Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 51 references

Blow-up of the one-dimensional wave equation with quadratic spatial derivative nonlinearity

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The one-dimensional wave equation with quadratic spatial derivative nonlinearity admits no smooth exact self-similar blow-up, but a five-parameter family of logarithmically growing profiles is constructed and proved nonlinearly stable.

desk verdict Explicit profiles and mode stability are solid, but Theorem 1.7 rests on a resolvent estimate in §4.5 that has a norm error and a misclassified term; the stability proof needs a fix. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.07887 v1 pith:AVCQDGMN submitted 2025-01-14 math.AP

Tej-eddine Ghoul , Jie Liu , Nader Masmoudi This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35L0535B4435B35
keywords waveequationblow-upquadraticderivativenonlinearitygeneralizedself-similarsolutionsnonlinearstabilityLorentztransformationlogarithmicgrowtheffectivefieldtheory
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies the one-dimensional wave equation $u_{tt}-u_{xx}=(u_x)^2$, a model that arises in effective field theory in cosmology. It proves that no smooth exact self-similar blow-up solutions exist, and that the only stationary solutions are singular logarithmic functions. It then constructs a five-parameter family of smooth generalized self-similar solutions whose leading term grows like $-\alpha\log(1-t/T)$, and proves in Theorem 1.7 that the endpoint members of this family, $\beta=\infty$ (and by reflection $\beta=0$), are nonlinearly stable. Concretely, any sufficiently small perturbation of the initial data in $H^{k+1}\times H^k$ (with $k\ge k_{\alpha_0}+3$) still blows up, with adjusted parameters $\alpha^*,T^*,\kappa^*$ and a residual decay of $O((T^*-t)^{1-\delta})$. If the theorem is right, small smooth perturbations of these explicit profiles remain in the same logarithmic blow-up regime; the only freedom is a slight shift of time, place, and amplitude.

What carries the argument

The argument is carried by four devices. The generalized self-similar ansatz $U(s,y)=\alpha s+\tilde U(y)$ turns the PDE into a Riccati ODE that can be integrated in closed form, producing the explicit five-parameter family. The Lorentz transformation in self-similar variables, a space-time boost applied after passing to similarity coordinates, converts the Heun-type eigenvalue ODE with four singular points into a hypergeometric equation, whose connection theory proves that the only unstable eigenvalues are $0$ and $1$. Because the derivative nonlinearity produces only a bounded, non-compact perturbation of the free wave operator, the authors add a finite-rank projection to the linearized operator so that the remainder is dissipative; this restores compactness and locates the essential spectrum. A direct resolvent estimate then converts the spectral information into a uniform semigroup growth bound, and a contraction-mapping argument on an exponentially weighted space closes the nonlinear stability.

What would settle it

Numerically solve the eigenvalue problem for the linearized operator at $u_{\alpha,\infty}$ on $[-1,1]$ for several $\alpha>0$: mode stability asserts that no smooth eigenfunction exists with $\mathrm{Re}\,\lambda > -1$ except $\lambda=0,1$, with $\lambda=0$ having exactly one generalized eigenfunction; finding any additional unstable or neutral mode, or a second generalized eigenfunction, would falsify the stability theorem.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that blow-up for (1.1) is logarithmic rather than self-similar in the classical sense. Exact self-similar profiles fail: the stationary ODE forces a singularity inside the light cone, so no smooth exact self-similar blow-up exists. By allowing a term linear in the similarity variable, $U(s,y)=\alpha s+\tilde U(y)$, the authors solve the resulting Riccati ODE explicitly and obtain smooth profiles $u_{\alpha,\beta,\kappa,T,x_0}$ for $\alpha>0$ (with $\beta=0,\infty$ always smooth, and finite $\beta$ smooth only when $\sqrt{1+\alpha}$ is a positive integer). The main stability theorem asserts that the profile $u_{\alpha_0,\infty,\kappa_0,T_0,x_0}$ is nonlinearly stable: for every small real perturbation $(f,g)\in H^{k+1}(\mathbb{R})\times H^k(\mathbb{R})$, $k\ge k_{\alpha_0}+3$, there exist nearby parameters $(\alpha^*,T^*,\kappa^*)$ and a unique solution in the backward light cone whose difference from $u_{\alpha^*,\infty,\kappa^*,T^*,x_0}$ decays like $(T^*-t)^{1-\delta}$ in all derivatives up to order $k+1$; the reflected statement for $\beta=0$ follows from the symmetry $x\mapsto -x$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that generic blow-up of the equation can be represented by the generalized self-similar ansatz $U(s,y)=\alpha s+\tilde U(y)$ plus a decaying remainder; the stability theorem proves this for the constructed family, but the genericity of the ansatz is only conjectured in the paper.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Any sufficiently small smooth perturbation of a stable profile $u_{\alpha_0,\infty,\kappa_0,T_0,x_0}$ still blows up at a finite time, with blow-up time, center, and additive constant shifting by $O(\epsilon)$ and the same logarithmic profile persisting.
  • No smooth exact self-similar or solitary-wave blow-up exists for (1.1); since the only stationary solutions are singular logarithmic functions, any smooth blow-up must carry logarithmic growth in similarity time.
  • By finite propagation speed and a cutoff construction, the paper obtains smooth global-in-space blow-up solutions, and the stability theorem makes these solutions reachable from small localized perturbations of the explicit profile.
  • The proof strategy, combining a Lorentz reduction to a hypergeometric connection problem with a dissipative-plus-finite-rank decomposition of the linearized operator, is designed to extend to higher dimensions and to other equations with explicit self-similar solutions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if the genericity conjecture in the paper is correct, the M-type singularities seen in numerical EFT simulations should carry a logarithmic prefactor; the paper suggests those simulations may have been capturing superpositions of profiles with $\alpha$ approaching $0$ as $t\to T$.
  • Editorial inference: the Lorentz reduction indicates that this derivative-quadratic nonlinearity becomes ODE-like in a boosted frame, so the same device may help classify the numerically observed V-type versus M-type singularities in related cosmological models.
  • Editorial inference: because the stability theorem is localized in the backward light cone and the equation has finite propagation speed, generic compactly supported perturbations of the stable profile should produce smooth global-in-space blow-up solutions, not merely cone-localized ones.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the one-dimensional wave equation with quadratic spatial derivative nonlinearity, utt - uxx = (ux)^2. It proves (Theorem 1.1) that no smooth exact self-similar blow-up solutions exist, and it constructs an explicit five-parameter family of generalized self-similar solutions with logarithmic growth. The main stability result (Theorem 1.7) asserts that the beta = infinity subfamily, and by symmetry the beta = 0 subfamily, is asymptotically stable under small perturbations in H^{k+1} x H^k: the perturbed solution blows up at a nearby time T* with adjusted parameters, and the difference from the adjusted profile decays like (T* - t)^{1-delta} in all derivatives up to order k+1. The proof combines a Lorentz transformation in self-similar variables to reduce the mode-stability problem to a hypergeometric connection problem, a spectral analysis of the non-self-adjoint linearized operator via a finite-rank dissipative decomposition, a uniform resolvent estimate, and a Lyapunov-Perron fixed-point argument for the nonlinear evolution.

Significance. If completed, this is a substantial contribution: it provides the first explicit blow-up profiles for (1.1), and it extends Donninger's spectral framework to a setting with a non-compact derivative perturbation. The explicit profiles are parameter-free and can be checked by direct substitution; the Lorentz transformation is an elegant device that reduces a Heun connection problem to a hypergeometric one; the nonlinear iteration is standard once the linear decay is available. The main caveat is that the uniform resolvent estimate in Section 4.5, which is the linchpin of the linear and nonlinear stability, is not established as written, so Theorem 1.7 is currently conditional. The paper also does not prove that the generalized self-similar ansatz captures generic blow-up dynamics; Remark 1.5 only conjectures this, so the stability result applies to a specially prepared family.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 4.5, Proposition 4.11 and the display following (4.12)] The uniform resolvent estimate (4.11) is load-bearing: it is used in Proposition 5.1 to obtain the exponential decay of the semigroup on the stable subspace, and hence it underlies Theorem 1.7. The proof of the lower bound (4.12) is not valid as written. In the expansion of ((lambda - L_alpha)q,q) on dot H^{k+1} x dot H^k, the principal terms are written with linear norms, e.g. (1/2 + k + Re lambda)(||partial^{k+1} q_1||_{L^2} + ||partial^k q_2||_{L^2}), while (4.12) is a quadratic lower bound in ||q||_{H^k}; similarly the term i Im lambda (||partial^{k+1} q_1|| + ||partial^k q_2||) should be i Im lambda (||partial^{k+1} q_1||^2 + ||partial^k q_2||^2). The potential term integral of 2 alpha/(sqrt(1+alpha)+y) partial^{k+1} q_1 overline{partial^k q_2} and the lower-order commutator sum are not pure imaginary, contrary to the assertion in the text; their real parts must be absorbed, for example by the large imaginary part after the norms are squared, or by the coefficient k - sqrt(1+alpha) - 1/2 - epsilon uniformly over alpha in B_epsilon(alpha_0). The manuscript provides neither computation. In addition, the displayed bracket with y partial^{2+k} q_1 partial^k q_1 appears twice with identical signs and is therefore identically zero, so it cannot represent the intended purely imaginary boundary term unless one factor is conjugated. A corrected proof must rewrite the expansion with squared norms and carry out the absorption of the real part of the potential term before (4.12) can be accepted.
  2. [Section 4.5, S1 region] Even after the homogeneity issue in the expansion is repaired, the treatment of the region S1 = {Re lambda >= -w0, |Im lambda| >= n} is incomplete: the final lower bound in the S1 case contains Im lambda rather than |Im lambda|, so negative imaginary parts with large modulus are not covered by the stated inequality. Because L_alpha has real coefficients, the resolvent satisfies R_{L_alpha}(conj(lambda)) = conj(R_{L_alpha}(lambda)), so the estimate for negative imaginary parts can be obtained by conjugation; this step must be stated explicitly and the lower bound should be written with |Im lambda|.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Theorem 1.7] The abstract says 'these blow-up solutions' are asymptotically stable, but Theorem 1.7 proves stability only for the beta = infinity and beta = 0 subfamilies; Remark 1.9 conjectures only co-dimensional stability for 0 < beta < infinity. The wording should be adjusted to avoid overstating the scope.
  2. [Equation (2.5)] The displayed closed form for partial_y W_{alpha,beta,kappa} has a parenthesis mismatch and is difficult to read; the authors should rewrite it in a fully parenthesized form, since this formula is used in the explicit profile construction.
  3. [Section 6.2, dual basis definition] In the definition of g^n_alpha, the term f_{0,beta} should presumably be f_{0,alpha}; as printed, an undeclared parameter beta appears.
  4. [Section 4.1 and Section 6] The notation H^k is used in Section 4 for the product space H^{k+1}(-1,1) x H^k(-1,1), while Section 6 writes H^k(B); this should be harmonized and defined once in the notation section.
  5. [Proposition 3.11] The step from the coefficient ratio r_n(lambda) -> 1 to the conclusion that the radius of convergence is exactly 1 relies on the fact that a_n(lambda) is nonzero for all n when lambda is not in {0,1} and Re lambda > -1; this is true, but it should be stated explicitly, together with the non-termination of the hypergeometric series in the cases where c - a - b is a nonpositive integer.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the blow-up profiles are constructed explicitly and the stability proof rests on independent spectral and ODE arguments.

full rationale

The paper's central construction (Theorem 1.1) is self-contained in the sense of direct verification: the ansatz U(s,y)=αs+tilde U(y) transforms (1.1) into the Riccati equation (2.4), whose solutions are obtained explicitly by substitution and quadrature, with no parameter fitted to the target conclusion. The non-existence of smooth exact self-similar solutions is proved by an independent ODE argument using the intermediate value theorem. The stability theorem (Theorem 1.7) is then built on a spectral framework in which the linearized operator is analyzed directly: the mode-stability step reduces the Heun-type eigen-equation (3.4) by an explicit Lorentz-type transformation to the hypergeometric ODE (3.13), whose connection problem is solved via standard Frobenius theory and coefficient ratio analysis, not by assuming the desired spectrum. The spectral decomposition in Section 4 constructs a modified dissipative operator plus a finite-rank projection using subcoercivity estimates derived from compactness of an embedding, not by postulating the growth bound. The uniform resolvent estimate in Proposition 4.11 is presented as a new technical estimate; even if its proof were incomplete or dimensionally questionable, that would be a correctness or rigor issue, not circularity, because the estimate is not obtained from the theorem it is used to prove. References to Merle-Raphael-Rodnianski-Szeftel [35], Merle-Zaag [38], Donninger, and others are external works used for framework and standard tools, and none of the load-bearing uniqueness or spectral conclusions is justified solely by a self-citation of the present authors. The parameter adjustment (α*,κ*,T*) is the standard modulation/Brouwer fixed-point mechanism for removing unstable modes, and it does not amount to fitting the decay conclusion; rather, the decay is a consequence of the semigroup bound on the stable subspace. Accordingly, there is no exhibited circular step in which a prediction reduces by definition to an input or in which a fitted quantity is renamed as a prediction.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests entirely on standard analytical tools: spectral theory, semigroup theory, hypergeometric ODE theory, and Brouwer's theorem. The five parameters alpha, beta, kappa, T, x0 in the constructed family are explicit labels of the solutions, not hidden fitted constants: they correspond to symmetries or shape degrees of freedom and are not tuned to match any external data. No new particles, forces, or speculative entities are introduced.

assumptions (6)
  • standard math Spectral theory and perturbation theory for linear operators, semigroup generation, and the Gearhart-Pruess-Greiner theorem (Kato [29], Engel-Nagel [23])
    Used throughout Sections 4-6 to analyze the linearized operator, construct Riesz projections, and derive semigroup decay estimates.
  • standard math Frobenius theory and hypergeometric connection formulas (Olver et al. [44], Teschl [50])
    Used in the mode stability proof to characterize smooth solutions of the eigen-equation after the Lorentz transformation (Section 3.2 and Appendix A).
  • standard math Brouwer fixed-point theorem
    Used in Section 6.2 to choose the modulation parameters alpha*, kappa*, T* so that the unstable-mode correction vanishes.
  • domain assumption Solutions are real-valued and smooth in the backward light cone Gamma(T,x0), with T - t > 0
    The self-similar variables s = -log(T-t)+log(T) and y = (x-x0)/(T-t) require T-t > 0 and y in [-1,1] inside the cone.
  • domain assumption alpha > 0 for smoothness of the profiles; for finite beta, sqrt(1+alpha) is a positive integer
    Ensures the explicit profiles have no singularity inside the light cone (Section 2.2, Theorem 1.1). For alpha < 0 or non-integer sqrt(1+alpha) with finite beta, the profiles are singular or only finitely differentiable.
  • domain assumption Finite speed of propagation for the one-dimensional wave equation
    Justifies restricting initial data to the ball B_{T*}(x0) and constructing global-in-space smooth blow-up solutions via cutoff (Remark 1.3, Section 6.3).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Blow-up of the one-dimensional wave equation with quadratic spatial derivative nonlinearity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AVCQDGMN

@misc{pith2026250107887,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Blow-up of the one-dimensional wave equation with quadratic spatial derivative nonlinearity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AVCQDGMN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.07887}
}
read the original abstract

We investigate the blow-up dynamics of smooth solutions to the one-dimensional wave equation with a quadratic spatial derivative nonlinearity, motivated by its applications in Effective Field Theory (EFT) in cosmology. Despite its relevance, explicit blow-up solutions for this equation have not been documented in the literature. In this work, we establish the non-existence of smooth, exact self-similar blow-up solutions and construct a five-parameter family of generalized self-similar solutions exhibiting logarithmic growth. Moreover, we prove the asymptotic stability of these blow-up solutions. Our proof tackles several significant challenges, including the non-self-adjoint nature of the linearized operator, the presence of unstable eigenvalues, and, most notably, the treatment of non-compact perturbations. By substantially advancing Donninger's spectral-theoretic framework, we develop a robust methodology that effectively handles non-compact perturbations. Key innovations include the incorporation of the Lorentz transformation in self-similar variables, an adaptation of the functional framework in [Merle-Raphael-Rodnianski-Szeftel, Invent.Math., 2022], and a novel resolvent estimate. This approach is general and robust, allowing for straightforward extensions to higher dimensions and applications to a wide range of nonlinear equations.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

51 extracted references · 49 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    P.-N. Chen, R. Donninger, I. Glogi´ c, M. McNulty, and B. Sch¨ or khuber. Co-dimension one stable blowup for the quadratic wave equation beyond the light cone . Communications in Mathematical Physics, 405(2):34, 2024

    work page 2024

  2. [2]

    P.-N. Chen, M. McNulty, and B. Sch¨ orkhuber. Singularity formation for the higher dimensional skyrme model in the strong field limit. arXiv preprint arXiv:2310.07042 , 2023. 46

    work page Pith review arXiv 2023

  3. [3]

    C. Collot. Type ii blow up manifolds for the energy supercritical se milinear wave equation. Memoirs of the American Mathematical Society , 252(1205), 2018

    work page 2018

  4. [4]

    Costin, R

    O. Costin, R. Donninger, and I. Glogi´ c. Mode stability of self-sim ilar wave maps in higher dimensions. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 351:959–972, 2017

    work page 2017

  5. [5]

    Costin, R

    O. Costin, R. Donninger, I. Glogi´ c, and M. Huang. On the stabilit y of self-similar solutions to nonlinear wave equations. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 343(1):299–310, 2016

    work page 2016

  6. [6]

    Costin, R

    O. Costin, R. Donninger, and X. Xia. A proof for the mode stability of a self-similar wave map. Nonlinearity, 29(8):2451, 2016

    work page 2016

  7. [7]

    Cˆ ote and H

    R. Cˆ ote and H. Zaag. Construction of a multisoliton blowup solutio n to the semilinear wave equation in one space dimension. Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics , 66(10):1541–1581, 2013

    work page 2013

  8. [8]

    Csobo, I

    E. Csobo, I. Glogi´ c, and B. Sch¨ orkhuber. On blowup for the s upercritical quadratic wave equation. Analysis & PDE , 17(2):617–680, 2024

    work page 2024

Show all 51 references
  1. [9]

    Dai and T

    W. Dai and T. Duyckaerts. Self-similar solutions of focusing semi- linear wave equations in RN . Journal of Evolution Equations , 21:4703–4750, 2021

    2021

  2. [10]

    Donninger

    R. Donninger. On stable self-similar blowup for equivariant wave m aps. Communications on Pure and Applied mathematics , 64(8):1095–1147, 2011

    2011

  3. [11]

    Donninger

    R. Donninger. Strichartz estimates in similarity coordinates and stable blowup for the critical wave equation. Duke Mathematical Journal , 166(9):1627–1683, 2017

    2017

  4. [12]

    Donninger

    R. Donninger. Spectral theory and self-similar blowup in wave eq uations. Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society , 61(4):659–685, 2024

    2024

  5. [13]

    Donninger and Z

    R. Donninger and Z. Rao. Blowup stability at optimal regularity fo r the critical wave equation. Advances in Mathematics , 370:107219, 2020

    2020

  6. [14]

    Donninger and B

    R. Donninger and B. Sch¨ orkhuber. Stable self-similar blow up fo r energy subcritical wave equations. Dynamics of Partial Differential Equations , 9(1):63–87, 2012

    2012

  7. [15]

    Donninger and B

    R. Donninger and B. Sch¨ orkhuber. Stable blow up dynamics for energy supercritical wave equations. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , 366(4):2167–2189, 2014

    2014

  8. [16]

    Donninger and B

    R. Donninger and B. Sch¨ orkhuber. On blowup in supercritical wave equations. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 346:907–943, 2016

    2016

  9. [17]

    Donninger and B

    R. Donninger and B. Sch¨ orkhuber. Stable blowup for wave equ ations in odd space dimensions. In Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar´ e C, Analyse non lin´ eaire, volume 34, pages 1181–1213. Elsevier, 2017

    2017

  10. [18]

    Donninger, B

    R. Donninger, B. Sch¨ orkhuber, and P. C. Aichelburg. On stab le self-similar blow up for equivariant wave maps: the linearized problem. In Annales Henri Poincar´ e, volume 13, pages 103–144. Springer, 2012. 47

    2012

  11. [19]

    Donninger and D

    R. Donninger and D. Wallauch. Optimal blowup stability for superc ritical wave maps. Advances in Mathematics , 433:109291, 2023

    2023

  12. [20]

    Duyckaerts, C

    T. Duyckaerts, C. E. Kenig, and F. Merle. Universality of the blo w-up profile for small type ii blow-up solutions of the energy-critical wave equation: the nonr adial case. Journal of the European Mathematical Society, 14(5):1389–1454, 2012

    2012

  13. [21]

    Duyckaerts and G

    T. Duyckaerts and G. Negro. Global solutions with asymptotic s elf-similar behaviour for the cubic wave equation. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 405(3):84, 2024

    2024

  14. [22]

    Eckmann, F

    J.-P. Eckmann, F. Hassani, and H. Zaag. Instabilities appearing in cosmological effective field theories: when and how? Nonlinearity, 36(9):4844, 2023

    2023

  15. [23]

    Engel, R

    K.-J. Engel, R. Nagel, and S. Brendle. One-parameter semigroups for linear evolution equations, volume 194. Springer, 2000

    2000

  16. [24]

    Ghoul, S

    T. Ghoul, S. Ibrahim, and V. T. Nguyen. Construction of type I I blowup solutions for the 1-corotational energy supercritical wave maps. J. Differential Equations , 265(7):2968–3047, 2018

    2018

  17. [25]

    Glogi´ c, M

    I. Glogi´ c, M. Maliborski, and B. Sch¨ orkhuber. Threshold forblowup for the supercritical cubic wave equation. Nonlinearity, 33(5):2143, 2020

    2020

  18. [26]

    Glogi´ c and B

    I. Glogi´ c and B. Sch¨ orkhuber. Co-dimension one stable blowup for the supercritical cubic wave equation. Advances in Mathematics , 390:107930, 2021

    2021

  19. [27]

    Hassani, P

    F. Hassani, P. Shi, J. Adamek, M. Kunz, and P. Wittwer. New non linear instability for scalar fields. Physical Review D , 105(2):L021304, 2022

    2022

  20. [28]

    Hillairet, P

    M. Hillairet, P. Rapha¨ el, et al. Smooth type ii blow-up solutions to the four-dimensional energy-critical wave equation. Anal. PDE , 5(4):777–829, 2012

    2012

  21. [29]

    T. Kato. Perturbation theory for linear operators . Classics in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1995. Reprint of the 1980 edition

    1995

  22. [30]

    J. Kim. Self-similar blow up for energy supercritical semilinear wav e equation. arXiv preprint arXiv:2211.13699, 2022

    2022 arXiv

  23. [31]

    J. Krieger. On stability of type II blow up for the critical nonlinea r wave equation on R3+1. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. , 267(1301):v + 129, 2020

    2020

  24. [32]

    Krieger and W

    J. Krieger and W. Schlag. Full range of blow up exponents for th e quintic wave equation in three dimensions. Journal de Math´ ematiques Pures et Appliqu´ ees, 101(6):873–900, 2014

    2014

  25. [33]

    Krieger, W

    J. Krieger, W. Schlag, and D. Tataru. Slow blow-up solutions for the h1(R3) critical focusing semilinear wave equation. Duke Mathematical Journal , 147(1):1, 2009

    2009

  26. [34]

    M. McNulty. Singularity formation for the higher dimensional sky rme model. arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.15345, 2024

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Merle, P

    F. Merle, P. Rapha¨ el, I. Rodnianski, and J. Szeftel. On blow up f or the energy super critical defocusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations. Invent. Math. , 227(1):247–413, 2022. 48

    2022

  28. [36]

    Merle and H

    F. Merle and H. Zaag. Determination of the blow-up rate for the semilinear wave equation. American journal of mathematics , 125(5):1147–1164, 2003

    2003

  29. [37]

    Merle and H

    F. Merle and H. Zaag. Determination of the blow-up rate for a cr itical semilinear wave equation. Mathematische Annalen , 331(2):395–416, 2005

    2005

  30. [38]

    Merle and H

    F. Merle and H. Zaag. Existence and universality of the blow-up p rofile for the semilinear wave equation in one space dimension. Journal of Functional Analysis , 253(1):43–121, 2007

    2007

  31. [39]

    Merle and H

    F. Merle and H. Zaag. Openness of the set of non-characteris tic points and regularity of the blow-up curve for the 1 d semilinear wave equation. Communications in mathematical physics , 282(1):55–86, 2008

    2008

  32. [40]

    Merle and H

    F. Merle and H. Zaag. Existence and classification of character istic points at blow-up for a semi- linear wave equation in one space dimension. American Journal of Mathematics , 134(3):581– 648, 2012

    2012

  33. [41]

    Merle and H

    F. Merle and H. Zaag. Isolatedness of characteristic points at blowup for a 1-dimensional semilinear wave equation. Duke Mathematical Journal , 161(15):2837–2908, 2012

    2012

  34. [42]

    Merle and H

    F. Merle and H. Zaag. On the stability of the notion of non-chara cteristic point and blow-up profile for semilinear wave equations. Communications in Mathematical Physics , 333(3):1529– 1562, 2015

    2015

  35. [43]

    Merle and H

    F. Merle and H. Zaag. Dynamics near explicit stationary solutions in similarity variables for solutions of a semilinear wave equation in higher dimensions. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 368(1):27–87, 2016

    2016

  36. [44]

    F. W. Olver, D. W. Lozier, R. F. Boisvert, and C. W. Clark. NIST handbook of mathematical functions. Cambridge university press, 2010

    2010

  37. [45]

    Ostermann

    M. Ostermann. Stable blowup for focusing semilinear wave equat ions in all dimensions. Trans- actions of the American Mathematical Society , 2024

    2024

  38. [46]

    M. Rammaha. Upper bounds for the life span of solutions to syst ems of nonlinear wave equa- tions in two and three space dimensions. Nonlinear Analysis: Theory, Methods & Applications , 25(6):639–654, 1995

    1995

  39. [47]

    M. Rammaha. A note on a nonlinear wave equation in two and three space dimensions. Communications in Partial Differential Equations , 22(5-6):799–810, 1997

    1997

  40. [48]

    Sasaki, S

    T. Sasaki, S. Takamatsu, and H. Takamura. The lifespan of clas sical solutions of one dimen- sional wave equations with semilinear terms of the spatial derivative . AIMS Mathematics , 8(11):25477–25486, 2023

    2023

  41. [49]

    K. Shao, H. Takamura, and C. Wang. Blow-up of solutions to sem ilinear wave equations with spatial derivatives. arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.02098 , 2024

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    G. Teschl. Ordinary differential equations and dynamical systems , volume 140 of Graduate Studies in Mathematics . American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2012

    2012

  43. [51]

    Wallauch

    D. Wallauch. Strichartz estimates and blowup stability for energ y critical nonlinear wave equations. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society , 376(06):4321–4360, 2023. 49

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.