Pith. sign in

REVIEW 8 minor 112 references

Classical and quantum spin liquids

T0 review · 0 major / 8 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Spin liquids are magnetic phases that remain disordered down to zero temperature and can be classified by correlations and excitations.

desk verdict A competent, honest review of classical and quantum spin liquids; no new results, but the classification survey is accurate and appropriately caveated. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.14433 v1 pith:ZP2QKUWC submitted 2025-01-24 cond-mat.str-el

Sylvain Capponi This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords spinliquidsfrustratedmagnetismclassicalquantumprojectivesymmetrygroupflatbandstopologicalorderfractionalization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This review argues that a spin system need not order as the temperature approaches zero: both classical and quantum magnets can stay magnetically disordered all the way down, in phases called spin liquids. Because these phases have no local order parameter, the review's central question is how to tell them apart. It presents two classification schemes: classical spin liquids are grouped by the flat-band structure of their excitation spectrum in models with Hamiltonians of the form $H = (J/2)\sum_p \mathbf{S}_p^2$, while quantum spin liquids are grouped by their many-body spectrum and by the emergent gauge field and fractionalized excitations that appear in slave-particle descriptions. The stakes are concrete: if these classifications hold, disordered magnets are not a single featureless phase but a family of distinct states with measurable correlations, excitations, and topological properties.

What carries the argument

The carrying tools are two classification schemes. For classical spin liquids, the key object is the flat-band analysis of the vector $\mathbf{L}(q)$ in the Hamiltonian $H = (J/2)\sum_p \mathbf{S}_p^2$, together with Maxwellian counting of zero modes; this determines whether the groundstate degeneracy is extensive and what correlations result, such as dipolar Coulomb-phase correlations with pinch points. For quantum spin liquids, the key mechanism is the parton or slave-particle representation of spin operators, which recasts the spin Hamiltonian as a quadratic mean-field theory of spinons coupled to an emergent gauge field; the projective symmetry group (PSG) then classifies the symmetry-allowed mean-field ansätze. Exact solvable models - the toric code, the Kitaev honeycomb model, and the Rokhsar-Kivelson dimer model - anchor the classification by providing rigorous examples of gapped and gapless spin liquids.

What would settle it

A rigorous construction of a featureless gapped quantum groundstate on the pyrochlore or diamond lattice with one $S=1/2$ spin per unit cell would contradict the Lieb-Schultz-Mattis constraints the review relies on; conversely, a classical Heisenberg model with extensive degeneracy that cannot be written in the form $H = (J/2)\sum_p \mathbf{S}_p^2$ and has a correlation structure not predicted by flat-band analysis would show that the classical classification is incomplete.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that magnetic order is not inevitable: there exist many-body spin systems, both classical and quantum, whose ground states remain disordered at zero temperature, and these disordered phases can still be distinguished by qualitative features. For classical spin liquids, the defining feature is an extensive groundstate degeneracy, and the review presents a classification based on the flat bands of the coupling vector $\mathbf{L}(q)$ that appears when the Hamiltonian takes the form $H = (J/2)\sum_p \mathbf{S}_p^2$; the number of dispersive modes, pinch points in structure factors, and higher-rank gauge constraints separate different phases. For quantum spin liquids, the absence of symmetry breaking is not enough: the review distinguishes gapped from gapless spectra, topological degeneracies, and chiral states, and uses slave-particle mean-field theory to classify phases by the emergent gauge group ($Z_2$, $U(1)$, $SU(2)$) and the spinon spectrum, together with Lieb-Schultz-Mattis constraints that forbid featureless groundstates in many lattices. The paper shows through exact and numerical examples that stable spin liquids exist, from the toric code and the Kitaev honeycomb model to quantum dimer models and candidate Dirac spin liquids.

Load-bearing premise

The taxonomy rests on two model assumptions that the paper itself flags as limited: classical spin liquids are classified through Hamiltonians of the form $H = (J/2)\sum_p \mathbf{S}_p^2$, and quantum spin liquids through mean-field parton descriptions whose stability beyond mean-field is not established.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Classical spin liquids exist in simple frustrated models such as the triangular Ising antiferromagnet and the Heisenberg kagome, checkerboard, and pyrochlore antiferromagnets, where the groundstate degeneracy is extensive and correlations can be algebraic.
  • The flat-band classification distinguishes classical spin liquids by their pinch points and dispersive modes, and it extends to higher-rank tensor gauge structures with fracton-like excitations.
  • Quantum spin liquids come in three spectral types - unique gapped, degenerate gapped, and gapless - and the gapped topological ones host anyons, groundstate degeneracy that depends on the manifold, and protected edge excitations.
  • Lieb-Schultz-Mattis-type constraints rule out featureless gapped groundstates in many lattices, so a disordered magnet in those settings must be a spin liquid with topological or fractionalized character.
  • The parton/PSG classification is a mean-field construction; the review states that whether it survives beyond mean-field, and whether bosonic and fermionic descriptions connect, remains open.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the flat-band classification generalizes beyond the corner-sharing form of the Hamiltonian, it would give a practical recipe: compute the coupling vector $\mathbf{L}(q)$ for any frustrated model and read off from the flatness of its bands whether a classical spin liquid is possible.
  • The quantum classification suggests an experimental route: measuring the dynamical structure factor and thermal transport could distinguish a gapped $Z_2$ spin liquid from a gapless Dirac spin liquid, since the former shows broad continuum scattering from anyons while the latter has power-law signatures.
  • Treating classical spin liquids as parent states implies a design strategy for quantum spin liquids: start from a classical cooperative paramagnet and tune quantum fluctuations, so models that inherit classical flat bands become natural candidates for stable quantum disordered groundstates.
  • The review's caveat about mean-field validity points to a concrete check: comparing fermionic and bosonic slave-particle classifications of the same lattice on small clusters with exact diagonalization or tensor networks could reveal whether the two descriptions agree on which spin liquids are stable.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

0 major / 8 minor

Summary. This manuscript, submitted by Sylvain Capponi to Comptes Rendus Physique as lecture notes, surveys the physics of classical and quantum spin liquids. For classical spin liquids, it covers the Ising antiferromagnet on the triangular lattice, vertex and dimer models, continuous-spin Heisenberg models on corner-sharing lattices, and the flat-band classification based on Eqs. (4)-(5). For quantum spin liquids, it discusses definitions, Lieb-Schultz-Mattis-type constraints, parton and PSG classifications, exact solutions (toric code, Kitaev honeycomb model), quantum dimer and chiral spin models, and gapless spin liquids. The paper's central claim, as stated in the abstract, is that magnetic systems can remain disordered down to zero temperature and that such spin-liquid phases, while lacking a local order parameter, can be classified through the nature of their correlations and elementary excitations.

Significance. If published, this review would provide a readable and reasonably current introduction to a broad, active field. Its main strengths are its balanced use of exact solutions and numerical evidence, its clear separation of the classical and quantum cases, and its explicit acknowledgment of the limitations of the classifications it presents, particularly in Sec. 4 (classical classification relies on models of the form of Eq. (4); quantum PSG classification is mean-field based). The paper is appropriately cautious about open questions, such as the stability of the Dirac spin liquid in (2+1)d and the completeness of the flat-band classification. Since this is an invited review rather than a research paper, its value lies in the accuracy and pedagogical completeness of the survey rather than in new results; the manuscript largely achieves this goal.

minor comments (8)
  1. [Sec. 2.4, Eq. (5)] The notation in Eq. (5) is cryptic: the meaning of the indices ℓ and m, the components of L(q), and the relation to the flat-band analysis are not made explicit. Please define these objects carefully or refer the reader to a specific derivation in Refs. [26,27] with a short explanation.
  2. [Sec. 3.5.3, Eq. (14)] The dimer diagrams in the QDM Hamiltonian (Eq. (14)) are not visible in the text; they appear only as empty symbols. The published version must include the actual diagrams or a well-defined notational alternative.
  3. [Sec. 3.5.3, toric code] The sentence "four types of excitations (all with quantum dimensions d_i = 1): trivial, e, m, f = e − m pair" is unclear: the notation "f = e − m pair" should read "f = e × m (fusion product of e and m)" to avoid confusion about the anyon types.
  4. [Sec. 3.5.3, BFG model] The statement that the low-energy model is an effective QDM-like model "on the dual triangular lattice, where there are exactly three dimers per site" is ambiguous. Please specify what a dimer represents in this mapping and what the constraint actually is (e.g., exactly three dimers incident to each vertex of the triangular lattice).
  5. [Sec. 3.2] In the bullet list following the LSM discussion, the sentence "the groundstate of aS = 1/2 hamiltonian cannot be featureless (case (i)) [40]:" has a missing space after the article and the colon introduces a list that is not grammatically complete. Please rephrase and end each bullet with a period.
  6. [Sec. 2.3] The sentence "For instance, on a triangular lattice, one finds a unique groundstate (up to symmetries) with a 120-degree spiral order" is potentially misleading: the ground-state manifold is a continuum of states related by global SO(3) rotations (and chiralities). Consider saying "a ground-state manifold with 120-degree spiral order" instead.
  7. [Sec. 4] The expression "weird CSL analogous to Z2 QSL" is too informal for a review article; suggest replacing "weird" with "exotic" or "unconventional."
  8. [Throughout] There are several typographical and spacing issues (e.g., "In such trivial phase" should be "In such a trivial phase"; "XLV . On reciprocal figures" in Ref. [22]; missing spaces in several places). I recommend a careful proofreading pass before publication.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the review's classifications and examples are drawn from external, independent literature, and its own caveats identify open assumptions rather than circular reductions.

full rationale

This paper is an invited review, not an original derivation or fitting exercise. The central claim is descriptive: that classical and quantum spin liquids exist and can be classified. Every substantive classification scheme is reported from independent external sources: the Maxwellian counting for classical spin liquids follows Chalker and references therein; the flat-band/L(q) classification cites Refs. [26,27]; the PSG and parton mean-field classifications cite Wen and subsequent works. There is no fitted parameter that is later renamed as a prediction, and no target result is assumed in an input. The author's self-citations (Refs. [65,79,88,91,97]) are numerical or model-construction papers cited for specific results, such as magnetization plateaus or chiral spin liquid studies; they are not used to justify the classification framework's validity. The closest load-bearing assumptions are the restrictions of the classical classification to Hamiltonians of the form H = (J/2) Σ_p S_p^2 and the mean-field nature of the quantum PSG classification. However, the manuscript explicitly acknowledges both limitations: 'At the moment, the classification mostly relies on the specific form of some models as in Eq. 4 and it would be valuable in the future to go beyond' and 'It would be crucial to understand if this classification is valid beyond mean-field'. These are honest statements about open questions, not circular reductions. The review is therefore self-contained as a survey against external benchmarks, and no circularity is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

This review article introduces no free parameters or invented entities. Its central narrative rests on the representativeness of the chosen models and the correctness of the cited literature, as itemized above.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Magnetic systems can be modeled as localized spins on regular lattices with two-body interactions, and this captures the essential physics of frustration.
    Sec. 1 explicitly restricts to localized spins and excludes itinerant magnetism and disorder, which delimits the scope of all subsequent classifications.
  • domain assumption The cited exact solutions (e.g., Wannier, Lieb, Baxter, Kitaev) and numerical evidence for spin liquid phases are correct.
    The review relies entirely on these external results to establish the existence of classical and quantum spin liquids; it does not re-derive them.
  • domain assumption The classification frameworks reviewed (flat-band spectrum for CSL, PSG/parton and spectrum-based for QSL) are representative of the full set of spin liquids.
    Sec. 4 states the classical classification 'mostly relies on the specific form of some models as in Eq. 4' and questions the mean-field validity of the quantum classification.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Classical and quantum spin liquids." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/ZP2QKUWC

@misc{pith2026250114433,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Classical and quantum spin liquids},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/ZP2QKUWC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.14433}
}
read the original abstract

When considering magnetic systems in the thermodynamic limit and at low enough temperature, one finds typically magnetically ordered phases. In contrast, in the high-temperature regime, the interactions between the spin degrees of freedom become less relevant and the system loses its order: this is a paramagnet. This phenomenon of phase transition has been well understood using statistical mechanics and simple modelling. In these short lecture notes, we will review the possibility that a many-body magnetic system may remain magnetically disordered down to zero-temperature, both for classical or quantum spins. These exotic phases of matter are known, respectively, as classical and quantum spin liquids. We will address in particular the question of classification of these classical or quantum disordered phases. Indeed, while they have no local order parameter by definition, they can still possess different qualitative features related e.g. to the nature of their correlations or elementary excitations, which could be probed experimentally.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.14433 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Structures of some lattices. From top left to bottom right: two-dimensional (2d) triangular, kagome, checkerboard and three-dimensional (3d) pyrochlore. For the checkerboard lattice, we have highlighted in green one plaquette phase groundstate in the quantum S = 1/2 case. can exist a large parameter regime where a cooperative paramagnet is the correct picture and the system remains magnetically disordered. [7] We wi… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Triangular Ising antiferromagnet. Starting from a perfect Néel order on some honeycomb lattice (spins in red and green), the additional spins can be in any σ = ±1 state, leading to an extensive degeneracy. having antiparallel spins on every bond. This has been analyzed by Wannier in 1950 on the triangular lattice [5], see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. The six allowed configurations on the square lattice such that at each vertex, there are exactly 2 incoming and 2 outgoing arrows (ice rule). A simple estimate of the number of configurations for N sites can be found using Pauling’s estimate [14]: since there are only 6 valid configurations around each vertex, instead of 24 = 16, if one neglects correlations, there are approximately 22N (6/16)N states, which leads t… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (7 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Example of a valence-bond configuration on the square lattice. Each dimer corresponds to a singlet state made of two spins-1/2. An equal weight superposition of all coverings is known as the RVB wavefunction. band structure, the gap closing points, the number of pinch …
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Shastry-Sutherland lattice for which the product of singlets on the J bonds is an exact eigenstate and the unique groundstate for small enough J ′ /J. On the other hand, we know that in condensed matter systems, some gapped phases can be nontrivial in the sense of havi…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Three different possibilities for the many-body spectrum: (i) a unique ground￾state and a finite gap ∆; (ii) degenerate groundstates and a finite gap ∆; (iii) gapless. simplicity, we will assume H to be short-ranged and local, most of the time with some U(1) or SU(2) s…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Illustration of Kitaev’s toric code model on the square lattice. where a spontaneous dimerization occurs, or in various 2d spin models with columnar or pla￾quette orders, e.g. J1-J2-J3 S = 1/2 on the honeycomb lattice [62] or S = 1/2 on the checkerboard lattice [63] (s…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Illustration of Kitaev’s honeycomb model. e, m, f = e −m pair. e and m have π-shift mutual statistics, hence they are anyons (abelian) and f -excitations behave as fermions. This solution was a breakthrough since it has shown the existence of a topological phase, analo…
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Left: A dimer configuration on the square lattice. Flippable plaquettes are shaded. Right: Flippable plaquettes contribute a diagonal term v to the Hamiltonian and can be flipped with amplitude −t (t > 0) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Schematic phase diagram of the QDM on the square lattice as a function of v/t: the critical groundstate at the RK point is unstable to crystalline phases such as columnar, plaquette or staggered. As a conclusion, QDM models can exhibit various nonmagnetic phases inclu…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

112 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    More Is Different

    P . W . Anderson, “More Is Different”, Science 177 (1972), no. 4047, p. 393-396, https://www.science.org/doi/abs/ 10.1126/science.177.4047.393, https://arxiv.org/abs/https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.177.4047. 393

    doi:10.1126/science.177.4047.393 1972

  2. [2]

    Strongly Geometrically Frustrated Magnets

    A. P . Ramirez, “Strongly Geometrically Frustrated Magnets”,Annual Review of Materials Research24 (1994), no. Vol- ume 24„ p. 453-480, https://www.annualreviews.org/content/journals/10.1146/annurev.ms.24.080194.002321

    arXiv 1994

  3. [3]

    Lacroix, F

    C. Lacroix, F . Mila, P . Mendels,Introduction to frustrated magnetism : materials, experiments, theory, Springer series in solid-state sciences, 164, Springer, Berlin, 2011

    2011

  4. [4]

    Quantum spin liquid states

    Y. Zhou, K. Kanoda, T .-K. Ng, “Quantum spin liquid states”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89 (2017), p. 025003, https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.025003

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys.89.025003 2017

  5. [5]

    Antiferromagnetism. The Triangular Ising Net

    G. H. Wannier, “ Antiferromagnetism. The Triangular Ising Net”, Phys. Rev. 79 (1950), p. 357-364, https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.79.357

    doi:10.1103/physrev.79.357 1950

  6. [6]

    Order as an effect of disorder

    Villain, J., Bidaux, R., Carton, J.-P ., Conte, R., “Order as an effect of disorder”,J. Phys. France41 (1980), no. 11, p. 1263- 1272, https://doi.org/10.1051/jphys:0198000410110126300

    doi:10.1051/jphys:0198000410110126300 1980

  7. [7]

    Insulating spin glasses

    J. Villain, “Insulating spin glasses”, Zeitschrift fur Physik B Condensed Matter 33 (1979), no. 1, p. 31-42

    1979

  8. [8]

    Spin liquids and frustrated magnetism

    J. T . Chalker, “Spin liquids and frustrated magnetism”, in Topological Aspects of Condensed Matter Physics: Lecture Notes of the Les Houches Summer School: Volume 103, August 2014 , Oxford University Press, 01 2017, https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198785781.003.0003, https://arxiv.org/abs/https://academic.oup. com/book/0/chapter/203968137/chapter-...

    arXiv 2014

Show all 112 references
  1. [9]

    100 Years of the (Critical) Ising Model on the Hypercubic Lattice

    H. Duminil-Copin, “100 Years of the (Critical) Ising Model on the Hypercubic Lattice”, 2022, https://arxiv.org/abs/ 2208.00864, https://arxiv.org/abs/2208.00864

    2022 arXiv

  2. [10]

    Fracton Models on General Three-Dimensional Manifolds

    W . Shirley, K. Slagle, Z. Wang, X. Chen, “Fracton Models on General Three-Dimensional Manifolds”, Phys. Rev. X 8 (2018), p. 031051, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.8.031051

    2018 doi

  3. [11]

    Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models and beyond: Window into non- Fermi liquids

    D. Chowdhury, A. Georges, O. Parcollet, S. Sachdev, “Sachdev-Ye-Kitaev models and beyond: Window into non- Fermi liquids”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 94 (2022), p. 035004, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.94.035004. 18 Sylvain Capponi

    2022 doi

  4. [12]

    Partial lifting of degeneracy in the J1−J2−J3 Ising antiferromagnet on the kagome lattice

    J. Colbois, B. Vanhecke, L. Vanderstraeten, A. Smerald, F . Verstraete, F . Mila, “Partial lifting of degeneracy in the J1−J2−J3 Ising antiferromagnet on the kagome lattice”, Phys. Rev. B 106 (2022), p. 174403, https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.106.174403

    2022 doi

  5. [13]

    R. J. Baxter, Exactly solved models in statistical mechanics, Academic, London, 1982; Dover, New York, 2007

    1982

  6. [14]

    The Structure and Entropy of Ice and of Other Crystals with Some Randomness of Atomic Ar- rangement

    L. Pauling, “The Structure and Entropy of Ice and of Other Crystals with Some Randomness of Atomic Ar- rangement”, Journal of the American Chemical Society 57 (1935), no. 12, p. 2680-2684, https://doi.org/10.1021/ ja01315a102, https://arxiv.org/abs/https://doi.org/10.1021/ja01315a102

    1935 doi

  7. [15]

    Residual Entropy of Square Ice

    E. H. Lieb, “Residual Entropy of Square Ice”, Phys. Rev. 162 (1967), p. 162-172, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRev.162.162

    1967

  8. [16]

    The Entropy of Water and the Third Law of Thermodynamics. The Heat Capacity of Ice from 15 to 273 K

    W . F . Giauque, J. W . Stout, “The Entropy of Water and the Third Law of Thermodynamics. The Heat Capacity of Ice from 15 to 273 K.”,Journal of the American Chemical Society58 (1936), no. 7, p. 1144-1150, https://doi.org/10.1021/ ja01298a023, https://arxiv.org/abs/https://doi...

    1936 doi

  9. [17]

    The history of spin ice

    S. T . Bramwell, M. J. Harris, “The history of spin ice”, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 32 (2020), no. 37, p. 374010, https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/1361-648X/ab8423

    2020 doi

  10. [18]

    Magnetic monopoles in spin ice

    C. Castelnovo, R. Moessner, S. L. Sondhi, “Magnetic monopoles in spin ice”, Nature 451 (2008), no. 7174, p. 42, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature06433

    2008 doi

  11. [19]

    The statistics of dimers on a lattice: I. The number of dimer arrangements on a quadratic lattice

    P . Kasteleyn, “The statistics of dimers on a lattice: I. The number of dimer arrangements on a quadratic lattice”, Physica 27 (1961), no. 12, p. 1209-1225, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0031891461900635

    1961

  12. [20]

    Dimer problem in statistical mechanics-an exact result

    H. N. V . Temperley, M. E. Fisher, “Dimer problem in statistical mechanics-an exact result”, The Philosophical Magazine: A Journal of Theoretical Experimental and Applied Physics 6 (1961), no. 68, p. 1061-1063, https://doi. org/10.1080/14786436108243366, https://arxiv.org/abs/...

    1961 doi

  13. [21]

    Theory of Dipole Interaction in Crystals

    J. M. Luttinger, L. Tisza, “Theory of Dipole Interaction in Crystals”, Phys. Rev. 70 (1946), p. 954-964, https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRev.70.954

    1946 doi

  14. [22]

    XLV . On reciprocal figures and diagrams of forces

    J. C. Maxwell, “XLV . On reciprocal figures and diagrams of forces ”,The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosoph- ical Magazine and Journal of Science 27 (1864), no. 182, p. 250-261, https://doi.org/10.1080/14786446408643663, https://arxiv.org/abs/https://doi.org/10.1080/14786...

    doi

  15. [23]

    Low-temperature properties of classical geometrically frustrated antiferromagnets

    R. Moessner, J. T . Chalker, “Low-temperature properties of classical geometrically frustrated antiferromagnets”, Phys. Rev. B 58 (1998), p. 12049-12062, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.58.12049

    1998 doi

  16. [24]

    Properties of a Classical Spin Liquid: The Heisenberg Pyrochlore Antiferromagnet

    R. Moessner, J. T . Chalker, “Properties of a Classical Spin Liquid: The Heisenberg Pyrochlore Antiferromagnet”,Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998), p. 2929-2932, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.80.2929

    1998 doi

  17. [25]

    Hidden order in a frustrated system: Properties of the Heisenberg Kagomé antiferromagnet

    J. T . Chalker, P . C. W . Holdsworth, E. F . Shender, “Hidden order in a frustrated system: Properties of the Heisenberg Kagomé antiferromagnet”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 (1992), p. 855-858, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.68. 855

    1992 doi

  18. [26]

    Combined approach to analyze and classify families of classical spin liquids

    N. Davier, F . A. Gómez Albarracín, H. D. Rosales, P . Pujol, “Combined approach to analyze and classify families of classical spin liquids”, Phys. Rev. B 108 (2023), p. 054408, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.054408

    2023 doi

  19. [27]

    Classification of classical spin liquids: Typology and resulting landscape

    H. Yan, O. Benton, R. Moessner, A. H. Nevidomskyy, “Classification of classical spin liquids: Typology and resulting landscape”, Phys. Rev. B 110 (2024), p. L020402, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.110.L020402

    2024 doi

  20. [28]

    Quantum spin liquids: a review

    L. Savary, L. Balents, “Quantum spin liquids: a review”, Reports on Progress in Physics 80 (2016), no. 1, p. 016502, https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/80/1/016502

    2016 doi

  21. [29]

    Resonating valence bonds: A new kind of insulator?

    P . Anderson, “Resonating valence bonds: A new kind of insulator?”, Mater . Res. Bull. 8 (1973), no. 2, p. 153-160, http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6TXC-48DYHGJ-BY/2/c8776a1d5fd4d78e8e2c4e37a53a0c73

    1973

  22. [30]

    Excitation Spectrum of a Dimerized Next-Neighbor Antiferromagnetic Chain

    B. S. Shastry, B. Sutherland, “Excitation Spectrum of a Dimerized Next-Neighbor Antiferromagnetic Chain”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 47 (1981), p. 964-967, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.47.964

    1981 doi

  23. [31]

    Entanglement Spectrum as a Generalization of Entanglement Entropy: Identification of Topological Order in Non-Abelian Fractional Quantum Hall Effect States

    H. Li, F . D. M. Haldane, “Entanglement Spectrum as a Generalization of Entanglement Entropy: Identification of Topological Order in Non-Abelian Fractional Quantum Hall Effect States”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101 (2008), p. 010504, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.010504

    2008 doi

  24. [32]

    Quantum orders and symmetric spin liquids

    X.-G. Wen, “Quantum orders and symmetric spin liquids”, Phys. Rev. B 65 (2002), p. 165113, https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.65.165113

    2002 doi

  25. [33]

    Wen, Quantum field theory of many-body systems : , south asia ed

    X.-G. Wen, Quantum field theory of many-body systems : , south asia ed. ed., Oxford University Press, New Delhi, 2004, Includes bibliographical references and index

    2004

  26. [34]

    Fractionalization, Topological Order, and Quasiparticle Statistics

    M. Oshikawa, T . Senthil, “Fractionalization, Topological Order, and Quasiparticle Statistics”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006), p. 060601, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.060601

    2006 doi

  27. [35]

    Equivalence of the resonating-valence-bond and fractional quantum Hall states

    V . Kalmeyer, R. B. Laughlin, “Equivalence of the resonating-valence-bond and fractional quantum Hall states”,Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 (1987), p. 2095, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.2095

    1987 doi

  28. [36]

    Undecidability of the spectral gap

    T . S. Cubitt, D. Perez-Garcia, M. M. Wolf, “Undecidability of the spectral gap”, Nature 528 (2015), no. 7581, p. 207- 211, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature16059

    2015 doi

  29. [37]

    Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain

    E. Lieb, T . Schultz, D. Mattis, “Two soluble models of an antiferromagnetic chain”,Annals of Physics 16 (1961), no. 3, p. 407-466, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0003491661901154. Sylvain Capponi 19

    1961

  30. [38]

    Commensurability, Excitation Gap, and Topology in Quantum Many-Particle Systems on a Periodic Lattice

    M. Oshikawa, “Commensurability, Excitation Gap, and Topology in Quantum Many-Particle Systems on a Periodic Lattice”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000), p. 1535, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.84.1535

    2000 doi

  31. [39]

    Lieb-Schultz-Mattis in higher dimensions

    M. B. Hastings, “Lieb-Schultz-Mattis in higher dimensions”, Physical Review B 69 (2004), no. 10, p. 104431, http: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.69.104431 (accessed 6 August 2014)

    2004 doi

  32. [40]

    Crystallography, Group Cohomology, and Lieb-Schultz-Mattis Constraints

    C. Liu, W . Ye, “Crystallography, Group Cohomology, and Lieb-Schultz-Mattis Constraints”, 2024, https://arxiv.org/ abs/2410.03607, https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.03607

    2024 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Topological order and absence of band insulators at integer filling in non-symmorphic crystals

    S. A. Parameswaran, A. M. Turner, D. P . Arovas, A. Vishwanath, “Topological order and absence of band insulators at integer filling in non-symmorphic crystals”, Nature Physics 9 (2013), no. 5, p. 299-303, https://doi.org/10.1038/ nphys2600

    2013

  34. [42]

    Lattice Homotopy Constraints on Phases of Quantum Magnets

    H. C. Po, H. Watanabe, C.-M. Jian, M. P . Zaletel, “Lattice Homotopy Constraints on Phases of Quantum Magnets”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (2017), p. 127202, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.127202

    2017 doi

  35. [43]

    Topological characterization of Lieb-Schultz-Mattis constraints and applications to symmetry-enriched quantum criticality

    W . Ye, M. Guo, Y.-C. He, C. Wang, L. Zou, “Topological characterization of Lieb-Schultz-Mattis constraints and applications to symmetry-enriched quantum criticality”, SciPost Phys. 13 (2022), p. 066, https://scipost.org/10. 21468/SciPostPhys.13.3.066

    2022

  36. [44]

    Wannier Permanent Wave Functions for Featureless Bosonic Mott Insulators on the 1/3-Filled Kagome Lattice

    S. A. Parameswaran, I. Kimchi, A. M. Turner, D. M. Stamper-Kurn, A. Vishwanath, “Wannier Permanent Wave Functions for Featureless Bosonic Mott Insulators on the 1/3-Filled Kagome Lattice”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (2013), p. 125301, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.125301

    2013 doi

  37. [45]

    Featureless and nonfractionalized Mott insulators on the honeycomb lattice at 1/2 site filling

    I. Kimchi, S. A. Parameswaran, A. M. Turner, F . Wang, A. Vishwanath, “Featureless and nonfractionalized Mott insulators on the honeycomb lattice at 1/2 site filling”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 110 (2013), no. 41, p. 16378-16383, https://www.pnas.org/doi/...

    2013 doi

  38. [46]

    Featureless quantum insulator on the honeycomb lattice

    P . Kim, H. Lee, S. Jiang, B. Ware, C.-M. Jian, M. Zaletel, J. H. Han, Y. Ran, “Featureless quantum insulator on the honeycomb lattice”, Phys. Rev. B 94 (2016), p. 064432, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.94.064432

    2016 doi

  39. [47]

    Doping a Mott insulator: Physics of high-temperature superconductivity

    P . A. Lee, N. Nagaosa, X.-G. Wen, “Doping a Mott insulator: Physics of high-temperature superconductivity”, Rev. Mod. Phys. 78 (2006), p. 17-85, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.78.17

    2006 doi

  40. [48]

    Effect of Correlation on the Ferromagnetism of Transition Metals

    M. C. Gutzwiller, “Effect of Correlation on the Ferromagnetism of Transition Metals”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 10 (1963), p. 159-162, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.10.159

    1963 doi

  41. [49]

    Time reversal symmetry breaking chiral spin liquids: Projective symmetry group approach of bosonic mean-field theories

    L. Messio, C. Lhuillier, G. Misguich, “Time reversal symmetry breaking chiral spin liquids: Projective symmetry group approach of bosonic mean-field theories”,Phys. Rev. B87 (2013), p. 125127, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevB.87.125127

    2013

  42. [50]

    Projective symmetry group classification of chiral spin liquids

    S. Bieri, C. Lhuillier, L. Messio, “Projective symmetry group classification of chiral spin liquids”, Phys. Rev. B 93 (2016), p. 094437, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.094437

    2016 doi

  43. [51]

    Quark confinement and topology of gauge theories

    A. Polyakov, “Quark confinement and topology of gauge theories”, Nuclear Physics B 120 (1977), no. 3, p. 429-458, https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0550321377900864

    1977

  44. [52]

    Stability of U (1) spin liquids in two dimensions

    M. Hermele, T . Senthil, M. P . A. Fisher, P . A. Lee, N. Nagaosa, X.-G. Wen, “Stability of U (1) spin liquids in two dimensions”, Phys. Rev. B 70 (2004), p. 214437, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.70.214437

    2004 doi

  45. [53]

    Symmetry fractionalization, defects, and gauging of topological phases

    M. Barkeshli, P . Bonderson, M. Cheng, Z. Wang, “Symmetry fractionalization, defects, and gauging of topological phases”, Phys. Rev. B 100 (2019), p. 115147, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.100.115147

    2019 doi

  46. [54]

    Classifying fractionalization: Symmetry classification of gapped Z2 spin liquids in two dimensions

    A. M. Essin, M. Hermele, “Classifying fractionalization: Symmetry classification of gapped Z2 spin liquids in two dimensions”, Phys. Rev. B 87 (2013), p. 104406, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.104406

    2013 doi

  47. [55]

    Quantum spin liquids on the diamond lattice

    A. Chauhan, A. Maity, C. Liu, J. Sonnenschein, F . Ferrari, Y. Iqbal, “Quantum spin liquids on the diamond lattice”, Phys. Rev. B 108 (2023), p. 134424, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.108.134424

    2023 doi

  48. [56]

    F . D. M. Haldane,Phys.Rev.Lett. 60 (1988), p. 635

    1988

  49. [57]

    Rigorous results on valence-bond ground states in antiferromagnets

    I. Affleck, T . Kennedy, E. H. Lieb, H. Tasaki, “Rigorous results on valence-bond ground states in antiferromagnets”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59 (1987), no. 7, p. 799-802, http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.59.799

    1987 doi

  50. [58]

    Symmetry protection of topological phases in one-dimensional quantum spin systems

    F . Pollmann, E. Berg, A. M. Turner, M. Oshikawa, “Symmetry protection of topological phases in one-dimensional quantum spin systems”, Phys. Rev. B 85 (2012), p. 075125, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.85.075125

    2012 doi

  51. [59]

    Existence of a Spectral Gap in the Affleck-Kennedy-Lieb-Tasaki Model on the Hexagonal Lattice

    M. Lemm, A. W . Sandvik, L. Wang, “Existence of a Spectral Gap in the Affleck-Kennedy-Lieb-Tasaki Model on the Hexagonal Lattice”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (2020), p. 177204, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.124. 177204

    2020 doi

  52. [60]

    Two-dimensional symmetry-protected topological orders and their protected gapless edge excitations

    X. Chen, Z.-X. Liu, X.-G. Wen, “Two-dimensional symmetry-protected topological orders and their protected gapless edge excitations”, Phys. Rev. B 84 (2011), p. 235141, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.235141

    2011 doi

  53. [61]

    On Next-Nearest-Neighbor Interaction in Linear Chain. I

    C. K. Majumdar, D. K. Ghosh, “On Next-Nearest-Neighbor Interaction in Linear Chain. I”, Journal of Mathematical Physics 10 (1969), no. 8, p. 1388-1398, https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1664978, https://arxiv.org/abs/https://pubs.aip. org/aip/jmp/article-pdf/10/8/1388/19219090/1388_1_...

    1969 doi

  54. [62]

    An investigation of the quantumJ1-J2-J3 model on the honeycomb lattice

    J. B. Fouet, P . Sindzingre, C. Lhuillier, “ An investigation of the quantumJ1-J2-J3 model on the honeycomb lattice”, European Physical Journal B 20 (2001), p. 241-254, https://doi.org/10.1007/s100510170273

    2001 doi

  55. [63]

    Planar pyrochlore: A valence-bond crystal

    J.-B. Fouet, M. Mambrini, P . Sindzingre, C. Lhuillier, “Planar pyrochlore: A valence-bond crystal”, Phys. Rev. B 67 (2003), p. 054411, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.67.054411. 20 Sylvain Capponi

    2003 doi

  56. [64]

    Macroscopic Magnetization Jumps due to Independent Magnons in Frustrated Quantum Spin Lattices

    J. Schulenburg, A. Honecker, J. Schnack, J. Richter, H.-J. Schmidt, “Macroscopic Magnetization Jumps due to Independent Magnons in Frustrated Quantum Spin Lattices”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 88 (2002), p. 167207, https://link.aps. org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.167207

    2002 doi

  57. [65]

    Numerical study of magnetization plateaus in the spin- 1 2 kagome Heisenberg antiferromagnet

    S. Capponi, O. Derzhko, A. Honecker, A. M. Läuchli, J. Richter, “Numerical study of magnetization plateaus in the spin- 1 2 kagome Heisenberg antiferromagnet”, Phys. Rev. B 88 (2013), p. 144416, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevB.88.144416

    2013

  58. [66]

    Mean-field theory of spin-liquid states with finite energy gap and topological orders

    X. G. Wen, “Mean-field theory of spin-liquid states with finite energy gap and topological orders”, Phys. Rev. B 44 (1991), p. 2664-2672, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.44.2664

    1991 doi

  59. [67]

    Detecting Topological Order in a Ground State Wave Function

    M. Levin, X.-G. Wen, “Detecting Topological Order in a Ground State Wave Function”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006), p. 110405, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.110405

    2006 doi

  60. [68]

    Topological Entanglement Entropy

    A. Kitaev, J. Preskill, “Topological Entanglement Entropy”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 96 (2006), p. 110404, https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.110404

    2006 doi

  61. [69]

    Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons

    A. Kitaev, “Fault-tolerant quantum computation by anyons”, Annals of Physics 303 (2003), no. 1, p. 2-30, https: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003491602000180

    2003

  62. [70]

    Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond

    A. Kitaev, “ Anyons in an exactly solved model and beyond”, Annals of Physics 321 (2006), no. 1, p. 2-111, http: //www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/B6WB1-4J1NVDF-1/2/af3a0e5705ef4618583c17037d438853

    2006

  63. [71]

    String-net condensation: A physical mechanism for topological phases

    M. A. Levin, X.-G. Wen, “String-net condensation: A physical mechanism for topological phases”, Phys. Rev. B 71 (2005), p. 045110, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.71.045110

    2005 doi

  64. [72]

    Superconductivity and the Quantum Hard-Core Dimer Gas

    D. S. Rokhsar, S. A. Kivelson, “Superconductivity and the Quantum Hard-Core Dimer Gas”,Phys. Rev. Lett.61 (1988), p. 2376-2379, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.61.2376

    1988 doi

  65. [73]

    Resonating Valence Bond Phase in the Triangular Lattice Quantum Dimer Model

    R. Moessner, S. L. Sondhi, “Resonating Valence Bond Phase in the Triangular Lattice Quantum Dimer Model”,Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001), p. 1881-1884, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.1881

    2001 doi

  66. [74]

    Fractionalization in an easy-axis Kagome antiferromagnet

    L. Balents, M. P . A. Fisher, S. M. Girvin, “Fractionalization in an easy-axis Kagome antiferromagnet”,Phys. Rev. B 65 (2002), p. 224412, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.65.224412

    2002 doi

  67. [75]

    Numerical Evidences of Fractionalization in an Easy-Axis Two-Spin Heisenberg Antiferro- magnet

    D. N. Sheng, L. Balents, “Numerical Evidences of Fractionalization in an Easy-Axis Two-Spin Heisenberg Antiferro- magnet”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 94 (2005), p. 146805, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.146805

    2005 doi

  68. [76]

    Kagome model for aZ2 quantum spin liquid

    M. S. Block, J. D’Emidio, R. K. Kaul, “Kagome model for aZ2 quantum spin liquid”,Phys. Rev. B101 (2020), p. 020402, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.020402

    2020 doi

  69. [77]

    SU(2)-invariant spin- 1 2 Hamiltonians with resonating and other valence bond phases

    K. S. Raman, R. Moessner, S. L. Sondhi, “SU(2)-invariant spin- 1 2 Hamiltonians with resonating and other valence bond phases”, Phys. Rev. B 72 (2005), p. 064413, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.72.064413

    2005 doi

  70. [78]

    Spin Hamiltonians with Resonating-Valence-Bond Ground States

    J. Cano, P . Fendley, “Spin Hamiltonians with Resonating-Valence-Bond Ground States”,Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (2010), p. 067205, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.067205

    2010 doi

  71. [79]

    Engineering SU(2) invariant spin models to mimic quantum dimer physics on the square lattice

    M. Mambrini, S. Capponi, F . Alet, “Engineering SU(2) invariant spin models to mimic quantum dimer physics on the square lattice”, Phys. Rev. B 92 (2015), p. 134413, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.92.134413

    2015 doi

  72. [80]

    Chiral spin liquid and emergent anyons in a Kagome lattice Mott insulator

    B. Bauer, L. Cincio, B. Keller, M. Dolfi, G. Vidal, S. Trebst, A. Ludwig, “Chiral spin liquid and emergent anyons in a Kagome lattice Mott insulator”, Nature Communications 5 (2014), no. 1, p. 5137, https://doi.org/10.1038/ ncomms6137

    2014

  73. [81]

    Emergent Chiral Spin Liquid: Fractional Quantum Hall Effect in a Kagome Heisenberg Model

    S.-S. Gong, W . Zhu, D. N. Sheng, “Emergent Chiral Spin Liquid: Fractional Quantum Hall Effect in a Kagome Heisenberg Model”, Scientific Reports 4 (2014), no. 1, p. 6317, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep06317

    2014 doi

  74. [82]

    Chiral Spin Liquid in a Frustrated Anisotropic Kagome Heisenberg Model

    Y.-C. He, D. N. Sheng, Y. Chen, “Chiral Spin Liquid in a Frustrated Anisotropic Kagome Heisenberg Model”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 112 (2014), p. 137202, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.137202

    2014 doi

  75. [83]

    Global phase diagram of competing ordered and quantum spin-liquid phases on the kagome lattice

    S.-S. Gong, W . Zhu, L. Balents, D. N. Sheng, “Global phase diagram of competing ordered and quantum spin-liquid phases on the kagome lattice”, Phys. Rev. B 91 (2015), p. 075112, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.91. 075112

    2015 doi

  76. [84]

    Chiral spin liquid and quantum criticality in extended S = 1 2 Heisenberg models on the triangular lattice

    A. Wietek, A. M. Läuchli, “Chiral spin liquid and quantum criticality in extended S = 1 2 Heisenberg models on the triangular lattice”, Phys. Rev. B 95 (2017), p. 035141, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.035141

    2017 doi

  77. [85]

    Chiral Spin Liquid Phase of the Triangular Lattice Hubbard Model: A Density Matrix Renormalization Group Study

    A. Szasz, J. Motruk, M. P . Zaletel, J. E. Moore, “Chiral Spin Liquid Phase of the Triangular Lattice Hubbard Model: A Density Matrix Renormalization Group Study”, Phys. Rev. X 10 (2020), p. 021042, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevX.10.021042

    2020

  78. [86]

    Spin Hamiltonian for which the Chiral Spin Liquid is the Exact Ground State

    D. F . Schroeter, E. Kapit, R. Thomale, M. Greiter, “Spin Hamiltonian for which the Chiral Spin Liquid is the Exact Ground State”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007), p. 097202, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.097202

    2007 doi

  79. [87]

    Local models of fractional quantum Hall states in lattices and physical implementation

    A. E. B. Nielsen, G. Sierra, J. I. Cirac, “Local models of fractional quantum Hall states in lattices and physical implementation”, Nature Communications 4 (2013), no. 1, p. 2864, https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3864

    2013 doi

  80. [88]

    Non-Abelian chiral spin liquid in a quantum antiferromag- net revealed by an iPEPS study

    J.-Y. Chen, L. Vanderstraeten, S. Capponi, D. Poilblanc, “Non-Abelian chiral spin liquid in a quantum antiferromag- net revealed by an iPEPS study”, Phys. Rev. B 98 (2018), p. 184409, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.98. 184409

    2018 doi

  81. [89]

    Non-Abelian S = 1 chiral spin liquid on the kagome lattice

    Z.-X. Liu, H.-H. Tu, Y.-H. Wu, R.-Q. He, X.-J. Liu, Y. Zhou, T .-K. Ng, “Non-Abelian S = 1 chiral spin liquid on the kagome lattice”, Phys. Rev. B 97 (2018), p. 195158, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.97.195158

    2018 doi

  82. [90]

    Global quantum phase diagram and non-Abelian chiral spin liquid Sylvain Capponi 21 in a spin- 3 2 square-lattice antiferromagnet

    W .-W . Luo, Y. Huang, D. N. Sheng, W . Zhu, “Global quantum phase diagram and non-Abelian chiral spin liquid Sylvain Capponi 21 in a spin- 3 2 square-lattice antiferromagnet”, Phys. Rev. B 108 (2023), p. 035130, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevB.108.035130

    2023

  83. [91]

    Abelian SU(N )1 chiral spin liquids on the square lattice

    J.-Y. Chen, J.-W . Li, P . Nataf, S. Capponi, M. Mambrini, K. Totsuka, H.-H. Tu, A. Weichselbaum, J. von Delft, D. Poilblanc, “ Abelian SU(N )1 chiral spin liquids on the square lattice”, Phys. Rev. B 104 (2021), p. 235104, https: //link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.104.235104

    2021 doi

  84. [92]

    Robust non-Abelian spin liquid and a possible intermediate phase in the antiferromagnetic Kitaev model with magnetic field

    Z. Zhu, I. Kimchi, D. N. Sheng, L. Fu, “Robust non-Abelian spin liquid and a possible intermediate phase in the antiferromagnetic Kitaev model with magnetic field”, Phys. Rev. B97 (2018), p. 241110, https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevB.97.241110

    2018

  85. [93]

    Exact Chiral Spin Liquid with Non-Abelian Anyons

    H. Yao, S. A. Kivelson, “Exact Chiral Spin Liquid with Non-Abelian Anyons”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99 (2007), p. 247203, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.247203

    2007 doi

  86. [94]

    Spin liquid nature in the Heisenberg J1 − J2 triangular antiferromagnet

    Y. Iqbal, W .-J. Hu, R. Thomale, D. Poilblanc, F . Becca, “Spin liquid nature in the Heisenberg J1 − J2 triangular antiferromagnet”, Phys. Rev. B 93 (2016), p. 144411, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.144411

    2016 doi

  87. [95]

    Dirac Spin Liquid on the Spin-1/2 Triangular Heisenberg Antiferromagnet

    S. Hu, W . Zhu, S. Eggert, Y.-C. He, “Dirac Spin Liquid on the Spin-1/2 Triangular Heisenberg Antiferromagnet”,Phys. Rev. Lett. 123 (2019), p. 207203, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.123.207203

    2019 doi

  88. [96]

    From Spinon Band Topology to the Symmetry Quantum Numbers of Monopoles in Dirac Spin Liquids

    X.-Y. Song, Y.-C. He, A. Vishwanath, C. Wang, “From Spinon Band Topology to the Symmetry Quantum Numbers of Monopoles in Dirac Spin Liquids”,Phys. Rev. X 10 (2020), p. 011033, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.10. 011033

    2020 doi

  89. [97]

    Quantum Electrodynamics in 2 + 1 Dimensions as the Organizing Principle of a Triangular Lattice Antiferromagnet

    A. Wietek, S. Capponi, A. M. Läuchli, “Quantum Electrodynamics in 2 + 1 Dimensions as the Organizing Principle of a Triangular Lattice Antiferromagnet”, Phys. Rev. X 14 (2024), p. 021010, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevX.14.021010

    2024

  90. [98]

    Quantum spin ice: a search for gapless quantum spin liquids in pyrochlore magnets

    M. J. P . Gingras, P . A. McClarty, “Quantum spin ice: a search for gapless quantum spin liquids in pyrochlore magnets”, Reports on Progress in Physics 77 (2014), no. 5, p. 056501, https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/77/5/056501

    2014 doi

  91. [99]

    Direct evidence for a gapless Z2 spin liquid by frustrating Néel antiferro- magnetism

    W .-J. Hu, F . Becca, A. Parola, S. Sorella, “Direct evidence for a gapless Z2 spin liquid by frustrating Néel antiferro- magnetism”, Phys. Rev. B 88 (2013), p. 060402, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.88.060402

    2013 doi

  92. [100]

    Quantum criticality and spin liquid phase in the Shastry-Sutherland model

    J. Yang, A. W . Sandvik, L. Wang, “Quantum criticality and spin liquid phase in the Shastry-Sutherland model”,Phys. Rev. B 105 (2022), p. L060409, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.105.L060409

    2022 doi

  93. [101]

    Transformer Wave Function for the Shastry-Sutherland Model: emergence of a Spin-Liquid Phase

    L. L. Viteritti, R. Rende, A. Parola, S. Goldt, F . Becca, “Transformer Wave Function for the Shastry-Sutherland Model: emergence of a Spin-Liquid Phase”, 2024, https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.16889, https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.16889

    2024 arXiv

  94. [102]

    Theory of a Competitive Spin Liquid State for Weak Mott Insulators on the Triangular Lattice

    R. V . Mishmash, J. R. Garrison, S. Bieri, C. Xu, “Theory of a Competitive Spin Liquid State for Weak Mott Insulators on the Triangular Lattice”,Phys. Rev. Lett. 111 (2013), p. 157203, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.111. 157203

    2013 doi

  95. [103]

    Exact solution of an S=1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnetic chain with long-ranged interactions

    B. S. Shastry, “Exact solution of an S=1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnetic chain with long-ranged interactions”,Phys. Rev. Lett. 60 (1988), p. 639-642, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.60.639

    1988 doi

  96. [104]

    Variational study of triangular lattice spin-1/2 model with ring exchanges and spin liquid state in κ−(ET)2Cu2(CN)3

    O. I. Motrunich, “Variational study of triangular lattice spin-1/2 model with ring exchanges and spin liquid state in κ−(ET)2Cu2(CN)3”, Phys. Rev. B 72 (2005), p. 045105, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.72.045105

    2005 doi

  97. [105]

    Critical correlations for short-range valence-bond wave functions on the square lattice

    A. F . Albuquerque, F . Alet, “Critical correlations for short-range valence-bond wave functions on the square lattice”, Phys. Rev. B 82 (2010), p. 180408, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.180408

    2010 doi

  98. [106]

    Properties of resonating-valence-bond spin liquids and critical dimer models

    Y. Tang, A. W . Sandvik, C. L. Henley, “Properties of resonating-valence-bond spin liquids and critical dimer models”, Phys. Rev. B 84 (2011), p. 174427, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.84.174427

    2011 doi

  99. [107]

    Pyrochlore photons: The U(1) spin liquid in a S = (1/2) three-dimensional frustrated magnet

    M. Hermele, M. P . A. Fisher, L. Balents, “Pyrochlore photons: The U(1) spin liquid in a S = (1/2) three-dimensional frustrated magnet”, Phys. Rev. B 69 (2004), no. 6, p. 064404-21, http://link.aps.org/abstract/PRB/v69/e064404

    2004

  100. [108]

    Exotic ZN symmetries, duality, and fractons in 3+1-dimensional quantum field theory

    N. Seiberg, S.-H. Shao, “Exotic ZN symmetries, duality, and fractons in 3+1-dimensional quantum field theory”, SciPost Phys. 10 (2021), p. 003, https://scipost.org/10.21468/SciPostPhys.10.1.003

    2021 doi

  101. [109]

    Fractionalized Z2 Classical Heisenberg Spin Liquids

    J. Rehn, A. Sen, R. Moessner, “Fractionalized Z2 Classical Heisenberg Spin Liquids”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118 (2017), p. 047201, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.047201

    2017 doi

  102. [110]

    Deconfined quantum critical points: a review

    T . Senthil, “Deconfined quantum critical points: a review”, in 50 Years of the Renormalization Group, Dedicated to the Memory of Michael E. Fisher, World Scientific, Singapore, 2024, https://doi.org/10.1142/9789811282386_0014

    2024 doi

  103. [111]

    SO(5) multicriticality in two-dimensional quantum magnets

    J. Takahashi, H. Shao, B. Zhao, W . Guo, A. W . Sandvik, “SO(5) multicriticality in two-dimensional quantum magnets”, 2024, https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.06607, https://arxiv.org/abs/2405.06607

    2024 arXiv

  104. [112]

    Stiefel Liquids: Possible Non-Lagrangian Quantum Criticality from Intertwined Orders

    L. Zou, Y.-C. He, C. Wang, “Stiefel Liquids: Possible Non-Lagrangian Quantum Criticality from Intertwined Orders”, Phys. Rev. X 11 (2021), p. 031043, https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevX.11.031043

    2021 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.