Predictive Information Decomposition as a Tool to Quantify Emergent Dynamical Behaviors In Physiological Networks

Alberto Porta; Gorana Mijatovic; Laura Sparacino; Luca Faes

REVIEW 3 major objections 3 minor 38 references

Predictive Information Decomposition as a Tool to Quantify Emergent Dynamical Behaviors In Physiological Networks

T0 review · 3 major / 3 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Cardiovascular networks become more synergistic when sympathetic tone rises.

desk verdict A novel, well-executed application of PID-based predictive information to physiological networks, but the headline synergy/redundancy 'hallmark' depends on two under-validated modeling choices and needs sensitivity analysis before it can be believed. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.00945 v1 pith:LADV6JD4 submitted 2025-02-02 stat.AP

Luca Faes , Gorana Mijatovic , Laura Sparacino , Alberto Porta This is my paper · ORCID

classification stat.AP

keywords predictiveinformationpartialdecompositioncausalemergencesynergyandredundancyvectorautoregressivemodelscardiovascularnetworksautonomicregulationhead-uptilt

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces a way to detect collective, emergent behavior in networks of physiological signals by decomposing predictive information — how much the present state of the whole network can be predicted from its own past — into unique, redundant, and synergistic contributions. It argues that when synergistic information outweighs redundant information, the network is behaving emergently. Applied to heartbeat, blood-pressure, and respiration series measured at rest and during head-up tilt, the method finds statistically significant net synergy whose balance shifts with sympathetic nervous system activation. The authors conclude that the synergy/redundancy balance is a hallmark of integrated short-term autonomic control and a candidate biomarker.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the partial information decomposition of predictive information: $I(X_n; X_{<n}) = \sum_i U(X_n; X^i_{<n}) + R(X_n; X_{<n}) + S(X_n; X_{<n})$, with the synergy/redundancy balance $\Delta_{\text{PID}} = S - R$. The decomposition is solved by building a redundancy lattice over all combinations of source variables and choosing the minimum mutual information (MMI) redundancy function $I_\cap(X_n^\alpha) = \min_j I(X_n; X^{\alpha_j}_{<n})$, then coarse-graining the atoms into unique, redundant, and synergistic terms. Computationally, all mutual information terms follow from one vector autoregressive fit: the full model gives the predictive information, and restricted models obtained by pruning its covariance structure supply the required MI terms, with restricted-model order set to $q=20$.

What would settle it

Recompute $\Delta_{\text{PID}}$ for the same supine and tilt data using a different redundancy function, such as the pointwise common change in surprise or the Ibroja measure, and also with restricted-model orders far above $q=20$ (e.g., $q=100$). If the {S,D,H} network no longer turns from net redundancy to net synergy under tilt, or if the tilt modulation becomes non-significant, the claim that sympathetic activation raises causal emergence is an artifact of the MMI choice and truncation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that causal emergence in physiological networks can be assessed by predictive information decomposition (PrID): the predictive information $I(X_n; X_{<n})$ is split into unique, redundant, and synergistic components via partial information decomposition, and the balance $\Delta_{\text{PID}} = S - R$ serves as a 'strong' measure of emergence. Using vector autoregressive models to compute the required mutual information terms, the paper shows in simulations that net synergy appears when multiple causal interactions and internal dynamics point to the same target, while common-drive or cascade configurations yield net redundancy. In 61 healthy subjects' cardiovascular and respiratory networks, the PID balance is network-specific: redundancy dominates for vascular-respiratory coupling, synergy dominates for cardiovascular-respiratory coupling, and the cardiovascular network shifts from redundant at rest to synergistic during head-up tilt. The paper asserts that this tilt-induced rise in net synergy reflects sympathetic activation and integrated short-term control, a relation not captured by the simpler whole-minus-sum measure.

Load-bearing premise

The reported synergy and redundancy balances rest on a specific definition of redundant information (the minimum of the individual mutual informations) and on approximating each restricted model's history with 20 lags; if either choice is wrong for these signals, the sign and modulation of net synergy could change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Net synergy in a physiological network indicates emergent, integrated control; the method can therefore flag which organ systems act as a collective rather than as independent units.
Because the balance rises under head-up tilt in all three analyzed networks, the measure can serve as a biomarker of sympathetic activation in short-term cardiovascular regulation.
The PID-based balance avoids the multiple counting of redundancy that makes the whole-minus-sum measure always redundancy-dominated for $N \ge 3$, revealing network-specific synergy and redundancy patterns.
Grouping the cardiovascular variables into different triplets yields distinct balances, meaning the framework can characterize which subsets of physiological signals are engaged in high-order interactions.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

A natural next test is whether the tilt-induced rise in net synergy is blunted in patients with autonomic neuropathy or heart failure; if so, the PID balance could serve as a graded readout of autonomic impairment.
The conclusions depend on the MMI redundancy function; re-running the decomposition with alternative PID measures (e.g., based on pointwise common change in surprise) would show whether the network-specific balances are a property of the data or of the chosen redundancy definition.
Because the computation reduces to a single VAR fit, the framework is cheap enough for real-time monitoring, raising the possibility of tracking emergence during graded stress tests or drug interventions.
The simulation results suggest a general design principle: configurations that concentrate causal influences onto one target generate synergy, so one could deliberately probe for synergy to discover hidden convergence in other multi-channel datasets.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

You should know this paper because it takes a known information-theoretic machinery (predictive information, PID, MMI redundancy, Gaussian VAR) and produces a genuinely new empirical observation: in three physiological networks, the PID-based synergy/redundancy balance ΔPID = S − R is network-specific and increases from supine to upright tilt. That specific result is not in the cited literature, and it's a plausible step toward a practical biomarker for autonomic control.

What the paper does well: the math in Eqs. (1)-(5) and (10)-(12) is standard and internally consistent. The simulation study correctly shows that the WMS decomposition double-counts redundancy when N=3 (Eq. 5), which justifies the PID route. The surrogate data testing is reasonable, and the physiological interpretations—respiration as a common driver, closed-loop baroreflex interactions during tilt—are thoughtful and grounded in prior work.

The soft spots are real. The central claim that the balance is a 'hallmark' of integrated control is a statement about ΔPID, which is not a directly measured quantity. It is the output of two choices: the MMI redundancy function (Eq. 8) and the truncated restricted-model order q=20 (Eq. 11). MMI is one of several admissible PID redundancy measures; other Gaussian PIDs (I_broja, I_ccs, etc.) can allocate the same joint MI differently between synergy and redundancy. So the sign of ΔPID could change with the PID choice. The q=20 truncation is also consequential: restricted models are theoretically infinite-order, and truncation biases every restricted MI in Eq. (12). Since R is a minimum over these MIs and S comes out of a Möbius inversion, the bias does not cancel; it can push ΔPID in either direction. The paper gives no sensitivity analysis over q or the redundancy function. That is the main weakness.

There are also two smaller issues: no code or data are shipped, and multiple comparisons across three networks and two conditions are not corrected. Those are minor compared to the sensitivity gap.

Despite these concerns, the paper is not fatally flawed. The method is plausible, the empirical work is real, and the finding might hold up. It deserves a serious referee. I would send it to review and ask the authors to (1) run sensitivity analyses varying q and using at least one alternative Gaussian PID, (2) temper the 'hallmark' language, and (3) make code/data available. If the results are robust to those checks, it becomes a useful contribution.

For a reading group: maybe; it's a good example of PID applied to physiology, but the lack of sensitivity analysis will make the discussion more about method choice than about the physiological finding.

Referee Report

3 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper introduces Predictive Information Decomposition (PrID), a framework to quantify emergent dynamics in multivariate time series by decomposing predictive information into unique, redundant, and synergistic contributions. The authors formulate the decomposition for Gaussian processes using vector autoregressive (VAR) models, apply it to simulated networks and to cardiovascular/respiratory variability series from 61 healthy subjects at rest and during head-up tilt, and report that the synergy/redundancy balance computed via partial information decomposition (PID) increases with sympathetic activation. The manuscript argues that this balance is a hallmark of integrated short-term autonomic control and a potential biomarker.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the paper provides a practical, interpretable tool for quantifying collective dynamics in physiological networks, with a plausible application to autonomic regulation assessment. The theoretical machinery is standard: Eqs. (1)-(5) and the VAR-based mutual information formulas (10)-(12) are internally consistent, the surrogate data procedure is appropriate for the significance tests, and the use of real data from an established protocol strengthens the empirical relevance. The main weakness is that the key numerical results depend on two unvalidated choices—the minimum-MI redundancy function in Eq. (8) and the restricted-model order q=20 in Eq. (11)—and no sensitivity analysis is provided. Because the sign of the reported balance is a statement about the data only after these choices are made, the empirical 'hallmark' claim is not yet fully secured, though it is plausible and testable.

major comments (3)

[Partial information decomposition: solution; Synergy/redundancy balance] The central empirical finding—net synergy and its increase with tilt—rests entirely on the MMI redundancy function in Eq. (8) and on the first-order coarse-graining adopted from Ref. [12]. The paper does not assess whether the sign of ΔPID in Eq. (4) is robust to alternative redundancy measures (e.g., I_broja, I_ccs, or other Gaussian PIDs). Because MMI is known to treat equal predictive power as shared information, the reported balance could shift systematically under a different admissible redundancy function. A sensitivity analysis over redundancy functions, at least for the three triplets in Fig. 5, is needed to support the 'hallmark' claim.
[Practical computation] The restricted models in Eq. (11) are theoretically infinite-order, and the choice q=20 is stated as 'typically sufficient' without validation. Truncation bias in the restricted MIs computed via Eq. (12) does not cancel when the minimum is taken in Eq. (8) and when Möbius inversion is used to obtain S and R; it can push ΔPID in either direction. The paper should report a sensitivity analysis over q (e.g., q=10, 30, 50) and a check of convergence of the restricted MI values for the analyzed triplets, to rule out the possibility that the results in Fig. 5 are artifacts of truncation.
[Application to Physiological Networks; Synergy/redundancy balance] The discrepancy between the WMS and PID results in Fig. 5 (WMS largely negative, PID showing net synergy for {S,H,R} and for {S,D,H} during UP) is interpreted as evidence that PID is necessary for assessing emergence. However, this discrepancy could be driven by the specific coarse-graining aggregation rules and the MMI assumption. To make the claim that the PID reveals 'previously unreported modes of interaction' convincing, the authors should validate the PID synergy using a complementary redundancy measure or demonstrate in simulations that the sign of ΔPID is stable under alternative decompositions.

minor comments (3)

[Application to Physiological Networks, Experimental Protocol] There is a typo in the description of the analyzed variables: 'HP, SAP, SAP and RESP' should read 'HP, SAP, DAP and RESP'.
[General] The paper defines emergence as the prevalence of synergy over redundancy, following Rosas et al. [12], and then interprets the results in those terms. This is legitimate, but the authors should explicitly remind the reader that the 'emergent behavior' conclusion is contingent on this definition, and that other definitions of emergence may lead to different classifications.
[Simulations, Theoretical Example] The simulated example in Fig. 2 is useful but only demonstrates that the measures behave in a way consistent with the authors' definition of emergence. It would be helpful to state more clearly that this is a consistency check, not an independent validation of the definition.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: emergence is explicitly defined, and the empirical results are independent measurements of that defined quantity.

full rationale

The paper defines emergence operationally as the prevalence of synergistic over redundant predictive information (Eq. 4: "here we take the balance ΔPID as a 'strong' measure of emergence"), and then measures this defined quantity in simulations and in physiological data. This is an explicit definition rather than a hidden circular derivation: the tilt-related increase in ΔPID is an empirical outcome that could have gone the other way, and the sympathetic-activation interpretation is anchored to the independent SU-to-UP postural protocol, not to the measure itself. The MMI redundancy function (Eq. 8) and q=20 truncation are acknowledged modeling choices, not parameters fitted to the data whose output is then relabeled as a prediction; they affect robustness but do not make the central claim true by construction. Self-citations (e.g., [16,22,24]) are used for implementation details and prior related decompositions, not as a load-bearing uniqueness argument or as an unverified premise that forces the result. The definition of emergence is imported from Rosas et al. [12], but that citation is external, explicit, and does not itself assert the paper's empirical conclusions. Therefore no specific equation-to-equation reduction or fitted-input-renamed-as-prediction can be exhibited, and the paper is not circular in the sense this pass targets.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on the definitional identification of emergence with positive synergy, on the specific MMI PID solution, and on the Gaussian VAR approximation; none of these is derived in the paper, and the restricted-model computation depends on an external preprint by the same group.

free parameters (1)

restricted model order q = 20
Set to 20 for all restricted VAR models used to estimate the MI terms; described as 'typically sufficient' but not selected by a criterion or validated on the analyzed data.

assumptions (4)

domain assumption Positive synergy in the predictive information decomposition indicates causal emergence, following Rosas et al. [12].
The paper inherits the equation 'emergence = synergy prevalence' from causal emergence theory; it is a definitional choice, not derived within the paper.
domain assumption The MMI redundancy function in Eq. (8) provides a valid decomposition of predictive information.
The PID atoms and the S/R/U terms depend on this specific redundancy measure; alternative PID definitions could change the balance.
domain assumption The physiological time series are adequately modeled by linear Gaussian VAR processes.
The closed-form MI formulas (10)-(12) assume joint Gaussianity; no normality or linearity tests are reported for the HP, SAP, DAP and RESP series.
domain assumption Shuffled surrogates that preserve zero-lag correlations but destroy temporal structure form a valid null distribution for the information measures.
The significance tests in the application section rely on this null; the same-shuffle procedure preserves static correlations but may not capture other confounds.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Predictive Information Decomposition as a Tool to Quantify Emergent Dynamical Behaviors In Physiological Networks." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/LADV6JD4

@misc{pith2026250200945,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Predictive Information Decomposition as a Tool to Quantify Emergent Dynamical Behaviors In Physiological Networks},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/LADV6JD4}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.00945}
}

read the original abstract

Objective: This work introduces a framework for multivariate time series analysis aimed at detecting and quantifying collective emerging behaviors in the dynamics of physiological networks. Methods: Given a network system mapped by a vector random process, we compute the predictive information (PI) between the present and past network states and dissect it into amounts quantifying the unique, redundant and synergistic information shared by the present of the network and the past of each unit. Emergence is then quantified as the prevalence of the synergistic over the redundant contribution. The framework is implemented in practice using vector autoregressive (VAR) models. Results: Validation in simulated VAR processes documents that emerging behaviors arise in networks where multiple causal interactions coexist with internal dynamics. The application to cardiovascular and respiratory networks mapping the beat-to-beat variability of heart rate, arterial pressure and respiration measured at rest and during postural stress reveals the presence of statistically significant net synergy, as well as its modulation with sympathetic nervous system activation. Conclusion: Causal emergence can be efficiently assessed decomposing the PI of network systems via VAR models applied to multivariate time series. This approach evidences the synergy/redundancy balance as a hallmark of integrated short-term autonomic control in cardiovascular and respiratory networks. Significance: Measures of causal emergence provide a practical tool to quantify the mechanisms of causal influence that determine the dynamic state of cardiovascular and neural network systems across distinct physiopathological conditions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.00945 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** FIG. 1. Graphical depiction of PID-based Predictive Information Decomposition. (a) Schematic of the random variables [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** FIG. 2. Predictive Information decomposition in simulated [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** FIG. 3. Whole-minus-sum decomposition of the predictive in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5. Synergy/redundancy balance of the predictive in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4. Partial information decomposition of the predic [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

38 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages

[12]

Mea- suring integrated information: Comparison of candidate measures in theory and simulation,

P. A. Mediano, A. K. Seth, and A. B. Barrett, “Mea- suring integrated information: Comparison of candidate measures in theory and simulation,” Entropy, vol. 21, no. 1, p. 17, 2018

work page 2018
[1]

Network neuroscience,

D. S. Bassett and O. Sporns, “Network neuroscience,” Nature neuroscience, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 353–364, 2017. 10

work page 2017
[2]

of the process X i, and from the coefficients cji modu- lating the causal interactions set at lag 1 from X i to X j (i, j∈ {1, 2, 3}, i ̸= j; connectivity matrices in Fig. 2a). The simulation was performed at varying the strength of the causal coupling from X 1 to X 2 and X 3 modulated by the parameters c21 ∈ [0, 0.5] and c31 ∈ [0, 0.5], with fixed intern...

work page 2022
[3]

The new field of network physiology: building the human physiolome,

P. C. Ivanov, “The new field of network physiology: building the human physiolome,” p. 711778, 2021

work page 2021
[4]

Elec- trophysiological brain connectivity: theory and imple- mentation,

B. He, L. Astolfi, P. A. Vald´ es-Sosa, D. Marinazzo, S. O. Palva, C.-G. B´ enar, C. M. Michel, and T. Koenig, “Elec- trophysiological brain connectivity: theory and imple- mentation,” IEEE transactions on biomedical engineer- ing, vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 2115–2137, 2019

work page 2019
[5]

Cardiovascular and cardiorespiratory coupling analyses: a review,

S. Schulz, F.-C. Adochiei, I.-R. Edu, R. Schroeder, H. Costin, K.-J. B¨ ar, and A. Voss, “Cardiovascular and cardiorespiratory coupling analyses: a review,” Philo- sophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathe- matical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 371, no. 1997, p. 20120191, 2013

work page 1997
[6]

Wiener–granger causality in net- work physiology with applications to cardiovascular con- trol and neuroscience,

A. Porta and L. Faes, “Wiener–granger causality in net- work physiology with applications to cardiovascular con- trol and neuroscience,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 282–309, 2015

work page 2015
[7]

Unifying pairwise interactions in complex dynamics,

O. M. Cliff, A. G. Bryant, J. T. Lizier, N. Tsuchiya, and B. D. Fulcher, “Unifying pairwise interactions in complex dynamics,” Nature Computational Science, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 883–893, 2023

work page 2023

Show all 38 references

[8]

Graph theory methods: applications in brain networks,

O. Sporns, “Graph theory methods: applications in brain networks,” Dialogues in clinical neuroscience, vol. 20, no. 2, pp. 111–121, 2018

2018
[9]

Practical measures of integrated information for time-series data,

A. B. Barrett and A. K. Seth, “Practical measures of integrated information for time-series data,” PLoS com- putational biology, vol. 7, no. 1, p. e1001052, 2011

2011
[10]

Unified frame- work for information integration based on information geometry,

M. Oizumi, N. Tsuchiya, and S.-i. Amari, “Unified frame- work for information integration based on information geometry,” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sci- ences, vol. 113, no. 51, pp. 14 817–14 822, 2016

2016
[11]

Dynamics on higher- order networks: A review,

S. Majhi, M. Perc, and D. Ghosh, “Dynamics on higher- order networks: A review,” Journal of the Royal Society Interface, vol. 19, no. 188, p. 20220043, 2022

2022
[13]

Rec- onciling emergences: An information-theoretic approach to identify causal emergence in multivariate data,

F. E. Rosas, P. A. Mediano, H. J. Jensen, A. K. Seth, A. B. Barrett, R. L. Carhart-Harris, and D. Bor, “Rec- onciling emergences: An information-theoretic approach to identify causal emergence in multivariate data,” PLoS computational biology, vol. 16, no. 12, p. e1008289, 2020

2020
[14]

Syn- ergy, redundancy, and multivariate information mea- sures: an experimentalist’s perspective,

N. Timme, W. Alford, B. Flecker, and J. M. Beggs, “Syn- ergy, redundancy, and multivariate information mea- sures: an experimentalist’s perspective,” Journal of com- putational neuroscience, vol. 36, pp. 119–140, 2014

2014
[15]

Nonnegative decom- position of multivariate information,

P. L. Williams and R. D. Beer, “Nonnegative decom- position of multivariate information,” arXiv preprint arXiv:1004.2515, 2010

2010 arXiv
[16]

Predictability, complexity, and learning,

W. Bialek, I. Nemenman, and N. Tishby, “Predictability, complexity, and learning,” Neural computation, vol. 13, no. 11, pp. 2409–2463, 2001

2001
[17]

Informa- tion decomposition in multivariate systems: definitions, implementation and application to cardiovascular net- works,

L. Faes, A. Porta, G. Nollo, and M. Javorka, “Informa- tion decomposition in multivariate systems: definitions, implementation and application to cardiovascular net- works,” Entropy, vol. 19, no. 1, p. 5, 2017

2017
[18]

Assessing high-order links in cardiovascular and respiratory net- works via static and dynamic information measures,

G. Mijatovic, L. Sparacino, Y. Antonacci, M. Javorka, D. Marinazzo, S. Stramaglia, and L. Faes, “Assessing high-order links in cardiovascular and respiratory net- works via static and dynamic information measures,” IEEE Open Journal of Engineering in Medicine and Bi- ology, 2024

2024
[19]

Basic cardiovas- cular variability signals: mutual directed interactions ex- plored in the information domain,

M. Javorka, J. Krohova, B. Czippelova, Z. Turianikova, Z. Lazarova, K. Javorka, and L. Faes, “Basic cardiovas- cular variability signals: mutual directed interactions ex- plored in the information domain,” Physiological Mea- surement, vol. 38, no. 5, p. 877, 2017

2017
[20]

Cate- gorizing the role of respiration in cardiovascular and cere- brovascular variability interactions,

A. Porta, F. Gelpi, V. Bari, B. Cairo, B. De Maria, D. Tonon, G. Rossato, M. Ranucci, and L. Faes, “Cate- gorizing the role of respiration in cardiovascular and cere- brovascular variability interactions,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering, vol. 69, no. 6, pp. 2065–2...

2021
[21]

Local measures of information storage in complex distributed computation,

J. T. Lizier, M. Prokopenko, and A. Y. Zomaya, “Local measures of information storage in complex distributed computation,” Information Sciences, vol. 208, pp. 39–54, 2012

2012
[22]

Exploration of synergistic and redundant information sharing in static and dynamical gaussian sys- tems,

A. B. Barrett, “Exploration of synergistic and redundant information sharing in static and dynamical gaussian sys- tems,” Physical Review E, vol. 91, no. 5, p. 052802, 2015

2015
[23]

Network representation of higher-order interactions based on information dynam- ics,

G. Mijatovic, Y. Antonacci, M. Javorka, D. Marinazzo, S. Stramaglia, and L. Faes, “Network representation of higher-order interactions based on information dynam- ics,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.15617, 2024

2024 arXiv
[24]

Measuring connectivity in linear multivariate processes: definitions, interpretation, and practical analysis,

L. Faes, S. Erla, and G. Nollo, “Measuring connectivity in linear multivariate processes: definitions, interpretation, and practical analysis,” Computational and mathematical methods in medicine, vol. 2012, no. 1, p. 140513, 2012

2012
[25]

Investigating dynamic high-order interactions in physiological networks through predictive information decomposition,

L. Faes, G. Mijatovic, L. Sparacino, Y. Antonacci, D. Marinazzo, and S. Stramaglia, “Investigating dynamic high-order interactions in physiological networks through predictive information decomposition,” in 2023 45th An- nual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in...

2023
[26]

Neural influences on cardiovascular vari- ability: possibilities and pitfalls,

S. C. Malpas, “Neural influences on cardiovascular vari- ability: possibilities and pitfalls,” American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circulatory Physiology, vol. 282, no. 1, pp. H6–H20, 2002

2002
[27]

Estimating the dimension of a model,

G. Schwarz, “Estimating the dimension of a model,” The annals of statistics, pp. 461–464, 1978

1978
[28]

Univariate and multivariate conditional entropy mea- sures for the characterization of short-term cardiovascu- lar complexity under physiological stress,

M. Valente, M. Javorka, A. Porta, V. Bari, J. Krohova, B. Czippelova, Z. Turianikova, G. Nollo, and L. Faes, “Univariate and multivariate conditional entropy mea- sures for the characterization of short-term cardiovascu- lar complexity under physiological stress,” Physiologica...

2018
[29]

Blood pressure variability: clinical relevance and application,

G. Parati, G. S. Stergiou, E. Dolan, and G. Bilo, “Blood pressure variability: clinical relevance and application,” The Journal of Clinical Hypertension, vol. 20, no. 7, pp. 1133–1137, 2018

2018
[30]

Mechanisms of causal interaction between short-term rr interval and systolic ar- terial pressure oscillations during orthostatic challenge,

L. Faes, G. Nollo, and A. Porta, “Mechanisms of causal interaction between short-term rr interval and systolic ar- terial pressure oscillations during orthostatic challenge,” Journal of applied physiology, vol. 114, no. 12, pp. 1657– 1667, 2013

2013
[31]

Quantifying net synergy/redundancy of sponta- neous variability regulation via predictability and trans- fer entropy decomposition frameworks,

A. Porta, V. Bari, B. De Maria, A. C. Takahashi, S. Guzzetti, R. Colombo, A. M. Catai, F. Raimondi, and L. Faes, “Quantifying net synergy/redundancy of sponta- neous variability regulation via predictability and trans- fer entropy decomposition frameworks,” IEEE Transac- tions...

2017
[32]

Assessing the evolution of redun- dancy/synergy of spontaneous variability regulation with 11 age,

A. Porta, V. Bari, B. De Maria, N. M. Perseguini, J. Mi- lan, P. Rehder-Santos, V. Minatel, A. C. Takahashi, and A. M. Catai, “Assessing the evolution of redun- dancy/synergy of spontaneous variability regulation with 11 age,” Physiological Measurement, vol. 38, no. 5, p. 940, 2017

2017
[33]

Towards under- standing the complexity of cardiovascular oscillations: Insights from information theory,

M. Javorka, J. Krohova, B. Czippelova, Z. Turianikova, Z. Lazarova, R. Wiszt, and L. Faes, “Towards under- standing the complexity of cardiovascular oscillations: Insights from information theory,” Computers in biology and medicine, vol. 98, pp. 48–57, 2018

2018
[34]

Paced breathing increases the redundancy of cardiorespiratory control in healthy individuals and chronic heart failure patients,

A. Porta, R. Maestri, V. Bari, B. De Maria, B. Cairo, E. Vaini, M. T. La Rovere, and G. D. Pinna, “Paced breathing increases the redundancy of cardiorespiratory control in healthy individuals and chronic heart failure patients,” Entropy, vol. 20, no. 12, p. 949, 2018

2018
[35]

Information decom- position in the frequency domain: A new framework to study cardiovascular and cardiorespiratory oscillations,

L. Faes, R. Pernice, G. Mijatovic, Y. Antonacci, J. C. Krohova, M. Javorka, and A. Porta, “Information decom- position in the frequency domain: A new framework to study cardiovascular and cardiorespiratory oscillations,” Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, vol. ...

2021
[36]

Transfer function analysis of the circulation: unique insights into cardiovascular regula- tion,

J. P. Saul, R. D. Berger, P. Albrecht, S. Stein, M. H. Chen, and R. Cohen, “Transfer function analysis of the circulation: unique insights into cardiovascular regula- tion,” American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Cir- culatory Physiology, vol. 261, no. 4, pp. H1231–H1245, 1991

1991
[37]

Respiratory sinus arrhyth- mia in humans: how breathing pattern modulates heart rate,

J. A. Hirsch and B. Bishop, “Respiratory sinus arrhyth- mia in humans: how breathing pattern modulates heart rate,” American Journal of Physiology-Heart and Circu- latory Physiology, vol. 241, no. 4, pp. H620–H629, 1981

1981
[38]

A new framework for the time-and frequency-domain assessment of high-order interactions in networks of random processes,

L. Faes, G. Mijatovic, Y. Antonacci, R. Pernice, C. Bar` a, L. Sparacino, M. Sammartino, A. Porta, D. Marinazzo, and S. Stramaglia, “A new framework for the time-and frequency-domain assessment of high-order interactions in networks of random processes,” IEEE Transactions on S...

2022

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [12]

Mea- suring integrated information: Comparison of candidate measures in theory and simulation,

P. A. Mediano, A. K. Seth, and A. B. Barrett, “Mea- suring integrated information: Comparison of candidate measures in theory and simulation,” Entropy, vol. 21, no. 1, p. 17, 2018

work page 2018

[2] [1]

Network neuroscience,

D. S. Bassett and O. Sporns, “Network neuroscience,” Nature neuroscience, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 353–364, 2017. 10

work page 2017

[3] [2]

of the process X i, and from the coefficients cji modu- lating the causal interactions set at lag 1 from X i to X j (i, j∈ {1, 2, 3}, i ̸= j; connectivity matrices in Fig. 2a). The simulation was performed at varying the strength of the causal coupling from X 1 to X 2 and X 3 modulated by the parameters c21 ∈ [0, 0.5] and c31 ∈ [0, 0.5], with fixed intern...

work page 2022

[4] [3]

The new field of network physiology: building the human physiolome,

P. C. Ivanov, “The new field of network physiology: building the human physiolome,” p. 711778, 2021

work page 2021

[5] [4]

Elec- trophysiological brain connectivity: theory and imple- mentation,

B. He, L. Astolfi, P. A. Vald´ es-Sosa, D. Marinazzo, S. O. Palva, C.-G. B´ enar, C. M. Michel, and T. Koenig, “Elec- trophysiological brain connectivity: theory and imple- mentation,” IEEE transactions on biomedical engineer- ing, vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 2115–2137, 2019

work page 2019

[6] [5]

Cardiovascular and cardiorespiratory coupling analyses: a review,

S. Schulz, F.-C. Adochiei, I.-R. Edu, R. Schroeder, H. Costin, K.-J. B¨ ar, and A. Voss, “Cardiovascular and cardiorespiratory coupling analyses: a review,” Philo- sophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathe- matical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, vol. 371, no. 1997, p. 20120191, 2013

work page 1997

[7] [6]

Wiener–granger causality in net- work physiology with applications to cardiovascular con- trol and neuroscience,

A. Porta and L. Faes, “Wiener–granger causality in net- work physiology with applications to cardiovascular con- trol and neuroscience,” Proceedings of the IEEE, vol. 104, no. 2, pp. 282–309, 2015

work page 2015

[8] [7]

Unifying pairwise interactions in complex dynamics,

O. M. Cliff, A. G. Bryant, J. T. Lizier, N. Tsuchiya, and B. D. Fulcher, “Unifying pairwise interactions in complex dynamics,” Nature Computational Science, vol. 3, no. 10, pp. 883–893, 2023

work page 2023