Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 7 minor 1 cited by

Seasonal Changes -- Time for Paradigm Shift

T0 review · 4 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper proposes that a single temperature-derived number, the normalized daily temperature range (DTRT), can define the onset, duration, and end of all four seasons from its extreme values and inflection points.

desk verdict A plausible temperature-only seasonality index with an overreaching title, three-site qualitative validation, and an unvalidated regional extrapolation; worth a serious look but not the paradigm shift it claims. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.12882 v1 pith:ZXTFLBJK submitted 2025-01-22 physics.ao-ph

Branislava Lalic , Ana Firanj Sremac This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.ao-ph
keywords definitionofseasonsseasonalclassificationphenologicalmarkersshiftsnormalizeddailytemperaturerangeDTRTseasonalityindexEuro-Mediterranean
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that the four seasons and their transitions can be read from one atmospheric number: the normalized daily temperature range, $\mathrm{DTRT} = (T_{\max}-T_{\min})/T_{\mathrm{avg}}$. It claims that the annual cycle of DTRT mirrors plant phenology because plants respond to the same energy-balance changes that shape daily temperature variation. If this is true, any location can get a season calendar from temperature data alone, without vegetation data, and climate-change impacts on seasons can be tracked with a simple, universal metric. The paper demonstrates the alignment at three forest sites and then applies the method to map season durations and shifts across the Euro-Mediterranean region.

What carries the argument

The central object is the normalized daily temperature range, $\mathrm{DTRT} = (T_{\max}-T_{\min})/T_{\mathrm{avg}}$, whose annual cycle has a characteristic trapezoidal shape. The machinery is the shape itself: the first annual maximum marks the end of winter, the descending branch is spring, the flat minimum plateau is summer, the ascending branch is autumn, and the two inflection points around 50% of the annual amplitude mark the start and end of the growing season. The method uses these geometrical features of the DTRT curve rather than fixed calendar dates or predetermined temperature thresholds, which is what lets it produce site-specific seasonal calendars from temperature data alone.

What would settle it

A direct test would be to take dozens of stations across Europe with both long temperature series and independent ground phenology records (leaf-out and leaf-fall dates) and check whether DTRT's first annual maximum and its two ~50%-amplitude inflection points consistently fall within about two weeks of the observed phenological transitions; systematic misses in non-forest or Mediterranean climates would show the fixed thresholds do not generalize.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that the annual time series of DTRT has a shape that directly tracks biological seasons: approximately constant values in winter, a linear decrease in spring, a constant plateau in summer, and a linear increase in autumn. From this shape, the paper defines winter end as the first maximum of DTRT, the start of the growing season as the first inflection point near 50% of annual DTRT amplitude, the end of the growing season as the second such inflection point, summer as the constant-value plateau, and winter start as the return to constant values. At the three validation sites these DTRT-derived markers fall within 1–3 days of satellite phenology dates and within 5–11 days of ground-observed leaf-out and leaf-fall dates. Applied to ERA5-Land temperatures over the Euro-Mediterranean region for 1991–2020, the method produces seasonal calendars that show winters shortening, summers extending by more than 30 days per decade in some areas, and local features such as urban heat islands, large lakes, and oceanic influences imprinting on season durations.

Load-bearing premise

The same DTRT shape rules — first maximum ends winter, inflection points near 50% of annual amplitude bookend the growing season, and a constant plateau is summer — are assumed to hold everywhere, even though they were calibrated on only three forest sites plus earlier crop and orchard work, and even though the paper's validation is indirect because no standard benchmark for true season boundaries exists.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Seasonal calendars can be derived for any location with temperature records, including regions where vegetation is sparse or absent, because DTRT does not require plant measurements.
  • The Euro-Mediterranean maps imply that winter has shortened and summer has lengthened by more than 30 days per decade in parts of southern and central Europe between 1991–2000 and 2011–2020.
  • DTRT inflection points track growing-season start and end within a few days of satellite phenology, suggesting the index could serve as a phenology proxy when satellite or ground plant data are missing.
  • Local effects such as urban heat islands, large lakes, and the Gulf Stream imprint visibly on season durations, indicating the index can detect sub-regional climatic features.
  • The method could provide a common metric for comparing seasonal shifts across agriculture, forestry, urban planning, medicine, and tourism.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Because DTRT uses only daily maximum, minimum, and average temperatures, it could in principle be applied to historical station records that predate the satellite era, extending season-shift reconstructions decades further back than NDVI or LAI data allow; this is not tested in the paper.
  • The 50%-amplitude inflection rule and the constant-summer criterion were calibrated on mid- and high-latitude forest sites plus earlier crop and orchard work, so their quantitative validity in Mediterranean scrublands, arid regions, or tropical climates is an open question that the paper's own methods do not resolve.
  • The paper acknowledges the absence of a universally accepted benchmark for season classification; a direct comparison of DTRT-defined seasons against independent ground phenology networks across many sites would be the natural next test, rather than the indirect alignment used here.
  • If DTRT truly captures energy partitioning changes, it may also be sensitive to non-seasonal disturbances such as heat waves, cloud cover, or irrigation, which could contaminate the seasonal signal; the paper does not quantify this sensitivity.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 7 minor

Summary. The paper argues that conventional meteorological and astronomical season definitions are inadequate for capturing biosphere–atmosphere interactions, and proposes the normalized daily temperature range (DTRT = (Tmax−Tmin)/Tavg) as a biologically relevant seasonality index. The authors describe a rule-based method for identifying season boundaries from DTRT time series — winter ends at the first DTRT maximum, the growing season starts and ends at inflection points near 50% of the annual DTRT amplitude, and summer is a period of constant DTRT values — and validate this method at three FLUXNET forest sites (CA-Oas, DE-Hainich, US-PFa) against MODIS vegetation indices and ground phenology. They then apply the method to ERA5-Land reanalysis data (1991–2020) to map season durations, onsets, and decadal shifts over the Euro-Mediterranean region. The central claim is that DTRT is a universal, scalable seasonal classification that aligns with phenological markers and can detect regional and local climate influences.

Significance. If substantiated, the DTRT-based classification would offer an appealingly simple, temperature-only metric for tracking seasonality across ecosystems, with potential applications in agriculture, forestry, urban planning, and climate adaptation. The authors use openly available datasets (FLUXNET, MODIS, PEP725, PhenoCam, ERA5-Land) and their comparison with independent phenology databases provides a reasonable starting point. The paper is also honest in stating that no universally accepted benchmark exists for validating such a classification. However, the evidence presented is preliminary: the algorithm is underspecified, the validation is qualitative and contains a serious site-identification error, and the regional maps are presented without uncertainty or independent confirmation. The significance of the idea is not matched by the current level of proof.

major comments (4)
  1. [Section 2.1] The US site is misidentified. Section 2.1 states that US-PFa (Park Falls/WLEF) is located at 42.537755° N, 72.171478° W, but these coordinates correspond to Harvard Forest in Massachusetts, not Park Falls, Wisconsin (approximately 45.9° N, 90.3° W). The ground-based phenological data in Section 2.1.3 are explicitly described as coming from Harvard Forest (O'Keefe and VanScoy, 2024). Thus either the DTRT tower data are from Park Falls and are being compared against phenology from Harvard Forest, hundreds of kilometers away, or the site label is wrong. Either way, the US validation, which is one of only three cross-site tests of the central claim, is invalid and must be corrected.
  2. [Section 2.3 and Figure 2] The season-detection algorithm is not objectively defined. The text states that winter ends at the first DTRT maximum, summer is a 'period of constant DTRT values', and SOS/EOS occur at 'inflection points' near 50% of the annual amplitude, but it does not specify how the maximum is located, how constancy or plateau is detected (no tolerance or duration criterion), how inflection points are computed from the GAM fits, or what smoothing parameters are used in the GAM described in Section 2.2. Without these operational definitions, Table 1 and all regional maps in Section 3.2 are not reproducible, and the sensitivity of the boundaries to arbitrary implementation choices cannot be assessed.
  3. [Table 1 and Section 3.1] The reported validation does not support the claim of close alignment. In Table 1, the DTRT-based winter end (WE) is 109/60 DOY for CA and 90/72 DOY for US, while the ground-truth BBCH11 dates are 129 and 125 DOY, respectively — discrepancies of 19–35 days, far larger than the 1–3 day deviations quoted in the text for SOS. The text reports only the SOS deviations and does not acknowledge these WE mismatches, which directly concern the definition of the start of spring. No confidence intervals, standard deviations, or significance tests are provided for any of the date comparisons, so the degree of agreement with phenology is not established quantitatively.
  4. [Section 3.2 and Discussion] The Euro-Mediterranean application lacks validation and uncertainty analysis. The maps in Figures 3–8 are presented descriptively, with qualitative claims about Gulf Stream effects, urban heat islands (Novi Sad, Belgrade, Moscow), and lake moderation, but no quantitative comparison against independent phenological or climatological datasets is given. The paper's own Discussion states that 'the main limitation of this study is that there is a lack of a universally accepted benchmark for validation.' In addition, the DTRT index is undefined when Tavg = 0°C, and the assumed four-season structure with a constant summer plateau may not hold in Mediterranean, alpine, or snow-covered regions; the manuscript does not address how these issues affect the regional maps. Consequently, the quantitative statements about season-length changes (e.g., >30-day reductions in winter) are unsupported.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Abstract] The first sentence contains grammar and word-choice errors: 'Season and their transition' should be 'Seasons and their transitions', and 'sharpening ecosystems' should likely read 'shaping ecosystems'.
  2. [References] References 5 and 6 are identical entries for Cassou and Cattiaux (2016); the duplicate should be removed.
  3. [Section 2.1.3] For the DE site, the text says PEP725 data were used 'for 5 consecutive years' but does not state which years; this should be specified to clarify the averaging period.
  4. [Table 1] The entries '109/60', '90/72', and similar paired values in the DTRT rows are not explained in the caption or text; the authors should indicate whether these are tower and ERA5-based estimates, and how the two numbers should be interpreted.
  5. [Figure 1] The caption should state the units and normalization for each variable (NDVI, EVI, LAI, fPAR, Bowen ratio, DTRT) and describe how the long-term averages were computed; without axis labels or scales, the reader cannot assess the shapes of the curves.
  6. [Section 3.1] The statement that DTRT-based SOS deviates 1–3 days from satellite-based SOS is not traceable from Table 1; the underlying paired dates should be shown explicitly, along with the definition of 'satellite-based SOS' used for comparison.
  7. [Conclusion] The conclusion claims the method works 'even in tropical and subtropical regions', but the study only covers three mid- to high-latitude forest sites and the Euro-Mediterranean region; this claim is not supported by the presented results.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

The DTRT season rule is partly inherited from the authors' prior study, but the core timing validation uses independent phenology data; no full derivation reduces to its own inputs.

  1. ansatz smuggled in via citation [Section 2.3 (Definition of seasons, SOS/EOS rule) applied in Section 3.2 (Euro-Mediterranean maps)]
    "According to ground observations and previous experience with crops and orchards (Lalic et al., 2022), SOS in DTRT time series is set at the first inflection point at approximately 50% of its annual amplitude. ... EOS ... corresponds with DTRT second inflection point at, again, 50% of its annual amplitude."

    The defining 50%-amplitude rule for SOS and EOS is imported from the authors' own prior crop/orchard study, rather than derived or independently re-estimated in this manuscript. All Euro-Mediterranean SOS/EOS maps and the associated 'findings' (advancing SOS, delayed EOS) are computed by applying that same prior rule, so they cannot independently confirm the rule's universality. The paper's validation against PEP725, Harvard Forest, PhenoCam, and MODIS does provide external evidence for the overall timing of DTRT extremes and inflection points, which keeps the circularity partial rather than total.

full rationale

The paper's central empirical claim—that DTRT extremes and inflection points align with phenological markers and ground observations—is tested against independent external data at three FLUXNET sites (PEP725 BBCH data, Harvard Forest records, PhenoCam Gcc, and MODIS NDVI/EVI/LAI/fPAR). Those comparisons are not manufactured by the DTRT definition and give the derivation independent content. The main weakness is that the 50%-amplitude SOS/EOS rule and the constant-summer/constant-winter shape assumptions are inherited from Lalic et al. (2022), a prior study by overlapping authors, and then applied to generate the Euro-Mediterranean maps; the regional 'findings' are therefore outputs of that prior rule rather than a test of it. The manuscript itself acknowledges the lack of a universal benchmark and describes the phenology comparison as indirect validation, which supports a low-score reading rather than a claim of constructed equivalence. No step reduces exactly to its own input by definition; score 2 reflects the partially load-bearing self-citation, not equivalence-by-construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on a small number of explicit choices: a 50% amplitude threshold carried from prior work, an unspecified tolerance for 'constant values', and the assumption that phenological markers are the reference truth for season boundaries. No invention of new physical entities. The regional maps further assume ERA5-Land at 9 km resolution resolves local features such as urban heat islands and lake effects without verification.

free parameters (2)
  • DTRT inflection threshold for SOS/EOS = 50% of annual amplitude
    Set from prior crop/orchard experience (Lalic et al. 2022) and applied to all sites and the Euro-Med mapping; not derived from first principles (Section 2.3).
  • Summer/winter constant-value tolerance = not specified
    The definition of summer as a period of constant DTRT and winter as constant at year end requires an implicit tolerance for slope variation, which is never quantified (Section 2.3).
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Phenological markers (NDVI, EVI, LAI, fPAR, Bowen ratio) are valid ground truth for seasonal transitions.
    The paper uses these markers to define and validate seasons without justifying them as the definitive reference (Sections 2.3, 3.1).
  • ad hoc to paper DTRT extremes and inflection points correspond to biological season transitions at all locations.
    The correspondence is asserted from three forest sites and one crop study, then applied across the Euro-Mediterranean region (Sections 2.3, 3.2).
  • domain assumption ERA5-Land 9 km reanalysis resolves local seasonal features such as urban heat islands and lake effects.
    The paper attributes small-scale features in Figures 3-8 to Gulf Stream, urban heat islands, and lakes without independent verification at that scale (Section 3.2).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Seasonal Changes -- Time for Paradigm Shift." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZXTFLBJK

@misc{pith2026250112882,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Seasonal Changes -- Time for Paradigm Shift},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZXTFLBJK}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.12882}
}
read the original abstract

Season and their transitions play a critical role in sharpening ecosystems and human activities, yet traditional classifications, meteorological and astronomical, fail to capture the complexities of biosphere-atmosphere interactions. Conventional definitions often overlook the interplay between climate variables, biosphere processes, and seasonal anticipation, particularly as global climate change disrupts traditional patterns. This study addresses the limitations of current seasonal classification by proposing a framework based on phenological markers such as NDVI, EVI, LAI, fPAR, and the Bowen ratio, using plants as a nature-based sensor of seasonal transitions. Indicators derived from satellite data and ground observations provide robust foundations for defining seasonal boundaries. The normalized daily temperature range (DTRT), validated in crop and orchard regions, is hypothesized as a reliable seasonality index to capture transitions. We demonstrated the alignment of this index with phenological markers across boreal, temperate, and deciduous forests. Analyzing trends, extreme values and inflection points in the seasonality index time series, we established a methodology to identify seasonal onset, duration, and transitions. This universal, scalable classification aligns with current knowledge and perception of seasonal shifts and captures site-specific timing. Findings reveal shifts in the Euro-Mediterranean region, with winters shortening, summers extending, and transitions becoming more pronounced. Effects include the Gulf Stream s influence on milder transitions, urban heat islands accelerating seasonal shifts, and large inland lakes moderating durations. This underscores the importance of understanding seasonal transitions to enable climate change adaptive strategies in agriculture, forestry, urban planning, medicine, trade, marketing, and tourism.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Redefining Influenza Transmission Seasonality Using the Novel Seasonality Index

    q-bio.QM 2025-01 reject novelty 4.0 of 10

    A temperature-range seasonality index shows only moderate, seasonally confounded correlations with influenza infection rates, and the claimed strong link between winter length and flu oscillation period is contradicte...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 65 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    Barr, A. G. et al. Inter-annual variability in the leaf area index of a boreal aspen-hazelnut forest in relation to net ecosystem production. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 126, 237–255 (2004)

    work page 2004

  2. [2]

    Black, T. A. FLUXNET2015 CA-Oas Saskatchewan - Western Boreal, Mature Aspen. FluxNet; The University of British Columbia https://doi.org/10.18140/FLX/1440043 (2016)

    work page arXiv 2016

  3. [3]

    Blanken, P. D. et al. Energy balance and canopy conductance of a boreal aspen forest: Partitioning overstory and understory components. Journal of Geophysical Research 102, 28915–28927 (1997)

    work page 1997

  4. [4]

    & Peñuelas, J

    Bórnez, K., Descals, A., Verger, A. & Peñuelas, J. Land surface phenology from VEGETATION and PROBA-V data. Assessment over deciduous forests. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation 84, 101974 (2020)

    work page 2020

  5. [6]

    & Cattiaux, J

    Cassou, C. & Cattiaux, J. Disruption of the European climate seasonal clock in a warming world. Nature Climate Change 6, 589–594 (2016)

    work page 2016

  6. [7]

    I., Wang, Y

    Cheng, Y.-B., Zhang, Q., Lyapustin, A. I., Wang, Y. & Middleton, E. M. Impacts of light use efficiency and fPAR parameterization on gross primary production modeling. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 189–190, 187–197 (2014)

    work page 2014

  7. [8]

    E., Chiariello, N

    Cleland, E. E., Chiariello, N. R., Loarie, S. R., Mooney, H. A. & Field, C. B. Diverse responses of phenology to global changes in a grassland ecosystem. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 103, 13740–13744 (2006). 21

    work page 2006

  8. [9]

    & Matzarakis, A

    Cohen, P., Potchter, O. & Matzarakis, A. Daily and seasonal climatic conditions of green urban open spaces in the Mediterranean climate and their impact on human comfort. Building and Environment 51, 285–295 (2012)

    work page 2012

Show all 67 references
  1. [10]

    & Colizza, V

    Coletti, P., Poletto, C., Turbelin, C., Blanchon, T. & Colizza, V. Shifting patterns of seasonal influenza epidemics. Scientific Reports 8, 12786 (2018)

    2018

  2. [11]

    ERA5-Land hourly data from 1950 to present

    Copernicus Climate Change Service. ERA5-Land hourly data from 1950 to present. Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS) https://doi.org/10.24381/CDS.E2161BAC (2019)

    2019 doi

  3. [12]

    Cox, D. T. C., Maclean, I. M. D., Gardner, A. S. & Gaston, K. J. Global variation in diurnal asymmetry in temperature, cloud cover, specific humidity and precipitation and its association with leaf area index. Global Change Biology 26, 7099–7111 (2020)

    2020

  4. [13]

    Crimmins, M. A. & Crimmins, T. M. Does an Early Spring Indicate an Early Summer? Relationships Between Intraseasonal Growing Degree Day Thresholds. Journal of Geophysical Research Biogeosciences 124, 2628–2641 (2019)

    2019

  5. [14]

    Danks, H. V. The elements of seasonal adaptations in insects. The Canadian Entomologist 139, 1–44 (2007)

    2007

  6. [15]

    MODIS/Terra Vegetation Indices 16-Day L3 Global 250m SIN Grid V061

    Didan, K. MODIS/Terra Vegetation Indices 16-Day L3 Global 250m SIN Grid V061. NASA EOSDIS Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD13Q1.061 (2021)

    2021 doi

  7. [16]

    Tree Times: Urban Plants as Timekeepers and Seasonal Indicators

    Dümpelmann, S. Tree Times: Urban Plants as Timekeepers and Seasonal Indicators. Journal of Urban History 51, 48–60 (2025)

    2025

  8. [17]

    R., Acevedo, O

    Fitzjarrald, D. R., Acevedo, O. C. & Moore, K. E. Climatic Consequences of Leaf Presence in the Eastern United States. Journal of Climate 14, 598–614 (2001)

    2001

  9. [18]

    & Neidell, M

    Graff Zivin, J. & Neidell, M. Temperature and the Allocation of Time: Implications for Climate Change. Journal of Labor Economics 32, 1–26 (2014)

    2014

  10. [19]

    Hanes, J. M. Spring leaf phenology and the diurnal temperature range in a temperate maple forest. International Journal of Biometeorology 58, 103–108 (2014)

    2014

  11. [20]

    Harp, R. D. & Karnauskas, K. B. The Influence of Interannual Climate Variability on Regional Violent Crime Rates in the United States. GeoHealth 2, 356–369 (2018)

    2018

  12. [21]

    Hedquist, B. C. & Brazel, A. J. Seasonal variability of temperatures and outdoor human comfort in Phoenix, Arizona, U.S.A. Building and Environment 72, 377–388 (2014)

    2014

  13. [22]

    D., Webber, P

    Hollister, R. D., Webber, P. J. & Bay, C. Plant response to temperature in northern Alaska: implications for predicting vegetation change. Ecology 86, 1562–1570 (2005)

    2005

  14. [23]

    & Guo, L

    Huang, Y., Jiang, N., Shen, M. & Guo, L. Effect of preseason diurnal temperature range on the start of vegetation growing season in the Northern Hemisphere. Ecological Indicators 112, 106161 (2020)

    2020

  15. [24]

    Huete, A. et al. Overview of the radiometric and biophysical performance of the MODIS vegetation indices. Remote Sensing of Environment 83, 195–213 (2002)

    2002

  16. [25]

    Hufkens, K., Basler, D., Milliman, T., Melaas, E. K. & Richardson, A. D. An integrated phenology modelling framework in R. Methods in Ecology and Evolution 9, 1276–1285 (2018)

    2018

  17. [26]

    & Kéry, M

    Jenni, L. & Kéry, M. Timing of autumn bird migration under climate change: advances in long–distance migrants, delays in short–distance migrants. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 270, 1467–1471 (2003). 22

    2003

  18. [27]

    Jylhä, K. et al. Observed and Projected Future Shifts of Climatic Zones in Europe and Their Use to Visualize Climate Change Information. Weather, Climate, and Society 2, 148–167 (2010)

    2010

  19. [28]

    Kirbyshire, A. L. & Bigg, G. R. Is the onset of the English summer advancing? Climatic Change 100, 419–431 (2010)

    2010

  20. [29]

    Kozlov, M. V. & Berlina, N. G. Decline in Length of the Summer Season on the Kola Peninsula, Russia. Climatic Change 54, 387–398 (2002)

    2002

  21. [30]

    Kuglitsch, F. G. et al. Heat wave changes in the eastern Mediterranean since 1960. Geophysical Research Letters 37, 2009GL041841 (2010)

    2010

  22. [31]

    Kwiecien, O. et al. What we talk about when we talk about seasonality – A transdisciplinary review. Earth-Science Reviews 225, 103843 (2022)

    2022

  23. [32]

    R., Firanj Sremac, A., Marčić, M

    Lalić, B., Fitzjarrald, D. R., Firanj Sremac, A., Marčić, M. & Petrić, M. Identifying Crop and Orchard Growing Stages Using Conventional Temperature and Humidity Reports. Atmosphere 13, 700 (2022)

    2022

  24. [33]

    & Jones, I

    Littleboy, C., Subke, J.-A., Bunnefeld, N. & Jones, I. L. WorldSeasons: a seasonal classification system interpolating biome classifications within the year for better temporal aggregation in climate science. Scientific Data 11, 927 (2024)

    2024

  25. [34]

    B., Schlenker, W

    Lobell, D. B., Schlenker, W. & Costa-Roberts, J. Climate Trends and Global Crop Production Since 1980. Science 333, 616–620 (2011)

    2011

  26. [35]

    Growth stages of mono- and dicotyledonous plants: BBCH Monograph

    Meier, U. Growth stages of mono- and dicotyledonous plants: BBCH Monograph. (2018) doi:10.5073/20180906-074619

    2018 doi

  27. [36]

    Menzel, A. et al. European phenological response to climate change matches the warming pattern. Global Change Biology 12, 1969–1976 (2006)

    2006

  28. [37]

    J., Bunce, R

    Metzger, M. J., Bunce, R. G. H., Jongman, R. H. G., Mücher, C. A. & Watkins, J. W. A climatic stratification of the environment of Europe. Global Ecology and Biogeography 14, 549–563 (2005)

    2005

  29. [38]

    & Park, T

    Myneni, R., Knyazikhin, Y. & Park, T. MODIS/Terra Leaf Area Index/FPAR 8-Day L4 Global 500m SIN Grid V061. NASA EOSDIS Land Processes Distributed Active Archive Center https://doi.org/10.5067/MODIS/MOD15A2H.061 (2021)

    2021 doi

  30. [39]

    Obradovich, N., Migliorini, R., Paulus, M. P. & Rahwan, I. Empirical evidence of mental health risks posed by climate change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 115, 10953–10958 (2018)

    2018

  31. [40]

    Parker, G. G. Tamm review: Leaf Area Index (LAI) is both a determinant and a consequence of important processes in vegetation canopies. Forest Ecology and Management 477, 118496 (2020)

    2020

  32. [41]

    Ecological and Evolutionary Responses to Recent Climate Change

    Parmesan, C. Ecological and Evolutionary Responses to Recent Climate Change. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 37, 637–669 (2006)

    2006

  33. [42]

    Pastorello, G. et al. The FLUXNET2015 dataset and the ONEFlux processing pipeline for eddy covariance data. Scientific Data 7, 225 (2020)

    2020

  34. [43]

    & García-Herrera, R

    Peña-Ortiz, C., Barriopedro, D. & García-Herrera, R. Multidecadal Variability of the Summer Length in Europe. Journal of Climate 28, 5375–5388 (2015)

    2015

  35. [44]

    & Filella, I

    Peñuelas, J. & Filella, I. Responses to a Warming World. Science 294, 793–795 (2001)

    2001

  36. [45]

    S., Pedersen, C., Wilmers, C

    Post, E. S., Pedersen, C., Wilmers, C. C. & Forchhammer, M. C. Phenological sequences reveal aggregate life history response to climatic warming. Ecology 89, 363–370 (2008). 23

    2008

  37. [46]

    C., White, M

    Reed, B. C., White, M. & Brown, J. F. Remote Sensing Phenology. in Phenology: An Integrative Environmental Science (ed. Schwartz, M. D.) vol. 39 365–381 (Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, 2003)

    2003

  38. [47]

    Rintamäki, R. et al. Seasonal Changes in Mood and Behavior Are Linked to Metabolic Syndrome. PLoS ONE 3, e1482 (2008)

    2008

  39. [48]

    & Räisänen, P

    Ruosteenoja, K. & Räisänen, P. Seasonal Changes in Solar Radiation and Relative Humidity in Europe in Response to Global Warming. Journal of Climate 26, 2467–2481 (2013)

    2013

  40. [49]

    D., Ahas, R

    Schwartz, M. D., Ahas, R. & Aasa, A. Onset of spring starting earlier across the Northern Hemisphere. Global Change Biology 12, 343–351 (2006)

    2006

  41. [50]

    Scott, D., Hall, C. M. & Stefan, G. Tourism and Climate Change. (Routledge, 2012). doi:10.4324/9780203127490

    2012 doi

  42. [51]

    Seyednasrollah, B. et al. Vegetation CollectionPhenoCam Dataset v2.0: Vegetation Phenology from Digital Camera Imagery, 2000-2018. 0 MB Preprint at https://doi.org/10.3334/ORNLDAAC/1674 (2019)

    2019 doi

  43. [52]

    Sherry, R. A. et al. Divergence of reproductive phenology under climate warming. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 104, 198–202 (2007)

    2007

  44. [53]

    Soudani, K. et al. Ground-based Network of NDVI measurements for tracking temporal dynamics of canopy structure and vegetation phenology in different biomes. Remote Sensing of Environment 123, 234–245 (2012)

    2012

  45. [54]

    Sparks, T. H. & Menzel, A. Observed changes in seasons: an overview. International Journal of Climatology 22, 1715–1725 (2002)

    2002

  46. [55]

    R., Huybers, P

    Stine, A. R., Huybers, P. & Fung, I. Y. Changes in the phase of the annual cycle of surface temperature. Nature 457, 435–440 (2009)

    2009

  47. [56]

    Templ, B. et al. Pan European Phenological database (PEP725): a single point of access for European data. International Journal of Biometeorology 62, 1109–1113 (2018)

    2018

  48. [57]

    Thomson, D. J. Shifts in season. Nature 457, 391–392 (2009)

    2009

  49. [58]

    Trenberth, K. E. What are the Seasons? Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society 64, 1276–1282 (1983)

    1983

  50. [59]

    & Guzik, I

    Twardosz, R., Walanus, A. & Guzik, I. Warming in Europe: Recent Trends in Annual and Seasonal temperatures. Pure and Applied Geophysics 178, 4021–4032 (2021)

    2021

  51. [60]

    Van Buskirk, J., Mulvihill, R. S. & Leberman, R. C. Variable shifts in spring and autumn migration phenology in North American songbirds associated with climate change. Global Change Biology 15, 760–771 (2009)

    2009

  52. [61]

    & Peñuelas, J

    Verger, A., Filella, I., Baret, F. & Peñuelas, J. Vegetation baseline phenology from kilometric global LAI satellite products. Remote Sensing of Environment 178, 1–14 (2016)

    2016

  53. [62]

    Wang, C. et al. Analysis of Differences in Phenology Extracted from the Enhanced Vegetation Index and the Leaf Area Index. Sensors 17, 1982 (2017)

    2017

  54. [63]

    Wang, J. et al. Changing Lengths of the Four Seasons by Global Warming. Geophysical Research Letters 48, e2020GL091753 (2021)

    2021

  55. [64]

    & Liu, D

    Wang, J. & Liu, D. Larger diurnal temperature range undermined later autumn leaf senescence with warming in Europe. Global Ecology and Biogeography 32, 734–746 (2023). 24

    2023

  56. [65]

    Wood, S. N. Fast Stable Restricted Maximum Likelihood and Marginal Likelihood Estimation of Semiparametric Generalized Linear Models. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B: Statistical Methodology 73, 3–36 (2011)

    2011

  57. [66]

    Wood, S. N. Generalized Additive Models: An Introduction with R. (Chapman and Hall/CRC, 2017). doi:10.1201/9781315370279

    2017 doi

  58. [67]

    Wu, C. et al. Land surface phenology derived from normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) at global FLUXNET sites. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 233, 171– 182 (2017)

    2017

  59. [68]

    & Rouault, M

    Zorita, E., Hünicke, B., Tim, N. & Rouault, M. Past Climate Variability in the Last Millennium. in Sustainability of Southern African Ecosystems under Global Change (eds. Von Maltitz, G. P. et al.) vol. 248 133–147 (Springer International Publishing, Cham, 2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.