Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 160 references

High-cadence observations of galactic nuclei by the future two-band UV-photometry mission QUVIK

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read A small two-band UV telescope could measure accretion-disk sizes in nearby active galactic nuclei by timing FUV-to-NUV light echoes.

desk verdict A solid mission science case whose one quantitative promise is a model-dependent projection from the companion paper, not a demonstrated detection capability. read the letter →

arxiv 2501.19365 v2 pith:CA7VWF5R submitted 2025-01-31 astro-ph.GA astro-ph.HE

Michal Zajaček , Norbert Werner , Henry Best , Jolie Esme L'Heureux , Jakub Řípa , Monika Pikhartová , Martin Mondek , Filip Münz
show 7 more authors
Lýdia Štofanová Petr Kurfürst Matúš Labaj Izzy L. Garland Aaron Tohuvavohu Vladimír Karas Petra Suková
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GAastro-ph.HE
keywords activegalacticnucleireverberationmappingaccretiondisksUVastronomyspacetelescopetidaldisruptioneventsquasi-periodiceruptionsQUVIK
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper makes the feasibility case that QUVIK, a small ~30-cm two-band UV space telescope, can measure the inner structure of AGN accretion disks through photometric reverberation mapping in the FUV and NUV bands. Using lamppost-reprocessing simulations, it shows that for a $10^9\,M_\odot$ black hole a cadence of about one day is enough to recover the FUV-to-NUV continuum lag, while for a $10^8\,M_\odot$ black hole the cadence must be roughly 0.1 days over a ~180-day campaign. If those cadences hold, QUVIK would deliver a sample of bright, low-redshift AGN with measured disk sizes and temperature profiles, complementing HST and Swift and testing the known discrepancy between measured and predicted disk sizes. The same fast-repointing telescope would catch early UV light of tidal disruption events and use two-band colors to separate TDEs from supernovae.

What carries the argument

The carrying mechanism is photometric reverberation mapping in the lamppost picture: a compact X-ray corona at a height of $6\,r_g$ above the black hole irradiates the accretion disk, and the disk thermally reprocesses the varying illumination so that different UV bands respond with different time delays because FUV arises at smaller disk radii than NUV. The simulations convolve a broken-power-law driving signal, whose break timescale is set by the empirical relation $\log T_B = 2.1\log(M_\bullet/10^6\,M_\odot) - 0.98\log(L_{\rm Bol}/10^{44}\,\text{erg s}^{-1}) - 2.32$, with disk transfer functions, add 2% Poisson noise, and then measure the recovered lag using the Discrete Correlation Function and the Interpolated Cross-Correlation Function with bootstrapped and MCMC uncertainties.

What would settle it

Observe one bright $10^8\,M_\odot$ AGN in FUV and NUV at 0.1-day cadence for 180 days and measure the cross-correlation lag: if the FUV-to-NUV lag predicted by the lamppost transfer functions is not recovered within the quoted uncertainties, the cadence-feasibility claim is wrong. A complementary check is to measure the UV power-spectral break timescale from long light curves and compare it with the 7-day value assumed for this mass.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that a two-band UV photometry mission with a ~30-cm aperture can perform high-cadence (~0.1-1 day) continuum reverberation mapping of nearby AGN at $z<1$, and that the FUV-to-NUV time delays thus measured probe accretion-disk sizes and temperature profiles. The paper supports this with mock light curves generated from a lamppost reprocessing model: a point-like corona irradiates the disk, the disk re-emits in the UV, and the FUV light leads the NUV light by a wavelength-dependent lag. For a $10^9\,M_\odot$ black hole, daily sampling recovers the lag; for $10^8\,M_\odot$, sampling at ~0.1-day cadence over ~180 days is required. The same mission concept is extended to tidal disruption events, where early two-band UV follow-up can constrain the origin of the UV/optical emission and distinguish TDEs (constant blue color) from supernovae (progressive reddening), and to repeating nuclear transients, where UV quasi-periodic eruptions may become detectable.

Load-bearing premise

The feasibility argument stands on the assumption that the simulated broken-power-law driving signal, with break timescales of 86 days and 7 days for the two black-hole masses, captures how real AGN ultraviolet light actually varies; the paper states that this driving signal is not an observable quantity.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • For $10^9\,M_\odot$ AGN, daily sampling recovers the FUV-to-NUV continuum lag; for $10^8\,M_\odot$ AGN, ~0.1-day cadence over roughly 180 days is needed.
  • When three UV bands are used (FUV, NUV, and the ULTRASAT band), detecting lags between individual UV bands requires ~0.1-day cadence.
  • Within $z<0.5$, there are about 151 AGN brighter than 17th magnitude in the SDSS u band, giving a substantial sample for UV reverberation mapping.
  • The projected sensitivity of $m_{AB}\sim21$-$22$ mag lets QUVIK reach type I AGN and quasars out to $z\sim1$, with higher-mass and higher-accretion sources favored.
  • Fast repointing (<20 min) enables early TDE UV detection, and two-band color monitoring distinguishes constant-blue TDEs from reddening supernovae.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the lag-recovery claims hold, the same 0.1-day FUV/NUV monitoring would produce long, evenly sampled UV light curves that directly measure the power-spectral shape of AGN UV variability, turning the paper's unobservable driving-signal assumption into a testable observable.
  • A sample of roughly 150 bright AGN with measured UV continuum lags would give the first statistical test of whether the factor-of-~3 disk-size discrepancy seen in optical reverberation mapping persists in the FUV/NUV bands, discriminating between standard thin disks and alternatives such as slim or puffy disks.
  • The cadence prescription could be checked against archival Swift UVOT light curves of bright AGN before launch: for the $10^9\,M_\odot$ case, existing ~1-day-cadence UV data should already show a measurable FUV-to-NUV lag if the model is right.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. This manuscript presents the AGN/nuclear-transient science case for the QUVIK two-band UV photometry mission. It combines thin-disk SED and apparent-magnitude calculations, mock light-curve simulations with the Amoeba lamppost reprocessing code, and DCF/ICCF lag-recovery tests at different cadences for 10^8 and 10^9 solar mass black holes, together with more qualitative discussions of TDEs, changing-look AGN, and repeating nuclear transients. The central quantitative claim, stated in Section 4.1 and the Summary, is that 180-day QUVIK campaigns at about 1 day cadence will recover FUV-NUV continuum lags for 10^9 solar mass AGN, while about 0.1 day cadence is needed for 10^8 solar mass AGN.

Significance. If the feasibility claim is robust, the paper identifies a useful niche: simultaneous FUV/NUV continuum reverberation mapping of bright, low-redshift AGN, complementing single-band ULTRASAT monitoring and later UVEX spectroscopy. The paper is honest about several limitations (the driving signal is unobservable, the band throughput is not yet known, and the exploration is qualitative), and it uses standard lag-estimation machinery with bootstrap/MCMC uncertainties. These strengths make the paper a reasonable mission-planning input. However, the headline cadence requirements are tied to fixed, unvaried model assumptions, so the practical significance of the paper is currently contingent on a sensitivity analysis that is not presented.

major comments (4)
  1. [§4.1, Figs. 5–6] The paper never defines a quantitative success criterion for a 'recoverable' or 'sufficient' cadence. Fig. 6 reports measured lags with 1-sigma error bars, but no threshold (for example, lag uncertainty smaller than some fraction of the true lag, or a detection probability from the bootstrap/MCMC distributions) is stated. As a result, statements such as 'the time lags ... may be realized with daily cadence' in §4.1 and the Summary's binary 1-day/0.1-day requirement cannot be evaluated from the figures alone. I ask the authors to specify the criterion used to declare a cadence sufficient and to quote the corresponding uncertainties at the adopted threshold.
  2. [§4.1 (driving-signal model)] The cadence conclusions are locked to an unobservable driving-signal model. The text explicitly states that the broken-power-law driving signal 'is not an observable quantity,' with break timescales of 86 and 7 days fixed by the McHardy relation and a fixed f^-1/f^-2 shape. For the 10^9 solar mass case, the lag-carrying frequencies sampled by a ~3-day lag at daily cadence lie roughly 5-40 times above the assumed break frequency, deep in the f^-2 tail, so the available high-frequency variance is almost directly proportional to the assumed break timescale and sensitive to the tail slope. A break one decade shorter or a steeper tail, both plausible given current UV/optical PSD constraints, would suppress this variance and could push the required cadence below the quoted values, while a flatter PSD would make the claim easier; the failure is therefore not directionally protected. The paper also keeps the corona height fixed at 6 r_g and does not vary the reprocessing geometry. I request a sensitivity test over the PSD break time, high-frequency slope, and amplitude, or at least a lag-injection test at fixed variance, before the cadence requirements are presented as feasibility statements.
  3. [§4.1 and §2 (noise and scheduling model)] The simulation treats cadence as a free parameter and adds 2% Poisson noise, corresponding to S/N = 100, but does not include the actual QUVIK band throughput, exposure times, sky background, or the visibility pattern of the Sun-synchronous low-Earth orbit. Section 2 states a 21.5 AB magnitude sensitivity at S/N = 5 in one orbit and a 0.1-day cadence only for bright sources (m_AB <= 20) with <=10 minute integrations, yet the reverberation-mapping calculations do not check whether the proposed sample can be observed at S/N = 100 per visit, nor whether a 0.1-day cadence is schedulable given the orbit and repointing constraints. Because the abstract and Summary present the cadence values as an observational strategy, this consistency check is load-bearing rather than cosmetic.
  4. [Data availability statement] The simulation results behind Figs. 5 and 6 are not reproducible from the manuscript: there is no explicit PSD formula or normalization, no seed or parameter file, and the data availability statement says the data 'will be made available upon request.' At minimum, the authors should include the broken-power-law parameters, the transfer-function inputs, and the noise realization procedure in an appendix, and ideally archive the light curves and code with a persistent identifier.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§4.1] The text 'the time lags between the NUV, FUV1, and FUV2 bands' uses the wrong band names; the simulation bands are FUV, NUV1, and NUV2, and the sentence should be corrected.
  2. [§4.1] The band nomenclature should be clarified early: NUV1 at 260 nm is described as the ULTRASAT band and NUV2 at 325 nm as the QUVIK NUV band, but Fig. 5 and Fig. 6 then emphasize FUV-NUV2 lags. A sentence stating which pairs are actually observable by QUVIK alone would avoid confusion.
  3. [§4.1] The paper says 2% uncertainty is added 'assuming sources are detected at S/N 100 and higher.' For a red-noise light curve, the total measurement uncertainty is not set by Poisson noise alone; the wording should distinguish photon noise from the variance of the driving signal.
  4. [§4.2 and Fig. 9] There are several typos: 'unaffecred' should be 'unaffected', 'complimented' should be 'complemented', and the Fig. 9 caption contains 'constraing' for 'constraining'.
  5. [Fig. 8 caption] The caption reads 'We fix the SMBH mass to M = 10^7 M_sun Different red lines...' and needs a missing period or semicolon after 'M_sun'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the §4.1 cadence claims are outputs of a self-contained lamppost-reprocessing simulation; only a minor, non-load-bearing self-citation to a companion paper is present.

full rationale

The central feasibility claim — that roughly 1-day cadence suffices for 10^9 M_sun AGN and roughly 0.1-day cadence with about 180-day campaigns is needed for 10^8 M_sun — is produced by the Amoeba simulation described in §4.1, not fitted to data. The paper fixes model inputs (Schwarzschild SMBH masses 10^8/10^9 M_sun, Eddington ratio 0.1, z=0.03, corona height 6 r_g, a broken-power-law driving PSD with McHardy-relation break timescales of 86 and 7 days, transfer functions from Cackett et al. 2007, and 2% Poisson noise) and then measures DCF/ICCF lags from the mock light curves. The lag recovery is benchmarked against the mean transfer-function lags, so the output is not equivalent to the input by construction. The fact that the driving PSD is explicitly stated to be unobservable (“this driving signal is not an observable quantity”) makes the cadence conclusions model-dependent, but this is a robustness/sensitivity concern rather than a definitional reduction. The only self-citation of note is in the “QUVIK observational strategy” paragraph, where the 10^7 M_sun cadence/duration guidance and the roughly 151-source SDSS count are imported from the authors' companion paper Zajaček et al. 2024 (ref. 5); this is a published companion analysis and is not load-bearing for the new 10^8/10^9 simulation in Figs. 5–6. Therefore no significant circularity is found.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new physical entities are introduced. The paper's quantitative claims depend on several hand-chosen model parameters and on the reprocessing model being correct, which are listed above.

free parameters (5)
  • Eddington ratio dot{m} = 0.1
    Chosen for the simulated AGN in Section 4.1; sets the disk temperature profile and flux levels used to draw all cadence conclusions.
  • Viewing inclination i = 20 deg
    Chosen in Section 4.1; affects the skew of the transfer functions and hence the recovered lags.
  • Corona height = 6 r_g
    Chosen in Section 4.1; determines the geometry of lamppost reprocessing and the magnitude of interband lags.
  • Photometric noise = 2 percent
    Assumed in Section 4.1, corresponding to SNR=100; higher noise would worsen lag recovery.
  • Light-curve length = 180 days
    Fixed in Section 4.1 for all mock observations; the paper notes that shorter campaigns may be sufficient for low-mass systems.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The UV continuum of type 1 AGN is dominated by thermal emission of a standard thin accretion disk and responds to a central driving signal via lamppost reprocessing.
    Section 4.1 and Fig. 4; the entire reverberation-mapping feasibility analysis assumes this geometry.
  • domain assumption The AGN driving signal follows a broken power-law PSD with slopes -1 and -2 and a break timescale from the McHardy relation.
    Section 4.1, with the paper noting that the driving signal is not observable; if the PSD is different, cadence requirements change.
  • domain assumption The disk transfer functions of Cackett et al. (2007) correctly describe the wavelength-dependent response of the disk.
    Section 4.1; the expected lags used as ground truth are computed from these transfer functions.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of High-cadence observations of galactic nuclei by the future two-band UV-photometry mission QUVIK." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CA7VWF5R

@misc{pith2026250119365,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: High-cadence observations of galactic nuclei by the future two-band UV-photometry mission QUVIK},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CA7VWF5R}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2501.19365}
}
abstract

The Quick Ultra-VIolet Kilonova surveyor (QUVIK), a two-band UV space telescope approved for funding as a Czech national science and technology mission, will focus on detecting early UV light of kilonovae (Werner et al., 2024). In addition, it will study the UV emission of stars and stellar systems (Krti\v{c}ka et al., 2024) as well as the intense and variable emission of active galactic nuclei (AGN) or galactic nuclei activated by tidal disruption events (Zaja\v{c}ek et al., 2024). In this contribution, we describe the role of this small ($\sim 30$-cm diameter) UV telescope for studying bright, nearby AGN. With its NUV and FUV bands, the telescope will perform high-cadence ($\sim 0.1$-$1$ day) two-band photometric monitoring of nearby AGN ($z<1$), which will allow us to probe accretion disk sizes/temperature profiles via photometric reverberation mapping. Thanks to its versatility, QUVIK will be able to perform a moderately fast repointing ($<20$ min) to target candidates for tidal disruption events (TDEs). Early detection of the UV emission following a TDE optical flare, in combination with the subsequent two-band UV monitoring performed simultaneously with other observatories, will enable us to infer the time delay (or its lack of) between the optical, UV, and X-ray emission. In combination with theoretical models, it will be possible to shed more light on the origin of the UV/optical emission of TDEs. Furthermore, the two-band monitoring of nuclear transients will be beneficial in distinguishing between TDEs (nearly constant blue colour) and supernovae (progressive reddening) in the era of intensive wide-field surveys.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

160 extracted references · 71 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    J. L. Linsky , `` UV astronomy throughout the ages: a historical perspective ,'' 363 , 101 (2018)

    2018

  2. [2]

    Kurf \"u rst , O

    P. Kurf \"u rst , O. Pejcha , and J. Krti c ka , `` Supernova explosions interacting with aspherical circumstellar material: implications for light curves, spectral line profiles, and polarization ,'' 642 , A214 (2020)

    2020

  3. [3]

    Werner , J

    N. Werner , J. R \' pa , C. Th \"o ne , et al. , `` Science with a Small Two-Band UV-Photometry Mission I: Mission Description and Follow-up Observations of Stellar Transients ,'' 220 , 11 (2024)

    2024

  4. [4]

    Krti c ka , J

    J. Krti c ka , J. Ben \'a c ek , J. Budaj , et al. , `` Science with a Small Two-Band UV-Photometry Mission II: Observations of Stars and Stellar Systems ,'' 220 , 24 (2024)

    2024

  5. [5]

    Zaja c ek , B

    M. Zaja c ek , B. Czerny , V. K. Jaiswal , et al. , `` Science with a Small Two-Band UV-Photometry Mission III: Active Galactic Nuclei and Nuclear Transients ,'' 220 , 29 (2024)

    2024

  6. [6]

    R. C. Bless and A. D. Code , `` Ultraviolet Astronomy ,'' 10 , 197 (1972)

    1972

  7. [7]

    Boggess , F

    A. Boggess , F. A. Carr , D. C. Evans , et al. , `` The IUE spacecraft and instrumentation ,'' 275 , 372--377 (1978)

    1978

  8. [8]

    Kondo , A

    Y. Kondo , A. Boggess , and S. P. Maran , `` Astrophysical contributions of the International Ultraviolet Explorer. ,'' 27 , 397--420 (1989)

    1989

Show all 160 references
  1. [9]

    K. G. Metzroth , C. A. Onken , and B. M. Peterson , `` The Mass of the Central Black Hole in the Seyfert Galaxy NGC 4151 ,'' 647 , 901--909 (2006)

    2006

  2. [10]

    Collin-Souffrin , J

    S. Collin-Souffrin , J. E. Dyson , J. C. McDowell , et al. , `` The environment of active galactic nuclei - I. A two-component broad emission line model. ,'' 232 , 539--550 (1988)

    1988

  3. [11]

    Maoz , H

    D. Maoz , H. Netzer , B. M. Peterson , et al. , `` Variations of the Ultraviolet Fe II and Balmer Continuum Emission in the Seyfert Galaxy NGC 5548 ,'' 404 , 576 (1993)

    1993

  4. [12]

    D. C. Martin , J. Fanson , D. Schiminovich , et al. , `` The Galaxy Evolution Explorer: A Space Ultraviolet Survey Mission ,'' 619 , L1--L6 (2005)

    2005

  5. [13]

    G. T. Richards , M. Lacy , L. J. Storrie-Lombardi , et al. , `` Spectral Energy Distributions and Multiwavelength Selection of Type 1 Quasars ,'' 166 , 470--497 (2006)

    2006

  6. [14]

    Modzelewska , B

    J. Modzelewska , B. Czerny , K. Hryniewicz , et al. , `` SALT long-slit spectroscopy of CTS C30.10: two-component Mg II line ,'' 570 , A53 (2014)

    2014

  7. [15]

    Zaja c ek , B

    M. Zaja c ek , B. Czerny , M. L. Martinez-Aldama , et al. , `` Time-delay Measurement of Mg II Broad-line Response for the Highly Accreting Quasar HE 0413-4031: Implications for the Mg II-based Radius-Luminosity Relation ,'' 896 , 146 (2020)

    2020

  8. [16]

    P. W. A. Roming , T. E. Kennedy , K. O. Mason , et al. , `` The Swift Ultra-Violet/Optical Telescope ,'' 120 , 95--142 (2005)

    2005

  9. [17]

    M. M. Fausnaugh , K. D. Denney , A. J. Barth , et al. , `` Space Telescope and Optical Reverberation Mapping Project. III. Optical Continuum Emission and Broadband Time Delays in NGC 5548 ,'' 821 , 56 (2016)

    2016

  10. [18]

    E. M. Cackett , M. C. Bentz , and E. Kara , `` Reverberation mapping of active galactic nuclei: from X-ray corona to dusty torus ,'' iScience 24 , 102557 (2021)

    2021

  11. [19]

    E. M. Cackett , C.-Y. Chiang , I. McHardy , et al. , `` Accretion Disk Reverberation with Hubble Space Telescope Observations of NGC 4593: Evidence for Diffuse Continuum Lags ,'' 857 , 53 (2018)

    2018

  12. [20]

    P. A. Evans , C. J. Nixon , S. Campana , et al. , `` Monthly quasi-periodic eruptions from repeated stellar disruption by a massive black hole ,'' Nature Astronomy 7 , 1368--1375 (2023)

    2023

  13. [21]

    Guolo , D

    M. Guolo , D. R. Pasham , M. Zaja c ek , et al. , `` X-ray eruptions every 22 days from the nucleus of a nearby galaxy ,'' Nature Astronomy 8 , 347--358 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    Pasham , E

    D. Pasham , E. Coughlin , C. Nixon , et al. , `` Repeated Partial Tidal Disruptions and Quasi-Periodic Eruptions in SwJ023017.0+283603 ,'' arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2411.05948 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  15. [23]

    Hern \'a ndez-Garc \' a , J

    L. Hern \'a ndez-Garc \' a , J. Chakraborty , P. S \'a nchez-S \'a ez , et al. , `` Discovery of extreme quasi-periodic eruptions in a newly accreting massive black hole ,'' Nature Astronomy (2025)

    2025

  16. [24]

    Chakraborty , P

    J. Chakraborty , P. Kosec , E. Kara , et al. , `` Rapidly varying ionization features in a Quasi-periodic Eruption: a homologous expansion model for the spectroscopic evolution ,'' arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2504.07167 (2025)

    2025 arXiv

  17. [25]

    G. C. Dewangan , P. Tripathi , I. E. Papadakis , et al. , `` AstroSat/UVIT observations of IC 4329A: constraining the accretion disc inner radius ,'' 504 , 4015--4023 (2021)

    2021

  18. [26]

    Kumar , G

    S. Kumar , G. C. Dewangan , K. P. Singh , et al. , `` Far-ultraviolet Spectroscopy of Active Galactic Nuclei with ASTROSAT/UVIT ,'' 950 , 90 (2023)

    2023

  19. [27]

    S tolc , M

    M. S tolc , M. Zaja c ek , B. Czerny , et al. , `` Spectral energy distribution profiles from AGN accretion disc in multigap set-up ,'' 522 , 2869--2884 (2023)

    2023

  20. [28]

    Ben-Ami , Y

    S. Ben-Ami , Y. Shvartzvald , E. Waxman , et al. , `` The scientific payload of the Ultraviolet Transient Astronomy Satellite (ULTRASAT) ,'' in Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2022: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray , J.-W. A. den Herder , S. Nikzad , and K. Nakazawa , Eds., Socie...

    2022

  21. [29]

    Shvartzvald , E

    Y. Shvartzvald , E. Waxman , A. Gal-Yam , et al. , `` ULTRASAT: A wide-field time-domain UV space telescope ,'' arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2304.14482 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  22. [30]

    Werner , J

    N. Werner , J. R \' pa , F. M \"u nz , et al. , `` Quick Ultra-VIolet Kilonova surveyor (QUVIK) ,'' in Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2022: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray , J.-W. A. den Herder , S. Nikzad , and K. Nakazawa , Eds., Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engin...

    2022

  23. [31]

    National Academies of Sciences and Medicine, Engineering , Pathways to Discovery in Astronomy and Astrophysics for the 2020s (2021)

    2021

  24. [32]

    J. M. Lattimer and D. N. Schramm , `` Black-Hole-Neutron-Star Collisions ,'' 192 , L145 (1974)

    1974

  25. [33]

    Wanajo , Y

    S. Wanajo , Y. Sekiguchi , N. Nishimura , et al. , `` Production of All the r-process Nuclides in the Dynamical Ejecta of Neutron Star Mergers ,'' 789 , L39 (2014)

    2014

  26. [34]

    Li and B

    L.-X. Li and B. Paczy \'n ski , `` Transient Events from Neutron Star Mergers ,'' 507 , L59--L62 (1998)

    1998

  27. [35]

    S. R. Kulkarni , `` Modeling Supernova-like Explosions Associated with Gamma-ray Bursts with Short Durations ,'' arXiv e-prints , arXiv:astro ph/0510256 (2005)

    2005

  28. [36]

    B. D. Metzger , G. Mart \' nez-Pinedo , S. Darbha , et al. , `` Electromagnetic counterparts of compact object mergers powered by the radioactive decay of r-process nuclei ,'' 406 , 2650--2662 (2010)

    2010

  29. [37]

    B. D. Metzger , `` Kilonovae ,'' Living Reviews in Relativity 23 , 1 (2019)

    2019

  30. [38]

    B. P. Abbott , R. Abbott , T. D. Abbott , et al. , `` Prospects for observing and localizing gravitational-wave transients with Advanced LIGO, Advanced Virgo and KAGRA ,'' Living Reviews in Relativity 23 , 3 (2020)

    2020

  31. [39]

    B. P. Abbott , R. Abbott , T. D. Abbott , et al. , `` GW170817: Observation of Gravitational Waves from a Binary Neutron Star Inspiral ,'' Physical Review Letters 119 , 161101 (2017)

    2017

  32. [40]

    P. A. Evans , S. B. Cenko , J. A. Kennea , et al. , `` Swift and NuSTAR observations of GW170817: Detection of a blue kilonova ,'' Science 358 , 1565--1570 (2017)

    2017

  33. [41]

    G. P. Lamb , N. R. Tanvir , A. J. Levan , et al. , `` Short GRB 160821B: A Reverse Shock, a Refreshed Shock, and a Well-sampled Kilonova ,'' 883 , 48 (2019)

    2019

  34. [42]

    Troja , A

    E. Troja , A. J. Castro-Tirado , J. Becerra Gonz \'a lez , et al. , `` The afterglow and kilonova of the short GRB 160821B ,'' 489 , 2104--2116 (2019)

    2019

  35. [43]

    B. P. Abbott , R. Abbott , T. D. Abbott , et al. , `` Multi-messenger Observations of a Binary Neutron Star Merger ,'' The Astrophysical Journal Letters 848 , L12 (2017)

    2017

  36. [44]

    J. C. Rastinejad , B. P. Gompertz , A. J. Levan , et al. , `` A kilonova following a long-duration gamma-ray burst at 350 Mpc ,'' 612 , 223--227 (2022)

    2022

  37. [45]

    D. B. Fox , D. A. Frail , P. A. Price , et al. , `` The afterglow of GRB 050709 and the nature of the short-hard -ray bursts ,'' 437 , 845--850 (2005)

    2005

  38. [46]

    Hjorth , D

    J. Hjorth , D. Watson , J. P. U. Fynbo , et al. , `` The optical afterglow of the short -ray burst GRB 050709 ,'' 437 , 859--861 (2005)

    2005

  39. [47]

    Z.-P. Jin , K. Hotokezaka , X. Li , et al. , `` The Macronova in GRB 050709 and the GRB-macronova connection ,'' Nature Communications 7 , 12898 (2016)

    2016

  40. [48]

    Gal-Yam , D

    A. Gal-Yam , D. B. Fox , P. A. Price , et al. , `` A novel explosive process is required for the -ray burst GRB 060614 ,'' 444 , 1053--1055 (2006)

    2006

  41. [49]

    Yang , Z.-P

    B. Yang , Z.-P. Jin , X. Li , et al. , `` A possible macronova in the late afterglow of the long-short burst GRB 060614 ,'' Nature Communications 6 , 7323 (2015)

    2015

  42. [50]

    N. R. Tanvir , A. J. Levan , A. S. Fruchter , et al. , `` A `kilonova' associated with the short-duration -ray burst GRB 130603B ,'' 500 , 547--549 (2013)

    2013

  43. [51]

    B. D. Metzger , T. A. Thompson , and E. Quataert , `` A Magnetar Origin for the Kilonova Ejecta in GW170817 ,'' 856 , 101 (2018)

    2018

  44. [52]

    Curtis , P

    S. Curtis , P. Bosch , P. M \"o sta , et al. , `` Outflows from Short-Lived Neutron-Star Merger Remnants Can Produce a Blue Kilonova ,'' arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2305.07738 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  45. [53]

    Combi and D

    L. Combi and D. M. Siegel , `` Jets from neutron-star merger remnants and massive blue kilonovae ,'' arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2303.12284 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  46. [54]

    Nakar and T

    E. Nakar and T. Piran , `` The Observable Signatures of GRB Cocoons ,'' The Astrophysical Journal 834 , 28 (2017)

    2017

  47. [55]

    A. L. Piro and J. A. Kollmeier , `` Evidence for Cocoon Emission from the Early Light Curve of SSS17a ,'' 855 , 103 (2018)

    2018

  48. [56]

    Gottlieb , E

    O. Gottlieb , E. Nakar , and T. Piran , `` The cocoon emission - an electromagnetic counterpart to gravitational waves from neutron star mergers ,'' Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 473 , 576--584 (2018)

    2018

  49. [57]

    B. D. Metzger , A. Bauswein , S. Goriely , et al. , `` Neutron-powered precursors of kilonovae ,'' Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 446 , 1115--1120 (2015)

    2015

  50. [58]

    S. R. Kulkarni , F. A. Harrison , B. W. Grefenstette , et al. , `` Science with the Ultraviolet Explorer (UVEX) ,'' arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2111.15608 (2021)

    2021 arXiv

  51. [59]

    Dorsman , G

    B. Dorsman , G. Raaijmakers , S. B. Cenko , et al. , `` Prospects of Gravitational-wave Follow-up through a Wide-field Ultraviolet Satellite: A Dorado Case Study ,'' 944 , 126 (2023)

    2023

  52. [60]

    Kasen , R

    D. Kasen , R. Fern \'a ndez , and B. D. Metzger , `` Kilonova light curves from the disc wind outflows of compact object mergers ,'' 450 , 1777--1786 (2015)

    2015

  53. [61]

    Fern \'a ndez and B

    R. Fern \'a ndez and B. D. Metzger , `` Electromagnetic Signatures of Neutron Star Mergers in the Advanced LIGO Era ,'' Annual Review of Nuclear and Particle Science 66 , 23--45 (2016)

    2016

  54. [62]

    Bucciantini , B

    N. Bucciantini , B. D. Metzger , T. A. Thompson , et al. , `` Short gamma-ray bursts with extended emission from magnetar birth: jet formation and collimation ,'' 419 , 1537--1545 (2012)

    2012

  55. [63]

    Y.-W. Yu , B. Zhang , and H. Gao , `` Bright ``Merger-nova'' from the Remnant of a Neutron Star Binary Merger: A Signature of a Newly Born, Massive, Millisecond Magnetar ,'' 776 , L40 (2013)

    2013

  56. [64]

    B. D. Metzger and A. L. Piro , `` Optical and X-ray emission from stable millisecond magnetars formed from the merger of binary neutron stars ,'' 439 , 3916--3930 (2014)

    2014

  57. [65]

    J. P. U. Fynbo , D. Watson , C. C. Th \"o ne , et al. , `` No supernovae associated with two long-duration -ray bursts ,'' 444 , 1047--1049 (2006)

    2006

  58. [66]

    J. P. Norris , `` Implications of the Lag-Luminosity Relationship for Unified Gamma-Ray Burst Paradigms ,'' 579 , 386--403 (2002)

    2002

  59. [67]

    J. P. Norris and J. T. Bonnell , `` Short Gamma-Ray Bursts with Extended Emission ,'' 643 , 266--275 (2006)

    2006

  60. [68]

    Gehrels , J

    N. Gehrels , J. P. Norris , S. D. Barthelmy , et al. , `` A new -ray burst classification scheme from GRB060614 ,'' 444 , 1044--1046 (2006)

    2006

  61. [69]

    Troja , C

    E. Troja , C. L. Fryer , B. O'Connor , et al. , `` A nearby long gamma-ray burst from a merger of compact objects ,'' 612 , 228--231 (2022)

    2022

  62. [70]

    A. J. Levan , B. P. Gompertz , O. S. Salafia , et al. , `` Heavy-element production in a compact object merger observed by JWST ,'' 626 , 737--741 (2024)

    2024

  63. [71]

    Czerny and M

    B. Czerny and M. Elvis , `` Constraints on Quasar Accretion Disks from the Optical/Ultraviolet/Soft X-Ray Big Bump ,'' 321 , 305 (1987)

    1987

  64. [72]

    N. I. Shakura and R. A. Sunyaev , `` Black holes in binary systems. Observational appearance. ,'' 24 , 337--355 (1973)

    1973

  65. [73]

    I. D. Novikov and K. S. Thorne , `` Astrophysics of black holes. ,'' in Black Holes (Les Astres Occlus) , C. Dewitt and B. S. Dewitt , Eds., 343--450 (1973)

    1973

  66. [74]

    Kaspi , `` Measuring supermassive black holes via reverberation mapping in the UV ,'' 363 , 82 (2018)

    S. Kaspi , `` Measuring supermassive black holes via reverberation mapping in the UV ,'' 363 , 82 (2018)

    2018

  67. [75]

    E. M. Cackett, M. C. Bentz, and E. Kara, ``Reverberation mapping of active galactic nuclei: From x-ray corona to dusty torus,'' iScience 24 (6), 102557 (2021)

    2021

  68. [76]

    A. B. Kova c evi \'c , V. Radovi \'c , D. Ili \'c , et al. , `` The LSST Era of Supermassive Black Hole Accretion Disk Reverberation Mapping ,'' 262 , 49 (2022)

    2022

  69. [77]

    N. I. Shakura and R. A. Sunyaev , `` Reprint of 1973A&A....24..337S. Black holes in binary systems. Observational appearance. ,'' Astronomy and Astrophysics 500 , 33--51 (1973)

    1973

  70. [78]

    D. N. Page and K. S. Thorne , `` Disk-Accretion onto a Black Hole. Time-Averaged Structure of Accretion Disk ,'' 191 , 499--506 (1974)

    1974

  71. [79]

    Wang and Y.-Y

    J.-M. Wang and Y.-Y. Zhou , `` Self-similar Solution of Optically Thick Advection-dominated Flows ,'' 516 , 420--424 (1999)

    1999

  72. [80]

    M. A. Abramowicz and P. C. Fragile , `` Foundations of Black Hole Accretion Disk Theory ,'' Living Reviews in Relativity 16 , 1 (2013)

    2013

  73. [81]

    C. R. Evans and J. F. Hawley , `` Simulation of Magnetohydrodynamic Flows: A Constrained Transport Model ,'' 332 , 659 (1988)

    1988

  74. [82]

    Lan c ov \'a , D

    D. Lan c ov \'a , D. Abarca , W. Klu \'z niak , et al. , `` Puffy Accretion Disks: Sub-Eddington, Optically Thick, and Stable ,'' 884 , L37 (2019)

    2019

  75. [83]

    Wielgus , D

    M. Wielgus , D. Lan c ov \'a , O. Straub , et al. , `` Observational properties of puffy discs: radiative GRMHD spectra of mildly sub-Eddington accretion ,'' 514 , 780--789 (2022)

    2022

  76. [84]

    Kaaz , M

    N. Kaaz , M. T. P. Liska , J. Jacquemin-Ide , et al. , `` Nozzle Shocks, Disk Tearing, and Streamers Drive Rapid Accretion in 3D GRMHD Simulations of Warped Thin Disks ,'' 955 , 72 (2023)

    2023

  77. [85]

    Secunda , Y.-F

    A. Secunda , Y.-F. Jiang , and J. E. Greene , `` Simulating X-Ray Reverberation in the Ultraviolet-emitting Regions of Active Galactic Nuclei Accretion Disks with Three-dimensional Multifrequency Radiation Magnetohydrodynamic Simulations ,'' 965 , L29 (2024)

    2024

  78. [86]

    Jiang , P

    Y.-F. Jiang , P. J. Green , J. E. Greene , et al. , `` Detection of Time Lags between Quasar Continuum Emission Bands Based On Pan-STARRS Light Curves ,'' 836 , 186 (2017)

    2017

  79. [87]

    Kumari , G

    K. Kumari , G. C. Dewangan , I. E. Papadakis , et al. , `` Contrasting X-ray/UV time-lags in Seyfert 1 galaxies NGC 4593 and NGC 7469 using AstroSat observations ,'' 521 , 4109--4121 (2023)

    2023

  80. [88]

    Kumari , G

    K. Kumari , G. C. Dewangan , I. E. Papadakis , et al. , `` Detection of X-ray/UV delay in NGC 4051 using AstroSat observations ,'' 527 , 5668--5674 (2024)

    2024

  81. [89]

    Papoutsis , I

    M. Papoutsis , I. E. Papadakis , C. Panagiotou , et al. , `` X-ray reverberation as an explanation for UV/optical variability in nearby Seyferts ,'' 691 , A60 (2024)

    2024

  82. [90]

    De Rosa , B

    G. De Rosa , B. M. Peterson , J. Ely , et al. , `` Space Telescope and Optical Reverberation Mapping Project.I. Ultraviolet Observations of the Seyfert 1 Galaxy NGC 5548 with the Cosmic Origins Spectrograph on Hubble Space Telescope ,'' 806 , 128 (2015)

    2015

  83. [91]

    Kara , M

    E. Kara , M. Mehdipour , G. A. Kriss , et al. , `` AGN STORM 2. I. First results: A Change in the Weather of Mrk 817 ,'' 922 , 151 (2021)

    2021

  84. [92]

    Best , M

    H. Best , M. O'Dowd , J. Fagin , et al. , `` Amoeba: An AGN Model of Optical Emissions Beyond steady-state Accretion discs ,'' arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2410.19630 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  85. [93]

    S. G. Sergeev , V. T. Doroshenko , Y. V. Golubinskiy , et al. , `` Lag-Luminosity Relationship for Interband Lags between Variations in B, V, R, and I Bands in Active Galactic Nuclei ,'' 622 , 129--135 (2005)

    2005

  86. [94]

    E. M. Cackett , K. Horne , and H. Winkler , `` Testing thermal reprocessing in active galactic nuclei accretion discs ,'' 380 , 669--682 (2007)

    2007

  87. [95]

    C. M. Urry and P. Padovani , `` Unified Schemes for Radio-Loud Active Galactic Nuclei ,'' 107 , 803 (1995)

    1995

  88. [96]

    I. M. McHardy, E. Koerding, C. Knigge, et al. , ``Active galactic nuclei as scaled-up galactic black holes,'' Nature 444 , 730--732 (2006)

    2006

  89. [97]

    R. A. Edelson and J. H. Krolik , `` The Discrete Correlation Function: A New Method for Analyzing Unevenly Sampled Variability Data ,'' 333 , 646 (1988)

    1988

  90. [98]

    Peterson, I

    B. Peterson, I. Wanders, K. Horne, et al. , ``On uncertainties in cross‐correlation lags and the reality of wavelength‐dependent continuum lags in active galactic nuclei,'' Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific 110 , 660–670 (1998)

    1998

  91. [99]

    M. Sun , C. J. Grier , and B. M. Peterson , `` PyCCF: Python Cross Correlation Function for reverberation mapping studies .'' Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1805.032 (2018)

    2018

  92. [100]

    K. T. Korista and M. R. Goad , `` Quantifying the impact of variable BLR diffuse continuum contributions on measured continuum interband delays ,'' 489 , 5284--5300 (2019)

    2019

  93. [101]

    J. H. H. Chan , M. Millon , V. Bonvin , et al. , `` Twisted quasar light curves: implications for continuum reverberation mapping of accretion disks ,'' 636 , A52 (2020)

    2020

  94. [102]

    J. G. Hills , `` Possible power source of Seyfert galaxies and QSOs ,'' 254 , 295--298 (1975)

    1975

  95. [103]

    M. J. Rees , `` Tidal disruption of stars by black holes of 10 ^ 6 - 10 ^ 8 solar masses in nearby galaxies ,'' 333 , 523--528 (1988)

    1988

  96. [104]

    Lodato , A

    G. Lodato , A. R. King , and J. E. Pringle , `` Stellar disruption by a supermassive black hole: is the light curve really proportional to t ^ -5/3 ? ,'' 392 , 332--340 (2009)

    2009

  97. [105]

    Z. V. Kov \'a cs-Stermeczky and J. Vink \'o , `` Fitting optical light curves of Tidal Disruption Events with TiDE ,'' arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2309.06935 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  98. [106]

    D. R. Pasham , M. Zaja c ek , C. J. Nixon , et al. , `` Lense-Thirring precession after a supermassive black hole disrupts a star ,'' 630 , 325--328 (2024)

    2024

  99. [107]

    Zajacek and A

    M. Zajacek and A. Tursunov , `` The Electric Charge of Black Holes: Is It Really Always Negligible ,'' The Observatory 139 , 231--236 (2019)

    2019

  100. [108]

    Zaja c ek , A

    M. Zaja c ek , A. Tursunov , A. Eckart , et al. , `` Constraining the charge of the Galactic centre black hole ,'' in Journal of Physics Conference Series , Journal of Physics Conference Series 1258 , 012031, IOP (2019)

    2019

  101. [109]

    Zaja c ek , A

    M. Zaja c ek , A. Tursunov , A. Eckart , et al. , `` On the charge of the Galactic centre black hole ,'' 480 , 4408--4423 (2018)

    2018

  102. [110]

    Tursunov , M

    A. Tursunov , M. Zaja c ek , A. Eckart , et al. , `` Effect of Electromagnetic Interaction on Galactic Center Flare Components ,'' 897 , 99 (2020)

    2020

  103. [111]

    Piran , G

    T. Piran , G. Svirski , J. Krolik , et al. , `` Disk Formation Versus Disk Accretion What Powers Tidal Disruption Events? ,'' 806 , 164 (2015)

    2015

  104. [112]

    D. R. Pasham , S. B. Cenko , A. Sadowski , et al. , `` Optical/UV-to-X-Ray Echoes from the Tidal Disruption Flare ASASSN-14li ,'' 837 , L30 (2017)

    2017

  105. [113]

    Wevers , D

    T. Wevers , D. R. Pasham , S. van Velzen , et al. , `` Rapid Accretion State Transitions following the Tidal Disruption Event AT2018fyk ,'' 912 , 151 (2021)

    2021

  106. [114]

    Z. Liu , A. Malyali , M. Krumpe , et al. , `` Deciphering the extreme X-ray variability of the nuclear transient eRASSt J045650.3 - 203750. A likely repeating partial tidal disruption event ,'' 669 , A75 (2023)

    2023

  107. [115]

    Andreoni , M

    I. Andreoni , M. W. Coughlin , D. A. Perley , et al. , `` A very luminous jet from the disruption of a star by a massive black hole ,'' 612 , 430--434 (2022)

    2022

  108. [116]

    Britzen , C

    S. Britzen , C. Fendt , G. Witzel , et al. , `` OJ287: deciphering the `Rosetta stone of blazars ,'' 478 , 3199--3219 (2018)

    2018

  109. [117]

    Britzen , M

    S. Britzen , M. Zaja c ek , Gopal-Krishna , et al. , `` Precession-induced Variability in AGN Jets and OJ 287 ,'' 951 , 106 (2023)

    2023

  110. [118]

    N. C. Stone , E. Vasiliev , M. Kesden , et al. , `` Rates of Stellar Tidal Disruption ,'' 216 , 35 (2020)

    2020

  111. [119]

    Volonteri , P

    M. Volonteri , P. Madau , E. Quataert , et al. , `` The Distribution and Cosmic Evolution of Massive Black Hole Spins ,'' 620 , 69--77 (2005)

    2005

  112. [120]

    Mummery and S

    A. Mummery and S. A. Balbus , `` The spectral evolution of disc dominated tidal disruption events ,'' 492 , 5655--5674 (2020)

    2020

  113. [121]

    Mummery , `` A maximum X-ray luminosity scale of disc-dominated tidal destruction events ,'' 504 , 5144--5154 (2021)

    A. Mummery , `` A maximum X-ray luminosity scale of disc-dominated tidal destruction events ,'' 504 , 5144--5154 (2021)

    2021

  114. [122]

    Musoke , M

    G. Musoke , M. Liska , O. Porth , et al. , `` Disc tearing leads to low and high frequency quasi-periodic oscillations in a GRMHD simulation of a thin accretion disc ,'' 518 , 1656--1671 (2023)

    2023

  115. [123]

    Linial and B

    I. Linial and B. D. Metzger , `` Coupled Disk-star Evolution in Galactic Nuclei and the Lifetimes of QPE Sources ,'' 973 , 101 (2024)

    2024

  116. [124]

    Jana , C

    A. Jana , C. Ricci , M. J. Temple , et al. , `` Investigating Changing-Look Active Galactic Nuclei with Long-term Optical and X-Ray Observations ,'' arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2411.08676 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  117. [125]

    Ricci , E

    C. Ricci , E. Kara , M. Loewenstein , et al. , `` The Destruction and Recreation of the X-Ray Corona in a Changing-look Active Galactic Nucleus ,'' 898 , L1 (2020)

    2020

  118. [126]

    Ricci , M

    C. Ricci , M. Loewenstein , E. Kara , et al. , `` The 450 Day X-Ray Monitoring of the Changing-look AGN 1ES 1927+654 ,'' 255 , 7 (2021)

    2021

  119. [127]

    L. M. Krauth , J. Davelaar , Z. Haiman , et al. , `` Disappearing thermal X-ray emission as a tell-tale signature of merging massive black hole binaries ,'' 526 , 5441--5454 (2023)

    2023

  120. [128]

    M. R. Goad , K. T. Korista , G. De Rosa , et al. , `` Space Telescope and Optical Reverberation Mapping Project. IV. Anomalous Behavior of the Broad Ultraviolet Emission Lines in NGC 5548 ,'' 824 , 11 (2016)

    2016

  121. [129]

    Dehghanian , G

    M. Dehghanian , G. J. Ferland , B. M. Peterson , et al. , `` A Wind-based Unification Model for NGC 5548: Spectral Holidays, Nondisk Emission, and Implications for Changing-look Quasars ,'' 882 , L30 (2019)

    2019

  122. [130]

    Wambsganss, ``Gravitational microlensing,'' Gravitational Lensing: Strong, Weak and Micro , 453–540 (2006)

    J. Wambsganss, ``Gravitational microlensing,'' Gravitational Lensing: Strong, Weak and Micro , 453–540 (2006)

    2006

  123. [131]

    Vernardos , D

    G. Vernardos , D. Sluse , D. Pooley , et al. , `` Microlensing of strongly lensed quasars ,'' arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2312.00931 (2023)

    2023 arXiv

  124. [132]

    Neira , T

    F. Neira , T. Anguita , and G. Vernardos , `` A quasar microlensing light-curve generator for LSST ,'' 495 , 544--553 (2020)

    2020

  125. [133]

    Mediavilla, J

    E. Mediavilla, J. Jiménez-vicente, J. A. Muñoz, et al. , ``Resolving the innermost region of the accretion disk of the lensed quasar q2237+0305 through gravitational microlensing,'' The Astrophysical Journal 814 , L26 (2015)

    2015

  126. [134]

    Ledvina , D

    L. Ledvina , D. Heyrovsk \'y , and M. Dov c iak , `` X-Ray Line Profile Variations during Quasar Microlensing ,'' 863 , 66 (2018)

    2018

  127. [135]

    Best , J

    H. Best , J. Fagin , G. Vernardos , et al. , `` Resolving the vicinity of supermassive black holes with gravitational microlensing ,'' 531 , 1095--1112 (2024)

    2024

  128. [136]

    Fagin , E

    J. Fagin , E. Paic , F. Neira , et al. , `` Predicting High Magnification Events in Microlensed Quasars in the Era of LSST using Recurrent Neural Networks ,'' arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2409.08999 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  129. [137]

    Sniegowska , B

    M. Sniegowska , B. Czerny , E. Bon , et al. , `` Possible mechanism for multiple changing-look phenomena in active galactic nuclei ,'' 641 , A167 (2020)

    2020

  130. [138]

    Sukov \'a , F

    P. Sukov \'a , F. Tombesi , D. R. Pasham , et al. , `` Repeating transients in galactic nuclei: confronting observations with theory ,'' arXiv e-prints , arXiv:2411.04592 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  131. [139]

    T. Ryu , J. Krolik , T. Piran , et al. , `` Tidal Disruptions of Main-sequence Stars. II. Simulation Methodology and Stellar Mass Dependence of the Character of Full Tidal Disruptions ,'' 904 , 99 (2020)

    2020

  132. [140]

    Wevers , E

    T. Wevers , E. R. Coughlin , D. R. Pasham , et al. , `` Live to Die Another Day: The Rebrightening of AT 2018fyk as a Repeating Partial Tidal Disruption Event ,'' 942 , L33 (2023)

    2023

  133. [141]

    A. V. Payne , B. J. Shappee , J. T. Hinkle , et al. , `` ASASSN-14ko is a Periodic Nuclear Transient in ESO 253-G003 ,'' 910 , 125 (2021)

    2021

  134. [142]

    Miniutti , R

    G. Miniutti , R. D. Saxton , M. Giustini , et al. , `` Nine-hour X-ray quasi-periodic eruptions from a low-mass black hole galactic nucleus ,'' 573 , 381--384 (2019)

    2019

  135. [143]

    Arcodia , A

    R. Arcodia , A. Merloni , K. Nandra , et al. , `` X-ray quasi-periodic eruptions from two previously quiescent galaxies ,'' 592 , 704--707 (2021)

    2021

  136. [144]

    \'S niegowska , M

    M. \'S niegowska , M. Grz e dzielski , B. Czerny , et al. , `` Modified models of radiation pressure instability applied to 10, 10 ^ 5 , and 10 ^ 7 M _ accreting black holes ,'' 672 , A19 (2023)

    2023

  137. [145]

    Sukov \'a , M

    P. Sukov \'a , M. Zaja c ek , V. Witzany , et al. , `` Stellar Transits across a Magnetized Accretion Torus as a Mechanism for Plasmoid Ejection ,'' 917 , 43 (2021)

    2021

  138. [146]

    Kejriwal , V

    S. Kejriwal , V. Witzany , M. Zaja c ek , et al. , `` Repeating nuclear transients as candidate electromagnetic counterparts of LISA extreme mass ratio inspirals ,'' 532 , 2143--2158 (2024)

    2024

  139. [147]

    Linial and B

    I. Linial and B. D. Metzger , `` EMRI + TDE = QPE: Periodic X-Ray Flares from Star-Disk Collisions in Galactic Nuclei ,'' 957 , 34 (2023)

    2023

  140. [148]

    Franchini , M

    A. Franchini , M. Bonetti , A. Lupi , et al. , `` Quasi-periodic eruptions from impacts between the secondary and a rigidly precessing accretion disc in an extreme mass-ratio inspiral system ,'' 675 , A100 (2023)

    2023

  141. [149]

    Linial and B

    I. Linial and B. Metzger, ``Ultraviolet quasiperiodic eruptions from star–disk collisions in galactic nuclei,'' The Astrophysical Journal Letters 963 , L1 (2024)

    2024

  142. [150]

    Nicholl , D

    M. Nicholl , D. R. Pasham , A. Mummery , et al. , `` Quasi-periodic X-ray eruptions years after a nearby tidal disruption event ,'' 634 , 804--808 (2024)

    2024

  143. [151]

    Britzen , A

    S. Britzen , A. B. Kova c evi \'c , M. Zaja c ek , et al. , `` ICECUBE AGN neutrino candidate PKS 1717+177: dark deflector bends nuclear jet ,'' 535 , 2742--2762 (2024)

    2024

  144. [152]

    Zaja c ek , A

    M. Zaja c ek , A. Eckart , V. Karas , et al. , `` Effect of an isotropic outflow from the Galactic Centre on the bow-shock evolution along the orbit ,'' 455 , 1257--1274 (2016)

    2016

  145. [153]

    Zaja c ek , A

    M. Zaja c ek , A. Araudo , V. Karas , et al. , `` Depletion of Bright Red Giants in the Galactic Center during Its Active Phases ,'' 903 , 140 (2020)

    2020

  146. [154]

    S. E. Hosseini , M. Zaja c ek , A. Eckart , et al. , `` Constraining the accretion flow density profile near Sgr A* using the L'-band emission of the S2 star ,'' 644 , A105 (2020)

    2020

  147. [155]

    Kurf \"u rst , M

    P. Kurf \"u rst , M. Zaja c ek , N. Werner , et al. , `` Red giant jet collisions in galactic nuclei I: 3D hydrodynamical model of a few stellar orbits ,'' 540 , 1586--1607 (2025)

    2025

  148. [156]

    Ivezi \'c , S

    Z . Ivezi \'c , S. M. Kahn , J. A. Tyson , et al. , `` LSST: From Science Drivers to Reference Design and Anticipated Data Products ,'' 873 , 111 (2019)

    2019

  149. [157]

    Shvartzvald , E

    Y. Shvartzvald , E. Waxman , A. Gal-Yam , et al. , `` ULTRASAT: A Wide-field Time-domain UV Space Telescope ,'' 964 , 74 (2024)

    2024

  150. [158]

    E. C. Bellm , S. R. Kulkarni , M. J. Graham , et al. , `` The Zwicky Transient Facility: System Overview, Performance, and First Results ,'' 131 , 018002 (2019)

    2019

  151. [159]

    Rahin , L

    R. Rahin , L. Moleri , A. Vdovin , et al. , `` GALI: a gamma-ray burst localizing instrument ,'' in Space Telescopes and Instrumentation 2020: Ultraviolet to Gamma Ray , J.-W. A. den Herder , S. Nikzad , and K. Nakazawa , Eds., Society of Photo-Optical Instrumentation Engineer...

    2020

  152. [160]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION blank.sep after.quote 'output.state := FUNCTION fin.entry output.state after.quoted.block = 'skip 'add.period if write newline FUNCTION new.block output.state before.all = 'skip output.state after.quote = after.quoted.blo...

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.