Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Buckling and post-buckling of cylindrical shells under combined torsional and axial loads

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper establishes that the classical Donnell-Galerkin framework predicts buckling and post-buckling of clamped thin cylindrical shells under combined torsion and axial loads, including the switch from diagonal to twisted-diamond…

desk verdict Critical-load mapping of combined torsional/axial buckling is solid and new, but the Galerkin ansatz misses the twisted-diamond post-buckling branch, so the abstract overclaims. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.12475 v2 pith:B5KO5IEP submitted 2025-01-21 nlin.PS

Lu Lu , Sophie Leanza , Yang Liu , Ruike Renee Zhao This is my paper · ORCID
classification nlin.PS MSC 74G6074K2574H55
keywords shellbucklingcylindricalshellscombinedtorsionandaxialloadDonnelltheoryGalerkinmethodpost-bucklingequilibriumpathpatterntransitionclamped-clampedboundaryconditions
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether the classical Donnell-Galerkin framework, long used for pure compression or pure torsion, can also predict what happens when a thin cylindrical shell is loaded by both at once. It argues that the answer is yes: the model yields the critical buckling load, the critical circumferential wavenumber, the buckling pattern, and the post-buckling equilibrium path for clamped-clamped shells under compression-with-pre-torsion, torsion-with-pre-tension, and torsion-with-pre-compression. The predictions agree with finite element simulations and qualitatively reproduce experiments in which shells switch from diagonal to twisted-diamond patterns as pre-compression grows. The payoff is a predictive picture of how torsion-compression/tension coupling changes shell stability, which the authors connect to designing shell-inspired foldable and origami-type structures.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the Donnell shell theory for thin cylindrical shells, written in terms of the transverse displacement $w(x,y)$ and the Airy stress function $F(x,y)$, and solved by Galerkin projection. For post-buckling, the displacement is expanded in the Yamaki ansatz $$w=\sum a_{mn}\,\bigl[\cos(mx+ny)+(-1)^m\cos(mx-ny)\bigr],$$ with 38 terms retained; the stress function is obtained from the compatibility equation and substituted into equilibrium, producing a cubic algebraic system for the coefficients. This ansatz satisfies the clamped boundary conditions and is the same family used in Yamaki's pure-torsion analysis; the paper's new step is applying it to combined torsion and axial loads and showing that it captures the observed pattern transitions.

What would settle it

Run finite element eigenvalue sweeps with a broad random imperfection spectrum on a clamped shell under torsion with $P_0 = 0.5 P_{cr0}$ and look for a first post-buckling mode that is not periodic in the circumferential direction; if such a localized mode appears, the 38-term ansatz is incomplete. An experiment that finds a pattern transition at load ratios the model forbids would also settle the matter.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a Donnell shell theory solved by the Galerkin method determines the critical buckling load, critical circumferential wavenumber, buckling pattern, and post-buckling equilibrium path of clamped-clamped thin cylindrical shells under combined torsional and axial loads. It shows that the critical axial strain falls as the shear-to-axial stress ratio rises, and that even a very small shear stress ($\tau/\sigma = 0.005$ or $0.01$) switches the critical pattern from diamond-shaped to diagonal-shaped. In the post-buckling regime, torsion with small pre-compression behaves much like pure torsion, whereas larger pre-compression (for example $P_0 = 0.5 P_{cr0}$) makes the torque drop toward zero and the pattern transition from diagonal to twisted diamond. Torsion with pre-tension, by contrast, raises the critical torque and can turn the post-buckling path from unstable to stable. The theoretical results agree well with finite element simulations and qualitatively capture the experimental observations.

Load-bearing premise

The whole calculation depends on the assumption that every relevant buckled shape is a sum of paired cosine modes inherited from pure torsion; a localized, non-periodic, or otherwise novel mode under combined loads would not be captured.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Pre-tension under torsion increases the critical buckling torque substantially and can make the post-buckling path stable, so tension acts as a tuner for torsional load capacity.
  • Even a tiny shear stress relative to compression changes the critical buckling pattern from diamond-shaped to diagonal-shaped, implying that pattern selection under combined loading is highly sensitive to the load ratio.
  • Torsion with relatively large pre-compression causes snapping and a transition from a diagonal-shaped to a twisted diamond-shaped pattern, while small pre-compression behaves like pure torsion.
  • Compression with pre-torsion lowers the critical compressive load and, at large pre-torsion, drives the shell directly into a diagonal-shaped post-buckling pattern.
  • The Galerkin method computes critical loads and wavenumbers in seconds rather than the minutes needed for finite element analysis, making parametric sweeps over geometry and load ratio practical.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • An implied design map, not drawn in the paper, is the boundary in preload space between diagonal and twisted-diamond post-buckling patterns; that boundary could be used to select target fold patterns in shell-inspired origami devices.
  • A natural next test is a systematic experimental sweep of preload ratios to map the transition boundary and compare it with the model's predicted phase boundary, since the present experiments use only a few discrete preload levels.
  • The paper uses small deterministic eigenmode imperfections in FEA; a broader imperfection-sensitivity study under combined loads would test whether the same ansatz survives realistic geometric noise.
  • For thicker or longer shells the Donnell assumptions become questionable, so an extension to shear-deformable shell theories would be needed before applying the framework outside the thin, short-shell regime studied here.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This paper combines experiments, finite element simulations, and a Donnell-theory/Galerkin model to study buckling and post-buckling of clamped-clamped thin cylindrical shells under combined torsion and axial loads. Three loading scenarios are considered: compression with pre-torsion, torsion with pre-tension, and torsion with pre-compression. The theoretical model provides critical buckling loads, critical circumferential wavenumbers, buckling patterns, and post-buckling equilibrium paths using a displacement ansatz inherited from Yamaki's pure-torsion analysis. The paper reports good agreement between the Galerkin predictions and FEA for critical loads and wavenumbers, and qualitative agreement with experiments for several post-buckling phenomena, including a diagonal-to-twisted-diamond pattern transition under torsion with relatively large pre-compression. The authors make their Mathematica and Abaqus files available on GitHub.

Significance. If the results hold, the paper fills a genuine gap: post-buckling behavior of cylindrical shells under combined torsional and axial loads has rarely been studied systematically. The critical-buckling part is a clear strength: the Galerkin critical loads and wavenumbers agree closely with FEA across a range of R/h and L/R, the model reduces to Yamaki's pure-torsion result when kx = 0, and the derivation is self-contained with no constants fitted to the experiments. The experimental observations of pattern transitions, especially the twisted-diamond pattern under torsion with pre-compression, are valuable. However, the paper's central post-buckling claim is not fully established: the restricted displacement ansatz cannot represent the observed twisted-diamond transition in one of the headline cases, and the experimental boundary conditions for compression with pre-torsion differ from those used in the theory and FEA. These issues require either an extension of the analysis or a substantial qualification of the claims before the paper can be accepted.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. 3.4, Eqs. (32)-(33)] The post-buckling displacement field is restricted to the two-term family w = sum a_mn [cos(mx+ny) + (-1)^m cos(mx-ny)], which forces equal amplitudes for the two helical components. Under combined torsion and compression the reflection symmetry y -> -y is broken by the shear stress, so the general bifurcation mode should allow independent amplitudes for cos(mx+ny) and cos(mx-ny). The consequence appears in Sec. 5.3, Fig. 9(b): for P0 = 0.5Pcr0, the Galerkin model predicts that both torque and twist decrease to zero after buckling, i.e., snap-back to the unbuckled state, whereas FEA and experiments show the diagonal-to-twisted-diamond transition. The paper acknowledges this discrepancy and attributes it to non-periodic experimental deformation modes, but the ansatz restriction is itself a plausible and untested cause. Since the abstract claims the model determines the post-buckling path and pattern under combined loads, this is a load-bearing gap. The authors should either extend the ansatz to unequal helical amplitudes and demonstrate that a twisted-diamond branch exists, or substantially qualify the post-buckling claims.
  2. [Sec. 2 vs. Secs. 4-5] The experimental protocol for compression with pre-torsion holds the pre-twist angle constant during compression, so no rotation is allowed at either end once the pre-twist is applied. In the theoretical model and FEA, however, the loaded end is free to rotate during compression, as stated in Sec. 4 and reiterated in the note in Sec. 5.2. Section 5.2 explicitly says that the FEA results 'differ from the experimental results' for this case. Therefore the comparison between theory/FEA and experiments in Fig. 2 is qualitative in only a loose sense. The abstract's claim that the model 'qualitatively captures the various buckling phenomena observed in the experiments' should be calibrated to this boundary-condition mismatch, and the discussion should state which experimental features are and are not expected to be reproduced.
  3. [Sec. 5.3, Fig. 9(b)] Even for torsion with pre-compression, where the boundary conditions of theory and FEA match the experiments, the FEA torque-twist path after the snap does not agree with the experimentally measured torque variation; the paper itself notes that 'the torque variation obtained from these two methods also differs from that observed in experiments.' The statement that all approaches capture the key feature that torque tends to decrease to zero is not sufficient to support the conclusion that the model determines the post-buckling equilibrium path for this case. The manuscript should clearly separate what the model predicts, what FEA predicts, and what the experiments show, and should avoid a global claim of determining the post-buckling path under torsion with pre-compression unless the model branch can be connected to the observed pattern transition.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Sec. 3.4, text near Eq. (32)] The sentence 'in Yamaki (1984), Eq. (32)(32)' contains a duplicated equation number and should be corrected.
  2. [Sec. 5.2 and Table 1] The wavenumber discrepancies for R/h = 200 and 300 are attributed to 'shear deformation,' but the Donnell theory used here is a classical theory without transverse shear; please clarify this statement or provide a supporting reference.
  3. [Sec. 4] The FEA imperfection amplitudes (1%, 0.5%, 0.25% of the shell thickness) and the stabilization damping factor (10^-8) are chosen without a sensitivity study; a short robustness check would make the FEA-theory agreement more convincing.
  4. [Sec. 3.2, Eq. (10)] The nondimensionalization introduces many symbols in a single unnumbered display; a numbered list or table of dimensionless variables would improve readability.
  5. [Abstract and Conclusions] The conclusion appropriately limits the findings to thin, short shells, but the abstract does not carry this limitation; adding a brief scope sentence to the abstract would prevent overgeneralization.
  6. [Figures 6 and 9] The relation between the circumferential wavenumber N shown in the figures and the mode indices (m,n) in Eqs. (32)-(33) is not stated explicitly; adding this relation would help readers interpret the reported mode transitions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the critical and post-buckling predictions follow from the Donnell–Galerkin model with no fit to the target experimental results.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is self-contained. Critical buckling loads, wavenumbers, and patterns are obtained from the Donnell shell equations by solving the eigenvalue problem |C| = 0 in Eqs. (26)-(31), with only geometric parameters (L/R, R/h) and Poisson's ratio as inputs. Post-buckling paths are obtained by solving the algebraic system Eq. (43), again with no adjustable parameter fitted to FEA or experimental data. FEA and experiments serve as independent checks, and the paper reports good quantitative agreement for critical loads and qualitative agreement for patterns. The post-buckling displacement ansatz in Eqs. (32)-(33) is explicitly inherited from Yamaki (1984) and is acknowledged as such; adopting a restricted mode family is a modeling assumption, not a circular step, because the ansatz is not derived from, nor fitted to, the conclusions it is used to produce. The FEA imperfection amplitudes (1%, 0.5%, 0.25% of thickness) are user-specified inputs to the FEA only and are not fitted to make the theoretical predictions appear. The admitted disagreement for torsion with pre-compression P0 = 0.5Pcr0 in Section 5.3 and Fig. 9(b), where the Galerkin model predicts snap-back while FEA and experiments show a twisted diamond pattern, is a limitation of the ansatz and loading method, not a circular validation. Self-citations in the introduction are contextual and not load-bearing in the derivation. Therefore no circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model has no fitted material or geometric constants; the central derivation is from Donnell equations. The main auxiliary choices are the Yamaki-type ansatz, the FEA imperfection amplitudes, the stabilization damping, and the assumption that idealized boundary conditions can be compared with the experiments.

free parameters (2)
  • FEA geometric imperfection amplitudes = 1%, 0.5%, 0.25% of shell thickness for first three eigenmodes
    Section 4: chosen by hand to trigger bifurcation in post-buckling FEA; not calibrated to measured imperfections, so snapping predictions depend on this choice.
  • Abaqus stabilization damping factor = 1e-8
    Section 4: introduced to stabilize quasi-static post-buckling FEA; chosen as a numerical tuning parameter rather than a measured physical quantity.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Donnell shell theory with moderate rotations is accurate for the shells considered
    Section 3.1 and Appendix; limits stated for thin short shells; breaks down for thicker or longer shells where shear deformation and edge effects matter.
  • ad hoc to paper The post-buckling displacement ansatz w = sum a_mn [cos(mx+ny) + (-1)^m cos(mx-ny)] spans all relevant bifurcation modes
    Section 3.4, Eqs. (32)-(33); inherited from Yamaki (1984) for pure torsion, assumed valid for combined loads, with no completeness proof.
  • standard math Clamped boundary conditions reduce to w = 0, w_x = 0 plus stress-function conditions at x = +/- pi/2
    Section 3.1, Eqs. (14)-(15); standard reduction for Donnell-type shell equations.
  • domain assumption The loaded end in theory and FEA can be represented as free to rotate and translate, comparable to experimental load protocols
    Section 4 and Section 5.2: the paper admits this differs from experiment for compression with pre-torsion; comparison is qualitative only.
  • domain assumption Mylar film behavior is linear elastic with E = 3.5 GPa and nu = 0.3
    Section 2; material characterization is not provided, and no plasticity or rate dependence is modeled.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Buckling and post-buckling of cylindrical shells under combined torsional and axial loads." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/B5KO5IEP

@misc{pith2026250112475,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Buckling and post-buckling of cylindrical shells under combined torsional and axial loads},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/B5KO5IEP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.12475}
}
read the original abstract

The buckling behavior of cylindrical shells has gained significant interest over the past century due to its rich nonlinear behavior and broad engineering applications. While the buckling of cylindrical shells under a single load (e.g., compression or torsion) has been extensively studied, the buckling behavior under combined torsional and axial loads remains largely unexplored. In this paper, based on a combination of experiments, theoretical modeling, and finite element simulations, we systematically investigate the buckling and post-buckling behavior of cylindrical shells under combined torsional and axial loads. Three different types of combined loads are considered: compression with pre-torsion, torsion with pre-tension, and torsion with pre-compression. The theoretical model is established within the framework of the Donnell shell theory and solved using the Galerkin method, through which the critical buckling load, critical circumferential wavenumber, buckling pattern, and post-buckling equilibrium path of clamped-clamped thin cylindrical shells under various types of loads can be determined. The theoretical predictions agree well with finite element simulations and qualitatively capture the various buckling phenomena observed in the experiments. It is found that cylindrical shells exhibit quite different post-buckling behavior under combined loads compared to under a single compressive or torsional load. For instance, when a clamped-clamped thin cylindrical shell is subjected to pure torsion or torsion with a relatively small pre-compression, it consistently shows a diagonal-shaped pattern during deformation. However, with a relatively large pre-compression, the shell transitions from a diagonal-shaped pattern to a twisted diamond-shaped pattern.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.12475 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Experimental images of buckling patterns of a cylindrical shell under a single load or combined torsional and axial loads. (a) Initial state of the cylindrical shell; buckling pattern under (b) pure compression; (c) pure torsion; (d) compression with pre-torsion; (e) torsion with pre-compression; (f) torsion with pre-tension. The orange arrows represent the preloads. Scale bar: 20 mm [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_f… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Experimental results of the normalized compressive force versus the normalized displacement for post-buckling behavior of a C-C cylindrical shell under pure compression or compression with pre-torsion. (a) Experimental setup for the post-buckling tests under a single load or combined loads. (b) Post-buckling [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 7
Figure 7. Normalized compressive force Σ versus the dimensionless end shortening  for post-buckling behavior of C-C cylindrical shells with L/R = 1 under compression with pre-torsion T0 = 0.25Tcr0: (a) R/h = 200, (b) R/h = 300, (c) R/h = 400, and (d) R/h = 500. The buckling patterns are obtained from FEA. In the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p029_7.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Normalized compressive force Σ versus the dimensionless end shortening  for post-buckling behavior of C-C cylindrical shells with R/h = 200 under compression with pre-torsion T0 = 0.25Tcr0: (a) L/R [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p031_8.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Bifurcation reordering programs snap-through symmetry in folded elastic ribbons

    cond-mat.soft 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Fold position in a symmetric folded ribbon reorders pitchfork and saddle-node bifurcations, switching snap-through between asymmetric and symmetric pathways.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 40 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    A simplified method of elastic-stability analysis for thin cylindrical shells

    Batdorf, S., 1947. A simplified method of elastic-stability analysis for thin cylindrical shells. NACA Technical Report (No. NACA-TR-874)

    work page 1947

  2. [2]

    Critical combinations of torsion and direct axial stress for thin-walled cylinders

    Batdorf, S., Stein, M., Schildcrout, M., 1947. Critical combinations of torsion and direct axial stress for thin-walled cylinders. NACA Technical Note (No. NACA-TN-1345)

    work page 1947

  3. [3]

    An experimental investigation into the buckling and post-buckling of CFRP shells under combined axial and torsion loading

    Bisagni, C., Cordisco, P., 2003. An experimental investigation into the buckling and post-buckling of CFRP shells under combined axial and torsion loading. Composite Structures 60, 391-402

    work page 2003

  4. [4]

    Post-buckling behavior of cylinders in torsion, IUTAM Symposium on The Theory of Thin Shells

    Budiansky, B., 1967. Post-buckling behavior of cylinders in torsion, IUTAM Symposium on The Theory of Thin Shells. September 5-9, Copenhagen, Denmark

    work page 1967

  5. [5]

    Surface wrinkling and folding of core –shell soft cylinders

    Cao, Y .-P., Li, B., Feng, X.-Q., 2012. Surface wrinkling and folding of core –shell soft cylinders. Soft Matter 8, 556-562

    work page 2012

  6. [6]

    Helicoids, wrinkles, and loops in twisted ribbons

    Chopin, J., Kudrolli, A., 2013. Helicoids, wrinkles, and loops in twisted ribbons. Physical Review Letters 111, 174302

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    Twisting a Cylindrical Sheet Makes It a Tunable Locking Material

    Dong, P., He, M., Keim, N.C., Paulsen, J.D., 2023. Twisting a Cylindrical Sheet Makes It a Tunable Locking Material. Physical Review Letters 131, 148201

    work page 2023

  8. [8]

    Stability of thin -walled tubes under torsion

    Donnell, L.H., 1935. Stability of thin -walled tubes under torsion. NACA Technical Report (No. NACA-TR-479)

    work page 1935

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    Suppressing torsional buckling in auxetic meta-shells

    Ghorbani, A., Mirzaali, M.J., Roebroek, T., Coulais, C., Bonn, D., van der Linden, E., Habibi, M., 2024. Suppressing torsional buckling in auxetic meta-shells. Nature Communications 15, 6999

    2024

  2. [10]

    Imperfections, a main contributor to scatter in experimental values of buckling load

    Horton, W., Durham, S., 1965. Imperfections, a main contributor to scatter in experimental values of buckling load. International Journal of Solids and Structures 1, 59-72

    1965

  3. [11]

    Exploiting dynamic bifurcation in elastic ribbons for mode skipping and selection

    Huang, W., Yu, T., Vella, D., Hsia, K.J., Liu, M., 2024. Exploiting dynamic bifurcation in elastic ribbons for mode skipping and selection. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids, 105721

    2024

  4. [12]

    Twist buckling and the foldable cylinder: an exercise in origami

    Hunt, G.W., Ario, I., 2005. Twist buckling and the foldable cylinder: an exercise in origami. International Journal of Non-Linear Mechanics 40, 833-843

    2005

  5. [13]

    Localized buckling in long axially-loaded cylindrical shells

    Hunt, G.W., Neto, E.L., 1991. Localized buckling in long axially-loaded cylindrical shells. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 39, 881-894

    1991

  6. [14]

    Postbuckling theory

    Hutchinson, J., Koiter, W., 1970. Postbuckling theory. Applied Mechanics Reviews 23, 1353-1366

    1970

  7. [15]

    Knockdown factors for buckling of cylindrical and spherical shells subject to reduced biaxial membrane stress

    Hutchinson, J.W., 2010. Knockdown factors for buckling of cylindrical and spherical shells subject to reduced biaxial membrane stress. International Journal of Solids and Structures 47, 1443-1448. 46

    2010

  8. [16]

    Imperfections and energy barriers in shell buckling

    Hutchinson, J.W., Thompson, J.M.T., 2018. Imperfections and energy barriers in shell buckling. International Journal of Solids and Structures 148, 157-168

    2018

  9. [17]

    Kresling, B., 2008. Natural twist buckling in shells: from the hawkmoth’s bellows to the deployable Kresling -pattern and cylindrical Miura -ori, Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Computation of Shell and Spatial Structures IASS-IACM. 28-31 May, Ithaca, NY , USA

    2008

  10. [18]

    Torsional instabilities and morphology transitions in clamped ribbons under pretension

    Liu, H., Liu, L., Hu, J., Liu, D., 2024. Torsional instabilities and morphology transitions in clamped ribbons under pretension. European Journal of Mechanics-A/Solids 105, 105249

    2024

  11. [19]

    Inflatable origami: Multimodal deformation via multistability

    Melancon, D., Forte, A.E., Kamp, L.M., Gorissen, B., Bertoldi, K., 2022. Inflatable origami: Multimodal deformation via multistability. Advanced Functional Materials 32, 2201891

    2022

  12. [20]

    Buckling loads of CFRP composite cylinders under combined axial and torsion loading –experiments and computations

    Meyer-Piening, H.-R., Farshad, M., Geier, B., Zimmermann, R., 2001. Buckling loads of CFRP composite cylinders under combined axial and torsion loading –experiments and computations. Composite structures 53, 427-435

    2001

  13. [21]

    Twist -induced snapping in a bent elastic rod and ribbon

    Sano, T.G., Wada, H., 2019. Twist -induced snapping in a bent elastic rod and ribbon. Physical Review Letters 122, 114301

    2019

  14. [22]

    Buckling and postbuckling of imperfect cylindrical shells: a review

    Simitses, G.J., 1986. Buckling and postbuckling of imperfect cylindrical shells: a review. Applied Mechanics Reviews 39(10), 1517-1524

    1986

  15. [23]

    Post -buckling analysis of functionally graded multilayer graphene platelet reinforced composite cylindrical shells under axial compression

    Sun, J., Zhu, S., Tong, Z., Zhou, Z., Xu, X., 2020. Post -buckling analysis of functionally graded multilayer graphene platelet reinforced composite cylindrical shells under axial compression. Proceedings of the Royal Society A 476, 20200506

    2020

  16. [24]

    Theory of elastic stability

    Timoshenko, S.P., Gere, J.M., 1961. Theory of elastic stability. 2nd ed. McGraw-Hill, New York

    1961

  17. [25]

    On the transition from a diamond mode to an axisymmetric mode of collapse in cylindrical shells

    Tvergaard, V ., 1983. On the transition from a diamond mode to an axisymmetric mode of collapse in cylindrical shells. international Journal of Solids and Structures 19, 845-856. V on Karman, T., Tsien, H.-S., 1941. The buckling of thin cylindrical shells under axial compressi...

    1983

  18. [26]

    Multi-triangles cylindrical origami and inspired metamaterials with tunable stiffness and stretchable robotic arm

    Wang, X., Qu, H., Li, X., Kuang, Y ., Wang, H., Guo, S., 2023. Multi-triangles cylindrical origami and inspired metamaterials with tunable stiffness and stretchable robotic arm. PNAS nexus 2, pgad098

    2023

  19. [27]

    Buckling of thin-walled circular cylinders

    Weingarten, V .I., Seide, P., Peterson, J.P., 1968. Buckling of thin-walled circular cylinders. NASA Special Publication (No. NASA-SP-8007). 47

    1968

  20. [28]

    Stability of circular cylindrical steel shells under combined loading

    Winterstetter, T.A., Schmidt, H., 2002. Stability of circular cylindrical steel shells under combined loading. Thin-Walled Structures 40, 893-910

    2002

  21. [29]

    Stretchable origami robotic arm with omnidirectional bending and twisting

    Wu, S., Ze, Q., Dai, J., Udipi, N., Paulino, G.H., Zhao, R., 2021. Stretchable origami robotic arm with omnidirectional bending and twisting. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 118, e2110023118

    2021

  22. [30]

    On axisymmetric/diamond -like mode transitions in axially compressed core–shell cylinders

    Xu, F., Potier -Ferry, M., 2016. On axisymmetric/diamond -like mode transitions in axially compressed core–shell cylinders. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 94, 68-87

    2016

  23. [31]

    Elastic stability of circular cylindrical shells

    Yamaki, N., 1984. Elastic stability of circular cylindrical shells. Elsevier

    1984

  24. [32]

    Pattern transitions in a soft cylindrical shell

    Yang, Y ., Dai, H.-H., Xu, F., Potier-Ferry, M., 2018. Pattern transitions in a soft cylindrical shell. Physical Review Letters 120, 215503

    2018

  25. [33]

    Complex Deformation in Soft Cylindrical Structures via Programmable Sequential Instabilities

    Yang, Y ., Read, H., Sbai, M., Zareei, A., Forte, A.E., Melancon, D., Bertoldi, K., 2024. Complex Deformation in Soft Cylindrical Structures via Programmable Sequential Instabilities. Advanced Materials, 2406611

    2024

  26. [34]

    Origami-based impact mitigation via rarefaction solitary wave creation

    Yasuda, H., Miyazawa, Y ., Charalampidis, E.G., Chong, C., Kevrekidis, P.G., Yang, J., 2019. Origami-based impact mitigation via rarefaction solitary wave creation. Science Advances 5, eaau2835

    2019

  27. [35]

    On the mechanism of buckling of a circular cylindrical shell under axial compression

    Yoshimura, Y ., 1955. On the mechanism of buckling of a circular cylindrical shell under axial compression. NACA Technical Memorandum (No. NACA-TM-1390)

    1955

  28. [36]

    Origami -inspired, on -demand deployable and collapsible mechanical metamaterials with tunable stiffness

    Zhai, Z., Wang, Y ., Jiang, H., 2018. Origami -inspired, on -demand deployable and collapsible mechanical metamaterials with tunable stiffness. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, 2032-2037

    2018

  29. [37]

    Plug & play origami modules with all-purpose deformation modes

    Zhang, C., Zhang, Z., Peng, Y ., Zhang, Y ., An, S., Wang, Y ., Zhai, Z., Xu, Y ., Jiang, H., 2023. Plug & play origami modules with all-purpose deformation modes. Nature Communications 14, 4329

    2023

  30. [38]

    Propagation of solitary waves in origami -inspired metamaterials

    Zhang, Q., Rudykh, S., 2024. Propagation of solitary waves in origami -inspired metamaterials. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 187, 105626

    2024

  31. [39]

    Buckling and postbuckling behaviors of imperfect cylindrical shells subjected to torsion

    Zhang, X., Han, Q., 2007. Buckling and postbuckling behaviors of imperfect cylindrical shells subjected to torsion. Thin-Walled Structures 45, 1035-1043. 48

    2007

  32. [40]

    Axial compression-induced wrinkles on a core–shell soft cylinder: Theoretical analysis, simulations and experiments

    Zhao, Y ., Cao, Y ., Feng, X.-Q., Ma, K., 2014. Axial compression-induced wrinkles on a core–shell soft cylinder: Theoretical analysis, simulations and experiments. Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids 73, 212-227

    2014

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.