Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 70 references

On-chip real-time detection of optical frequency variations with ultrahigh resolution using the sine-cosine encoder approach

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A 5.5-mm photonic chip detects laser frequency changes as small as 2 MHz in real time while tracking sweeps up to 2500 THz/s.

desk verdict A solid integrated-photonics demonstration of a sine-cosine optical frequency detector on TFLN, with a sensible calibration scheme and honest limitations, but the headline 2 MHz resolution is inferred from filtered traces rather than a formal noise characterization, and back-reflection artifacts could contaminate the demodulation. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.15353 v1 pith:35TLJ4VM submitted 2025-01-26 physics.optics

X. Steve Yao , Yulong Yang , Xiaosong Ma , Zhongjin Lin , Yuntao Zhu , Wei Ke , Heyun Tan , Xichen Wang
show 1 more author
Xinlun Cai
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords opticalfrequencyvariationsine-cosineencoderthin-filmlithiumniobatephotonicintegratedcircuitI-QinterferometerFBGinterrogationreal-timelasercharacterizationk-clockgeneration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper reports a chip-sized optical frequency detector that turns the sine-cosine encoder principle, familiar from motor position sensing, into an on-chip interferometric measurement of laser frequency variation. The central claim is that a 5.5 mm by 2.7 mm thin-film lithium niobate chip can detect frequency changes down to 2 MHz (0.016 pm) and follow frequency sweeps as fast as 2500 THz/s across a 160-nm wavelength range, with a demodulation algorithm that absorbs device imperfections through calibration. If true, this would replace bulky fiber interferometers, optical spectrum analyzers, and comb-based systems in applications needing real-time frequency tracking. The paper also demonstrates the chip as a fiber Bragg grating interrogator, resolving dynamic strain at 0.1 to 0.2 microstrain at 500 Hz, and argues that better electronics could push sensitivity well beyond current commercial interrogators.

What carries the argument

The central object is a photonic sine-cosine encoder built from two unbalanced I-Q interferometers, each made of a coupler and a 90-degree hybrid realized as a 2x4 multimode interference coupler. The upper interferometer provides fine frequency increments through a small free spectral range, while the lower interferometer provides the absolute wavelength reference through a very large free spectral range. The demodulation formula, Eq. (S9), computes the frequency increment from the four normalized photodetector voltages using calibrated bias, amplitude, modulation-depth, and phase-imperfection parameters, so that wavelength-dependent fabrication deviations are corrected rather than treated as ideal.

What would settle it

Measure a laser whose frequency is independently known to be stable to below 1 MHz over several seconds, using a dual-comb or cavity-stabilized reference, while feeding the chip the same light. If the chip reports periodic ripples at its own free spectral range, at the detector cavity round-trip frequency, or at the 50-Hz power-line harmonics that are absent in the reference, the single-sinusoid calibration model is incomplete and the claimed 2 MHz resolution would be an artifact of the model rather than a true optical frequency measurement.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The authors demonstrate that two unbalanced I-Q interferometers on a single TFLN chip, one with a 10-mm optical path difference (30 GHz free spectral range) for fine frequency increments and one with a 14.43-µm optical path difference (20.79 THz free spectral range) for absolute wavelength estimation, can measure optical frequency variations in real time. The key to the claimed performance is a calibration and demodulation procedure that models each photodetector output as a sinusoid with independent bias, amplitude, modulation depth, and quadrature phase imperfections, all wavelength dependent, and then uses an arctangent formula to recover the phase increment and hence the frequency variation. With this approach, the authors show that they can resolve 1-pm wavelength steps, reveal scanning ripples and overshoots in commercial tunable lasers, measure a 100-kHz sinusoidal frequency modulation, and track a 20000-nm/s sweep with stair-step detail. They further show that the same chip can interrogate a fiber Bragg grating, extracting damped oscillations and 500-Hz acoustic strain at resolutions they state are roughly an order of magnitude finer than the best commercial interrogators.

Load-bearing premise

The demodulation model assumes each photodetector output is a single sinusoid whose deviations from ideal are fully captured by a handful of calibrated bias, amplitude, modulation-depth, and phase parameters, and the paper itself warns in the Discussion that back reflection from adhesively bonded photodetectors can add interferometric ripples that this model does not represent.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • On-chip k-clock generation for OFDR, FMCW LiDAR, and OCT becomes feasible: the paper shows that an OPD of 300 m needed with a conventional unbalanced Mach-Zehnder interferometer could shrink to about 9.16 mm with the sine-cosine OFD, small enough to integrate on a sensing chip.
  • Chip-scale FBG interrogation becomes faster and more sensitive, with projected strain resolution of 0.013 microstrain and temperature resolution of 0.0015 degrees Celsius at 5 Hz bandwidth, improving further if lower-noise electronics are used.
  • Tunable laser sources can be characterized in real time with enough detail to reveal scan nonlinearity, ripple, step overshoot, and scan-rate irregularity, information that could feed closed-loop laser frequency control.
  • The same architecture could be extended to other wavelength bands because TFLN is transparent from 350 nm to 5500 nm, and longer optical path differences on low-loss SiN waveguides could push frequency resolution from 2 MHz toward tens of kilohertz.
  • The device can measure not just frequency but frequency variation rate, enabling detection of chirp rates up to 2500 THz/s with a simple 62.5-MS/s digitizer, which is relevant for FMCW laser chirp characterization.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The calibration model is general enough that the same demodulation should transfer to silicon or silicon-nitride platforms, provided the dispersion of the interferometer's free spectral range is measured; the paper's lookup-table approach does not depend on the TFLN material itself.
  • If butt-coupled InGaAs photodetectors were replaced by heterogeneously integrated photodetectors, as the paper suggests, the back-reflection-induced ripples it identifies as a performance limit could be eliminated, potentially bringing the resolution closer to the 458-kHz DAQ-limited value at 1 MHz bandwidth.
  • The demonstrated ability to resolve 1-pm laser steps and scan ripples suggests the chip could serve as a real-time diagnostic for laser tuning mechanisms, not just as a sensor; that diagnostic role is implied but not developed in the paper.
  • Adding a thermally tunable microring filter or arrayed waveguide grating in front of the OFD could enable real-time frequency monitoring of individual optical comb lines, an extension the paper sketches but does not demonstrate experimentally.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports a photonic integrated circuit (PIC) on thin-film lithium niobate (TFLN) implementing a sine-cosine optical frequency detector (OFD). The device consists of two unbalanced I-Q interferometers: a main interferometer with a 30 GHz FSR for high-resolution incremental frequency measurement and an assistive interferometer with a large FSR for absolute wavelength estimation. Calibration lookup tables capture wavelength-dependent circuit bias, amplitude, modulation depth, and phase imperfections. The authors demonstrate real-time characterization of a tunable laser's wavelength scans, detection of scan ripples and step transients, high-speed measurement up to 2500 THz/s, a claimed resolution down to 2 MHz (0.016 pm) at 5 Hz bandwidth, and an FBG interrogation application with strain resolution 0.1–0.2 µε at 500 Hz.

Significance. If the claims hold, the work is significant: it brings real-time, high-resolution optical frequency variation detection onto a compact chip, with broad wavelength coverage (1480–1640 nm) and potential for k-clock generation, laser frequency monitoring, and FBG interrogation. The paper's strengths include a clearly described demodulation formalism with explicit treatment of device imperfections, a standard Lissajous-fit calibration procedure, a wide operating range, and practical demonstrations with commercial lasers and an FBG strain sensor. The central limitation is that the headline resolution is inferred from visually discerned structure in filtered data rather than from a formal resolution metric, and the demodulation model assumes perfectly sinusoidal detector outputs that the paper's own discussion suggests may be violated.

major comments (3)
  1. [High-resolution OFV measurements; Fig. 6b; Discussion] The claim of a demonstrated resolution down to 2 MHz (0.016 pm) is not supported by a formal resolution metric. Fig. 6b shows a 10 MHz amplitude, 1 Hz sinusoidal modulation after digital low-pass filtering at 5 Hz; the 2 MHz figure is inferred from visual discernibility of the residual structure. No Allan deviation, noise-floor measurement, or statistical detection criterion is provided. Equations (1) and (2) are theoretical formulas with parameters that are not measured in this work. A resolution claim of this magnitude should be established with a proper measurement, such as Allan deviation of the demodulated phase with a stable input, or detection tests of known small frequency steps.
  2. [Supplementary Eqs. (S1)-(S4), (S9); Discussion on back reflection] The demodulation is built entirely on the assumption that each photodetector output is a single sinusoid in phase, with all imperfections captured by the calibration parameters (bias, amplitude, modulation depth, and phase errors). The paper's Discussion explicitly states that back reflection from adhesively butt-coupled InGaAs photodetectors 'may cause back reflection induced interferometric ripples to degrade the OFD performance.' Such ripples are non-sinusoidal and wavelength-dependent, and are not represented in Eqs. (S1)-(S4). If they are present, they will either be absorbed into the fitted calibration parameters or appear as residual phase errors that masquerade as optical frequency variations. The repeatability argument in Fig. 4 does not rule this out, because repeating the same laser scan repeats any artifact tied to wavelength or scan position. The authors should provide a direct test: for example, demodulate a laser whose frequency is independently known to be stable (e.g., via a beat measurement) and compare, or intentionally vary the PD reflection/input polarization to show the demodulated frequency is unchanged.
  3. [Supplementary Section 3: Assistive interferometer calibration] The assistive (lower) interferometer is calibrated by assuming that its phase imperfection parameters α, β, γ are exactly the same as those of the main interferometer because the components are 'identical in design and fabrication,' and that B_lj has the same wavelength response up to a constant factor. This assumption is not verified experimentally. Because the assistive interferometer provides the absolute wavelength estimate used to select wavelength-dependent lookup-table parameters for the main interferometer, a mismatch could introduce systematic errors in the corrected demodulation. The authors should quantify the sensitivity of the final Δf(t) to plausible deviations in the assistive parameters, or perform a direct calibration of the lower interferometer without the identity assumption.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Eq. (S5) and surrounding text] The symbol τ_u is used for the time delay in Eq. (S5), but the text also uses π_u in several places; please make the notation consistent throughout.
  2. [Eq. (3) and Table 1] The symbol B is used for detection bandwidth in Eq. (3), while B_u1 etc. denote signal amplitudes in Eqs. (S1)-(S4); please disambiguate these uses.
  3. [Fig. 5d] The caption states that the data were filtered with a second-order Butterworth low-pass filter at 200 kHz, but the figure shows only the filtered result. Showing an unfiltered segment would help the reader assess the raw noise level.
  4. [Fig. 7d and Discussion] The strain resolution '0.1–0.2 µε at 500 Hz' is described as discerned from the figure; a quantitative criterion (e.g., standard deviation of the noise floor in the demodulated strain) should be reported.
  5. [General presentation] The paper contains several typographical issues (for example, 'FSRU' and 'SNRV' in Eqs. (1)-(4), and 'absolution' in SI Section 3); a careful proofreading pass is recommended.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the demodulation is calibrated against known tunable-laser wavelengths and the measured OFV traces are external to the calibration fits.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained and not circular. The core device model (SI Eqs. S1–S4) is an explicit sinusoidal interferometer model with bias, amplitude, modulation-depth, and phase-imperfection parameters. These parameters are obtained by Lissajous elliptical fits while scanning a tunable laser over more than one FSR at each calibration wavelength (SI Section 2), and the FSR is measured from the periodicity of the same calibration scans. The demodulation formula (Eq. S9) then algebraically inverts that model; the measured optical-frequency variation is the argument of that inversion, not a refitted calibration parameter. The absolute-wavelength lookup table for the lower interferometer is built from the same calibration data and is used only to select the wavelength-dependent upper-interferometer coefficients, which is standard calibration transfer rather than circularity. The paper does cite the first author's prior sine-cosine work (refs. 19, 23–25, 39) for the principle and for the resolution formulas (Eqs. 1–4), but the current manuscript reproduces the relevant mathematics and the headline experimental results (2 MHz resolution, 2500 THz/s speed, ripple characterization, FBG interrogation) are measurements against external lasers and a calibrated strain sensor, not outputs forced by those cited formulas. The Discussion's explicit caveat that adhesively bonded InGaAs photodetectors may cause back-reflection-induced interferometric ripples is a legitimate correctness risk for the sinusoidal model, but it does not make the derivation equivalent to its inputs: an unmodeled distortion would be a measurement artifact, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. No step in the paper reduces, by construction or by self-citation, to its own input, so the circularity score is 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper's central measurements rest on a calibration lookup table built from a tunable laser: per-wavelength values of bias, amplitude, modulation depth, phase errors, and FSR, plus a polynomial mapping phase to wavelength for the assistive interferometer. These are fitted parameters, not predictions. No new physical entities are introduced. The demodulation model is a domain assumption about interferometer linearity and stability.

free parameters (4)
  • Per-wavelength demodulation lookup table (A_j, B_j, m_j, alpha, beta, gamma) = Example at 1519 nm: B_u1=1.0958 V, B_u3=0.9177 V, m_u1=0.976, m_u3=0.95, hybrid phase offset 2.659 degrees
    Fitted by Lissajous ellipse fits every 1 nm and used directly in Eq. S9 to compute OFV.
  • FSR_u(lambda) dispersion curve = About 30 GHz at design, wavelength dependent as in Fig. S3a
    Measured as average periodicity of four interference signals; converts phase increment to frequency increment.
  • Assistive interferometer phase-to-wavelength polynomial = Fourth-order polynomial fit of lambda vs Delta_phi_l, coefficients not reported
    Used to assign absolute wavelength once per measurement and to select upper-interferometer lookup entries.
  • Effective DAQ bits and noise SNR in resolution formulas = Assumed 15-bit effective resolution, 4 V range, noise values in Table 1
    The theoretical resolution table depends on these assumed electronics parameters, not on a measured noise characterization.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Each photodetector output follows a single-sinusoid model with bias, amplitude, modulation depth, and phase imperfections (Eqs. S1-S4).
    The demodulation formula Eq. S9 inverts this model; harmonics, crosstalk, or back-reflection fringes are not included.
  • standard math Lissajous elliptical fits recover all model parameters at each calibration wavelength.
    SI Section 2 relies on elliptical fitting of V_u1 vs V_u3 and related pairs, assuming the recorded signals trace ellipses without additional distortion.
  • standard math Phase unwrapping across 2 pi boundaries correctly determines direction and total frequency change.
    Used after Eq. S9 for frequency reconstruction; assumes no missed cycles due to undersampling.
  • domain assumption The calibration lookup table remains valid during experiments, with temperature held at 30 C by the TEC.
    Methods state TEC is set to 30 C to avoid OPD changes; drift would bias absolute frequency and FSR values.
  • domain assumption The reference tunable laser wavelengths used for calibration are accurate and cover the calibration points.
    Calibration of FSR and phase lookup tables assumes the Santec TSL-570 wavelength readout is trustworthy.
  • domain assumption The noise model in Eqs. (1)-(4) assumes DAQ quantization and white photodetector noise dominate, with known SNR.
    Table 1 resolutions use assumed 15-bit effective DAQ and unspecified noise levels; the assumptions are not experimentally characterized.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On-chip real-time detection of optical frequency variations with ultrahigh resolution using the sine-cosine encoder approach." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/35TLJ4VM

@misc{pith2026250115353,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On-chip real-time detection of optical frequency variations with ultrahigh resolution using the sine-cosine encoder approach},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/35TLJ4VM}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.15353}
}
read the original abstract

Real-time measurement of optical frequency variations (OFVs) is crucial for various applications including laser frequency control, optical computing, and optical sensing. Traditional devices, though accurate, are often too large, slow and costly. Here we present a photonic integrated circuit (PIC) chip, utilizing the sine-cosine encoder principle, for high-speed and high-resolution real-time OFV measurement. Fabricated on a thin film lithium niobate (TFLN) platform, this chip-sized optical frequency detector (OFD) (5.5 mm * 2.7 mm) achieves a speed of up to 2500 THz/s and a resolution as fine as 2 MHz over a range exceeding 160 nm. Our robust algorithm overcomes the device imperfections and ensures precise quantification of OFV parameters. As a practical demonstration, the PIC OFD surpasses existing fiber Bragg grating (FBG) interrogators in sensitivity and speed for strain and vibration measurements. This work opens new avenues for on-chip OFV detection and offers significant potential for diverse applications involving OFV measurement.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.15353 by the authors.

Figure 5
Figure 5. High speed frequency scan and modulation measurement results. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png] view at source ↗
Figure 6
Figure 6. High resolution OFV measurement capability demonstration. a The measured wavelength (frequency) as a laser (Yenista TUNICS T100S-HP) is step-tuned at 1 pm per step. b The measured optical frequency variation when the frequency of a fiber laser (NKT Photonics BASIK E15) is modulated with a sinusoidal waveform at 1 Hz, with the data digitally filtered by a low pass filter (3rd order Butterworth) having a cutoff freque… view at source ↗
Figure 8
Figure 8. Application illustrations of the on-chip OFD. a On-chip k-clock generation for different distributed optical sensing systems (OFD: optical frequency detector, OFDR: optical frequency domain reflectometer, OCT: optical coherence tomography, FMCW LiDAR: frequency modulated continuous wave LiDAR , BPD: Balanced photodetector). b Chip-sized multi-channel fiber Bragg grating (FBG) interrogator (WDM: wavelength division m… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

70 extracted references · 69 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    & Liang, W

    Wu, Y., Deng, L., Yang, K. & Liang, W. Narrow linewidth external cavity laser capable of high repetition frequency tuning for FMCW LiDAR. IEEE Photonics Technol. Lett. 34, 1123-1126 (2022)

    work page 2022

  2. [2]

    Ding, Z. et al. Compensation of laser frequency tuning nonlinearity of a long range OFDR using deskew filter. Opt. Express 21, 3826-3834 (2013)

    work page 2013

  3. [3]

    Ding, Z. et al. Note: Improving spatial resolution of optical frequency-domain reflectometry against frequency tuning nonlinearity using non- uniform fast Fourier transform. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 83, (2012)

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    Chen, Z. et al. Fully integrated on-chip FBG interrogator for high-accuracy measurement of wavelengths. Opt. Lett. 48, 5935-5938 (2023)

    work page 2023

  5. [5]

    D., Bhaskaran, H

    Feldmann, J., Youngblood, N., Wright, C. D., Bhaskaran, H. & Pernice, W. H. All -optical spiking neurosynaptic networks with self-learning capabilities. Nature 569, 208-214 (2019)

    work page 2019

  6. [6]

    Tait, A. N. et al. Neuromorphic photonic networks using silicon photonic weight banks. Sci. Rep. 7, 7430 (2017)

    2017

  7. [7]

    N., De Lima, T

    Tait, A. N., De Lima, T. F., Nahmias, M. A., Shastri, B. J. & Prucnal, P. R. Multi -channel control for microring weight banks. Opt. Express 24, 8895-8906 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [8]

    Tait, A. N. et al. Feedback control for microring weight banks. Opt. Express 26, 26422- 26443 (2018)

    work page 2018

Show all 70 references
  1. [9]

    W., Grillot, F., Bowers, J

    Alkhazraji, E., Chow, W. W., Grillot, F., Bowers, J. E. & Wan, Y. Linewidth narrowing in self-injection-locked on-chip lasers. Light Sci. Appl. 12, 162 (2023)

    2023

  2. [10]

    Guo, J. et al. Chip-based laser with 1-hertz integrated linewidth. Sci. Adv. 8, eabp9006 (2022)

    2022

  3. [11]

    Xiang, C., Morton, P. A. & Bowers, J. E. Ultra-narrow linewidth laser based on a semiconductor gain chip and extended Si 3N4 Bragg grating. Opt. Lett. 44, 3825-3828 (2019)

    2019

  4. [12]

    Xiang, C. et al. Narrow-linewidth III-V/Si/Si 3N4 laser using multilayer heterogeneous integration. Optica 7, 20-21 (2020)

    2020

  5. [13]

    Hall, J. L. Laser Spectroscopy III. (Springer Berlin, Heidelberg, 1977). 23 / 37

    1977

  6. [14]

    Laser Wavelength Meters

    Snyder, J. Laser Wavelength Meters. Laser Focus. (1982)

    1982

  7. [15]

    Gardner, J. L. Compact Fizeau wavemeter. Appl. Opt. 24, 3570-3573 (1985)

    1985

  8. [16]

    F., Smith, K

    Gray, D. F., Smith, K. A. & Dunning, F. B. Simple compact Fizeau wavemeter. Appl. Opt. 25, 1339-1343 (1986)

    1986

  9. [17]

    Derickson, D. a. S. et al. in Fiber optic test and measurement (ed Dennis Derickson) Ch. 4, (Prentice Hall, 1998)

    1998

  10. [18]

    Vobis, J. a. D. et al. in Fiber optic test and measurement (ed Dennis Derickson) Ch. 3, (Prentice Hall, 1998)

    1998

  11. [19]

    Yao, X. S. & Ma, X. S. Sine-Cosine Techniques for Detecting Fast Optical Frequency Variations With Ultra-High Resolution. J. Lightwave Technol. 41, 1041-1053 (2023)

    2023

  12. [20]

    Moore, E. D. & McLeod, R. R. Correction of sampling errors due to laser tuning rate fluctuations in swept-wavelength interferometry. Opt. Express 16, 13139-13149 (2008)

    2008

  13. [21]

    Ahn, T.-J., Lee, J. Y. & Kim, D. Y. Suppression of nonlinear frequency sweep in an optical frequency-domain reflectometer by use of Hilbert transformation. Appl. Opt. 44, 7630- 7634 (2005)

    2005

  14. [22]

    & Kim, D

    Ahn, T.-J. & Kim, D. Y. Analysis of nonlinear frequency sweep in high-speed tunable laser sources using a self-homodyne measurement and Hilbert transformation. Appl. Opt. 46, 2394-2400 (2007)

    2007

  15. [23]

    S., Zhang, B., Chen, X

    Yao, X. S., Zhang, B., Chen, X. & Willner, A. E. Real -time optical spectrum analysis of a light source using a polarimeter. Opt. Express 16, 17854-17863 (2008)

    2008

  16. [24]

    Yao, X. S. & Chen, X. J. Sine-cosine optical frequency encoder devices based on optical polarization properties.). US Patent 10,895,477 (2021)

    2021

  17. [25]

    S., Ma, X

    Yao, X. S., Ma, X. & Feng, T. Fast optical frequency detection techniques for coherent distributed sensing and communication systems. In: 2022 Optical Fiber Communications Conference and Exhibition (OFC)). IEEE (2022)

    2022

  18. [26]

    & Choi, C

    Kim, J.-C., Kim, J.-M., Kim, C.-U. & Choi, C. Ultra precise position estimation of servomotor using analog quadrature encoders. In: Twenty -First Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, 2006. APEC'06.). IEEE (2006). 24 / 37

    2006

  19. [27]

    J enkins, S. T. & Hilkert, J. Sin/cosine encoder interpolation methods: encoder to digital tracking converters for rate and position loop controllers. In: Acquisition, Tracking, Pointing, and Laser Systems Technologies XXII). SPIE (2008)

    2008

  20. [28]

    Xiang, C. et al. Integrated chip-scale Si3N4 wavemeter with narrow free spectral range and high stability. Opt. Lett 41, 3309-3312 (2016)

    2016

  21. [29]

    & Bitauld, D

    Stern, B., Kim, K., Gariah, H. & Bitauld, D. Athermal silicon photonic wavemeter for broadband and high-accuracy wavelength measurements. Opt. Express 29, 29946-29959 (2021)

    2021

  22. [30]

    Applications of optical microcombs

    Sun, Y., et al. Applications of optical microcombs. Adv. Opt. Photonics 15, 86–175 (2023)

    2023

  23. [31]

    R., Baumann, E., Swann, W

    Coddington, I., Giorgetta, F. R., Baumann, E., Swann, W. C. & Newbury, N. R. Characterizing fast arbitrary cw waveforms with 1500 THz/s instantaneous chirps. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 18, 228–238 (2011)

    2011

  24. [32]

    & Newbury, N

    Giorgetta, F., Coddington, I., Baumann, E., Swann, W. & Newbury, N. Fast high-resolution spectroscopy of dynamic continuous-wave laser sources. Nat. Photon. 4, 853–857 (2010)

    2010

  25. [33]

    Vernier spectrometer using counterpropagating soliton microcombs

    Yang, Q.-F., et al. Vernier spectrometer using counterpropagating soliton microcombs. Science 363, 965–968 (2019)

    2019

  26. [34]

    High-performance integrated laser based on thin-film lithium niobate photonics for coherent ranging

    Wang, S., et al. High-performance integrated laser based on thin-film lithium niobate photonics for coherent ranging. Laser Photonics Rev. 17, 2400224 (2023)

    2023

  27. [35]

    & Yao, X

    Hao, P., Wan, Z., Bi, R., Gong, H. & Yao, X. S. Simultaneous optical and RF linear frequency sweep generation using a Fourier domain mode-locked OEO with carrier - suppressed single sideband modulation. Opt. Express 32, 32175–32186 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    Integrated photonics on thin-film lithium niobate

    Zhu, D., et al. Integrated photonics on thin-film lithium niobate. Adv. Opt. Photonics 13, 242–352 (2021)

    2021

  29. [37]

    Lithium niobate photonics: Unlocking the electromagnetic spectrum

    Boes, A., et al. Lithium niobate photonics: Unlocking the electromagnetic spectrum. Science 379, 4396 (2023)

    2023

  30. [38]

    Liang, W. et al. Ultra ‐Fast, Fine ‐Resolution Thin ‐Film Lithium Niobate Spectrometer. Laser Photonics Rev. 2400635 (2024)

    2024

  31. [39]

    Yao, X. S. Sine-cosine optical frequency detection devices for photonics integrated circuits and applications in lidar and other distributed optical sensing.). US Patent 11,619,783 B2 (2023). 25 / 37

    2023

  32. [41]

    E., Nannipieri, T., Oton, C

    Marin, Y. E., Nannipieri, T., Oton, C. J. & Pasquale, F. D. Current status and future trends of photonic-integrated FBG interrogators. J. Lightwave Technol. 36, 946-953 (2018)

    2018

  33. [42]

    Elaskar, J. et al. Ultracompact microinterferometer-based fiber Bragg grating interrogator on a silicon chip. J. Lightwave Technol. 41, 4397-4404 (2023)

    2023

  34. [43]

    A., Arsad, N

    Abushagur, A. A., Arsad, N. & Bakar, A. A. A. Cantilever beam with a single fiber bragg grating to measure temperature and transversal force simultaneously. Sensors 21, 2002 (2021)

    2021

  35. [44]

    & Yao, X

    Ma, X. & Yao, X. S. Single-frequency lasers’ linewidths elegantly characterized with Sigmoid functions of observation time. J. Lightwave Technol. 42, 4569-4584 (2024)

    2024

  36. [45]

    Ultra-wideband waveguide-coupled photodiodes heterogeneously integrated on a thin-film lithium niobate platform

    Wei, C., et al. Ultra-wideband waveguide-coupled photodiodes heterogeneously integrated on a thin-film lithium niobate platform. Light: Adv. Manuf. 4, 263–271 (2023)

    2023

  37. [46]

    & Liu, L

    Xue, Y., Wu, X., Chen, K., Wang, J. & Liu, L. Waveguide integrated high-speed black phosphorus photodetector on a thin film lithium niobate platform. Opt. Mater. Express 13, 272–281 (2023)

    2023

  38. [47]

    & Lončar, M

    Desiatov, B. & Lončar, M. Silicon photodetector for integrated lithium niobate photonics. Appl. Phys. Lett. 115, 151103 (2019)

    2019

  39. [48]

    & Bowers, J

    Piels, M. & Bowers, J. E. Photodetectors for silicon photonic integrated circuits. Photodetectors, 419–436 (2023)

    2023

  40. [49]

    R., et al

    Tamalampudi, S. R., et al. High-speed waveguide-integrated InSe photodetector on SiN photonics for near-infrared applications. Adv. Photonics Res. 4, 2300162 (2023)

    2023

  41. [50]

    High performance, waveguide integrated Ge photodetectors

    Ahn, D., et al. High performance, waveguide integrated Ge photodetectors. Opt. Express 15, 3916–3921 (2007)

    2007

  42. [51]

    & Lončar, M

    Desiatov, B., Shams -Ansari, A., Zhang, M., Wang, C. & Lončar, M. Ultra-low -loss integrated visible photonics using thin-film lithium niobate. Optica 6, 380-384 (2019)

    2019

  43. [52]

    Liu, J. et al. High-yield, wafer -scale fabrication of ultralow -loss, dispersion-engineered silicon nitride photonic circuits. Nat. Commun. 12, 2236 (2021). 26 / 37

    2021

  44. [53]

    & Mégret, P

    Yüksel, K., Wuilpart, M. & Mégret, P. Analysis and suppression of nonlinear frequency modulation in an optical frequency -domain reflectometer. Opt. Express 17, 5845–5851 (2009)

    2009

  45. [54]

    Long distance high resolution FMCW laser ranging with phase noise compensation and 2D signal processing

    Ke, J.-Y., et al. Long distance high resolution FMCW laser ranging with phase noise compensation and 2D signal processing. Appl. Opt. 61, 3443–3454 (2022)

    2022

  46. [55]

    & Fujimoto, J

    Huber, R., Wojtkowski, M. & Fujimoto, J. Fourier domain mode locking (FDML): A new laser operating regime and applications for optical coherence tomography. Opt. Express 14, 3225–3237 (2006)

    2006

  47. [56]

    Cubic meter volume optical coherence tomography

    Wang, Z., et al. Cubic meter volume optical coherence tomography. Optica 3, 1496–1503 (2016)

    2016

  48. [57]

    A., et al

    Roos, P. A., et al. Ultrabroadband optical chirp linearization for precision metrology applications. Opt. Lett. 34, 3692–3694 (2009)

    2009

  49. [58]

    & Koshikiya, Y

    Ito, F., Fan, X. & Koshikiya, Y. Long-range coherent OFDR with light source phase noise compensation. J. Lightwave Technol. 30, 1015–1024 (2011)

    2011

  50. [59]

    & Bowers, J

    Chang, L., Liu, S. & Bowers, J. E. Integrated optical frequency comb technologies. Nat. Photon. 16, 95-108 (2022)

    2022

  51. [60]

    & Yoo, S

    Cheung, S., Su, T., Okamoto, K. & Yoo, S. Ultra-compact silicon photonic 512×512 25 GHz arrayed waveguide grating router. IEEE J. Sel. Top. Quantum Electron. 20, 310-316 (2013)

    2013

  52. [61]

    On-chip real-time detection of optical frequency variations with ultrahigh resolution using the sine-cosine encoder approach

    Ovvyan, A., Gruhler, N., Ferrari, S. & Pernice, W. Cascaded Mach–Zehnder interferometer tunable filters. J. Opt. 18, 064011 (2016). Acknowledgements This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (62405382 to Z.L., 62293523 to X.C); Natural...

    2016

  53. [62]

    𝑢𝑢” with “𝑙𝑙

    More detailed device description In our implementation, each 90° hybrid is made with a 2×4 multimode interference (MMI) coupler1, although other types of 90° hybrid can also be implemented2-6. The eight output ports of the two MMI couplers are attached with eight photodetector...

  54. [63]

    The setup for calibrating and evaluating the sine-cosine PIC OFD is shown in Fig

    Upper (main) I-Q interferometer calibration As described in Device Calibration subsection, the fabricated device is not perfect, with many parameters deviating from ideal values and wavelength dependent, which must be 32 / 37 obtained by calibration at different wavelengths. T...

  55. [64]

    𝜆𝜆 obtained from calibration

    Lower (assistive) I-Q interferometer calibration As mentioned in section 2, the lower or the assistive interferometer can be used to determine the absolution wavelength 𝜆𝜆 or frequency of unknown light sources from the lookup table of Δ𝜑𝜑 𝑙𝑙 vs. 𝜆𝜆 obtained from calibration. L...

  56. [65]

    Device Fabrication Figure S5 presents the fabrication process of the proposed device using an x-cut LNOI wafer (NANOLN), which consists of a 360 -nm-thick X-cut LN layer and a 4.7-µm-thick buried oxide 36 / 37 layer. The fabrication process is detailed below: a Clearing the wa...

  57. [66]

    Tan, H. et al. C-Band optical 90-degree hybrid using thin film lithium niobate. Opt. Lett.48, 1946-1949 (2023)

    2023

  58. [67]

    Faralli, S. et al. A compact silicon coherent receiver without waveguide crossing. IEEE Photonics Journal 7, 1-6 (2015)

    2015

  59. [68]

    Lee, S. Y . et al. Cost-effective 400-Gbps micro-intradyne coherent receiver using optical butt-coupling and FPCB wirings. Opt. Express 26, 28453-28460 (2018)

    2018

  60. [69]

    & Weinert, C.-M

    Seimetz, M. & Weinert, C.-M. Options, feasibility, and availability of 2 × 4 90° hybrids for coherent optical systems. J. Lightwave Technol. 24, 1317 (2006)

    2006

  61. [70]

    Zhang, J. et al. Compact low-power-consumption 28-Gbaud QPSK/16-QAM integrated silicon photonic/electronic coherent receiver. IEEE Photonics Journal 8, 1-10 (2016)

    2016

  62. [71]

    Soldano, L. B. & Pennings, E. C. Optical multi-mode interference devices based on self- imaging: principles and applications. J. Lightwave Technol. 13, 615-627 (1995)

    1995

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.