REVIEW 1 cited by
Optimal local certification on graphs of bounded pathwidth
Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.
This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.
SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event
T0 review · schema-true
One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.
pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp
abstract
We present proof labeling schemes for graphs with bounded pathwidth that can decide any graph property expressible in monadic second-order (MSO) logic using $O(\log n)$-bit vertex labels. Examples of such properties include planarity, Hamiltonicity, $k$-colorability, $H$-minor-freeness, admitting a perfect matching, and having a vertex cover of a given size. Our proof labeling schemes improve upon a recent result by Fraigniaud, Montealegre, Rapaport, and Todinca (Algorithmica 2024), which achieved the same result for graphs of bounded treewidth but required $O(\log^2 n)$-bit labels. Our improved label size $O(\log n)$ is optimal, as it is well-known that any proof labeling scheme that accepts paths and rejects cycles requires labels of size $\Omega(\log n)$. Our result implies that graphs with pathwidth at most $k$ can be certified using $O(\log n)$-bit labels for any fixed constant $k$. Applying the Excluding Forest Theorem of Robertson and Seymour, we deduce that the class of $F$-minor-free graphs can be certified with $O(\log n)$-bit labels for any fixed forest $F$, thereby providing an affirmative answer to an open question posed by Bousquet, Feuilloley, and Pierron (Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing 2024).
Forward citations
Cited by 1 Pith paper
-
Complexity landscape for local certification
On anonymous paths local certification has a gap between O(1) and Θ(log log n), and a natural property with optimal Θ(log log n) certificates exists; on cycles the gap is between O(1) and Θ(log n).
Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.