Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 34 references

Crystal growth, measurement and modeling of the optical activity of $\alpha$-GeO$_2$. Comparison with $\alpha$-SiO$_2$

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read One fitted constant, Γ=0.11, reproduces the wavelength-dependent optical rotation of both α-GeO2 and α-SiO2, and the paper reports the first bulk α-GeO2 crystals large enough to measure it.

desk verdict Solid new α-GeO2 data and crystal growth, but Eq. (2) as printed mismatches the reported g33 values by a factor of ~600 – likely a fixable typo, so the modeling claim needs revision before it is credible. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.12496 v1 pith:3E7KNQW3 submitted 2025-01-21 physics.optics

Alexandra Pena , Corinne Felix , Bertrand Menaert , Benoit Boulanger This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords opticalactivitygyrationtensorα-GeO2quartzrotatorypowertop-seededsolutiongrowthchiralcrystalsempiricaldispersionmodel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper seeks to establish that the optical activity of the quartz-family crystals α-GeO2 and α-SiO2 can be described by a single empirical formula with one fitted constant. The authors grew, for the first time, bulk α-GeO2 crystals up to 3.5 cm³ using a high-temperature flux method, cut oriented slabs along the optical axis, and measured the wavelength-dependent rotation of linear polarization between 0.3 and 2 µm. They report the first g33 gyration values for α-GeO2, about twice those of quartz, and show that Eq. (2), based on the ordinary refractive index and the structural helix pitch, reproduces the dispersion of both crystals. If correct, this means the optical rotation of these chiral crystals can be predicted from two readily available quantities: the refractive index and the c lattice parameter.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is Eq. (2), the empirical dispersion law for the gyration coefficient. Its ingredients are the ordinary refractive index $n_o(\lambda)$, which enters as the macroscopic first-order susceptibility $n_o^2-1$, and $\Lambda$, the pitch of the structural helix along the optical axis, equal to the crystal parameter c. The dimensionless constant $\Gamma$ is fitted once, giving $0.11\pm0.02$ for both α-GeO2 and α-SiO2; the model's power is that a single value of $\Gamma$ collapses two datasets whose $g_{33}$ magnitudes differ by about a factor of two.

What would settle it

Measure the rotatory power of the same α-GeO2 slab with a technique independent of crossed-polarizer spectrophotometry, such as two-modulator generalized ellipsometry at oblique incidence, and compare the resulting $g_{33}(\lambda)$ with Eq. (2) over 0.3–2 µm.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the paper's central discovery is that the wavelength dispersion of the gyration coefficient $g_{33}$ for both α-GeO2 and α-SiO2, measured along the optical axis, is accounted for by $g_{33}(\lambda)=\Gamma[n_o(\lambda)^2-1](\Lambda/\lambda)^2$ with $\Gamma=0.11\pm0.02$ and $\Lambda$ the crystallographic c parameter, i.e. the pitch of the structural helix. The same $\Gamma$ fits both compounds even though their $g_{33}$ magnitudes differ by about a factor of two; the model uses the macroscopic first-order electric susceptibility $n_o^2-1$ and the ratio $\Lambda/\lambda$. Alongside this, the paper reports the first bulk α-GeO2 crystals reaching 3.5 cm³, with a rocking-curve FWHM of 0.009°, and the first $g_{33}$ spectrum for α-GeO2, with values such as $52.69\times10^{-5}$ at 0.3 µm against $24.48\times10^{-5}$ for quartz.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the polarizer–analyzer spectrophotometer returns absolute rotation angles with no sample-dependent systematic error; the quartz control validates the method only approximately, because its measured $g_{33}$ runs 5–7% above the published reference and there is no independent α-GeO2 dataset to check against.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • With the molybdate-phosphate flux, α-GeO2 crystals up to 3.5 cm³ and 32 arcsec rocking-curve width become available for high-temperature optical components where quartz would degrade.
  • The reported $g_{33}(\lambda)$ of α-GeO2, roughly twice quartz's, sets the first experimental benchmark for gyration in this crystal between 0.3 and 2 µm.
  • Because $\Gamma$ is the same for both compounds and the model uses only $n_o(\lambda)$ and c, $g_{33}(\lambda)$ can be estimated for other quartz-family chiral crystals such as α-AlPO4 and α-GaPO4 from their refractive indices and lattice parameters.
  • The model's validity over the measured range implies that optical activity near the band edge follows a squared inverse-wavelength behavior modulated by the susceptibility, rather than a more complex resonance shape.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Editorial inference: if $\Gamma$ is truly universal for the quartz family, the model can serve as a design rule: measure $n_o(\lambda)$ and c, and the full $g_{33}$ spectrum follows without any rotation measurement.
  • Editorial inference: the paper's own comparison shows the measured quartz $g_{33}$ runs 5–7% above the published reference, so the reported α-GeO2 values may carry a similar systematic bias; an independent ellipsometric or polarimetric measurement on the same slab would settle this.
  • Editorial inference: the appearance of $n_o^2-1$ and $\Lambda/\lambda$ hints that the same law could be tested in other helical inorganic crystals where the helix pitch and refractive index are known, offering a quick screen for strong optical rotators.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports (i) growth of bulk α-GeO2 single crystals by top-seeded solution growth with a molybdate-phosphate flux, reaching volumes up to 3.5 cm3 with a 0.009° rocking-curve FWHM, and (ii) measurements of optical rotatory power and of the gyration coefficient g33 along the optical axis from 0.3 to 2 μm using a polarizer-analyzer spectrophotometer, validated on an α-SiO2 slab. The authors report a first g33 dataset for α-GeO2, approximately twice that of α-SiO2, and propose an empirical dispersion model, Eq. (2), with a single constant Γ = 0.11 ± 0.02 that is claimed to describe both materials.

Significance. The crystal-growth result is a clear step forward: centimeter-size α-GeO2 boules with good crystalline quality and twin-controlled slabs enable first spectroscopic measurements of optical activity in this material. The comparison with α-SiO2 and the observation that a simple empirical relation may hold with the same Γ for two isostructural compounds is potentially useful. The usefulness of the modeling claim depends entirely on Eq. (2) being corrected and on a proper treatment of uncertainties and fit quality; the measurement/reference offset also needs analysis. Strengths include the explicit control of crystal orientation, the use of a quartz reference slab, and the transparent presentation of growth parameters.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.3, Eq. (2) and Table 2] As printed, Eq. (2) cannot reproduce the paper's own data. For α-GeO2 at λ = 0.3 μm, using Γ = 0.11, Λ = 5.6527×10^-4 μm, and n_o ≈ 1.85 so that n_o^2 − 1 ≈ 2.4, Eq. (2) gives g33 ≈ 9×10^-7, whereas Table 2 lists |g33| = 52.69×10^-5, a mismatch of about 600×. The same problem occurs for α-SiO2 and at every wavelength. Because the abstract and Section 3.3 state that Eq. (2) "perfectly describes" the measurements, this inconsistency is load-bearing. Please correct Eq. (2) (the data suggest a Λ/λ factor rather than (Λ/λ)^2), or reconcile Γ, Λ, and Table 2.
  2. [Section 3.3, Table 2] The α-SiO2 validation shows a systematic 5–7% excess relative to Ref. [34] (13.50 vs 12.81 ± 0.08 at 0.510 μm; 10.74 vs 10.06 ± 0.07 at 0.6328 μm). The text describes this only as "slightly higher" without analysis. If this offset is a setup bias, the α-GeO2 values inherit it, and no independent α-GeO2 data exist to detect it. The manuscript should provide uncertainty estimates for φ, L, n_o, and g33 and either explain or correct the quartz offset.
  3. [Section 3.3 and Fig. 5b] Γ is obtained by interpolating the same g33(λ) data that the model is then claimed to describe, so the agreement is not an out-of-sample validation. The fact that separate fits give the same Γ for α-SiO2 and α-GeO2 is suggestive, but the manuscript does not report residuals, number of fitted points, or fit uncertainty. Please quantify the fit quality (for example with a residual plot or a goodness-of-fit metric) and state explicitly that Γ is a fitted empirical parameter whose physical interpretation remains open, as the conclusion already acknowledges.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (1)] Eq. (1) is typeset incorrectly in the manuscript; the relation between ρ, φ, L, λ, n_o, and g33 should be displayed unambiguously.
  2. [Table 2] Table 2 has a confusing layout with split rows for the reference values; reformat it so that each wavelength row contains both measured and reference values in clearly labeled columns.
  3. [Abstract] The Abstract statement that "both crystals show a magnitude of optical activity of 3.4×10^-5 rad/μm in the near IR range" should specify whether this refers to rotatory power ρ or to g33, and at which wavelength it is evaluated.
  4. [Fig. 5] Fig. 5 should include error bars and should distinguish measured points from the model curves, since the "perfectly describes" claim is not visually verifiable from the current figure.
  5. [General presentation] Please typeset cm3 as cm³, replace "at naked eye" with a more formal phrasing, and correct the superscript formatting throughout the text.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: Eq. (2) is an explicitly empirical one-parameter fit to the measured g33(λ) data, and the reported agreement is an interpolation rather than an out-of-sample prediction; self-citations are independent experimental inputs.

full rationale

The paper's only modeling claim is Eq. (2), introduced as an empirical interpolation: 'The interpolation of the experimental data in Fig. 5b by Eq. (2) taking Γ as the interpolation parameter ... leads to the same value of the Γ constant for both α-SiO2 and α-GeO2.' The free constant Γ is fitted directly to the same g33(λ) spectra that the equation then 'perfectly describes', so the agreement is a measure of fit quality, not a validated prediction. The paper does not present the agreement as an out-of-sample test, nor does it claim the model was derived from first principles; the conclusion explicitly leaves the physical meaning of Γ open. The cross-material consistency (one Γ for two iso-structural crystals) is a weak but non-tautological check. Self-citations (Refs. [3], [9], [11]) provide growth conditions, refractive-index dispersions, and piezoelectric data that are independently measurable and are not used as a uniqueness theorem or as a premise that reduces to this paper's claims. A separate internal inconsistency exists: the printed Eq. (2) with the (Λ/λ)^2 factor yields g33 values roughly three orders of magnitude smaller than Table 2, suggesting a typographical or scaling error; however, that is a correctness issue, not a circularity issue. No load-bearing step reduces to its own input by definition or by self-citation.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central measurement rests on standard formulas and experimental calibration; the model adds one fitted constant Γ and a geometric interpretation of Λ as the lattice parameter c. The paper introduces no new physical entities. The main ledger burden is the unvalidated empirical form of Eq. (2) and the untested assumption that Γ is material-independent.

free parameters (1)
  • Γ (empirical model constant) = 0.11 ± 0.02
    Fitted to the measured g33(λ) of α-SiO2 and α-GeO2 in Fig. 5b; the paper states its physical meaning remains to be determined (Conclusion).
assumptions (4)
  • standard math Standard relation ρ = π g33/(λ n_o) along the optical axis of a class-32 uniaxial crystal.
    Invoked in Section 3.3, Eq. (1); standard result from optical activity theory.
  • ad hoc to paper The model g33 = Γ(n_o²−1)(Λ/λ)² is a valid form for quartz-family crystals.
    Proposed empirically in Section 3.3, Eq. (2); no derivation, and the printed equation does not reproduce the reported values with the stated constants.
  • domain assumption The selected slabs are free of chiral twins and their orientation is accurate to 0.01°.
    Section 2.3 and Section 3.2; crossed-polarizer inspection selected the slab, but two small twinned zones remain in the centimeter-size slab.
  • domain assumption Literature Sellmeier dispersion equations for n_o(λ) [11,33] apply to the measured crystals.
    Used in Section 3.3 to convert measured rotation to g33; any error in n_o propagates directly to g33.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Crystal growth, measurement and modeling of the optical activity of $\alpha$-GeO$_2$. Comparison with $\alpha$-SiO$_2$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3E7KNQW3

@misc{pith2026250112496,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Crystal growth, measurement and modeling of the optical activity of $\alpha$-GeO$_2$. Comparison with $\alpha$-SiO$_2$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3E7KNQW3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.12496}
}
abstract

This work aimed first at growing high quality bulk $\alpha$-GeO$_2$ crystals in their Quartz iso-structural form ($\alpha$-SiO$_2$), using a high temperature flux method. By optimizing the flux composition and the geometry and orientation of the seeds, it has been possible to achieve growth yields up to 90 % leading for the first time to bulk single crystals up to 3.5 cm$^3$. Thanks to the optical quality and size of the obtained crystals, the second step of this study was the measurement of the optical activity of $\alpha$-GeO$_2$ between 0.3 and 2 $\mu$m. This gave access to the value of one of the independent components of the gyration tensor (g33) as a function of the wavelength. An $\alpha$-SiO$_2$ slab have been used to validate our methodology. Both crystals show a magnitude of optical activity of 3.4x10$^{-5}$ rad/$\mu$m in the near IR range and great variations where the higher values are 3.4x10$^{-3}$ rad/$\mu$m and 1.7x10$^{-3}$ rad/$\mu$m at 0.3 $\mu$m for $\alpha$-GeO$_2$ and $\alpha$-SiO$_2$, respectively. The measurements are perfectly described by an empirical model that we propose and which relies on the macroscopic first-order electrical susceptibility and on the pitch of the structural helix compared to the wavelength of light.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.12496 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. (Top) Chiral crystal structure of α-GeO2 or α-SiO2: blue balls represent germanium or silicon atoms, while red balls correspond to oxygens, (a, b, c) is the crystallographic frame and Λ the pitch of the helix. (Down) Scheme of light propagation in a chiral medium: E is the electric polarization, k the wave vector,  the wavelength, and  the rotation angle of E due to optical activity. In this work, the growth of ce… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Schematic experimental setup based on a modified Lambda 900 spectrophotometer Perkin Elmer for measuring the magnitude of the optical activity of α-GeO2 and α-SiO2 crystals from 0.3 to 2.0 µm [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 29 canonical work pages

  1. [34]

    Arteaga, A

    O. Arteaga, A. Canillas, G.E. Jellison, Determination of the components of the gyration tensor of quartz by oblique incidence transmissio n two -modulator generalized elli psometry, Appl. Opt. 48(28) (2009) 5307 -5317, https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.48.005307

    work page doi:10.1364/ao.48.005307 2009

  2. [1]

    Galazka, R

    Z. Galazka, R. Blukis , A. Fiedler, S.B. Anooz, J. Zhang, M. Albrecht, T. Remmele, T. Schulz, D. Klimm, M. Pietsch, A. Kwasniewski, A. Dittmar, S. Ganschow, U. Juda, K. Stolze, M. Suendermann, T. Schroeder, M. Bickerman, Bulk single crystals and physical properties of Rutile GeO2 for high-power electronics and deep-ultraviolet optoelectronics, Phys. Statu...

    doi:10.1002/pssb.202400326 2024

  3. [2]

    Balitsky, V.S

    D.V. Balitsky, V.S. Balitsky, Yu V. Pisarevsky, O.Yu. Silvestrova, D.Yu. Pushcharovsky, Growth of germanium dioxide single crystals with -quartz structure and investigation of their crystal structure, optical, elastic, piezoelectric, diele ctric and mechanical properties, Ann. Chim. Sci. Mat. 26(1) (2001) 183-192

    work page 2001

  4. [3]

    Lignie, B

    A. Lignie, B. Ménaert, P. Armand, A. Peña, J. Debray, P. Papet, Top seeded solution growth and structural characterizations of -quartz-like structure GeO 2 single crystal, Cryst. Growth Des. 13(10) (2013) 4220 -4225, https://doi.org/10.1021/cg4000523

    work page doi:10.1021/cg4000523 2013

  5. [4]

    Takane, K

    H. Takane, K. Kaneko, Establishment of a growth route of crystallized rutile GeO2 thin films (1µm/h) and its structural properties, Appl. Phys. Lett. 119 (2021) 062104, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0060785

    work page doi:10.1063/5.0060785 2021

  6. [5]

    Rahaman, B.G

    I. Rahaman, B.G. Duersch, H.D. Ellis, M.A. Scarpulla, K. Fu, Epitaxial growth of rutile GeO2 via MOCVD, Appl. Phys. Lett. 125 (2024) 102103, https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0226661

    doi:10.1063/5.0226661 2024

  7. [6]

    G. Deng, Y. Huang, Z. Chen, K. Saito, T. Tanaka, M. Arita, Heteroepitaxy of (100) -oriented rutile GeO 2 film on c -plane sapphire by pulsed laser deposition, Mater. Lett. 326 (2022) 132945, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matlet.2022.132945

    arXiv 2022

  8. [7]

    S. Zhou, K. de Hond, J. Antoja -Lleonart, V. Ocelík, G. Koster, G. Rijnders, B. Noheda, Thin films of -quartz GeO2 on TiO2- buffered quartz substrates, Cryst. Growth Des. 24 (2024) 71-78, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.3c00476

    work page doi:10.1021/acs.cgd.3c00476 2024

Show all 34 references
  1. [8]

    S. Chae, K. Mengle, K. Bushick, J. Lee, N. Sanders, Z. Deng, Z. Mi, P.F.P. Poudeu, H. Paik, J.T. Heron, E. Kioupakis, Toward the predictive discovery of ambipolarly dopable ultra -wide-band-gap semiconductors: The case of rutile GeO 2, Appl. Phys. Lett. 118 (2021) 260501, http...

    2021 doi

  2. [9]

    Papet, M

    P. Papet, M. Bah, A. Haidoux, B. Ruffle, B. Ménaert, A. Peña, J. Debray, P. Armand, High temperature piezoelectric properties of flux-grown -GeO2 single crystal. J. Appl. Phys. 126(14) (2019) 144102, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5116026

    2019 doi

  3. [10]

    Density functional theory predictions of the nonlinear optical properties in α-Quartz-type germanium dioxide,

    P. Hermet, G. Fraysse, A. Lignie, P. Armand, and P. Papet, “Density functional theory predictions of the nonlinear optical properties in α-Quartz-type germanium dioxide,” J. Phys. Chem. C 116(15) (2012) 8692–8698, https://doi.org/10.1021/jp300855q

    2012 doi

  4. [11]

    Remark, P

    T. Remark, P. Segonds, A. Peña, B. Ménaert, J. Debray, D. Jegouso, M.C. Pujol, B. Boulanger, Linear and nonlinear optical properties of the piezoelectric c rystal -GeO2, Opt. Mater. Express 11(10) (2021) 3520 -3527, https://doi.org/10.1364/OME.439099 [l2] A.M. Glazer, K. Stad...

    2021 doi

  5. [13]

    Scheel, Developments in crystal growth from high-temperature solutions, Prog

    H.J. Scheel, Developments in crystal growth from high-temperature solutions, Prog. Crystal Growth and Charact. 5 (1982) 277-290, https://doi.org/10.1016/0146-3535(82)90002-8

    1982 doi

  6. [14]

    Elwell, H.J

    D. Elwell, H.J. Scheel, Crystal Growth from High-temperature Solutions, 1975. Academic Press

    1975

  7. [15]

    Bordui, S

    P.F. Bordui, S. Motakef, Hydrodynamic control of solution inclusion during crystal growth of KTiOPO4 (KTP) from high - temperature solution, J. Cryst. Growth 96 (1989) 405-412, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0248(89)90539-3

    1989 doi

  8. [16]

    Vartak, Y.-I

    B. Vartak, Y.-I. Kwon, A. Yeckel, J.J. Derby, An analysis of flow and mass transfer during the solution growth of potassium titanyl phosphate, J. Cryst. Growth 210(4) (2000) 704-718, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0248(99)00729-0

    2000 doi

  9. [17]

    Buchen, V

    J. Buchen, V. Wesemann, S. Dehmelt, A. Gross, D. Rytz, Twins in YAl3(BO3)4 and K2Al2B2O7 crystals as revealed by changes in optical activity, Crystals 9(1) (2019) 8, https://doi.org/10.3390/cryst9010008

    2019 doi

  10. [18]

    Yamada, Y

    T. Yamada, Y. Murata, H. Wagata, K. Yubuta, K. Teshima, Facile morphological modification of Ba5Nb4O15 crystals using chloride flux and in situ growth investigation, Cryst. Growth Des. 16 (2016) 3954 -3960, https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.cgd.6b00526

    2016 doi

  11. [19]

    Walker, Hydrothermal synthesis of quartz crystals, J

    A.C. Walker, Hydrothermal synthesis of quartz crystals, J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 36(8) (1953) 250 -256, https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1151-2916.1953.tb12877.x

    1953

  12. [20]

    Iwasaki , Morphological variations of quartz crystals as deduced from computer experiments , J

    H.Iwasaki, F. Iwasaki , Morphological variations of quartz crystals as deduced from computer experiments , J. Cryst. Growth. 151 (1995) 348-358, https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0248(95)00040-2

    1995 doi

  13. [21]

    Iwasaki, V.S

    H.Iwasaki, F. Iwasaki, V.S. Balitsky, L.V. Balitskaya, I.B. Makhina, Growth rates anisotropy of synthetic quartz crystals grown on Z -cut hexagonal seeds and computer simulatio ns of growth process , J. Cryst. Growth. 187 (1998) 481 -489, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0248(97)00868-3

    1998 doi

  14. [22]

    Izumi , VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data, J

    K.Momma, F. Izumi , VESTA 3 for three-dimensional visualization of crystal, volumetric and morphology data, J. Appl. GCrystallogr. 44 (2011) 41272-1276, https://doi.org/10.1107/S0021889811038970

    2011 doi

  15. [23]

    Dowty, Crystal structure and crystal growth; I, The influence of internal structure on morphology , Am

    E. Dowty, Crystal structure and crystal growth; I, The influence of internal structure on morphology , Am. Mineral. 61(5-

  16. [24]

    Masiello, G

    F. Masiello, G. Cembali, A.I. Chumakov, S.H. Connell, C. Ferrero, J. Hrtwig, I . Sergeev, P.V. Vaerenbergh , Rocking curve measurements revisited, J. Appl. Crystallogr. 47 (2014) 1304-1314, https://doi.org/10.1107/S1600576714012527

    2014 doi

  17. [26]

    W.Liu, L. Wang, Y. Chen, F. Fan, J. Shen , G. Zhang, Y. Li, H. Tu, Growth and characterization of Na 3La9O3(BO3)8 crystal in the improved flux system, Cryst. Growth Des. 15 (2015) 1180-1185, https://doi.org/10.1021/cg501554v

    2015 doi

  18. [27]

    Hahn , The application of eigensymmetries of face forms to anomalous scattering and twinning by merohedry in X-ray diffraction, Acta Cryst

    H.Klapper, Th. Hahn , The application of eigensymmetries of face forms to anomalous scattering and twinning by merohedry in X-ray diffraction, Acta Cryst. A66 (2010) 327-346, https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108767310001091

    2010 doi

  19. [28]

    Phakey, X-ray topographic study of defects in quartz I

    P.P. Phakey, X-ray topographic study of defects in quartz I. Brazil twin boundaries , Phys. stat. sol. 34 (1969) 105-119, https://doi.org/10.1002/pssb.19690340110

    1969 doi

  20. [29]

    Rangsten, C

    P. Rangsten, C. Hedlund, I. Katardjiev, Y. Bäcklund, Etch rates of crystallographic planes in Z-cut quartz-experiments and simulation, J. Micromech. Microeng. 8 (1998) 1-6, https://doi.org/10.1088/0960-1317/8/1/001

    1998 doi

  21. [30]

    Bakker, M.A

    R.J. Bakker, M.A. Elburg, A magmatic-hydrothermal transition in Arkaroola (northern Flinders Ranges, South Australia): from diopside -titanite pegmatites to hematite -quartz growth , Contrib Mineral Petrol. 152 (2006) 541 -569, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00410-006-0125-0

    2006 doi

  22. [31]

    Duclaux, P

    J. Duclaux, P. Jeantet, Mesures du pouvoir rotatoire du quartz dans l’ultraviolet , J. Phys. Radium 7(7) (1926) 200 -203, https://doi.org/10.1051/jphysrad:0192600707020000

    1926 doi

  23. [32]

    Lowry, W.R.C Coode -Adams, X

    T.M. Lowry, W.R.C Coode -Adams, X. Optical rotatory dispersion. Part III. -The rotatory dispersion of quartz in the infra - red, visible and ultra -violet regions of the sp ectrum, Philos. Trans. R. Soc. A 226 ( 1927) 391 -466, https://doi.org/10.1098/rsta.1927.0010

    1927

  24. [33]

    R adhakrishanan, Further studies on the temperature variation of the refractive index of crystals , Proc

    T. R adhakrishanan, Further studies on the temperature variation of the refractive index of crystals , Proc. Indian Acad. Sci. (Math. Sci.) 33 (1951) 22-34, https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03172255

    1951 doi

  25. [35]

    Devarajan, A.M

    V. Devarajan, A.M. Glazer, Theory and computation of optical rotatory power in inorganic crystals, Acta Cryst. A42 (1986) 560-569, https://doi.org/10.1107/S0108767386098732

    1986 doi

  26. [36]

    Pinan-Lucarre, R.Ouillon, P

    J.-P. Pinan-Lucarre, R.Ouillon, P. Ranson, Linear wave vector dependence of low-frequency Raman modes in two uniaxial gyrotropic quartz -type materials: α-GaPO4 and α-AlPO4, Chem. Phys. Lett . 302 (1999) 164-170, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0009-2614(99)00091-3

    1999 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.