Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 93 references

Metallicity Scatter Originating from Sub-kiloparsec Starbursting Clumps in the Core of a Protocluster at z=7.88

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Spatially resolved spectroscopy of a z=7.88 merging system reveals about a tenfold range in oxygen abundance between its star-forming regions, with the metal-poor ones hidden in integrated light.

desk verdict A valuable IFU dataset that delivers the first direct-T metallicity in a z=7.9 sub-kpc clump, but the strong-line error bars are too small and the branch degeneracy for the lowest-metallicity point is not fully addressed. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.11879 v1 pith:YUN4XLSJ submitted 2025-01-21 astro-ph.GA

Takahiro Morishita , Massimo Stiavelli , Eros Vanzella , Pietro Bergamini , Kristan Boyett , Marco Chiaberge , Claudio Grillo , Nicha Leethochawalit
show 4 more authors
Matteo Messa Guido Roberts-Borsani Piero Rosati Anowar Shajib
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords metallicityscatterJWSTNIRSpecIFUhigh-redshiftgalaxiesprotoclusterA2744-z7p9directelectrontemperaturestarburstingclumpsmass-metallicityrelationintegratedlightbias
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses JWST NIRSpec integral-field spectroscopy to map the [OIII] emission in a merging galaxy system at z=7.88, part of the protocluster A2744-z7p9. It finds that oxygen abundance varies by roughly 1 dex among the detected star-forming regions, from below log(O/H)+12=7 to about 8, with one region (ZD12-W) measured directly via the auroral [OIII]4363 line at 7.41. The integrated spectra of the whole system sit at the enriched end, because more massive, more luminous regions outshine less enriched ones. The paper argues that this bias means slit-based spectroscopy (NIRSpec MSA) can miss metal-poor or metal-free star formation in the early universe. The scatter is attributed to fast chemical cycling in compact, intensely star-forming clumps seen in NIRCam imaging.

What carries the argument

The analysis is carried by the [OIII]5007 emission-line map extracted from the NIRSpec IFU cube, which defines five regions (ZD3, ZD6, ZD6-E, ZD12-W, ZD12-E); the auroral [OIII]4363 detection in ZD12-W enables a direct electron-temperature metallicity, while R3 and R23 strong-line calibrations cover the rest. The load-bearing mechanism is luminosity weighting: because more massive regions outshine less enriched ones, the integrated spectrum is dominated by the enriched components, which is the effect the paper identifies as biasing MSA slit measurements.

What would settle it

Measure Balmer decrements (H-gamma/H-beta or, with longer-wavelength coverage, H-alpha/H-beta) for each of the five [OIII] regions in this system. If dust-corrected fluxes yield metallicities within ~0.3 dex of each other across ZD3, ZD6, ZD12-W, and ZD12-E, the claimed ~1 dex internal scatter would disappear; conversely, confirming the decrements would verify the dust-correction step.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the ~1 dex metallicity scatter previously inferred for high-redshift galaxies is physically real and spatially resolved in this system: separate [OIII]-emitting regions within one z=7.88 merging galaxy differ by about an order of magnitude in oxygen abundance. A direct electron-temperature measurement in ZD12-W gives log(O/H)+12=7.41, while strong-line calibrations put ZD6 near 8 and ZD12-E below 7. The integrated (aperture) spectra trace the more enriched components, confirming that luminosity-weighted measurements are biased against low-metallicity star formation. The paper connects this scatter to four unresolved UV-bright clumps with star-formation surface densities above 30 solar masses per year per $kpc^{2}$, which provide an environment for rapid enrichment and dilution cycles.

Load-bearing premise

The metallicities of all but one region rely on dust-correcting [OIII] and Hbeta fluxes with an SED-based extinction rescaled by a fixed factor, and on the R3/R23 strong-line calibration being valid for these dense, high-redshift clumps; if either is off by ~0.3 dex, part of the claimed ~1 dex scatter would shrink, though the direct-T measurement of ZD12-W anchors the low-metallicity end.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Slit-based NIRSpec MSA metallicity measurements of early galaxies are systematically biased toward enriched regions, so reported metallicities may overestimate the true ISM abundance.
  • The unresolved, intensely star-forming clumps in ZD12 are plausible sites of rapid metal enrichment and may be the environments where metal-poor star formation survives.
  • Merger-driven assembly, not smooth accretion, can produce large internal metallicity variations in early galaxies, adding to the scatter around the mass-metallicity relation.
  • The direct-T metallicity at z=7.88 in ZD12-W provides a benchmark for calibrating strong-line methods in the early universe.
  • Updated protocluster properties (overdensity delta=44, total halo mass ~5.8e11 Msun, velocity dispersion 1100 km/s) place A2744-z7p9 among the densest structures known at z~8.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If luminosity weighting is as strong as this system suggests, current JWST surveys that place MSA slits on galaxy photocenters may systematically miss the most pristine, lowest-metallicity star formation, and the true high-redshift mass-metallicity relation could be shallower than reported.
  • The same bias should apply to other element abundance ratios (e.g., N/O) measured from integrated light; spatially resolved IFU follow-up of lensed systems could test whether N-enriched and O-poor regions are mixed.
  • A testable prediction is that higher-resolution IFU observations of other z>7 merging systems will find similar 0.5-1 dex internal scatter, concentrated in compact clumps with high surface star-formation density.
  • The unresolved clumps in ZD12 could be young massive clusters or proto-globular clusters; deep spectroscopy of nitrogen and argon lines would distinguish these and connect the scatter to cluster formation.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. This paper presents JWST/NIRSpec IFU G395H/F290LP observations of the merging galaxy system A2744-z7p9 at z=7.88. The authors identify five [O III]5007-emitting regions, including the newly confirmed galaxy ZD12, and detect the auroral [O III]4363 line in one region (ZD12-W), from which they derive a direct electron-temperature oxygen abundance of 12+log(O/H)=7.41+0.19-0.17. For the remaining regions they use the R3 and R23 strong-line calibrations of Sanders et al. (2024), reporting a ~1 dex metallicity spread, with ZD6 at 12+log(O/H)=7.92 and ZD12-E at 6.91. They then argue that integrated spectra are biased toward the more enriched components, so that slit-based MSA observations can miss metal-poor star formation. In addition, NIRCam F150W imaging reveals 10 UV-bright clumps in ZD12, four of which are unresolved with high star-formation surface densities, and the paper updates the overdensity, halo mass, and velocity dispersion of the protocluster.

Significance. If the measured ~1 dex metallicity scatter is real, this is an important result: it would be one of the first spatially resolved demonstrations at z~8 that chemical enrichment varies on sub-kiloparsec scales, with a direct-T measurement anchoring the low-metallicity end. The paper combines a clean IFU detection, a credible direct-T analysis, and a careful clump decomposition, and it makes a concrete, falsifiable prediction about the biases of slit-based spectroscopy. The main caveat is that the headline scatter rests on strong-line metallicities whose branch assignment and error budget are not yet fully demonstrated; the direct-T anchor alone does not remove that caveat.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.2.2 and Table 2] The reported strong-line metallicities for ZD6 and ZD3+ZD6 carry uncertainties of ±0.01 dex, which is not consistent with the line-flux errors in Table 1. For ZD6, Hβ is measured at 22.8 ± 7.7 (34% error) and [O III]5007 at 382.8 ± 32.6 (8.5% error); propagating these in quadrature for the R3 index gives a random error of ~0.15 dex in log(O/H), not 0.01 dex. The quoted value therefore appears to omit the dominant random errors and any covariance between the line fluxes. Since ZD6 defines the high-metallicity end of the claimed ~1 dex scatter, the error budget for these values must be presented transparently; as written, the table overstates the precision of the strongest constraint on the scatter.
  2. [Sec. 3.2.2] The paper does not break the known double-valued degeneracy of R3 and R23 for ZD6 and ZD12-E. ZD12-E has R3 = log(26.1/6.9) ≈ 0.578, which can be reproduced either on the low-metallicity branch (12+log(O/H)=6.91, as quoted) or on the high-metallicity branch near 12+log(O/H)~8 where R3 turns over. Agreement between R3 and R23 does not resolve this degeneracy because both indices share the same branch structure and are drawn from the same calibration library. The direct-T measurement for ZD12-W (Sec. 3.2.1) anchors the R3–Z relation at one point only, not at the extremes represented by ZD6 and ZD12-E. The authors should demonstrate the branch choice, for example using [O II]/[O III] ratios or a photoionization model grid, or at minimum quote the high-branch alternative. Without this, the ~1 dex scatter in Fig. 4 could be a calibration artifact rather than an astrophysical result.
  3. [Sec. 3.1] The dust correction for the emission lines rests on rescaling SED-derived A_V by a fixed factor of 2.27 from Calzetti et al. (2000), with no Balmer-decrement verification except in ZD12-W. This is an external assumption applied to all five regions, and the paper does not report how the metallicities, especially the direct-T value in ZD12-W, change if the factor is varied or if no dust correction is applied. The auroral-to-Balmer ratio [O III]4363/Hβ used for ZD12-W spans a wider wavelength baseline than R3, so the direct-T anchor is not immune to this assumption. A short sensitivity test (e.g., adopting A_V directly, or halving/doubling the 2.27 factor) should be added so the reader can judge whether the ~1 dex scatter and the absolute metallicity scale are robust.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 4] The direct-T value for ZD12-W is discussed in the text but does not appear to be shown in Fig. 4; adding it with its asymmetric error bars would help the reader judge the consistency of the strong-line scale.
  2. [Sec. 4.1] The sentence describing the redshift evolution of the scatter ('from ~0.1 at z~0 ... to ~0.2 at ~0.2 dex at 3<z<5 and ~0.3 dex at z>5') is awkwardly phrased and should be rewritten for clarity.
  3. [Table 2] The footnote for ZD12-W gives the direct-T metallicity, but the table itself lists R3 and R23 values for the same region; a column header or note clarifying which values are used in Fig. 4 would avoid confusion.
  4. [Sec. 3.2.1] The phrase 'estimate the O+ temperature from the O++ temperature to 1.5e4 K' should read '... to be 1.5e4 K' for grammatical clarity.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the metallicity scatter is derived from external calibrations and a direct-T measurement, and the outshining interpretation is a flux-weighted consequence of independent line fluxes, not a fitted prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim, a ~1 dex metallicity scatter among sub-kiloparsec regions at z=7.88, is not manufactured from the paper's own inputs. The direct-T abundance for ZD12-W follows from the detected [OIII]4363 auroral line, with Te and ne solved via standard Izotov/Osterbrock relations and the density dependence checked against ne=1 and 10000 cm^-3. The other metallicities use the R3 and R23 strong-line calibrations of Sanders et al. (2024), an externally published calibration built on z=2-9 direct-T galaxies, with the paper explicitly noting that an independent Chakraborty et al. (2024) calibration gives similar values within ~0.1 dex. No parameter is fitted to the target scatter and then renamed a prediction. The statement that integrated spectra are 'more represented by enriched components' is an inference from the measured line fluxes: the integrated ZD3+ZD6 system has log(O/H)+12~7.9, ZD3 alone is ~7.3, and ZD6 alone is ~7.9, so the integrated value naturally tracks the brighter, more enriched region. This is a weighted-sum consequence of the observations, not a self-consistent fit. The paper does use self-citations (Morishita et al. 2024d for the dust-rescaling validation and for the z>5 mass-metallicity reference, and the gsf SED code), but these are contextual tools and comparisons rather than load-bearing steps in deriving the metallicity scatter; no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported from the authors' prior work. The dual-branch R3/R23 degeneracy raised by a skeptical reader is a legitimate external-calibration systematic, not a circular reduction: it concerns whether the external calibrations are accurate at the extremes, not whether the paper's result is equivalent to its inputs. The conclusion is therefore self-contained against external benchmarks, with only minor contextual self-citations, so no circularity is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central metallicity measurement rests on standard atomic physics, external strong-line calibrations, and an unverified dust-correction factor applied because Balmer decrements are unavailable. The clump interpretation depends on SED fitting and galfit decomposition. No new physical entities are postulated.

free parameters (3)
  • Per-region dust attenuation A_V from SED fitting = Not tabulated; derived with gsf from photometry
    Used to correct the [OIII]/H-beta and other line fluxes after rescaling by a factor of 2.27; no Balmer decrement is available for most regions, so A_V strongly affects all strong-line metallicities.
  • Per-clump stellar masses and mass-to-light ratios from SED fitting and galfit = log M*/M_sun ~ 7.6 to 8.9 for UV clumps
    These determine the clump masses and surface densities that support the interpretation of compact starbursting clumps as enrichment sites.
  • galfit Sersic parameters (half-light radius and index) for the 10 UV clumps = Four clumps unresolved with Re upper limits; n=0.5-4.0 for resolved clumps
    Used to classify the clumps as unresolved (<100 pc) and to compute star formation and stellar mass surface densities.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The electron temperature and abundance relations of Izotov et al. (2006) and Osterbrock (1989) apply to the z=7.88 gas.
    The direct-T metallicity of ZD12-W is derived from these standard nebular relations; any breakdown at extreme high density or high temperature would shift the result.
  • domain assumption The Sanders et al. (2024) R3 and R23 strong-line calibrations, built from z=2-9 direct-T galaxies, are valid for the five [OIII] regions here.
    All metallicities except ZD12-W rely on these calibrations; the paper checks only one alternative calibration and does not quantify the full systematic spread.
  • ad hoc to paper The Calzetti et al. (2000) factor of 2.27, applied to SED-derived A_V, accurately corrects emission-line fluxes.
    Adopted because no Balmer decrement is confidently available for most regions (Section 3.1); this unverified correction directly enters the line ratios used for metallicity.
  • domain assumption The lens model of Bergamini et al. (2023a,b) accurately predicts magnification at these positions.
    Absolute sizes, masses, and star formation rates are corrected by the magnification factor; an incorrect lens model would affect the clump property comparisons.
  • domain assumption The five [OIII] regions are physically associated members of a merging system rather than chance projections along the line of sight.
    The paper notes all five regions fall within Delta-v = 1500 km/s and that ZD3 and ZD6 are separated by 350 km/s, which supports association but does not rule out projection effects.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Metallicity Scatter Originating from Sub-kiloparsec Starbursting Clumps in the Core of a Protocluster at z=7.88." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/YUN4XLSJ

@misc{pith2026250111879,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Metallicity Scatter Originating from Sub-kiloparsec Starbursting Clumps in the Core of a Protocluster at z=7.88},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/YUN4XLSJ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.11879}
}
abstract

We present new JWST NIRSpec integral field unit (IFU) G395H/F290LP observations of a merging galaxy system at $z=7.88$, part of A2744-z7p9, the most distant protocluster to date. The IFU cube reveals [OIII] emissions in two previously known galaxies (ZD3 and ZD6) and a newly identified galaxy, ZD12, at $z_{\rm spec}=7.8762$. One of the detected \oiii-emitting regions has a detection of the auroral [OIII]4363, line, allowing us to derive a direct metallicity of $\log$(O/H)$+12=7.4\pm0.2$, while metallicities in other regions are measured using strong line calibration methods. We find large deviations within the measured metallicity ($\Delta \log {\rm (O/H)}\sim1$), which suggests a fast chemical enrichment from intense star formation and merger-driven growth, as expected in early galaxies. Our analysis shows that metal-poor regions could easily be outshone by more enriched regions, posing a challenge for spectroscopic analysis based on integrated light (i.e., NIRSpec MSA) against identifying metal-free star formation in the early universe. NIRCam imaging reveals seven UV-bright clumps in ZD12, in the range of stellar mass $\log M_*/M_\odot\sim7.6$--8.9. Four of them are unresolved ($< 100$pc) and intensely star-forming ($>30 M_\odot {\rm yr^{-1} kpc^{-2}}$), likely contributing to the scatter in metallicity by producing an ideal environment for rapid chemical cycles. Lastly, we revisit the nature of the host protocluster by including new member galaxies identified here and in the literature, and obtain local overdensity factor $\delta=44_{-31}^{+89}$, total halo mass $M_{\rm h} = 5.8_{-0.3}^{+0.2}\times10^{11}\,M_\odot$, and a formal velocity dispersion of $1100\pm500$ km s$^{-1}$.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.11879 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. T op: Mosaic image of the field (blue: HST/ACS-F435W, green: NIRCam-F090W, red: NIRCam-F150W) centered on the protocluster, A2744-z7p9. The spectroscopically confirmed members are marked (circles). The Field-of-View of our IFU observations GTO4553 is shown (blue rectangles). Bottom: Postage stamps of NIRCam images (4′′ × 4 ′′), showing the region of the GTO4553 observations. Five [O iii]-emitting regions analyzed in… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Extracted G395H/F290LP spectra of the [O iii]-emitting regions (black lines). The defined regions for each spectrum are shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Electron density measurements of ZD12- W (cyan square), ZD6 (magenta pentagon), and the total (ZD3+ZD6+ZD12; white circle) shown along with those in the literature (gray dots; data compiled in Abdurro’uf et al. 2024). The evolution curves (∝ (1 + z) and ∝ (1 + z) 2 ) de￾rived in Isobe et al. (2023) are shown. but not exceptional among high-z galaxies studied with JWST (e.g., Isobe et al. 2023; Senchyna et al. 2023; … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Distribution of our sample in the stellar mass– metallicity plane. The mettallicities are measured using the R3 calibration presented by Sanders et al. (2024). Large symbols are for measurements over integrated regions and small symbols for individual [O iii]-emitting …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Two-dimensional light profile of the system in the NIRCam-F150W band, corresponding to ∼ 1700 ˚A rest-frame. #7 is a foreground galaxy at z ∼ 1.6. (Lef t): observed image. Individual components fitted with galfit are identified (circles). (M iddle): Modeled light profi…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Size-mass distributions of UV-bright clumps (red circles). Half-light radii Re are measured by two-dimensional profile fitting ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: (Lef t): Star formation surface density as a function of stellar mass. Symbols are the same as in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

93 extracted references · 4 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    L., Coe, D., et al

    Abdurro’uf, Larson, R. L., Coe, D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 973, 47, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad6001

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ad6001 2024

  2. [2]

    D., Vanzella, E., et al

    Adamo, A., Bradley, L. D., Vanzella, E., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2401.03224, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2401.03224 Metallicity Scatter in the Core of a Protocluster atz = 7.88 13

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2401.03224 2024

  3. [3]

    H., & Martini, P

    Andrews, B. H., & Martini, P. 2013, ApJ, 765, 140, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/765/2/140 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan...

    doi:10.1088/0004-637x/765/2/140 2013

  4. [4]

    C., Flynn, K., & Gebhardt, K

    Beers, T. C., Flynn, K., & Gebhardt, K. 1990, AJ, 100, 32, doi: 10.1086/115487

    doi:10.1086/115487 1990

  5. [5]

    2017, MNRAS, 469, 151, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx789

    Belfiore, F., Maiolino, R., Tremonti, C., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 469, 151, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stx789

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stx789 2017

  6. [6]

    2023a, A&A, 670, A60, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244575 —

    Bergamini, P., Acebron, A., Grillo, C., et al. 2023a, A&A, 670, A60, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202244575 —. 2023b, ApJ, 952, 84, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd643

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202244575

  7. [7]

    1996, A&AS, 117, 393

    Bertin, E., & Arnouts, S. 1996, A&AS, 117, 393

    1996

  8. [8]

    E., et al

    Bezanson, R., Labbe, I., Whitaker, K. E., et al. 2022, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2212.04026. https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.04026

    arXiv 2022

Show all 93 references
  1. [9]

    J., Oesch, P

    Bouwens, R. J., Oesch, P. A., Stefanon, M., et al. 2021, AJ, 162, 47, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/abf83e

    2021 doi

  2. [10]

    2024, Nature Astronomy, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02218-7

    Boyett, K., Trenti, M., Leethochawalit, N., et al. 2024, Nature Astronomy, doi: 10.1038/s41550-024-02218-7

    2024 doi

  3. [11]

    2023, larrybradley/lacosmic: 1.1.0, 1.1.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10145563

    Bradley, L. 2023, larrybradley/lacosmic: 1.1.0, 1.1.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10145563

    2023 doi

  4. [12]

    2023, JWST Calibration Pipeline, 1.10.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7795697

    Bushouse, H., Eisenhamer, J., Dencheva, N., et al. 2023, JWST Calibration Pipeline, 1.10.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.7795697

    2023 doi

  5. [13]

    C., et al

    Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682, doi: 10.1086/308692

    2000 doi

  6. [14]

    2003, MNRAS, 342, 345, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06541.x

    Cappellari, M., & Copin, Y. 2003, MNRAS, 342, 345, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06541.x

    2003

  7. [15]

    2003, PASP, 115, 763, doi: 10.1086/376392

    Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115, 763, doi: 10.1086/376392

    2003 doi

  8. [16]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.15435, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.15435

    Chakraborty, P., Sarkar, A., Smith, R., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.15435, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.15435

    2024 doi

  9. [17]

    2024, ApJL, 976, L15, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad8dc910.1134/ S1063772908080040

    Chemerynska, I., Atek, H., Dayal, P., et al. 2024, ApJL, 976, L15, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad8dc910.1134/ S1063772908080040

    2024 doi

  10. [18]

    2022, Transient Name Server AstroNote, 166, 1

    Chen, W., Kelly, P., Morishita, T., et al. 2022, Transient Name Server AstroNote, 166, 1

    2022

  11. [19]

    P., Mason, C., et al

    Chen, Z., Stark, D. P., Mason, C., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 528, 7052, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae455

    2024 doi

  12. [20]

    2018, MNRAS, 481, 1690, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2380

    Chisholm, J., Tremonti, C., & Leitherer, C. 2018, MNRAS, 481, 1690, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty2380

    2018 doi

  13. [21]

    2020, MNRAS, 491, 944, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2910

    Curti, M., Mannucci, F., Cresci, G., & Maiolino, R. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 944, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2910

    2020 doi

  14. [22]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2304.08516, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2304.08516

    Curti, M., Maiolino, R., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2304.08516, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2304.08516

    2023 doi arXiv

  15. [23]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.11428, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2403.11428

    Dalmasso, N., Calabr` o, A., Leethochawalit, N., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.11428, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2403.11428

    2024 doi

  16. [24]

    2008, MNRAS, 386, 577, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13075.x

    Fakhouri, O., & Ma, C.-P. 2008, MNRAS, 386, 577, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13075.x

    2008

  17. [25]

    2014, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.12157

    Foreman-Mackey, D., Sick, J., & Johnson, B. 2014, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.12157

    2014 doi

  18. [26]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2402.18543, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2402.18543

    Fujimoto, S., Ouchi, M., Kohno, K., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2402.18543, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2402.18543

    2024 doi arXiv

  19. [27]

    E., et al

    Fukugita, M., Ichikawa, T., Gunn, J. E., et al. 1996, AJ, 111, 1748, doi: 10.1086/117915

    1996 doi

  20. [28]

    Gallazzi, A., Charlot, S., Brinchmann, J., White, S. D. M., & Tremonti, C. A. 2005, MNRAS, 362, 41, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09321.x

    2005

  21. [29]

    D., Clayton, G

    Gordon, K. D., Clayton, G. C., Misselt, K. A., Landolt, A. U., & Wolff, M. J. 2003, ApJ, 594, 279, doi: 10.1086/376774

    2003 doi

  22. [30]

    R., Millman, K

    Harris, C. R., Millman, K. J., van der Walt, S. J., et al. 2020, Nature, 585, 357, doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2

    2020 doi

  23. [31]

    2023, ApJL, 955, L2, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acf57c

    Hashimoto, T., ´Alvarez-M´ arquez, J., Fudamoto, Y., et al. 2023, ApJL, 955, L2, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acf57c

    2023 doi

  24. [32]

    E., Brammer, G

    Heintz, K. E., Brammer, G. B., Gim´ enez-Arteaga, C., et al. 2023, Nature Astronomy, 7, 1517, doi: 10.1038/s41550-023-02078-7

    2023 doi

  25. [33]

    Y.-Y., Coe, D., Abdurro’uf, et al

    Hsiao, T. Y.-Y., Coe, D., Abdurro’uf, et al. 2023, ApJL, 949, L34, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acc94b

    2023 doi

  26. [34]

    2016, ApJ, 822, 5, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/822/1/5

    Ishigaki, M., Ouchi, M., & Harikane, Y. 2016, ApJ, 822, 5, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/822/1/5

    2016 doi

  27. [35]

    2023, ApJ, 956, 139, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acf376

    Isobe, Y., Ouchi, M., Nakajima, K., et al. 2023, ApJ, 956, 139, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acf376

    2023 doi

  28. [36]

    Thuan, T. X. 2006, A&A, 448, 955, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053763

    2006 doi

  29. [37]

    C., Bowler, R., Bunker, A

    Jones, G. C., Bowler, R., Bunker, A. J., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.15027, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.15027

    2024 doi

  30. [38]

    L., Diego, J

    Kelly, P. L., Diego, J. M., Rodney, S., et al. 2018, Nature Astronomy, 2, 334, doi: 10.1038/s41550-018-0430-3

    2018 doi

  31. [39]

    1998, ApJ, 498, 541, doi: 10.1086/305588

    Kennicutt, Robert C., J. 1998, ApJ, 498, 541, doi: 10.1086/305588

    1998 doi

  32. [40]

    N., Cohen, J

    Kirby, E. N., Cohen, J. G., Guhathakurta, P., et al. 2013, ApJ, 779, 102, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/779/2/102

    2013 doi

  33. [41]

    2014, A&A, 562, L8, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323179

    Laporte, N., Streblyanska, A., Clement, B., et al. 2014, A&A, 562, L8, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323179

    2014 doi

  34. [42]

    H., Maseda, M

    Laseter, I. H., Maseda, M. V., Curti, M., et al. 2024, A&A, 681, A70, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347133 14 Morishita, Stiavelli, et al

    2024 doi

  35. [43]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.08382, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.08382

    Li, S., Wang, X., Chen, Y., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.08382, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.08382

    2024 doi arXiv

  36. [44]

    M., Koekemoer, A., Coe, D., et al

    Lotz, J. M., Koekemoer, A., Coe, D., et al. 2017, ApJ, 837, 97, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/837/1/97

    2017 doi

  37. [45]

    F., Faucher-Gigu` ere, C.-A., et al

    Ma, X., Hopkins, P. F., Faucher-Gigu` ere, C.-A., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 456, 2140, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv2659

    2016 doi

  38. [46]

    2010, MNRAS, 408, 2115, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17291.x

    Gnerucci, A. 2010, MNRAS, 408, 2115, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17291.x

    2010

  39. [47]

    2024a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.08627, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.08627 —

    Marconcini, C., D’Eugenio, F., Maiolino, R., et al. 2024a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.08627, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.08627 —. 2024b, MNRAS, 533, 2488, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1971

    doi arXiv

  40. [48]

    A., Trenti, M., & Treu, T

    Mason, C. A., Trenti, M., & Treu, T. 2023, MNRAS, 521, 497, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad035

    2023 doi

  41. [49]

    2022, ApJL, 938, L14, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac8f93

    Merlin, E., Bonchi, A., Paris, D., et al. 2022, ApJL, 938, L14, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac8f93

    2022 doi

  42. [50]

    2024a, MNRAS, 529, 2162, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae565

    Messa, M., Dessauges-Zavadsky, M., Adamo, A., Richard, J., & Claeyssens, A. 2024a, MNRAS, 529, 2162, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae565

    doi

  43. [51]

    2024b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.20331, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2407.20331 Meˇ stri´ c, U., Vanzella, E., Zanella, A., et al

    Messa, M., Vanzella, E., Loiacono, F., et al. 2024b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.20331, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2407.20331 Meˇ stri´ c, U., Vanzella, E., Zanella, A., et al. 2022, MNRAS, 516, 3532, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac2309

    2022 doi arXiv

  44. [52]

    Mirocha, J., & Furlanetto, S. R. 2023, MNRAS, 519, 843, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stac3578

    2023 doi

  45. [53]

    2023, ApJL, 946, L35, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acbf50

    Morishita, T., & Stiavelli, M. 2023, ApJL, 946, L35, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acbf50

    2023 doi

  46. [54]

    E., Treu, T., et al

    Morishita, T., Abramson, L. E., Treu, T., et al. 2019, ApJ, 877, 141, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1d53

    2019 doi

  47. [55]

    2023, ApJL, 947, L24, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acb99e

    Morishita, T., Roberts-Borsani, G., Treu, T., et al. 2023, ApJL, 947, L24, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acb99e

    2023 doi

  48. [56]

    2024a, ApJ, 963, 9, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1404

    Morishita, T., Stiavelli, M., Chary, R.-R., et al. 2024a, ApJ, 963, 9, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1404

    doi

  49. [57]

    A., Kreilgaard, K

    Morishita, T., Mason, C. A., Kreilgaard, K. C., et al. 2024b, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.04211, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.04211

    doi arXiv

  50. [58]

    2024c, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2408.10980, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2408.10980

    Morishita, T., Liu, Z., Stiavelli, M., et al. 2024c, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2408.10980, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2408.10980

    doi arXiv

  51. [59]

    2024d, ApJ, 971, 43, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5290 Mu˜ noz, J

    Morishita, T., Stiavelli, M., Grillo, C., et al. 2024d, ApJ, 971, 43, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5290 Mu˜ noz, J. B., Mirocha, J., Chisholm, J., Furlanetto, S. R., & Mason, C. 2024, MNRAS, 535, L37, doi: 10.1093/mnrasl/slae086

    2024 doi

  52. [60]

    P., Matthee, J., Kramarenko, I., et al

    Naidu, R. P., Matthee, J., Kramarenko, I., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.01874, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2410.01874

    2024 doi arXiv

  53. [61]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2301.12825, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2301.12825

    Nakajima, K., Ouchi, M., Isobe, Y., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2301.12825, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2301.12825

    2023 doi arXiv

  54. [62]

    2024, ApJ, 975, 238, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7d0b

    Nakazato, Y., Ceverino, D., & Yoshida, N. 2024, ApJ, 975, 238, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad7d0b

    2024 doi

  55. [63]

    A., Kannappan, S

    Norris, M. A., Kannappan, S. J., Forbes, D. A., et al. 2014, MNRAS, 443, 1151, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stu1186

    2014 doi

  56. [64]

    B., & Gunn, J

    Oke, J. B., & Gunn, J. E. 1983, ApJ, 266, 713, doi: 10.1086/160817

    1983 doi

  57. [65]

    D., & Dav´ e, R

    Oppenheimer, B. D., & Dav´ e, R. 2006, MNRAS, 373, 1265, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10989.x

    2006

  58. [66]

    Osterbrock, D. E. 1989, Astrophysics of gaseous nebulae and active galactic nuclei

    1989

  59. [67]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2408.00061, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2408.00061

    Pallottini, A., Ferrara, A., Gallerani, S., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2408.00061, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2408.00061

    2024 doi arXiv

  60. [68]

    Y., Ho, L

    Peng, C. Y., Ho, L. C., Impey, C. D., & Rix, H.-W. 2002, AJ, 124, 266, doi: 10.1086/340952 —. 2010, AJ, 139, 2097, doi: 10.1088/0004-6256/139/6/2097

    2002 doi

  61. [69]

    2012, ApJS, 199, 25, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/199/2/25

    Postman, M., Coe, D., Ben ´ ıtez, N., et al. 2012, ApJS, 199, 25, doi: 10.1088/0067-0049/199/2/25

    2012 doi

  62. [70]

    A., et al

    Prieto-Lyon, G., Strait, V., Mason, C. A., et al. 2023, A&A, 672, A186, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245532

    2023 doi

  63. [71]

    R., Vieira, J

    Rigby, J. R., Vieira, J. D., Phadke, K. A., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2312.10465, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2312.10465

    2023 doi arXiv

  64. [72]

    2022, ApJL, 938, L13, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac8e6e

    Roberts-Borsani, G., Morishita, T., Treu, T., et al. 2022, ApJL, 938, L13, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac8e6e

    2022 doi

  65. [73]

    2015, MNRAS, 449, 49, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv264

    Rodriguez-Gomez, V., Genel, S., Vogelsberger, M., et al. 2015, MNRAS, 449, 49, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv264

    2015 doi

  66. [74]

    L., Shapley, A

    Sanders, R. L., Shapley, A. E., Topping, M. W., Reddy, N. A., & Brammer, G. B. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2303.08149, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2303.08149 —. 2024, ApJ, 962, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad15fc

    2023 doi arXiv

  67. [75]

    I., Verhamme, A., et al

    Schaerer, D., Izotov, Y. I., Verhamme, A., et al. 2016, A&A, 591, L8, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201628943

    2016 doi

  68. [76]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.07695, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.07695

    Scholtz, J., Curti, M., D’Eugenio, F., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.07695, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2411.07695

    2024 doi arXiv

  69. [77]

    P., & Rudie, G

    Senchyna, P., Plat, A., Stark, D. P., & Rudie, G. C. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2303.04179, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2303.04179

    2023 doi arXiv

  70. [78]

    2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2304.06742, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2304.06742

    Shen, X., Borrow, J., Vogelsberger, M., et al. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2304.06742, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2304.06742

    2023 doi arXiv

  71. [79]

    J., Labb´ e, I., et al

    Smit, R., Bouwens, R. J., Labb´ e, I., et al. 2016, ApJ, 833, 254, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/833/2/254

    2016 doi

  72. [80]

    L., Jauzac, M., Acebron, A., et al

    Steinhardt, C. L., Jauzac, M., Acebron, A., et al. 2020, ApJS, 247, 64, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab75ed Metallicity Scatter in the Core of a Protocluster atz = 7.88 15

    2020 doi

  73. [81]

    2023, ApJL, 957, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0159 —

    Stiavelli, M., Morishita, T., Chiaberge, M., et al. 2023, ApJL, 957, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0159 —. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.06517, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.06517

    2023 doi arXiv

  74. [82]

    A., Weaver, J

    Suess, K. A., Weaver, J. R., Price, S. H., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.13132, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.13132

    2024 doi arXiv

  75. [83]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.17133, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2403.17133

    Sugahara, Y., ´Alvarez-M´ arquez, J., Hashimoto, T., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.17133, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2403.17133

    2024 doi arXiv

  76. [84]

    2024, ApJ, 970, 14, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad499a

    Yajima, H. 2024, ApJ, 970, 14, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad499a

    2024 doi

  77. [85]

    W., Stark, D

    Topping, M. W., Stark, D. P., Senchyna, P., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 529, 3301, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae682

    2024 doi

  78. [86]

    A., Heckman, T

    Tremonti, C. A., Heckman, T. M., Kauffmann, G., et al. 2004, ApJ, 613, 898, doi: 10.1086/423264

    2004 doi

  79. [87]

    2022, ApJ, 935, 110, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8158

    Treu, T., Roberts-Borsani, G., Bradac, M., et al. 2022, ApJ, 935, 110, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8158

    2022 doi

  80. [88]

    S., & Werk, J

    Tumlinson, J., Peeples, M. S., & Werk, J. K. 2017, ARA&A, 55, 389, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055240 van Dokkum, P. G. 2001, PASP, 113, 1420, doi: 10.1086/323894

    2017 doi

  81. [89]

    2022, ApJL, 940, L53, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac8c2d

    Vanzella, E., Castellano, M., Bergamini, P., et al. 2022, ApJL, 940, L53, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ac8c2d

    2022 doi

  82. [90]

    2023a, ApJ, 945, 53, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acb59a

    Vanzella, E., Claeyssens, A., Welch, B., et al. 2023a, ApJ, 945, 53, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acb59a

    doi

  83. [91]

    2023b, A&A, 678, A173, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346981

    Vanzella, E., Loiacono, F., Bergamini, P., et al. 2023b, A&A, 678, A173, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346981

    doi

  84. [92]

    2024, A&A, 691, A251, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451696

    Vanzella, E., Loiacono, F., Messa, M., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A251, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451696

    2024 doi

  85. [93]

    2014, ApJ, 795, 93, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/795/1/93

    Zheng, W., Shu, X., Moustakas, J., et al. 2014, ApJ, 795, 93, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/795/1/93

    2014 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.