounds for symmetric Dirichlet forms, covering local and non-local parts, on metric measure spaces with volume doubling. It proves that, once a cutoff Sobolev inequality and a jump-tail bound are in place, the on-diagonal bound $\mathrm{DUE}(\beta)$ follows from a Faber–Krahn inequality together with a newly introduced integrated jump condition $IJ_{2,\gamma}(\beta)$, and that the permissible range $(1-\nu)\gamma<1+\nu$ is optimal. The result requires no density for the jump kernel, which is the usual bottleneck in earlier stability results. A companion sharpness construction answers an open question in the negative: the tail, Faber–Krahn and cutoff Sobolev conditions alone do not force the heat kernel bound. A density version broadens the range of the $L^q$-tail condition to some $q<2$.

What carries the argument

The central new object is the integrated jump condition $IJ_{2,\gamma}(\beta)$, which averages the jump kernel over annuli against inverse square roots of ball volumes; it carries the inhomogeneity of the space in a way a pointwise tail bound cannot. The proof runs through truncated Dirichlet forms (removing jumps longer than a scale $\rho$), an $L^2$-mean value inequality for subharmonic functions, lower resolvent estimates of the semigroup, and survival estimates for truncated processes, using comparison inequalities between truncated and untruncated semigroups. A change-of-metric argument reduces a general scale function to a power-law scaling, and an explicit counterexample is built from products of Cantor-type spaces with variable-order jump kernels to prove sharpness.

What would settle it

Run the paper's explicit counterexample: on the n-fold product of a middle-ξ Cantor set with a variable-order jump kernel whose order jumps from 1 to β2 near two points, all stated hypotheses hold with $(1-\nu)\gamma<1+\nu+\varepsilon$, yet the heat kernel lower bound $t^{-((n-1)\alpha_\xi+\beta_2)}$ outgrows the on-diagonal upper bound $t^{-(1+1/\beta_2)n\alpha_\xi/2}$ as $t\to 0$; verifying this computation (or finding the error) settles whether the sharpness claim stands.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On a metric measure space satisfying volume doubling, a regular symmetric Dirichlet form without killing part, whose jump kernel satisfies the tail bound $\mathrm{TJ}(\beta)$, admits an on-diagonal heat kernel upper bound $\mathrm{DUE}(\beta)$ if its Faber–Krahn inequality $\mathrm{FK}_\nu(\beta)$, cutoff Sobolev inequality $\mathrm{CS}(\beta)$, and the new integrated jump condition $IJ_{2,\gamma}(\beta)$ hold with constants obeying $(1-\nu)\gamma<1+\nu$. The integrated condition measures how the jump kernel distributes mass across annuli, weighted by inverse square roots of ball volumes, and is what lets the argument run without assuming the jump kernel has a density. The same statement is false if the exponent inequality is relaxed by any positive amount: the paper builds metric measure spaces satisfying all hypotheses with $(1-\nu)\gamma<1+\nu+\varepsilon$ for any $\varepsilon>0$ where $\mathrm{DUE}(\beta)$ fails, so the range is optimal and the previously open Question 1 about whether tail and Faber–Krahn and cutoff Sobolev conditions alone suffice has a negative answer. When a jump density exists, the result extends the known $L^q$-tail implication to some exponents $q<2$.

Load-bearing premise

The framework assumes the Dirichlet form has no killing part—mass is never destroyed in place, only moved elsewhere—and the truncation, energy-measure, and conservativeness arguments all depend on that; introduce killing and the characterization may fail.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Under volume doubling, the on-diagonal bound for a wide class of non-local and mixed Dirichlet forms can be certified by the four local-to-global conditions, without any density for the jump kernel.
  • The negative answer to Question 1 means that tail-type jump bounds alone, even with a Faber–Krahn inequality and cutoff Sobolev inequality, are insufficient; the integrated condition is essentially necessary.
  • For strongly local forms, and for jump forms whose volume growth is not too anisotropic, the full equivalence $\mathrm{WFK}_\nu(\phi)+\mathrm{CS}(\phi)\iff \mathrm{DUE}(\phi)+\mathrm{SE}(\phi)$ holds (Corollary 2.10).
  • When the jump kernel has a density, the $L^q$-tail range is widened: the implication holds for some $q<2$, improving the previous $q\ge 2$ threshold.
  • The applications include stable-like variable-order operators on $\mathbb{R}^d$ with no jump density and product spaces whose factor forms have singular jump kernels, both cases not covered by earlier stability results.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because the arguments never touch the density, the method should transfer directly to cylindrical fractional Laplacians and other singular kernels for which no density exists; constructing such an example at the boundary exponent would test the sharpness further.
  • The product-Cantor counterexample suggests that variable-order jump kernels whose order varies in space produce heat kernels with exponents that mix the local orders; this could be used to build models of anisotropic walk dimension on fractals.
  • A concrete next test is whether $IJ_{2,\gamma}$ is preserved under rough isometries or quasisymmetric maps; if it is, the characterization would be stable under the same equivalence classes as the classical heat kernel estimates.
  • For applied analysis, the integrated condition can be read as a quantitative measure of metric inhomogeneity, and one could check numerically whether it is the sharp diagnostic for failure of diagonal heat kernel bounds in random media.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper develops a stable characterization of on-diagonal upper bounds for heat kernels of regular symmetric Dirichlet forms without killing part on metric measure spaces satisfying volume doubling. The main forward result, Theorem 2.9(ii), states that under VD, CS(ϕ) and TJ(ϕ), the weak Faber–Krahn inequality WFKν(ϕ) together with the new integrated jump condition IJ2,γ(ϕ) implies DUE(ϕ)+SE(ϕ), provided (1−ν)γ<1+ν. Theorem 2.11 gives an explicit counterexample showing the parameter range cannot be improved in general, and Theorems 1.2 and 2.14 record the sharpness statement and an extension to jump densities satisfying TJq(ϕ) for some q<2. The applications in Section 9 concern variable-order nonlocal operators and singular jump kernels.

Significance. If the proofs are completed as indicated, this would be a substantial contribution: it removes the density assumption from the existing stability theory, introduces a flexible integrated jump condition IJ2,γ, and supplies an explicit Cantor-type counterexample demonstrating optimality. The technical route through truncated Dirichlet forms, lower resolvent estimates, and a change of metric is well structured and contains many new comparison and self-improvement arguments. The explicit counterexample in Theorem 2.11 is a genuine strength of the paper. However, two load-bearing passages are currently left as omitted details or delegated to an unpublished preprint, so the central claims are not yet verifiable from the manuscript alone.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 5, Lemma 5.4] Lemma 5.4 is introduced with 'The details are omitted' and is stated to follow from adapting [29, Cor. 10.3 and Lemma 11.2] from FKν to WFKν. This lemma is essential: it is used in Proposition 5.9 to obtain LREκ(ϕ), which then yields SE(ϕ), and through Theorem 7.2 it feeds into Theorem 2.9(ii). The text does not prove that the additive constant C′ in WFKν can be absorbed uniformly over all balls and all levels a, nor that the truncation of the Faber–Krahn term preserves the uniform constants δ,η required by Lemma 5.4. Because this is the exact point where the weaker hypothesis WFKν is used, the forward implication is currently incomplete. Please provide the full proof or a precise statement of the modified argument.
  2. [Section 8.2, proof of Theorem 1.2] The sharpness claim, including the negative answer to Question 1 and the optimality of the range (2.13), is obtained by 'applying the change of metric from Proposition 7.3' with 'The details are omitted.' Proposition 7.3 itself, as well as parts of Proposition 7.6(i)–(ii), is cited from the unpublished preprint [30]. Since Theorem 1.2 is one of the headline results and the main optimality statement, this is a load-bearing gap rather than a presentation issue. Please include a self-contained proof of the metric transformation (or of the needed consequence of [30]) and give the full verification that the counterexample from Theorem 2.11 satisfies the required conditions after the transformation with the stated constants and with (1−ν)γ<1+ν+ε.
  3. [Section 8.1, proof of Theorem 2.9] The proof of Theorem 2.9(ii) is compressed into the chain (8.1): WFK+CS ⇒ GFK+LRE, GFK ⇔ Nash, LRE ⇒ SE, followed by an application of Theorem 7.2. The conclusion is therefore valid only if Proposition 5.9, Lemma 5.4, and Theorem 7.2 are fully established. Given that Lemma 5.4 and parts of Section 7 depend on omitted details or on [30], the main implication should be regarded as conditional until those gaps are filled. I am not asking for more detail in the chain (8.1) itself, but for the missing inputs to be made available within the manuscript.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 2, Definition 2.6] The condition '0<R< R+ r < R′' is written with 'R+ r' rather than 'R + r'; the spacing should be fixed to avoid misreading.
  2. [Section 2, framework] The blanket assumption that (E,F) has no killing part is stated only in Section 2. Since it is essential for extending E to F′ and for several conservativeness and truncation arguments, it should be advertised in the abstract or introduction as a standing restriction.
  3. [Introduction and Section 9] There are several typographical errors, e.g. 'mainfolds' in the introduction and 'Alfhors' for 'Ahlfors'; these should be corrected in the final version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the target DUE(β) is not assumed, the hypotheses are distinct conditions, and the main cited inputs are external works rather than self-referential loops.

full rationale

The paper's central implication (Theorem 1.1 / Theorem 2.9(ii)) derives DUE(β) from WFKν(ϕ), CS(ϕ), TJ(ϕ) and IJ2,γ(ϕ). The on-diagonal upper bound is not among the hypotheses; IJ2,γ is an integrated jump-kernel condition stated independently of DUE, and the paper explicitly treats the case where the jump kernel has no density, so the conclusion is not built into the definition of the assumptions. The sharpness statement Theorem 2.11 constructs an explicit Cantor-type counterexample in which TJ, WFK, CS and IJ2,γ hold with the stated parameter range while DUE fails, which shows that the assumptions do not already contain the conclusion. The proof does contain two notable proof-completeness gaps: Lemma 5.4 is stated after 'The details are omitted' and is adapted from [29, Cor. 10.3 and Lemma 11.2], and the proof of Theorem 1.2 says 'By applying the change of metric from Proposition 7.3... The details are omitted,' relying on [30]. However, these are external citations to prior work by Grigor'yan–Hu–Hu and not self-citations of the author; they do not assume the target DUE(β) or the equivalence being proved. Moreover, the no-killing-part restriction is a framework condition on the Dirichlet form that is structurally separate from the heat-kernel upper bound. There are no fitted parameters renamed as predictions, no uniqueness assertions imported from the author's own previous work, and no definitional equivalence between the hypotheses and the conclusion. Overall, the derivation chain is not circular; the omitted-details concerns belong to proof completeness and correctness risk, not to circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

All assumptions are structural hypotheses on the metric measure space and the Dirichlet form. The only hand-chosen numbers appear in the counterexample for sharpness (Theorem 2.11), not in the positive implication. The proof imports several external results, including [29] and the unpublished [30], which raises the axiom burden but is not circular. No invented entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • Counterexample parameters ξ, n, β2 in Theorem 2.11 = ξ with α_ξ ≤ ε/2; n satisfying (8.12); β2 = (1 - 2(1+ε)/(n α_ξ))^{-1}
    Hand-chosen to satisfy VD, RVD, TJ, CS, WFK, IJ2,γ while DUE fails; these choices establish sharpness of (2.13), not the positive theorem.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The Dirichlet form has no killing part and decomposes as E^(L) + E^(J).
    Section 2 states this always. Used for extending energy measures to F', for conservativeness, and for truncated form comparisons.
  • domain assumption Metric measure space assumptions: locally compact separable metric space, Radon measure with full support, precompact balls.
    Section 2 and Appendix; every theorem is stated in this framework.
  • domain assumption Scale function conditions (2.3)-(2.4) and volume doubling (1.9); reverse volume doubling only when stated.
    Theorems 2.9 and 2.14 require VD(α); RVD appears in Theorem 2.14 and Corollary 2.10.
  • domain assumption The input hypotheses TJ(ϕ), CS(ϕ), WFK/FK, IJ2,γ(ϕ), or TJ_q(ϕ) are taken as assumptions in each implication.
    These are the premises of the theorems; they are not derived in the paper.
  • standard math Heat kernel existence and pointwise regularity results from [26] and [35] are used as black boxes.
    Section A.1 and Theorem 6.20; the paper does not reprove them.
  • standard math External lemmas from [29], [30], [17], [36], [32], and [33] are imported, including the change-of-metric Proposition 7.3 from the preprint [30].
    Sections 5, 6, 7; for example Lemma 3.7 follows from [29, Lemmas 6.2 and 13.5] and Proposition 7.3 from [30, Proposition 6.1].

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Stable characterization of diagonal heat kernel upper bounds for symmetric Dirichlet forms." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AYWF3BIJ

@misc{pith2026250106866,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Stable characterization of diagonal heat kernel upper bounds for symmetric Dirichlet forms},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AYWF3BIJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.06866}
}
read the original abstract

We present a stable characterization of on-diagonal upper bounds for heat kernels associated with regular Dirichlet forms on metric measure spaces satisfying the volume doubling property. Our conditions include integral bounds on the jump kernel outside metric balls, a variant of the Faber-Krahn inequality, a cutoff Sobolev inequality, and an integral control of inverse square volumes of balls with respect to the jump kernel. Crucially, we do not assume that the jump kernel has a density, and we show that these assumptions are essentially optimal.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Heat kernel estimates for Markov processes with blowing-up jump kernels

    math.PR 2025-12 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    Sharp two-sided heat-kernel estimates are established for symmetric jump Markov processes with jump kernels that blow up at the boundary of a κ-fat domain, under a strict bound on the blow-up's Matuszewska index.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

50 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [30]

    Grigor’yan, E

    A. Grigor’yan, E. Hu, J. Hu: Tail estimates and off-diagonal upper bounds of the heat kernel, preprint, 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [1]

    Andres, M

    S. Andres, M. T. Barlow: Energy inequalities for cutoff functions and some applications. J. Reine Angew. Math. 699 (2015), 183–215

    work page 2015

  3. [2]

    M. T. Barlow, R. F. Bass: Transition densities for Brownian motion on the Sierpi´ nski carpet. Probab. Theory Related Fields 91 (1992), no. 3-4, 307–330

    work page 1992

  4. [3]

    M. T. Barlow, R. F. Bass: Stability of parabolic Harnack inequalities. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 356 (2004), 1501–1533

    work page 2004

  5. [4]

    M. T. Barlow, R. F. Bass, T. Kumagai: Stability of parabolic Harnack inequalities on metric measure spaces. J. Math. Soc. Japan 58 (2006), no. 2, 485–519

    work page 2006

  6. [5]

    M. T. Barlow, A. Grigor’yan, T. Kumagai: Heat kernel upper bounds for jump processes and the first exit time. J. Reine Angew. Math. 626 (2009), 135–157

    work page 2009

  7. [6]

    M. T. Barlow, T. Kumagai: Transition density asymptotics for some diffusion processes with multi- fractal structures. Electron. J. Probab. 6 (2001), no. 9, 23 pp. 59

    work page 2001

  8. [7]

    M. T. Barlow, M. Murugan: Stability of the elliptic Harnack inequality. Ann. of Math. (2) 187 (2018), no. 3, 777–823

    work page 2018

Show all 50 references
  1. [8]

    R. F. Bass, Z.-Q. Chen: Systems of equations driven by stable processes. Probab. Theory Related Fields 134 (2006), no. 2, 175–214

    2006

  2. [9]

    R. F. Bass, Z.-Q. Chen: Regularity of harmonic functions for a class of singular stable-like processes. Math. Z. 266 (2010), no. 3, 489–503

    2010

  3. [10]

    R. F. Bass, M. Kassmann, T. Kumagai: Symmetric jump processes: localization, heat kernels and convergence. Ann. Inst. Henri Poincar´ e Probab. Stat.46 (2010), no.1, 59–71

    2010

  4. [11]

    Boutayeb, T

    S. Boutayeb, T. Coulhon, A. Sikora: A new approach to pointwise heat kernel upper bounds on doubling metric measure spaces. Adv. Math. 270 (2015), 302–374

    2015

  5. [12]

    E. A. Carlen, S. Kusuoka, D. W. Stroock: Upper bounds for symmetric Markov transition functions. Ann. Inst. H. Poincar´ e Probab. Statist.23 (1987), no.2, 245–287

    1987

  6. [13]

    Z.-Q. Chen, M. Fukushima: Symmetric Markov processes, time change, and boundary theory. London Math. Soc. Monogr. Ser., 35 Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2012

    2012

  7. [14]

    Z.-Q. Chen, P. Kim, T. Kumagai: On heat kernel estimates and parabolic Harnack inequality for jump processes on metric measure spaces. Acta Math. Sin. (Engl. Ser.) 25 (2009), no. 7, 1067–1086

    2009

  8. [15]

    Z.-Q. Chen, T. Kumagai, J. Wang: Elliptic Harnack inequalities for symmetric non-local Dirichlet forms. J. Math. Pures Appl. 125 (2019), 1–42

    2019

  9. [16]

    Z.-Q. Chen, T. Kumagai, J. Wang: Heat kernel estimates and parabolic Harnack inequalities for sym- metric Dirichlet forms. Adv. Math. 374 (2020), 107269, 71 pp

    2020

  10. [17]

    Z.-Q. Chen, T. Kumagai, J. Wang: Stability of parabolic Harnack inequalities for symmetric non-local Dirichlet forms. J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 22 (2020), no. 11, 3747–3803

    2020

  11. [18]

    Z.-Q. Chen, T. Kumagai, J. Wang: Stability of heat kernel estimates for symmetric non-local Dirichlet forms. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 271 (2021), no.1330, v+89 pp

    2021

  12. [19]

    Coulhon, A

    T. Coulhon, A. Grigor’yan: Random walks on graphs with regular volume growth. Geom. Funct. Anal. 8 (1998), no. 4, 656–701

    1998

  13. [20]

    P. J. Fitzsimmons, B. M. Hambly, T. Kumagai: Transition density estimates for Brownian motion on affine nested fractals. Comm. Math. Phys. 165 (1994), no. 3, 595–620

    1994

  14. [21]

    Fukushima, Y

    M. Fukushima, Y. Oshima, M. Takeda: Dirichlet forms and symmetric Markov processes. Second revised and extended edition, De Gruyter Stud. Math., 19, Walter de Gruyter & Co., Berlin, 2011

    2011

  15. [22]

    Grigor’yan: Heat kernel upper bounds on a complete non-compact manifold

    A. Grigor’yan: Heat kernel upper bounds on a complete non-compact manifold. Rev. Mat. Iberoameri- cana 10 (1994), no. 2, 395–452

    1994

  16. [23]

    Grigor’yan, J

    A. Grigor’yan, J. Hu: Upper bounds of heat kernels on doubling spaces. Moscow Math. J. 14 (2014) 505-563

    2014

  17. [24]

    Grigor’yan, E

    A. Grigor’yan, E. Hu, J. Hu: Lower estimates of heat kernels for non-local Dirichlet forms on metric measure spaces. J. Funct. Anal. 272 (2017), no.8, 3311–3346

    2017

  18. [25]

    Grigor’yan, E

    A. Grigor’yan, E. Hu, J. Hu: Two-sided estimates of heat kernels of jump type Dirichlet forms. Adv. Math. 330 (2018), 433–515. 60

    2018

  19. [26]

    Grigor’yan, E

    A. Grigor’yan, E. Hu, J. Hu: The pointwise existence and properties of heat kernel. Adv. Anal. Geom., 3:27–69, 2021

    2021

  20. [27]

    Grigor’yan, E

    A. Grigor’yan, E. Hu, J. Hu: Off-diagonal lower estimates and H¨ older regularity of the heat kernel. Asian J. Math. 27 (2023), no. 5, 675–770

    2023

  21. [28]

    Grigor’yan, E

    A. Grigor’yan, E. Hu, J. Hu: Parabolic mean value inequality and on-diagonal upper bound of the heat kernel on doubling spaces. Math. Ann. 389 (2024), no.3, 2411–2467

    2024

  22. [29]

    Grigor’yan, E

    A. Grigor’yan, E. Hu, J. Hu: Mean value inequality and generalized capacity on doubling spaces. Pure Appl. Funct. Anal. 9 (2024), no.1, 111–168

    2024

  23. [31]

    Grigor’yan, J

    A. Grigor’yan, J. Hu, K.-S. Lau: Heat kernels on metric spaces with doubling measure. Fractal geometry and stochastics IV, 3–44. Progr. Probab., 61 Birkh¨ auser Verlag, Basel, 2009

    2009

  24. [32]

    Grigor’yan, J

    A. Grigor’yan, J. Hu, K.-S. Lau: Comparison inequalities for heat semigroups and heat kernels on metric measure spaces. J. Funct. Anal. 259 (2010), 2613-2641

    2010

  25. [33]

    Grigor’yan, J

    A. Grigor’yan, J. Hu, K.-S. Lau: Estimates of heat kernels for non-local regular Dirichlet forms. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 366 (2014), no.12, 6397–6441

    2014

  26. [34]

    Grigor’yan, J

    A. Grigor’yan, J. Hu, K.-S. Lau: Generalized capacity, Harnack inequality and heat kernels of Dirichlet forms on metric measure spaces. J. Math. Soc. Japan 67 (2015), no. 4, 1485–1549

    2015

  27. [35]

    Grigor’yan, A

    A. Grigor’yan, A. Telcs: Two-sided estimates of heat kernels on metric measure spaces. Ann. Probab. 40 (2012), no.3, 1212-1284

    2012

  28. [36]

    Grzywny, K

    T. Grzywny, K. Szczypkowski: L´ evy processes: concentration function and heat kernel bounds. Bernoulli 26 (2020), no. 4, 3191–3223

    2020

  29. [37]

    B. M. Hambly, J. Kigami, T. Kumagai: Multifractal formalisms for the local spectral and walk dimen- sions. Math. Proc. Cambridge Philos. Soc. 132 (2002), no. 3, 555–571

    2002

  30. [38]

    Heinonen: Lectures on Analysis on Metric Spaces, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2001

    J. Heinonen: Lectures on Analysis on Metric Spaces, Springer-Verlag, New York, 2001

    2001

  31. [39]

    Ionescu, L

    M. Ionescu, L. G. Rogers, R. S. Strichartz: Pseudo-differential operators on fractals and other metric measure spaces. Rev. Mat. Iberoam. 29 (2013), no. 4, 1159–1190

    2013

  32. [40]

    Kassmann, K.-Y

    M. Kassmann, K.-Y. Kim, T. Kumagai: Heat kernel bounds for nonlocal operators with singular kernels. J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 164 (2022), 1–26

    2022

  33. [41]

    Kigami: Local Nash inequality and inhomogeneity of heat kernels

    J. Kigami: Local Nash inequality and inhomogeneity of heat kernels. Proc. London Math. Soc. (3) 89 (2004), no. 2, 525–544

    2004

  34. [42]

    Kigami: Volume doubling measures and heat kernel estimates on self-similar sets

    J. Kigami: Volume doubling measures and heat kernel estimates on self-similar sets. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 199 (2009), no. 932, viii+94 pp

    2009

  35. [43]

    Kigami: Resistance forms, quasisymmetric maps and heat kernel estimates

    J. Kigami: Resistance forms, quasisymmetric maps and heat kernel estimates. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 216 (2012), no.1015, vi+132 pp

    2012

  36. [44]

    Li, S.-T

    P. Li, S.-T. Yau: On the parabolic kernel of the Schr¨ odinger operator. Acta Math. 156 (1986), no. 3-4, 153–201. 61

    1986

  37. [45]

    Nash: Continuity of Solutions of Parabolic and Elliptic Equations

    J. Nash: Continuity of Solutions of Parabolic and Elliptic Equations. American Journal of Mathematics 80 (1958), 931–954

    1958

  38. [46]

    Saloff-Coste: A note on Poincar´ e, Sobolev, and Harnack inequalities

    L. Saloff-Coste: A note on Poincar´ e, Sobolev, and Harnack inequalities. Internat. Math. Res. Notices 1992, no. 2, 27–38

    1992

  39. [47]

    R. S. Strichartz: Analysis on products of fractals. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 357 (2005), no. 2, 571–615

    2005

  40. [48]

    Sturm: Analysis on local Dirichlet spaces

    K.-T. Sturm: Analysis on local Dirichlet spaces. II. Upper Gaussian estimates for the fundamental solutions of parabolic equations. Osaka J. Math. 32 (1995), no. 2, 275–312

    1995

  41. [49]

    N. Th. Varopoulos: Hardy-Littlewood theory for semigroups. J. Funct. Anal. 63 (1985), no. 2, 240–260

    1985

  42. [50]

    Xu: A class of singular symmetric Markov processes

    F. Xu: A class of singular symmetric Markov processes. Potential Anal. 38 (2013), no. 1, 207–232. 62

    2013

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.