Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Assessing the dark matter content of two quasar host galaxies at z~6 through gas kinematics

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Two quasars at redshift six appear to live in dark-matter-dominated host galaxies, with dark matter fractions near 0.6 and 0.5 within the effective radius.

desk verdict First z~6 fDM estimates from gas kinematics are worth taking seriously, but the radius definition mismatch with the comparison sample means the headline 'DM dominated' claim is not yet supported. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.09077 v2 pith:4BWY6XWV submitted 2025-01-15 astro-ph.GA

Qinyue Fei , John D. Silverman , Seiji Fujimoto , Ran Wang , Luis C. Ho , Manuela Bischetti , Stefano Carniani , Michele Ginolfi
show 6 more authors
Gareth C. Jones Roberto Maiolino Wiphu Rujopakarn N. M. Förster Schreiber Juan M. Espejo Salcedo Lilian L. Lee
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords quasarhostgalaxiesdarkmatterfractionrotationcurves[CII]kinematicsz~6quasarsALMAsupermassiveblackholesgalaxyevolution
topics Dark Matter
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses ALMA observations of the [C ii] 158 micron line to measure gas rotation in two quasar host galaxies at $z\gtrsim6$, combining high- and low-resolution data to trace the velocity field from the inner galaxy out to roughly 8 kiloparsecs. The authors argue that both systems are rotating disks with $V_{\rm rot}/\sigma\approx2$, and that decomposing the rotation curves into stars, gas, and a dark halo yields dark matter fractions within the effective radius of $f_{\rm DM}(R

What carries the argument

The central object is the rotation curve of the [C ii]-emitting gas, built from ALMA observations at two angular resolutions. The machinery is forward modeling with DysmalPy, which constructs a three-component mass model (stellar bulge, gaseous disk, and an NFW dark matter halo; NFW is the Navarro-Frenk-White density profile) and predicts the observed data cube, plus 3DBarolo, a tilted-ring model that recovers rotation velocities non-parametrically. The key step is that the low-resolution data reach radii of 6-8 kpc where the dark halo dominates the circular velocity, so the dark matter fraction inside the effective radius can be determined rather than treated as a nuisance parameter.

What would settle it

A JWST measurement of the stellar light of P009-10 and J2318-3029 that puts their stellar masses near $10^{11}\,M_\odot$ rather than the fitted $\sim10^{10.5}\,M_\odot$ would lower the inferred dark matter fractions below the quoted values and falsify the claim that these hosts are dark-matter dominated. An independent constraint on the halo concentration from the full rotation curve shape would also settle whether the virial masses are actually $\gtrsim10^{12.5}\,M_\odot$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that two $z\sim6$ quasar hosts are dark-matter-dominated systems on kiloparsec scales. Using [C ii] emission as a dynamical tracer, the authors recover extended rotation curves that stay flat or keep rising out to 6-8 kpc, well beyond the likely stellar distribution, in contrast to the declining curves found for many massive star-forming galaxies at $z\sim2$. Forward modeling of the mass distribution gives $f_{\rm DM}(R<R_e)=0.61^{+0.08}_{-0.08}$ for P009-10 and $0.53^{+0.21}_{-0.23}$ for J2318-3029, with inferred halo masses of $\sim10^{12.85}$ and $\sim10^{12.50}\,M_\odot$ under an NFW profile with concentration 3.5. The authors show these values are stable under changes in S\'ersic indices, disk thicknesses, and inclination, and that adding low-resolution data is what breaks the degeneracy between baryonic mass and dark matter fraction. They further find that the black hole masses, while roughly ten times above the local $M_{\rm BH}$-stellar-mass relation, sit closer to the local $M_{\rm BH}$-halo-mass relation, suggesting halo mass rather than stellar mass may set the scale for the first supermassive black holes.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the dark matter halo follows a standard NFW density profile with a concentration fixed to 3.5; if the real concentration is higher or lower, the inferred total halo mass changes by up to two orders of magnitude.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The dark matter fraction at $z\sim6$ does not follow the extrapolated decline from cosmic noon; massive quasar hosts can be dark-matter dominated already at this epoch.
  • Halo masses of $\sim10^{12.5}$-$10^{12.8}\,M_\odot$ make these quasars tracers of the most massive halos at $z\sim6$, testable through galaxy overdensity and clustering.
  • The offset from the local black hole-stellar mass relation combined with the proximity to the black hole-halo mass relation suggests the halo, not the stellar bulge, is the regulating reservoir for early black hole growth.
  • Deep low-resolution ALMA data are essential: with high-resolution data alone, the dark matter fraction of J2318-3029 is essentially unconstrained.
  • Flattened or rising rotation curves at large radius imply that pressure support must be removed via asymmetric drift correction before computing circular velocities.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the fixed NFW concentration of 3.5 is relaxed, the paper's own tests show the virial halo mass shifts by roughly two orders of magnitude, so the 'most massive halo' conclusion is weaker than the dark matter fraction measurement itself.
  • The same high-plus-low-resolution [C ii] approach could be applied to non-quasar galaxies at $z>6$, testing whether these high dark matter fractions are intrinsic to massive halos or a selection effect of quasar environments.
  • Direct JWST imaging of the host starlight would replace the assumed stellar S\'ersic index and thickness with measured values, turning the quoted uncertainties on $f_{\rm DM}(R<R_e)$ into a sharper test.
  • A larger sample spanning a range of quasar luminosity would show whether the alignment with the local $M_{\rm BH}$-$M_{\rm halo}$ relation is a genuine evolutionary link or a consequence of selecting the most luminous systems.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents ALMA [C II] observations of two z~6 quasar host galaxies (P009-10 and J2318-3029), combining high- and low-resolution data to recover extended emission. Using two independent modeling tools (DysmalPy and 3DBarolo), the authors derive rotation curves out to ~6-8 kpc and decompose the mass into baryonic and dark matter components. They report dark matter fractions fDM(R<Re)=0.61(+0.08,-0.08) and 0.53(+0.20,-0.23), infer halo masses log Mh~12.5-12.8 Msun, and argue that these quasars reside in the most massive halos at their epoch, with SMBH masses aligned with a local MBH-Mh relation rather than the MBH-Mstar relation.

Significance. If the central results hold, this would be one of the first direct dynamical measurements of dark matter content in quasar host galaxies at z~6, providing unique constraints on early structure formation and SMBH-host co-evolution. The paper has notable strengths: it makes use of both compact and extended ALMA configurations, applies a JvM beam correction, cross-checks the kinematics with two independent modeling codes, and includes Monte Carlo robustness tests showing that fDM(R<Re) is largely stable against variations in Sersic index, axis ratio, and halo concentration. However, the headline comparison with lower-redshift studies is undermined by an inconsistency in the definition of effective radius, and the halo mass inference depends strongly on a fixed NFW concentration. These issues affect the paper's main astrophysical claims, though they appear addressable with additional analysis.

major comments (3)
  1. [Table 3 and Fig. 7] The quoted fDM(R<Re) uses the gas half-mass radius, as stated in the note to Table 3 ('Re denotes the half mass radius of the gas component'), whereas the lower-redshift comparison in Fig. 7 (e.g., Nestor Shachar et al. 2023) is based on the stellar effective radius. The fitted values are Rgas=2.77 kpc and Rstar=1.96 kpc for P009-10, and Rgas=2.57 kpc and Rstar=1.30 kpc for J2318-3029. Since the dark matter fraction increases with radius, the values at the stellar effective radius will be lower than the quoted numbers; for J2318-3029, where Rstar is roughly half of Rgas, fDM(Rstar) could fall below 0.5. This would weaken or invalidate the claim that both systems are dark-matter-dominated and that the fractions are significantly larger than the lower-redshift extrapolation. Please recompute fDM at the stellar effective radius (or provide a radial profile of fDM) and restrict the comparison in Fig. 7 to a consistent definition of Re.
  2. [Sec. 5.2 and Fig. 9] The virial halo masses quoted in Table 3 and the abstract (log Mh~10^12.5-10^12.8 Msun) are not direct measurements but are extrapolated from the fitted fDM(R<Re) under the assumption of an NFW profile with a fixed concentration c=3.5. Fig. 9 shows that log Mh varies by roughly 2 dex when c is allowed to range from 1.5 to 5.5, and the text acknowledges this. The conclusion that these quasars reside in 'the most massive halos at these redshifts' is therefore contingent on the adopted concentration and is not a robust inference from the data alone. I recommend marginalizing over c with a physically motivated prior (e.g., from Dutton & Maccio 2014 or Diemer & Kravtsov 2015) or, at minimum, presenting the halo mass as a function of c and softening the abstract/conclusion statements accordingly.
  3. [Sec. 3.1] The filtering of 'non-circular' components in P009-10 is a potentially large intervention: residual Gaussian components are subtracted from the data cube before the kinematic fitting. The assumption that these components are non-gravitational and can be removed is not directly tested. If the removed emission actually traces part of the gravitational potential (e.g., a merger or an infalling clump), the derived fDM(R<Re) could be biased. The virial-theorem consistency check in Sec. 5.7 indicates that the total dynamical mass within ~3 kpc is consistent with the rotating-disk model, but it does not validate the dark matter fraction itself. Please quantify how the filtering changes the fitted fDM (for example, by running the DysmalPy fit on the unfiltered cube and comparing the results), or provide additional justification that the removed components do not affect the mass decomposition.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Sec. 4.5] The abstract and Sec. 4.5 state fDM(R<Re) without specifying that Re is the gas half-mass radius; please define this explicitly in both places, and ideally add a note whenever referring to 'effective radius' to avoid confusion with the stellar effective radius used in the literature comparison.
  2. [Fig. 7 caption] The caption should state which effective radius is used for each dataset (stellar for lower-redshift points, gas for the present work) so that the reader can immediately see the potential inconsistency.
  3. [Sec. 3.2] The dark matter fraction fDM(R<Re) is a fitted parameter with a flat prior [0,1], and the halo mass is derived from it; phrases such as 'we find' or 'the dynamic measurements indicate' (e.g., Sec. 4.5) could be phrased as 'we fit' to avoid implying an independent measurement.
  4. [Sec. 5.7 and Conclusions] The paper acknowledges in Sec. 5.7 that 'we cannot entirely rule out the possibility that the observed kinematics are affected by these effects,' yet the Conclusions present the dark-matter-dominated result without this caveat; please carry the caveat through to the summary.
  5. [Sec. 5.2] There is a typo: 'hugh fraction' should be 'huge fraction'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the dark-matter fraction is a fitted parameter constrained by external ALMA kinematics, and the halo masses are explicitly derived from that fit under an assumed NFW profile, not from a theory that already contains the result.

full rationale

The central derivation chain is observational: ALMA [CII] data cubes are modeled with DysmalPy (Sec. 3.2), producing rotation curves that are compared with the independent 3DBarolo estimates (Sec. 4.3), and the mass decomposition then fits fDM(R<Re) as a free parameter with a flat prior (Sec. 3.2). The halo mass is not independently predicted; it is transparently linked to the fitted fDM and baryonic mass under an NFW profile with concentration fixed to c=3.5 (Table 3 note 11; Sec. 4.5). No equation in the paper defines the observed rotation curve in terms of fDM or Mh; instead, the kinematics are the external input. The paper itself flags the model-dependence of the halo-mass extrapolation in Sec. 5.2, where log Mh varies by about 2 dex with concentration, and it cautions in Sec. 5.4 that the sample of two objects limits definitive conclusions. The comparison in Fig. 7 mixes the gas half-mass radius used here with the stellar effective radius used in lower-redshift studies, an apples-to-oranges systematic issue rather than a circular one. Self-citations (Fei et al. 2023 for the 3DBarolo procedure; Fujimoto et al. in prep. for sample selection) are methodological or data-selection references and are not used to justify the mass-decomposition result. Therefore, no step in the derivation reduces by construction to its own input, and the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 10 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The mass model has nine fitted parameters plus several fixed shape parameters. The central fDM is a fitted quantity; the halo mass is a model extrapolation depending strongly on the assumed concentration. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (10)
  • Dark matter fraction fDM(R<Re) = 0.61(+0.08,-0.08) for P009-10; 0.53(+0.21,-0.23) for J2318-3029
    Free parameter with flat prior [0,1] in DysmalPy; this is the headline measurement, not an independently predicted quantity.
  • Total baryonic mass log(Mbar/Msun) = 10.84(+0.12,-0.13) and 10.72(+0.22,-0.29)
    Free parameter with uniform prior [9,12]; degenerate with fDM and fstar.
  • Stellar mass fraction fstar = 0.50(+0.15,-0.17) and 0.54(+0.21,-0.21)
    Free parameter with flat prior [0,1]; stellar mass is not directly observed.
  • Stellar effective radius Rstar = 1.96(+0.41,-0.44) kpc and 1.30(+0.76,-0.45) kpc
    Free parameter [0,3] kpc; no direct stellar light data.
  • Gas effective radius Rgas = 2.77(+0.51,-0.75) kpc and 2.57(+1.13,-0.86) kpc
    Free parameter [0.1,5] kpc; used to define Re for fDM.
  • Halo concentration c = Fixed to 3.5
    Chosen from Dutton and Maccio (2014) mass-concentration relation; log Mh shifts by about 2 dex across c=1.5 to 5.5 (Fig. 9).
  • Sersic index of stellar component nstar = Fixed to 1.0
    Chosen from Ding et al. (2023) quasar hosts; affects potential shape.
  • Inverse axis ratio of gas qgas^-1 = Fixed to 5
    Assumed disk-like geometry from z~2 disks; affects potential shape.
  • Velocity dispersion sigma = Approximately 111 to 125 km/s for both targets
    Free parameter [5,200] km/s; enters the asymmetric drift correction.
  • Inclination i = P009-10: 37 to 40 degrees; J2318-3029: 18 to 23 degrees
    Free parameter; affects circular velocity and mass scale.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption [CII] emission originates from a gas disk in regular rotation governed by the gravitational potential
    Stated in Sec. 3; if gas is outflowing or merging, mass decomposition is invalid.
  • domain assumption Velocity dispersion is locally isotropic and radially uniform in DysmalPy
    Sec. 3.2, Eq. (1); pressure support term uses a single sigma.
  • domain assumption Dark matter halo follows an NFW profile with concentration fixed to 3.5
    Sec. 3.2; halo mass is extrapolated from inner fDM.
  • ad hoc to paper Stellar mass is distributed as an oblate spheroid with nstar=1 and q^-1=1
    Sec. 3.2; no direct stellar light observation is available.
  • ad hoc to paper Gas disk thickness qgas^-1=5
    Sec. 3.2; based on z~2 disks, not measured for these targets.
  • ad hoc to paper Residual Gaussian components in P009-10 are non-gravitational and can be removed before fitting
    Sec. 3.1; filtering changes the data cube used for the rotation curve.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Assessing the dark matter content of two quasar host galaxies at z~6 through gas kinematics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/4BWY6XWV

@misc{pith2026250109077,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Assessing the dark matter content of two quasar host galaxies at z~6 through gas kinematics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/4BWY6XWV}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.09077}
}
abstract

We conduct a study of the gas kinematics of two quasar host galaxies at $z\gtrsim6$ traced by the [CII] emission line using ALMA. By combining deep observations at both low and high resolution, we recover the diffuse emission, resolve its structure, and measure the rotation curves from the inner region of the galaxy to its outskirts using DysmalPy and 3DBarolo. Assuming that both galaxies exhibit disk rotation driven by the gravitational potential of the galaxy, we find that the best-fit disk models have a $V_{\rm rot}/\sigma \approx 2$ and inferred circular velocities out to $\sim$6-8 kpc scales, well beyond the likely stellar distribution. We then determine the mass profiles of each component (stars, gas, dark matter) with priors on the baryon and dark matter properties. We find relatively large dark matter fractions within their effective radii ($f_{\rm DM}(R<R_e)$ = $0.61_{-0.08}^{+0.08}$ and $0.53_{-0.23}^{+0.21}$, respectively), which are significantly larger than those extrapolated from lower redshift studies and remain robust under different input parameters verified by Monte-Carlo simulations. The large $f_{\rm DM}(R<R_e)$ corresponds to halo masses of $\sim 10^{12.5}-10^{12.8}\, M_\odot$, thus representative of the most massive halos at these redshifts. Notably, while the masses of these SMBHs are approximately 1 dex higher than the low-redshift relationship with stellar mass, the closer alignment of SMBH and halo masses with a local relationship may indicate that the early formation of these SMBHs is linked to their dark matter halos, providing insights into the co-evolution of galaxies and black holes in the early universe.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.09077 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. [C ii] intensity maps of P009−10 (left) and J2318−3029 (right) for the low-resolution data. Black contours represent the 2,3,4,5,7,8,10,20,30 × σ, where σ is the root mean square (rms) noise of the line-free region in the corresponding intensity map. Magenta contours represent the [C ii] intensity of the high-resolution data, at levels of 2,4,6,8,10,12×σ. The white and orange dashed curves represent the -2σ of low a… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Comparing the [C ii] emission before and after filtering. Panel (a) and (d): The line-of-sight velocity map generated from the original data cube (a) and after applying the filter (d). Panel (b) and (c): Position-Velocity (PV) diagram extracted from the major- and minor-axis of the original cube (blue contours) and after filtering application (red contours). The major￾and minor-axis are shown as the black line in pa… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Observed and model [C ii] los-velocity (top) and dispersion (bottom) maps (low-resolution data) of P009−10. In each sub-panel, the first row presents the observed [C ii] moment maps (column 1) with the best-fit kinematic model (column 2), with the top row showing the model from DysmalPy and the bottom row showing the 3DBarolo results. The third column displays the residual from the fit to the velocity map for the co… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (11 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Similar to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Rotation curves for P009−10 (left column) and J2318−3029 (right column). Top row: Rotation velocity and velocity dispersion derived from the best-fit DysmalPy and 3DBarolo models. Open circles and squares denote the values from high- and low-resolution data, respective…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Left panel: Velocity dispersion versus redshift for our targets (red stars) and galaxies from the literature with observations of CO or [C i] (yellow; Hodge et al. 2012; Rizzo et al. 2023; Lelli et al. 2023; Liu et al. 2024), [C ii] (gray; Rizzo et al. 2020, 2021; Lell…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Evolution of fDM(R < Re). The fDM(R < Re) of massive star-forming galaxies at z ∼ 2 are represented as open circles (binned from light gray triangles, Nestor Shachar et al. 2023), and that of several dusty star-forming galaxies at z ∼ 4 are shown as open hexagons (Rizz…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Normalized rotation curves for our targets (red and blue), and comparison with massive star-forming galax￾ies at relatively lower redshift. The gray data points repre￾sent the first six galaxies reported by Genzel et al. (2017), and the gray dashed line denotes the ave…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: The best-fit dark-matter fraction within the effective radius (left column) and the virial mass of the dark matter halo (right column) are estimated by fixing the model parameters to different values. The rows from top to bottom illustrate the effects of varying the ha…
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison between the dark matter halo mass of quasars with redshifts. The gray data points represent the halo mass measured through analyzing the galaxy clustering (Croom et al. 2005; Shen et al. 2007; Chen et al. 2022; Arita et al. 2023; Eilers et al. 2024), and th…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Posterior distribution functions (PDFs) of baryonic mass (log Mb), the ratio between stellar mass and baryon mass (fs), the dark matter fraction within the effective radius fDM(R < Re) and the dark matter halo mass (log Mh) for P009−10 (left panel) and J2318−3029 (rig…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Comparison of the synthesized beam and data products before and after applying the JvM correction. The top row indicates P009−10 and the bottom row illustrates J2318−3029. (a) The sky response (dirty beam) recovered from the CASA CLEAN process, with contour levels at …
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: The left column displays the [C ii] intensity maps of our targets produced using the default clean procedure, while the right column shows the [C ii] intensity maps after applying the JvM correction. Contours in each panel represent levels of [-2, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 10, 1…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Testing CCC+TL Cosmology with Galaxy Rotation Curves

    astro-ph.CO 2025-09 reject novelty 5.0 of 10

    A covarying-coupling-constant cosmology with a locally varying parameter X is shown to reproduce the rotation curves of seven SPARC galaxies without dark matter, by fitting a single turn-off density parameter.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

169 extracted references · 5 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    2024, Nature, 627, 281, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07053-4

    Abuter, R., Allouche, F., Amorim, A., et al. 2024, Nature, 627, 281, doi: 10.1038/s41586-024-07053-4

    doi:10.1038/s41586-024-07053-4 2024

  2. [2]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.01918, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.01918

    Amvrosiadis, A., Lange, S., Nightingale, J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.01918, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.01918

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.01918 2024

  3. [3]

    2023, ApJ, 954, 210, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace43a Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T

    Arita, J., Kashikawa, N., Matsuoka, Y., et al. 2023, ApJ, 954, 210, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ace43a Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Ba˜ nados, E., Venemans, B. P., Mazzucchelli, C., et al. 2018, Nature, 553, 473, doi: 10.1038/nature25180 Ba˜ nados, E., Novak, M., Neelema...

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ace43a 2023

  4. [4]

    H., Hearin, A

    Behroozi, P., Wechsler, R. H., Hearin, A. P., & Conroy, C. 2019, MNRAS, 488, 3143, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz1182

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stz1182 2019

  5. [5]

    Malkan, M. A. 2011, ApJ, 742, 107, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/742/2/107

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/742/2/107 2011

  6. [6]

    N., Treu, T., Ding, X., et al

    Bennert, V. N., Treu, T., Ding, X., et al. 2021, ApJ, 921, 36, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac151a Bewketu Belete, A., Andreani, P., Fern´ andez-Ontiveros, J. A., et al. 2021, A&A, 654, A24, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202140492

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ac151a 2021

  7. [7]

    2021, A&A, 645, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039057

    Bischetti, M., Feruglio, C., Piconcelli, E., et al. 2021, A&A, 645, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039057

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202039057 2021

  8. [8]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.12443, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.12443 Bouch´ e, N., Carfantan, H., Schroetter, I., Michel-Dansac, L., & Contini, T

    Bischetti, M., Choi, H., Fiore, F., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.12443, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.12443 Bouch´ e, N., Carfantan, H., Schroetter, I., Michel-Dansac, L., & Contini, T. 2015, AJ, 150, 92, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/150/3/92

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2404.12443 2024

Show all 169 references
  1. [9]

    S., Kravtsov, A

    Bullock, J. S., Kravtsov, A. V., & Weinberg, D. H. 2001, ApJ, 548, 33, doi: 10.1086/318681

    2001 doi

  2. [10]

    2010, ApJ, 725, 2324, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/725/2/2324

    Burkert, A., Genzel, R., Bouch´ e, N., et al. 2010, ApJ, 725, 2324, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/725/2/2324

    2010 doi

  3. [11]

    M., Genzel, R., et al

    Burkert, A., F¨ orster Schreiber, N. M., Genzel, R., et al. 2016, ApJ, 826, 214, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/826/2/214

    2016 doi

  4. [12]

    2015, A&A, 580, A102, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526557

    Carniani, S., Marconi, A., Maiolino, R., et al. 2015, A&A, 580, A102, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201526557

    2015 doi

  5. [13]

    Chen, H., Eilers, A.-C., Bosman, S. E. I., et al. 2022, ApJ, 931, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac658d

    2022 doi

  6. [14]

    2015, A&A, 574, A14, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424980

    Cicone, C., Maiolino, R., Gallerani, S., et al. 2015, A&A, 574, A14, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201424980

    2015 doi

  7. [15]

    2011, ApJL, 741, L11, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/741/1/L11

    Cisternas, M., Jahnke, K., Bongiorno, A., et al. 2011, ApJL, 741, L11, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/741/1/L11

    2011 doi

  8. [17]

    R., Dehnen, W., & Wilkinson, M

    Cole, D. R., Dehnen, W., & Wilkinson, M. I. 2011, MNRAS, 416, 1118, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19110.x

    2011

  9. [18]

    2013, ARA&A, 51, 393, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141017

    Conroy, C. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 393, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141017

    2013 doi

  10. [19]

    2000, MNRAS, 311, 441, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03075.x

    Corbelli, E., & Salucci, P. 2000, MNRAS, 311, 441, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03075.x

    2000

  11. [20]

    2024, MNRAS, 531, 930, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1157

    Costa, T. 2024, MNRAS, 531, 930, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1157

    2024 doi

  12. [21]

    M., & Holtzman, J

    Courteau, S., McDonald, M., Widrow, L. M., & Holtzman, J. 2007, ApJL, 655, L21, doi: 10.1086/511524

    2007 doi

  13. [22]

    Cresci, G., Hicks, E. K. S., Genzel, R., et al. 2009, ApJ, 697, 115, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/697/1/115

    2009 doi

  14. [23]

    M., Boyle, B

    Croom, S. M., Boyle, B. J., Shanks, T., et al. 2005, MNRAS, 356, 415, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.08379.x

    2005

  15. [24]

    A., Teague, R., et al

    Czekala, I., Loomis, R. A., Teague, R., et al. 2021, ApJS, 257, 2, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ac1430

    2021 doi

  16. [25]

    M., Cresci, G., et al

    Davies, R., F¨ orster Schreiber, N. M., Cresci, G., et al. 2011, ApJ, 741, 69, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/741/2/69

    2011 doi

  17. [26]

    I., Tacconi, L

    Davies, R. I., Tacconi, L. J., & Genzel, R. 2004a, ApJ, 602, 148, doi: 10.1086/380995 —. 2004b, ApJ, 613, 781, doi: 10.1086/423315

    doi

  18. [27]

    I., Maciejewski, W., Hicks, E

    Davies, R. I., Maciejewski, W., Hicks, E. K. S., et al. 2014a, ApJ, 792, 101, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/792/2/101 —. 2014b, ApJ, 792, 101, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/792/2/101 de Blok, W. J. G., Walter, F., Brinks, E., et al. 2008, AJ, 136, 2648, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2648 de ...

    2008 doi

  19. [28]

    P., et al

    Decarli, R., Walter, F., Venemans, B. P., et al. 2018, ApJ, 854, 97, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa5aa

    2018 doi

  20. [29]

    2019, ApJ, 880, 157, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab297f

    Decarli, R., Dotti, M., Ba˜ nados, E., et al. 2019, ApJ, 880, 157, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab297f

    2019 doi

  21. [30]

    2022, A&A, 662, A60, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142871

    Decarli, R., Pensabene, A., Venemans, B., et al. 2022, A&A, 662, A60, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142871

    2022 doi

  22. [31]

    P., et al

    Decarli, R., Loiacono, F., Farina, E. P., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.06697, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2406.06697

    2024 doi arXiv

  23. [32]

    2022, PASA, 39, e059, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2022.43

    Deg, N., Spekkens, K., Westmeier, T., et al. 2022, PASA, 39, e059, doi: 10.1017/pasa.2022.43

    2022 doi

  24. [33]

    2006, MNRAS, 368, 2, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10145.x

    Dekel, A., & Birnboim, Y. 2006, MNRAS, 368, 2, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10145.x

    2006

  25. [34]

    2022, MNRAS, 511, 316, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3810

    Dekel, A., Mandelker, N., Bournaud, F., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 511, 316, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab3810

    2022 doi

  26. [35]

    2009, ApJ, 703, 785, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/703/1/785

    Dekel, A., Sari, R., & Ceverino, D. 2009, ApJ, 703, 785, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/703/1/785

    2009 doi

  27. [36]

    1986, ApJ, 303, 39, doi: 10.1086/164050 Di Matteo, T., Khandai, N., DeGraf, C., et al

    Dekel, A., & Silk, J. 1986, ApJ, 303, 39, doi: 10.1086/164050 Di Matteo, T., Khandai, N., DeGraf, C., et al. 2012, ApJL, 745, L29, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/745/2/L29 Rotation curves of twoz ∼ 6 quasars 29 Di Matteo, T., Springel, V., & Hernquist, L. 2005, Nature, 433, 604, doi: ...

    1986 doi

  28. [37]

    Diemer, B., & Kravtsov, A. V. 2015, ApJ, 799, 108, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/799/1/108

    2015 doi

  29. [38]

    D., & Onoue, M

    Ding, X., Silverman, J. D., & Onoue, M. 2022, ApJL, 939, L28, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac9c02

    2022 doi

  30. [39]

    2020, ApJ, 888, 37, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5b90

    Ding, X., Silverman, J., Treu, T., et al. 2020, ApJ, 888, 37, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5b90

    2020 doi

  31. [40]

    D., et al

    Ding, X., Onoue, M., Silverman, J. D., et al. 2023, Nature, 621, 51, doi: 10.1038/s41586-023-06345-5

    2023 doi

  32. [41]

    A., & Macci` o, A

    Dutton, A. A., & Macci` o, A. V. 2014, MNRAS, 441, 3359, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu742

    2014 doi

  33. [42]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.07986, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2403.07986

    Eilers, A.-C., Mackenzie, R., Pizzati, E., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.07986, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2403.07986

    2024 doi arXiv

  34. [43]

    2001, ApJ, 560, 636, doi: 10.1086/322516

    El-Zant, A., Shlosman, I., & Hoffman, Y. 2001, ApJ, 560, 636, doi: 10.1086/322516

    2001 doi

  35. [44]

    2009, A&A, 504, 789, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200911995

    Epinat, B., Contini, T., Le F` evre, O., et al. 2009, A&A, 504, 789, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/200911995

    2009 doi

  36. [45]

    2023, ApJ, 946, 45, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acbb05

    Fei, Q., Wang, R., Molina, J., et al. 2023, ApJ, 946, 45, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acbb05

    2023 doi

  37. [46]

    2002, ApJ, 578, 90, doi: 10.1086/342308

    Ferrarese, L. 2002, ApJ, 578, 90, doi: 10.1086/342308

    2002 doi

  38. [47]

    2000, ApJL, 539, L9, doi: 10.1086/312838

    Ferrarese, L., & Merritt, D. 2000, ApJL, 539, L9, doi: 10.1086/312838

    2000 doi

  39. [48]

    2010, A&A, 518, L155, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015164 F¨ orster Schreiber, N

    Feruglio, C., Maiolino, R., Piconcelli, E., et al. 2010, A&A, 518, L155, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201015164 F¨ orster Schreiber, N. M., Renzini, A., Mancini, C., et al. 2018, ApJS, 238, 21, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/aadd49 F¨ orster Schreiber, N. M.,¨Ubler, H., Davies, R. L., et al...

    2010 doi

  40. [49]

    2021, A&A, 647, A194, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039807

    Fraternali, F., Karim, A., Magnelli, B., et al. 2021, A&A, 647, A194, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202039807

    2021 doi

  41. [50]

    2020, MNRAS, 491, 4523, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3306

    Freundlich, J., Dekel, A., Jiang, F., et al. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 4523, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz3306

    2020 doi

  42. [51]

    2019, ApJ, 887, 107, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab480f

    Fujimoto, S., Ouchi, M., Ferrara, A., et al. 2019, ApJ, 887, 107, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab480f

    2019 doi

  43. [52]

    2021, ApJ, 911, 99, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abd7ec

    Fujimoto, S., Oguri, M., Brammer, G., et al. 2021, ApJ, 911, 99, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abd7ec

    2021 doi

  44. [53]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2402.18543, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2402.18543

    Fujimoto, S., Ouchi, M., Kohno, K., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2402.18543, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2402.18543

    2024 doi arXiv

  45. [54]

    2000, ApJL, 539, L13, doi: 10.1086/312840

    Gebhardt, K., Bender, R., Bower, G., et al. 2000, ApJL, 539, L13, doi: 10.1086/312840

    2000 doi

  46. [55]

    J., Eisenhauer, F., et al

    Genzel, R., Tacconi, L. J., Eisenhauer, F., et al. 2006, Nature, 442, 786, doi: 10.1038/nature05052

    2006 doi

  47. [56]

    2011, ApJ, 733, 101, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/733/2/101

    Genzel, R., Newman, S., Jones, T., et al. 2011, ApJ, 733, 101, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/733/2/101

    2011 doi

  48. [57]

    M.,¨Ubler, H., et al

    Genzel, R., F¨ orster Schreiber, N. M.,¨Ubler, H., et al. 2017, Nature, 543, 397, doi: 10.1038/nature21685

    2017 doi

  49. [58]

    H., ¨Ubler, H., et al

    Genzel, R., Price, S. H., ¨Ubler, H., et al. 2020, ApJ, 902, 98, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abb0ea

    2020 doi

  50. [59]

    I., & Stadel, J

    Goerdt, T., Moore, B., Read, J. I., & Stadel, J. 2010, ApJ, 725, 1707, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/725/2/1707

    2010 doi

  51. [60]

    G., & Behroozi, P

    Guo, H., Wang, J., Jones, M. G., & Behroozi, P. 2023, ApJ, 955, 57, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aced47

    2023 doi

  52. [61]

    2023, ApJ, 959, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad029e

    Harikane, Y., Zhang, Y., Nakajima, K., et al. 2023, ApJ, 959, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad029e

    2023 doi

  53. [62]

    Swinbank, A. M. 2014, MNRAS, 441, 3306, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu515

    2014 doi

  54. [63]

    M., Costa, T., Tadhunter, C

    Harrison, C. M., Costa, T., Tadhunter, C. N., et al. 2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 198, doi: 10.1038/s41550-018-0403-6

    2018 doi

  55. [64]

    M., & Best, P

    Heckman, T. M., & Best, P. N. 2014, ARA&A, 52, 589, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-035722

    2014 doi

  56. [65]

    M., Price, S

    Herrera-Camus, R., F¨ orster Schreiber, N. M., Price, S. H., et al. 2022, A&A, 665, L8, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142562

    2022 doi

  57. [66]

    Ho, L. C. 2007, ApJ, 669, 821, doi: 10.1086/521917

    2007 doi

  58. [67]

    A., Carilli, C

    Hodge, J. A., Carilli, C. L., Walter, F., et al. 2012, ApJ, 760, 11, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/760/1/11

    2012 doi

  59. [68]

    2020, ARA&A, 58, 27, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-120419-014455

    Inayoshi, K., Visbal, E., & Haiman, Z. 2020, ARA&A, 58, 27, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-120419-014455

    2020 doi

  60. [69]

    2017, MNRAS, 466, 4159, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3285

    Iorio, G., Fraternali, F., Nipoti, C., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 4159, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3285

    2017 doi

  61. [70]

    2019, PASJ, 71, 111, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psz096 —

    Izumi, T., Onoue, M., Matsuoka, Y., et al. 2019, PASJ, 71, 111, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psz096 —. 2021, ApJ, 908, 235, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abd7ef

    2019 doi

  62. [71]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.02468, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2405.02468

    Izumi, T., Matsuoka, Y., Onoue, M., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.02468, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2405.02468

    2024 doi arXiv

  63. [72]

    C., Vergani, D., Romano, M., et al

    Jones, G. C., Vergani, D., Romano, M., et al. 2021, MNRAS, 507, 3540, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2226

    2021 doi

  64. [73]

    Jorsater, S., & van Moorsel, G. A. 1995, AJ, 110, 2037, doi: 10.1086/117668 J´ ozsa, G. I. G., Kenn, F., Klein, U., & Oosterloo, T. A. 2007, A&A, 468, 731, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20066164

    1995 doi

  65. [74]

    J., Matthee, J., et al

    Kashino, D., Lilly, S. J., Matthee, J., et al. 2023, ApJ, 950, 66, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acc588

    2023 doi

  66. [75]

    Kauffmann, G., White, S. D. M., & Guiderdoni, B. 1993, MNRAS, 264, 201, doi: 10.1093/mnras/264.1.201 Kereˇ s, D., Katz, N., Weinberg, D. H., & Dav´ e, R. 2005, MNRAS, 363, 2, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09451.x 30 Fei et al

    1993

  67. [76]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.09755, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.09755

    Khatri, P., Romano-D ´ ıaz, E., & Porciani, C. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.09755, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.09755

    2024 doi arXiv

  68. [77]

    S., Sorini, D., Lee, K.-G., & Dav´ e, R

    Khrykin, I. S., Sorini, D., Lee, K.-G., & Dav´ e, R. 2024, MNRAS, 529, 537, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae525

    2024 doi

  69. [78]

    B., Cornell, M

    Kormendy, J., Fisher, D. B., Cornell, M. E., & Bender, R. 2009, ApJS, 182, 216, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/182/1/216

    2009 doi

  70. [79]

    Kormendy, J., & Ho, L. C. 2013, ARA&A, 51, 511, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082708-101811

    2013 doi

  71. [80]

    M., Genzel, R., et al

    Lang, P., F¨ orster Schreiber, N. M., Genzel, R., et al. 2017, ApJ, 840, 92, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa6d82

    2017 doi

  72. [81]

    E., Rosolowsky, E., et al

    Lang, P., Meidt, S. E., Rosolowsky, E., et al. 2020, ApJ, 897, 122, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab9953

    2020 doi

  73. [82]

    L., F¨ orster Schreiber, N

    Lee, L. L., F¨ orster Schreiber, N. M., Price, S. H., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.07312, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.07312

    2024 doi arXiv

  74. [83]

    M., Fraternali, F., et al

    Lelli, F., Di Teodoro, E. M., Fraternali, F., et al. 2021, Science, 371, 713, doi: 10.1126/science.abc1893

    2021 doi

  75. [84]

    G., et al

    Lelli, F., Zhang, Z.-Y., Bisbas, T. G., et al. 2023, A&A, 672, A106, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245105

    2023 doi

  76. [85]

    C., Bolatto, A

    Levy, R. C., Bolatto, A. D., Teuben, P., et al. 2018, ApJ, 860, 92, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aac2e5

    2018 doi

  77. [86]

    D., Shen, Y., et al

    Li, J., Silverman, J. D., Shen, Y., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.00074, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2403.00074

    2024 doi arXiv

  78. [87]

    2007, ApJ, 665, 187, doi: 10.1086/519297

    Li, Y., Hernquist, L., Robertson, B., et al. 2007, ApJ, 665, 187, doi: 10.1086/519297

    2007 doi

  79. [88]

    I., Burtscher, L., et al

    Lin, M.-Y., Davies, R. I., Burtscher, L., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 458, 1375, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw401

    2016 doi

  80. [89]

    D., Daddi, E., et al

    Liu, Z., Silverman, J. D., Daddi, E., et al. 2024, ApJ, 968, 15, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad4096

    2024 doi

  81. [90]

    2019, MNRAS, 489, 681, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2170

    Loiacono, F., Talia, M., Fraternali, F., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 489, 681, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2170

    2019 doi

  82. [91]

    2024, A&A, 685, A121, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348535

    Loiacono, F., Decarli, R., Mignoli, M., et al. 2024, A&A, 685, A121, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202348535

    2024 doi

  83. [92]

    C., Cormier, D., Hony, S., et al

    Madden, S. C., Cormier, D., Hony, S., et al. 2020, A&A, 643, A141, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202038860

    2020 doi

  84. [93]

    1998, AJ, 115, 2285, doi: 10.1086/300353

    Magorrian, J., Tremaine, S., Richstone, D., et al. 1998, AJ, 115, 2285, doi: 10.1086/300353

    1998 doi

  85. [94]

    2012, MNRAS, 425, L66, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2012.01303.x

    Maiolino, R., Gallerani, S., Neri, R., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 425, L66, doi: 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2012.01303.x

    2012

  86. [95]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2308.01230, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2308.01230 Mancera Pi˜ na, P

    Maiolino, R., Scholtz, J., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2308.01230, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2308.01230 Mancera Pi˜ na, P. E., Fraternali, F., Adams, E. A. K., et al. 2019, ApJL, 883, L33, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab40c7

    2023 doi arXiv

  87. [96]

    2013, MNRAS, 432, 1947, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt297

    Martizzi, D., Teyssier, R., & Moore, B. 2013, MNRAS, 432, 1947, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt297

    2013 doi

  88. [97]

    A., Kashikawa, N., et al

    Matsuoka, Y., Strauss, M. A., Kashikawa, N., et al. 2018, ApJ, 869, 150, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaee7a

    2018 doi

  89. [98]

    2019, ApJ, 883, 183, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3c60

    Matsuoka, Y., Iwasawa, K., Onoue, M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 883, 183, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab3c60

    2019 doi

  90. [99]

    2007, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol

    Golap, K. 2007, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 376, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XVI, ed. R. A. Shaw, F. Hill, & D. J. Bell, 127

    2007

  91. [100]

    A., Neeleman, M., Walter, F., & Venemans, B

    Meyer, R. A., Neeleman, M., Walter, F., & Venemans, B. 2023, ApJ, 956, 127, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acf047

    2023 doi

  92. [101]

    C., & Hernquist, L

    Mihos, J. C., & Hernquist, L. 1996, ApJ, 464, 641, doi: 10.1086/177353

    1996 doi

  93. [102]

    2024, ApJ, 963, 9, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1404 M¨ uller-S´ anchez, F., Prieto, M

    Morishita, T., Stiavelli, M., Chary, R.-R., et al. 2024, ApJ, 963, 9, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1404 M¨ uller-S´ anchez, F., Prieto, M. A., Mezcua, M., et al. 2013, ApJL, 763, L1, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/763/1/L1

    2024 doi

  94. [103]

    G., Diemer, B., Chen, Z., et al

    Murray, S. G., Diemer, B., Chen, Z., et al. 2021, Astronomy and Computing, 36, 100487, doi: 10.1016/j.ascom.2021.100487

    2021

  95. [104]

    G., Power, C., & Robotham, A

    Murray, S. G., Power, C., & Robotham, A. S. G. 2013, Astronomy and Computing, 3, 23, doi: 10.1016/j.ascom.2013.11.001

    2013 doi

  96. [105]

    2023, ApJ, 958, 132, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad05d2

    Neeleman, M., Walter, F., Decarli, R., et al. 2023, ApJ, 958, 132, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad05d2

    2023 doi

  97. [106]

    P., et al

    Neeleman, M., Novak, M., Venemans, B. P., et al. 2021, ApJ, 911, 141, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abe70f Nestor Shachar, A., Price, S. H., F¨ orster Schreiber, N. M., et al. 2023, ApJ, 944, 78, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca9cf

    2021 doi

  98. [107]

    F., Genzel, R., F¨ orster Schreiber, N

    Newman, S. F., Genzel, R., F¨ orster Schreiber, N. M., et al. 2013, ApJ, 767, 104, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/767/2/104

    2013 doi

  99. [108]

    P., Walter, F., et al

    Novak, M., Venemans, B. P., Walter, F., et al. 2020, ApJ, 904, 131, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc33f

    2020 doi

  100. [109]

    2019, ApJ, 880, 77, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab29e9

    Onoue, M., Kashikawa, N., Matsuoka, Y., et al. 2019, ApJ, 880, 77, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab29e9

    2019 doi

  101. [110]

    D., et al

    Onoue, M., Ding, X., Silverman, J. D., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.07113, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2409.07113

    2024 doi arXiv

  102. [111]

    2023, ApJL, 957, L3, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0158

    Pacucci, F., Nguyen, B., Carniani, S., Maiolino, R., & Fan, X. 2023, ApJL, 957, L3, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0158

    2023 doi

  103. [112]

    2023, A&A, 673, A153, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245603

    Parlanti, E., Carniani, S., Pallottini, A., et al. 2023, A&A, 673, A153, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245603

    2023 doi

  104. [113]

    2022, A&A, 662, A94, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142659

    Perna, M., Arribas, S., Colina, L., et al. 2022, A&A, 662, A94, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142659

    2022 doi

  105. [114]

    1996, MNRAS, 281, 27, doi: 10.1093/mnras/278.1.27

    Persic, M., Salucci, P., & Stel, F. 1996, MNRAS, 281, 27, doi: 10.1093/mnras/278.1.27

    1996 doi

  106. [115]

    E., Steidel, C

    Pettini, M., Shapley, A. E., Steidel, C. C., et al. 2001, ApJ, 554, 981, doi: 10.1086/321403 Planck Collaboration, Ade, P. A. R., Aghanim, N., et al. 2016, A&A, 594, A13, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201525830

    2001 doi

  107. [116]

    2023, ApJL, 951, L46, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acdf5a Rotation curves of twoz ∼ 6 quasars 31

    Pope, A., McKinney, J., Kamieneski, P., et al. 2023, ApJL, 951, L46, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acdf5a Rotation curves of twoz ∼ 6 quasars 31

    2023 doi

  108. [117]

    C., Aravena, M., Gonz´ alez-L´ opez, J., et al

    Posses, A. C., Aravena, M., Gonz´ alez-L´ opez, J., et al. 2023, A&A, 669, A46, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243399

    2023 doi

  109. [118]

    H., Shimizu, T

    Price, S. H., Shimizu, T. T., Genzel, R., et al. 2021, ApJ, 922, 143, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac22ad

    2021 doi

  110. [119]

    2023, MNRAS, 524, 2814, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1966

    Puglisi, A., Dudzeviˇ ci¯ ut˙ e, U., Swinbank, M., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 524, 2814, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1966

    2023 doi

  111. [120]

    J., & Faucher-Gigu` ere, C.-A

    Richings, A. J., & Faucher-Gigu` ere, C.-A. 2018, MNRAS, 474, 3673, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx3014

    2018 doi

  112. [121]

    2021, MNRAS, 507, 3952, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2295

    Powell, D. 2021, MNRAS, 507, 3952, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab2295

    2021 doi

  113. [122]

    2020, Nature, 584, 201, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2572-6

    Rizzo, F., Vegetti, S., Powell, D., et al. 2020, Nature, 584, 201, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2572-6

    2020 doi

  114. [123]

    2023, A&A, 679, A129, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346444

    Rizzo, F., Roman-Oliveira, F., Fraternali, F., et al. 2023, A&A, 679, A129, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346444

    2023 doi

  115. [124]

    H., Lockhart, I

    Rogstad, D. H., Lockhart, I. A., & Wright, M. C. H. 1974, ApJ, 193, 309, doi: 10.1086/153164

    1974 doi

  116. [125]

    L., et al

    Rojas-Ruiz, S., Mazzucchelli, C., Finkelstein, S. L., et al. 2024, ApJ, 967, 27, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3bab

    2024 doi

  117. [126]

    2023, MNRAS, 521, 1045, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad530

    Roman-Oliveira, F., Fraternali, F., & Rizzo, F. 2023, MNRAS, 521, 1045, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad530

    2023 doi

  118. [127]

    E., Hodge, J., Bouwens, R., et al

    Rowland, L. E., Hodge, J., Bouwens, R., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.06025, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2405.06025

    2024 doi arXiv

  119. [128]

    C., Ford, W

    Rubin, V. C., Ford, W. K., J., & Thonnard, N. 1978, ApJL, 225, L107, doi: 10.1086/182804 —. 1980, ApJ, 238, 471, doi: 10.1086/158003

    1978 doi

  120. [129]

    I., Sternberg, A., et al

    Sani, E., Davies, R. I., Sternberg, A., et al. 2012, MNRAS, 424, 1963, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21333.x

    2012

  121. [130]

    2023, MNRAS, 526, 4978, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2419

    Schaye, J., Kugel, R., Schaller, M., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 526, 4978, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2419

    2023 doi

  122. [131]

    Schramm, M., & Silverman, J. D. 2013, ApJ, 767, 13, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/767/1/13

    2013 doi

  123. [132]

    C., et al

    Shao, Y., Wang, R., Jones, G. C., et al. 2017, ApJ, 845, 138, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa826c

    2017 doi

  124. [133]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2309.04541, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2309.04541

    Sharma, G., Freundlich, J., van de Ven, G., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2309.04541, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2309.04541

    2023 doi arXiv

  125. [134]

    2021, MNRAS, 503, 1753, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab249

    Lapi, A. 2021, MNRAS, 503, 1753, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab249

    2021 doi

  126. [135]

    2022, A&A, 659, A40, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141822

    Sharma, G., Salucci, P., & van de Ven, G. 2022, A&A, 659, A40, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141822

    2022 doi

  127. [136]

    A., Oguri, M., et al

    Shen, Y., Strauss, M. A., Oguri, M., et al. 2007, AJ, 133, 2222, doi: 10.1086/513517

    2007 doi

  128. [137]

    2015, ApJS, 219, 15, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/219/2/15

    Shibuya, T., Ouchi, M., & Harikane, Y. 2015, ApJS, 219, 15, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/219/2/15

    2015 doi

  129. [138]

    2019, ApJL, 872, L29, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab053f

    Shimasaku, K., & Izumi, T. 2019, ApJL, 872, L29, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab053f

    2019 doi

  130. [139]

    Silk, J., & Rees, M. J. 1998, A&A, 331, L1, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.astro-ph/9801013

    1998 doi arXiv

  131. [140]

    D., Van Duyne, J., Urry, C

    Simmons, B. D., Van Duyne, J., Urry, C. M., et al. 2011, ApJ, 734, 121, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/734/2/121

    2011 doi

  132. [141]

    2001, ARA&A, 39, 137, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.39.1.137

    Sofue, Y., & Rubin, V. 2001, ARA&A, 39, 137, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.39.1.137

    2001 doi

  133. [142]

    Springel, V., White, S. D. M., Jenkins, A., et al. 2005, Nature, 435, 629, doi: 10.1038/nature03597

    2005 doi

  134. [143]

    J., Labb´ e, I., et al

    Stefanon, M., Bouwens, R. J., Labb´ e, I., et al. 2021, ApJ, 922, 29, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1bb6

    2021 doi

  135. [144]

    A., Lyu, J., Rieke, G

    Stone, M. A., Lyu, J., Rieke, G. H., Alberts, S., & Hainline, K. N. 2024, ApJ, 964, 90, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2a57

    2024 doi

  136. [145]

    J., Genzel, R., & Sternberg, A

    Tacconi, L. J., Genzel, R., & Sternberg, A. 2020, ARA&A, 58, 157, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-141034

    2020 doi

  137. [146]

    S., et al

    Tadaki, K., Iono, D., Yun, M. S., et al. 2018, Nature, 560, 613, doi: 10.1038/s41586-018-0443-1

    2018 doi

  138. [147]

    2017, ApJ, 834, 135, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/135

    Tadaki, K.-i., Genzel, R., Kodama, T., et al. 2017, ApJ, 834, 135, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/834/2/135

    2017 doi

  139. [148]

    2019, ApJ, 887, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab50be

    Tan, Q.-H., Gao, Y., Kohno, K., et al. 2019, ApJ, 887, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab50be

    2019 doi

  140. [149]

    S., Silverman, J

    Tanaka, T. S., Silverman, J. D., Ding, X., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2401.13742, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2401.13742

    2024 doi arXiv

  141. [150]

    L., Swinbank, A

    Tiley, A. L., Swinbank, A. M., Harrison, C. M., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 485, 934, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz428

    2019 doi

  142. [151]

    D., Ross, N

    Timlin, J. D., Ross, N. P., Richards, G. T., et al. 2018, ApJ, 859, 20, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aab9ac

    2018 doi

  143. [152]

    1964, ApJ, 139, 1217, doi: 10.1086/147861

    Toomre, A. 1964, ApJ, 139, 1217, doi: 10.1086/147861

    1964 doi

  144. [153]

    2024a, A&A, 682, A54, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347081 —

    Tripodi, R., Scholtz, J., Maiolino, R., et al. 2024a, A&A, 682, A54, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347081 —. 2024b, A&A, 682, A54, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347081

    doi

  145. [154]

    2023, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 9, 018001, doi: 10.1117/1.JATIS.9.1.018001

    Tsukui, T., Iguchi, S., Mitsuhashi, I., & Tadaki, K. 2023, Journal of Astronomical Telescopes, Instruments, and Systems, 9, 018001, doi: 10.1117/1.JATIS.9.1.018001

    2023 doi

  146. [155]

    J., Cirasuolo, M., Harrison, C

    Turner, O. J., Cirasuolo, M., Harrison, C. M., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 471, 1280, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx1366 ¨Ubler, H., Genzel, R., Tacconi, L. J., et al. 2018, ApJL, 854, L24, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/aaacfa ¨Ubler, H., Genzel, R., Wisnioski, E., et al. 2019, ApJ, 880, 48, doi: 10...

    2017 doi

  147. [156]

    P., Neeleman, M., Walter, F., et al

    Venemans, B. P., Neeleman, M., Walter, F., et al. 2019, ApJL, 874, L30, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab11cc 32 Fei et al

    2019 doi

  148. [157]

    P., Walter, F., Neeleman, M., et al

    Venemans, B. P., Walter, F., Neeleman, M., et al. 2020, ApJ, 904, 130, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abc563

    2020 doi

  149. [158]

    E., Greve, T

    Vizgan, D., Heintz, K. E., Greve, T. R., et al. 2022, ApJL, 939, L1, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac982c

    2022 doi

  150. [159]

    Walter, F., Brinks, E., de Blok, W. J. G., et al. 2008, AJ, 136, 2563, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/136/6/2563

    2008 doi

  151. [160]

    2022, ApJ, 927, 21, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac49e8

    Walter, F., Neeleman, M., Decarli, R., et al. 2022, ApJ, 927, 21, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac49e8

    2022 doi

  152. [161]

    2021, ApJL, 907, L1, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abd8c6

    Wang, F., Yang, J., Fan, X., et al. 2021, ApJL, 907, L1, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abd8c6

    2021 doi

  153. [162]

    F., et al

    Wang, F., Yang, J., Hennawi, J. F., et al. 2023, ApJL, 951, L4, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/accd6f

    2023 doi

  154. [163]

    M., Wuyts, S., et al

    Wisnioski, E., F¨ orster Schreiber, N. M., Wuyts, S., et al. 2015, ApJ, 799, 209, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/799/2/209

    2015 doi

  155. [164]

    2024, ApJS, 271, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ad20c9

    Wong, T., Cao, Y., Luo, Y., et al. 2024, ApJS, 271, 35, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ad20c9

    2024 doi

  156. [165]

    M., Wisnioski, E., et al

    Wuyts, S., F¨ orster Schreiber, N. M., Wisnioski, E., et al. 2016, ApJ, 831, 149, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/831/2/149

    2016 doi

  157. [166]

    2020, ApJL, 897, L14, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab9c26

    Yang, J., Wang, F., Fan, X., et al. 2020, ApJL, 897, L14, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab9c26

    2020 doi

  158. [167]

    2022, ApJL, 938, L17, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac8803

    Yang, L., Morishita, T., Leethochawalit, N., et al. 2022, ApJL, 938, L17, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac8803

    2022 doi

  159. [168]

    A., et al

    Yue, M., Eilers, A.-C., Simcoe, R. A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 966, 176, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad3914

    2024 doi

  160. [169]

    2018, MNRAS, 481, 1976, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2394

    Zanella, A., Daddi, E., Magdis, G., et al. 2018, MNRAS, 481, 1976, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2394

    2018 doi

  161. [170]

    2023a, MNRAS, 523, L69, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slad060 —

    Zhang, H., Behroozi, P., Volonteri, M., et al. 2023a, MNRAS, 523, L69, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slad060 —. 2023b, MNRAS, 518, 2123, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2633

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.