Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 103 references

Spatially Multiplexed Interferometric Microscopy with one-dimensional diffraction grating

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This review claims that a one-dimensional diffraction grating, a split input plane, and a coherent light source can convert a standard bright-field microscope into a stable, low-cost holographic microscope for quantitative phase imaging.

desk verdict A clear, self-contained review of the authors' own SMIM variants, short on new content and on alignment tolerances, but a fair overview for QPI newcomers. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.10023 v1 pith:H4XP4U5T submitted 2025-01-17 physics.optics

Jose Angel Picazo-Bueno , Maciej Trusiak , Javier Garcia , Vicente Mico This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords digitalholographicmicroscopyquantitativephaseimagingspatiallymultiplexedinterferometriccommon-pathinterferometrydiffractiongratingsuperresolutionpartiallycoherentilluminationsingle-shotretrieval
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that a conventional bright-field microscope can be converted into a digital holographic microscope for quantitative phase imaging by three minimal modifications: swapping broadband illumination for a coherent or partially coherent source, dividing the input plane into object, reference, and blocked regions, and inserting a one-dimensional diffraction grating. The central claim is that this grating-based spatially multiplexed interferometric microscopy (SMIM) is a cost-effective, simple, and vibration-robust common-path alternative to Mach-Zehnder digital holography, because object and reference beams pass through the same microscope optics. The review gathers experimental evidence across five SMIM variants: conventional, superresolved, reflective/transflective, partially coherent, and single-shot Hilbert-Huang. If the claim holds, quantitative phase imaging of cells and technical samples becomes an add-on capability for existing microscopes rather than a dedicated instrument.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing element is the 1D diffraction grating, usually a Ronchi grating, inserted in the analyser slot of the microscope just before the tube lens. It creates several laterally shifted replicas of the image; with the input plane spatially multiplexed into object, reference, and blocked regions of equal size, choosing the grating frequency so the shift equals one third (or one half) of the field of view makes the reference replica overlap the object replica coherently while the dark replica cancels spurious interference. The grating's axial position also sets the holographic configuration: placed far from the Fourier plane it gives off-axis holograms amenable to Fourier filtering, while near the Fourier plane it allows on-axis or slightly off-axis recording suited to phase shifting and Hilbert-Huang single-shot retrieval.

What would settle it

Record SMIM holograms of a calibrated phase target while detuning the grating spatial frequency and translating or rotating the grating or the input mask, then compare the recovered phase against a conventional Mach-Zehnder holographic reference. The central claim predicts a sharp, reproducible tolerance window within which phase error stays low; if phase error degrades gradually from nominal alignment, the 'highly stable' characterization would need revision.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a 1D diffraction grating placed in the infinity space of an infinity-corrected microscope produces shifted replicas of the image field, and when the lateral shift is set to one third (or one half) of the field of view, the object region from one diffraction order interferes coherently with the reference region from another order while a blocked region suppresses spurious light, forming a digital hologram. This makes SMIM a common-path interferometric method in which both beams travel through the same objective, giving high stability and low cost. The review presents validations showing quantitative phase agreement with a conventional Mach-Zehnder layout, a factor-of-two resolution gain in superresolved mode, reflective thickness measurement matching atomic force microscopy, roughly tenfold coherent-noise reduction with partially coherent illumination, and single-shot phase retrieval of flowing beads. On the paper's own terms, SMIM with a 1D grating is a validated route to upgrading a standard microscope into a holographic one.

Load-bearing premise

This method assumes that a grating placed in the microscope's parallel-beam space creates replicas whose lateral shift can be set to exactly one third (or one half) of the field of view, so the blocked region cancels spurious light; the review states this follows from choosing the grating frequency but does not quantify the alignment tolerance.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A standard biological microscope can be upgraded to quantitative phase imaging with a laser diode, a Ronchi grating, and a spatial mask, enabling label-free analysis of cells.
  • SMIM can operate in reflection and in simultaneous transmission/reflection modes, extending quantitative phase imaging to opaque and transflective samples.
  • Partially coherent illumination cuts coherent noise by about an order of magnitude, improving phase stability and image quality.
  • Single-shot operation is possible using Hilbert-Huang demodulation, allowing dynamic samples such as flowing beads or migrating cells to be tracked.
  • Superresolved SMIM doubles resolution at low numerical aperture, so low-magnification objectives can match the resolution of higher-NA lenses over a larger field.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because SMIM needs a clear reference region somewhere in the field, its practical ceiling is set by sample density: dense or confluent samples would require custom chambers with built-in reference windows, a constraint the review mentions but does not quantify.
  • The review does not give alignment tolerances, so a systematic study of phase error versus grating frequency, grating rotation, and input-mask position would sharpen the practical claim of stability.
  • The same grating-based multiplexing idea may combine with fluorescence or structured illumination, as the review hints, but those combinations remain speculative until demonstrated.
  • If the cost and stability trade holds, a grating-based SMIM add-on could become a standard microscope port option for clinical and microfluidic diagnostics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. This manuscript is a review of Spatially Multiplexed Interferometric Microscopy (SMIM) as implemented with a one-dimensional diffraction grating, authored largely by the group that developed the technique. It describes the working principle (replacing broadband illumination with a coherent/partially coherent source, spatially multiplexing the input plane into two or three regions, and inserting a 1D grating in the infinity space of a standard microscope), and then summarizes five families of experimental validations: conventional SMIM, superresolved SMIM (S2MIM), opposed-view SMIM (OV-SMIM) for reflective/transflective imaging, partially-coherent-illumination SMIM, and Hilbert-Huang single-shot SMIM (H2S2MIM). The central assertion is that SMIM is a cost-effective, simple, and highly stable method for converting a regular bright-field microscope into a holographic one capable of quantitative phase imaging.

Significance. If the central claims hold, SMIM provides a practical low-cost upgrade path for standard microscopes to perform QPI, with demonstrated capabilities in superresolution, reflective/transflective imaging, noise reduction, and single-shot operation. The review collects a coherent body of work and includes concrete quantitative comparisons, such as a resolution gain factor of 2 in S2MIM (Sec. 3.2), a phase-noise STD reduction from 0.31 to 0.033 rad with partially coherent illumination (Sec. 3.4), and a reflective SMIM thickness measurement of 82 nm versus 85 nm by AFM (Sec. 3.3). A clear strength is the presentation of many experimental figures and the explicit naming of equipment and gratings, which makes the review potentially useful as a guide. However, a major limitation is that all validation claims rest on the authors' own prior publications (refs [56,57,62,77,78,79,80,81,82,83,84]); no independent replication, uncertainty analysis, or systematic error discussion is provided. The significance therefore depends on accepting the original papers' results at face value.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 2, Fig. 1] The core geometric condition for SMIM—that the diffraction-grating-generated replicas must be laterally displaced by exactly one third (or one half) of the image FOV—is stated without derivation or quantitative design rule. The text merely says 'That can be achieved by a proper selection of the spatial frequency of the grating.' For a reader wanting to implement SMIM, the governing relation (e.g., delta = f_tube * tan(arcsin(lambda/d))) should be given, and the gratings used later (80, 50, 40, and 20 lp/mm in Secs. 3.1–3.5) should be shown to satisfy the condition for the BX60 microscope's tube-lens focal length and the stated sensor cropping. Furthermore, no alignment tolerance or calibration step is provided, so the 'simple and cost-effective' claim is not fully supported by the text itself.
  2. [Sec. 3.4, Sec. 3.5] The choice of a 20 lp/mm grating for partially coherent illumination is attributed to the ~50 μm coherence length of the SLD, but the quantitative constraint is not given. The relation between the optical path difference between the 0th and +1st orders (which depends on grating frequency, wavelength, and tube-lens focal length) and the coherence length should be stated explicitly. Without this, the forced switch from off-axis to temporal phase-shifting (and later to Hilbert-Huang processing) appears as an unexplained empirical choice rather than a derived design rule.
  3. [Sec. 3 (overall)] The reported quantitative validations—resolution gain factor of 2, phase STD reduction by a factor of about 10, and AFM-comparable thickness measurements—are all drawn from the authors' prior papers and are not accompanied by uncertainty estimates, error bars, or a description of systematic-error sources. Since the review's purpose is to present SMIM as a validated technique, at least one paragraph should address the reproducibility of these numbers across setups and the limitations of the self-validation approach. This is not to question the authors' integrity, but to give the reader realistic expectations when implementing SMIM.
minor comments (3)
  1. [General] The manuscript contains several typos: 'replacament', 'tranmission', and 'inse rtion' in Sec. 2, 'Nationaly Science Center' in the Acknowledgements, and 'S2H2PM' in Sec. 3.5 where 'H2S2MIM' is meant.
  2. [References] References [79] and [84] are duplicates of the same Opposed-view SMIM paper (J. Opt. 21, 35701), with one entry lacking the article number. This should be corrected.
  3. [Sec. 2] The text first describes a three-region input plane and later, in Sec. 3.4, a two-region version; the relationship between the two geometries and the conditions under which the blocking X region can be omitted should be clarified in a single place.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity found; the review reports previously published experimental results with external validation.

full rationale

This paper is a review of the authors' own SMIM implementations. Its central claim is that SMIM, a common-path interferometric layout in a standard microscope, provides cost-effective, stable quantitative phase imaging. The working principle in Section 2 states that a 1D grating creates shifted replicas and that an interference pattern is recorded when the lateral displacement equals 1/3 of the image FOV, 'achieved by a proper selection of the spatial frequency of the grating.' This is a design condition, not a derived prediction, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction. The experimental validations are quoted from prior papers by the same group, but those cited results include external benchmarks: phase values compared against a conventional Mach-Zehnder DHM layout and a thickness measurement of 82 nm verified by AFM at about 85 nm. These are externally falsifiable measurements, not results that reduce to the review's own inputs. The heavy self-citation is noticeable but not load-bearing circularity: the review does not invoke a self-cited theorem to make its choice forced, nor does it define SMIM in terms of its claimed capabilities. The lack of a quantitative grating-frequency relation and alignment tolerances is a completeness limitation, not a circularity. Under the stated rules, no circular step can be exhibited with a specific equation or construction, so the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The review contributes no new free parameters or invented entities. It relies on standard Fourier optics, the coherence length formula, and the domain assumption of an infinity-corrected microscope with a clear reference region. All numerical values are carried over from the authors' prior experimental papers.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Fourier optics model of a 1D grating producing shifted replicas at the output plane (Section 2).
    The working principle assumes that a sinusoidal/Ronchi grating generates 0th and +/-1st order replicas whose lateral displacement depends on grating frequency and axial position, and that these replicas interfere on the sensor.
  • standard math Coherence length formula L_C = k * lambda^2 / Delta_lambda with k = 0.66 for Gaussian spectrum (Section 3.4).
    Used to compute the SLD coherence length (~50 um) and justify the choice of a 20 lp/mm grating.
  • domain assumption Infinity-corrected microscope with parallel beam space between objective and tube lens (Section 3).
    All experimental validations use an Olympus BX60 infinity-corrected microscope; the technique relies on inserting the grating in the infinity space without additional aberrations.
  • domain assumption A clear region beside the sample is available for reference beam generation (Section 2 and 4).
    SMIM requires a reference region; the review notes this limits the useful FOV to 1/3 or 1/2 and may require custom chambers. The central claim of applicability depends on this condition.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spatially Multiplexed Interferometric Microscopy with one-dimensional diffraction grating." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/H4XP4U5T

@misc{pith2026250110023,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spatially Multiplexed Interferometric Microscopy with one-dimensional diffraction grating},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/H4XP4U5T}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.10023}
}
read the original abstract

Digital holographic microscopy (DHM) applied to quantitative phase imaging (QPI) has been successfully demonstrated as a powerful label-free method to analyse the optical properties of cells. Spatially multiplexed interferometric microscopy (SMIM) is a DHM technique that implements a common-path interferometric layout in the embodiment of a standard microscope to achieve QPI. More concretely, SMIM introduces three minimal modifications: 1) replaces the broadband illumination of the microscope by a coherent or partially coherent light source, 2) divides the input plane into two or three regions for transmission in parallel of both imaging and reference beams, and 3) includes a one-dimensional diffraction grating or a beam splitter cube for holographic recording. Hence, SMIM is a cost-effective, extremely simple, and highly stable manner of converting a standard bright field microscope into a holographic one. The goal of this contribution is to provide a review of the SMIM approaches implemented using a one-dimensional (1D) diffraction grating, and highlight vast range of capabilities including super-resolved, reflective, transflective, noise-reduced and single-shot slightly off-axis amplitude and phase imaging.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.10023 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Optical scheme of a regular microscope before (a) and after (b) SMIM application, pointing the modifications introduced by SMIM. Finally, a 1D diffraction grating is properly placed to produce an interference pattern between the O’, R’ and X’ regions onto the recording area, thus creating a digital hologram. Assuming a 1D sinusoidal grating, three shifted replicas of the image of the FOV are generated at the output … view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

103 extracted references · 80 canonical work pages

  1. [79]

    Picazo-Bueno J A and Micó V 2019 Opposed-view spatially multiplexed interferometric microscopy J. Opt. (United Kingdom) 21 35701

    work page 2019

  2. [84]

    Picazo-Bueno J A and Micó V 2019 Opposed-view spatially multiplexed interferometric microscopy J. Opt. (United Kingdom) 21

    work page 2019

  3. [1]

    Popescu G 2011 Quantitative phase imaging of cells and tissues (McGraw-Hill)

    2011

  4. [2]

    Photonics 12 578–89

    Park Y K, Depeursinge C and Popescu G 2018 Quantitative phase imaging in biomedicine Nat. Photonics 12 578–89

    2018

  5. [3]

    Principles, techniques, and applications (Springer US)

    Kim M K 2011 Digital holographic microscopy. Principles, techniques, and applications (Springer US)

    2011

  6. [4]

    Shaked N T, Zalevsky Z and Satterwhite L L 2013 Biomedical Optical Phase Microscopy and Nanoscopy (Elsevier Inc.)

    2013

  7. [5]

    von Bally G 1979 Holography in Medicine and Biology vol 18 (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg)

    1979

  8. [6]

    Marquet P, Rappaz B, Magistretti P J, Cuche E, Emery Y, Colomb T and Depeursinge C 2005 Digital holographic microscopy: a noninvasive contrast imaging technique allowing quantitative visualization of living cells with subwavelength axial accuracy Opt. Lett. 30 468

    2005

Show all 103 references
  1. [7]

    Express 13 9361

    Rappaz B, Marquet P, Cuche E, Emery Y, Depeursinge C and Magistretti P J 2005 Measurement of the integral refractive index and dynamic cell morphometry of living cells with digital holographic microscopy Opt. Express 13 9361

    2005

  2. [8]

    Kemper B and Von Bally G 2008 Digital holographic microscopy for live cell applications and technical inspection Appl. Opt. 47

    2008

  3. [9]

    Kühn J, Charrière F, Colomb T, Cuche E, Montfort F, Emery Y, Marquet P and Depeursinge C 2008 Axial sub- nanometer accuracy in digital holographic microscopy Meas. Sci. Technol. 19

    2008

  4. [10]

    Lin Y C and Cheng C J 2010 Determining the refractive index profile of micro-optical elements using transflective digital holographic microscopy J. Opt. 12

    2010

  5. [11]

    Wang S, Xue L, Lai J and Li Z 2012 Three-dimensional refractive index reconstruction of red blood cells with one- dimensional moving based on local plane wave approximation J. Opt. (United Kingdom) 14

    2012

  6. [12]

    Part A 85 1030–6

    Memmolo P, Miccio L, Merola F, Gennari O, Netti P A and Ferraro P 2014 3D morphometry of red blood cells by digital holography Cytom. Part A 85 1030–6

    2014

  7. [13]

    Cuche E, Marquet P and Depeursinge C 1999 Simultaneous amplitude-contrast and quantitative phase- contrast microscopy by numerical reconstruction of Fresnel off-axis holograms Appl. Opt. 38 6994

    1999

  8. [14]

    Cuche E, Bevilacqua F and Depeursinge C 1999 Digital holography for quantitative phase-contrast imaging Opt. Lett. 24 291

    1999

  9. [15]

    Cuche E, Marquet P and Depeursinge C 2000 Spatial filtering for zero-order and twin-image elimination in digital off-axis holography Appl. Opt. 39 4070

    2000

  10. [16]

    Express 13 8693

    Mann C J, Yu L, Lo C-M and Kim M K 2005 High- resolution quantitative phase-contrast microscopy by digital holography Opt. Express 13 8693

    2005

  11. [17]

    Charrière F, Marian A, Montfort F, Kuehn J, Colomb T, Cuche E, Marquet P and Depeursinge C 2006 Cell refractive index tomography by digital holographic microscopy Opt. Lett. 31 178

    2006

  12. [18]

    Gabor D 1948 A new microscopic principle Nature 161 777–8

    1948

  13. [19]

    Rogers G L 1952 XIV.—Experiments in diffraction microscopy Proc. R. Soc. Edinburgh. Sect. A. Math. Phys. Sci. 63 193–221

    1952

  14. [20]

    Gabor D and Goss W P 1966 Interference Microscope with Total Wavefront Reconstruction J. Opt. Soc. Am. 56 849

    1966

  15. [21]

    Goodman J W and Lawrence R W 1967 Digital image formation from electronically detected holograms Appl. Phys. Lett. 11 77–9

    1967

  16. [22]

    Kim M K 2010 Principles and techniques of digital holographic microscopy SPIE Rev. 1

    2010

  17. [23]

    Express 13 6738

    Ferraro P, Grilli S, Alfieri D, De Nicola S, Finizio A, Pierattini G, Javidi B, Coppola G and Striano V 2005 Extended focused image in microscopy by digital 11 holography Opt. Express 13 6738

    2005

  18. [24]

    Picart P 2015 New techniques in digital holography

    2015

  19. [25]

    Dubois F, Yourassowsky C, Monnom O, Legros J-C, Debeir O, Van Ham P, Kiss R and Decaestecker C 2006 Digital holographic microscopy for the three-dimensional dynamic analysis of in vitro cancer cell migration J. Biomed. Opt. 11 054032

    2006

  20. [26]

    Mann C J, Yu L and Kim M K 2006 Movies of cellular and sub-cellular motion by digital holographic microscopy Biomed. Eng. Online 5 1–10

    2006

  21. [27]

    Express 15 10761

    DaneshPanah M and Javidi B 2007 Tracking biological microorganisms in sequence of 3D holographic microscopy images Opt. Express 15 10761

    2007

  22. [28]

    Sun H, Song B, Dong H, Reid B, Player M A, Watson J and Zhao M 2008 Visualization of fast-moving cells in vivo using digital holographic video microscopy J. Biomed. Opt. 13 014007

    2008

  23. [29]

    Langehanenberg P, Ivanova L, Bernhardt I, Ketelhut S, Vollmer A, Dirksen D, Georgiev G, von Bally G and Kemper B 2009 Automated three-dimensional tracking of living cells by digital holographic microscopy J. Biomed. Opt. 14 014018

    2009

  24. [30]

    2 256– 9

    Javidi B, Daneshpanah M and Moon I 2010 Three- dimensional holographic imaging for identification of biological micro/nanoorganisms IEEE Photonics J. 2 256– 9

    2010

  25. [31]

    Express 20 28485

    Memmolo P, Iannone M, Ventre M, Netti P A, Finizio A, Paturzo M and Ferraro P 2012 On the holographic 3D tracking of in vitro cells characterized by a highly- morphological change Opt. Express 20 28485

    2012

  26. [32]

    Merola F, Miccio L, Memmolo P, Paturzo M, Grilli S and Ferraro P 2012 Simultaneous optical manipulation, 3-D tracking, and imaging of micro-objects by digital holography in microfluidics IEEE Photonics J. 4 451–4

    2012

  27. [33]

    Moon I and Javidi B 2007 Three-dimensional identification of stem cells by computational holographic imaging J. R. Soc. Interface 4 305–13

    2007

  28. [34]

    Mölder A, Sebesta M, Gustafsson M, Gisselson L, Wingren A G and Alm K 2008 Non-invasive, label-free cell counting and quantitative analysis of adherent cells using digital holography J. Microsc. 232 240–7

    2008

  29. [35]

    Seo S, Isikman S O, Sencan I, Mudanyali O, Su T W, Bishara W, Erlinger A and Ozcan A 2010 High-throughput lens-free blood analysis on a chip Anal. Chem. 82 4621–7

    2010

  30. [36]

    3 546– 54

    Anand A, Chhaniwal V K and Javidi B 2011 Imaging embryonic stem cell dynamics using quantitative 3-D digital holographic microscopy IEEE Photonics J. 3 546– 54

    2011

  31. [37]

    Liu R, Dey D K, Boss D, Marquet P and Javidi B 2011 Recognition and classification of red blood cells using digital holographic microscopy and data clustering with discriminant analysis J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 28 1204

    2011

  32. [38]

    Express 19 23215

    Memmolo P, Di Caprio G, Distante C, Paturzo M, Puglisi R, Balduzzi D, Galli A, Coppola G and Ferraro P 2011 Identification of bovine sperm head for morphometry analysis in quantitative phase-contrast holographic microscopy Opt. Express 19 23215

    2011

  33. [39]

    Mihailescu M, Scarlat M, Gheorghiu A, Costescu J, Kusko M, Paun I A and Scarlat E 2011 Automated imaging, identification, and counting of similar cells from digital hologram reconstructions Appl. Opt. 50 3589–97

    2011

  34. [40]

    Express 20 10295

    Moon I, Javidi B, Yi F, Boss D and Marquet P 2012 Automated statistical quantification of three-dimensional morphology and mean corpuscular hemoglobin of multiple red blood cells Opt. Express 20 10295

    2012

  35. [41]

    Yi F, Moon I, Javidi B, Boss D and Marquet P 2013 Automated segmentation of multiple red blood cells with digital holographic microscopy J. Biomed. Opt. 18 026006

    2013

  36. [42]

    Daneshpanah M, Zwick S, Schaal F, Warber M, Javidi B and Osten W 2010 3D holographic imaging and trapping for non-invasive cell identification and tracking IEEE/OSA J. Disp. Technol. 6 490–9

    2010

  37. [43]

    Biophotonics 5 9–13

    Esseling M, Kemper B, Antkowiak M, Stevenson D J, Chaudet L, Neil M A A, French P W, von Bally G, Dholakia K and Denz C 2012 Multimodal biophotonic workstation for live cell analysis J. Biophotonics 5 9–13

    2012

  38. [44]

    Biophotonics 6 260–6

    Kemper B, Barroso Á, Woerdemann M, Dewenter L, Vollmer A, Schubert R, Mellmann A, von Bally G and Denz C 2013 Towards 3D modelling and imaging of infection scenarios at the single cell level using holographic optical tweezers and digital holographic microscopy J. Biophotonics 6 260–6

    2013

  39. [45]

    Bhaduri B, Edwards C, Pham H, Zhou R, Nguyen T H, Goddard L L and Popescu G 2014 Diffraction phase microscopy: principles and applications in materials and life sciences Adv. Opt. Photonics 6 57

    2014

  40. [46]

    Zhang T and Yamaguchi I 1998 Three-dimensional microscopy with phase-shifting 23 1221–3

    1998

  41. [47]

    Dubois F, Joannes L and Legros J-C 1999 Improved three- dimensional imaging with a digital holography microscope with a source of partial spatial coherence Appl. Opt. 38 7085

    1999

  42. [48]

    Iwai H, Fang-Yen C, Popescu G, Wax A, Badizadegan K, Dasari R R and Feld M S 2004 Quantitative phase imaging using actively stabilized phase-shifting low-coherence interferometry Opt. Lett. 29 2399

    2004

  43. [49]

    Gale D M, Pether M I and Dainty J C 1996 Linnik microscope imaging of integrated circuit structures Appl. Opt. 35 131

    1996

  44. [50]

    Popescu G, Ikeda T, Dasari R R and Feld M S 2006 Diffraction phase microscopy for quantifying cell structure and dynamics Opt. Lett. 31 775

    2006

  45. [51]

    Gao P, Harder I, Nercissian V, Mantel K and Yao B 2010 for Microscopy Opt. Lett. 35 712–4

    2010

  46. [52]

    Lasers Eng

    Kemper B, Stürwald S, Remmersmann C, Langehanenberg P and von Bally G 2008 Characterisation of light emitting diodes (LEDs) for application in digital holographic microscopy for inspection of micro and nanostructured surfaces Opt. Lasers Eng. 46 499–507

    2008

  47. [53]

    Kemper B, Vollmer A, Rommel C E, Schnekenburger J and Bally G von 2011 Simplified approach for quantitative digital holographic phase contrast imaging of living cells J. Biomed. Opt. 16 026014

    2011

  48. [54]

    Express 24 18408

    Jeon S, Cho J, Jin J, Park N-C and Park Y-P 2016 Dual- wavelength digital holography with a single low-coherence light source Opt. Express 24 18408

    2016

  49. [55]

    Express 26 2123

    Cho J, Lim J, Jeon S, Choi G-J, Moon H, Park N-C and Park Y-P 2018 Dual-wavelength off-axis digital holography using a single light-emitting diode Opt. Express 26 2123

    2018

  50. [56]

    Express 14 5168

    Mico V, Zalevsky Z and García J 2006 Superresolution optical system by common-path interferometry Opt. Express 14 5168

    2006

  51. [57]

    Nanophotonics 3 031780

    Mico V 2009 Quantitative phase imaging by common- path interferometric microscopy: application to super- resolved imaging and nanophotonics J. Nanophotonics 3 031780

    2009

  52. [58]

    Express 18 1569

    Ding H and Popescu G 2010 Instantaneous spatial light 12 interference microscopy Opt. Express 18 1569

    2010

  53. [59]

    Shaked N T, Zhu Y, Badie N, Bursac N and Wax A 2010 Reflective interferometric chamber for quantitative phase imaging of biological sample dynamics J. Biomed. Opt. 15 030503

    2010

  54. [60]

    Chhaniwal V, Singh A S G, Leitgeb R A, Javidi B and Anand A 2012 Quantitative phase-contrast imaging with compact digital holographic microscope employing Lloyd’s mirror Opt. Lett. 37 5127

    2012

  55. [61]

    Express 20 23617

    Singh A S G, Anand A, Leitgeb R A and Javidi B 2012 Lateral shearing digital holographic imaging of small biological specimens Opt. Express 20 23617

    2012

  56. [62]

    Express 22 14929

    Mico V, Ferreira C, Zalevsky Z and García J 2014 Spatially-multiplexed interferometric microscopy (SMIM): converting a standard microscope into a holographic one Opt. Express 22 14929

    2014

  57. [63]

    Mico V, Zalevsky Z, García-Martínez P and García J 2006 Synthetic aperture superresolution with multiple off-axis holograms J. Opt. Soc. Am. A 23 3162

    2006

  58. [64]

    Shaked N T 2012 Quantitative phase microscopy of biological samples using a portable interferometer Opt. Lett. 37 2016

    2012

  59. [65]

    Express 21 5701

    Girshovitz P and Shaked N T 2013 Compact and portable low-coherence interferometer with off-axis geometry for quantitative phase microscopy and nanoscopy Opt. Express 21 5701

    2013

  60. [66]

    Fu D, Oh S, Choi W, Yamauchi T, Dorn A, Yaqoob Z, Dasari R R and Feld M S 2010 Quantitative DIC microscopy using an off-axis self-interference approach Opt. Lett. 35 2370

    2010

  61. [67]

    Ferrari J A and Frins E M 2007 Single-element interferometer Opt. Commun. 279 235–9

    2007

  62. [68]

    Express 20 26906

    Gabai H and Shaked N T 2012 Dual-channel low- coherence interferometry and its application to quantitative phase imaging of fingerprints Opt. Express 20 26906

    2012

  63. [69]

    León-Rodríguez M, Rayas J A, Cordero R R, Martínez- García A, Martínez-Gonzalez A, Téllez-Quiñones A, Yañez-Contreras P and Medina-Cázares O 2018 Dual- plane slightly off-axis digital holography based on a single cube beam splitter Appl. Opt. 57 2727

    2018

  64. [70]

    Ebrahimi S, Dashtdar M, Sánchez-Ortiga E, Martínez- Corral M and Javidi B 2018 Stable and simple quantitative phase-contrast imaging by Fresnel biprism Appl. Phys. Lett. 112 1–5

    2018

  65. [71]

    Guo R, Yao B, Gao P, Min J, Zhou M, Han J, Yu X, Yu X, Lei M, Yan S, Yang Y, Dan D and Ye T 2013 Off-axis digital holographic microscopy with LED illumination based on polarization filtering Appl. Opt. 52 8233–8

    2013

  66. [72]

    Karepov S, Shaked N T and Ellenbogen T 2015 Off-axis interferometer with adjustable fringe contrast based on polarization encoding Opt. Lett. 40 2273

    2015

  67. [73]

    Roitshtain D, Turko N A, Javidi B and Shaked N T 2016 Flipping interferometry and its application for quantitative phase microscopy in a micro-channel Opt. Lett. 41 2354

    2016

  68. [74]

    Express 17 13080

    Bon P, Maucort G, Wattellier B and Monneret S 2009 Quadriwave lateral shearing interferometry for quantitative phase microscopy of living cells Opt. Express 17 13080

    2009

  69. [75]

    Express 18 16685

    Cui X, Ren J, Tearney G J and Yang C 2010 Wavefront image sensor chip Opt. Express 18 16685

    2010

  70. [76]

    Merola F, Miccio L, Paturzo M, Finizio A, Grilli S and Ferraro P 2011 Driving and analysis of micro-objects by digital holographic microscope in microfluidics Opt. Lett. 36 3079

    2011

  71. [77]

    Mico V, Zalevsky Z and García J 2008 Common-path phase-shifting digital holographic microscopy: A way to quantitative phase imaging and superresolution Opt. Commun. 281 4273–81

    2008

  72. [78]

    Picazo-Bueno J Á, Zalevsky Z, García J and Micó V 2017 Superresolved spatially multiplexed interferometric microscopy Opt. Lett. 42 927

    2017

  73. [80]

    Picazo-Bueno J Á, Zalevsky Z, García J, Ferreira C and Micó V 2016 Spatially multiplexed interferometric microscopy with partially coherent illumination J. Biomed. Opt. 21 106007

    2016

  74. [81]

    Picazo-Bueno J Á, Trusiak M, García J, Patorski K and Micó V 2018 Hilbert–Huang single-shot spatially multiplexed interferometric microscopy Opt. Lett. 43 1007

    2018

  75. [82]

    Express 27 5655

    Picazo-Bueno J A, Trusiak M and Micó V 2019 Single- shot slightly off-axis digital holographic microscopy with add-on module based on beamsplitter cube Opt. Express 27 5655

    2019

  76. [83]

    Trusiak M, Picazo-Bueno J-A, Patorski K, Zdańkowski P and Mico V 2019 Single-shot two-frame π-shifted spatially multiplexed interference phase microscopy J. Biomed. Opt. 24 1

    2019

  77. [85]

    Dubois F, Requena M L N, Minetti C, Monnom O and Istasse E 2004 Partial spatial coherence effects in digital holographic microscopy with a laser source Appl. Opt. 43 1131–9

    2004

  78. [86]

    Dubois F, Callens N, Yourassowsky C, Hoyos M, Kurowski P and Monnom O 2006 Digital holographic microscopy with reduced spatial coherence for three- dimensional particle flow analysis Appl. Opt. 45 864–71

    2006

  79. [87]

    Remmersmann C, Stürwald S, Kemper B, Langehanenberg P and Von Bally G 2009 Phase noise optimization in temporal phase-shifting digital holography with partial coherence light sources and its application in quantitative cell imaging Appl. Opt. 48 1463–72

    2009

  80. [88]

    Express 18 21990

    Kolman P and Chmelík R 2010 Coherence-controlled holographic microscope Opt. Express 18 21990

    2010

  81. [89]

    Dubois F and Yourassowsky C 2012 Full off-axis red- green-blue digital holographic microscope with LED illumination Opt. Lett. 37 2190

    2012

  82. [90]

    Express 21 14747

    Slabý T, Kolman P, Dostál Z, Antoš M, Lošťák M and Chmelík R 2013 Off-axis setup taking full advantage of incoherent illumination in coherence-controlled holographic microscope Opt. Express 21 14747

    2013

  83. [91]

    Born M and Wolf E 1999 Principles of Optics 7th edition

    1999

  84. [92]

    Trusiak M, Mico V, Garcia J and Patorski K 2016 Quantitative phase imaging by single-shot Hilbert–Huang phase microscopy Opt. Lett. 41 4344

    2016

  85. [93]

    Huang N E, Shen Z, Long S R, Wu M C, Snin H H, Zheng Q, Yen N C, Tung C C and Liu H H 1998 The empirical mode decomposition and the Hubert spectrum for nonlinear and non-stationary time series analysis Proc. R. Soc. A Math. Phys. Eng. Sci. 454 903–95

    1998

  86. [94]

    Ikeda T, Popescu G, Dasari R R and Feld M S 2005 Hilbert phase microscopy for investigating fast dynamics in transparent systems Opt. Lett. 30 1165

    2005

  87. [95]

    Popescu G, Ikeda T, Best C A, Badizadegan K, Dasari R R and Feld M S 2005 Erythrocyte structure and dynamics quantified by Hilbert phase microscopy J. Biomed. Opt. 10 13 060503

    2005

  88. [96]

    Express 20 23463

    Trusiak M, Patorski K and Wielgus M 2012 Adaptive enhancement of optical fringe patterns by selective reconstruction using FABEMD algorithm and Hilbert spiral transform Opt. Express 20 23463

    2012

  89. [97]

    Lasers Eng

    Trusiak M, Wielgus M and Patorski K 2014 Advanced processing of optical fringe patterns by automated selective reconstruction and enhanced fast empirical mode decomposition Opt. Lasers Eng. 52 230–40

    2014

  90. [98]

    Express 24 4221

    Trusiak M, Służewski Ł and Patorski K 2016 Single shot fringe pattern phase demodulation using Hilbert-Huang transform aided by the principal component analysis Opt. Express 24 4221

    2016

  91. [99]

    Martinez-Carranza J, Falaggis K and Kozacki T 2017 Fast and accurate phase-unwrapping algorithm based on the transport of intensity equation Appl. Opt. 56 7079

    2017

  92. [100]

    Herráez M A, Burton D R, Lalor M J and Gdeisat M A 2002 Fast two-dimensional phase-unwrapping algorithm based on sorting by reliability following a noncontinuous path Appl. Opt. 41 7437

    2002

  93. [101]

    Mangeol P and Peterman E J G 2016 High-resolution real- time dual-view imaging with multiple point of view microscopy Biomed. Opt. Express 7 3631

    2016

  94. [102]

    Wu Y, Kumar A, Smith C, Ardiel E, Chandris P, Christensen R, Rey-Suarez I, Guo M, Vishwasrao H D, Chen J, Tang J, Upadhyaya A, La Riviere P J and Shroff H 2017 Reflective imaging improves spatiotemporal resolution and collection efficiency in light sheet microscopy Nat. Commun. 8 1–12

    2017

  95. [103]

    Bianco V, Mandracchia B, Marchesano V, Pagliarulo V, Olivieri F, Coppola S, Paturzo M and Ferraro P 2017 Endowing a plain fluidic chip with micro-optics: A holographic microscope slide Light Sci. Appl. 6 e17055– e17055

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.