Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 40 references

Probing scattering of Raman phonons on magnetic and electronic excitations in pyrochlores Nd$_2$Zr$_2$O$_7$ and Nd$_2$Ir$_2$O$_7$

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Raman phonon widths in Nd2Zr2O7 and Nd2Ir2O7 reveal scattering channels beyond phonon-phonon: crystal fields in the zirconate, electrons in the iridate.

desk verdict Careful Raman study with a solid CEF doublet result, but the headline phonon–CEF scattering claim is under-supported by the data and the electron-phonon analysis has a fitting-consistency problem. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.13326 v2 pith:PSIFOAIH submitted 2025-01-23 cond-mat.str-el

Sami Muhammad , Yuanyuan Xu , Christos Kakogiannis , Takumi Ohtsuki , Yang Qiu , Satoru Nakatsuji , Eli Zoghlin , Stephen D. Wilson
show 1 more author
Natalia Drichko
This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el PACS 78.30.-j63.20.-e71.38.-k
keywords pyrochloreRamanscatteringphononlinewidthcrystal-fieldexcitationselectron-phononKlemensmodelNd2Zr2O7Nd2Ir2O7
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses temperature-dependent Raman scattering to track zone-center phonons and Nd3+ crystal-field excitations in two pyrochlores, insulating Nd2Zr2O7 and semimetallic Nd2Ir2O7, in their paramagnetic temperature ranges. The authors argue that phonon linewidths and frequencies carry signatures of interactions beyond ordinary phonon-phonon scattering. In Nd2Zr2O7, a deviation near 100 K coincides with the depopulation of the first excited crystal-field level and a Schottky anomaly in heat capacity, so the lattice appears to scatter off crystal-field excitations. In Nd2Ir2O7, the two lowest phonons narrow far faster than the Klemens model predicts, and this is attributed to electron-phonon scattering as the thermal population of electronic levels decreases. If correct, Raman phonon measurements become a way to see how the lattice couples to magnetic and electronic degrees of freedom in frustrated magnets.

What carries the argument

The quantitative backbone is the comparison of measured phonon linewidths with the Klemens model, gamma(T) = gamma0 + A(2 n_B(omega/2) + 1), which encodes phonon-phonon scattering through a Bose factor; deviations from it signal other scattering channels. For the iridate, the alternative model gamma(T) = gamma0 + F(n_F(omega_a) - n_F(omega_a + omega_ph)) describes phonon scattering on interband electronic excitations via Fermi occupation factors. The discrimination between the two materials rests on the insulator/semimetal contrast between Nd2Zr2O7 and Nd2Ir2O7, on Raman polarization selection rules that assign phonon symmetries, and on the D3d crystal-field level scheme of Nd3+ that locates the CEF excitations.

What would settle it

Measure the temperature-dependent Raman phonon linewidths of a nonmagnetic structural analog such as Y2Zr2O7 or Lu2Zr2O7 under identical conditions; if the same 100 K deviation appears, the anomaly is not caused by Nd3+ crystal-field depopulation. Alternatively, apply a magnetic field strong enough to shift or split the Nd3+ crystal-field levels and check whether the phonon anomaly follows the shift.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that in both compounds the temperature dependence of Raman-active phonons cannot be explained by phonon-phonon scattering alone. For Nd2Zr2O7, the phonon width follows the Klemens model overall but deviates upward around 100 K, and phonon frequencies stop hardening or soften below that temperature; the same temperature marks a Schottky-like feature in heat capacity assigned to depopulation of the first excited crystal-field level at 23.5 meV. The paper concludes that the lattice responds to that depopulation, providing an additional scattering channel for phonons. For Nd2Ir2O7, the T2g(1) and Eg phonons lose width much more rapidly on cooling than Klemens behavior allows, and the data are described by scattering on interband electronic transitions with Fermi factors; this is interpreted as electron-phonon scattering controlled by depopulation of electronic levels. The measurements also resolve in Nd2Zr2O7 a crystal-field doublet at 34.4 and 35.2 meV that neutron scattering saw as one broad band.

Load-bearing premise

The Nd2Zr2O7 conclusion assumes that the Klemens model, fitted to the same data, is the correct baseline for ordinary phonon-phonon scattering; the reported deviation near 100 K is small and no error bars are given, so anharmonicity, thermal expansion, or background artifacts could in principle absorb it.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Phonon linewidth measurements in rare-earth pyrochlores can serve as a local probe of crystal-field level depopulation, complementing heat capacity and neutron scattering.
  • In pyrochlore iridates, the broadening of low-energy phonons at high temperature carries information about the population of electronic bands, not just anharmonicity.
  • The absence in Nd-based pyrochlores of the Eg phonon splitting seen in Pr-based ones suggests that the lattice-magnetic coupling mechanism depends on the rare-earth ground-state symmetry, consistent with theory for non-Kramers systems.
  • Resolving the Nd2Zr2O7 crystal-field doublet by Raman shows that optical spectroscopy can sharpen the CEF level scheme in these quantum spin-ice candidate materials.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If phonon-CEF scattering is the cause, the anomaly temperature should track the CEF gap: replacing Nd with a rare earth of different first-excited-level energy would shift the deviation accordingly.
  • A direct control experiment on a nonmagnetic structural analog, such as Y2Zr2O7 or Lu2Zr2O7, should show no 100 K phonon anomaly; its presence would refute the CEF-scattering assignment.
  • The electron-phonon interpretation implies that the anomalous phonon widths in Nd2Ir2O7 should respond to doping or pressure that moves the Fermi level relative to the interband threshold.
  • Extending the same analysis below the magnetic ordering temperature could connect the paramagnetic scattering channels identified here to the phonon anomalies already reported in the ordered state.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports temperature-dependent Raman scattering of zone-center phonons and crystal-field (CEF) excitations in the pyrochlores Nd2Zr2O7 and Nd2Ir2O7, measured between ~10–290 K for the zirconate and ~50–270 K for the iridate. For Nd2Zr2O7, the authors observe phonon frequencies that harden on cooling but flatten or soften below about 100 K, and phonon linewidths that deviate slightly from a Klemens anharmonic baseline around 100 K. They interpret this as an additional phonon scattering channel caused by depopulation of the first excited CEF level, supported by a correlation with a Schottky-like anomaly in heat capacity. For Nd2Ir2O7, two low-frequency phonons show linewidths that decrease faster than the Klemens prediction on cooling; the authors model this with an electron-phonon interband scattering term and conclude that these phonons are broadened by scattering from electronic interband transitions. The paper also resolves a CEF doublet near 34–35 meV in Nd2Zr2O7, which was previously unresolved in neutron scattering.

Significance. If the central claims hold, Raman phonon linewidths and frequencies in rare-earth pyrochlores become a direct probe of crystal-field depopulation and electronic interband excitations, which would be a useful addition to the spectroscopy of frustrated magnets and semimetals. The paper has clear strengths: it presents high-quality temperature-dependent Raman data over a wide range, explicitly compares an insulator and a semimetal with ostensibly identical phonon symmetries, resolves a predicted CEF doublet, and uses standard fitting procedures for phonon parameters. The comparison between the two compounds is informative, and the data on Nd2Ir2O7 in the paramagnetic state complement existing studies of the ordered state. However, the zirconate claim rests on a small deviation from a Klemens baseline fitted to the same data, with no reported uncertainties and no quantitative model for the proposed CEF-phonon scattering contribution; the iridate claim uses a per-phonon fitted interband energy and contains an internal sign inconsistency between the text and Table V. These issues currently limit the strength of the conclusions.

major comments (4)
  1. [III.A.1, Fig. 2 (right panel), Table IV] The central evidence for the Nd2Zr2O7 claim is a deviation of the phonon linewidth from a Klemens baseline around 100 K, yet no uncertainties are reported for the fitted linewidths or for the Klemens parameters A and gamma0 in Table IV. Because the baseline is fitted to the same data, the excess could be within scatter. Please provide error bars or confidence intervals for the fitted widths, show fit residuals, and test whether the deviation is statistically significant relative to alternative baselines such as higher-order anharmonicity or thermal-expansion corrections.
  2. [III.A.1, Figs. 1 and 2, and III.B] The CEF doublet at 34.4 and 35.2 meV sits immediately below the T2g(1) phonon at 37.9 meV and appears as a growing "wing" on cooling in the (x,y) channel. If these CEF peaks are not explicitly included in the Voigt fits used to extract phonon parameters, the fitted T2g(1) width can change as the CEF peaks sharpen, producing a spurious bump near 100 K. The manuscript does not state whether the CEF peaks were part of the fit model. Please report the full fitting model for each phonon and demonstrate that the 100-K anomaly in the linewidth is stable with respect to inclusion or exclusion of the CEF lines.
  3. [III.A.2, text before Table V, and Table V] The text defines the electron-phonon linewidth as Gamma_ph-el(T) = Gamma0 + F (n_F(hbar omega_a, T) - n_F(hbar omega_a + hbar omega_ph, T)), but Table V and the surrounding discussion use n_F(omega_a) + n_F(omega_a + omega). This is an internal inconsistency: the relative sign determines whether the scattering decreases or increases on cooling. Please correct this and clarify which form was actually fitted. In addition, omega_a is fitted independently for each phonon and is not compared with band-structure calculations or other measurements, so the agreement in Fig. 2 is partly a fit rather than a parameter-free prediction. Please provide uncertainties for omega_a and discuss how many free parameters are used for each temperature curve.
  4. [IV, Discussion of Nd2Zr2O7] The interpretation that the lattice reacts to CEF depopulation is based on a correlation with a broad Schottky-like heat capacity feature, but the paper never computes the expected temperature dependence of the phonon linewidth from a CEF-phonon coupling term. Without such a model, the mechanism is not demonstrated: the deviation from Klemens behavior could equally arise from thermal expansion, higher-order anharmonicity, or spectral contamination. Please add a quantitative estimate of the expected linewidth anomaly, or at least a falsifiable prediction of its size and temperature dependence, so that the proposed scattering channel can be distinguished from these alternatives.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Introduction] There are several typos and grammatical issues: "possess" should be "possesses", "optimum" and "optimal" are used inconsistently, "parmagnetic" should be "paramagnetic", and "two orderes of magnitude" should be "two orders of magnitude".
  2. [Fig. 4 caption] The caption states the subtraction is chi''(T=14 K) - chi''(300 K) for Nd2Zr2O7, but Fig. 1 shows spectra down to 4 K; please clarify the exact temperatures used for the subtraction and whether the 14-K value is a typo.
  3. [II. Experimental, background subtraction] The background subtraction procedure for Nd2Ir2O7 is described in words but no example of the raw spectrum, the modelled background, or the subtracted spectrum is shown; a figure or supplementary material would help the reader judge the reliability of the weak phonon features.
  4. [III.A.1, P1 feature] The unidentified feature P1 at 472 cm^-1 appears in both scattering channels and is described as not assignable to phonons or CEF excitations, but its temperature dependence and possible influence on the phonon fits are not discussed; please address this explicitly.
  5. [III.A.1 and Discussion] The statement that phonon hardening on cooling follows from lattice contraction is cited to Refs. [31,32], but Ref. [32] is an Applied Physics Letters paper and does not appear to report thermal expansion for Nd2Zr2O7; please verify the citation for the thermal-contraction data.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper's claims rest on fits used as descriptions and on external heat-capacity, neutron, and prior Raman correlations, not on equations that reduce to their own inputs.

full rationale

The central Nd2Zr2O7 phonon-CEF claim is not circular: the Klemens model parameters in Table IV are fitted to the same linewidth data and used as a baseline, so the reported deviation near 100 K is a residual of that fit rather than an independently predicted excess. That is a model-comparison/statistical limitation, not a derivation in which the conclusion is an input. The attribution to CEF depopulation is anchored externally by the heat-capacity Schottky anomaly in Refs. [31,34] and by neutron-scattering CEF levels, so the claim does not reduce by construction to the phonon fit. For Nd2Ir2O7, the electron-phonon model in Table V fits F, gamma0, and omega_a to the same width data, and omega_a is not independently verified against band structure; this makes the interpretation underdetermined, but it is a fitting/identification issue rather than a circular step, since the paper does not present the fitted curve as an independent prediction of a separately measured quantity. The self-citations [20,29] are used for phonon assignment and for prior observation of electron-phonon broadening in Pr2Ir2O7, with independent support also cited [33]; no uniqueness theorem or ansatz is imported solely through self-citation. No equation in the paper defines a target quantity in terms of itself, and no fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction of the same datum. The manuscript is therefore self-contained with respect to circularity, though several interpretation and uncertainty concerns would belong in a correctness or statistics review rather than a circularity analysis.

Assumptions & free parameters 9 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The central claims rest on modeled baselines (Klemens and electron-phonon), transferred phonon assignments, and a fitted CEF scheme; the only directly measured quantities are Raman spectra, while the deviations that drive the claims are small or fit-dependent.

free parameters (9)
  • Klemens A and gamma0 for T2g(1) phonon, Nd2Zr2O7 = A=0.6 meV, gamma0=1.7 meV
    Defines the phonon-phonon baseline in the Klemens model; the 100 K deviation is measured against this fitted curve.
  • Klemens A and gamma0 for Eg phonon, Nd2Zr2O7 = A=0.8 meV, gamma0=1.3 meV
    Fitted baseline parameters for the Eg phonon used to judge deviations from Klemens behavior.
  • Klemens A and gamma0 for T2g(2) phonon, Nd2Zr2O7 = A=0.6 meV, gamma0=1.0 meV
    Fitted baseline parameters for the T2g(2) phonon used in the deviation analysis.
  • Klemens A and gamma0 for A1g phonon, Nd2Zr2O7 = A=1.1 meV, gamma0=0.4 meV
    Fitted baseline parameters for the A1g phonon used in the deviation analysis.
  • Klemens A and gamma0 for T2g(3) phonon, Nd2Zr2O7 = A=0.8 meV, gamma0=1.0 meV
    Fitted baseline parameters for the T2g(3) phonon used in the deviation analysis.
  • Electron-phonon F, gamma0, omega_a for T2g(1) phonon, Nd2Ir2O7 = F=4.7 meV, gamma0=0.3 meV, omega_a=18.8 meV
    The interband energy omega_a is fitted per phonon, so the agreement with the electron-phonon model is partly a fit rather than an independent prediction.
  • Electron-phonon F, gamma0, omega_a for Eg phonon, Nd2Ir2O7 = F=9.2 meV, gamma0=1.5 meV, omega_a=27.8 meV
    The fitted interband energy for the Eg phonon is not independently checked against band structure or optical measurements.
  • Electron-phonon F, gamma0, omega_a for T2g(2) phonon, Nd2Ir2O7 = F=4.2 meV, gamma0=1.6 meV, omega_a=39.2 meV
    The fitted interband energy for the T2g(2) phonon is not independently checked against band structure or optical measurements.
  • Electron-phonon F, gamma0, omega_a for A1g phonon, Nd2Ir2O7 = F=4.3 meV, gamma0=0.8 meV, omega_a=30.6 meV
    The fitted interband energy for the A1g phonon is not independently checked against band structure or optical measurements.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Phonon mode assignments for Nd2Zr2O7 and Nd2Ir2O7 are transferred from DFT calculations for Pr2Zr2O7 and Pr2Ir2O7 (Refs. 20, 29).
    The isostructural pyrochlores are assumed to have the same phonon symmetries and similar frequencies; no DFT for the Nd compounds is presented.
  • domain assumption The Klemens model gamma(T)=gamma0+A(2n_B(omega/2)+1) is the correct baseline for phonon-phonon scattering in these materials.
    Deviations from this model are attributed to additional scattering channels; if anharmonicity or thermal expansion produce the same shape, the phonon-CEF claim weakens.
  • domain assumption The electron-phonon scattering model uses a single interband energy omega_a per phonon with Fermi functions, and omega_a is fitted.
    The model assumes one dominant electronic transition; the fitted omega_a values are not checked against independent band-structure or optical data.
  • domain assumption The crystal-field level scheme of Nd3+ in D3d symmetry from point-charge calculations and neutron scattering (Refs. 30, 31) is correct.
    Used to assign CEF transitions and to connect the 23.5 meV level depopulation to the 100 K phonon anomaly.
  • domain assumption The artifact background in Nd2Ir2O7 spectra is temperature-independent Gaussians plus a temperature-dependent linear term, separable from Voigt phonon lineshapes.
    The multi-step subtraction in Section II assumes this decomposition; incorrect background treatment would change the phonon widths and their temperature dependence.
  • domain assumption Voigt profiles with the Gaussian width fixed at 1.5 cm^-1 correctly represent the spectrometer resolution and phonon lineshapes.
    All phonon parameters are extracted from this assumed lineshape; the fixed Gaussian width is an instrumental resolution estimate.
invented entities (1)
  • None
    purpose: No new physical entities are introduced.
    The paper interprets measured phonon and CEF spectra without postulating new particles, fields, or conserved quantities.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Probing scattering of Raman phonons on magnetic and electronic excitations in pyrochlores Nd$_2$Zr$_2$O$_7$ and Nd$_2$Ir$_2$O$_7$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/PSIFOAIH

@misc{pith2026250113326,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Probing scattering of Raman phonons on magnetic and electronic excitations in pyrochlores Nd$_2$Zr$_2$O$_7$ and Nd$_2$Ir$_2$O$_7$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/PSIFOAIH}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.13326}
}
abstract

Magnetic rare earth atoms on pyrochlore lattice can produce such exotic magnetic states as spin ice and quantum spin ice. These states are a result of the frustration in the pyrochlore lattice, as well as crystal field degrees of freedom of rare earth atoms, and their interactions with the lattice. Raman scattering spectroscopy, which possess high spectral resolution and can easily access broad energy and temperature ranges, is an optimum tool to study these excitations and their interactions. In this work we follow Raman scattering of zone center phonons and crystal field excitations of Nd$^{3+}$ in Nd$_2$Zr$_2$O$_7$ and Nd$_2$Ir$_2$O$_7$ in the temperature range where these materials are paramagnetic. A comparison between an insulating Nd$_2$Zr$_2$O$_7$ and semimetallic Nd$_2$Ir$_2$O$_7$ materials allow us to distinguish between scattering of phonons on other phonons, crystal field excitations, and electrons, highlighting interactions between these degrees of freedom.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.13326 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Raman scattering spectra of Nd [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. shows temperature dependent Raman spectra of Nd2Ir2O7 in 35-70 meV spectral range in (x, x + y) scat￾tering channel in the paramagnetic state from room tem￾perature down to 50K. Since the structure of Nd2Ir2O7 is very close to that of Nd2Zr2O7 we expect phonons of the same symmetries and similar energies, despite the overall intensity of the spectra about two orderes of mag￾nitude lower due to the semimetallic natur… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. FIG. 4. (a) Raman spectra of Nd [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

40 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Phonons of Nd 2Zr2O7 Temperature dependent Raman phonon spectra of Nd2Zr2O7 in ( x, x) and ( x, y) scattering channels are TABLE III. Phonon frequencies of Nd 2Zr2O7 and Nd 2Ir2O7 with the assignment based on the polarization dependence and DFT calculations for Pr 2Zr2O7 and Pr 2Ir2O7 presented in [29] Nd2Zr2O7(meV) Nd2Ir2O7(meV) Symmetry 37.9 37.1 T(1) 2...

    work page

  2. [2]

    3 shows temperature dependent Raman spectra of Nd2Ir2O7 in 35-70 meV spectral range in ( x, x+ y) scat- tering channel in the paramagnetic state from room tem- perature down to 50K

    Phonons of Nd 2Ir2O7 Fig. 3 shows temperature dependent Raman spectra of Nd2Ir2O7 in 35-70 meV spectral range in ( x, x+ y) scat- tering channel in the paramagnetic state from room tem- perature down to 50K. Since the structure of Nd 2Ir2O7 is very close to that of Nd 2Zr2O7 we expect phonons of the same symmetries and similar energies, despite the overal...

    work page

  3. [3]

    J. S. Gardner, M. J. P. Gingras, and J. E. Greedan, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 53 (2010)

    2010

  4. [4]

    M. J. Gingras and P. A. McClarty, Reports on Progress in Physics 77, 056501 (2014)

    work page 2014

  5. [5]

    J. G. Rau and M. J. Gingras, Annual Review of Con- densed Matter Physics 10, 357 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Gaudet, E

    J. Gaudet, E. M. Smith, J. Dudemaine, J. Beare, C. R. C. Buhariwalla, N. P. Butch, M. B. Stone, A. I. Kolesnikov, G. Xu, D. R. Yahne, K. A. Ross, C. A. Marjerrison, J. D. Garrett, G. M. Luke, A. D. Bianchi, and B. D. Gaulin, Phys. Rev. Lett. 122, 187201 (2019)

    2019

  7. [7]

    B. Gao, T. Chen, D. W. Tam, C.-L. Huang, K. Sasmal, D. T. Adroja, F. Ye, H. Cao, G. Sala, M. B. Stone, et al., Nature Physics 15, 1052 (2019)

    2019

  8. [8]

    E. M. Smith, O. Benton, D. R. Yahne, B. Placke, R. Sch¨ afer, J. Gaudet, J. Dudemaine, A. Fitterman, J. Beare, A. R. Wildes, S. Bhattacharya, T. DeLazzer, C. R. C. Buhariwalla, N. P. Butch, R. Movshovich, J. D. Garrett, C. A. Marjerrison, J. P. Clancy, E. Kermarrec, G. M. Luke, A. D. Bianchi, K. A. Ross, and B. D. Gaulin, Phys. Rev. X 12, 021015 (2022)

    2022

Show all 40 references
  1. [9]

    Bhardwaj, S

    A. Bhardwaj, S. Zhang, H. Yan, R. Moessner, A. H. Nev- idomskyy, and H. J. Changlani, npj Quantum Materials 7, 51 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    L´ eger, E

    M. L´ eger, E. Lhotel, M. Ciomaga Hatnean, J. Ollivier, A. R. Wildes, S. Raymond, E. Ressouche, G. Balakrish- nan, and S. Petit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 247201 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    J. Xu, O. Benton, A. Islam, T. Guidi, G. Ehlers, and B. Lake, Physical Review Letters 124, 097203 (2020)

    2020

  4. [12]

    Witczak-Krempa and Y

    W. Witczak-Krempa and Y. B. Kim, Phys. Rev. B 85, 045124 (2012)

    2012

  5. [13]

    Matsuhira, M

    K. Matsuhira, M. Wakeshima, Y. Hinatsu, and S. Tak- agi, Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 80, 094701 (2011)

    2011

  6. [14]

    K. Ueda, J. Fujioka, Y. Takahashi, T. Suzuki, S. Ishiwata, Y. Taguchi, and Y. Tokura, Phys. Rev. Lett.109, 136402 (2012)

    2012

  7. [15]

    X. Wan, A. M. Turner, A. Vishwanath, and S. Y. Savrasov, Physical Review B 83, 205101 (2011)

    2011

  8. [16]

    Witczak-Krempa, G

    W. Witczak-Krempa, G. Chen, Y. B. Kim, and L. Ba- lents, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 5, 57 (2014)

    2014

  9. [17]

    Savary and L

    L. Savary and L. Balents, Reports on Progress in Physics 80, 016502 (2016)

    2016

  10. [18]

    Nikoli´ c, Y

    P. Nikoli´ c, Y. Xu, T. Ohtsuki, D. C. Elbert, S. Nakatsuji, and N. Drichko, Phys. Rev. B 110, 035148 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    M. J. Pearce, K. G¨ otze, A. Szab´ o, T. Sikkenk, M. R. Lees, A. Boothroyd, D. Prabhakaran, C. Castelnovo, and P. Goddard, Nature Communications 13, 444 (2022)

    2022

  12. [20]

    Y. Xu, Y. Yang, J. Teyssier, T. Ohtsuki, Y. Qiu, S. Nakatsuji, D. van der Marel, N. B. Perkins, and N. Drichko, arXiv preprint arXiv:2302.00579 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  13. [21]

    N. Tang, Y. Gritsenko, K. Kimura, S. Bhattacharjee, A. Sakai, M. Fu, H. Takeda, H. Man, K. Sugawara, Y. Matsumoto, et al., Nature Physics 19, 92 (2023)

    2023

  14. [22]

    Y. Xu, H. Man, N. Tang, S. Baidya, H. Zhang, S. Nakat- suji, D. Vanderbilt, and N. Drichko, Phys. Rev. B 104, 075125 (2021)

    2021

  15. [23]

    Gaudet, A

    J. Gaudet, A. M. Hallas, C. R. C. Buhariwalla, G. Sala, M. B. Stone, M. Tachibana, K. Baroudi, R. J. Cava, and B. D. Gaulin, Phys. Rev. B 98, 014419 (2018)

    2018

  16. [24]

    Thalmeier and P

    P. Thalmeier and P. Fulde, Physical Review Letters 49, 1588 (1982)

    1982

  17. [25]

    C. H. Sohn, C. H. Kim, L. J. Sandilands, N. T. M. Hien, S. Y. Kim, H. J. Park, K. W. Kim, S. Moon, J. Ya- maura, Z. Hiroi, et al., Physical Review Letters 118, 117201 (2017)

    2017

  18. [26]

    J. Son, B. C. Park, C. H. Kim, H. Cho, S. Y. Kim, L. J. Sandilands, C. Sohn, J.-G. Park, S. J. Moon, and T. W. Noh, npj Quantum materials 4, 17 (2019)

    2019

  19. [27]

    A. Seth, S. Bhattacharjee, and R. Moessner, Phys. Rev. B 106, 054507 (2022)

    2022

  20. [28]

    J. N. Millican, R. T. Macaluso, S. Nakatsuji, Y. Machida, Y. Maeno, and J. Y. Chan, Materials research bulletin 42, 928 (2007)

    2007

  21. [29]

    Zoghlin, J

    E. Zoghlin, J. Schmehr, C. Holgate, R. Dally, Y. Liu, G. Laurita, and S. D. Wilson, Phys. Rev. Mater. 5, 084403 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    Cardona and G

    M. Cardona and G. G¨ untherodt, Light Scattering in Solids VII: Crystal-Field and Magnetic Excitations , Vol. 75 (Springer, 2000)

    2000

  23. [31]

    Y. Xu, H. Man, N. Tang, T. Ohtsuki, S. Baidya, S. Nakat- suji, D. Vanderbilt, and N. Drichko, Phys. Rev. B 105, 075137 (2022)

    2022

  24. [32]

    Watahiki, K

    M. Watahiki, K. Tomiyasu, K. Matsuhira, K. Iwasa, M. Yokoyama, S. Takagi, M. Wakeshima, and Y. Hinatsu, in Journal of Physics: Conference Series, Vol. 320 (IOP Publishing, 2011) p. 012080

    2011

  25. [33]

    J. Xu, V. K. Anand, A. K. Bera, M. Frontzek, D. L. Abernathy, N. Casati, K. Siemensmeyer, and B. Lake, Phys. Rev. B 92, 224430 (2015)

    2015

  26. [34]

    Y. Kim, X. Chen, Z. Wang, J. Shi, I. Miotkowski, Y. Chen, P. Sharma, A. Lima Sharma, M. Hekmaty, Z. Jiang, et al., Applied Physics Letters 100, 071907 (2012)

    2012

  27. [35]

    G. B. Osterhoudt, Y. Wang, C. A. Garcia, V. M. Plisson, J. Gooth, C. Felser, P. Narang, and K. S. Burch, Physical Review X 11, 011017 (2021)

    2021

  28. [36]

    Hatnean Ciomaga, M

    M. Hatnean Ciomaga, M. R. Lees, O. A. Petrenko, D. S. Keeble, G. Balakrishnan, M. J. Gutmann, V. V. Klekovk- ina, and B. Z. Malkin, Phys. Rev. B 91, 174416 (2015)

    2015

  29. [37]

    K. Ueda, R. Kaneko, A. Subedi, M. Minola, B. J. Kim, J. Fujioka, Y. Tokura, and B. Keimer, Phys. Rev. B100, 115157 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    Rosalin, P

    M. Rosalin, P. Telang, S. Singh, D. V. S. Muthu, and A. K. Sood, Phys. Rev. B 108, 195144 (2023)

    2023

  31. [39]

    Rosalin, P

    M. Rosalin, P. Telang, S. Singh, D. Muthu, and A. Sood, Physical Review B 109, 184434 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    J.-J. Wen, S. M. Koohpayeh, K. A. Ross, B. A. Trump, T. M. McQueen, K. Kimura, S. Nakatsuji, Y. Qiu, D. M. Pajerowski, J. R. D. Copley, and C. L. Broholm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 107206 (2017)

    2017

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.