Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 47 references

High-intensity wave vortices around subwavelength holes: from ocean tides to nanooptics

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Wave vortices of a second kind form around excluded holes in a 2D plane, with intensity and orbital angular momentum pinned to the hole edge rather than to a phase singularity.

desk verdict A real and well-illustrated effect, but the abstract's subwavelength-localization claim is not supported for ℓ=±1 and needs to be walked back. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.13860 v1 pith:BEVSGD5K submitted 2025-01-23 physics.optics physics.ao-ph

Kateryna Domina , Pablo Alonso-González , Andrei Bylinkin , María Barra-Burillo , Ana I. F. Tresguerres-Mata , Francisco Javier Alfaro-Mozaz , Saül Vélez , Fèlix Casanova
show 4 more authors
Luis E. Hueso Rainer Hillenbrand Konstantin Y. Bliokh Alexey Y. Nikitin
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.ao-ph
keywords wavevorticesorbitalangularmomentumphasesingularitysubwavelengthconfinementphononpolaritonsoceantidesnear-fieldopticsscalarequation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper argues that wave vortices come in two kinds: the familiar dark-core vortices that wind around a point of zero intensity, and a second kind that winds around an excluded region ('hole') in a 2D plane and has its peak intensity at the hole edge. The authors call the second kind type-II vortices and derive them from the second-kind Bessel solution of the Helmholtz equation, whose pole at the origin becomes a legitimate finite solution once the origin is cut out. If correct, bright phase-winding fields with a localization scale set by the hole radius, not the wavelength, can exist around any small scatterer, defect, or island in a homogeneous 2D wave system. They demonstrate the pattern in optical near fields around a gold disc, in phonon-polariton fields around nanoholes in a polaritonic crystal, and in lunar tidal maps around New Zealand and Madagascar, and they propose a dipole-plus-plane-wave interference model for its generation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the pole of the complex wavefunction, truncated by an exclusion: $Y_{|\ell|}(kr)e^{i\ell\varphi}$ diverges at the origin but solves the Helmholtz equation on $\mathbb{R}^2\setminus\{r\le a\}$, playing the role for type-II vortices that a zero plays for type-I. The machinery for generating such vortices in practice is interference between a dipolar source and a propagating wave: two orthogonal dipoles with a $\pm\pi/2$ phase difference produce $\psi\propto (x\pm iy)/r^2=e^{\pm i\varphi}/r$, and a single linear dipole superposed on a plane wave with relative amplitude $A$ and phase $\delta$ produces the coexisting dark and bright vortex pair, with the bright vortex's charge and position controlled by $\delta$.

What would settle it

Measure the radial energy or OAM density around a single isolated subwavelength hole in a low-loss 2D wave system and check whether the cumulative integral of $|\psi|^2$ out to radius $R$ saturates within a few hole radii; for the $\ell=\pm1$ type-II mode in an unbounded annulus it instead grows like $\ln(R/a)$, which would falsify the subwavelength-confinement claim in that setting.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On a plane with a circular hole of radius $a$, the Helmholtz equation $\nabla^2\psi+k^2\psi=0$ admits two circularly symmetric families: $\psi_{\rm I}\propto J_{|\ell|}(kr)e^{i\ell\varphi}$, the usual vortex around an intensity zero, and $\psi_{\rm II}\propto Y_{|\ell|}(kr)e^{i\ell\varphi}$, which diverges at $r=0$ but is finite on the punctured plane $\mathbb{R}^2\setminus\{r\le a\}$. The paper's central claim is that this second family, once recognized, describes high-intensity 'bright' vortices: the phase still winds $2\pi\ell$ around the excluded region, the amplitude has its maximum at the hole edge, and for $a\ll\lambda$ the entire vortex is subwavelength. The paper also gives a generation mechanism: a point-like dipole source at the hole, whose $1/r$ field is excluded by the finite hole, interfering with either a second orthogonal phase-shifted dipole (giving $\psi\propto e^{\pm i\varphi}/r$) or with a plane wave (giving a dark type-I vortex and a bright type-II vortex of opposite charge, with the bright one dominating the orbital angular momentum). Numerical and experimental near-field images around a gold nanodisc and around nanoholes in a phonon-polariton crystal, plus M2 tidal data around New Zealand and Madagascar, are presented as instances of the same object.

Load-bearing premise

The case rests on the assumption that the $1/r$ amplitude fall-off of the $\ell=\pm1$ vortex piles its energy up against the hole edge; in a strictly infinite, loss-free plane the energy in a ring between $r$ and $r+dr$ is the same for every decade of $r$, so the localization statement needs a finite outer boundary or absorption to be exactly true.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Type-II vortices should appear around any subwavelength exclusion in a homogeneous 2D wave system: a metal disc, a nanohole, a defect, or an island can all play the role of the 'hole'.
  • The field and its orbital angular momentum are localized on the scale of the hole radius $a$, which can be far below the wavelength, enabling subwavelength vortex-based devices.
  • A wave field can carry nonzero total orbital angular momentum while having zero total topological charge, because the bright type-II vortex outweighs the dark type-I partner.
  • Controlling the mutual phase $\delta$ between the dipole and the plane wave switches the vortex sign and can extinguish the vortices at $\delta=\pi/2$ and $3\pi/2$.
  • The same winding pattern in tidal data means the concept crosses scales from hundreds of nanometres to thousands of kilometres.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A testable extension is to search for the same high-intensity phase winding around seamounts or smaller islands in global tidal models; the dipole mechanism predicts that any subwavelength-scale topographic feature that oscillates with the tide should show a type-II vortex with a sign tied to the phase of its oscillation.
  • In acoustic or elastic systems, a small driven scatterer in a 2D waveguide should produce the same dipole-plus-wave interference, offering a laboratory check of the model at tabletop scales.
  • If the OAM density is indeed pinned to the hole edge, an emitter or absorber placed near the edge of a subwavelength hole could couple selectively to a single OAM channel, enabling compact angular-momentum routing in integrated photonics.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a distinction between two types of circularly symmetric vortex solutions of the 2D Helmholtz equation in a plane with a circular exclusion: the familiar "dark-core" type-I vortices described by J_ℓ(kr)e^{iℓφ}, and "bright" type-II vortices described by Y_ℓ(kr)e^{iℓφ}, which are singular at the origin but finite on the punctured plane. The authors claim that type-II vortices confine energy and orbital angular momentum to the subwavelength boundary of the hole, and they present three sets of examples: ocean tidal waves around islands (New Zealand, Madagascar), optical near fields around gold nanodiscs, and phonon-polariton near fields around nanoholes in h-BN. They also propose two generation mechanisms: interference of two orthogonal π/2-phase-shifted dipoles, and interference of a single dipole with a plane wave, with the latter captured by Eq. (2). The experimental s-SNOM images show clear phase winding and intensity maxima at the boundaries of the scatterers, with good agreement between simulation and experiment.

Significance. If the claimed subwavelength energy and OAM localization were correct, the paper would open a genuinely new route to angular-momentum confinement in wave systems across scales. The experimental data in Figs. 3 and 4 are of high quality and the identification of boundary-localized phase windings is convincing. The conceptual separation of J-type and Y-type vortex solutions is a useful pedagogical framing, and the paper explicitly connects the mathematical solutions to an existing body of work (e.g., Longuet-Higgins). However, the headline localization claim is not supported for the ℓ=±1 examples that the paper emphasizes, and the OAM normalization issue for the toy model is acknowledged by the authors but not resolved. The paper's value is in the recognition and experimental illustration of bright vortex-like fields around exclusions, but the quantitative confinement narrative needs substantial revision.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; Fig. 1(b); text near Eq. (1)] The central claim of subwavelength energy and OAM localization for the type-II vortex is not supported for ℓ=±1. For Y_1(kr) ≈ -2/(πkr) near the hole, the intensity |ψ|^2 ∝ 1/r^2, so the integrated energy in the annulus a<r<R scales as ln(R/a), growing without bound as R→∞; the OAM density Im(ψ*∂_φψ) shows the same logarithmic behavior. Thus the field is not confined to a subwavelength radius; it merely has a local intensity maximum at the boundary. The statement that "the energy in such vortex is concentrated near the hole boundary" is therefore incorrect for the free-space solutions shown. The experimental near-field images show bright boundary vortices, but their decay is due to evanescent or finite-domain effects, not to the Y_l solution. Please revise the claims to refer to local intensity maxima, or provide a quantitative measure of the energy/OAM fraction within a given radius for the actual fields.
  2. [Dipole interference models, Fig. 1(d), text after Eq. (2)] The OAM expectation value ⟨L_z⟩ for the field (2) is computed from an integral that is not absolutely convergent, as the authors acknowledge when they note that the total plane-wave energy diverges. The quoted result ∝ -cos δ therefore depends on an unspecified cutoff or regularization; different cutoffs can alter both the magnitude and even the sign of the contribution from the tail. To support the claim that the total OAM is dominated by the type-II vortex, the calculation should be repeated with an explicit large-radius cutoff R and the behavior as R→∞ should be analyzed, or the argument should be reformulated in terms of a locally defined OAM density rather than a global expectation value.
  3. [Tidal-wave vortices around islands; Fig. 2] The "very good approximation" of the tidal maps by the dipole+plane-wave model (2) is achieved with "suitably adjusted" parameters A and δ, fitted to the same HAMTIDE maps the model is then used to explain. This is a post-hoc curve fitting exercise and does not constitute a validation of the proposed generation mechanism. The additional assumption that New Zealand and Madagascar oscillate as M2 dipolar sources is not independently justified. The tidal images do demonstrate phase winding around islands, but the model comparison should be framed as an illustrative analogy rather than a quantitative confirmation.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Eq. (2) and throughout] The mathematical expressions in the submitted text appear garbled in places (e.g., the exponential and superscript characters in Eq. (2)); please ensure the final typeset version renders all equations correctly.
  2. [Fig. 1(c) caption] The caption states that "the energy is mostly concentrated in the bright type-II vortex around the dipole"; given the log-divergent tail of the ℓ=1 solution, this statement is misleading and should be rephrased to refer to the local intensity maximum.
  3. [Nanophotonic experiments, Fig. 3(c)] The role of the finite disc size and the specific boundary conditions at the disc edge are not discussed; the free-space Y_l solution does not satisfy any standard boundary condition (e.g., Dirichlet or Neumann) on a circle of radius a, so the connection between the experimental field and the mathematical solution should be clarified.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 3.0 of 10

Tidal demonstration is a post-hoc fit to the same HAMTIDE maps, but the central Helmholtz derivation and nanophotonic claims are independent.

  1. fitted input called prediction [Section 'Tidal-wave vortices around islands'; application of Eq. (2) to HAMTIDE maps (Fig. 2 and Supplementary Figure 2)]
    "Notably, our dipole and plane wave interference model (2) with adjusted parameters provides a very good approximation to the tidal wave maps around these islands, as shown in Fig. 2 and Supplementary Figure 2. A possible explanation of this agreement is that these massive islands oscillate under the Moon gravity force with the same M2 frequency ... and hence act as dipolar sources, which interfere with tidal near-plane wave propagating in the ocean around the island."

    The relative amplitude A and phase delta in Eq. (2) are free parameters, and the paper states they are 'adjusted' to the HAMTIDE maps. The same maps are then used both to exhibit the type-II vortex and to support the proposed mechanism of dipolar island sources interfering with a tidal near-plane wave. The agreement is therefore obtained by construction through fitting rather than by an independent prediction, so the tidal demonstration cannot independently validate the generation mechanism. This is a minor circularity because the vortex identification itself comes directly from the raw HAMTIDE data, and the central Helmholtz derivation does not depend on this fit.

full rationale

The core mathematical claim, that Helmholtz solutions proportional to Y_l(kr)e^{il phi} provide phase winding around an excluded disk, follows directly from the standard Bessel-function pair in Eq. (1) and is not circular: J_l and Y_l are independent textbook solutions, and associating Y_l with a pole truncated by a hole is a mathematical classification rather than a fitted result. The nanophotonic demonstrations rest on independent s-SNOM measurements and Maxwell simulations, and the author self-citations (e.g., the PhP crystal design of ref. 42 and the spin-orbit review of ref. 28) point to published, externally assessed work rather than to an unverified uniqueness theorem. The one substantive circularity is confined to the ocean-tide illustration: the dipole-plus-plane-wave model of Eq. (2) is said to provide a very good approximation to the HAMTIDE maps only after its parameters are adjusted to those same maps, making the agreement a post-hoc fit rather than an independent test. This does not affect the existence of the vortices, which is read directly from the tidal data. Separately, and not as a circularity finding, the claim of subwavelength localization is quantitatively problematic for l=+-1 because Y_1 yields |psi|^2 ~ 1/r^2 and a log-divergent total energy integral; that is a mathematical-correctness concern outside the circularity taxonomy.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The type-II vortex construction uses standard Helmholtz solutions and does not introduce free parameters by itself. Two ad hoc parameters enter only in the tidal illustration, where the dipole-plus-plane-wave model is fitted to the maps. The axioms are mostly domain reductions from vector 3D optics or stratified ocean dynamics to scalar 2D waves; the island-as-dipole mechanism and the finite-window OAM normalization are specific to this paper.

free parameters (2)
  • Relative amplitude A of the plane wave in the tidal model = not reported (adjusted)
    In Eq. (2), the plane-wave amplitude relative to the dipole is adjusted to match the HAMTIDE maps around New Zealand and Madagascar; this is a post-hoc fit, not a prediction.
  • Relative phase delta of the plane wave in the tidal model = not reported (adjusted)
    The mutual phase between the dipole and plane wave in Eq. (2) is adjusted to reproduce the observed tidal vortex pattern; the paper does not give the fitted value or uncertainty.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The measured E_z near-field component obeys a scalar 2D Helmholtz equation outside the scatterer or hole.
    Invoked to connect the experimental near-field images to the Bessel solutions in Eq. (1); the near field is actually vectorial and evanescent.
  • domain assumption A subwavelength scatterer or hole can be represented by a point dipole whose singular field is regularized by excluding the origin.
    Underpins the toy model Eq. (2) and the interpretation of the disc and nanohole experiments.
  • ad hoc to paper For M2 tides, islands behave as oscillating dipolar sources driven by Earth tides, interfering with a regional tidal plane wave.
    The paper calls this a possible explanation; it is a postulated mechanism without independent evidence.
  • ad hoc to paper The orbital angular momentum can be computed from the scalar field over a finite region even though the total plane-wave energy diverges.
    The toy-model OAM integral is not normalizable; the authors acknowledge this but still use the integral to infer nonzero OAM.
  • domain assumption The h-BN phonon-polariton modes are isotropic in the plane and dominated by the fundamental M0 mode.
    Required to reduce the anisotropic slab to a scalar 2D wave problem; stated in the phonon-polariton section.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of High-intensity wave vortices around subwavelength holes: from ocean tides to nanooptics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BEVSGD5K

@misc{pith2026250113860,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: High-intensity wave vortices around subwavelength holes: from ocean tides to nanooptics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BEVSGD5K}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.13860}
}
read the original abstract

Vortices are ubiquitous in nature; they appear in a variety of phenomena ranging from galaxy formation in astrophysics to topological defects in quantum fluids. In particular, wave vortices have attracted enormous attention and found applications in optics, acoustics, electron microscopy, etc. Such vortices carry quantized phase singularities accompanied by zero intensity in the center, and quantum-like orbital angular momentum, with the minimum localization scale of the wavelength. Here we describe a conceptually novel type of wave vortices, which can appear around arbitrarily small `holes' (i.e., excluded areas or defects) in a homogeneous 2D plane. Such vortices are characterized by high intensity and confinement at the edges of the hole and hence subwavelength localization of the angular momentum. We demonstrate the appearance of such vortices in: (i) optical near fields around metallic nanodiscs on a dielectric substrate, (ii) phonon-polariton fields around nanoholes in a polaritonic slab, and (iii) ocean tidal waves around islands of New Zealand and Madagascar. We also propose a simple toy model of the generation of such subwavelength vortices via the interference of a point-dipole source and a plane wave, where the vortex sign is controlled by the mutual phase between these waves. Our findings open avenues for subwavelength vortex/angular-momentum-based applications in various wave fields.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Dislocations in wave trains,

    J. F. Nye and M. V. Berry, “Dislocations in wave trains,” Proc. R. Soc. A 336 165 (1974)

    work page 1974

  2. [2]

    Allen, S

    L. Allen, S. M. Barnett, and M. J. Padgett (Eds.), Optical Angular Momentum (IoP Publishing, Bristol, 2003)

    work page 2003

  3. [3]

    J. P. Torres and L. Torner (Eds.), Twisted Photons (Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2011)

    work page 2011

  4. [4]

    An acoustical helicoidal wave transducer with applications for the alignment of ultrasonic and underwater systems,

    B. T. Hefner and P. L. Marston, “An acoustical helicoidal wave transducer with applications for the alignment of ultrasonic and underwater systems,” J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 106, 3313 (1999)

    work page 1999

  5. [5]

    The interference between the propagating Bloch wave and the dipoles induced in the holes can produce type-II vortices, according to the model (2)

    carrying in-plane momentum acquired from the obliquely incident light. The interference between the propagating Bloch wave and the dipoles induced in the holes can produce type-II vortices, according to the model (2). The PC is formed by a square array of circular holes (radius 𝑎=150 nm), with a period of 900 nm, designed to exhibit PhP Bragg resonances i...

  6. [6]

    A review on acoustic vortices: Generation, characterization, applications and perspectives,

    S. Guo, Z. Ya, P. Wu, and M. Wan, “A review on acoustic vortices: Generation, characterization, applications and perspectives,” J. Appl. Phys. 132, 210701 (2022)

    work page 2022

  7. [7]

    Observation of the Spin-Based Plasmonic Effect in Nanoscale Structures,

    Y. Gorodetski, A. Niv, V. Kleiner, and E. Hasman, “Observation of the Spin-Based Plasmonic Effect in Nanoscale Structures,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 043903 (2008)

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    Orbital Angular Momentum in Nanoplasmonic Vortices,

    E. Prinz, M. Hartelt, G. Spektor, M. Orenstein, and M. Aeschlimann, “Orbital Angular Momentum in Nanoplasmonic Vortices,” ACS Photonics 10, 340 (2023)

    work page 2023

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    Elastic orbital angular momentum transfer from an elastic pipe to a fluid,

    G. J. Chaplain, J. M. De Ponti, and T. A. Starkey, “Elastic orbital angular momentum transfer from an elastic pipe to a fluid,” Commun. Phys. 5, 279 (2022)

    2022

  2. [10]

    Wave-based liquid-interface metamaterials,

    N. Francois, H. Xia, H. Punzmann, P. W. Fontana, and M. Shats, “Wave-based liquid-interface metamaterials,” Nat. Commun. 8, 14325 (2016)

    2016

  3. [11]

    Observation of stationary vortex arrays in rotating superfluid helium,

    E. J. Yarmchuk, M. J. V. Gordon, and R. E. Packard, “Observation of stationary vortex arrays in rotating superfluid helium,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 43, 214 (1979)

    1979

  4. [12]

    Rotating trapped Bose-Einstein condensates,

    A. L. Fetter, “Rotating trapped Bose-Einstein condensates,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 81, 647 (2009)

    2009

  5. [13]

    Production and application of electron vortex beams,

    J. Verbeeck, H. Tian, and P. Schattschneider, “Production and application of electron vortex beams,” Nature 467, 301 (2010)

    2010

  6. [14]

    Theory and applications of free-electron vortex states,

    K. Y. Bliokh, I. P. Ivanov, G. Guzzinati, L. Clark, R. Van Boxem, A. Beche, R. Juchtmans, M. A. Alonso, P. Schattschneider, F. Nori, and J. Verbeeck, “Theory and applications of free-electron vortex states,” Phys. Rep. 690, 1 (2017)

    2017

  7. [15]

    Controlling neutron orbital angular momentum,

    C. W. Clark, R. Barankov, M. G. Huber, M. Arif, D. G. Cory, and D. A. Pushin, “Controlling neutron orbital angular momentum,” Nature 525, 504 (2015)

    2015

  8. [16]

    Vortex beams of atoms and molecules,

    A. Luski, Y. Segev, R. David, O. Bitton, H. Nadler, A. R. Barnea, A. Gorlach, O. Cheshnovsky, I. Kaminer, and E. Narevicius, “Vortex beams of atoms and molecules,” Science 373, 1105 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    Direct observation of transfer of angular momentum to absorptive particles from a laser beam with a phase singularity,

    H. He, M. E. J. Friese, N. R. Heckenberg, and H. Rubinsztein-Dunlop, “Direct observation of transfer of angular momentum to absorptive particles from a laser beam with a phase singularity,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 826 (1995)

    1995

  10. [18]

    A revolution in optical manipulation,

    D. G. Grier, “A revolution in optical manipulation,” Nature 424, 810 (2003)

    2003

  11. [19]

    Overcoming the Rayleigh criterion limit with optical vortices,

    F. Tamburini, G. Anzolin, G. Umbriaco, A. Bianchini, and C. Barbieri, “Overcoming the Rayleigh criterion limit with optical vortices,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 163903 (2006)

    2006

  12. [20]

    Orbital angular momentum light in microscopy,

    M. Ritsch-Marte, “Orbital angular momentum light in microscopy,” Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A 375, 20150437 (2017)

    2017

  13. [21]

    Entanglement of orbital angular momentum states of photons,

    A. Mair, A. Vaziri, G. Weihs, and A. Zeilinger, “Entanglement of orbital angular momentum states of photons,” Nature 412 313 (2001)

    2001

  14. [22]

    Quantum correlations in optical angle–orbital angular momentum variables,

    J. Leach, B. Jack, J. Romero, A. K. Jha, A. M. Yao, S. Franke-Arnold, D. G. Ireland, R. W Boyd, S. M. Barnett, and M. J. Padgett, “Quantum correlations in optical angle–orbital angular momentum variables,” Science 329, 662 (2010)

    2010

  15. [23]

    Terabit-Scale Orbital Angular Momentum Mode Division Multiplexing in Fibers,

    N. Bozinovic, Y. Yue, Y. Ren, M. Tur, P. Kristensen, H. Huang, A. E. Willner, and S. Ramachandran, “Terabit-Scale Orbital Angular Momentum Mode Division Multiplexing in Fibers,” Science 340, 1545 (2013)

    2013

  16. [24]

    Twisted light transmission over 143 km,

    M. Krenn, J. Handsteiner, M. Fink, R. Fickler, R. Ursin, M. Malik, and A. Zeilinger, “Twisted light transmission over 143 km,” Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 113, 13648 (2016)

    2016

  17. [25]

    Experimental verification of an optical vortex coronagraph,

    J. H. Lee, G. Foo, E. G. Johnson, G. A. Swartzlander, “Experimental verification of an optical vortex coronagraph,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 97, 053901 (2006). 11

    2006

  18. [26]

    Twisting of light around rotating black holes,

    F. Tamburini, B. Thidé, G. Molina-Terriza, and G. Anzolin, “Twisting of light around rotating black holes,” Nat. Phys. 7, 195 (2011)

    2011

  19. [27]

    Plasmonic Aharonov-Bohm effect: Optical spin as the magnetic flux parameter,

    Y. Gorodetski, S. Nechayev, V. Kleiner, and E. Hasman, “Plasmonic Aharonov-Bohm effect: Optical spin as the magnetic flux parameter,” Phys. Rev. B. 82, 125433 (2010)

    2010

  20. [28]

    Ultrafast generation and control of an electron vortex beam via chiral plasmonic near fields,

    G. M. Vanacore, G. Berruto, I. Madan, E. Pomarico, P. Biagioni, R. J. Lamb, D. McGrouther, O. Reinhardt, I. Kaminer, B. Barwick, H. Larocque, V. Grillo, E. Karimi, F. J. García de Abajo, and F. Carbone, “Ultrafast generation and control of an electron vortex beam via chiral pl...

    2019

  21. [29]

    Spin-orbit interactions of light,

    K. Y. Bliokh, F. J. Rodríguez-Fortuño, F. Nori, and A. V. Zayats, “Spin-orbit interactions of light,” Nat. Photonics 9, 796 (2015)

    2015

  22. [30]

    No general relation between phase vortices and orbital angular momentum,

    M. V. Berry and W. Liu, “No general relation between phase vortices and orbital angular momentum,” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 55, 374001 (2022)

    2022

  23. [31]

    Making waves in physics,

    M. V. Berry, “Making waves in physics,” Nature 403, 21 (2000)

    2000

  24. [32]

    D. E. Cartwright, Tides: A Scientific History (Cambridge University Press, 2000)

    2000

  25. [33]

    Inferring deep ocean tidal energy dissipation from the global high-resolution data-assimilative HAMTIDE model,

    E. Taguchi, D. Stammer, and W. Zahel, “Inferring deep ocean tidal energy dissipation from the global high-resolution data-assimilative HAMTIDE model,” J. Geophys. Res. Oceans 119, 4573 (2014)

    2014

  26. [34]

    On the trapping of long-period waves round islands,

    M. S. Longuet-Higgins, “On the trapping of long-period waves round islands,” J. Fluid Mech. 37, 773 (1969)

    1969

  27. [35]

    Coastal-trapped waves and wind-driven currents over the continental shelf,

    K. H. Brink, “Coastal-trapped waves and wind-driven currents over the continental shelf,” Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. 23, 389 (1991)

    1991

  28. [36]

    Earth tides,

    P. Melchior, “Earth tides,” Surv. Geophys. 1, 275 (1974)

    1974

  29. [37]

    Mapping the near fields of plasmonic nanoantennas by scattering-type scanning near-field optical microscopy

    T. Neuman, P. Alonso-González, A. Garcia-Etxarri, M. Schnell, R. Hillenbrand, and J. Aizpurua, “Mapping the near fields of plasmonic nanoantennas by scattering-type scanning near-field optical microscopy”, Laser & Phton. Rev. 9, 637 (2015)

    2015

  30. [38]

    Polaritons in van der Waals materials,

    D. N. Basov, M. M. Fogler, and F. J. García de Abajo, “Polaritons in van der Waals materials,” Science 354, 195 (2016)

    2016

  31. [39]

    Extreme light confinement and control in low-symmetry phonon-polaritonic crystals,

    E. Galiffi, G. Carini, X. Ni, G. Álvarez-Pérez, S. Yves, E. M. Renzi, R. Nolen, S. Wasserroth, M. Wolf, P. Alonso-Gonzalez, A. Paarmann, and A. Alù, “Extreme light confinement and control in low-symmetry phonon-polaritonic crystals,” Nat. Rev. Mater. 9, 9 (2024)

    2024

  32. [40]

    Spin-orbit-locked hyperbolic polariton vortices carrying reconfigurable topological charges,

    M. Wang, G. Hu, S. Chand, M. Cotrufo, Y. Abate, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, G. Grosso, C.-W. Qiu, and A. Alù, “Spin-orbit-locked hyperbolic polariton vortices carrying reconfigurable topological charges,” eLight 2, 12 (2022)

    2022

  33. [41]

    Dynamics of optical vortices in van der Waals materials,

    Y. Kurman, R. Dahan, H.H. Shenfux, G. Rosolen, E. Janzen, J.H. Edgar, F.H.L. Koppens, and I. Kaminer, “Dynamics of optical vortices in van der Waals materials,” Optica 10, 612 (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    Tunable Phonon Polaritons in Atomically Thin van der Waals Crystals of Boron Nitride,

    S. Dai, Z. Fei, Q. Ma, A.S. Rodin, M. Wagner, A.S. McLeod, M.K. Liu, W. Gannett, W. Regan, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. Thiemens, G. Dominguez, A.H. Castro Neto, A. Zettl, F. Keilmann, P. Jarillo-Herrero, M.M. Fogler, D.N. Basov, “Tunable Phonon Polaritons in Atomically Thin ...

    2014

  35. [43]

    Deeply subwavelength phonon-polaritonic crystal made of a van der Waals material,

    F. J. Alfaro-Mozaz, S. G. Rodrigo, P. Alonso-González, S. Vélez, I. Dolado, F. Casanova, L. E. Hueso, L. Martín-Moreno, R. Hillenbrand, and A. Y. Nikitin, “Deeply subwavelength phonon-polaritonic crystal made of a van der Waals material,” Nat. Commun. 10, 42 (2019)

    2019

  36. [44]

    Orbital angular momentum microlaser,

    P. Miao, Z. Zhang, J. Sun, W. Walasik, S. Longhi, N. M. Litchinitser, and L. Feng, “Orbital angular momentum microlaser,” Science 353, 464 (2016)

    2016

  37. [45]

    Ultrafast control of vortex microlasers,

    C. Huang, C. Zhang, S. Xiao, Y. Wang, Y. Fan, Y. Liu, N. Zhang, G. Qu, H. Ji, J. Han, L. Ge, Y. Kivshar, and Q. Song, “Ultrafast control of vortex microlasers,” Science 367, 1018 (2020)

    2020

  38. [46]

    Creating High-Harmonic Beams with Controlled Orbital Angular Momentum,

    G. Gariepy, J. Leach, K. T. Kim, T. J. Hammond, E. Frumker, R. W. Boyd, and P. B. Corkum, “Creating High-Harmonic Beams with Controlled Orbital Angular Momentum,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 153901 (2014)

    2014

  39. [47]

    Highly efficient vortex generation at the nanoscale,

    Q. Chen, G. Qu, J. Yin, Y. Wang, Z. Ji, W. Yang, Y. Wang, Z. Yin, Q. Song, Y. Kivshar, and S. Xiao, “Highly efficient vortex generation at the nanoscale,” Nat. Nanotechnol. (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41565-024-01636-y

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.