Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 8 minor 96 references

Blazars Jets and prospects for TeV-PeV neutrinos & gamma-rays through cosmic-ray interactions

T0 review · 3 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read W Comae and 1ES 1959+650 show TeV gamma-ray excesses that electron-only emission cannot explain, pointing to proton interactions and making all four BL Lacs promising neutrino and cosmic-ray sources.

desk verdict Solid CTAO forecast, but the hadronic claim rests on upper-limit proton luminosity and no fit statistics; worth a serious referee. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.09108 v1 pith:PB74SRKG submitted 2025-01-15 astro-ph.HE

Rodrigo Sasse , Rubens Jr. Costa , Luiz A. Stuani Pereira , Rita C. dos Anjos This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords blazarscosmicraysgammaneutrinoslepto-hadronicmodelBLLacertaeobjectsCTAOmultimessengerastronomy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that four BL Lacertae blazars — W Comae, 1ES 1959+650, PKS 2005-489, and PKS 2155-304 — can account for their multiwavelength emission only if their jets contain both electrons and protons in a single compact blob. For W Comae and 1ES 1959+650, the electron-only component under-predicts the observed TeV gamma-ray flux, so the fit needs pion production from proton-photon and proton-proton collisions; the other two sources are mostly leptonic but show hints of hadronic emission at the highest energies. If correct, these blazar jets accelerate protons to very high energies and could be sources of cosmic rays and of neutrinos peaking near $10^{14}$–$10^{16}$ eV. The paper then shows that the Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory should detect all four sources in 50 hours, which would put this hadronic picture to a direct test.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing machinery is the one-zone lepto-hadronic radiation model, in which all radiation comes from a single spherical emission region containing power-law populations of electrons and protons. The calculation solves time-dependent coupled kinetic equations for electrons, positrons, protons, neutrons, photons, neutrinos, pions, and muons, combining primary electron synchrotron and synchrotron self-Compton emission with proton synchrotron and inverse-Compton emission, photon-pair production, and neutral-pion decay from both proton-photon and proton-proton interactions; the proton-proton channel is added on top of the earlier framework. On the observability side, the CTAO projection uses a simultaneous likelihood fit over multi-GeV-to-TeV catalog data, an extragalactic-background-light absorption model, and a 1D ON/OFF analysis with 50-hour instrument response functions for the North and South arrays at several zenith angles.

What would settle it

A 50-hour CTAO observation of W Comae or 1ES 1959+650 that finds the TeV spectrum matches the electron-only prediction with no excess around $10^{12}$–$10^{14}$ eV, or a stacked neutrino-telescope search over these four directions that sees no events at the modeled all-flavor fluxes near $10^{14}$–$10^{16}$ eV, would falsify the central claim.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a single-zone lepto-hadronic model — a spherical blob with radius $R \sim 10^{16.7}$–$10^{17.3}$ cm, magnetic field $B \sim 0.7$–$1.4$ G, bulk Lorentz factor $\Gamma \sim 4$–$12$, and equal power-law indices for electrons and protons — reproduces the gamma-ray-to-radio spectral energy distributions of all four BL Lacs. For W Comae and 1ES 1959+650, the high-energy tail around $10^{10}$–$10^{14}$ eV cannot be matched by electron synchrotron and inverse Compton emission alone; the fit requires hadronic channels, chiefly neutral-pion decay from proton-photon ($p\gamma \to \pi^0 \to \gamma\gamma$) and proton-proton ($pp \to \pi^0 \to \gamma\gamma$) interactions. The corresponding all-flavor neutrino fluxes peak near $10^{14}$–$10^{16}$ eV, with maximum values around $10^{-14.4}$ to $10^{-11.3}$ erg cm$^{-2}$ s$^{-1}$ for the four sources. The paper concludes that these objects could be effective cosmic-ray emitters and that CTAO observations will be able to test this interpretation.

Load-bearing premise

The hadronic gamma-ray and neutrino fluxes are set by the maximum proton luminosity, which the paper adopts as an upper-limit parameter from the earlier model rather than as a measured quantity; if the true proton luminosity is lower, or if the TeV emission comes from a separate flare zone, the claimed need for hadronic processes disappears.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • W Comae and 1ES 1959+650 would have a substantial hadronic component in their TeV emission, making them the two most promising neutrino targets among the four.
  • CTAO should detect all four blazars in 50-hour exposures, with 1ES 1959+650's modeled spectrum extending to about 30 TeV.
  • The predicted all-flavor neutrino fluxes near $10^{14}$–$10^{16}$ eV give neutrino telescopes a concrete flux level to test with point-source or stacked searches.
  • A positive detection at multi-TeV energies would strengthen the case that BL Lac jets accelerate nuclei and contribute to the cosmic-ray flux, rather than emitting only leptonic radiation.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension is to compare the predicted neutrino fluxes directly with stacked neutrino-telescope limits: a non-detection at the modeled fluxes would force the proton luminosity down and weaken the hadronic interpretation.
  • The TeV excess in W Comae and 1ES 1959+650 could also be explained if those data points come from a separate flare zone with different physical conditions; a time-resolved, multi-zone fit would settle whether the single blob is truly hadronic.
  • The same fitting procedure could be applied to other gamma-ray-selected blazars, prioritizing objects whose existing TeV data already lie above the electron-only envelope; those would be the best candidates for the next generation of gamma-ray and neutrino instruments.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 8 minor

Summary. The paper applies the open-source AM3 lepto-hadronic one-zone code to four BL Lacs (W Comae, 1ES 1959+650, PKS 2005-489, PKS 2155-304), adopting model parameters from Rodrigues et al. (2024), extending the framework to include pp interactions, and simulating CTAO detectability with Gammapy and prod5 instrument response functions. The authors conclude in Section 4 that a purely leptonic model is insufficient for W Comae and 1ES 1959+650, that hadronic processes contribute substantially at high energies, and that all four sources could be effective cosmic-ray emitters detectable by CTAO in 50-hour exposures.

Significance. The CTAO visibility and sensitivity analysis in Section 3 is concrete and reproducible: it uses public IRFs, Gammapy, specific array configurations, and reports AIC-based model selection with fit parameters in Tables 6 and 7. The choice to use the open-source AM3 code and to state model parameters explicitly is a strength. However, the paper's central astrophysical claim, that hadronic emission is required for W Comae and 1ES 1959+650, is not established by the analysis as presented. The hadronic component is normalized to the maximum proton luminosity allowed by the prior constraint, and the comparison with TeV data is visual only. If reframed as an upper-limit study, the model predictions and CTAO forecasts would be a useful contribution, but the current wording overreaches the evidence.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 2, Table 1] The hadronic normalization is taken at the upper limit, not determined by a fit. Table 1 lists log10 Lmax_p with '<' symbols for all four sources, and Section 2 states only the constraint Lp/Le < 10^3. The hadronic gamma-ray and neutrino fluxes in Figs. 1–4 therefore scale linearly with a parameter that is set to its maximum allowed value, so these curves are upper limits, not measured or fitted components. Section 4's conclusion that a purely leptonic model is insufficient for W Comae and 1ES 1959+650 depends entirely on this maximal normalization. The authors should either fit Lp as a free parameter and report uncertainties, or explicitly relabel all hadronic curves and neutrino fluxes as upper limits and soften the conclusion accordingly.
  2. [Section 2, Figs. 1–2] The evidence against the purely leptonic model is a visual comparison. No goodness-of-fit statistic (chi-square, likelihood, or AIC) is computed for the SED fits in Section 2; AIC appears only in Section 3.1 for the CTAO source-model selection. Visual insufficiency is especially fragile here because the leptonic parameters (electron luminosity, B, R, Gamma) are inherited from Rodrigues et al. (2024) rather than refit in this work, and a different leptonic parameter set (for example a higher electron luminosity or a different magnetic field) might describe the VERITAS and HESS points without hadronic contributions. The claim that hadronic interactions 'significantly improve the fit' requires a quantitative model comparison.
  3. [Section 3.2, Figs. 6, 8, 10, 12] The CTAO detectability forecasts are based on the log-parabola spectrum fitted to Fermi and VTSCat data in Section 3.1 (Table 7), not on the lepto-hadronic SED from Section 2. Consequently, the statement in Section 4 that CTAO observations will test these sources as cosmic-ray emitters is not directly connected to the hadronic model: the simulated detection would occur even for a purely leptonic source with the same observed spectrum. The authors should clarify which model is being simulated and state explicitly what a CTAO detection or non-detection would imply for the proton luminosity and the hadronic scenario.
minor comments (8)
  1. [Section 3.1, Table 6] The definition of deltaAICm in the table caption uses BICm (1 - BICm/AICPL) while the text and header refer to AIC; please correct the notation and also align the label 'BPL' with Equation (4), which is called the exponential cutoff power law (ECPL).
  2. [Section 3.2, Table 11 caption] The phrase 'the ashes indicating the source is not visible' should be 'the dashes indicating the source is not visible'.
  3. [Figure 8 caption] The caption references 'see Table 5' for the 1ES 1959+650 counterparts, but the correct table is Table 3.
  4. [Section 3.2, 1ES 1959+650 paragraph] The sentence 'Figure 7 illustrates the energy spectra for the W Comae region' should refer to the 1ES 1959+650 region.
  5. [Figure 1 caption] The caption contains a duplicated sentence: 'The black curve represents the total cumulative SED... The black curve depicts the total cumulative SED...' Please remove the duplicate.
  6. [Section 2, AM3 description] The text refers to 'AM31 software' but the cited reference [67] and the project name are 'AM3'; please fix this typo.
  7. [Declarations] Several declaration items ('Ethics approval and consent to participate', 'Consent for publication', 'Materials availability') are present but empty; please either complete them or remove the placeholders.
  8. [Title and abstract] The title 'Blazars Jets' should be 'Blazar Jets' for grammatical correctness.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the hadronic and CTAO claims are conditional model outputs, not inputs renamed as predictions; the only self-citation is a methodological reference.

full rationale

The paper's Section 2 adopts the lepto-hadronic model parameters, including maximum proton luminosities, from Rodrigues et al. (2024) and computes AM3 SEDs and neutrino fluxes. This is a transparent parameter application rather than a circular derivation: the model output is not used to define the input, and the paper does not claim to measure Lp. The conclusion that a purely leptonic model is insufficient for W Comae and 1ES 1959+650 is a visual comparison between the leptonic component of the adopted model and VERITAS/MAGIC data; it is model-dependent and underdetermined (no chi-square or likelihood is reported for the hadronic fits), but that is a correctness/robustness limitation, not a circularity. The CTAO detectability analysis in Section 3 is independent of the hadronic model: source spectra are fitted to Fermi and VERITAS catalog data and then folded with CTAO IRFs, so those projections are not forced by the proton luminosity input. The tabulated maximum neutrino fluxes are inherited upper limits from Rodrigues et al. (2024), not newly fitted predictions. The one self-citation (Ref. [74], by Costa, dos Anjos, Pereira et al.) is used only to borrow the likelihood and ON/OFF analysis methodology; it does not supply the physical conclusion and is not load-bearing for the central claim. No equation in the paper reduces to its own input, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. Accordingly, no significant circularity is identified; the paper's main results remain conditional on externally adopted model parameters.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 7 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a set of inherited model parameters (R, B, Gamma, Le, Lp) from Rodrigues et al. (2024) and on the single-zone approximation. The hadronic component, and hence the neutrino prediction, is directly proportional to Lp, which is not independently constrained except as an upper limit. No new particles, fields, forces, or other entities are introduced; the blob is a standard model element, not an invented entity.

free parameters (6)
  • Blob radius R = log10 R = 16.7 to 17.3 cm
    Set from Rodrigues et al. (2024); controls photon densities and opacities; not measured in this paper.
  • Magnetic field B = log10 B = 0.7 to 1.4 G
    Set from Rodrigues et al. (2024); controls synchrotron emission and proton energy losses.
  • Bulk Lorentz factor Gamma = 4.0 to 12.0
    Set from Rodrigues et al. (2024); boosts observed luminosities and the Doppler factor.
  • Electron luminosity Le = log10 Le = 41.4 to 46.2 erg/s
    Determines the leptonic SED; taken from a prior model fit to the same multiwavelength data.
  • Proton luminosity Lp = log10 Lp < 44.1 to < 47.2 erg/s (upper limits)
    Sets the hadronic gamma-ray and neutrino fluxes; only an upper-limit constraint (Lp/Le < 1e3) is given, so the displayed hadronic component is conditional on this value.
  • Spectral index alpha_p = alpha_e = 1.0
    Chosen by hand for all four sources; shapes the broadband SED.
assumptions (7)
  • domain assumption Single-zone emission region: all radiation and neutrino production occur in one spherical blob of radius R with uniform B and particle populations.
    Invoked in Section 2; standard for this class of models but neglects jet structure and multiple zones.
  • domain assumption The blob is observed at an angle 1/Gamma, so the Doppler factor delta_D is approximately Gamma.
    Section 2; simplifies relativistic beaming but may not hold if the jet has structure.
  • domain assumption Injected particle distributions are power laws, dN/dgamma proportional to gamma^-alpha.
    Section 2; the choice alpha = 1 and the injection energy range are not derived.
  • domain assumption AM3 and QGSJET-III accurately compute the p-gamma and pp interaction yields.
    Section 2; the model results inherit the cross-section and Monte Carlo uncertainties of these codes.
  • domain assumption The EBL absorption model of Saldana-Lopez et al. (2021) is correct.
    Section 3.1, Equation (1); the intrinsic spectra depend on this model.
  • domain assumption Catalog fluxes used for the CTAO source fits (Fermi, VERITAS, HESS) are reliable and co-spatial.
    Section 3.1; angular separations are small (at most 0.015 deg) but systematic cross-calibration is not addressed.
  • ad hoc to paper The proton luminosity Lp is at the maximum value allowed by the constraint from Rodrigues et al. (2024).
    Section 2 and Table 1; the paper presents Lp as an upper limit, and the visible hadronic component depends on assuming that upper limit is realized. The paper does not independently justify this value.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Blazars Jets and prospects for TeV-PeV neutrinos & gamma-rays through cosmic-ray interactions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PB74SRKG

@misc{pith2026250109108,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Blazars Jets and prospects for TeV-PeV neutrinos & gamma-rays through cosmic-ray interactions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PB74SRKG}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.09108}
}
read the original abstract

This study explores the origins of cosmic rays and their secondary messengers, focusing on the potential role of four BL Lacs W Comae, 1ES 1959+650, PKS 2005-489, and PKS 2155-304 as potential sources of astrophysical neutrinos and gamma rays. We analyzed a single-zone model to understand the interactions between high-energy protons and ambient photons within blazar jets, leading to neutrino production observables and gamma-ray emission. This modeling contextualizes the emissions within multiwavelength observations and evaluates the capabilities of the next-generation Cherenkov Telescope Array Observatory (CTAO) in detecting these emissions. Our estimations suggest that these sources could be effective emitters of CRs, highlighting the need for future multimessenger observations to further investigate and constrain this class of sources.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

96 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    An Indication of Anisotropy in Arrival Directions of Ultra-high-energy Cosmic Rays through Comparison to the Flux Pattern of Extragalactic Gamma-Ray Sources

    Aab A, Abreu P, Aglietta M, Albuquerque IFM, Allekotte I, Almela A, et al. An Indication of Anisotropy in Arrival Directions of Ultra-high-energy Cosmic Rays through Comparison to the Flux Pattern of Extragalactic Gamma-Ray Sources. ApJ. 2018 Feb;853(2):L29. https://doi.org/10.3847/2041-8213/aaa66d. arXiv:1801.06160. [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2018

  2. [2]

    On the Origin of the Cosmic Radiation

    Fermi E. On the Origin of the Cosmic Radiation. Phys Rev. 1949 Apr;75:1169–

    1949

  3. [3]

    Binary coalescences as sources of Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Rays

    Pereira JP, Coimbra-Ara´ ujo CH, dos Anjos RC, Coelho JG. Binary Coa- lescences as Sources of Ultrahigh-Energy Cosmic Rays. Phys. Rev. Lett.. 2024 Feb;132(9):091401. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.132.091401. arXiv:2307.06200. [astro-ph.HE]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    Blazars as Ultra-high-energy Cosmic-ray Sources: Implications for TeV Gamma-Ray Observations

    Murase K, Dermer CD, Takami H, Migliori G. Blazars as Ultra-high-energy Cosmic-ray Sources: Implications for TeV Gamma-Ray Observations. ApJ. 2012 Apr;749(1):63. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/749/1/63. arXiv:1107.5576. [astro-ph.HE]

    arXiv 2012

  5. [6]

    The Origin of Ultra-High-Energy Cosmic Rays

    Hillas AM. The Origin of Ultra-High-Energy Cosmic Rays. ARA&A. 1984 Jan;22:425–444. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.aa.22.090184.002233

    arXiv 1984

  6. [7]

    TeV Blazars as the Sources of Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays

    Zhang B, Zhao X, Cao Z. TeV Blazars as the Sources of Ultra High Energy Cosmic Rays. International Journal of Astronomy and Astrophysics. 2014 Jan;4(3):499–

    2014

  7. [8]

    Implications of multiwavelength spectrum on cosmic-ray acceleration in blazar TXS 0506+056

    Das S, Gupta N, Razzaque S. Implications of multiwavelength spectrum on cosmic-ray acceleration in blazar TXS 0506+056. A&A. 2022 Dec;668:A146. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202244653. arXiv:2208.00838. [astro-ph.HE]. 26

    work page Pith review arXiv 2022

  8. [9]

    Time Structure of Ultra-High Energy Cosmic Ray Sources and Consequences for Multi-messenger Signatures

    Sigl G. Time structure and multi-messenger signatures of ultra-high energy cosmic ray sources. New Journal of Physics. 2009 Jun;11(6):065014. https://doi.org/10. 1088/1367-2630/11/6/065014. arXiv:0803.3800. [astro-ph]

    work page Pith review arXiv 2009

Show all 96 references
  1. [10]

    https://doi.org/10.4236/ijaa.2014.43046

    2014

  2. [11]

    Ultra High Energy Cosmic Ray Source Models: Suc- cesses, Challenges and General Predictions

    Globus N, Blandford R. Ultra High Energy Cosmic Ray Source Models: Suc- cesses, Challenges and General Predictions. In: European Physical Journal Web of Conferences. vol. 283 of European Physical Journal Web of Conferences; 2023. p. 04001

    2023

  3. [12]

    Search for Spatial Correlations of Neutrinos with Ultra-high-energy Cosmic Rays

    Albert A, Alves S, Andr´ e M, Anghinolfi M, A M, Ardid S, et al. Search for Spatial Correlations of Neutrinos with Ultra-high-energy Cosmic Rays. ApJ. 2022 Aug;934(2):164. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac6def. arXiv:2201.07313. [astro-ph.HE]

    2022

  4. [13]

    The Coherent Magnetic Field of the Milky Way

    Unger M, Farrar GR. The Coherent Magnetic Field of the Milky Way. arXiv e-prints. 2023 Nov;p. arXiv:2311.12120. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2311. 12120. arXiv:2311.12120. [astro-ph.GA]

    2023 doi arXiv

  5. [14]

    Astrophysical Neutrinos and Blazars

    Giommi P, Padovani P. Astrophysical Neutrinos and Blazars. Universe. 2021 Dec;7(12):492. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe7120492. arXiv:2112.06232. [astro-ph.HE]

    2021 arXiv

  6. [15]

    The variability patterns of the TeV blazar PG 1553 + 113 from a decade of MAGIC and multiband observations

    Collaboration: M, collaborators: M. The variability patterns of the TeV blazar PG 1553 + 113 from a decade of MAGIC and multiband observations. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society. 2024 03;529(4):3894–3911. https: //doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae649. https://academic...

    2024 doi

  7. [16]

    Multi-Messenger Connection in High-Energy Neutrino Astron- omy

    Sharma A. Multi-Messenger Connection in High-Energy Neutrino Astron- omy. Universe. 2024 Aug;10(8):326. https://doi.org/10.3390/universe10080326. arXiv:2408.11353. [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  8. [17]

    Neutrinos from flat-spectrum radio quasars

    Mannheim K, Stanev T, Biermann PL. Neutrinos from flat-spectrum radio quasars. A&A. 1992 Jul;260(1-2):L1–L3

    1992

  9. [18]

    The IceCube Neutrino Observatory: instrumentation and online systems

    Aartsen MG, Ackermann M, Adams J, Aguilar JA, Ahlers M, Ahrens M, et al. The IceCube Neutrino Observatory: instrumentation and online systems. Journal of Instrumentation. 2017 mar;12(03):P03012. https://doi.org/10.1088/ 1748-0221/12/03/P03012

    2017

  10. [19]

    High-Energy Neutrinos from Active Galactic Nuclei

    Murase K, Stecker FW. High-Energy Neutrinos from Active Galactic Nuclei. In: Stecker FW, editor. The Encyclopedia of Cosmology. Set 2: Frontiers in Cosmology. Volume 2: Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics; 2023. p. 483–540

    2023

  11. [20]

    Neutrino emission from the direction of the blazar TXS 0506+056 prior to the IceCube-170922A alert

    Collaboration I. Neutrino emission from the direction of the blazar TXS 0506+056 prior to the IceCube-170922A alert. Science. 2018 Jul;361(6398):147–151. https: //doi.org/10.1126/science.aat2890. arXiv:1807.08794. [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  12. [21]

    Ultrahigh-energy Cosmic-Ray Interactions as the Origin of Very High-energy γ-Rays from BL Lacertae Objects

    Das S, Gupta N, Razzaque S. Ultrahigh-energy Cosmic-Ray Interactions as the Origin of Very High-energy γ-Rays from BL Lacertae Objects. ApJ. 2020 Feb;889(2):149. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ab6131. arXiv:1911.06011. [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  13. [22]

    Multimessenger observations of a flaring blazar coincident with high-energy neutrino IceCube-170922A

    Collaboration I. Multimessenger observations of a flaring blazar coincident with high-energy neutrino IceCube-170922A. Science. 2018 Jul;361(6398):eaat1378. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aat1378. arXiv:1807.08816. [astro-ph.HE]. 27

    2018 arXiv

  14. [23]

    CGRaBS: An All-Sky Survey of Gamma-Ray Blazar Candidates

    Healey SE, Romani R W, Cotter G, Michelson PF, Schlafly EF, Readhead ACS, et al. CGRaBS: An All-Sky Survey of Gamma-Ray Blazar Candidates. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 2008 mar;175(1):97. https://doi.org/ 10.1086/523302

    2008 doi

  15. [24]

    Leptohadronic multi-messenger modeling of 324 gamma-ray blazars

    Rodrigues X, Paliya VS, Garrappa S, Omeliukh A, Franckowiak A, Winter W. Leptohadronic multi-messenger modeling of 324 gamma-ray blazars. A&A. 2024 jan;681:A119. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202347540. arXiv:2307.13024. [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  16. [25]

    Cosmogenic gamma-ray and neutrino fluxes from blazars associated with IceCube events

    Das S, Razzaque S, Gupta N. Cosmogenic gamma-ray and neutrino fluxes from blazars associated with IceCube events. A&A. 2022 Feb;658:L6. https://doi.org/ 10.1051/0004-6361/202142123. arXiv:2108.12120. [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  17. [26]

    The Swift Ultra-Violet/Optical Telescope

    Roming PW A, Kennedy TE, Mason KO, Nousek JA, Ahr L, Bingham RE, et al. The Swift Ultra-Violet/Optical Telescope. Space Sci. Rev.. 2005 Oct;120(3-4):95–

    2005

  18. [27]

    THE NUCLEAR SPECTROSCOPIC TELESCOPE ARRAY (NuSTAR) HIGH- ENERGY X-RAY MISSION

    Harrison F A, Craig WW, Christensen FE, Hailey CJ, Zhang WW, Boggs SE, et al. THE NUCLEAR SPECTROSCOPIC TELESCOPE ARRAY (NuSTAR) HIGH- ENERGY X-RAY MISSION. The Astrophysical Journal. 2013 may;770(2):103. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/103

    2013 doi

  19. [28]

    GROND—a 7-Channel Imager

    Greiner J, Bornemann W, Clemens C, Deuter M, Hasinger G, Honsberg M, et al. GROND—a 7-Channel Imager. PASP. 2008 Apr;120(866):405. https://doi.org/ 10.1086/587032. arXiv:0801.4801. [astro-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  20. [29]

    Chandra x-ray observatory (cxo):overview

    Weisskopf MC, Tananbaum HD, van Speybroeck LP, O’Dell SL. Chandra x-ray observatory (cxo):overview. Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2000;4012:2. https: //doi.org/10.1117/12.391545. arXiv:astro-ph/0004127

    arXiv

  21. [30]

    The Swift X-Ray Telescope

    Burrows DN, Hill JE, Nousek JA, Kennea JA, Wells A, Osborne JP, et al. The Swift X-Ray Telescope. Space Sci. Rev.. 2005 Oct;120(3-4):165–195. https://doi. 28 org/10.1007/s11214-005-5097-2. arXiv:astro-ph/0508071. [astro-ph]

    2005 arXiv

  22. [31]

    The Swift/BAT Hard X-Ray Transient Monitor

    Krimm HA, Holland ST, Corbet RHD, Pearlman AB, Romano P, Kennea JA, et al. The Swift/BAT Hard X-Ray Transient Monitor. ApJS. 2013 Nov;209(1):14. https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/209/1/14. arXiv:1309.0755. [astro-ph.HE]

    2013 arXiv

  23. [32]

    H I observations of giant low surface brightness galaxies

    Matthews LD, van Driel W, Monnier-Ragaigne D. H I observations of giant low surface brightness galaxies. A&A. 2001 Jan;365:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1051/ 0004-6361:20000002. arXiv:astro-ph/0010075. [astro-ph]

    2001 arXiv

  24. [33]

    General Physical Properties of CGRaBS Blazars

    Paliya VS, Marcotulli L, Ajello M, Joshi M, Sahayanathan S, Rao AR, et al. General Physical Properties of CGRaBS Blazars. ApJ. 2017 dec;851(1):33. https: //doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/aa98e1. arXiv:1711.01292. [astro-ph.HE]

    2017 arXiv

  25. [34]

    VERITAS Discovery of 200 GeV Gamma-Ray Emission from the Intermediate- Frequency-Peaked BL Lacertae Object W Comae

    Acciari V A, Aliu E, Beilicke M, Benbow W, B¨ ottcher M, Bradbury SM, et al. VERITAS Discovery of 200 GeV Gamma-Ray Emission from the Intermediate- Frequency-Peaked BL Lacertae Object W Comae. ApJ. 2008 Sep;684(2):L73. https://doi.org/10.1086/592244. arXiv:0808.0889. [astro-ph]

    2008 arXiv

  26. [35]

    Multiwave- length Observations of a TeV-Flare from W Comae

    Acciari V A, Aliu E, Aune T, Beilicke M, Benbow W, B¨ ottcher M, et al. Multiwave- length Observations of a TeV-Flare from W Comae. ApJ. 2009 Dec;707(1):612–

    2009

  27. [36]

    THE LARGE AREA TELESCOPE ON THE FERMI GAMMA- RAY SPACE TELESCOPE MISSION

    Atwood WB, Abdo AA, Ackermann M, Althouse W, Anderson B, Axelsson M, et al. THE LARGE AREA TELESCOPE ON THE FERMI GAMMA- RAY SPACE TELESCOPE MISSION. The Astrophysical Journal. 2009 may;697(2):1071. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/697/2/1071

    2009 doi

  28. [37]

    High energy neutrinos from the TeV Blazar 1ES 1959 +

    Halzen F, Hooper D. High energy neutrinos from the TeV Blazar 1ES 1959 +

    1959

  29. [38]

    Simultaneous Multiwavelength Observations of the Blazar 1ES 1959+650 at a Low TeV Flux

    Tagliaferri G, Foschini L, Ghisellini G, Maraschi L, pre=”and” post=”, and” affil=”4”¿G Tosti a, et al. Simultaneous Multiwavelength Observations of the Blazar 1ES 1959+650 at a Low TeV Flux. ApJ. 2008 Jun;679(2):1029–1039. https://doi.org/10.1086/586731. arXiv:0801.4029. [astro-ph]

    1959 arXiv

  30. [39]

    TeV BL Lac objects at the dawn of the Fermi era

    Tavecchio F, Ghisellini G, Ghirlanda G, Foschini L, Maraschi L. TeV BL Lac objects at the dawn of the Fermi era. MNRAS. 2010 Jan;401(3):1570–1586. https: //doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15784.x. arXiv:0909.0651. [astro-ph.HE]

    2010

  31. [40]

    PKS 2005-489 at VHE: four years of monitoring with HESS and simultaneous multi-wavelength observations

    H E S S Collaboration, Acero F, Aharonian F, Akhperjanian AG, Anton G, Barres de Almeida U, et al. PKS 2005-489 at VHE: four years of monitoring with HESS and simultaneous multi-wavelength observations. A&A. 2010 Feb;511:A52. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200913073. arXiv:...

    2005 arXiv

  32. [41]

    Multiwavelength Observations of Strong Flares from the TeV Blazar 1ES 1959+650

    Krawczynski H, Hughes SB, Horan D, Aharonian F, Aller MF, Aller H, et al. Multiwavelength Observations of Strong Flares from the TeV Blazar 1ES 1959+650. ApJ. 2004 Jan;601(1):151–164. https://doi.org/10.1086/380393. arXiv:astro-ph/0310158. [astro-ph]

    1959 arXiv

  33. [42]

    Flux and spectral variability of the blazar PKS 2155 -304 with XMM-Newton: Evidence of particle acceleration and synchrotron cooling

    Bhagwan J, Gupta AC, Papadakis IE, Wiita PJ. Flux and spectral variability of the blazar PKS 2155 -304 with XMM-Newton: Evidence of particle acceleration and synchrotron cooling. New A. 2016 Apr;44:21–28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. newast.2015.08.005. arXiv:1510.02817. [astro-ph.HE]

    2016 arXiv

  34. [43]

    Science with the Cherenkov Telescope Array; 2019

    Consortium CTA. Science with the Cherenkov Telescope Array; 2019

    2019

  35. [44]

    An exploration of hadronic interactions in blazars using IceCube

    Tchernin C, Aguilar JA, Neronov A, Montaruli T. An exploration of hadronic interactions in blazars using IceCube. A&A. 2013 Jul;555:A70. https://doi.org/ 10.1051/0004-6361/201220508. arXiv:1305.3524. [astro-ph.HE]

    2013 arXiv

  36. [45]

    High-energy gamma-ray and neu- trino backgrounds from clusters of galaxies and radio constraints

    Zandanel F, Tamborra I, Gabici S, Ando S. High-energy gamma-ray and neu- trino backgrounds from clusters of galaxies and radio constraints. A&A. 2015 Jun;578:A32. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201425249. arXiv:1410.8697. [astro-ph.HE]

    2015 arXiv

  37. [46]

    Lepto-hadronic γ-Ray and Neutrino Emission from the Jet of TXS 0506+056

    Sahakyan N. Lepto-hadronic γ-Ray and Neutrino Emission from the Jet of TXS 0506+056. ApJ. 2018 Oct;866(2):109. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ aadade. arXiv:1808.05651. [astro-ph.HE]

    2018 arXiv

  38. [47]

    Simultaneous multiwavelength observations of the second exceptional γ-ray flare of PKS 2155-304 in July 2006

    Aharonian F, Akhperjanian AG, Anton G, Barres de Almeida U, Bazer-Bachi AR, Becherini Y, et al. Simultaneous multiwavelength observations of the second exceptional γ-ray flare of PKS 2155-304 in July 2006. A&A. 2009 Aug;502(3):749–

    2006

  39. [48]

    High-energy neutrino fluxes from hard-TeV BL Lacs

    Aguilar-Ruiz E, Fraija N, Galv´ an-G´ amez A. High-energy neutrino fluxes from hard-TeV BL Lacs. Journal of High Energy Astrophysics. 2023 Jun;38:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jheap.2023.02.001. arXiv:2303.13025. [astro-ph.HE]

    2023 arXiv

  40. [49]

    Leptonic and Hadronic Radiative Processes in Supermassive-Black- Hole Jets

    Cerruti M. Leptonic and Hadronic Radiative Processes in Supermassive-Black- Hole Jets. Galaxies. 2020 Oct;8(4):72. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies8040072. arXiv:2012.13302. [astro-ph.HE]

    2020 arXiv

  41. [50]

    Emission from hadronic and leptonic processes in galactic jet-driven bubbles

    Owen ER, Yang HYK. Emission from hadronic and leptonic processes in galactic jet-driven bubbles. MNRAS. 2022 Oct;516(1):1539–1556. https://doi.org/10. 1093/mnras/stac2289. arXiv:2111.01402. [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  42. [51]

    The Morphology of Hadronic Emission Mod- els for the Gamma-Ray Source at the Galactic Center

    Linden T, Lovegrove E, Profumo S. The Morphology of Hadronic Emission Mod- els for the Gamma-Ray Source at the Galactic Center. ApJ. 2012 Jul;753(1):41. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/753/1/41. arXiv:1203.3539. [astro-ph.HE]. 30

    2012 arXiv

  43. [52]

    MAGIC observations provide compelling evidence of hadronic multi-TeV emission from the putative PeVatron SNR G106.3+2.7

    MAGIC Collaboration, Abe H, Abe S, Acciari V A, Agudo I, Aniello T, et al. MAGIC observations provide compelling evidence of hadronic multi-TeV emission from the putative PeVatron SNR G106.3+2.7. A&A. 2023 Mar;671:A12. https: //doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202244931. arXiv:2211.1...

    2023 arXiv

  44. [53]

    Blazars at Very High Energies: Emission Modelling

    Sol H, Zech A. Blazars at Very High Energies: Emission Modelling. Galaxies. 2022 Nov;10(6):105. https://doi.org/10.3390/galaxies10060105. arXiv:2211.03580. [astro-ph.HE]

    2022 arXiv

  45. [54]

    Testing a Lepto-Hadronic Two- Zone Model with Extreme High-Synchrotron Peaked BL Lacs and Track-like High-Energy Neutrinos

    Aguilar-Ruiz E, Galv´ an-G´ amez A, Fraija N. Testing a Lepto-Hadronic Two- Zone Model with Extreme High-Synchrotron Peaked BL Lacs and Track-like High-Energy Neutrinos. Galaxies. 2023 Dec;11(6):117. https://doi.org/10.3390/ galaxies11060117

    2023

  46. [55]

    Hybrid method for identifying mass groups of primary cosmic rays in the joint operation of IACTs and wide angle Cherenkov timing arrays

    Postnikov EB, Grinyuk AA, Kuzmichev LA, Sveshnikova LG. Hybrid method for identifying mass groups of primary cosmic rays in the joint operation of IACTs and wide angle Cherenkov timing arrays. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2017 jan;798(1):012030. https://doi.org/10.10...

    2017 doi

  47. [56]

    Observations of Cosmic Ray sources with the HESS IACT-array and new results on cosmic ray propagation

    Wagner S. Observations of Cosmic Ray sources with the HESS IACT-array and new results on cosmic ray propagation. In: 44th COSPAR Scientific Assembly. Held 16-24 July. vol. 44; 2022. p. 2144

    2022

  48. [57]

    Sensitivity of the Cherenkov Telescope Array to spectral signa- tures of hadronic PeVatrons with application to Galactic Supernova Remnants

    Acero F, Acharyya A, Adam R, Aguasca-Cabot A, Agudo I, Aguirre-Santaella A, et al. Sensitivity of the Cherenkov Telescope Array to spectral signa- tures of hadronic PeVatrons with application to Galactic Supernova Remnants. Astroparticle Physics. 2023;150:102850. https://doi.o...

    2023

  49. [58]

    Cosmic ray acceleration

    Bell AR. Cosmic ray acceleration. Astroparticle Physics. 2013 Mar;43:56–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.astropartphys.2012.05.022

    2013 doi

  50. [59]

    Accessed: 2023-09-15

    : The MAGIC gamma-ray observatory. Accessed: 2023-09-15. https://wwwmagic. mppmu.mpg.de

    2023

  51. [60]

    Accessed: 2023-09-15

    : VERITAS - Very Energetic Radiation Imaging Telescope Array System. Accessed: 2023-09-15. https://veritas.sao.arizona.edu

    2023

  52. [61]

    Revisiting High-energy Polarization from Leptonic and Hadronic Blazar Scenarios

    Zhang H, B¨ ottcher M, Liodakis I. Revisiting High-energy Polarization from Leptonic and Hadronic Blazar Scenarios. ApJ. 2024 Jun;967(2):93. https: //doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ad4112. arXiv:2404.12475. [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  53. [62]

    The Cherenkov Telescope Array Science Goals and Current Status

    CTA Consortium, Ong RA. The Cherenkov Telescope Array Science Goals and Current Status. In: European Physical Journal Web of Conferences. vol. 209 of European Physical Journal Web of Conferences; 2019. p. 01038

    2019

  54. [63]

    The LHAASO experiment: From Gamma- Ray Astronomy to Cosmic Rays

    di Sciascio G, Lhaaso Collaboration. The LHAASO experiment: From Gamma- Ray Astronomy to Cosmic Rays. Nuclear and Particle Physics Proceedings. 2016 Oct;279-281:166–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nuclphysbps.2016.10.024. 31 arXiv:1602.07600. [astro-ph.HE]

    2016 arXiv

  55. [64]

    Measurement of Ultra-High-Energy Diffuse Gamma-Ray Emission of the Galac- tic Plane from 10 TeV to 1 PeV with LHAASO-KM2A

    Cao Z, Aharonian F, An Q, Axikegu YX Bai, Bao YW, Bastieri D, et al. Measurement of Ultra-High-Energy Diffuse Gamma-Ray Emission of the Galac- tic Plane from 10 TeV to 1 PeV with LHAASO-KM2A. Phys. Rev. Lett.. 2023 Oct;131(15):151001. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.131.15...

    2023

  56. [65]

    SWGO: a wide-field of view gamma-ray observatory in the southern hemisphere

    Chiavassa A, SWGO Collaboration. SWGO: a wide-field of view gamma-ray observatory in the southern hemisphere. Journal of Instrumentation. 2024 Feb;19(2):C02065. https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-0221/19/02/C02065

    2024 doi

  57. [66]

    Prospects for the detection of very-high- energy pulsars with LHAASO and SWGO

    Hu Q, Zhang Y, Duan K, Zeng H. Prospects for the detection of very-high- energy pulsars with LHAASO and SWGO. MNRAS. 2024 Jul;531(4):5061–5066. https://doi.org/10.1093/mnras/stae1497. arXiv:2407.00262. [astro-ph.HE]

    2024 arXiv

  58. [67]

    AM3: An Open-source Tool for Time-dependent Lepto-hadronic Modeling of Astrophysical Sources

    Klinger M, Rudolph A, Rodrigues X, Yuan C, de Clairfontaine GF, Fedynitch A, et al. AM3: An Open-source Tool for Time-dependent Lepto-hadronic Modeling of Astrophysical Sources. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 2024 oct;275(1):4. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ad725c

    2024 doi

  59. [68]

    - The High Energy Stereoscopic System

    : H.E.S.S. - The High Energy Stereoscopic System. Accessed: 2023-09-15. https: //www.mpi-hd.mpg.de/hfm/HESS/

    2023

  60. [69]

    QGSJET-III model of high energy hadronic interactions: The formalism

    Ostapchenko S. QGSJET-III model of high energy hadronic interactions: The formalism. Phys. Rev. D. 2024 Feb;109(3):034002. https://doi.org/10.1103/ PhysRevD.109.034002. arXiv:2401.06202. [hep-ph]

    2024 arXiv

  61. [70]

    VERITAS Discovery of > 200 GeV Gamma-Ray Emission from the Intermediate- Frequency-Peaked BL Lacertae Object W Comae

    Acciari V A, Aliu E, Beilicke M, Benbow W, B¨ ottcher M, Bradbury SM, et al. VERITAS Discovery of > 200 GeV Gamma-Ray Emission from the Intermediate- Frequency-Peaked BL Lacertae Object W Comae. The Astrophysical Journal. 2008 aug;684(2):L73. https://doi.org/10.1086/592244

    2008 doi

  62. [71]

    THE EXTRAGALACTIC BACKGROUND LIGHT, THE HUBBLE CONSTANT, AND ANOMALIES: CONCLUSIONS FROM 20 YEARS OF TeV GAMMA-RAY OBSER V ATIONS

    Biteau J, Williams DA. THE EXTRAGALACTIC BACKGROUND LIGHT, THE HUBBLE CONSTANT, AND ANOMALIES: CONCLUSIONS FROM 20 YEARS OF TeV GAMMA-RAY OBSER V ATIONS. The Astrophysical Journal. 2015 oct;812(1):60. https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/812/1/60

    2015 doi

  63. [72]

    PKS2005-489 at VHE: four years of monitor- ing with HESS and simultaneous multi-wavelength observations******

    HESS Collaboration, Acero, F , Aharonian, F , Akhperjanian, A G , Anton, G , Barres de Almeida, U , et al. PKS2005-489 at VHE: four years of monitor- ing with HESS and simultaneous multi-wavelength observations******. A&A. 2010;511:A52. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200913073. 32

    2010 doi

  64. [73]

    Search for Correlations of High-energy Neutrinos Detected in Ice- Cube with Radio-bright AGN and Gamma-Ray Emission from Blazars

    Collaboration I. Search for Correlations of High-energy Neutrinos Detected in Ice- Cube with Radio-bright AGN and Gamma-Ray Emission from Blazars. ApJ. 2023 Sep;954(1):75. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/acdfcb. arXiv:2304.12675. [astro-ph.HE]

    2023

  65. [74]

    A gamma-ray study of galactic PeVatron candidates LHAASO J1825-1326 and LHAASO J1839-0545

    Costa RJ, G¨ otz DB, Anjos RC, Pereira LAS, Mello AJTS. A gamma-ray study of galactic PeVatron candidates LHAASO J1825-1326 and LHAASO J1839-0545. Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics. 2024 7;2024:035. https://doi. org/10.1088/1475-7516/2024/07/035

    2024 doi

  66. [75]

    AM 3: An Open-Source Tool for Time- Dependent Lepto-Hadronic Modeling of Astrophysical Sources

    Klinger M, Rudolph A, Rodrigues X, Yuan C, Fichet de Clairfontaine G, Fedynitch A, et al. AM 3: An Open-Source Tool for Time- Dependent Lepto-Hadronic Modeling of Astrophysical Sources. arXiv e- prints. 2023 Dec;p. arXiv:2312.13371. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2312. 13371. ...

    2023 doi arXiv

  67. [76]

    Gammapy - A prototype for the CTA science tools; 2017

    Deil C, Zanin R, Lefaucheur J, Boisson C, Kh´ elifi B, Terrier R, et al. Gammapy - A prototype for the CTA science tools; 2017

    2017

  68. [77]

    VTSCat: The VERITAS Catalog of Gamma-Ray Observations

    Acharyya A, Adams CB, Archer A, Bangale P, Bartkoske JT, Batista P, et al. VTSCat: The VERITAS Catalog of Gamma-Ray Observations. Research Notes of the AAS. 2023 jan;7(1):6. https://doi.org/10.3847/2515-5172/acb147

    2023 doi

  69. [78]

    Fermi Large Area Telescope Third Source Catalog

    Acero F, Ackermann M, Ajello M, Albert A, Atwood WB, Axelsson M, et al. Fermi Large Area Telescope Third Source Catalog. Astrophysical Journal, Supplement Series. 2015;218. https://doi.org/10.1088/0067-0049/218/2/23

    2015 doi

  70. [79]

    Incre- mental Fermi Large Area Telescope Fourth Source Catalog

    Abdollahi S, Acero F, Baldini L, Ballet J, Bastieri D, Bellazzini R, et al. Incre- mental Fermi Large Area Telescope Fourth Source Catalog. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 2022;260. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ac6751

    2022 doi

  71. [80]

    2FHL: THE SECOND CATALOG OF HARD FERMI-LAT SOURCES

    Ackermann M, Ajello M, Atwood WB, Baldini L, Ballet J, Barbiellini G, et al. 2FHL: THE SECOND CATALOG OF HARD FERMI-LAT SOURCES. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 2016 1;222:5. https://doi.org/10.3847/ 0067-0049/222/1/5

    2016

  72. [81]

    3FHL: The Third Catalog of Hard Fermi -LAT Sources

    Ajello M, Atwood WB, Baldini L, Ballet J, Barbiellini G, Bastieri D, et al. 3FHL: The Third Catalog of Hard Fermi -LAT Sources. The Astrophysical Journal Supplement Series. 2017;232. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/aa8221

    2017 doi

  73. [82]

    Gammapy: A Python package for gamma-ray astronomy

    Donath, Axel, Terrier, R´ egis, Remy, Quentin, Sinha, Atreyee, Nigro, Cosimo, Pintore, Fabio, et al. Gammapy: A Python package for gamma-ray astronomy. A&A. 2023;678:A157. https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/202346488

    2023 doi

  74. [83]

    The VLBA Extragalactic Proper Motion Catalog and a Measurement of the Secular Aberration Drift

    Truebenbach AE, Darling J. The VLBA Extragalactic Proper Motion Catalog and a Measurement of the Secular Aberration Drift. The Astrophysical Jour- nal Supplement Series. 2017 nov;233(1):3. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4365/ aa9026. 33

    2017 doi

  75. [84]

    Imaging Sources in the Third Realization of the International Celestial Reference Frame

    Hunt LR, Johnson MC, Cigan PJ, Gordon D, Spitzak J. Imaging Sources in the Third Realization of the International Celestial Reference Frame. The Astronomical Journal. 2021 aug;162(3):121. https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-3881/ ac135d

    2021 doi

  76. [85]

    Structure Effects for 3417 Celestial Reference Frame Radio Sources

    Xu MH, Anderson JM, Heinkelmann R, Lunz S, Schuh H, Wang GL. Structure Effects for 3417 Celestial Reference Frame Radio Sources. The Astrophys- ical Journal Supplement Series. 2019 may;242(1):5. https://doi.org/10.3847/ 1538-4365/ab16ea

    2019

  77. [86]

    IVS OBSER V ATION OF ICRF2-GAIA TRANSFER SOURCES

    Bail KL, Gipson JM, Gordon D, MacMillan DS, Behrend D, Thomas CC, et al. IVS OBSER V ATION OF ICRF2-GAIA TRANSFER SOURCES. The Astro- nomical Journal. 2016 feb;151(3):79. https://doi.org/10.3847/0004-6256/151/3/ 79

    2016 doi

  78. [87]

    An observational determination of the evolving extragalactic background light from the multiwavelength HST/CANDELS survey in the Fermi and CTA era

    Saldana-Lopez A, Dom ´ ınguez A, P´ erez-Gonz´ alez PG, Finke J, Ajello M, Pri- mack JR, et al. An observational determination of the evolving extragalactic background light from the multiwavelength HST/CANDELS survey in the Fermi and CTA era. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astr...

    2021 doi

  79. [88]

    A new look at the statistical model identification

    Akaike H. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control. 1974;19(6):716–723. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974. 1100705

    1974 doi

  80. [89]

    Ballet J, Bruel P, Burnett TH, Lott B, collaboration TFL.: Fermi Large Area Telescope Fourth Source Catalog Data Release 4 (4FGL-DR4)

  81. [90]

    Observatory CTA, Consortium CTA.: CTAO Instrument Response Functions - prod5 version v0.1. Zenodo. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo. 5499840

    doi

  82. [91]

    The Australia Telescope National Facility Pulsar Catalogue

    Manchester RN, Hobbs GB, Teoh A, Hobbs M. The Australia Telescope National Facility Pulsar Catalogue. The Astronomical Journal. 2005 4;129:1993–2006. https://doi.org/10.1086/428488. 34

    2005 doi

  83. [96]

    Detection methods for the Cherenkov Telescope Array at very-short exposure times

    Di Piano, Ambra and Bulgarelli, Andrea and Fioretti, Valentina and Baron- celli, Leonardo and Parmiggiani, Nicol` o and Longo, Francesco and Stamerra, Antonio and L´ opez-Oramas, Alicia and Stratta, Giulia and De Cesare, and Gio- vanni. Detection methods for the Cherenkov Tele...

    2021 arXiv

  84. [142]

    arXiv:astro-ph/0507413

    https://doi.org/10.1007/s11214-005-5095-4. arXiv:astro-ph/0507413. [astro- ph]

    arXiv

  85. [620]

    arXiv:0910.3750

    https://doi.org/10.1088/0004-637X/707/1/612. arXiv:0910.3750. [astro- ph.HE]

    arXiv

  86. [650]

    2005 Jul;23(6):537–542

    Astroparticle Physics. 2005 Jul;23(6):537–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j. astropartphys.2005.03.007. arXiv:astro-ph/0502449. [astro-ph]

    2005 arXiv

  87. [770]

    arXiv:0906.2002

    https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/200912128. arXiv:0906.2002. [astro- ph.CO]

    2002 arXiv

  88. [1174]

    https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.75.1169

    doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.