Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 46 references

An action of the Witt algebra on Khovanov-Rozansky homology

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper constructs an action of the positive part of the Witt algebra on Khovanov-Rozansky gl_N link homology and proves it is invariant under Reidemeister moves and functorial for link cobordisms.

desk verdict A plausible and well-written enrichment of gl_N link homology whose main risk is a single load-bearing citation to QRSW24; worth a serious referee, with the abstract's Lee-homology/genus-bound claims needing attention. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.19096 v3 pith:XNC2CSBR submitted 2025-01-31 math.GT math.QA

Alexis Guérin , Felix Roz This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.GTmath.QA MSC 57K1857K1617B1018N2518G35
keywords WittalgebraactionKhovanov-Rozanskyhomologygl_Nlinkfoamevaluationrelativehomotopycategorycobordismstoruslinkssymmetricpolynomials
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper aims to show that Khovanov-Rozansky gl_N link homology carries a substantial symmetry: an action of the subalgebra of the Witt algebra generated by the operators L_n for n at least -1. This action is built locally on foams, and the authors prove that the resulting chain complex for any framed oriented link is unchanged by Reidemeister moves, up to isomorphism in a relative homotopy category. They also prove that link cobordisms induce equivariant maps between twisted homologies, once the source and target links are decorated with bookkeeping dots. If correct, every framed link acquires a module structure over an infinite-dimensional Lie algebra, refining previously known sl2 symmetries and giving explicit presentations for Hopf and (2,m) torus links. State spaces of simple webs are identified with the standard Witt-algebra action on symmetric polynomials, which is what makes the torus-link computations possible.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the local W_{\infty}^{-1}-action on foams: for each generator L_n, formulas (9)-(17) specify its effect on polynomial decorations and on each basic foam, with parameters s, $\lambda$, and mu, and the action extends by the Leibniz rule to foams in good position. A second mechanism is the relative homotopy category, the Verdier quotient by complexes that become null-homotopic once the W_{\infty}^{-1}-module structure is forgotten; this absorbs the non-equivariant homotopies that appear in Reidemeister-move proofs. A third mechanism is twisting by red dots: Maurer-Cartan elements attached to edges deform the module structure, and dot-migration lemmas allow these dots to slide, so that cobordism maps can be made equivariant. The state spaces themselves are quotients by foam-evaluation relations, and the cited theorem that the local L_n respect those relations is what converts local formulas into a global link invariant.

What would settle it

Choose a small web, such as the theta web with thicknesses (1,1,2), and compute L_n on both sides of the dot-migration relation from [RW20a, eq. (11)]; if the two results differ for any n, the state-space action does not exist and Theorems 5.1 and 6.4 lose their foundation. Alternatively, run the explicit Reidemeister II complex comparison of Proposition 5.9 for small N and check whether the two complexes are genuinely isomorphic in the relative homotopy category rather than merely homotopy equivalent after forgetting the module structure.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is that explicit local operators L_n, defined by equations (9)-(17) on basic foams by acting on polynomial decorations through L_n(Q) = -sum_i $x_i^{{n+1}}$ partial Q / partial x_i and on cups, caps, saddles, zips, unzips, digons, and associativity foams, descend to a well-defined action of W_{\infty}^{-1} on the gl_N state space of every web. The action can be twisted by Maurer-Cartan elements encoded as red dots on edges, and these twists make the crossing braiding complexes equivariant. The main theorems state that the complex KRWN(L) is a framed link invariant in the relative homotopy category and that KRWN is a functor from the category of framed links with red-dot labels to the homotopy category of W_{\infty}^{-1}-modules whose cobordism images are equivariant. Concretely, the homology of the positive Hopf link and of T(2,m) torus links is given with explicit bases on which every L_n acts by explicit formulas, and for N=2 the resulting module structure is analyzed completely, including cases where it is irreducible.

Load-bearing premise

The whole construction depends on the cited result that the local operators L_n are compatible with every foam-evaluation relation used to build the state spaces; this compatibility is not re-derived here, so if any such relation is not preserved, the Reidemeister-invariance and functoriality arguments collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The complex KRWN(L) is a framed link invariant in the relative homotopy category, and taking homology yields an unframed invariant together with a genuine W_{\infty}^{-1} # R_N-module structure on Khovanov-Rozansky homology.
  • Connected link concordances induce W_{\infty}^{-1}-equivariant maps, because their Euler characteristic is zero and no red-dot bookkeeping is required.
  • The action restricts to the sl2 action generated by L_{-1}, 2L_0, and -L_1, so the previously studied sl2 symmetries of gl_N-homology become special cases of the Witt action.
  • State spaces of circle and theta webs carry the standard polynomial representation of W_{\infty}^{-1}, yielding explicit formulas for the action on T(2,m) torus links and a full description of the N=2 case.
  • The degree-raising property deg_N(L_n F) = deg_N(F) + 2n provides a new grading filtration on the homology that can be used for structural analysis.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • A natural extension the paper does not pursue is to transfer the W_{\infty}^{-1} action to Skein lasagna modules; if the functoriality behaves as stated, the infinite-dimensional state spaces of these 4-manifold invariants would decompose into weight spaces, potentially making them more computable.
  • The parameters s, lambda, and mu suggest a family of module structures rather than a single one; varying them may interpolate between known link-homology symmetries, and whether the resulting invariants are independent of these choices is left open.
  • The explicit torus-link bases make it possible to test whether the advertised relations to Lee homology and genus bounds are W_{\infty}^{-1}-equivariant; this would turn those structural claims into concrete spectral-sequence or inequality statements.
  • Because invariance is proved only in the relative homotopy category, a natural open question is whether the W_{\infty}^{-1} module structure itself, rather than merely the underlying complex, is independent of the red-dot bookkeeping choices.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper constructs a W∞_{-1}-action on Khovanov–Rozansky gl_N link homology, extending the sl_2-action of Qi–Robert–Sussan–Wagner. The authors define local foam operators L_n following [QRSW24], introduce red-dot twists, build braiding complexes in a relative homotopy category of W∞_{-1}-modules, and prove Reidemeister invariance and functoriality for framed links. They also compute explicit bases and actions for T(2,m) torus links and give structural results for N=2, including irreducibility statements for certain W∞_{-1}-modules.

Significance. If correct, the paper establishes a genuinely new infinite-dimensional symmetry of Khovanov–Rozansky homology that goes beyond the previously known sl_2 action. The main theorems are substantial: every framed oriented link is assigned a W∞_{-1}-module structure that is invariant up to isomorphism in the relative homotopy category, and the construction is functorial for a suitable category of cobordisms with red-dot labels. The explicit computations for T(2,m) links and the N=2 structural analysis are valuable and consistent with known sl_2 structures; the paper is careful to present diagrammatic constructions and to credit the foam-action machinery to [QRSW24]. The main risk is concentration of correctness in an imported compatibility theorem and in several equivariance checks that are left to the reader.

major comments (3)
  1. [Section 3.3, Theorem 3.7] The entire construction rests on the statement that the local operators L_n descend to the state space F_N(Γ), i.e. that they preserve every foam-evaluation relation defining F_N(Γ), in particular the dot-migration relation [RW20a, (11)] and the theta/rotation relations used in Lemmas 4.9–4.11. Proposition 3.6 only verifies the Witt bracket on basic foams before taking the quotient, and the cup case is referred to [QRSW24, p.24]. Since Theorems 5.1 and 6.4 depend on this compatibility, the paper should either prove it or give a precise citation to the exact statement and proof in [QRSW24] covering the full set of state-space relations. Without this, a failure of L_n to preserve even one relation would invalidate the braiding complexes (29)–(30) and the Reidemeister arguments in Section 5.
  2. [Section 4, Lemmas 4.14–4.17; Section 5, Lemma 5.2 and Proposition 5.10] Several equivariance statements that are load-bearing for the invariance proof are asserted with proofs left to the reader or described as analogous: Lemmas 4.14–4.17, the W∞_{-1}-equivariance of all maps in the short exact sequences (32) and (33), the Maurer–Cartan twists (1)–(2) in Lemma 5.2, and the κ∘σ equivariance in Proposition 5.10. These morphisms are exactly the ones used to obtain the Reidemeister isomorphisms via Corollary 2.3, so their equivariance is not a cosmetic detail. The authors should include the missing checks or give a precise reduction to the computations already displayed.
  3. [Section 5.2, Lemma 5.2] The proof of the sliding lemma introduces a short exact sequence (32) whose splitting is asserted to be W∞_{-1}-equivariant only after 'the verification is left to the reader.' The same applies to the null-homotopy of xC'' in the relative category. Because Lemma 5.2 is used repeatedly in Corollaries 5.4–5.6 and in the Reidemeister I and II arguments, the reader cannot fully verify Theorem 5.1 without reconstructing these computations. Please provide the missing details or an explicit reference to a place where they appear.
minor comments (3)
  1. [Section 5.6] The passage from framed to unframed invariance is very brief: the statement that a solid red dot of label 1/2 can be added to each crossing and then slid and combined into at most one twist per component needs a few more sentences or a diagrammatic justification, especially since the unframed complexes (57)–(58) are asserted to be invariant under all Reidemeister moves.
  2. [Abstract and Section 7] The abstract promises that 'the state spaces of simple webs are identified with standard representations of the Witt algebra on polynomials,' but the body does not contain an explicit statement or theorem to this effect. The computations for the circle and theta webs in Section 7 partially support this, but the identification should be stated and proved or the abstract should be adjusted.
  3. [Throughout] There are several typos and formatting infelicities, including 'For :C(A#H)→C (A)' in Section 2.1, 'projbigr' in Corollary 6.6, and inconsistent use of math mode for gl_N in the introduction. These do not affect the mathematics but should be corrected.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the Witt action is imported from the external theorem [QRSW24, Thm 4.4], and the only self-citation [Roz23] is a non-load-bearing prior computation.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is not circular. The central W∞−1-action on state spaces FN(Γ) is imported from the external theorem [QRSW24, Thm 4.4], restated as Theorem 3.7, rather than derived from the Reidemeister-invariance result being proved; the present authors are not the authors of [QRSW24]. Proposition 3.6 verifies the Witt bracket on foams in good position, with one cup computation delegated to [QRSW24, p.24]; this is a cited external computation, not a fitted input. The Reidemeister and functoriality arguments in Section 5 use the relative homotopy category C_H(A) exactly as defined in Section 2: isomorphisms are witnessed by explicit chain maps whose cones are contractible after forgetting the W∞−1-action (Corollary 2.3), so the conclusions are not built into the definition any more than in any Verdier-quotient argument. The red-dot twists are closed formulas (equations 19–21) with flatness proved in Proposition 4.3, and the torus-link actions in Section 7 are computed from the definitions rather than fitted to targets. The only self-citation, [Roz23], supplies a prior T(2,k) torus-link computation and is not load-bearing for Theorems 5.1 or 6.4. The abstract's unfulfilled promise of Lee-homology and genus-bound consequences, and the delegated or asserted contractibility checks in the Reidemeister proofs, are completeness or correctness risks, not circular reductions.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim does not invent new mathematical entities; it imports a known foam action and adds twist and bookkeeping parameters. The largest unpaid input is the cited QRSW24 theorem that the foam action survives the state-space quotient, together with the foam evaluation formalism from RW20a.

free parameters (4)
  • s
    Ring element parameterizing the W∞ action on zips/unzips and appearing in the braiding complexes (Eqs. 11-14 and 29-30). The invariant KRWN_{λ,μ,s} is a family depending on s; no value is fitted to data.
  • λ
    Ring element used in triangular red dot twists and in cup/cap formulas (Definition 4.2, Eqs. 15-16). It is an arbitrary parameter of the construction, not fitted.
  • μ
    Ring element paired with λ in the same formulas (Eqs. 11-14, 29-30). Arbitrary parameter of the action family.
  • red dot labels ω1, ω2
    Local twist labels introduced in Definition 4.2 to force W∞-equivariance of cobordism maps. They are variables of the twisted category, not determined by data.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption Foam evaluation relations of [RW20a] define the state spaces FN(Γ) and allow red dots to migrate along facets.
    Used throughout Sections 3-5; dot migration [RW20a, (11)] underlies Lemmas 4.9-4.11 and Lemma 5.6.
  • domain assumption The W∞_{-1} action on gl_N foams descends to a well-defined action on state spaces, cited as [QRSW24, Theorem 4.4] and reproduced as Theorem 3.7.
    This is the main external input; the paper does not re-prove compatibility of L_n with all foam relations.
  • domain assumption Every foam is isotopic to a foam in good position ([QW24]).
    Needed to define L_n on arbitrary foams by the Leibniz rule and by 0 on isotopy traces in Section 3.2.
  • standard math Verdier quotient and relative homotopy category machinery from [Nee01], including Lemma 2.2 on distinguished triangles.
    Underpins the reduction of Reidemeister invariance to contractible complexes in Section 5.
  • domain assumption 2 is invertible in the ground ring R.
    Formulas use division by 2 in many places, e.g., cup/cap actions (15)-(17) and red-dot bookkeeping in Section 4.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of An action of the Witt algebra on Khovanov-Rozansky homology." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XNC2CSBR

@misc{pith2026250119096,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: An action of the Witt algebra on Khovanov-Rozansky homology},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XNC2CSBR}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.19096}
}
abstract

We construct an action of the positive part of the Witt algebra on Khovanov--Rozansky $\mathfrak{gl}_N$-link homology and show that link cobordisms induce equivariant maps between twists of the homology. Moreover, the state spaces of simple webs are identified with standard representations of the Witt algebra on polynomials. Some simple relations to Lee homology and genus bounds are derived from the analysis of this presentation.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2501.19096 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. The three local models of the definition of foams. One denotes by Y (a,b) the one in the middle and T (a,b,c) the one on the right. Let F be a foam, one denotes by: • F 2 the collection of facets of F. • F 1 the collection of bindings of F. • F 0 the collection of singular vertices of F. We partition F 1 as follows: F 1 = F 1 ◦ ⊔ F 1 −, where F 1 ◦ is the collection of circular bindings of F, and F 1 − is the collec… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. The degree of a basic foam is given below the name of each of the local models. 3.2. W∞ −1 -action. Definition 3.5. Let W be the Lie algebra, over R, generated by (Ln)n∈Z with relations ∀n, m ∈ Z: (6) [Ln, Lm] = (n − m)Ln+m. This algebra is called Witt algebra. Let us denote W∞ −1 , the Lie subalgebra gener￾ated by symbols (Ln)n⩾−1. The map: (7) i [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 14 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Putyra, and Stephan M

    Anna Beliakova, Matthew Hogancamp, Krzysztof K. Putyra, and Stephan M. Wehrli. On the functoriality of sl _2 tangle homology. Algebr. Geom. Topol. , 23(3):1303--1361, 2023. https://doi.org/10.2140/agt.2023.23.1303 doi:10.2140/agt.2023.23.1303

    doi:10.2140/agt.2023.23.1303 2023

  2. [2]

    An oriented model for K hovanov homology

    Christian Blanchet. An oriented model for K hovanov homology. J. Knot Theory Ramifications , 19(2):291--312, 2010. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218216510007863 doi:10.1142/S0218216510007863

    doi:10.1142/s0218216510007863 2010

  3. [3]

    Khovanov's homology for tangles and cobordisms

    Dror Bar-Natan. Khovanov's homology for tangles and cobordisms. Geom. Topol. , 9:1443--1499, 2005. https://doi.org/10.2140/gt.2005.9.1443 doi:10.2140/gt.2005.9.1443

    doi:10.2140/gt.2005.9.1443 2005

  4. [4]

    An sl(2) tangle homology and seamed cobordisms

    Carmen Livia Caprau. An sl(2) tangle homology and seamed cobordisms . ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 2007. Thesis (Ph.D.)--The University of Iowa. URL: http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqdiss&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3281349

    work page 2007

  5. [5]

    Remarks on coloured triply graded link invariants

    Sabin Cautis. Remarks on coloured triply graded link invariants. Algebr. Geom. Topol. , 17(6):3811--3836, 2017. https://doi.org/10.2140/agt.2017.17.3811 doi:10.2140/agt.2017.17.3811

    work page doi:10.2140/agt.2017.17.3811 2017

  6. [6]

    Louis Crane and Igor B. Frenkel. Four-dimensional topological quantum field theory, H opf categories, and the canonical bases. J. Math. Phys. , 35(10):5136--5154, 1994. Topology and physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.530746 doi:10.1063/1.530746

    doi:10.1063/1.530746 1994

  7. [7]

    Structures in HOMFLY - PT H omology

    Alex Chandler and Eugene Gorsky. Structures in HOMFLY - PT H omology. Exp. Math. , 33(4):817--842, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/10586458.2023.2300412 doi:10.1080/10586458.2023.2300412

    work page arXiv 2024

  8. [8]

    Fixing the functoriality of K hovanov homology

    David Clark, Scott Morrison, and Kevin Walker. Fixing the functoriality of K hovanov homology. Geom. Topol. , 13(3):1499--1582, 2009. https://doi.org/10.2140/gt.2009.13.1499 doi:10.2140/gt.2009.13.1499

    doi:10.2140/gt.2009.13.1499 2009

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    Categorifying H ecke algebras at prime roots of unity, part I

    Ben Elias and You Qi. Categorifying H ecke algebras at prime roots of unity, part I . Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 376(11):7691--7742, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1090/tran/8908 doi:10.1090/tran/8908

    2023 doi

  2. [10]

    Generic gl _2 -foams, web and arc algebras, 2020

    Michael Ehrig, Catharina Stroppel, and Daniel Tubbenhauer. Generic gl _2 -foams, web and arc algebras, 2020. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.08010, https://arxiv.org/abs/1601.08010 arXiv:1601.08010

    2020 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Functoriality of colored link homologies

    Michael Ehrig, Daniel Tubbenhauer, and Paul Wedrich. Functoriality of colored link homologies. Proc. Lond. Math. Soc. (3) , 117(5):996--1040, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1112/plms.12154 doi:10.1112/plms.12154

    2018 doi

  4. [12]

    Tautological classes and symmetry in K hovanov- R ozansky homology

    Eugene Gorsky, Matthew Hogancamp, and Anton Mellit. Tautological classes and symmetry in K hovanov- R ozansky homology. Duke Math. J. , 173(13):2481--2561, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1215/00127094-2023-0063 doi:10.1215/00127094-2023-0063

    2024 doi

  5. [13]

    Elisenda Grigsby, Anthony M

    J. Elisenda Grigsby, Anthony M. Licata, and Stephan M. Wehrli. Annular K hovanov homology and knotted S chur- W eyl representations. Compos. Math. , 154(3):459--502, 2018. https://doi.org/10.1112/S0010437X17007540 doi:10.1112/S0010437X17007540

    2018 doi

  6. [14]

    On stable K hovanov homology of torus knots

    Eugene Gorsky, Alexei Oblomkov, and Jacob Rasmussen. On stable K hovanov homology of torus knots. Exp. Math. , 22(3):265--281, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1080/10586458.2013.798553 doi:10.1080/10586458.2013.798553

    2013

  7. [15]

    An invariant of link cobordisms from K hovanov homology

    Magnus Jacobsson. An invariant of link cobordisms from K hovanov homology. Algebr. Geom. Topol. , 4:1211--1251, 2004. https://doi.org/10.2140/agt.2004.4.1211 doi:10.2140/agt.2004.4.1211

    2004 doi

  8. [16]

    A categorification of the J ones polynomial

    Mikhail Khovanov. A categorification of the J ones polynomial. Duke Math. J. , 101(3):359--426, 2000. https://doi.org/10.1215/S0012-7094-00-10131-7 doi:10.1215/S0012-7094-00-10131-7

    2000 doi

  9. [17]

    sl(3) link homology

    Mikhail Khovanov. sl(3) link homology. Algebr. Geom. Topol. , 4:1045--1081, 2004. https://doi.org/10.2140/agt.2004.4.1045 doi:10.2140/agt.2004.4.1045

    2004 doi

  10. [18]

    An invariant of tangle cobordisms

    Mikhail Khovanov. An invariant of tangle cobordisms. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 358(1):315--327, 2006. https://doi.org/10.1090/S0002-9947-05-03665-2 doi:10.1090/S0002-9947-05-03665-2

    2006 doi

  11. [19]

    Triply-graded link homology and H ochschild homology of S oergel bimodules

    Mikhail Khovanov. Triply-graded link homology and H ochschild homology of S oergel bimodules. Internat. J. Math. , 18(8):869--885, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0129167X07004400 doi:10.1142/S0129167X07004400

    2007 doi

  12. [20]

    Topological correlators in L andau- G inzburg models with boundaries

    Anton Kapustin and Yi Li. Topological correlators in L andau- G inzburg models with boundaries. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. , 7(4):727--749, 2003. https://doi.org/10.4310/atmp.2003.v7.n4.a5 doi:10.4310/atmp.2003.v7.n4.a5

    2003 doi

  13. [21]

    Topological L andau- G inzburg models on the world-sheet foam

    Mikhail Khovanov and Lev Rozansky. Topological L andau- G inzburg models on the world-sheet foam. Adv. Theor. Math. Phys. , 11(2):233--259, 2007. https://doi.org/10.4310/atmp.2007.v11.n2.a2 doi:10.4310/atmp.2007.v11.n2.a2

    2007 doi

  14. [22]

    Matrix factorizations and link homology

    Mikhail Khovanov and Lev Rozansky. Matrix factorizations and link homology. Fund. Math. , 199(1):1--91, 2008. https://doi.org/10.4064/fm199-1-1 doi:10.4064/fm199-1-1

    2008 doi

  15. [23]

    Matrix factorizations and link homology

    Mikhail Khovanov and Lev Rozansky. Matrix factorizations and link homology. II . Geom. Topol. , 12(3):1387--1425, 2008. https://doi.org/10.2140/gt.2008.12.1387 doi:10.2140/gt.2008.12.1387

    2008 doi

  16. [24]

    Positive half of the W itt algebra acts on triply graded link homology

    Mikhail Khovanov and Lev Rozansky. Positive half of the W itt algebra acts on triply graded link homology. Quantum Topol. , 7(4):737--795, 2016. https://doi.org/10.4171/QT/84 doi:10.4171/QT/84

    2016 doi

  17. [25]

    Lauda, Hoel Queffelec, and David E

    Aaron D. Lauda, Hoel Queffelec, and David E. V. Rose. Khovanov homology is a skew H owe 2-representation of categorified quantum sl _m . Algebr. Geom. Topol. , 15(5):2517--2608, 2015. https://doi.org/10.2140/agt.2015.15.2517 doi:10.2140/agt.2015.15.2517

    2015 doi

  18. [26]

    Symmetric Functions and Hall Polynomials

    I G Macdonald. Symmetric Functions and Hall Polynomials . Oxford University Press, 03 1995. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198534891.001.0001 doi:10.1093/oso/9780198534891.001.0001

    1995

  19. [27]

    Invariants of surfaces in smooth 4-manifolds from link homology, 2024

    Scott Morrison, Kevin Walker, and Paul Wedrich. Invariants of surfaces in smooth 4-manifolds from link homology, 2024. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.06600, https://arxiv.org/abs/2401.06600 arXiv:2401.06600

    2024

  20. [28]

    Triangulated categories , volume 148 of Annals of Mathematics Studies

    Amnon Neeman. Triangulated categories , volume 148 of Annals of Mathematics Studies . Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, 2001. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781400837212 doi:10.1515/9781400837212

    2001 doi

  21. [29]

    Holomorphic disks and knot invariants

    Peter Ozsv\'ath and Zolt\'an Szab\'o. Holomorphic disks and knot invariants. Adv. Math. , 186(1):58--116, 2004. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2003.05.001 doi:10.1016/j.aim.2003.05.001

    2004 doi

  22. [30]

    Hoel Queffelec and David E. V. Rose. The sl _n foam 2-category: a combinatorial formulation of K hovanov- R ozansky homology via categorical skew H owe duality. Adv. Math. , 302:1251--1339, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aim.2016.07.027 doi:10.1016/j.aim.2016.07.027

    2016 doi

  23. [31]

    Hoel Queffelec, David E. V. Rose, and Antonio Sartori. Annular evaluation and link homology, 2018. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.04131, https://arxiv.org/abs/1802.04131 arXiv:1802.04131

    2018 arXiv

  24. [32]

    A categorification of the colored jones polynomial at a root of unity, 2021

    You Qi, Louis-Hadrien Robert, Joshua Sussan, and Emmanuel Wagner. A categorification of the colored jones polynomial at a root of unity, 2021. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.13195, https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.13195 arXiv:2111.13195

    2021 arXiv

  25. [33]

    Symmetries of equivariant K hovanov- R ozansky homology, 2023

    You Qi, Louis-Hadrien Robert, Joshua Sussan, and Emmanuel Wagner. Symmetries of equivariant K hovanov- R ozansky homology, 2023. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.10729, https://arxiv.org/abs/2306.10729 arXiv:2306.10729

    2023 arXiv

  26. [34]

    Symmetries of gl _N -foams

    You Qi, Louis-Hadrien Robert, Joshua Sussan, and Emmanuel Wagner. Symmetries of gl _N -foams. Quantum Topol. (2024), published online first , 2024. https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.10106 arXiv:2212.10106 , https://doi.org/10.4171/QT/215 doi:10.4171/QT/215

    2024 arXiv

  27. [35]

    On some p -differential graded link homologies

    You Qi and Joshua Sussan. On some p -differential graded link homologies. Forum Math. Pi , 10:Paper No. e26, 58, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1017/fmp.2022.19 doi:10.1017/fmp.2022.19

    2022 doi

  28. [36]

    Movie moves for framed foams from multijet transversality

    Hoel Queffelec and Kevin Walker. Movie moves for framed foams from multijet transversality. Quantum Topology , 2024. https://doi.org/DOI 10.4171/QT/205 doi:DOI 10.4171/QT/205

    2024 doi

  29. [37]

    Floer homology and knot complements

    Jacob Andrew Rasmussen. Floer homology and knot complements . ProQuest LLC, Ann Arbor, MI, 2003. Thesis (Ph.D.)--Harvard University. URL: http://gateway.proquest.com/openurl?url_ver=Z39.88-2004&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:dissertation&res_dat=xri:pqdiss&rft_dat=xri:pqdiss:3091665

    2003

  30. [38]

    Khovanov- R ozansky homology and 2-braid groups

    Rapha\"el Rouquier. Khovanov- R ozansky homology and 2-braid groups. In Categorification in geometry, topology, and physics , volume 684 of Contemp. Math. , pages 147--157. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2017

    2017

  31. [39]

    An sl _2 action on link homology of t(2,k) torus links, 2023

    Felix Roz. An sl _2 action on link homology of t(2,k) torus links, 2023. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.01910, https://arxiv.org/abs/2307.01910 arXiv:2307.01910

    2023

  32. [40]

    Reshetikhin and V

    N. Reshetikhin and V. G. Turaev. Invariants of 3 -manifolds via link polynomials and quantum groups. Invent. Math. , 103(3):547--597, 1991. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01239527 doi:10.1007/BF01239527

    1991 doi

  33. [41]

    A closed formula for the evaluation of foams

    Louis-Hadrien Robert and Emmanuel Wagner. A closed formula for the evaluation of foams. Quantum Topol. , 11(3):411--487, 2020. https://doi.org/10.4171/qt/139 doi:10.4171/qt/139

    2020 doi

  34. [42]

    Symmetric K hovanov- R ozansky link homologies

    Louis-Hadrien Robert and Emmanuel Wagner. Symmetric K hovanov- R ozansky link homologies. J. \'Ec. polytech. Math. , 7:573--651, 2020. https://doi.org/10.5802/jep.124 doi:10.5802/jep.124

    2020 doi

  35. [43]

    K hovanov homology and exotic 4 -manifolds, 2024

    Qiuyu Ren and Michael Willis. K hovanov homology and exotic 4 -manifolds, 2024. URL: https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.10452, https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.10452 arXiv:2402.10452

    2024

  36. [44]

    Functoriality of K hovanov homology

    Pierre Vogel. Functoriality of K hovanov homology. J. Knot Theory Ramifications , 29(4):2050020, 66, 2020. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0218216520500200 doi:10.1142/S0218216520500200

    2020 doi

  37. [45]

    On sl (N) link homology with mod N coefficients

    Joshua Wang. On sl (N) link homology with mod N coefficients. Quantum Topol. , 15(1):87--121, 2024. https://doi.org/10.4171/qt/194 doi:10.4171/qt/194

    2024 doi

  38. [46]

    Quantum field theory and the J ones polynomial

    Edward Witten. Quantum field theory and the J ones polynomial. Comm. Math. Phys. , 121(3):351--399, 1989. URL: http://projecteuclid.org/euclid.cmp/1104178138

    1989

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.