Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 74 references

Well-posedness and invariant measures for complex valued modified KdV equation

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Complex-valued mKdV admits an infinite family of invariant measures, at higher and higher regularity, even though its Gibbs measure does not exist.

desk verdict New unconditional uniqueness for complex mKdV and a detailed n=2 invariant measure, but the advertised general-n ladder is asserted on a sketch that needs real work. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.14920 v1 pith:LPG3UUBF submitted 2025-01-24 math.AP

Carlos E. Kenig , Andrea R. Nahmod , Nataša Pavlović , Gigliola Staffilani , Nicola Visciglia This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35Q5335A0135A0237K1037K05
keywords complex-valuedmKdVinvariantmeasuresweightedGaussianunconditionalwell-posednessSobolevspacesconservationlawspairingestimatesperiodictorus
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies the complex-valued periodic modified Korteweg–de Vries equation and proves two results. First, it establishes unconditional local well-posedness for strong solutions with initial data in H^s for s > 4/3, a threshold below the previously known s > 3/2. Second, and central, it constructs a sequence of weighted Gaussian measures rho_{n,R} supported on Sobolev spaces of increasing regularity, and proves that almost every initial datum yields a global flow whose Sobolev norm grows at most logarithmically in time. The invariance proof is written in full for n = 2, while for general n the paper gives a structural reduction and asserts that the same cancellation mechanism applies. If correct, this provides an infinite family of invariant measures for a Hamiltonian system whose Gibbs measure is not available, extending Zhidkov's program to the complex setting.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is a two-layer approximation: the finite-dimensional truncated flow Phi_N(t) is Liouville and preserves the Gaussian part of the measure rho_{n,R,N}, while the density factor built from lower conservation laws is almost invariant because the time derivative of E_{2n+1} along Phi_N(t) is shown to vanish in L2(mu) as N tends to infinity. The vanishing is proved with two tools: Kato–Ponce type commutator estimates for the deterministic energy bounds, and a pairing combinatorics (Definition 3.5, Proposition 3.6) that controls the second moment of multilinear Gaussian sums. The critical cancellation for n = 2 is the identity that the imaginary part of the six-frequency sum in (4.15) is zero on certain pairing sets (Lemma 4.5), which removes the would-be divergences.

What would settle it

For a fixed n > 2, for example n = 3, compute the L2(omega) norm of the finite sum in (6.9) for increasing values of the truncation N and check whether it decays at least at a power rate in N; failure to decay would show that the cancellation structure does not survive to higher conservation laws. A complementary check is to verify whether the analogue of Lemma 4.5, the symmetry identity that zeroes the problematic pairing sets, holds for the general exponent patterns of Section 6.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The main discovery is that, despite the complex-valued mKdV having no Gibbs measure (because the quadratic part of its Hamiltonian energy E4 is indefinite), there exist weighted Gaussian measures built from the higher conservation laws E_{2n+1} that are invariant under the flow. The key obstacle in the complex case is a term that vanishes identically for real-valued solutions by integration by parts; the paper shows that in the complex case this term converges to zero in L2(mu_2) via a Fourier-side imaginary-part cancellation, proved by decomposing the frequency set according to pairings and exploiting symmetries. The full result for every n >= 2 is stated as Theorem 1.5, with Section 6 arguing that the dangerous high-order term (6.9) has the same symmetric structure as the n = 2 case.

Load-bearing premise

The proof that the sequence of invariant measures exists for every n >= 2 depends on the assertion in Section 6 that the general high-order term (6.9) 'has the same symmetric structure as (4.15) and hence can be treated in the same way mutatis mutandis'; no lemmas or convergence rates are proved for n > 2, and Proposition 4.1 is demonstrated only for n = 2.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The flow of complex mKdV is almost surely global for initial data in H^s with s > 4/3, whereas the deterministic global theory in the paper is proved only for s >= 2.
  • Almost surely, the H^s norm of the solution grows at most logarithmically in time, improving the exponential growth bound that follows from iterating the local Cauchy theory.
  • For every integer n >= 2 there is a weighted Gaussian measure rho_{n,R} invariant under the flow, giving an infinite sequence of invariant measures at increasing regularity.
  • The construction opens the way to Poincaré recurrence and statistical-mechanics interpretations for complex mKdV, paralleling the Gibbs-measure theory for real-valued equations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the Section 6 sketch can be completed for general n, the method shows that the absence of a Gibbs measure is not an obstruction to constructing invariant measures from higher conservation laws, suggesting the technique may transfer to other integrable hierarchies with indefinite quadratic energies.
  • The proof of the invariance of the set Sigma_R uses a constant D that must be uniform in s in [4/3, bar s]; verifying that the Gaussian bounds are indeed uniform is a checkable step that the paper asserts but does not fully spell out.
  • A natural testable extension is the focusing case, which the paper states follows with minor changes, but the sign of the nonlinearity could affect the delicate cancellation structure and would deserve a separate check.
  • The cancellation mechanism may be rephrased as a statement about random tensor decoupling, suggesting that the pairing estimates from the probabilistic toolbox might yield even sharper almost-sure bounds, such as sub-logarithmic growth, under additional assumptions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the periodic complex-valued modified KdV equation ∂_t u + ∂_x^3 u = 6|u|^2 ∂_x u. The deterministic result, Theorem 1.2, establishes unconditional local well-posedness of strong solutions in H^s for s > 4/3, together with uniform estimates for the frequency-truncated flows Φ_N; Corollary 1.3 globalizes the statement for s ≥ 2. The main probabilistic result, Theorem 1.5, asserts that for every integer n ≥ 2 and every s ∈ (4/3, (2n−1)/2) there is a Borel set of full µ_n-measure on which the flow is global, grows at most logarithmically in H^s, and leaves the weighted Gaussian measure ρ_{n,R} invariant. The construction is carried out in detail for n = 2 in Sections 4 and 5; Section 6 sketches the extension to general n by exploiting the structure of the higher conservation laws E_{2n+1} and reducing the problem to a single multilinear estimate, Eq. (6.9).

Significance. If fully established, the result would be a significant advance. It constructs invariant weighted Gaussian measures for complex-valued mKdV, a case not accessible to the straightforward Zhidkov argument because the quadratic part of the Hamiltonian is indefinite; it also provides a sequence of measures supported on increasingly regular Sobolev spaces. The deterministic part is essentially self-contained and includes unconditional uniqueness at H^s for s > 4/3, which appears to be below the previously known regularity threshold. The n = 2 proof demonstrates a genuine cancellation mechanism specific to complex-valued data, and no parameters are fitted; the main probabilistic input is cited from published work. At present, however, the full statement of Theorem 1.5 for every n ≥ 2 rests on a sketched extension that is not proved, so the verified core of the paper is the deterministic theorem together with the n = 2 measure construction.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 6; Eq. (6.9)] Theorem 1.5 is stated for every n ≥ 2, but the proof of Proposition 4.1, which is the almost-invariance statement needed in Section 5, is given in detail only for n = 2. Section 6 reduces the general case to the assertion that (6.9) 'has the same symmetric structure as (4.15) and hence can be treated in the same way mutatis mutandis'. No general-n analogues of Lemmas 4.5–4.12 are provided, and the cancellation for the 1-pairing cases j2 = j6 and j3 = j6, which is delicate already for n = 2, is not verified for the exponents n−1. Since the existence of the infinite sequence of invariant measures is the headline claim, this is a load-bearing gap. Please provide a complete proof for all n, or reformulate Theorem 1.5 as a statement for n = 2.
  2. [Section 6; Eq. (6.9)] There is a consistency error in the displayed estimate (6.9). The Gaussian vector (1.9) has Fourier coefficients with denominator sqrt(1 + |j|^{2n}) = ⟨j^n⟩, so substitution of (1.9) into (6.6) gives denominator product ∏_{i=1}^6 ⟨j_i^n⟩, not ∏_{i=1}^6 ⟨j_i^{2n}⟩. If the displayed exponent is kept, one is estimating a different and easier Gaussian model; if the denominator is corrected, the summability and cancellation arguments of Section 4 must be redone for general n. This needs to be fixed and explained.
  3. [Section 5.2] The invariance of the measure on the invariant set Σ is justified only by the sentence 'the invariance of the measure on Σ follows by exactly the same computations done for the Benjamin-Ono equation in [68]'. Since the truncated measures are not exactly invariant and one must pass through the almost-invariance of Proposition 4.1, the approximation argument should be written out, including the convergence of the densities and the handling of sets that depend on the truncation parameter.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 4.1, after Eq. (4.14)] The estimate (4.14) is asserted to follow 'similarly' and is not proved. Since it is one of the three reductions in the proof of Proposition 4.3, please provide at least a concise completion of the argument.
  2. [Section 1.3] In the paragraph after Corollary 1.3, the text refers to 'Corollary 1.2' when describing deterministic global well-posedness; the intended reference appears to be Corollary 1.3.
  3. [Section 3, Proposition 3.4] The notation ρ_{n,j} is used for the radius parameter, whereas the measures were defined as ρ_{n,R}; please align the notation.
  4. [Section 5.1, Eq. (5.10)] The almost-invariance estimate is invoked on the interval [−2^j, 2^j], while Proposition 4.1 is stated for t ∈ [0, T]; the extension to negative times should be stated explicitly.
  5. [References] References [34] and [36] appear to be the same arXiv preprint and should be merged or one removed.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 1.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the general-n extension is an unproved 'mutatis mutandis' step, but this is a completeness gap, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The invariant measures are constructed from the Gaussian measures mu_n and the densities F_{n,R} built from the conservation laws; no parameter is fitted to data, and the invariance of rho_{n,R} is established for n=2 in detail by proving almost-invariance along Phi_N via Propositions 4.2 and 4.3, using the pairing estimate Proposition 3.6. That estimate is cited from the published works [22,23] by Deng, Nahmod and Yue; although one author (Nahmod) is common to this paper, the cited results are general multilinear Gaussian large-deviation bounds, not the target mKdV invariant-measure theorem, so the citation is genuine evidence rather than a circular load. Similar remarks apply to the Kato-Ponce estimates [35] (where Kenig is a co-author) and to the Benjamin-Ono invariance computations [68] invoked in Section 5; these are separately published results for other equations. The paper explicitly states that Proposition 4.1 is proved in detail only for n=2 and that Section 6 only sketches the general case; the assertion that (6.9) 'has the same symmetric structure as (4.15)' is an unproved generalization, and the denominator <j_i^{2n}> in (6.9) appears inconsistent with the Gaussian weight <j_i^n> arising from (1.9). These are gaps or typographical inconsistencies that affect correctness risk for the full sequence n>2, but they are not reductions of the conclusion to the hypotheses: no equation in the paper defines the target invariant measure in terms of itself, and no fitted quantity is relabelled as a prediction. Therefore the circularity score is low.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new physical entities or fitted numerical parameters. It relies on established conservation laws, Gaussian measures, and published analytic estimates. All constants in the proofs are universal and not tuned against external data.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Bourgain L^6 Strichartz estimate for the KdV propagator on the torus (2.8), cited from [9].
    Used in Lemma 2.4 to bound the time integral of the W^{1,infty} norm; foundational for the local well-posedness and uniform N estimates.
  • domain assumption The conservation laws E_n, defined recursively via (1.2), are genuine conserved quantities for the complex mKdV flow.
    The paper uses E_5 and E_{2n+1} as conserved quantities, and the recursive definition is standard for the NLS hierarchy but is taken as background.
  • standard math The pairing large deviation bound Proposition 3.6 from [22,23].
    Central to estimating the almost-invariance terms in Proposition 4.3.
  • standard math Gaussian measure tail bounds and support properties on Sobolev spaces, proved sketchily in Section 3.
    Standard Gaussian measure facts on Hilbert spaces used in the probabilistic construction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Well-posedness and invariant measures for complex valued modified KdV equation." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LPG3UUBF

@misc{pith2026250114920,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Well-posedness and invariant measures for complex valued modified KdV equation},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LPG3UUBF}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.14920}
}
read the original abstract

We consider the one dimensional periodic complex valued mKdV, which corresponds to the first equation above cubic NLS in the associated integrable hierarchy. Our main result is the construction of a sequence of invariant measures supported on Sobolev spaces with increasing regularity. The fact that we work with complex valued functions makes the analysis of the invariance much harder compared to the real valued case, that can be handled instead following the ideas used by Zhidkov [73].

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

74 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [68]

    Tzvetkov, N

    N. Tzvetkov, N. Visciglia, Invariant measures and long -time behavior for the Benjamin-Ono equation, Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN , 2014, no. 17, 4679–4714

    work page 2014

  2. [1]

    Well-posedness for the NLS hierarchy

    Adams, Wellposedness for the NLS hierarchy. Preprint, a rXiv:2402.07652

    work page Pith review arXiv

  3. [2]

    Nonlinear interpolation and the flow map for quasilinear equations

    T. Alazard, N. Burq, M. Ifrim, D.Tataru and C. Zuily, Nonl inear interpolation and the flow map for quasilinear equations. Preprint, arXiv:2410.06909

    work page Pith review arXiv

  4. [3]

    Beals and R

    R. Beals and R. R. Coifman, Scattering and inverse scatte ring for first order systems, Communications on Pure and Applied Mathematics, 37 (1984), 39-90

    work page 1984

  5. [4]

    Beals and R

    R. Beals and R. R. Coifman, Inverse scattering and evolut ion equations, Communications on pure and applied math- ematics, 38 (1985), 29-42

    work page 1985

  6. [5]

    Beals and R

    R. Beals and R. R. Coifman, Scattering and inverse scatte ring for first-order systems. II, Inverse Problems, 3 (1987), 577-593

    work page 1987

  7. [6]

    Birnir, G

    B. Birnir, G. Ponce and N. Svanstedt, The local ill-posed ness of the modified KdV equation, Ann. Inst. H. Poincaré Anal. Non Lináire 13 (4) (1996), 529–535

    work page 1996

  8. [7]

    Bogachev, Gaussian Measures, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs , AMS, 2015

    V. Bogachev, Gaussian Measures, Mathematical Surveys and Monographs , AMS, 2015

    work page 2015

Show all 74 references
  1. [8]

    Bona and R

    J. Bona and R. Smith, The initial-value problem for the Ko rteweg-de Vries equation, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series A, Mathematical and Phys ical Sciences, 278, (1975), 555–601

    1975

  2. [9]

    Bourgain, Fourier transform restriction phenomena f or certain lattice subsets and applications to nonlinear ev olution equations II

    J. Bourgain, Fourier transform restriction phenomena f or certain lattice subsets and applications to nonlinear ev olution equations II. The KdV equation, Geom. Funct. Anal. 3 (3) (1993), 209–262

    1993

  3. [10]

    Bourgain, Periodic nonlinear Schrödinger equation and invariant measures, Comm

    J. Bourgain, Periodic nonlinear Schrödinger equation and invariant measures, Comm. Math. Phys. 166(1), 1–26 (1994)

    1994

  4. [11]

    Bourgain, Invariant measures for the 2D-defocusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Commun.Math

    J. Bourgain, Invariant measures for the 2D-defocusing nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Commun.Math. Phys. 176, 421–445 (1996)

    1996

  5. [12]

    Burq, L.Thomann and N

    N. Burq, L.Thomann and N. Tzvetkov, Long time dynamics f or the one dimensional NLS, Annales de l’Institut Fourier, Volume 63 (2013) no. 6, pp. 2137–2198

    2013

  6. [13]

    Chapouto, A remark on the well-posedness of the modifi ed KDV equation in the Fourier-Lebesgue spaces, Discrete Contin

    A. Chapouto, A remark on the well-posedness of the modifi ed KDV equation in the Fourier-Lebesgue spaces, Discrete Contin. Dyn. Syst. 41(8) (2021), 3915-3950

    2021

  7. [14]

    Chapouto, A refined well-posedness result for the mod ified KdV equation in the Fourier-Lebesgue spaces, J

    A. Chapouto, A refined well-posedness result for the mod ified KdV equation in the Fourier-Lebesgue spaces, J. Dynam. Differential Equations 35 (2023), no. 3, 2537-2578

    2023

  8. [15]

    Chapouto and J

    A. Chapouto and J. Forlano, Invariant measures for peri odic KdV and mKdV equations using complete inetgrability. Preprint, arXiv:2305.14565

    arXiv

  9. [16]

    Chapouto, G

    A. Chapouto, G. Li, and T. Oh, Deep-water and Shallow-wa ter Limits of Statistical Equilibria for the Intermediate Long Wave Equation. Preprint, arXiv:2409.06905

    arXiv

  10. [17]

    Chen and B

    M. Chen and B. Guo, Local well and ill-posedness for the m odified KdV equations in subcritical modulation spaces, Commun. Math. Sci. 18 (4) (2020), 909–946

    2020

  11. [18]

    Christ, J

    M. Christ, J. Colliander and T. Tao, Asymptotics, frequ ency modulation, and low regularity ill-posedness for cano n- ical defocusing equations, Amer. J. Math. 125(6) (2003), 1235-1293

    2003

  12. [19]

    Colliander, M

    J. Colliander, M. Keel, G. Staffilani, H. Takaoka and T. Ta o, Sharp global well-posedness for KdV and modified KdV on R and T, J. Amer. Math. Soc. 16(3) (2003), 705-749

    2003

  13. [20]

    Colliander, M

    J. Colliander, M. Keel, G. Staffilani, H. Takaoka and T. Ta o, Multilinear estimates for periodic KdV equations, and applications, Journal of Functional Analysis , Volume 211 (2004), 173–218

    2004

  14. [21]

    Deift and X

    P. Deift and X. Zhou, Long-time asymptotics for solutio ns of the NLS equation with initial data in a weighted Sobolev space, Commun. Pure Appl. Math. 56 (2003), 1029–1077

    2003

  15. [22]

    Y. Deng, A. Nahmod and H. Yue, Invariant Gibbs measures a nd global strong solutions for nonlinear Schrödinger equations in dimension two, Annals of Math. Vol. 200, (2024), to appear

    2024

  16. [23]

    Y. Deng, A. Nahmod and H. Yue, Random tensors, propagati on of randomness and nonlinear dispersive equations, Inventiones Math , 2022, 539-686

    2022

  17. [24]

    Y. Deng, N. Tzvetkov and N. Visciglia, Invariant measur es and long time behavior for the Benjamin-Ono equation III. Comm. Math. Phys. 339 (2015), no. 3, 815–857

    2015

  18. [25]

    L. D. Faddeev and L. A. Takhtajan, Hamiltonian methods i n the theory of solitons, Classics in Mathematics, Springer , Berlin, english ed., 2007

    2007

  19. [26]

    Genovese, R

    G. Genovese, R. Lucá, D. Valeri, Invariant measures for the periodic derivative nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Math. Ann. 374 (2019), no. 3-4, 1075–1138

    2019

  20. [27]

    Genovese, R

    G. Genovese, R. Lucá, D. Valeri, Gibbs measures associa ted to the integrals of motion of the periodic derivative nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Selecta Math. (N.S.) 22 (2016), no. 3, 1663–1702

    2016

  21. [28]

    Gerard, T

    P. Gerard, T. Kappeler and P. Topalov, Sharp well-posed ness results of the Benjamin-Ono equation in H s(T, R) and qualitative properties of its solutions. Acta Math. 231 (2023), no. 1, 31–88. INV ARIANT MEASURES FOR COMPLEX V ALUED MKDV 43

    2023

  22. [29]

    Grébert and T

    B. Grébert and T. Kappeler, The defocusing NLS equation and its normal form, EMS, 2014

    2014

  23. [30]

    Grünrock, An improved local well-posedness result f or the modified KdV equation, Int

    A. Grünrock, An improved local well-posedness result f or the modified KdV equation, Int. Math. Res. Not. 2004 (61) (2004), 3287–3308

    2004

  24. [31]

    Grünrock and L

    A. Grünrock and L. Vega, Local well-posedness for the mo dified KdV equation in almost critical H s,r -spaces, Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 361 (11) (2009), 5681–5694

    2009

  25. [32]

    Guo, Global well-posedness of Korteweg-de Vries equ ation in H − 3 4 , J

    Z. Guo, Global well-posedness of Korteweg-de Vries equ ation in H − 3 4 , J. Math. Pures Appl. , (9) 91 (6) (2009), 583–597

    2009

  26. [33]

    Z. Guo, S. Kwon and T. Oh, Poincaré-Dulac normal form red uction for unconditional well-posedness of the periodic cubic NLS, Comm. Math. Phys. 322(1) (2013), 19-48

    2013

  27. [35]

    Ionescu and C

    A. Ionescu and C. Kenig. Local and Global Wellposedness of the Periodic KP-I Equations, Mathematical Aspects of Nonlinear Dispersive Equations , Annals of Math. Studies 163 (2007) 181-211

    2007

  28. [36]

    Haque, R

    S. Haque, R. Killip, M. Visan, Y. Zhang, Global well-pos edness and equicontinuity for mKdV in modulation spaces. Preprint, arXiv:2411.05300

    arXiv

  29. [37]

    Harrop-Griffiths, R

    B. Harrop-Griffiths, R. Killip and M. Visan Sharp well-po sedness for the cubic NLS and mKdV in H s(R), Forum of Mathematics, Pi (2024), Vol. 12:e6 1-86

    2024

  30. [38]

    Kappeler and J.-C

    T. Kappeler and J.-C. Molnar, On the well-posedness of t he defocusing mKdV equation below L2, Siam J. Math. Anal. 49 (3) (2017), 2191–2219

    2017

  31. [39]

    Kappeler, B

    T. Kappeler, B. Schaad, P. Topalov, Scattering-like ph enomena of the periodic defocusing NLS equation, Math. Res. Lett. 24 (2017), no. 3, 803–826

    2017

  32. [40]

    Kappeler and P

    T. Kappeler and P. Topalov, Global well-posedness of mK dV in L2(T,R), Commun. Partial Differ. Equ. 30 (1-3) (2005), 435–449

    2005

  33. [41]

    T. Kato, On the Cauchy problem for the (generalized) Kor teweg - de Vries equation, in Studies in Applied Mathe- matics, Advances in Mathematics Supplement Studies , volume 8 (Academic Press, New York, 1983), 93-128

    1983

  34. [42]

    Kato, On the Korteweg-De Vries equations, Manuscripta Math 28, 89–99, 1979

    T. Kato, On the Korteweg-De Vries equations, Manuscripta Math 28, 89–99, 1979

    1979

  35. [43]

    Kenig, On the local and global well-posedness theory for the KP-I equation

    C. Kenig, On the local and global well-posedness theory for the KP-I equation. Annales de lInst. Henri Poincaré 827-837, 2004

    2004

  36. [44]

    C. E. Kenig and D. Pilod, Local well-posedness for the Kd V hierarchy at high regularity, Adv. Differential Equations 21 (2016), no.9-10, 801-836

    2016

  37. [45]

    Kenig, G

    C. Kenig, G. Ponce and L. Vega, On the ill-posedness of so me canonical dispersive equations, Duke Math. J. 106 (2001), no. 3, 617–633

    2001

  38. [46]

    Kenig, G

    C. Kenig, G. Ponce and L. Vega, Well-posedness and scatt ering results for the generalized Korteweg-de Vries equati on via the contraction principle, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 46 (1993), no. 4, 527 –620

    1993

  39. [47]

    Kenig, G

    C. Kenig, G. Ponce and L. Vega The Cauchy problem for the K orteweg-de Vries equation in Sobolev spaces of negative indices, Duke Math. J. 71 (1993), no. 1, 1-21

    1993

  40. [48]

    Kenig and S

    C. Kenig and S. Ziesler, Local well-posedness for the mo dified Kadomtsev-Petviashvili equations, Differential and integral Equations, Vol. 18, No 10 1111-1146, 2005

    2005

  41. [49]

    Kishimoto, Well-posedness of the Cauchy problem for the KdV equation at the critical regularity, Differ

    N. Kishimoto, Well-posedness of the Cauchy problem for the KdV equation at the critical regularity, Differ. Integral Equ. 22 (5-6) (2009), 447–464

    2009

  42. [50]

    Killip, M

    R. Killip, M. Visan and X. Zhang, Low regularity conserv ation laws for integrable PDE, Geom. Funct. Anal. 28 (4) (2018), 1062–1090

    2018

  43. [51]

    Klaus, H

    F. Klaus, H. Koch, B. Liu, Well-posedness for the KdV hie rarchy. Preprint, arXiv:2309.12773

    arXiv

  44. [52]

    Koch and D

    H. Koch and D. Tataru, Conserved energies for the cubic n onlinear Schrödinger equation in one dimension, Duke Math. J. 167(17) (2018), 3207–3313

    2018

  45. [53]

    Koch and N

    H. Koch and N. Tzvetkov, On the local well-posedness of t he Benjamin-Ono equation in H s(R), IMRN 26, (2003), Pages 1449–1464

    2003

  46. [54]

    S. Kwon, T. Oh and H. Yoon, Normal form approach to uncond itional well-posedness of nonlinear dispersive PDEs on the real line, Ann. Fac. Sci. Toulouse Math. (6) 29(3) (2020), 649–720

    2020

  47. [55]

    Lebowitz, H

    J. Lebowitz, H. Rose and E. Speer, Statistical mechanic s of the nonlinear Schrödinger equation, J. Stat. Phys, 1988 , 657-687

    1988

  48. [56]

    Linares and G

    F. Linares and G. Ponce, Introduction to Nonlinear Disp ersive Equations, Springer, Universitext (UTX) , 2015

    2015

  49. [57]

    Molinet, Sharp ill-posedness results for the KdV and mKdV equations on the torus, Adv

    L. Molinet, Sharp ill-posedness results for the KdV and mKdV equations on the torus, Adv. Math. 230 (4–6) (2012), 1895–1930

    2012

  50. [58]

    Molinet, D

    L. Molinet, D. Pilod, S. Vento, On unconditional well-p osedness for the periodic modified Korteweg de Vries equatio n, J. Math. Soc. Japan 71 (2019), no. 1, 147–201

    2019

  51. [59]

    S. Kwon, T. Oh, On Unconditional Well-Posedness of Modi fied KdV, IMRN, Volume 2012, Issue 15, 2012, 3509–3534

    2012

  52. [60]

    Oh and Y

    T. Oh and Y. Wang, On global well-posedness of the modifie d KdV equation in modulation spaces, Discrete Cont. Dyn. Syst. 41 (6) (2021), 2971–2992. 44 KENIG, NAHMOD, PA VLOVIĆ, STAFFILANI, AND VISCIGLIA

    2021

  53. [61]

    Nahmod, T

    A. Nahmod, T. Oh, L. Rey-Bellet and G. Staffilani, Invaria nt weighted Wiener measures and almost sure global well-posedness for the periodic derivative NLS, JEMS, 14(4), 1275–1330 (2012)

    2012

  54. [62]

    Palais, The symmetries of solitons, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 34 (1997), 339-403

    R. Palais, The symmetries of solitons, Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society 34 (1997), 339-403

    1997

  55. [63]

    J. C. Saut and R. Temam, Remarks on the Korteweg-De Vries equation. Israel Journal of Mathematics Vol. 24, No. 1, 1976

    1976

  56. [64]

    Terng and K

    C.-L. Terng and K. Uhlenbeck, Poisson actions and scatt ering theory for integrable systems, Surveys in Differential Geometry, 4 (1998), 315-402

    1998

  57. [65]

    Tsutsumi, Weighted Sobolev spaces and rapidly decre asing solutions of some nonlinear dispersive wave equation s, J

    M. Tsutsumi, Weighted Sobolev spaces and rapidly decre asing solutions of some nonlinear dispersive wave equation s, J. Diff. Equ. 42 (2) (1981), 260–281

    1981

  58. [66]

    Tzvetkov, Invariant measures for the defocusing Non linear Schrödinger equation, Annales de l’Institut Fourier , Volume 58 (2008) no

    N. Tzvetkov, Invariant measures for the defocusing Non linear Schrödinger equation, Annales de l’Institut Fourier , Volume 58 (2008) no. 7, pp. 2543–2604

    2008

  59. [67]

    Tzvetkov, N

    N. Tzvetkov, N. Visciglia, Gaussian measures associat ed to the higher order conservation laws of the Benjamin-Ono equation, Ann. Sci. Éc. Norm. Supér. (4) 46 (2013), no. 2, 249–299

    2013

  60. [69]

    Tzvetkov, N

    N. Tzvetkov, N. Visciglia, Invariant measures and long time behavior for the Benjamin-Ono equation II, J. Math. Pures Appl. (9) 103 (2015), no. 1, 102–141

    2015

  61. [70]

    Tzvetkov and N

    N. Tzvetkov and N. Visciglia, Gaussian measures associ ated to the higher order conservation laws of the Benjamin- Ono equation, Ann. Scient. Éc. Norm. Sup. , 4 e série, t. 46, 2013, p. 249–299

    2013

  62. [71]

    V. E. Zakharov and A. B. Shabat, Exact theory of two-dime nsional self-focusing and one-dimensional selfmodulatio n of waves in nonlinear media, Éksper. Teoret. Fiz. 61 (1971), 118-134

    1971

  63. [72]

    Zhidkov, On an infinite sequence of invariant measu res for the cubic nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Int

    P.E. Zhidkov, On an infinite sequence of invariant measu res for the cubic nonlinear Schrödinger equation, Int. J. Math. Math. Sci. 28 (7) (2001), 375–394

    2001

  64. [73]

    Zhidkov, Korteweg-de Vries and Nonlinear Schrödi nger Equations: Qualitative Theory

    P.E. Zhidkov, Korteweg-de Vries and Nonlinear Schrödi nger Equations: Qualitative Theory. Lecture Notes in Math- ematics, (LNM, volume 1756)

  65. [74]

    Zhou, Direct and inverse scattering transforms with arbitrary spectral singularities, Comm

    X. Zhou, Direct and inverse scattering transforms with arbitrary spectral singularities, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 42 (1989), 895-938

    1989

  66. [75]

    Zhou, L2-Sobolev space bijectivity of the scatterin g and inverse scattering transforms, Comm

    X. Zhou, L2-Sobolev space bijectivity of the scatterin g and inverse scattering transforms, Comm. Pure Appl. Math. 51 (1998), 697-731. 1 Depar tment of Ma thema tics, University of Chicago, Eckhar tHall, 5734 S University A ve, Chicago, IL 60637 Email address : cek@uchicago.ed...

    1998

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.