Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 33 references

New compact ion source design and implementation for low current applications

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A compact ECR ion source built from standard vacuum parts and commercial RF components produces a low-emittance, low-current proton beam for medical and industrial use.

desk verdict A genuinely useful compact ECR source built from off-the-shelf parts, but the 'proton beam' label outruns the charge-blind measurements. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.18992 v1 pith:Q2PQJJM5 submitted 2025-01-31 physics.acc-ph hep-ex

Jorge Feuchtwanger , Victor Etxebarria , Joaquín Portilla , Josu Jugo , Inari Badillo , Iñigo Arredondo This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.acc-phhep-ex PACS 07.77.Ka74.25.nd52.50.Qt
keywords ionsourceselectroncyclotronresonancecompactECRsourcelow-currentbeamspermanentmagnetHalbacharraybeamemittancepepperpotmeasurementoff-the-shelfcomponents
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports the design, assembly, and first beam tests of a compact electron cyclotron resonance (ECR) ion source built almost entirely from standard vacuum components and commercially available RF and magnet parts. The authors aim to show that a low-current, low-energy ion source does not need bulky custom hardware: permanent magnets generate the resonance field, a simple in-chamber antenna couples 3 GHz power, and a tetrode extractor focuses the beam. On a 6 keV beam they measure a total current of 4.3 µA, a spot under 20 mm, and horizontal and vertical emittances of 0.065 and 0.031 π mm mrad. If these results hold, a compact, low-power source suitable for biomedical and industrial low-current applications can be assembled at modest cost with mostly off-the-shelf parts.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is electron cyclotron resonance: an electron in a magnetic field $B$ resonates with microwaves of frequency $f$ when $B = 2\pi f m/e$, about 110 mT for 3 GHz, and the resonant electrons ionize the feed gas. The design realizes this with a Halbach array of eight permanent magnet bars around a DN 63 CF vacuum chamber that acts as a circular-waveguide resonator, an antenna coupler that presses onto the RF feedthrough center pin to excite the TE111 mode, and a tetrode extraction system whose first electrode doubles as the magnetic flux closer. An Einzel lens focuses the beam, and a pepperpot measurement following a standard procedure converts beamlet positions and divergences into the quoted emittance values.

What would settle it

Run the source on hydrogen at 6 keV and send the extracted beam through a magnetic spectrometer or time-of-flight mass analyzer; if H2+ or H3+ carry a substantial share of the measured current, the claim that this is a proton beam for low-current applications is not established.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a fully functional off-resonance ECR ion source for low-current applications can be made compact and low-cost by using standard CF vacuum components for the chamber and isolators, a Halbach array of eight permanent magnet bars for the roughly 110 mT field, a press-fit antenna coupler that excites the TE111 cavity mode at 3 GHz, and an all-coaxial RF chain with a solid-state amplifier. Beam tests at 6 keV give a total current of 4.3 µA, a Gaussian spot smaller than 20 mm, and pepperpot emittances of 0.065 π mm mrad horizontal and 0.031 π mm mrad vertical, which the authors take as evidence the beam is suitable for medical and industrial applications requiring low currents. The paper also reports that air cooling keeps the N50 FeNdB magnets below their 80 °C demagnetization limit at RF powers up to 100 W, so no ancillary supplies on the high-voltage end are needed.

Load-bearing premise

The beam is assumed to be pure H+ protons, but the tests measured only total current, spot size, and emittance, with no mass-to-charge analysis to rule out H2+ or H3+ contributions; if molecular ions are present, the quoted current and emittance are properties of a mixed beam rather than a proton beam.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Low-current ion sources for biomedical and industrial settings can be reproduced from standard vacuum hardware and commercial RF components, avoiding custom fabrication for most parts.
  • Air cooling alone is sufficient for continuous operation at RF powers up to 100 W, since the permanent magnets stay below 80 °C.
  • The measured emittance values of 0.065 and 0.031 π mm mrad and the sub-20 mm spot size place the source in a useful range for focused low-current beams.
  • Operating the source with other gases should require little more than a different pressure regulator, making it a multi-species source.
  • The choice of 3 GHz rather than 2.45 GHz yields higher extracted current because current scales with the square of frequency.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper does not mass-analyze the extracted beam, so an immediate follow-up would be to quantify H2+ and H3+ fractions; the source may still be useful, but the quoted current and emittance would then describe a mixed beam.
  • The same construction recipe could be translated to other frequencies by scaling the chamber diameter and magnet field according to the resonance condition, yielding a family of compact sources rather than a single design.
  • The 4.3 µA total current is inferred by fitting a Gaussian to a 5 mm Faraday-cup interception; a full-aperture collector would give a direct measurement and test that inference.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The manuscript describes the design, construction, and first beam tests of a compact ECR ion source (PIT30) built at UPV/EHU. The design emphasizes commercial off-the-shelf vacuum components, a permanent-magnet Halbach array for the ECR field, a 3 GHz solid-state RF chain, and a tetrode extraction system with an Einzel lens. The authors report a 6 keV beam characterized by a phosphor screen (spot size <20 mm), a Faraday cup (current up to 0.68 uA, extrapolated to 4.3 uA total), and a pepperpot emittance measurement (eps_x = 0.065, eps_y = 0.031 pi mm mrad). They conclude that the source produces a low-emittance proton beam with small spot size suitable for low-current industrial and biomedical applications, and that the source compares favorably to traditional ion sources for small-scale uses.

Significance. If the claims hold, the paper demonstrates that a functional ECR ion source can be assembled at low cost from mostly standard, commercially available parts, with modest RF power and air cooling. The detailed engineering description (RF chain, DC break, vacuum simulation, electrode design) is valuable for practitioners. The reported beam measurements, if confirmed and properly qualified, would support the usefulness of the design for low-current applications. However, the central attribution of the beam as a 'proton beam' is not established by the diagnostics used, and the current and emittance numbers lack uncertainty budgets and resolution corrections. The strengths are the practical construction details and the explicit reporting of measured RF and beam data; the main weakness is the species-blind characterization.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; Section 3; Conclusions] The beam is repeatedly called a proton beam (Abstract, Conclusions, Table 1), but none of the diagnostics in Section 3 -- phosphor screen, Faraday cup, pepperpot -- distinguishes charge-to-mass species. An H2 ECR discharge typically contains H+, H2+, and H3+ in proportions that depend on pressure and power. The measured 4.3 uA and the emittance values therefore characterize a mixture of ion species unless a mass analysis is performed. The authors themselves describe the source as multi-species and state that other gases can be used. A magnetic or electrostatic mass analyzer, or a time-of-flight measurement, is required before the 'proton beam' label can be accepted.
  2. [Section 3, beam current measurement] The total current of 4.3 uA is obtained by extrapolating the Faraday cup signal (about 0.68 uA at the best lens setting) with a Gaussian fit to the phosphor screen image, assuming the beam is azimuthally symmetric and fully contained in the measurement plane. The manuscript provides no uncertainty on the extrapolation factor of 6.25, no discussion of Faraday cup alignment or secondary-electron suppression, and no estimate of beam loss along the 600 mm transport path. As the current is a headline number, a full error budget and a direct check (e.g., a larger-aperture Faraday cup or a scan of the cup) are needed.
  3. [Section 3, pepperpot emittance] The pepperpot emittance values (eps_x = 0.065, eps_y = 0.031 pi mm mrad) are quoted to three significant figures without any resolution correction or uncertainty estimate. With 0.45 mm holes and a 37 mm drift, the geometric divergence resolution is roughly 12 mrad, which is comparable to the measured divergence spread; without a deconvolution or a statement of the pepperpot resolution, the numerical comparison with other sources is not robust. The paper also does not state whether the emittance is rms, normalized, or 90% emittance, which is essential for comparison.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Section 2.2.3, Fig. 6] The text says the RF losses at 3 GHz are 'only -14.8 dB,' but a -14.8 dB S21 corresponds to roughly 3% power transmission, which is a large loss and inconsistent with the word 'only' and with the later statement of a <5 C temperature rise. The sign or magnitude should be checked.
  2. [Section 2.2.1] The equation for the resonant field is garbled as 'B = 2πf m, where ... m and e are respectively the mass and charge of the electron.' The correct expression is B = 2π f m_e / e, and the denominator is missing.
  3. [Table 1 and Section 3] The design parameters in Table 1 (<50 uA H+, <0.2 pi mm mrad) are not compared explicitly with the measured values in the text. A short comparison table or sentence would help the reader assess how well the design targets were met.
  4. [Figure 11] The Faraday cup current curve is shown without error bars; at least representative error bars per point are needed.
  5. [Section 1 and 4] The term 'off resonance' is used in the Conclusions, but the design is based on electron cyclotron resonance at 3 GHz with a 110 mT field. Please clarify what 'off resonance' means here, or remove the term.
  6. [Abstract and Throughout] Until a species measurement is provided, the phrase 'proton beam' should be qualified as 'hydrogen-ion beam' or 'beam extracted from a hydrogen plasma' in all places.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the beam current and emittance are measured outputs, not fitted inputs; the only self-citation is contextual.

full rationale

This is an experimental construction-and-characterization paper, not a derivation chain. Design choices rest on standard ECR relations (B = 2*pi*f*m/e and current scaling with frequency from Geller [21]), and the reported outputs—4.3 uA total current, horizontal emittance 0.065 pi mm mrad, and vertical emittance 0.031 pi mm mrad—are measured in Section 3 with a Faraday cup, phosphor screen, and pepperpot. The total current is the cup reading scaled by a Gaussian fit to the spot image; the fit is to the image, not to the current value, so no fitted parameter is relabeled as a prediction. Table 1 values are design targets, not fitting inputs. The only self-citation, [23], supports the statement that the Halbach array 'has proved to be efficient for Hydrogen plasma production'; this is contextual experimental support and is not load-bearing because the source operability is demonstrated by the paper's own beam measurements. There is a genuine evidentiary caveat, but it is not circularity: the Abstract and Conclusions attribute the beam and the emittance values to protons, while Section 3 reports no mass-to-charge analysis and no stated resolution or uncertainty correction for the pepperpot emittance. This is an unsupported factual label, not a reduction of an output to an input.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper introduces no new particles, forces, or theoretical entities. It relies on standard ECR physics, commercial components, and standard beam diagnostics. The main assumption is the Gaussian beam profile used for the current extrapolation. The frequency-scaling law is taken from prior literature, not derived. The central experimental claim is grounded in direct measurement, though with limited error analysis.

free parameters (1)
  • Total beam current correction factor = 6.25
    Used in Section 3 to convert the Faraday cup current (about 0.69 microamps) into a total beam current of 4.3 microamps. The factor is derived from a Gaussian fit to the beam spot on a partially damaged phosphor screen, assuming a beam diameter relative to the 5 mm cup. It is a data-derived scaling, not a first-principles value, and carries no uncertainty.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Extracted ion beam current scales with the square of the microwave frequency.
    Invoked in Section 2 to justify choosing 3 GHz over 2.45 GHz. Cited to Geller [21], but not derived in this paper. If this scaling is wrong or not applicable, the frequency choice loses its stated rationale.
  • domain assumption The transverse beam intensity profile is Gaussian.
    Used in Section 3 to extrapolate the total beam current from the Faraday cup measurement. The Gaussian fit has R^2=0.93 on a screen with damaged regions, so the profile is plausible but not exact, and the fitted parameters are not reported with uncertainties.
  • domain assumption The pepperpot emittance analysis procedure of Zhang [28] is valid for this beam.
    The emittance values are calculated following the cited procedure, assuming that the pepperpot hole spacing and screen distance yield an accurate phase-space reconstruction. The paper provides no independent check of the emittance result.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of New compact ion source design and implementation for low current applications." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/Q2PQJJM5

@misc{pith2026250118992,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: New compact ion source design and implementation for low current applications},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/Q2PQJJM5}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.18992}
}
read the original abstract

A new compact electron cyclotron resonance (ECR) ion source for low current applications, designed and built in-house at the University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU) is presented. The source was designed to use as many commercially available components as possible for key tasks such as electromagnetic resonators, magnetic structure, RF power couplers and beam transport, to lower the cost and lessen reliance on specially made parts for spares. This leads to a cost-effective yet compact and fully functional design. The main design decisions are described and experiments on plasma generation and the proton beam extracted using the source are shown and discussed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.18992 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. Preliminary simulation of the electric field in the plasma chamber generated by a 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. Photograph of the Halbach array mounted on the plasma chamber. 2.2.2. Beam extraction and optics Beam extraction is achieved through the use of a tetrode system. The first elec￾trode as mentioned before also doubles as part of the magnetic system of the plasma chamber, and it has a 5 mm diameter extraction aperture with a chamfer at the pierce angle. This first electrode along with the plasma chamber are at the extr… view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Cross-section of the DC break, 1 and 3 are standard N to WG 284 transitions, 2 is the custom made nylon separator. 1 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (6 more)
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Measured RF scattering parameters in dB (S11)(adaptation) and (S21) (loss) as a function of frequency for the DC break centered around 3 GHz. 2.3. Vacuum system The vacuum pumps for the system were dimensioned by simulating the vacuum system using Molflow+ [25]. The sy…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Schematic of the elements that make up the RF Chain used to generate the plasma in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Photograph of the ion source as tested with one of the protective panels removed. 1) [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Image of the 6 keV beam spot on the phosphorescent screen when focused to the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_9.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Beam current measured at the Faraday cup for a 6 keV beam as a function of the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Horizontal and vertical divergence vs. position for a 6 keV beam, with 3.8 kV in the [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_12.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 33 canonical work pages

  1. [23]

    Ren H.T., Peng S.X., Lu P.N. et Al. (2014) Commissioning and operation of the deuteron injector for PKUNIFTY project Review of Scientific Instru- ments, vol. 85, number 2, 02A706,

    work page 2014

  2. [1]

    However, most are still expensive and bulky

    Introduction Ion sources have always been important for high energy physics [1] but increasingly have gained relevance for industry, ion implantation and bio -medical environments [2]. However, most are still expensive and bulky. Their technology is a very active field of research, with clear scientific and economic interest [3]. Electron cyclotron resona...

    work page 2019

  3. [2]

    Based on ECR principles, the main design parameters are summarized in Table 1

    Description of the source The ion source is conceived for low current industrial and bio applications. Based on ECR principles, the main design parameters are summarized in Table 1. Al- though the table refers to H2, the ion source can be operated with gases other than Hydrogen, for instance for Helium, Nitrogen or any other elemental gas for ion producti...

    work page

  4. [3]

    Figure 8 shows a photograph of the ion source as it stands, and where most of the elements described in the previous sec- tions can be seen

    Beam measurements Once the ion source was fully assembled and the individual components were tested separately, beam extraction experiments were carried out in order to validate the operability of the complete ion source. Figure 8 shows a photograph of the ion source as it stands, and where most of the elements described in the previous sec- tions can be ...

    work page

  5. [4]

    Conclusions A newly designed compact electron cyclotron resonance (ECR) multi-species ion source for low current applications has been built and tested. As a key ingredi- ent of the design, we have shown that using mostly off-the-shelf components is a viable way to construct a low cost yet perfectly functional off resonance ECR ion source. By keeping the ...

    work page 2018

  6. [5]

    Muramatsu, A

    M. Muramatsu, A. Kitagawa, Y. Sakamoto, Y. Sato, S. Yamada, H. Ogawa, A. G. Drentje, S. Biri, and Y. Yoshida (2004) Compact ECR ion source with permanent magnets for carbon therapy. Review of Scientific Instruments , vol 75, 1925. 19

    work page 2004

  7. [6]

    Bailey (Ed.) (2013) CASCERN Accelerator School: Ion Sources

    R. Bailey (Ed.) (2013) CASCERN Accelerator School: Ion Sources. CERN- 2013-007

    work page 2013

  8. [7]

    Zhurin (2011) Industrial Ion Sources: Broadbeam Gridless Ion Source Technology

    V.V. Zhurin (2011) Industrial Ion Sources: Broadbeam Gridless Ion Source Technology. Wiley-VCH

    work page 2011

Show all 33 references
  1. [8]

    I. G. Brown (Ed.) (2010) The Physics and Technology of Ion Sources 2nd Ed. Wiley-VCH

    2010

  2. [9]

    Geller (1996) Electron Cyclotron Resonance Ion Sources and ECR Plasmas , CRC Press

    R. Geller (1996) Electron Cyclotron Resonance Ion Sources and ECR Plasmas , CRC Press

    1996

  3. [10]

    S., Wu W., et Al

    Zhang T., Peng. S., Wu W., et Al. (2018) Practical 2.45-GHz microwave- driven Cs -free H - ion source developed at Peking University Chinese Physics B, vol.27, number10, 105208

    2018

  4. [11]

    Winkelmann, R

    T. Winkelmann, R. Cee, T. Haberer, B. Naas, A. Peters, S. Scheloske, P. Spdtke, and K. Tinschert (2008) Electron cyclotron resonance ion source ex- perience at the Heidelberg Ion Beam Therapy Center. Review of Scientific Instruments, vol 79, 02A331

    2008

  5. [12]

    D. Z. Xie (2002) The BIE100 ECR ion source. Review of Scientific Instru- ments, vol 73, 531

    2002

  6. [13]

    L. T. Sun, Y. Shang, B. H. Ma, X. Z. Zhang, Y. C. Feng, X. X. Li, H. Wang, X. H. Guo, M. T. Song, H. Y. Zhao, Z. M. Zhang, H. W. Zhao, and D. Z. Xie (2008) An electron cyclotron resonance ion source based low energy ion beam platform. Review of Scientific Instruments, vol 79, 02B711

    2008

  7. [14]

    (2010) Re- view on high current 2.45 GHz electron cyclotron resonance sources Review of Scientific Instruments, vol

    Gammino S., Celona L., Ciavola G., Maimone, F., Mascali, D. (2010) Re- view on high current 2.45 GHz electron cyclotron resonance sources Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 81, number 2, 02B313

    2010

  8. [15]

    87, number 2, 02A715

    Skalyga V., Izotov I., Golubev S., Vodopyanov A., Tarvainen O., (2016) First experiments with gasdynamic ion source in CW mode, Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 87, number 2, 02A715

    2016

  9. [16]

    Tuske O., Chauvin N., Delferriere O., Fils J., Gauthier, Y., (2018) Commis- sioning of the ECR ion source of the high intensity proton injector of the Facility for Antiproton and Ion Research (FAIR) Review of Scientific Instru- ments, volume 89, number 5, 052303

    2018

  10. [17]

    Izotov I., Skalyga V., Golubev S., Bokhanov A., (2011) Study of plasma parameters in a CW gasdynamic ECRIS, AIP Conference Proceedings, volume 2011, 1, 030004

    2011

  11. [18]

    45, number4, 665–671

    Roychowdhury P., Mishra L., Kewlani H., Gharat S., (2017) Hydrogen Plasma Characterization at Low Pressure in 2.45 GHz Electron Cyclotron Resonance Proton Ion Source, IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science , vol. 45, number4, 665–671

    2017

  12. [19]

    (2016) New progress of high current gasdynamic ion source, Review of Scientific Instruments , vol

    Skalyga V., Izotov I., Golubev S., et Al. (2016) New progress of high current gasdynamic ion source, Review of Scientific Instruments , vol. 87, number2, 02A716 20

    2016

  13. [20]

    606, number 3, 296–304

    Kondrashev S., Barcikowski A., Mustapha B., Ostroumov P.N., Vinogradov N., (2009) Development of a pepper pot emittance probe and its applica- tion for ECR ion beam studies, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors a...

    2009

  14. [21]

    795, 45–51

    Roychowdhury P., Kewlani H., Mishra L., Gharat S., Rajawat R.K., (2015) Emittance and proton fraction measurement in High current electron cy- clotron resonance proton ion source, Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detec...

    2015

  15. [22]

    Q., Sun L

    Cao, Y., and Li J. Q., Sun L. T., et Al. (2014) An all permanent magnet elec- tron cyclotron resonance ion source for heavy ion therapy Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 85, number 2, 02A960

    2014

  16. [24]

    81, number 2, 02A328

    Lettry J., Penescu L., Wallner J., Sargsyan E., (2010) Ion sources for MedAus- tron, Review of Scientific Instruments, vol. 81, number 2, 02A328

    2010

  17. [25]

    Kersevan R., Pons J.L. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 27, 1017 (2009)

    2009

  18. [26]

    (1990) ECRIS: The electron cyclotron resonance ion sources Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, vol.40, number 1, 15–44,

    Geller, R. (1990) ECRIS: The electron cyclotron resonance ion sources Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science, vol.40, number 1, 15–44,

    1990

  19. [27]

    http://www.vacom.de/

  20. [28]

    and Arredondo, I (2018) Hydrogen electron cyclotron resonance ion sources plasma characterization based on simple optical emission spectroscopy

    Feuchtwanger, J., Etxebarria, V., Portilla, J., Jugo, J., Badillo, I. and Arredondo, I (2018) Hydrogen electron cyclotron resonance ion sources plasma characterization based on simple optical emission spectroscopy. Nuclear In- struments and Methods in Physics Research A, vol 8...

    2018

  21. [29]

    and Engesser F

    Albert W., Schnitzer R. and Engesser F. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 45, 1289 (1974) 21

    1974

  22. [31]

    Department of Defense, MIL-HDBK-419A (1987), Military Handbook grounding, bonding, and shielding for electronic equipments and facilities vol

    U.S. Department of Defense, MIL-HDBK-419A (1987), Military Handbook grounding, bonding, and shielding for electronic equipments and facilities vol. I and II

    1987

  23. [32]

    http://www.aps.anl.gov/epics/

  24. [33]

    FERMILAB-TM-1988,(october, 1996)

    Zhang, M. FERMILAB-TM-1988,(october, 1996)

    1988

  25. [1082]

    For future applications this configuration has the advantage that it can handle all the timing signals needed to synchronize RF -based accelerating elements and diagnostics

    chassis with a real time controller (PXIe-8108) with a front end programmed in LabVIEW is used to monitor and control all the signals in the system. For future applications this configuration has the advantage that it can handle all the timing signals needed to synchronize RF ...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.