Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 142 references

"It was Mentally Painful to Try and Stop": Design Opportunities for Just-in-Time Interventions for People with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in the Real World

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read OCD self-management tech should be built around trigger properties and the risk that coping strategies become new compulsions.

desk verdict A careful, transparent need-finding study on OCD triggers and self-management, with a strong design-oriented contribution that slightly overstates its headline property-vs-type claim. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.13308 v2 pith:SQVI4T7L submitted 2025-01-23 cs.HC

Ru Wang , Kexin Zhang , Yuqing Wang , Keri Brown , Yuhang Zhao This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.HC
keywords OCDobsessive-compulsivedisorderjust-in-timeinterventiontriggerpropertiesexposureandresponsepreventionacceptancecommitmenttherapymentalcompulsionsself-managementtechnology
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that just-in-time technology for obsessive-compulsive disorder has been built on an incomplete picture of what actually triggers and sustains symptoms. Drawing on interviews with ten people with OCD and seven OCD therapists, it shows that a trigger's type matters less than its properties—such as a trash can's fullness, a stain's color contrast, a knife's proximity, or whether a familiar person is involved. The paper also finds that the coping strategies people with OCD use in daily life can directly conflict with therapist recommendations, notably relaxation techniques that professionals caution can harden into a new compulsion. If this picture is right, future interventions should detect trigger properties rather than generic trigger checklists, and treat mental compulsions as a distinct and critical monitoring target.

What carries the argument

The conceptual engine is the distinction between a trigger's type and its properties: the authors argue that properties such as fullness, color contrast, texture, proximity, quantity, pose, and familiarity determine how distressing a trigger is, and that this property-level analysis should drive both detection and intervention design. A second mechanism is the staged view of an OCD episode, in which the authors map coping strategies to different moments—accepting and challenging obsessive thoughts, resisting compulsions through exposure, tapering compulsions, and using distraction or relaxation as a safety net—and then use the observed conflicts between patient practice and therapist guidance to define what feedback a just-in-time system should and should not deliver.

What would settle it

A pre-registered field study with a larger, more severe, and non-US sample that codes both trigger type and candidate properties (e.g., fullness, color contrast, proximity) and compares their predictive power for individual distress ratings could settle the property-over-type claim: if trigger type alone predicts distress as well as properties do, the framing would be falsified. Likewise, a longitudinal trial of app-delivered relaxation techniques that finds no increase in compulsions would weaken the paper's concern that relaxation can become a new compulsion.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that OCD self-management in the real world is misaligned with current technology because both trigger recognition and intervention feedback are modeled on the wrong units. Based on qualitative analysis of patient and therapist interviews, the authors establish two headline findings: first, trigger intensity is governed by fine-grained properties of triggers—sensory attributes, affordances, spatial attributes, familiarity, and internal state—not by the object category itself; second, the coping strategies people adopt (e.g., breathing, distraction, reassurance logging, exposure practice) sometimes work well but also sometimes contradict professional guidance, and when they do, technology that uncritically reinforces them can make OCD worse. The authors therefore propose design opportunities for personalized, property-aware symptom tracking, just-in-time interventions that support exposure and resistance without becoming new compulsions, and privacy and social features specific to OCD.

Load-bearing premise

The design opportunities assume that the experiences of ten self-selected, English-speaking US participants with mild-to-moderate OCD, plus seven OCD therapists, adequately represent the heterogeneity of OCD triggers, compulsion patterns, and management needs across the broader OCD population.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Just-in-time OCD interventions should sense trigger properties, not just recognize objects, using multimodal data (e.g., object fullness, color contrast, proximity, sound) and should let users specify personalized trigger hierarchies with fine-grained intensity levels.
  • Intervention feedback should be carefully matched to the stage of an episode and should avoid reinforcing relaxation or distraction as the primary response, since these can become compulsions unless guided with exposure principles.
  • Mental compulsions (rumination, internal counting, self-reassurance) need to be treated as a distinct detection target because physical compulsion reduction can be compensated by covert mental rituals.
  • Symptom tracking tools should be personalized, automatic, and privacy-preserving, with obfuscation of sensitive visual and textual data, since fear of data exposure can block adoption.
  • Technology-supported interventions should include a wind-down feature that gradually reduces reliance on the tool, avoiding the tool itself becoming a safety behavior or an avoidance strategy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the property-over-type finding replicates across larger and more severe samples, it would suggest that clinical exposure hierarchies should be built not only by listing trigger objects but by systematically varying the properties that modulate intensity, and that standard checklist instruments could be complemented by property-level ratings.
  • The therapist caution about relaxation techniques implies that app-delivered breathing or grounding exercises, popular in general mental health apps, could backfire for a subset of OCD users; a longitudinal experiment could test whether relaxation prompts increase later compulsion urges.
  • The finding that familiarity can intensify or dampen triggers depending on OCD subtype suggests a testable personalization variable for predictive models: a user-specific familiarity weight for each trigger, which could improve distress prediction.
  • The proposed wind-down strategy for technology reliance is a testable design principle for any assistive mental-health tool: intervention frequency should taper over time to help users internalize coping skills rather than depend on the device.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a semi-structured interview study with 10 people with mild-to-moderate OCD and 7 OCD therapists to understand triggers, compulsions, coping strategies, and technology needs, and derives design opportunities for just-in-time interventions. It claims that OCD triggers are highly individualized and that specific trigger properties (e.g., fullness of a trash can, lid presence, color contrast, texture, proximity, familiarity) rather than trigger types predominantly shape distress; that coping strategies can conflict with therapist recommendations (e.g., relaxation techniques that may become a new compulsion); and that existing symptom tracking lacks personalization, privacy protection, and support for mental compulsions. The analysis uses a hybrid inductive/deductive thematic approach, with over 700 codes and 20 themes, and the paper includes detailed participant tables, quotes, a reflexivity statement, and an explicit limitation section.

Significance. If the central claims are appropriately moderated, this is a useful need-finding contribution for just-in-time OCD intervention design. The study's strengths include a transparently reported recruitment and analysis procedure, the inclusion of both people with OCD and OCD professionals, explicit attention to researcher positionality, and an honest limitations section. The paper ships no equations or fitted parameters; the design opportunities are presented as extrapolations for future implementation, which is appropriate for a qualitative HCI need-finding study. The most distinctive potential contributions are the shift from object-level to property-level trigger characterization, the identification of mental compulsions as a distinct detection target, and the documented tension between client coping strategies and therapist recommendations, particularly around relaxation techniques.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section 3.2, Section 4.1.2, Abstract] The headline finding that trigger properties, rather than trigger types, "predominantly" affect user experience is not securely grounded because the interview protocol explicitly prompted for fine-grained trigger characteristics. Section 3.2 states that "for triggers, we specifically asked for fine-grained details with a goal of identifying the characteristics and rationales of the triggers." The prevalence of property-based descriptions in the data may therefore reflect the elicitation procedure rather than the relative importance of properties over object types in participants' experience. The Abstract's "predominantly" and Section 4.1.2's "Trigger Intensity: Properties over Objects" heading state the claim more strongly than the evidence supports; the section text itself wavers to "it was often the specific properties of the object." This issue is load-bearing because the design opportunities in Section 5.1.2 (fine-grained symptom formulation and property-based exposure hierarchies) derive directly from this finding. Please moderate the claim to something like "participants frequently described specific properties as important to trigger intensity," add an explicit discussion of how the targeted prompting may have shaped responses, and, where possible, report whether property descriptions also arose in unprompted parts of the interviews.
  2. [Section 3.1.1, Table A.1, Section 6] The generalizability of the main findings is constrained by the sample: 10 self-selected, English-speaking, US-based participants with mild-to-moderate OCD, with a concentration of contamination and responsibility themes (six and five participants, respectively, in Table A.1) and only one participant with harm/sexual OCD and two with just-right OCD. While Section 6 appropriately acknowledges the exclusion of severe OCD and less common themes, the paper's broader framing still generalizes from this sample to people with OCD in general. The abstract and Section 4.1.2 should therefore present the property-over-type finding and the derived design opportunities as provisional for the studied sample, not as validated guidelines for the full heterogeneity of OCD. This is not a request for a different study; it is a request to align the strength of the claims with the evidence actually collected.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 3.2, Section 3.3] Please include the full interview protocol and the two codebooks as supplemental material; the analysis procedure is described in detail, but the absence of the actual instruments limits transparency and reproducibility.
  2. [Section 1] The claim of contributing "the first interview study" is an overclaim; recommend changing it to "to our knowledge, the first interview study" or otherwise softening the absolute phrasing.
  3. [Table 2, Section 4.4.1] There are minor typos: "axiety disorder" in Table 2 should be "anxiety disorder," and "therpy" in Section 4.4.1 should be "therapy."
  4. [Section 4.2.1] The three criteria for distinguishing compulsive behaviors are each attributed to a small subset of therapists (T1; T5-T7; T7); please report the level of consensus more explicitly so readers can gauge how established these criteria are within the professional sample.
  5. [Section 4.1.2] The presentation of trigger properties would benefit from prevalence information; the current text gives illustrative examples from specific participants (P1, P2, P3, P7, P8) without indicating how many participants mentioned each property category, which makes it harder to judge the robustness of each sub-finding.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is a qualitative interview study whose design opportunities are extrapolated from transcripts, not predicted from fitted parameters or self-cited derivations.

full rationale

This paper is an empirical, qualitative need-finding study. It contains no equations, fitted parameters, or quantitative predictions. The central findings—that trigger properties rather than trigger types predominantly shape distress, and that some coping strategies conflict with therapist recommendations—are thematic interpretations of interview data. The analysis is documented as a hybrid inductive/deductive thematic analysis with two coders and codebook reconciliation (Section 3.3), and the paper discloses its sample limitations (Section 6). The skeptical concern about a prompting artifact (Section 3.2 explicitly asked for 'fine-grained details' about trigger characteristics) is a validity and generalizability concern, not a circularity concern under the definitions used here: the paper does not define its finding in terms of its interview protocol, nor does it fit a parameter and then rename the fit as a prediction. The design opportunities in Section 5 are explicitly framed as implications of the interviews, not as validated predictions. Self-citations are absent and no cited 'uniqueness' or 'first-principles' theorem is invoked. Accordingly, no circular step can be exhibited, and the appropriate score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The study has no fitted parameters or invented entities. It relies on standard qualitative assumptions: self-report accuracy, sample representativeness, and the validity of thematic analysis. These are domain assumptions, not formal axioms.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Participants' self-reports of triggers, compulsions, and coping strategies accurately reflect their real-world OCD experiences.
    The findings rest on interview recall and subjective ratings (such as trigger intensity and distress), as described in Sections 3.2 and 4.1.2; the study does not include objective behavioral observation or sensor data.
  • domain assumption A sample of 10 self-selected people with mild-to-moderate OCD and 7 US-based therapists is sufficient to identify transferable design themes across OCD subtypes.
    The paper acknowledges in Sections 3.1.1 and 6 that severe OCD, non-English speakers, and less common themes are excluded; this assumption is load-bearing for the claimed general design implications.
  • domain assumption The hybrid inductive/deductive thematic analysis and two-researcher codebook reconciliation yield valid themes.
    Thematic analysis is an interpretive method described in Section 3.3; its validity depends on coding procedures, which are described but not fully auditable because codebooks and transcripts are not included.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of "It was Mentally Painful to Try and Stop": Design Opportunities for Just-in-Time Interventions for People with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in the Real World." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SQVI4T7L

@misc{pith2026250113308,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: "It was Mentally Painful to Try and Stop": Design Opportunities for Just-in-Time Interventions for People with Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder in the Real World},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SQVI4T7L}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.13308}
}
read the original abstract

Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a mental health condition that significantly impacts people's quality of life. While evidence-based therapies such as exposure and response prevention (ERP) can be effective, managing OCD symptoms in everyday life -- an essential part of treatment and independent living -- remains challenging due to fear confrontation and lack of appropriate support. To better understand the challenges and needs in OCD self-management, we conducted interviews with 10 participants with diverse OCD conditions and seven therapists specializing in OCD treatment. Through these interviews, we explored the characteristics of participants' triggers and how they shaped their compulsions, and uncovered key coping strategies across different stages of OCD episodes. Our findings highlight critical gaps between OCD self-management needs and currently available support. Building on these insights, we propose design opportunities for just-in-time self-management technologies for OCD, including personalized symptom tracking, just-in-time interventions, and support for OCD-specific privacy and social needs -- through technology and beyond.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.13308 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Fine-Grained Symptom Formulation: an example of the user specifying triggers and trigger properties to build [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_1.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

142 extracted references · 64 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Jonathan S Abramowitz, Brett J Deacon, Bunmi O Olatunji, Michael G Wheaton, Noah C Berman, Diane Losardo, Kiara R Timpano, Patrick B McGrath, Bradley C Riemann, Thomas Adams, et al. 2010. Assessment of obsessive-compulsive symp- tom dimensions: development and evaluation of the Dimensional Obsessive- Compulsive Scale. Psychological assessment 22, 1 (2010), 180

    2010

  2. [2]

    Shourya Aggarwal, Divyanshu Mandowara, Vishwajeet Agrawal, Dinesh Khan- delwal, Parag Singla, and Dinesh Garg. 2021. Explanations for commonsenseqa: New dataset and models. In Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Asso- ciation for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long ...

    2021

  3. [3]

    Candice A Alfano and Kerri L Kim. 2011. Objective sleep patterns and severity of symptoms in pediatric obsessive compulsive disorder: a pilot investigation. Journal of anxiety disorders 25, 6 (2011), 835–839

    2011

  4. [4]

    DSMTF American Psychiatric Association, American Psychiatric Association, et al. 2013. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders: DSM-5 . Vol. 5. American psychiatric association Washington, DC

    2013

  5. [5]

    Vitica X Arnold and Sean D Young. 2025. The Potential of Wearable Sensors for Detecting Cognitive Rumination: A Scoping Review. Sensors 25, 3 (2025), 654

    2025

  6. [6]

    American Psychiatric Association. 2024. Psychiatry.org - What Is Obsessive- Compulsive Disorder? Available online at: https://www.psychiatry.org/patients- families/obsessive-compulsive-disorder/what-is-obsessive-compulsive- disorder, last accessed on 4/16/2024

    2024

  7. [7]

    Ali Baioui, Juliane Pilgramm, Christian J Merz, Bertram Walter, Dieter Vaitl, and Rudolf Stark. 2013. Neural response in obsessive-compulsive washers depends on individual fit of triggers. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience 7 (2013), 143

    2013

  8. [8]

    Susan G Ball, Lee Baer, and Michael W Otto. 1996. Symptom subtypes of obsessive-compulsive disorder in behavioral treatment studies: A quantitative review. Behaviour Research and Therapy 34, 1 (1996), 47–51

    1996

Show all 142 references
  1. [9]

    Judith S Beck. 2011. Cognitive-behavioral therapy. Clinical textbook of addictive disorders 491 (2011), 474–501

    2011

  2. [10]

    Dror Ben-Zeev, Christopher J Brenner, Mark Begale, Jennifer Duffecy, David C Mohr, and Kim T Mueser. 2014. Feasibility, acceptability, and preliminary efficacy of a smartphone intervention for schizophrenia. Schizophrenia bulletin 40, 6 (2014), 1244–1253

    2014

  3. [11]

    Dror Ben-Zeev, Susan M Kaiser, Christopher J Brenner, Mark Begale, Jennifer Duffecy, and David C Mohr. 2013. Development and usability testing of FO- CUS: a smartphone system for self-management of schizophrenia. Psychiatric rehabilitation journal 36, 4 (2013), 289

    2013

  4. [12]

    Thröstur Björgvinsson, John Hart, and Susan Heffelfinger. 2007. Obsessive- compulsive disorder: update on assessment and treatment.Journal of Psychiatric Practice® 13, 6 (2007), 362–372

    2007

  5. [13]

    Shannon M Blakey, Lillian Reuman, Ryan J Jacoby, and Jonathan S Abramowitz

  6. [14]

    J Bobes, MP González, MT Bascaran, C Arango, PA Sáiz, and Ml Bousono. 2001. Quality of life and disability in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder. European psychiatry 16, 4 (2001), 239–245

    2001

  7. [15]

    Christina L Boisseau, Carly M Schwartzman, Jessica Lawton, and Maria C Mancebo. 2017. App-guided exposure and response prevention for obsessive compulsive disorder: an open pilot trial. Cognitive Behaviour Therapy 46, 6 (2017), 447–458

    2017

  8. [16]

    Florian Bordes, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Anurag Ajay, Alexander C Li, Adrien Bardes, Suzanne Petryk, Oscar Mañas, Zhiqiu Lin, Anas Mahmoud, Bargav Jayaraman, et al. 2024. An introduction to vision-language modeling. arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.17247 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  9. [17]

    R Boyatzis. 1998. Transforming qualitative information: Thematic analysis and code development. Sage

    1998

  10. [18]

    Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke. 2006. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative research in psychology 3, 2 (2006), 77–101

    2006

  11. [19]

    Lily A Brown, Kevin Narine, Anu Asnaani, Savannah Simon, Ifrah Majeed, and Daniel Cohen. 2020. Implementation of technology-driven comprehensive physical health assessment in an anxiety specialty clinic: Preliminary pilot study findings. The Behavior Therapist (2020)

    2020

  12. [20]

    Robin Burchard, Philipp M Scholl, Roselind Lieb, Kristof Van Laerhoven, and Karina Wahl. 2022. WashSpot: Real-Time Spotting and Detection of Enacted Compulsive Hand Washing with Wearable Devices. InAdjunct Proceedings of the 2022 ACM International Joint Conference on Pervasive...

    2022

  13. [21]

    Michelle Nicole Burns, Mark Begale, Jennifer Duffecy, Darren Gergle, Chris J Karr, Emily Giangrande, and David C Mohr. 2011. Harnessing context sensing to develop a mobile intervention for depression. Journal of medical Internet research 13, 3 (2011), e1838

    2011

  14. [22]

    Calm. 2024. Calm - The #1 App for Meditation and Sleep. Available online at: https://www.calm.com, last accessed on 8/24/2024

    2024

  15. [23]

    Siow Ann Chong, Edimansyah Abdin, Cathy Sherbourne, J Vaingankar, Derrick Heng, Mabel Yap, and Mythily Subramaniam. 2012. Treatment gap in common mental disorders: the Singapore perspective. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 21, 2 (2012), 195–202

    2012

  16. [24]

    Victoria Clarke, Virginia Braun, and Nikki Hayfield. 2015. Thematic analysis. Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to research methods 222 (2015), 248

    2015

  17. [25]

    ME Coles, J Schubert, E Stewart, KM Sharkey, and M Deak. 2020. Sleep duration and timing in obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD): evidence for circadian phase delay. Sleep Medicine 72 (2020), 111–117

    2020

  18. [26]

    Jean Costa, Alexander T Adams, Malte F Jung, François Guimbretière, and Tanzeem Choudhury. 2016. EmotionCheck: leveraging bodily signals and false feedback to regulate our emotions. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM international joint conference on pervasive and ubiquitous compu...

    2016

  19. [27]

    Jean Costa, François Guimbretière, Malte F Jung, and Tanzeem Choudhury. 2019. Boostmeup: Improving cognitive performance in the moment by unobtrusively regulating emotions with a smartwatch. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 3,...

    2019

  20. [28]

    Rebecca C Cox and Bunmi O Olatunji. 2022. Delayed circadian rhythms and insomnia symptoms in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Journal of affective disorders 318 (2022), 94–102

    2022

  21. [29]

    Benjamin F Crabtree and William F Miller. 1992. A template approach to text analysis: developing and using codebooks. (1992)

    1992

  22. [30]

    James J Cummings, Tiernan J Cahill, Erin Wertz, and Qiankun Zhong. 2023. Psychological predictors of consumer-level virtual reality technology adoption and usage. Virtual Reality 27, 2 (2023), 1357–1379

    2023

  23. [31]

    Ruixuan Dai, Chenyang Lu, Linda Yun, Eric Lenze, Michael Avidan, and Thomas Kannampallil. 2021. Comparing stress prediction models using smartwatch phys- iological signals and participant self-reports. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine 208 (2021), 106207

    2021

  24. [32]

    Lynne M Drummond, Katharina Wulff, R Shashi Rani, Sarah White, Josephine Mbanga-Sibanda, Hamid Ghodse, and Naomi A Fineberg. 2012. How should we measure delayed sleep phase shift in severe, refractory obsessive-compulsive Design Opportunities for Just-in-Time OCD Intervention ...

    2012

  25. [33]

    Kamryn T Eddy, Lissa Dutra, Rebekah Bradley, and Drew Westen. 2004. A multidimensional meta-analysis of psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder. Clinical psychology review 24, 8 (2004), 1011– 1030

    2004

  26. [34]

    Jane L Eisen, Maria A Mancebo, Anthony Pinto, Meredith E Coles, Maria E Pagano, Robert Stout, and Steven A Rasmussen. 2006. Impact of obsessive- compulsive disorder on quality of life. Comprehensive psychiatry 47, 4 (2006), 270–275

    2006

  27. [35]

    Kelsey J Evey and Shari A Steinman. 2023. A Systematic Review of the Use of Ac- ceptance and Commitment Therapy (ACT) to Treat Adult Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder (OCD). Behavior Therapy (2023)

    2023

  28. [36]

    Xiaoli Fan, Chaoyi Zhao, Xin Zhang, Hong Luo, and Wei Zhang. 2020. Assess- ment of mental workload based on multi-physiological signals. Technology and Health Care 28, S1 (2020), 67–80

    2020

  29. [37]

    Florian Ferreri, Alexis Bourla, Charles-Siegfried Peretti, Tomoyuki Segawa, Nemat Jaafari, Stéphane Mouchabac, et al. 2019. How new technologies can im- prove prediction, assessment, and intervention in obsessive-compulsive disorder (e-OCD). JMIR Mental Health 6, 12 (2019), e11643

    2019

  30. [38]

    Jamie D Feusner, Patrick B McGrath, Ted Faneuff, Stephanie Lonsway, Reza Mohideen, Larry Trusky, and Stephen M Smith. 2021. Initial Clinical Outcomes from NOCD Digital Behavioral Health Treatment of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder Using Exposure and Response Prevention. medRxiv ...

    2021

  31. [39]

    Adam C Frank, Ruibei Li, Bradley S Peterson, and Shrikanth S Narayanan

  32. [40]

    Gemma García-Soriano, Michael Rufer, Aba Delsignore, and Steffi Weidt. 2014. Factors associated with non-treatment or delayed treatment seeking in OCD sufferers: a review of the literature. Psychiatry research 220, 1-2 (2014), 1–10

    2014

  33. [41]

    Wayne K Goodman, Lawrence H Price, Steven A Rasmussen, Carolyn Mazure, Roberta L Fleischmann, Candy L Hill, George R Heninger, and Dennis S Charney

  34. [42]

    Qiming Guo, Jinwen Tang, Wenbo Sun, Haoteng Tang, Yi Shang, and Wenlu Wang. 2024. SouLLMate: An Application Enhancing Diverse Mental Health Support with Adaptive LLMs, Prompt Engineering, and RAG Techniques. arXiv preprint arXiv:2410.16322 (2024)

    2024

  35. [43]

    David H Gustafson, Fiona M McTavish, Ming-Yuan Chih, Amy K Atwood, Roberta A Johnson, Michael G Boyle, Michael S Levy, Hilary Driscoll, Steven M Chisholm, Lisa Dillenburg, et al. 2014. A smartphone application to support recovery from alcoholism: a randomized clinical trial. J...

    2014

  36. [44]

    Gabriella M Harari. 2020. A process-oriented approach to respecting privacy in the context of mobile phone tracking. Current opinion in psychology 31 (2020), 141–147

    2020

  37. [45]

    Sheng He, Hao Zeng, Mengru Xue, Guanghui Huang, Cheng Yao, and Fangtian Ying. 2024. Affective Stroking: Design Thermal Mid-Air Tactile for Assisting People in Stress Regulation. Applied Sciences 14, 20 (2024), 9494

    2024

  38. [46]

    Dianne M Hezel and H Blair Simpson. 2019. Exposure and response prevention for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A review and new directions. Indian journal of psychiatry 61, Suppl 1 (2019), S85–S92

    2019

  39. [47]

    Matthew E Hirschtritt, Michael H Bloch, and Carol A Mathews. 2017. Obsessive- compulsive disorder: advances in diagnosis and treatment. Jama 317, 13 (2017), 1358–1367

    2017

  40. [48]

    Khoa C Hoang, Wesley P Chan, Steven Lay, Akansel Cosgun, and Elizabeth Croft

  41. [49]

    Natalie Hong, Amanda L Sanchez, and Jonathan S Comer. 2020. Multimedia FIeld Test: Can users strike out OCD with the NOCD app? Cognitive and Behavioral Practice 27, 1 (2020), 93–99

    2020

  42. [50]

    Md Imran Hossain, Ghada Zamzmi, Peter R Mouton, Md Sirajus Salekin, Yu Sun, and Dmitry Goldgof. 2023. Explainable AI for Medical Data: Current Methods, Limitations, and Future Directions. Comput. Surveys (2023)

    2023

  43. [51]

    Shanshan Huang, Fuxiang Fu, Ke Yang, Ke Zhang, and Fan Yang. 2024. Empow- erment of Large Language Models in Psychological Counseling through Prompt Engineering. In 2024 IEEE 4th International Conference on Software Engineering and Artificial Intelligence (SEAI). IEEE, 220–225

    2024

  44. [52]

    Zainab Iftikhar, Sean Ransom, Amy Xiao, and Jeff Huang. 2024. Therapy as an NLP Task: Psychologists’ Comparison of LLMs and Human Peers in CBT. arXiv preprint arXiv:2409.02244 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Ozlem Durmaz Incel and Sevda Özge Bursa. 2023. On-device deep learning for mobile and wearable sensing applications: A review. IEEE Sensors Journal 23, 6 (2023), 5501–5512

    2023

  46. [54]

    IOCDF. 2024. International OCD Foundation | Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD). Available online at: https://iocdf.org, last accessed on 8/16/2024

    2024

  47. [55]

    Chelsea Kelling, Daniella Pitaro, and Jussi Rantala. 2016. Good vibes: the im- pact of haptic patterns on stress levels. In Proceedings of the 20th International Academic Mindtrek Conference. 130–136

    2016

  48. [56]

    Vassilis-Javed Khan, Panos Markopoulos, and Nynke Spijksma. 2011. On the use of pervasive computing to support patients with obsessive compulsive disorder. In CHI’11 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1213–1218

    2011

  49. [57]

    Mina J Kian, Mingyu Zong, Katrin Fischer, Abhyuday Singh, Anna-Maria Ve- lentza, Pau Sang, Shriya Upadhyay, Anika Gupta, Misha A Faruki, Wallace Browning, et al. 2024. Can an llm-powered socially assistive robot effectively and safely deliver cognitive behavioral therapy? a st...

    2024 arXiv

  50. [58]

    Taewook Kim, Hyeok Kim, Angela C Roberts, Maia Jacobs, and Matthew Kay

  51. [59]

    Olivia Knapton. 2016. Experiences of obsessive-compulsive disorder: Activity, state, and object episodes. Qualitative Health Research 26, 14 (2016), 2009–2023

    2016

  52. [60]

    Sina Kohl, Deva M Schönherr, Judy Luigjes, Damiaan Denys, Ulf J Mueller, Doris Lenartz, Veerle Visser-Vandewalle, and Jens Kuhn. 2014. Deep brain stimulation for treatment-refractory obsessive compulsive disorder: a systematic review. BMC psychiatry 14 (2014), 1–10

    2014

  53. [61]

    Lorrin M Koran. 2000. Quality of life in obsessive-compulsive disorder. Psychi- atric Clinics of North America 23, 3 (2000), 509–517

    2000

  54. [62]

    Kaylee Payne Kruzan, Ada Ng, Colleen Stiles-Shields, Emily G Lattie, David C Mohr, and Madhu Reddy. 2023. The perceived utility of smartphone and wearable sensor data in digital self-tracking technologies for mental health. InProceedings of the 2023 CHI Conference on Human Fac...

    2023

  55. [63]

    Juhyun Lee, Nikolay Chirkov, Ekaterina Ignasheva, Yury Pisarchyk, Mogan Shieh, Fabio Riccardi, Raman Sarokin, Andrei Kulik, and Matthias Grund- mann. 2019. On-device neural net inference with mobile gpus. arXiv preprint arXiv:1907.01989 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  56. [64]

    Patrick Lewis, Ethan Perez, Aleksandra Piktus, Fabio Petroni, Vladimir Karpukhin, Naman Goyal, Heinrich Küttler, Mike Lewis, Wen-tau Yih, Tim Rock- täschel, et al. 2020. Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive nlp tasks. Advances in neural information processing...

    2020

  57. [65]

    Christian Lind, Mark J Boschen, and Shirley Morrissey. 2013. Technological advances in psychotherapy: implications for the assessment and treatment of obsessive compulsive disorder. Journal of Anxiety Disorders 27, 1 (2013), 47–55

    2013

  58. [66]

    Xingyu Bruce Liu, Jiahao Nick Li, David Kim, Xiang’Anthony’ Chen, and Ruofei Du. 2024. Human I/O: Towards a Unified Approach to Detecting Situational Im- pairments. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. 1–18

    2024

  59. [67]

    Sara Llorens-Aguilar, Gemma García-Soriano, Sandra Arnaez, Frederick Aardema, and Kieron O’Connor. 2021. Is context a crucial factor in distinguish- ing between intrusions and obsessions in patients with obsessive-compulsive disorder? Journal of Clinical Psychology 77, 3 (2021...

    2021

  60. [68]

    Nicole Nadine Lønfeldt, Kristoffer Vinther Olesen, Sneha Das, Anna-Rosa Cecilie Mora-Jensen, Anne Katrine Pagsberg, and Line Katrine Harder Clemmensen

  61. [69]

    Tao Lu, Hongxiao Zheng, Tianying Zhang, Xuhai “Orson” Xu, and Anhong Guo

  62. [70]

    Alexandra S Macy, Jonathan N Theo, Sonia CV Kaufmann, Rassil B Ghazzaoui, Paul A Pawlowski, Hala I Fakhry, Brian J Cassmassi, and Waguih William IsHak

  63. [71]

    Avi Marciano. 2019. Reframing biometric surveillance: from a means of in- spection to a form of control. Ethics and Information Technology 21, 2 (2019), 127–136

    2019

  64. [72]

    David Mataix-Cols, Natalia S Lawrence, Sarah Wooderson, Anne Speckens, and Mary L Phillips. 2009. The Maudsley Obsessive–Compulsive Stimuli Set: Validation of a standardized paradigm for symptom-specific provocation in obsessive–compulsive disorder. Psychiatry Research 168, 3 ...

    2009

  65. [73]

    Brittany M Mathes, Danielle M Morabito, and Norman B Schmidt. 2019. Epi- demiological and clinical gender differences in OCD. Current psychiatry reports 21 (2019), 1–7

    2019

  66. [74]

    Frontiers in Psychiatry 14 (2023), 1231024

    Predicting obsessive-compulsive disorder episodes in adolescents using a wearable biosensor—A wrist angel feasibility study. Frontiers in Psychiatry 14 (2023), 1231024

    2023

  67. [75]

    Dean McKay, Jonathan S Abramowitz, John E Calamari, Michael Kyrios, Adam Radomsky, Debbie Sookman, Steven Taylor, and Sabine Wilhelm. 2004. A critical evaluation of obsessive–compulsive disorder subtypes: Symptoms versus ASSETS ’25, October 26–29, 2025, Denver, CO, USA Wang et...

    2004

  68. [76]

    In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems

    InteractOut: Leveraging Interaction Proxies as Input Manipulation Strate- gies for Reducing Smartphone Overuse. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–19

  69. [77]

    William R Miller and Stephen Rollnick. 2012. Motivational interviewing: Helping people change. Guilford press

    2012

  70. [78]

    Inbal Nahum-Shani, Shawna N Smith, Bonnie J Spring, Linda M Collins, Katie Witkiewitz, Ambuj Tewari, and Susan A Murphy. 2018. Just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) in mobile health: key components and design principles for ongoing health behavior support. Annals of Beh...

    2018

  71. [79]

    Ladislas Nalborczyk, Marcela Perrone-Bertolotti, Céline Baeyens, Romain Grand- champ, Mircea Polosan, Elsa Spinelli, Ernst HW Koster, and Hélène Lœvenbruck

  72. [80]

    Karthik Nandakumar and Anil K Jain. 2015. Biometric template protection: Bridging the performance gap between theory and practice. IEEE Signal Pro- cessing Magazine 32, 5 (2015), 88–100

    2015

  73. [81]

    Jingping Nie, Hanya Shao, Yuang Fan, Qijia Shao, Haoxuan You, Matthias Preindl, and Xiaofan Jiang. 2024. LLM-based Conversational AI Therapist for Daily Functioning Screening and Psychotherapeutic Intervention via Everyday Smart Devices. arXiv preprint arXiv:2403.10779 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  74. [82]

    Jamie I Mayerovitch, Guillaume Galbaud du Fort, Ritsuko Kakuma, Roger C Bland, Stephen C Newman, and Gilbert Pinard. 2003. Treatment seeking for obsessive-compulsive disorder: role of obsessive-compulsive disorder symptoms and comorbid psychiatric diagnoses. Comprehensive psyc...

    2003

  75. [83]

    OCDfeat. 2024. OCDfeat Home - 2024 - OCDfeat. Available online at: https: //ocdfeat.com, last accessed on 8/24/2024

    2024

  76. [84]

    Pietro Melzi, Christian Rathgeb, Ruben Tolosana, Ruben Vera-Rodriguez, and Christoph Busch. 2024. An overview of privacy-enhancing technologies in biometric recognition. Comput. Surveys 56, 12 (2024), 1–28

    2024

  77. [85]

    National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). 2024. Obsessive-Compulsive Dis- order - National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH). Available online at: https: //www.nimh.nih.gov/health/topics/obsessive-compulsive-disorder-ocd, last ac- cessed on 4/16/2024

    2024

  78. [86]

    Heidi J Ojalehto, Jonathan S Abramowitz, Samantha N Hellberg, Jennifer L Buchholz, and Michael P Twohig. 2020. Adherence to exposure and response prevention as a predictor of improvement in obsessive-compulsive symptom dimensions. Journal of anxiety disorders 72 (2020), 102210

    2020

  79. [87]

    Bunmi O Olatunji, Michelle L Davis, Mark B Powers, and Jasper AJ Smits

  80. [88]

    Bi- ological Psychology 127 (2017), 53–63

    Orofacial electromyographic correlates of induced verbal rumination. Bi- ological Psychology 127 (2017), 53–63

    2017

  81. [89]

    Kristoffer Vinther Olesen, Nicole Nadine Lønfeldt, Sneha Das, Anne Katrine Pagsberg, and Line Katrine Harder Clemmensen. 2023. Predicting obsessive- compulsive disorder events in children and adolescents in the wild using a wearable biosensor (wrist angel): Protocol for the an...

    2023

  82. [90]

    OpenAI. 2024. ChatGPT. Available online at: https://chat.openai.com, last accessed on 4/16/2024

    2024

  83. [91]

    NOCD. 2024. OCD Treatment and Therapy | NOCD. Available online at: https://www.treatmyocd.com, last accessed on 8/24/2024

    2024

  84. [92]

    Adiba Orzikulova, Han Xiao, Zhipeng Li, Yukang Yan, Yuntao Wang, Yuanchun Shi, Marzyeh Ghassemi, Sung-Ju Lee, Anind K Dey, and Xuhai Xu. 2024. Time2Stop: Adaptive and Explainable Human-AI Loop for Smartphone Overuse Intervention. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human F...

    2024

  85. [93]

    Bruna Oewel, Patricia Anne Arean, and Elena Agapie. 2024. Approaches for tailoring between-session mental health therapy activities. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems . 1–19

    2024

  86. [94]

    Phil Parette and Marcia Scherer. 2004. Assistive technology use and stigma. Education and training in developmental disabilities (2004), 217–226

    2004

  87. [95]

    Archit Parnami and Minwoo Lee. 2022. Learning from few examples: A summary of approaches to few-shot learning. arXiv preprint arXiv:2203.04291 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  88. [96]

    Dev Patnaik and Robert Becker. 1999. Needfinding: the why and how of uncov- ering people’s needs. Design Management Journal (Former Series) 10, 2 (1999), 37–43

    1999

  89. [97]

    Journal of psychiatric research 47, 1 (2013), 33–41

    Cognitive-behavioral therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: A meta- analysis of treatment outcome and moderators. Journal of psychiatric research 47, 1 (2013), 33–41

    2013

  90. [98]

    Hanife Olbrich, Katarina Stengler, and Sebastian Olbrich. 2016. Smartphone based Geo-Feedback in obsessive compulsive disorder as facilitatory interven- tion: a case report. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders 8 (2016), 75–78

    2016

  91. [99]

    YHPP Priyadarshana, Ashala Senanayake, Zilu Liang, and Ian Piumarta. 2024. Prompt engineering for digital mental health: a short review.Frontiers in Digital Health 6 (2024), 1410947

    2024

  92. [100]

    Adam S Radomsky, Michel J Dugas, Gillian M Alcolado, and Stefanie L Lavoie

  93. [101]

    Rita Orji and Karyn Moffatt. 2018. Persuasive technology for health and wellness: State-of-the-art and emerging trends. Health informatics journal 24, 1 (2018), 66–91

    2018

  94. [102]

    Ayelet M Ruscio, Dan J Stein, Wai Tat Chiu, and Ronald C Kessler. 2010. The epidemiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder in the National Comorbidity Survey Replication. Molecular psychiatry 15, 1 (2010), 53–63

    2010

  95. [103]

    Joseph O’Neill and Jamie D Feusner. 2015. Cognitive-behavioral therapy for obsessive–compulsive disorder: access to treatment, prediction of long-term outcome with neuroimaging. Psychology Research and Behavior Management (2015), 211–223

    2015

  96. [104]

    Marcia J Scherer. 2017. Technology adoption, acceptance, satisfaction and benefit: integrating various assistive technology outcomes. 2 pages

    2017

  97. [105]

    ScreenZen. 2024. Index | ScreenZen. Available online at: https://www.screenzen. co, last accessed on 8/24/2024

    2024

  98. [106]

    Phillip J Seibell and Eric Hollander. 2014. Management of obsessive-compulsive disorder. F1000prime reports 6 (2014)

    2014

  99. [107]

    Joel Philip and Vinu Cherian. 2021. Acceptance and commitment therapy in the treatment of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: A systematic review. Journal of Obsessive-Compulsive and Related Disorders 28 (2021), 100603

    2021

  100. [108]

    Betsy Phillips and Hongxin Zhao. 1993. Predictors of assistive technology abandonment. Assistive technology 5, 1 (1993), 36–45

    1993

  101. [109]

    Brooke M Smith, Ellen J Bluett, Eric B Lee, and Michael P Twohig. 2017. Ac- ceptance and commitment therapy for OCD. The Wiley handbook of obsessive compulsive disorders 1 (2017), 596–613

    2017

  102. [110]

    Stian Solem, Aashild T Haaland, Kristen Hagen, Gunvor Launes, Bjarne Hansen, Patrick A Vogel, and Joseph A Himle. 2015. Interpersonal style in obsessive compulsive disorder. The Cognitive Behaviour Therapist 8 (2015), e29

    2015

  103. [111]

    Maurício Sousa, Daniel Mendes, and Joaquim Jorge. 2019. Safe walking in vr using augmented virtuality. arXiv preprint arXiv:1911.13032 (2019)

    2019 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Christian Rupp, Daniela Gühne, Charlotte Falke, Philipp Doebler, Fabian An- dor, and Ulrike Buhlmann. 2020. Comparing effects of detached mindfulness and cognitive restructuring in obsessive-compulsive disorder using ecologi- cal momentary assessment. Clinical Psychology & Psy...

    2020

  105. [113]

    Vladan Starcevic, David Berle, Vlasios Brakoulias, Peter Sammut, Karen Moses, Denise Milicevic, and Anthony Hannan. 2011. Functions of compulsions in obsessive–compulsive disorder. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 45, 6 (2011), 449–457

    2011

  106. [114]

    Yehuda Sasson, Joseph Zohar, Miriam Chopra, Michal Lustig, Iulian Iancu, and Talma Hendler. 1997. Epidemiology of obsessive-compulsive disorder: a world view. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry 58, 12 (1997), 7–10

    1997

  107. [115]

    Jon Swain. 2018. A hybrid approach to thematic analysis in qualitative research: Using a practical example. Sage research methods (2018)

    2018

  108. [116]

    Annika Thierfelder, Jonas Primbs, Björn Severitt, Carolin S Hohnecker, Jan Kühnhausen, Annika K Alt, Anja Pascher, Ursula Wörz, Helene Passon, Jens Seemann, et al. 2022. Multimodal sensor-based identification of stress and com- pulsive actions in children with obsessive-compul...

    2022

  109. [117]

    PJ Matt Tilley and Clare S Rees. 2014. A clinical case study of the use of ecological momentary assessment in obsessive compulsive disorder.Frontiers in Psychology 5 (2014), 339

    2014

  110. [118]

    Ashish Sharma, Kevin Rushton, Inna Wanyin Lin, David Wadden, Khendra G Lucas, Adam S Miner, Theresa Nguyen, and Tim Althoff. 2023. Cognitive reframing of negative thoughts through human-language model interaction. arXiv preprint arXiv:2305.02466 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  111. [119]

    Kristen Shinohara and Jacob O Wobbrock. 2011. In the shadow of misperception: assistive technology use and social interactions. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems . 705–714

    2011

  112. [120]

    Karina Wahl, Philipp Marcel Scholl, Silvan Wirth, Marcel Miché, Jeannine Häni, Pia Schülin, and Roselind Lieb. 2022. On the automatic detection of enacted compulsive hand washing using commercially available wearable devices. Com- puters in Biology and Medicine 143 (2022), 105280

    2022

  113. [121]

    Huiyu Wang, Xin Zheng, Tengteng Hao, Yanwu Yu, Kaili Xu, and Yicheng Wang

  114. [122]

    Michael G Wheaton and Stephanie R Chen. 2021. Homework completion in treating obsessive–compulsive disorder with exposure and ritual prevention: a review of the empirical literature. Cognitive Therapy and Research 45 (2021), 236–249. Design Opportunities for Just-in-Time OCD I...

    2021

  115. [123]

    Lucienne Spencer and Havi Carel. 2021. ’Isn’t Everyone a Little OCD?’The Epistemic Harms of Wrongful Depathologization. Philosophy of Medicine 2, 1 (2021), 1–18

    2021

  116. [124]

    Junlin Xie, Zhihong Chen, Ruifei Zhang, Xiang Wan, and Guanbin Li. 2024. Large multimodal agents: A survey. arXiv preprint arXiv:2402.15116 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  117. [125]

    Mythily Subramaniam, Pauline Soh, Janhavi Ajit Vaingankar, Louisa Picco, and Siow Ann Chong. 2013. Quality of life in obsessive-compulsive disorder: impact of the disorder and of treatment. CNS drugs 27 (2013), 367–383

    2013

  118. [126]

    Xuhai Xu, Tianyuan Zou, Han Xiao, Yanzhang Li, Ruolin Wang, Tianyi Yuan, Yuntao Wang, Yuanchun Shi, Jennifer Mankoff, and Anind K Dey. 2022. TypeOut: leveraging just-in-time self-affirmation for smartphone overuse reduction. In Proceedings of the 2022 CHI Conference on Human F...

    2022

  119. [127]

    Morag Yule and Maureen L Whittal. 2017. Cognitive Therapy for Obsessive- Compulsive Disorder. The Wiley Handbook of Obsessive Compulsive Disorders 1 (2017), 581–595

    2017

  120. [128]

    Lotus Zhang, Abigale Stangl, Tanusree Sharma, Yu-Yun Tseng, Inan Xu, Danna Gurari, Yang Wang, and Leah Findlater. 2024. Designing Accessible Obfuscation Support for Blind Individuals’ Visual Privacy Management. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing...

    2024

  121. [129]

    John Torous, Jennifer Nicholas, Mark E Larsen, Joseph Firth, and Helen Chris- tensen. 2018. Clinical review of user engagement with mental health smart- phone apps: evidence, theory and improvements. BMJ Ment Health 21, 3 (2018), 116–119

    2018

  122. [130]

    Yu-Yun Tseng, Tanusree Sharma, Lotus Zhang, Abigale Stangl, Leah Findlater, Yang Wang, Danna Gurari Yu-Yun Tseng, and Danna Gurari. 2024. BIV-Priv-Seg: Locating Private Content in Images Taken by People With Visual Impairments. arXiv preprint arXiv:2407.18243 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  123. [133]

    Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 80 (2023), 104341

    Research on mental load state recognition based on combined information sources. Biomedical Signal Processing and Control 80 (2023), 104341

    2023

  124. [135]

    Monica S Wu and Adam B Lewin. 2017. Insight in Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder. The Wiley Handbook of Obsessive Compulsive Disorders 1 (2017), 492– 510

    2017

  125. [137]

    Mengwei Xu, Wangsong Yin, Dongqi Cai, Rongjie Yi, Daliang Xu, Qipeng Wang, Bingyang Wu, Yihao Zhao, Chen Yang, Shihe Wang, et al . 2024. A survey of resource-efficient llm and multimodal foundation models. arXiv preprint arXiv:2401.08092 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  126. [141]

    Renrui Zhang, Xiangfei Hu, Bohao Li, Siyuan Huang, Hanqiu Deng, Yu Qiao, Peng Gao, and Hongsheng Li. 2023. Prompt, generate, then cache: Cascade of foundation models makes strong few-shot learners. In Proceedings of the IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recogn...

    2023

  127. [142]

    Yiran Zhao, Yujie Tao, Grace Le, Rui Maki, Alexander Adams, Pedro Lopes, and Tanzeem Choudhury. 2023. Affective touch as immediate and passive wearable intervention. Proceedings of the ACM on Interactive, Mobile, Wearable and Ubiquitous Technologies 6, 4 (2023), 1–23. A Append...

    2023

  128. [1989]

    Development, use, and reliability

    The Yale-Brown obsessive compulsive scale: I. Development, use, and reliability. Archives of general psychiatry 46, 11 (1989), 1006–1011

    1989

  129. [2013]

    CNS spectrums 18, 1 (2013), 21–33

    Quality of life in obsessive compulsive disorder. CNS spectrums 18, 1 (2013), 21–33

    2013

  130. [2014]

    Behaviour research and therapy 59 (2014), 30–39

    When more is less: Doubt, repetition, memory, metamemory, and com- pulsive checking in OCD. Behaviour research and therapy 59 (2014), 30–39

    2014

  131. [2017]

    The Wiley handbook of obsessive compulsive disorders 1 (2017), 565–580

    Exposure therapy. The Wiley handbook of obsessive compulsive disorders 1 (2017), 565–580

    2017

  132. [2022]

    In 2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN)

    Virtual barriers in augmented reality for safe and effective human-robot cooperation in manufacturing. In 2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN) . IEEE, 1174–1180

    2022

  133. [2023]

    JMIR Mental Health 10 (2023), e45572

    Wearable and Mobile Technologies for the Evaluation and Treatment of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: Scoping Review. JMIR Mental Health 10 (2023), e45572

    2023

  134. [2024]

    Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 8, CSCW1 (2024), 1–26

    Opportunities in Mental Health Support for Informal Dementia Caregivers Suffering from Verbal Agitation. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction 8, CSCW1 (2024), 1–26

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.