SU(6) model revisited

Hiroki Wada; Tatsuya Yamaoka; Tetsuya Onogi

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

SU(6) model revisited

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-10 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read The paper claims that in the SU(6) chiral gauge theory, a single composite scalar field taking values in Z3 reproduces the mixed 't Hooft anomaly, predicting a threefold vacuum degeneracy.

desk verdict Clean mixed-anomaly matching and a cross-checked pure [Z6]^3 anomaly; the three-fold vacuum claim is a clearly-labeled conjecture, not a proof. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.18165 v1 pith:5BQ76CYB submitted 2025-01-30 hep-lat

Tetsuya Onogi , Hiroki Wada , Tatsuya Yamaoka This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-lat

keywords SU(6)chiralgaugetheory'tHooftanomalymatchingStora-ZuminoprocedureWess-Zumino-Wittenactiondiscretesymmetrycentervacuumstructurelattice

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper studies the vacuum structure of the SU(6) chiral gauge theory by asking which low-energy degrees of freedom can reproduce the theory's quantum anomalies. Using the Stora-Zumino procedure, it identifies all 't Hooft anomalies of the UV theory, and using Wess-Zumino-Witten logic it builds an effective action around a single composite scalar field. The central result is that this scalar, taking values in Z3, matches the mixed anomaly between the discrete chiral symmetry Z6 and the 1-form center symmetry Z3, implying the chiral symmetry breaks as Z6 to Z2 with three vacua. The pure chiral self-anomaly is also computed and agrees with an independent eta-invariant calculation, but its infrared matching is left unresolved; the authors conjecture it may be reproduced by the same Z3 scalar if the relevant topological term takes a Chern-Simons-like form.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing objects are the 6D anomaly polynomial and the resulting 5D SPT action computed by the Stora-Zumino descent procedure, which encode the mixed anomaly [Z6^(0)] - [Z3^(1)]^2 and the pure chiral anomaly [Z6^(0)]^3. The second piece is the Wess-Zumino-Witten dressing trick: replace bare gauge fields by gauge fields shifted by a field Phi = phi/p, where phi has charge p under Z6 and Phi shifts by 2 pi / 6, so that the shifted Chern-Simons form of the dressed fields is gauge invariant. The resulting effective action contains a coupling between phi and a 3-form field whose Lagrange-multiplier term restricts phi to Z3 and reproduces the mixed anomaly. For the self-anomaly, the relevant known object is the Wan-Wang cochain eta_chiral built with Bockstein maps, which is well defined but currently lacks a compensating 4D local term.

What would settle it

Compute, on the lattice or in a controlled model, the spectrum and vacuum degeneracy of SU(6) in the confined phase: if the theory is gapped but the vacua are not threefold degenerate, or if the order parameter transforming under Z6 is not a single scalar, the mixed-anomaly matching by a Z3-valued scalar is falsified. A second check is to derive the 4D term that cancels the Wan-Wang cochain anomaly: if the required term cannot be expressed as a Chern-Simons-like functional of the same scalar field, the claim that a single Z3 scalar captures all anomalies is false.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On its own terms, the discovery is that the IR effective theory for the mixed anomaly needs only one scalar order parameter, not a full Goldstone multiplet. The authors assume confinement and a gapped spectrum, so the discrete chiral symmetry must break spontaneously, yet the usual fermion bilinear expectation value vanishes by Fermi statistics. They therefore posit a composite scalar field of charge p under the Z6 chiral symmetry, form the dressed field obtained by dividing by p, and construct an action whose Wess-Zumino-Witten-type topological terms exactly reproduce the mixed anomaly [Z6^(0)] - [Z3^(1)]^2. A Lagrange-multiplier term in the action forces the scalar to live in Z3, giving three degenerate vacua. For the pure discrete chiral anomaly [Z6^(0)]^3, the Stora-Zumino result, valued in 1 mod 9, agrees with the eta-invariant computation, but the authors find no four-dimensional term that compensates the cochain topological term proposed for this anomaly, and they state that matching it remains ongoing work.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that a single composite scalar field carries the order parameter in the infrared, and, for the full picture, that the pure chiral self-anomaly can be written in a Chern-Simons-like form; if either fails, the Z3 scalar description collapses.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The vacuum of the confined SU(6) model is threefold degenerate, with chiral symmetry broken from Z6 to Z2.
The order parameter cannot be the fermion bilinear, since its expectation value vanishes; it must be a composite such as a four-fermion operator.
A single scalar field in Z3 is sufficient at low energy to reproduce the mixed 't Hooft anomaly.
If the self-anomaly is also matched by the same field, the entire infrared theory reduces to one scalar with three vacua.
A lattice realization of SU(6) should look for this Z3 scalar order parameter and the associated threefold degeneracy.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A direct test of the paper's conjecture would be to construct the 4D local term that cancels the Wan-Wang cochain anomaly; if it depends only on the same scalar field, the one-field description is complete, whereas if it requires domain-wall or boundary degrees of freedom, the vacuum structure is richer than Z3.
The argument appears special to N=6, since the equality of N-ality 3 and the triviality of the Z2 factor are what allow a single scalar to carry all anomalies; for general even N one might expect several order parameters or higher-form fields.
If the one-scalar picture is correct, the spontaneous breaking of Z6 on the lattice should be visible through a nonzero expectation value of a gauge-invariant four-fermion operator, which is a concrete observable to measure.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Read this if you are working on lattice chiral gauge theory or on anomaly matching for the SU(6) model. It is a proceedings-style progress report, and it is honest about what it settles and what it leaves open. The genuinely new piece is the pure discrete chiral anomaly [Z6]^3: the authors compute it via Stora-Zumino, get a value of 1 mod 9, and cross-check it against the eta-invariant formula from Hsieh and from Garcia-Etxebarria-Montero. That agreement is the most solid part of the paper. They also write an explicit WZW-style IR action (Eq. 16) whose single Z3 scalar reproduces the mixed anomaly [Z6^(0)] - [Z3^(1)]^2. The construction is a consistency check rather than a prediction, but it is clean and the paper itself says so.

The soft spots are real but mostly acknowledged. The Stora-Zumino derivation of the anomaly polynomials is stated, not shown. The existence of the composite scalar order parameter is assumed, not derived. And the pure self-anomaly matching is left open: Sec. 4.2 calls it ongoing work, and the Summary says the vacuum structure 'may be fully constructed' using φ. So the stress-test note lands: the broad three-fold vacuum claim is a conjecture pending the self-anomaly computation. That conjecture is clearly labeled, so the paper does not overclaim. The narrow mixed-anomaly statement is defensible as written.

Minor issues: a few typos ('neгрект' appears in a footnote, and 'This is my ongoing work' reads oddly), but nothing load-bearing. The citation pattern is appropriate; the relevant prior work by Yamaguchi, Bolognesi-Konishi-Luzio, and the eta-invariant literature is cited.

Who this is for: lattice people working on the SU(6) model or on WZW matching for discrete anomalies. If that is your area, it deserves a serious referee. If you are outside the subfield, it is a short note you can skim in ten minutes. My recommendation: engage with the mixed-anomaly part as the main result and treat the self-anomaly discussion as a clearly-flagged conjecture. For peer review, I would send it out rather than desk reject—the cross-checked pure anomaly is a genuine data point—but the final version should keep the proven/conjectural distinction sharp.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper revisits the SU(6) chiral gauge theory with a Weyl fermion in the self-conjugate antisymmetric representation. Using the Stora-Zumino descent formalism, the authors identify two 't Hooft anomalies: a mixed anomaly between the Z6 discrete chiral symmetry and the Z3 1-form center symmetry, [Z6^(0)]-[Z3^(1)]^2, and a pure discrete chiral anomaly [Z6^(0)]^3. They verify the pure anomaly against a Dai-Freed/eta-invariant computation from Refs. [9,10]. They then construct an IR effective action, in the WZW spirit, with a single composite scalar field that reproduces the mixed anomaly, and argue that this implies a three-fold degenerate vacuum. The matching of the pure chiral anomaly by the same scalar is left as an open problem, explicitly described as ongoing work.

Significance. The paper's positive result, if correct, is a clean example of anomaly matching with a generalized symmetry forcing a nontrivial vacuum structure in a theory without a fermion bilinear condensate. The cross-check between the Stora-Zumino and eta-invariant computations for the pure chiral anomaly is a valuable consistency check, and the paper is honest about its limitations: the mixed-anomaly matching is explicitly conditional on the existence of a composite scalar order parameter, and the pure chiral anomaly is not matched. The main weakness is that the advertised conclusion, that the full vacuum structure is captured by a Z3-valued scalar, remains a conjecture. For the journal's readership, the paper would be strengthened by a fuller derivation of the anomaly polynomials and a sharper separation of established results from conjectures.

major comments (3)

[Section 4.1, eqs. (14)-(16)] The entire matching construction rests on the assumption that a composite scalar field phi with an arbitrary charge p under Z6 exists. No microscopic derivation or lattice evidence for such an order parameter is provided, and p is a free parameter. As written, the abstract's claim that the mixed anomaly is reproduced by a 'Z3-valued scalar field' is therefore conditional: the field Phi = phi/p transforms by +2pi/6 in eq. (15), and the relation between this construction and a Z3-valued field is not explained. The result should be stated as conditional, or the order parameter should be derived.
[Section 4.2] The pure discrete chiral anomaly [Z6^(0)]^3 is not matched by any four-dimensional degree of freedom. The text states 'this is my ongoing work' and 'the associated four-dimensional degrees of freedom remain unclear.' The only supporting argument for the conjecture that the topological term is Chern-Simons-like is 'very naive' and cites Refs. [15,16] without a direct calculation. Consequently, the Sec. 5 statement that the vacuum structure 'may be fully constructed using phi in Z3' is not supported by the analysis. The paper should present this as a conjecture in an Outlook section rather than as a conclusion.
[Section 3.1, eqs. (8)-(12)] The derivation of the Stora-Zumino anomaly polynomials is not shown. In particular, the step from the 6d anomaly polynomial (8) to the 5d SPT action (9), the chiral variation (10), and the use of the constraint tr(Ftilde - B^(2)) = 0 in the second line of (10) are asserted without explanation. Since the identification of the anomalies is the foundation for the subsequent effective-field-theory construction, the authors should provide the derivation or a precise reference to a source that presents it for this specific model.

minor comments (5)

[Section 2.2, eq. (6)] The notation 'Z_6/3 = 2' is ambiguous; Z_6/Z_3 has order 2, whereas the three-fold vacuum degeneracy corresponds to the quotient Z_6/Z_2 isomorphic to Z_3. The text should be rephrased to avoid this confusion.
[Introduction and Abstract] The Introduction states 'our claim that ... all the anomalies in this model are captured by only one scalar field in the IR region,' while the abstract and Sec. 4.2 say the pure chiral anomaly remains unresolved. These statements should be made consistent.
[Throughout] There are numerous typographical and unicode errors in the equations (for example, '/u1D441', '/u1D459', '/u1D434' in the arXiv version), which make the paper difficult to read; the manuscript should be carefully proofread.
[Appendix A] The statement 'the cohomology of Z2 is trivial' is imprecise; what matters is the cancellation of the 2-form background field through the 1-form gauge transformation in eqs. (21)-(24). The appendix should clarify this point.
[Section 3.2] Eq. (13) gives the general formula for A[Z_B^(0)]^3, but the application to the SU(6) model is not shown; a few lines showing the charges q_i and the resulting value 1 mod 9 would help the reader verify the claim.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

Mixed-anomaly effective action is constructed to reproduce the anomaly, making that specific 'demonstration' a by-construction consistency check; anomaly computations are independently cross-checked and the pure chiral self-anomaly is explicitly left as ongoing work.

self definitional [Sec. 4.1, Eq. (16) (effective IR action) and Eq. (15) (scalar transformation); abstract.]
"From this view point, let us assume that there exists the composite scalar field φ with charge p under the Z6 transformation, which satisfies (15). Then, we can construct the chiral invariant action, which corresponds to the shifted CS term ... with Φ ... Therefore the effective IR action is ... Note that we can construct the effective action by just one scalar field which reproduce the mixed 't Hooft anomaly (11) in the UV energy scale."

The scalar transformation (15) and the WZW-type coupling in Eq. (16) are chosen precisely so that the chiral variation of the effective action yields the mixed anomaly (11). The statement that a low-energy effective theory described by a Z3-valued scalar reproduces the mixed anomaly is therefore a consistency check of the assumed scalar field, not an independent prediction: the anomaly was an input to the construction, and the scalar's existence is introduced as an assumption ('let us assume').

full rationale

No load-bearing circularity is found. The UV anomaly computations are independent: the Stora-Zumino result for the pure discrete chiral anomaly is cross-checked against the eta-invariant formula of Refs. [9,10], and the paper records agreement (Sec. 3.2). No parameter is fitted to data, and the authors do not cite their own work for any load-bearing uniqueness claim. The only by-construction element is the effective action of Sec. 4.1, which is engineered to reproduce the mixed anomaly; the abstract's 'demonstration' is an existence/consistency statement conditional on the assumed composite scalar, and the paper says so explicitly. The three-fold vacuum conclusion follows from the anomaly-forced breaking Z6 -> Z2 (Eq. 6), not from the scalar action. The pure chiral self-anomaly is honestly reported as ongoing work: the Stora-Zumino topological term is called 'ill-defined mathematically', the well-defined cochain form (17) is quoted from Wan-Wang, and the compensating 4-dimensional degrees of freedom are not found; the 'similar to CS term' possibility is labeled 'very naive' and rests on independent references [15,16]. Thus the broad claim is a clearly labeled conjecture, not a circular derivation. Score 2 reflects only the minor built-in consistency of the mixed-anomaly effective action.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 2 invented entities

The analysis leans on standard anomaly-descent mathematics and on domain assumptions (confinement, gapped phase, scalar order parameter). It introduces one ad hoc low-energy field, the Z3 scalar, and one speculative assumption about the CS-like form of the pure anomaly.

free parameters (1)

p (charge of composite scalar under Z6) = unspecified
Introduced in Sec. 4.1 as the charge of φ; it cancels from the physical action (eq. 14), so it does not affect the anomaly matching but is a manually introduced integer.

assumptions (6)

standard math Stora-Zumino descent for anomaly polynomials
The paper relies on the standard descent equations (Refs. [7,8]) to extract the 5d SPT action from the 6d anomaly polynomial; the specific SU(6) evaluation is stated without full derivation.
domain assumption Confinement and absence of an IR CFT
Sec. 4 states 'let us assume' the system is in a confinement phase and is not constructed by CFT; this is needed to infer spontaneous chiral symmetry breaking from the mixed anomaly.
domain assumption Gapped phase guarantees SSB via the mixed anomaly
The paper invokes Refs. [5,6] for anomaly obstructions to symmetry-preserving gapped phases, which is an unproved background result for the SU(6) model.
ad hoc to paper Composite scalar order parameter exists
Sec. 4.1 assumes a composite scalar field φ with charge p under Z6 exists, whose expectation value breaks the chiral symmetry; no independent derivation of its existence is given.
ad hoc to paper Pure chiral anomaly topological term is Chern-Simons-like
Sec. 4.2 speculates that the self-anomaly might be matched by the same scalar if the topological term takes a CS-like form; this is acknowledged as a 'very naive discussion'.
domain assumption Z2 redundancy in the total symmetry group is removable
Appendix A argues the Z2 2-form background gauge field can be removed by a 1-form gauge transformation; this is load-bearing for the anomaly classification and is presented as rigorous without addressing general topology.

invented entities (2)

Composite scalar field φ (Z3-valued)
purpose: Order parameter for chiral symmetry breaking in the IR, constructed to match the mixed anomaly in the effective action (eq. 16)
The paper assumes its existence without independent evidence such as a lattice signal or a proof from the UV theory; it is an ad hoc low-energy degree of freedom.
Possible domain-wall degrees of freedom
purpose: Alternative mechanism for matching the pure chiral self-anomaly if the scalar field cannot do it
Mentioned in Sec. 4.2 as one possibility, with no concrete construction or observable signature.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of SU(6) model revisited." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/5BQ76CYB

@misc{pith2026250118165,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: SU(6) model revisited},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/5BQ76CYB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.18165}
}

read the original abstract

We discuss the vacuum structure of the SU(6) model, a chiral gauge theory, from the perspective of anomaly matching. To this end, we first identify all possible 't Hooft anomalies in the UV theory using the Stora-Zumino procedure. Subsequently, we construct an effective theory by applying the idea of the Wess-Zumino-Witten action to derive the topological terms that encode the 't Hooft anomalies. As a result, we demonstrate that a low-energy effective theory reproducing one of the anomalies, namely the mixed anomaly, is described by a Z3-valued scalar field. On the other hand, the effective theory that accounts for the discrete chiral self-anomaly is significantly more intricate, and elucidating its structure remains an ongoing challenge.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

Perusing confining pseudoreal theories: a story of emerging massless spin-1 bosons
hep-th 2026-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

Confining pseudoreal gauge theories leave free massless spin-1 composites in the IR—one for almost all one-species models, two plus an NGB for the only confining two-species model.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

16 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[1]

’t Hooft anomaly matching condition and c hiral symmetry breaking without bilinear condensate,

S. Y amaguchi, “’t Hooft anomaly matching condition and c hiral symmetry breaking without bilinear condensate,” JHEP 01 (2019) 014, 1811./zero.alt3939/zero.alt3

work page 2019
[2]

Gauging 1-form c enter symmetries in simple /u1D446/u1D448(/u1D441) gauge theories,

S. Bolognesi, K. Konishi, and A. Luzio, “Gauging 1-form c enter symmetries in simple /u1D446/u1D448(/u1D441) gauge theories,” JHEP 01 (2020) 048, 19/zero.alt39./zero.alt36598

work page 2020
[3]

Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontan eous chiral symmetry breaking,

G. ’t Hooft, “Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontan eous chiral symmetry breaking,” NATO Sci. Ser. B 59 (1980) 135–157

work page 1980
[4]

Anomaly constraint on massless QCD and the role of Skyrmions in chiral symmetry breaking,

Y . Tanizaki, “Anomaly constraint on massless QCD and the role of Skyrmions in chiral symmetry breaking,” JHEP 08 (2018) 171, 18/zero.alt37./zero.alt37666

work page 2018
[5]

Anomaly Obstructions to Symme try Preserving Gapped Phases,

C. Córdova and K. Ohmori, “Anomaly Obstructions to Symme try Preserving Gapped Phases,” 191/zero.alt3./zero.alt34962

work page
[6]

Anomaly Constraints on Gapped Phases with Discrete Chiral Symmetry,

C. Córdova and K. Ohmori, “Anomaly Constraints on Gapped Phases with Discrete Chiral Symmetry,” Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020), no. 2, 025011, 1912.13/zero.alt369

work page 2020
[7]

Algebraic Study of Chi ral Anomalies,

J. Manes, R. Stora, and B. Zumino, “Algebraic Study of Chi ral Anomalies,” Commun. Math. Phys. 102 (1985) 157

work page 1985
[8]

CHIRAL ANOMALIES AND DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY : LECTURES GIVEN AT LES HOUCHES, AUGUST 1983,

B. Zumino, “CHIRAL ANOMALIES AND DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY : LECTURES GIVEN AT LES HOUCHES, AUGUST 1983,” in Les Houches Summer School on Theoretical Physics: Relativi ty, Groups and Topology, pp. 1291–1322. 10, 1983

work page 1983

Show all 16 references

[9]

Discrete gauge anomalies revisited,

C.-T. Hsieh, “Discrete gauge anomalies revisited,” 18/zero.alt38./zero.alt32881
[10]

Dai-Freed ano malies in particle physics,

I. n. García-Etxebarria and M. Montero, “Dai-Freed ano malies in particle physics,” JHEP 08 (2019) 003, 18/zero.alt38./zero.alt3/zero.alt3/zero.alt3/zero.alt39. 8 SU(6) model revisited

2019
[11]

An SU(2) Anomaly,

E. Witten, “An SU(2) Anomaly,” Phys. Lett. B 117 (1982) 324–328

1982
[12]

Deconﬁnement on axion domai n walls,

M. M. Anber and E. Poppitz, “Deconﬁnement on axion domai n walls,” JHEP 03 (2020) 124, 2/zero.alt3/zero.alt31./zero.alt33631

2020
[13]

New anomalies, TQFTs, a nd conﬁnement in bosonic chiral gauge theories,

M. M. Anber, S. Hong, and M. Son, “New anomalies, TQFTs, a nd conﬁnement in bosonic chiral gauge theories,” JHEP 02 (2022) 062, 21/zero.alt39./zero.alt33245

2022
[14]

Wan and J

Z. Wan and J. Wang, “Higher anomalies, higher symmetrie s, and cobordisms I: classiﬁcation of higher-symmetry-protected topological states and thei r boundary fermionic/bosonic anomalies via a generalized cobordism theory,” Ann. Math. Sci. Appl. 4 (2019), no. 2, 107–311, 1812.11967

2019 arXiv
[15]

Anomalies and symmetry fractionalization,

D. G. Delmastro, J. Gomis, P.-S. Hsin, and Z. Komargodsk i, “Anomalies and symmetry fractionalization,” SciPost Phys. 15 (2023), no. 3, 079, 22/zero.alt36.15118

2023
[16]

Symmetry TFTs and anomalies of non-invertible symmetries,

J. Kaidi, E. Nardoni, G. Zafrir, and Y . Zheng, “Symmetry TFTs and anomalies of non-invertible symmetries,” JHEP 10 (2023) 053, 23/zero.alt31./zero.alt37112. 9

2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 10, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

’t Hooft anomaly matching condition and c hiral symmetry breaking without bilinear condensate,

S. Y amaguchi, “’t Hooft anomaly matching condition and c hiral symmetry breaking without bilinear condensate,” JHEP 01 (2019) 014, 1811./zero.alt3939/zero.alt3

work page 2019

[2] [2]

Gauging 1-form c enter symmetries in simple /u1D446/u1D448(/u1D441) gauge theories,

S. Bolognesi, K. Konishi, and A. Luzio, “Gauging 1-form c enter symmetries in simple /u1D446/u1D448(/u1D441) gauge theories,” JHEP 01 (2020) 048, 19/zero.alt39./zero.alt36598

work page 2020

[3] [3]

Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontan eous chiral symmetry breaking,

G. ’t Hooft, “Naturalness, chiral symmetry, and spontan eous chiral symmetry breaking,” NATO Sci. Ser. B 59 (1980) 135–157

work page 1980

[4] [4]

Anomaly constraint on massless QCD and the role of Skyrmions in chiral symmetry breaking,

Y . Tanizaki, “Anomaly constraint on massless QCD and the role of Skyrmions in chiral symmetry breaking,” JHEP 08 (2018) 171, 18/zero.alt37./zero.alt37666

work page 2018

[5] [5]

Anomaly Obstructions to Symme try Preserving Gapped Phases,

C. Córdova and K. Ohmori, “Anomaly Obstructions to Symme try Preserving Gapped Phases,” 191/zero.alt3./zero.alt34962

work page

[6] [6]

Anomaly Constraints on Gapped Phases with Discrete Chiral Symmetry,

C. Córdova and K. Ohmori, “Anomaly Constraints on Gapped Phases with Discrete Chiral Symmetry,” Phys. Rev. D 102 (2020), no. 2, 025011, 1912.13/zero.alt369

work page 2020

[7] [7]

Algebraic Study of Chi ral Anomalies,

J. Manes, R. Stora, and B. Zumino, “Algebraic Study of Chi ral Anomalies,” Commun. Math. Phys. 102 (1985) 157

work page 1985

[8] [8]

CHIRAL ANOMALIES AND DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY : LECTURES GIVEN AT LES HOUCHES, AUGUST 1983,

B. Zumino, “CHIRAL ANOMALIES AND DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY : LECTURES GIVEN AT LES HOUCHES, AUGUST 1983,” in Les Houches Summer School on Theoretical Physics: Relativi ty, Groups and Topology, pp. 1291–1322. 10, 1983

work page 1983