Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 cited by

PINNsAgent: Automated PDE Surrogation with Large Language Models

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2501.12053 v1 pith:NOGM7NMW submitted 2025-01-21 cs.CE

classification cs.CE
keywords pinnspdespinnsagentknowledgesurrogationdeepdomain-specificlanguage
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Solving partial differential equations (PDEs) using neural methods has been a long-standing scientific and engineering research pursuit. Physics-Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) have emerged as a promising alternative to traditional numerical methods for solving PDEs. However, the gap between domain-specific knowledge and deep learning expertise often limits the practical application of PINNs. Previous works typically involve manually conducting extensive PINNs experiments and summarizing heuristic rules for hyperparameter tuning. In this work, we introduce PINNsAgent, a novel surrogation framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) and utilizes PINNs as a foundation to bridge the gap between domain-specific knowledge and deep learning. Specifically, PINNsAgent integrates (1) Physics-Guided Knowledge Replay (PGKR), which encodes the essential characteristics of PDEs and their associated best-performing PINNs configurations into a structured format, enabling efficient knowledge transfer from solved PDEs to similar problems and (2) Memory Tree Reasoning, a strategy that effectively explores the search space for optimal PINNs architectures. By leveraging LLMs and exploration strategies, PINNsAgent enhances the automation and efficiency of PINNs-based solutions. We evaluate PINNsAgent on 14 benchmark PDEs, demonstrating its effectiveness in automating the surrogation process and significantly improving the accuracy of PINNs-based solutions.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 4 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Reinforcement Learning with Verifiable Physics: Post-training LLMs with Continuous Rewards

    cs.LG 2026-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

    RLVP post-trains one LLM across eight PDE families with hybrid validity-plus-continuous physics rewards, improving solver accuracy and enabling selective compositional transfer to held-out PDEs.

  2. EvoPINN: Agentic Discovery of Executable Algorithms for Physics-Informed Neural Networks

    cs.AI 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    An LLM-guided, execution-verified evolutionary search discovered PINN training algorithms that beat the seed network on four PDE benchmarks and matched expert-designed baselines on three.

  3. ATHENA: Agentic Team for Hierarchical Evolutionary Numerical Algorithms

    cs.LG 2025-12 unverdicted novelty 5.0 of 10

    ATHENA introduces an agentic team framework that autonomously manages the end-to-end computational research lifecycle via a knowledge-driven HENA loop to achieve validation errors of 10^{-14} in scientific computing a...

  4. Large language models for partial differential equation workflows

    cs.AI 2026-08 conditional novelty 2.0 of 10

    A review organizing LLM-assisted PDE research into Discovery, Solving, and Optimization stages, arguing LLMs are most useful as workflow-level interfaces rather than isolated solvers.

Pith tools