Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 44 references

Self-modulated multimode silicon cavity optomechanics

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Two silicon nanobeam phonon modes can lase together without external drive.

desk verdict First intrinsic multimode phonon lasing via self-pulsing, but the probe-cavity measurement needs a crosstalk control to close the case. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.16914 v1 pith:SDX74RSY submitted 2025-01-28 physics.optics nlin.AOnlin.CD

David Alonso-Tomás , Carlos Mas Arabí , Carles Milián , Néstor E. Capuj , Alejandro Martínez , Daniel Navarro-Urrios This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsnlin.AOnlin.CD
keywords cavityoptomechanicsphononlasermultimodelasingself-pulsingsiliconnanobeamfree-carrierdispersionthermo-opticeffectmodecompetition
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper claims that a silicon optomechanical nanobeam can sustain simultaneous phonon lasing in two mechanical modes using only its own intrinsic self-pulsing, with no external modulation. In the demonstrated regime, the self-pulsing limit cycle generated by free-carrier dispersion and thermo-optic effects synchronously pumps both modes, driving them into high-amplitude, self-sustained, coherent oscillations. This works even though the two flexural modes have similar spatial distributions and comparable frequencies, where strong mode competition usually forces one mode to win. The coexistence persists even when the frequency ratio deviates from the exact 9:4 relation, so the optical power can be quasi-periodic or chaotic while the mechanical oscillations stay coherent. The authors support the observations with a macroscopic model that reproduces the periodic, quasi-periodic, and chaotic multimode lasing states.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is self-pulsing (SP), a limit cycle of the intra-cavity photon number driven by the competition between free-carrier dispersion and thermo-optic effects in silicon. Under continuous-wave illumination, the cavity detuning depends on carrier density, temperature, and mechanical displacement (Eq. 1); the photon number follows the instantaneous steady-state Lorentzian (Eq. 2), and coupled rate equations for carriers and temperature (Eq. 3) produce a self-sustained oscillation of intra-cavity power. Each mechanical mode obeys a damped oscillator driven by radiation pressure (Eq. 4), so the SP cycle acts as a time-varying pump whose repetition rate can lock to one or both mechanical frequencies. The paper shows that when SP locks to the first harmonic of one mode and the second harmonic of another, the power distribution over a Lissajous cycle becomes asymmetric, providing a net driving force that sustains both oscillators. A bifurcation analysis of the same equations identifies Hopf and period-doubling bifurcations that lead to the multimode states, with quasi-periodicity arising from a torus bifurcation.

What would settle it

Detune the probe laser far from the probe cavity's optical resonance and repeat the measurement: if the sharp $f_3$ and $f_5$ peaks still appear in the probe channel, or if they appear when the two cavities are mechanically decoupled but still share the same optical input, the signal would be crosstalk rather than mechanical coupling, and the multimode claim would need reinterpretation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is a stable state of multimode phonon lasing that arises intrinsically: the self-pulsing cycle adapts to the optomechanical perturbations of two mechanical modes and synchronously pumps both, overcoming mode competition without external optical modulation. The two modes, the three-antinode mode $f_3 \approx 53$ MHz and the five-antinode mode $f_5 \approx 120$ MHz, approach the harmonic relation $4f_5 = 9f_3$ but do not need to satisfy it exactly. In the experiment, a frequency detuning $f_d = 4f_5 - 9f_3$ of about 1 MHz remains, and sidebands at integer multiples of $f_d$ appear; the modes nevertheless maintain high-amplitude coherent oscillations. The same qualitative behavior is reproduced by the numerical model, which also predicts a periodic multimode state at exact locking, and the authors verify the mechanical origin of the signal by probing the oscillations with a second optomechanical cavity coupled through the common frame. The paper further reports that the regime survives even when the intra-cavity power becomes quasi-periodic or chaotic, and that three-mode simultaneous lasing is observable in a narrow detuning window.

Load-bearing premise

The argument that both mechanical modes really are lasing stands on the claim that the peaks seen in the probe cavity's optical channel come from mechanical motion transmitted through the shared frame, rather than from optical or electrical crosstalk between the two channels; the paper does not report a direct measurement of that isolation.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Multimode phonon lasing can be achieved in a chip-integrated silicon cavity without any external radio-frequency or optical modulation, removing a cost and complexity barrier.
  • The same self-pulsing mechanism can generate optical frequency combs at low repetition rates, set by the mechanical mode spacing rather than by the much faster optical cavity dynamics.
  • Because the regime persists for non-integer frequency ratios, device fabrication tolerances do not need to hit an exact harmonic relation to observe simultaneous lasing.
  • The mechanical-probe technique demonstrates that a second cavity placed nearby can read out coherent mechanical oscillations without disturbing the lasing cavity, enabling separate transduction of the phonon signal.
  • The observation of three-mode lasing suggests that more than two phonon modes can be synchronously pumped when their frequencies approximate integer ratios, opening a path to multi-tone coherent sources.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the adaptability of SP is as generic as demonstrated, similar self-pulsing mechanisms in other nonlinear cavities with comparable thermal and carrier nonlinearities should also be able to pump multiple mechanical modes without external drives.
  • The asymmetry in intra-cavity power over the mechanical Lissajous cycle suggests a design rule: tailoring the optical mode to concentrate power at one phase of the mechanical motion could maximize the synchronous pumping efficiency in future multimode phonon lasers.
  • The fact that the follower mode adapts more than the dominant mode hints that engineering the frequency ratio close to, but not exactly at, an integer relation could stabilize phase-locked operation; this is a testable extension the paper does not explicitly pursue.
  • The mechanical-probe two-cavity geometry could be used as a general tool to distinguish genuine multimode synchronization from optical artifacts in other optomechanical experiments, since it transduces motion independently of the pump cavity.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports an experimental and theoretical study of multimode phonon lasing in a silicon optomechanical nanobeam. The authors show that self-pulsing, a self-induced modulation of intracavity power arising from free-carrier and thermo-optic nonlinearities, can synchronously pump two flexural mechanical modes (M3 and M5) and drive them into simultaneous high-amplitude coherent oscillations without any external modulation. The evidence includes RF spectra with sidebands at the inter-mode frequency mismatch fd = 4f5 - 9f3, autocorrelation beating at the 9:4 ratio, phase-noise measurements, a second-cavity mechanical probe, and a numerical model with a bifurcation analysis that yields stable periodic MML states. The authors further report quasi-periodic and chaotic regimes of the optical power in which the mechanical modes are claimed to remain coherent, with an appendix extending the observation to three mechanical modes.

Significance. If confirmed, this is a notable advance: it demonstrates intrinsic multimode phonon lasing in mechanical modes with similar frequencies and spatial overlap, overcoming mode competition without external modulation. The paper has real strengths: the main observations are supported by multiple independent diagnostics; the model parameters are listed and taken largely from independent measurements rather than fitted to the MML claim; the bifurcation analysis identifies stable periodic MML solutions; and Appendix D extends the phenomenon to three modes. The principal weakness is the unquantified optical isolation in the probe-cavity experiment, which is the only direct mechanical readout separating frame motion from the self-pulsing optical modulation in the main channel.

major comments (2)
  1. [Section F, Fig. 5] The probe-cavity measurement is the only experimental channel that separates mechanical motion of the common frame from the self-pulsing optical modulation in the main cavity. The manuscript states that the cavities 'support separate optical resonances, ensuring no optical crosstalk,' but no quantitative isolation measurement is provided. Because the probe laser is deliberately held in a quiet, non-lasing regime while the main channel produces strong narrowband RF tones at f3 and f5, leakage of main-channel light through the wavelength filter or the shared taper could produce f3/f5 peaks in the probe channel even in the absence of mechanical coupling. Please add a control measurement, for example recording the probe-channel RF with the main laser detuned outside the SP range or with the main path blocked under identical filter settings, or provide the filter rejection and an upper bound on the leakage power relative to the observed probe peaks. Without this, the mechanical origin of the narrow f3/f5 peaks in Fig. 5c is not established, and the central claim of simultaneous high-amplitude mechanical oscillation is not fully supported by the probe experiment.
  2. [Section D and Appendix C, Fig. 8] The abstract claims that in the chaotic regime the mechanical modes 'maintain coherent, high-amplitude oscillations.' The experimental support for this specific claim is indirect: Fig. 8 shows a stable RF comb in the main channel during chaotic SP, but no probe-cavity measurement or time-domain coherence analysis is provided for the chaotic state, and the mechanical amplitudes in this regime come only from the numerical model. Please either add a probe measurement in the chaotic region or explicitly limit the experimental claim to periodic and quasi-periodic MML and present the chaotic case as model-supported. This is important because the chaotic MML regime is highlighted in the abstract and discussion.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section E, Fig. 4h-i] The text says 'sidebands appear at 145 KHz from both peaks, in addition to those observed at integer multiples of fd.' From the quoted frequencies (f3 = 53.50 MHz, f5 = 120.19 MHz), fd = 4f5 - 9f3 is approximately 0.74 MHz, so it is unclear how the 145 kHz sidebands relate to fd. Please clarify the relationship or correct the values.
  2. [Appendix A] There is a typo: 'The se wafers consisted' should be 'These wafers consisted'.
  3. [Reference [25]] The reference title contains a typo: 'coherernt' should be 'coherent'.
  4. [Fig. 5c] The assignment of the broad, lower-intensity peaks to the probe cavity's natural mechanical modes would be easier to evaluate if the probe cavity's own mode frequencies, or their offsets from f3 and f5, were stated explicitly.
  5. [Section D, Table I] The model sets N0 much higher than the instantaneous carrier density N, but the typical values of N in the SP regime are not given. Please state the expected range of N relative to N0 to justify the source approximation.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: central claim is experimental; model is a parameterized simulation with independently sourced parameters.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is an experimental demonstration of simultaneous high-amplitude mechanical oscillations of M3 and M5 under self-pulsing. The RF spectra, autocorrelation traces, phase-noise measurements, and the two-cavity probe data in Figures 2, 4, and 5 are direct observables, not outputs derived from the theoretical model. Equations (1)-(8) define a deterministic coupled ODE model whose parameters (Tables I and II) are stated to be extracted from experimental measurements and prior simulations; the MML state is obtained via numerical continuation and propagation as a nontrivial stable solution, not by fitting the model to the MML spectra or by defining it in terms of the target conclusion. Self-citations to Refs. [24], [25], and [29] supply background phenomenology of single-mode self-pulsing pumping and chaos; they are inputs, not the load-bearing proof of the MML result. The probe-cavity experiment assumes optical isolation between the two channels without a quantitative crosstalk measurement, but that is an experimental validity/instrumentation concern, not a circular derivation. No step in the paper equates an output to an input by construction, renames a fitted parameter as a prediction, or imports a uniqueness theorem from the authors' prior work to force the claimed regime.

Assumptions & free parameters 10 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The model rests on a set of independently characterized parameters and standard domain assumptions about carrier, thermal, and mechanical dynamics. No new physical entities are introduced. The main uncertainty is device-to-device transferability of parameters, which the paper does not quantify.

free parameters (10)
  • alpha_SPA = 40 s^-1
    Rate of free-carrier density increase per photon per intragap state; taken from prior characterization, not fitted to the multimode lasing data.
  • alpha_FC = 1.65e-14 K m^3 s^-1
    Temperature increase per photon per free-carrier density unit; from prior experiments.
  • N0 = 1e20 m^-3
    Density of intragap states; assumed much larger than excited carrier density, from prior device studies.
  • xi_T = 7.6 GHz/K
    Thermo-optic coefficient; from independent measurements.
  • xi_N = -3.5e-18 GHz m^3
    Free-carrier dispersion coefficient; from independent measurements.
  • Gamma_T = 1 MHz
    Thermal dissipation rate; value used in simulation, source not fully specified.
  • Gamma_FC = 2.2 GHz
    Free-carrier recombination rate; from prior work.
  • g_i/2pi = 150 kHz
    Vacuum optomechanical coupling rate for each mode; measured via frequency noise calibration.
  • m_eff = 2.4e-15 kg
    Effective mass from finite-element simulations.
  • Q = 500
    Mechanical quality factor from RF linewidth measurement at room pressure.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Intra-cavity photon number responds instantaneously to detuning (Eq. 2), justified by optical decay rate much larger than carrier, thermal, and mechanical rates.
    Used throughout the model; if invalid, the limit-cycle dynamics would differ.
  • domain assumption Free-carrier and temperature dynamics follow the two coupled ODEs in Eq. 3 with single-photon absorption as the generation mechanism.
    This is the standard model for self-pulsing in silicon cavities, supported by prior work.
  • domain assumption Mechanical modes are damped linear oscillators driven only by radiation pressure (Eq. 4).
    Neglects mechanical nonlinearities and other driving terms; reasonable at these amplitudes.
  • domain assumption The normalization assumes N0 >> N, so the intragap state density acts as an inexhaustible source.
    Statement in Appendix B; if violated, the carrier dynamics would saturate differently.
  • domain assumption All model parameters measured on similar devices in previous work apply to the present nanobeam.
    The paper extracts parameters from refs [23,33-36] and FEM; device-to-device variation is not quantified.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Self-modulated multimode silicon cavity optomechanics." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/SDX74RSY

@misc{pith2026250116914,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Self-modulated multimode silicon cavity optomechanics},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/SDX74RSY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.16914}
}
read the original abstract

Multimode cavity optomechanics, where multiple mechanical degrees of freedom couple to optical cavity modes, provides a rich platform for exploring nonlinear dynamics and engineering complex interactions. In this work, we investigate the interplay between two mechanical modes with similar characteristics and a self-induced nonlinear modulation of intra-cavity power (self-pulsing) driven by free-carrier dispersion and thermo-optic effects in silicon. Notably, the self-pulsing dynamics adapts to the optomechanically induced perturbations from both mechanical modes, enabling simultaneous synchronous pumping and driving them into a stable state characterized by high-amplitude, self-sustained, and coherent oscillations. This result effectively overcomes the strong mode competition typically observed in modes with similar spatial distributions and frequency scales. Remarkably, this regime is achieved even when the mechanical frequencies do not satisfy a harmonic relation, leading to quasi-periodic or chaotic intra-cavity power dynamics, while the mechanical modes maintain coherent, high-amplitude oscillations. These results, supported by a numerical model that accurately predicts the dynamics of the system, open new pathways for the generation and control of multi-phonon coherent sources in chip-integrated silicon platforms.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.16914 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1. Characterization and description of the optomechanical system. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2. Experimental measurements of multimode lasing dynamics. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Numerical simulations of the self-pulsing system coupled to two mechanical modes. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4. Experimental measurements of an OM nanobeam exhibiting periodic and quasi-periodic MML. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5. Experiment for probing the mechanical signal of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: a presents the temporal traces of the com￾puted state variables for a specific detuning where the system exhibits the quasi-periodic MML regime. Here, we observe the quasi-matching of 4 oscillations of M3 for every 9 oscillations of M5 within an SP quasi￾cycle defined …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7. Stationary and periodic orbits emerging from two Hopf bifurcations as a function of ∆ [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: FIG. 8. An experiment illustrating the chaotic and quasi-periodic MML regimes in a sample where the frequencies do not [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: FIG. 9. Mechanical probing measurements of an MML state involving more than two mechanical modes. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

44 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    For each region, a representative RF spectrum is extracted and plotted in Fig

    Several regions of interest beyond the threshold for mechanical lasing dynamics are highlighted and numbered from 0 to 4. For each region, a representative RF spectrum is extracted and plotted in Fig. 2b. Case 0 (Single-mode lasing of M 3): As the self- sustained limit cycle is created, it locks its repetition rate to f3. Under these conditions, M 3 is sy...

    work page

  2. [2]

    Key regimes are highlighted with double arrows and labeled ”R” for differentiation from Fig

    The sweep starts from a blue-detuned position. Key regimes are highlighted with double arrows and labeled ”R” for differentiation from Fig. 2. RF peaks corresponding to M3 and M5 are highlight with red and blue areas, respectively. b Visualization of the system dynamics during the detuning sweep in (a), represented as a Poincar´ e map. The dynamics are de...

    work page

  3. [3]

    b-c Magnified views around f3 and f5 throughout the detuning excursion in (a)

    Light and dark green dashed lines highlight the cases analyzed in subsequent panels. b-c Magnified views around f3 and f5 throughout the detuning excursion in (a). d RF spectrum corresponding to the periodic state highlighted in (a). A semitransparent area marks the RF tones associated to both mechanical modes: blue for M 3 and red for M 5. e-f Magnificat...

    work page

  4. [4]

    Stable solutions are represented by thick continuous lines, while unstable ones are depicted as thin dashed lines

    The maximum value of the normalized instantaneous amplitudes of the two mechanical modes are shown in blue (M 3) and red (M 5), respectively. Stable solutions are represented by thick continuous lines, while unstable ones are depicted as thin dashed lines. Period-doubling bifurcations (PD) are indicated by green dots. Branches with different periods are d...

    work page

  5. [5]

    b,c Extracted RF spectra from the quasi-periodic and chaotic MML regions shown in (a), respectively

    The quasi-periodic and chaotic MML regions are highlighted in green and dark green, respectively. b,c Extracted RF spectra from the quasi-periodic and chaotic MML regions shown in (a), respectively. FIG. 9. Mechanical probing measurements of an MML state involving more than two mechanical modes. a Contour plot of the RF spectra measured with the spectrum ...

    work page

  6. [6]

    b RF signal measured at the probing channel associated with the cavity receiving the mechanical perturbation

    The signal corresponds to the channel associated with the cavity exhibiting MML dynamics. b RF signal measured at the probing channel associated with the cavity receiving the mechanical perturbation. Only the spectrum corresponding to the three-mode lasing operation is shown. Peaks corresponding to the transduction of thermally activated mechanical modes ...

    work page

  7. [7]

    Aspelmeyer, T

    M. Aspelmeyer, T. J. Kippenberg, and F. Marquardt, Cavity optomechanics, Rev. Mod. Phys. 86, 1391 (2014)

    2014

  8. [8]

    Barzanjeh, A

    S. Barzanjeh, A. Xuereb, S. Gr¨ oblacher, M. Paternostro, C. A. Regal, and E. M. Weig, Optomechanics for quan- tum technologies, Nat. Phys. 18, 15 (2022)

    2022

Show all 44 references
  1. [9]

    Metcalfe, Applications of cavity optomechanics, Ap- plied Physics Reviews 1, 031105 (2014)

    M. Metcalfe, Applications of cavity optomechanics, Ap- plied Physics Reviews 1, 031105 (2014)

    2014

  2. [10]

    B.-B. Li, L. Ou, Y. Lei, and Y.-C. Liu, Cavity optome- chanical sensing, Nanophotonics 10, 2799 (2021)

    2021

  3. [11]

    T.J.Kippenberg and K.J.Vahala, Cavity optomechanics: Back-action at the mesoscale, Science 321, 1172 (2008)

    2008

  4. [12]

    Kuang, R

    T. Kuang, R. Huang, W. Xiong, Y. Zuo, X. Han, F. Nori, C.-W. Qiu, H. Luo, H. Jing, and G. Xiao, Nonlinear multi-frequency phonon lasers with active levitated op- tomechanics, Nat. phys. 19, 414 (2023)

    2023

  5. [13]

    M.-A. Miri, G. D’Aguanno, and A. Al` u, Optomechani- cal frequency combs, New Journal of Physics 20, 043013 (2018)

    2018

  6. [14]

    F. Liu, S. Alaie, Z. C. Leseman, and M. Hossein-Zadeh, Sub-pg mass sensing and measurement with an optome- chanical oscillator, Opt. Express 21, 19555 (2013)

    2013

  7. [15]

    Hossein-Zadeh and K

    M. Hossein-Zadeh and K. Vahala, Photonic rf down- converter based on optomechanical oscillation, IEEE Photonics Technology Letters 20, 234 (2008)

    2008

  8. [16]

    Mercad´ e, M

    L. Mercad´ e, M. Morant, A. Griol, R. Lorente, and A. Mart ´ ınez, Photonic frequency conversion of ofdm mi- crowave signals in a wavelength-scale optomechanical cavity, Laser Photon Rev 15, 2100175 (2021)

    2021

  9. [17]

    J. P. Mathew, J. del Pino, and E. Verhagen, Syn- thetic gauge fields for phonon transport in a nano- optomechanical system, Nat. Nano. 15, 198 (2020)

    2020

  10. [18]

    J. J. Slim, C. C. Wanjura, M. Brunelli, J. del Pino, A. Nunnenkamp, and E. Verhagen, Optomechanical re- alization of the bosonic kitaev chain, Nature 627, 767 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Bemani, A

    F. Bemani, A. Motazedifard, R. Roknizadeh, M. H. Naderi, and D. Vitali, Synchronization dynamics of two nanomechanical membranes within a fabry-perot cavity, Phys. Rev. A 96, 023805 (2017)

    2017

  12. [20]

    Sheng, X

    J. Sheng, X. Wei, C. Yang, and H. Wu, Self-organized synchronization of phonon lasers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 053604 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    Djorwe, Y

    P. Djorwe, Y. Pennec, and B. Djafari-Rouhani, Fre- quency locking and controllable chaos through excep- tional points in optomechanics, Phys. Rev. E 98, 032201 (2018)

    2018

  14. [23]

    Kemiktarak, M

    U. Kemiktarak, M. Durand, M. Metcalfe, and J. Lawall, Mode competition and anomalous cooling in a multimode phonon laser, Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 030802 (2014)

    2014

  15. [24]

    R. C. Ng, P. Nizet, D. Navarro-Urrios, G. Arregui, M. Al- brechtsen, P. D. Garc ´ ıa, S. Stobbe, C. M. Sotomayor- Torres, and G. Madiot, Intermodulation of optical fre- quency combs in a multimode optomechanical system, Phys. Rev. Res. 5, L032028 (2023)

    2023

  16. [25]

    Y. Wang, M. Zhang, Z. Shen, G.-T. Xu, R. Niu, F.- W. Sun, G.-C. Guo, and C.-H. Dong, Optomechanical frequency comb based on multiple nonlinear dynamics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 163603 (2024)

    2024

  17. [26]

    Mercad´ e, K

    L. Mercad´ e, K. Pelka, R. Burgwal, A. Xuereb, A. Mart ´ ınez, and E. Verhagen, Floquet phonon lasing in multimode optomechanical systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 127, 073601 (2021)

    2021

  18. [27]

    Madiot, M

    G. Madiot, M. Albrechtsen, S. Stobbe, C. M. Sotomayor- Torres, and G. Arregui, Multimode optomechanics with a two-dimensional optomechanical crystal, APL Photonics 8, 116107 (2023). 16

    2023

  19. [28]

    Pelka, G

    K. Pelka, G. Madiot, R. Braive, and A. Xuereb, Floquet control of optomechanical bistability in multimode sys- tems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 129, 123603 (2022)

    2022

  20. [29]

    T. J. Johnson, M. Borselli, and O. Painter, Self-induced optical modulation of the transmission through a high- q silicon microdisk resonator, Optics express 14, 817 (2006)

    2006

  21. [30]

    Navarro-Urrios, G

    D. Navarro-Urrios, G. Arregui, M. F. Colombano, and et al, Giant injection-locking bandwidth of a self-pulsing limit-cycle in an optomechanical cavity, Commun. Phys 5, 330 (2022)

    2022

  22. [31]

    Navarro-Urrios, N

    D. Navarro-Urrios, N. Capuj, J. Gomis-Bresco, and et al., A self-stabilized coherernt phonon source driven by opti- cal forces, Sci. Rep. 5, 15733 (2015)

    2015

  23. [32]

    L. Ding, C. Belacel, S. Ducci, G. Leo, and I. Fabero, Ultralow loss single-mode silica tapers manufactured by a microheater, Appl. Opt. 49, 2441 (2010)

    2010

  24. [33]

    Eichenfield, J

    M. Eichenfield, J. Chan, R. M. Camacho, K. J. Vahala, and O. Painter, Optomechanical crystals, Nature 462, 78 (2009)

    2009

  25. [34]

    Ke¸ skekler, H

    A. Ke¸ skekler, H. Arjmandi-Tash, P. G. Steeneken, and F. Alijani, Symmetry-breaking-induced frequency combs in graphene resonators, Nano Letters 22, 6048 (2022)

    2022

  26. [35]

    Navarro-Urrios, N

    D. Navarro-Urrios, N. E. Capuj, M. F. Colombano, P. D. Garc ´ ıa, M. Sledzinska, F. Alzina, A. Griol, A. Mart ´ ınez, and C. M. Sotomayor-Torres, Nonlinear dynamics and chaos in an optomechanical beam, Nature communica- tions 8, 14965 (2017)

    2017

  27. [36]

    Arregui, M

    G. Arregui, M. F. Colombano, J. Maire, A. Pitanti, N. Capuj, A. Griol, A. Mart ´ ınez, C. M. Sotomayor- Torres, and D. Navarro-Urrios, Injection locking in an optomechanical coherent phonon source, Nanophotonics 10, 1319 (2021)

    2021

  28. [37]

    Z. Li, M. Xu, R. A. Norte, A. M. Arag´ on, P. G. Steeneken, and F. Alijani, Strain engineering of nonlinear nanoresonators from hardening to softening, Communi- cations Physics 7, 53 (2024)

    2024

  29. [38]

    Gomis-Bresco, D

    J. Gomis-Bresco, D. Navarro-Urrios, M. Oudich, S. El- Jallal, A. Griol, D. Puerto, E. Chavez, Y. Pennec, B. Djafari-Rouhani, F. Alzina, et al. , A one-dimensional optomechanical crystal with a complete phononic band gap, Nature communications 5, 4452 (2014)

    2014

  30. [39]

    Navarro-Urrios, M

    D. Navarro-Urrios, M. F. Colombano, J. Maire, E. Ch´ avez-´Angel, G. Arregui, N. E. Capuj, A. De- vos, A. Griol, L. Bellieres, A. Mart ´ ınez, K. Grig- oras, T. H¨ akkinen, J. Saarilahti, T. Makkonen, C. M. Sotomayor-Torres, and J. Ahopelto, Proper- ties of nanocrystalline sil...

    2020

  31. [40]

    Maire, E

    J. Maire, E. Ch´ avez-´Angel, G. Arregui, M. F. Colom- bano, N. E. Capuj, A. Griol, A. Mart ´ ınez, D. Navarro- Urrios, J. Ahopelto, and C. M. Sotomayor-Torres, Ther- mal properties of nanocrystalline silicon nanobeams, Ad- vanced Functional Materials 32, 2105767 (2022)

    2022

  32. [41]

    Navarro-Urrios, N

    D. Navarro-Urrios, N. Capuj, J. Maire, M. Colombano, J. Jaramillo-Fernandez, E. Chavez-Angel, L. L. Martin, L. Mercad´ e, A. Griol, A. Mart ´ ınez, C. M. Sotomayor- Torres, and J. Ahopelto, Nanocrystalline silicon optome- chanical cavities, Opt. Express 26, 9829 (2018)

    2018

  33. [42]

    M. L. Gorodetksy, A. Schliesser, G. Anetsberger, S. Deleglise, and T. J. Kippenberg, Determination of the vacuum optomechanical coupling rate using frequency noise calibration, Opt. Express 18, 23236 (2010)

    2010

  34. [43]

    E. J. Doedel et al., AUTO: Software for Continuation and Bifurcation Problems in Ordinary Differential Equations

  35. [44]

    Y. A. Kuznetsov, Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory (Springer, 2023)

    2023

  36. [45]

    Zhang, T

    X. Zhang, T. Lin, F. Tian, H. Du, Y. Zou, F. S. Chau, and G. Zhou, Mode competition and hopping in optome- chanical nano-oscillators, Applied Physics Letters 112, 153502 (2018)

    2018

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.