Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 4 minor 33 references

Brieskorn-Pham singularities via ACM bundles on Geigle-Lenzing projective spaces

T0 review · 2 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read For every quadrangle Brieskorn-Pham singularity, the paper constructs a tilting object in the stable category of ACM bundles whose endomorphism algebra is the fourfold tensor product of Nakayama algebras, and it counts the Picard orbits…

desk verdict 2-extension bundles give a plausible and genuinely new tilting object for GL projective planes, and the orbit formula is a real result; the paper needs a fix to Corollary 7.5 and a proper proof of Proposition 2.5 before I would trust the main theorems. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.15375 v1 pith:3VCQL5D3 submitted 2025-01-26 math.AG math.RT

Jianmin Chen , Shiquan Ruan , Weikang Weng This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AGmath.RT MSC 14F0516G1016G5018E30
keywords Brieskorn-PhamsingularityGeigle-Lenzingprojectivespace2-extensionbundlearithmeticallyCohen-MacaulaytiltingobjectNakayamaalgebracategoryweightedline
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Each four-variable Brieskorn-Pham singularity $R=k[X_1,\dots,X_4]/(\sum X_i^{p_i})$ is shown to have a singularity category that can be computed from an explicit finite-dimensional algebra. The paper introduces 2-extension bundles — rank-four exceptional vector bundles defined by a specific four-term exact sequence on the associated Geigle-Lenzing projective plane — and proves that a single 2-Auslander bundle and its twisted shifts form a tilting object, with endomorphism ring a fourfold tensor product of Nakayama algebras. It also counts the orbits of these bundles under line-bundle twist, giving a closed formula that answers a higher-dimensional analogue of an open question raised for weighted projective lines. A sympathetic reader should care because the stable category of arithmetically Cohen-Macaulay (ACM) bundles is thereby replaced by a quiver with relations, making homological invariants of the singularity explicitly computable.

What carries the argument

The central object is the 2-extension bundle $E_L\langle \vec{x}\rangle$, defined for $0 \le \vec{x} \le \vec{\delta}$ as the middle term of the unique nonsplit exact sequence $$0 \to L(\vec{\omega}) \to E \to \bigoplus_{i=1}^4 L(\vec{x}-(1+\lambda_i)\vec{x}_i) \xrightarrow{\gamma} L(\vec{x}) \to 0.$$ These are exceptional rank-four ACM bundles. The argument is carried by three mechanisms: (i) the suspension formula (4.8), which expresses $E_L\langle \vec{x}\rangle[1]$ as another 2-extension bundle with an explicit line-bundle twist, so that 2-coextension bundles are suspensions of 2-extension bundles and the suspension functor preserves the class; (ii) Proposition 2.5, which asserts that two exceptional vector bundles with the same Grothendieck class are isomorphic, allowing class computations to be converted into bundle isomorphisms; and (iii) the tilting object $T = \bigoplus_{0\le \vec{x}\le \vec{\delta}} E_L(\vec{x})[-\sigma(\vec{x})]$, whose Hom spaces are computed via Proposition 6.3 and yield the tensor product of Nakayama algebras through a quiver with commuting variables and relations $x_i^2 = 0$.

What would settle it

Search for two non-isomorphic exceptional vector bundles on a Geigle-Lenzing projective plane with equal Grothendieck class; any such pair would falsify Proposition 2.5 and collapse the suspension formula and orbit classification. A simpler check for small weight quadruples such as $(2,2,3,3)$ is to list the 2-extension bundles explicitly and verify both the tilting condition for $T$ and the predicted orbit count $|V/L|=1$.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper establishes two main results. First, for any quadruple of weights $p_i \ge 2$, the stable category $\underline{\mathsf{ACM}}\,\mathbb{X}$ of arithmetically Cohen-Macaulay bundles on the associated Geigle-Lenzing projective plane is generated by a tilting object $$T = \bigoplus_{0\le \vec{x}\le \vec{\delta}} E_L(\vec{x})[-\$\sigma$(\vec{x})],$$ whose endomorphism algebra is $\operatorname{End}(T)^{\mathrm{op}} \cong \bigotimes_{i=1}^4 k\vec{A}_{p_i-1}(2)$. Hence the graded singularity category of the Brieskorn-Pham singularity $R$ is triangle equivalent to the derived category of this explicit finite-dimensional algebra. Second, the Picard group action on 2-extension bundles has exactly $$|V/L| = \frac{1}{8}\sum_{\substack{I\subset J\\ |I|\text{ even}}} \prod_{i\in I^c}(p_i-1)$$ orbits, where $J$ is the set of even weights. This answers positively a higher version of an open question stated in the weighted projective line literature. The paper also proves a bijection between 2-extension bundles, 2-coextension bundles, and the specific Cohen-Macaulay modules $U_{\vec{\ell}}$ studied in the cited framework of Geigle-Lenzing complete intersections.

Load-bearing premise

The proofs assume that two exceptional vector bundles on the associated Geigle-Lenzing projective plane with the same Grothendieck class must be isomorphic (Proposition 2.5); this rigidity is imported from the weighted projective line argument and is what turns class equalities into bundle isomorphisms throughout.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The graded singularity category of every quadrangle Brieskorn-Pham singularity is triangle equivalent to the derived category of the explicit algebra $\bigotimes_{i=1}^4 k\vec{A}_{p_i-1}(2)$, so Ext groups in the singularity category become computable from a quiver with relations.
  • The 2-extension bundles are, up to suspension and degree shift, the sheafifications of the Cohen-Macaulay modules $U_{\vec{\ell}}$ from the cited Geigle-Lenzing framework; this ties the new bundle class to representation-theoretic invariants of the ring $R$.
  • For weight type $(2,a,b,c)$, every indecomposable rank-four ACM bundle is a 2-extension bundle, and no indecomposable ACM bundles of rank two or three exist.
  • The Picard group action on 2-extension bundles is transitive exactly for the weight quadruples $(2,2,2,2)$, $(2,2,2,3)$ and $(2,2,3,3)$; in all other cases the orbit count is given by the closed formula of Theorem 1.3.
  • The tilting 4-cuboid and the shifted tilting object are derived equivalent, so the two tensor-product algebras $\bigotimes k\vec{A}_{p_i-1}$ and $\bigotimes k\vec{A}_{p_i-1}(2)$ are derived-equivalent endomorphism rings.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If Conjecture 5.3 holds for all weight quadruples, then the stable category would be generated by line bundles together with 2-extension bundles, giving a complete quiver-with-relations presentation of the singularity category without resolution of singularities.
  • The orbit formula depends only on the parity pattern and the sizes of the odd weights; in particular the transitive cases are exactly those with all even weights equal to 2 and all odd weights equal to 3, with at most two odd weights.
  • One testable extension is to define $n$-extension bundles from $(n+1)$-term exact sequences on higher-dimensional Geigle-Lenzing spaces; the tensor-product form of the endomorphism algebra suggests the pattern $k\vec{A}_{p_i-1}(n)$ will persist.
  • The derived equivalence between the cuboid and the shifted tilting object hints that the singularity category may carry a cluster structure analogous to the weighted projective line case, where extension bundles give cluster tilting objects.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper studies the singularity category of the Brieskorn-Pham singularity R = k[X_1,...,X_4]/(sum X_i^{p_i}) by representing it as the stable category of arithmetically Cohen-Macaulay bundles on the associated Geigle-Lenzing projective plane X. It introduces 2-extension bundles and 2-coextension bundles, establishes a correspondence with a class of graded Cohen-Macaulay modules studied by Herschend-Iyama-Minamoto-Oppermann, constructs a tilting object in the stable category whose endomorphism algebra is a tensor product of Nakayama algebras, and derives an explicit formula for the number of Picard-group orbits of 2-extension bundles, thereby answering a higher-dimensional analogue of a question of Kussin-Lenzing-Meltzer.

Significance. If the main results are correct, the paper provides a concrete finite-dimensional algebraic model for the singularity category of every quadrangle Brieskorn-Pham singularity, including a tilting object built from 2-Auslander bundles and a clean, falsifiable orbit-counting formula. The paper contains substantial explicit computation and a coherent translation of the weighted projective line framework to GL projective planes. The orbit formula is a strong, checkable statement, and the proposed tilting object is a natural higher-dimensional analog of the KLM construction. However, two load-bearing points need attention: the proof of Proposition 2.5 is terse and appears to transfer a hereditary-category argument to a non-hereditary setting, and Corollary 7.5 is false as stated because it omits the transitive case (2,3,3,3).

major comments (2)
  1. [§2.3, Proposition 2.5] The proof of Proposition 2.5 is not sufficient as written. The cited result [15, Proposition 3.28] shows that a vector bundle with zero Grothendieck class is zero, but it does not show that two exceptional vector bundles with equal classes are isomorphic. The argument transferred from [27, Proposition 4.4.1] relies on the hereditary nature of weighted projective lines, where a nonzero morphism between exceptional bundles of the same class is forced to be an isomorphism; a GL projective plane has global dimension two, and the same conclusion does not follow from the cited statement. This is load-bearing: Proposition 2.5 is used in Proposition 4.6 to derive the suspension formula (4.8), in Proposition 4.15 to identify the cone C with the shifted 2-extension bundle, and in Appendix A to convert class equalities into isomorphisms. The authors should either give a self-contained proof for GL projective planes or cite a precise statement in [15] that establishes this uniqueness property in that setting.
  2. [§7, Corollary 7.5] The transitivity classification in Corollary 7.5 is false as stated. For the weight quadruple (2,3,3,3), the set of even weights is J = {1}, and Theorem 7.4 yields |V/L| = (1/8) * product_{i=1}^4 (p_i - 1) = (1/8) * 1 * 2 * 2 * 2 = 1. Thus the Picard-group action on 2-extension bundles is transitive, but this case is missing from the list in Corollary 7.5, which states that transitivity holds only for (2,2,2,2), (2,2,2,3), and (2,2,3,3). The corollary should be repaired by adding (2,3,3,3) and by checking that no other cases arise; the contradiction with the formula in Theorem 7.4 is immediate.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Title and abstract] The title page contains a typo: 'SP ACES' should be 'SPACES', and the abstract begins with 'W e' instead of 'We'.
  2. [Throughout §3 and §4] The word 'gived' appears repeatedly (e.g., in the paragraphs defining 2-extension bundles and 2-coextension bundles); it should be 'given'.
  3. [Proposition 3.12] The proof explicitly proves only the second equality, π(ρ(k)) = F[1], and says the first equality 'can be shown similarly'. Expanding this would improve readability, since the statement E[2] = π(ρ(k)) is used implicitly later.
  4. [§1 and §3] The notation EL⟨x⟩ is introduced before the reader is told that x = sum λ_i x_i with 0 ≤ x ≤ δ; in Proposition 4.15 and Corollary 4.16, the λ_i appearing in the shifted term EL⟨x - λ_i x_i⟩((1+λ_i)x_i) should be explicitly defined immediately before use.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the tilting and orbit-counting results are derived from explicit exact sequences, Hom computations, and external theorems, not from their own conclusions.

full rationale

The paper's central constructions (2-extension bundles and 2-coextension bundles) are defined by explicit nonsplit exact sequences, and their exceptionality and ACM properties are proved in Sections 3-4 through Hom/Ext computations, injective hulls, projective covers, and Serre duality. The suspension formula (4.8) and the distinguished triangle (4.12) are obtained by comparing Grothendieck classes of exceptional objects and invoking Proposition 2.5, which is transferred from Meltzer's weighted projective line result [27, Prop. 4.4.1] using [15, Prop. 3.28]; these are external citations, and no author self-citation is load-bearing (reference [8] does not appear in the body). The correspondence with HIMO modules (Theorem 5.1) is proved by applying the graded global section functor to the defining sequence and using the suspension formula, not assumed. The tilting object (Theorem 6.2) is built from explicitly shifted 2-Auslander bundles, and its endomorphism algebra is computed from the Hom-space description in Proposition 6.3, whose proof is a case analysis over the line-bundle summands of injective hulls and projective covers. The orbit formula (Theorem 7.4) is a Burnside count whose fixed-point sets are computed from Proposition 7.1, which itself is proved by comparing projective covers of 2-extension bundles. No fitted parameter is renamed as a prediction, no uniqueness theorem is imported from the authors' own prior work, and no central assertion reduces by definition to an input. The only potentially fragile point, Proposition 2.5, concerns the transfer of a classification statement to GL projective planes; even if that transfer were incomplete, that would be a correctness gap, not a circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The central claim rests on the HIMO theory of Geigle-Lenzing projective spaces (AR-duality, K0 basis, the equivalence with CM modules) and on the transferred exceptional-object criterion Proposition 2.5. No numerical free parameters are fitted; all new objects are explicitly constructed.

assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The base field k is algebraically closed and all weights p_i ≥ 2.
    Used throughout for the GL projective space construction and the singularity category.
  • domain assumption coh X has global dimension 2, satisfies Auslander-Reiten-Serre duality, and the Ext formula (2.4) for line bundles holds (from HIMO [15]).
    Basis for all Hom and Ext computations in Sections 3-7.
  • domain assumption Sheafification induces triangle equivalences ACM̲X ≃ CM̲L_R ≃ D^L_sg(R) (from HIMO [15]).
    Justifies studying the singularity category via ACM bundles.
  • domain assumption K0(coh X) is free with basis [O(x)] for 0≤x≤2c, and the rank function is well-defined (from HIMO [15]).
    Used for the exceptional-object-class argument in Proposition 2.5 and the suspension formula.
  • domain assumption An exceptional vector bundle with class zero in K0 is zero, and two exceptional bundles with equal class are isomorphic (Proposition 2.5, adapted from Meltzer [27] and [15, Prop 3.28]).
    Load-bearing for Propositions 4.6, 4.15, A.2 and the orbit classification.
invented entities (2)
  • 2-extension bundle E_L⟨x⟩ independent evidence
    purpose: A rank-four ACM bundle defined by the exact sequence (3.3); the higher-dimensional analog of KLM extension bundles.
    Defined explicitly via a nonsplit Yoneda 2-extension; its existence, exceptionality and correspondence to CM modules are proved within the paper.
  • 2-coextension bundle F_L⟨x⟩ independent evidence
    purpose: Dual object to 2-extension bundles; equal to E_L⟨x⟩[1] by Proposition 4.5.
    Defined via the dual exact sequence (3.9); its relationship to E_L⟨x⟩ is proved within the paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Brieskorn-Pham singularities via ACM bundles on Geigle-Lenzing projective spaces." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3VCQL5D3

@misc{pith2026250115375,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Brieskorn-Pham singularities via ACM bundles on Geigle-Lenzing projective spaces},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3VCQL5D3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.15375}
}
abstract

We study the singularity category of the Brieskorn-Pham singularity $R=k[X_1, \dots, X_4]/(\sum_{i=1}^{4} X_i^{p_i})$, associated with the Geigle-Lenzing projective space $\mathbb{X}$ of weight quadruple $(p_1,\dots, p_4)$, by investigating the stable category $\underline{\mathsf{ACM}} \, \mathbb{X}$ of arithmetically Cohen-Macaulay bundles on $\mathbb{X}$. We introduce the notion of $2$-extension bundles on $\mathbb{X}$, which is a higher dimensional analog of extension bundles on a weighted projective line of Geigle-Lenzing, and then establish a correspondence between $2$-extension bundles and a certain important class of Cohen-Macaulay $R$-modules studied by Herschend-Iyama-Minamoto-Oppermann. Furthermore, we construct a tilting object in $\underline{\mathsf{ACM}} \, \mathbb{X}$ consisting of $2$-extension bundles, whose endomorphism algebra is a $4$-fold tensor product of certain Nakayama algebras. We also investigate the Picard group action on $2$-extension bundles and obtain an explicit formula for the orbit number, which gives a positive answer to a higher version of an open question raised by Kussin-Lenzing-Meltzer.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [8]

    Q. Dong, S. Ruan, On two open questions for extension bundles . J. Algebra 662 (2025), 407–430

    work page 2025

  2. [15]

    Herschend, O

    M. Herschend, O. Iyama, H. Minamoto, S. Oppermann, Representation theory of Geigle- Lenzing complete intersections . Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 285 (1412) (2023). BP SINGULARITIES VIA ACM BUNDLES ON GL PROJECTIVE SPACES 33

    work page 2023

  3. [1]

    Amiot, O

    C. Amiot, O. Iyama, I. Reiten, Stable categories of Cohen-Macaulay modules and cluster categories. Amer. J. Math, 137 (3) (2015) 813–857

    work page 2015

  4. [2]

    Auslander, I

    M. Auslander, I. Reiten, Almost split sequences for Z-graded rings . Singularities, represen- tation of algebras, and vector bundles (Lambrecht, 1985), 2 32–243, Lecture Notes in Math., 1273, Springer, Berlin, 1987

    work page 1985

  5. [3]

    A. I. Bondal, Representations of associative algebras and coherent shea ves. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 53 (1) (1989) 25–44

    work page 1989

  6. [4]

    A. I. Bondal, M. M. Kapranov, Representable functors, Serre functors, and reconstructi ons. Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 53 (6) (1989) 1183–1205

    work page 1989

  7. [5]

    R. O. Buchweitz, Maximal Cohen-Macaulay modules and Tate cohomology . Mathematical Surveys and Monographs, 262, American Mathematical Societ y, Providence, RI, 2021

    work page 2021

  8. [6]

    Casanellas, R

    M. Casanellas, R. Hartshorne, ACM bundles on cubic surfaces . J. Eur. Math. Soc. (JEMS) 13 (3) (2011) 709–731

    work page 2011

Show all 33 references
  1. [7]

    Costa, R

    L. Costa, R. M. Mir´ o-Roig, J. Pons-Llopis, The representation type of Segre varieties . Adv. Math. 230 (4-6) (2012), 1995–2013

    2012

  2. [9]

    Ebeling, The Poincar´ e series of some special quasihomogeneous surf ace singularities

    W. Ebeling, The Poincar´ e series of some special quasihomogeneous surf ace singularities . Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 39 (2) (2003), 393–413

    2003

  3. [10]

    Ebeling, D

    W. Ebeling, D. Ploog, McKay correspondence for the Poincar´ e series of Kleinian a nd Fuch- sian singularities . Math. Ann. 347 (3) (2010), 689–702

    2010

  4. [11]

    Futaki, K

    M. Futaki, K. Ueda, Homological mirror symmetry for Brieskorn-Pham singulari ties. Selecta Math. (N.S.) 17 (2) (2011), 435–452

    2011

  5. [12]

    Geigle, H

    W. Geigle, H. Lenzing, A class of weighted projective curves arising in representa tion theory of finite-dimensional algebras . Singularities, representation of algebras, and vector bu ndles (Lambrecht, 1985), 265–297, Lecture Notes in Math., 1273, S pringer, Berlin, 1987

    1985

  6. [13]

    Geigle, H

    W. Geigle, H. Lenzing, Perpendicular categories with applications to representa tions and sheaves. J. Algebra 144 (2) (1991), 273–343

    1991

  7. [14]

    Happel, Triangulated categories in the representation theory of fin ite-dimensional alge- bras

    D. Happel, Triangulated categories in the representation theory of fin ite-dimensional alge- bras. London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, 119, Cam bridge University Press, Cambridge, 1988

    1988

  8. [16]

    Hille, J

    L. Hille, J. M¨ uller, On tensor products of path algebras of type A. Linear Algebra Appl. 448 (2014), 222–244

    2014

  9. [17]

    Iyama, Cluster tilting for higher Auslander algebras

    O. Iyama, Cluster tilting for higher Auslander algebras . Adv. Math. 226 (1) (2011), 1–61

    2011

  10. [18]

    Iyama, B

    O. Iyama, B. Lerner, Tilting bundles on orders on Pd. Israel J. Math. 211 (1) (2016), 147–169

    2016

  11. [19]

    Iyama, R

    O. Iyama, R. Takahashi, Tilting and cluster tilting for quotient singularities . Math. Ann. 356 (3) (2013), 1065–1105

    2013

  12. [20]

    Kajiura, K

    H. Kajiura, K. Saito, A. Takahashi, Matrix factorization and representations of quivers. II. Type ADE case. Adv. Math. 211 (1) (2007), 327–362

    2007

  13. [21]

    Kajiura, K

    H. Kajiura, K. Saito, A. Takahashi, Triangulated categories of matrix factorizations for regular systems of weights with ǫ = − 1. Adv. Math. 220 (5) (2009), 1602–1654

    2009

  14. [22]

    Kussin, H

    D. Kussin, H. Lenzing, H. Meltzer, Triangle singularities, ADE-chains, and weighted projec- tive lines . Adv. Math. 237 (2013), 194–251

    2013

  15. [23]

    Kussin, H

    D. Kussin, H. Lenzing, H. Meltzer, Nilpotent operators and weighted projective lines . J. Reine Angew. Math. 685 (2013), 33–71

    2013

  16. [24]

    Lenzing, Rings of singularities

    H. Lenzing, Rings of singularities . Bull. Iranian Math. Soc. 37 (2) (2011), 235–271

    2011

  17. [25]

    Lenzing, Weighted projective lines and applications

    H. Lenzing, Weighted projective lines and applications . Representations of algebras and re- lated topics, 153–187, EMS Ser. Congr. Rep., Eur. Math. Soc. , Zurich, 2011

    2011

  18. [26]

    Lenzing, J

    H. Lenzing, J. A. de la Pe˜ na, Extended canonical algebras and Fuchsian singularities . Math. Z., 268 (1-2) (2011), 143–167

    2011

  19. [27]

    Meltzer, Exceptional vector bundles, tilting sheaves and tilting co mplexes for weighted projective lines

    H. Meltzer, Exceptional vector bundles, tilting sheaves and tilting co mplexes for weighted projective lines. Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 171 (808) (2004)

    2004

  20. [28]

    Orlov, Triangulated categories of singularities and D-branes in L andau-Ginzburg models

    D. Orlov, Triangulated categories of singularities and D-branes in L andau-Ginzburg models. Proc. Steklov Inst. Math. 246 (3) (2004) 227–248

    2004

  21. [29]

    Orlov, Derived categories of coherent sheaves and triangulated ca tegories of singularities

    D. Orlov, Derived categories of coherent sheaves and triangulated ca tegories of singularities . in: Algebra, Arithmetic, and Geometry: in honor of Yu. I. Man in. Vol. II, in: Progr. Math., vol. 270, Birkh¨ auser Boston Inc., Boston MA, 2009, 503–531

    2009

  22. [30]

    C. M. Ringel, Tame algebras and integral quadratic forms . Lecture Notes in Mathematics,

  23. [31]

    J. P. Serre, Faisceaux alg´ ebriques coh´ erents. Ann. of Math. 61 (2) (1955), 197–278

    1955

  24. [32]

    Yoshino, Cohen-Macaulay modules over Cohen-Macaulay rings

    Y. Yoshino, Cohen-Macaulay modules over Cohen-Macaulay rings . London Mathematical Society Lecture Note Series, 146, Cambridge University Pre ss, Cambridge, 1990. Jianmin Chen, Shiquan Ruan and Weikang Weng School of Mathematical Sciences, Xiamen University, Xiamen, 361005, Fu...

    1990

  25. [1099]

    Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 1984

    1984

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.