pith. sign in

arxiv: 2502.01345 · v2 · submitted 2025-02-03 · 🧮 math.NT

Sums of two units in number fields

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 04:32 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification 🧮 math.NT
keywords number fieldsunitsunit equationsfinitenesscubic fieldsDirichlet unit theoremsums of units
0
0 comments X

The pith

In number fields without real quadratic subfields, only finitely many positive integers arise as sums of two units.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper defines N_K as the set of positive integers n that equal the sum of two units in the ring of integers of a number field K. It proves this set is finite whenever K contains no real quadratic subfield, using the rank and signature of the unit group. For cubic fields that are cyclic or have negative discriminant the authors list every solution explicitly. A reader cares because the result limits additive relations among units, which recur in Diophantine equations and class-number problems.

Core claim

Let K be a number field with ring of integers O_K. Let N_K be the set of positive integers n such that there exist units ε, δ in O_K^× satisfying ε + δ = n. We show that N_K is a finite set if K does not contain any real quadratic subfield. In the case where K is a cubic field, we also explicitly classify all solutions to the unit equation ε + δ = n when K is either cyclic or has negative discriminant.

What carries the argument

The set N_K of positive integers expressible as sums of two units from O_K^×.

If this is right

  • N_K is finite for all totally complex fields and for all fields whose only real embeddings come from a single real quadratic factor or none.
  • For cubic fields that are cyclic or have negative discriminant, every solution (ε, δ, n) can be written down in a finite list.
  • The presence or absence of a real quadratic subfield sharply separates fields with finite versus possibly infinite N_K.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Fields that do contain a real quadratic subfield are expected to admit infinitely many such sums because units can grow without bound along the two real directions.
  • The finiteness result supplies an effective bound once the unit group is known, allowing in-principle computation of N_K for any concrete field satisfying the hypothesis.
  • The same distinction may govern other additive problems involving units, such as sums of three or more units.

Load-bearing premise

The unit group obeys the standard rank and signature given by Dirichlet's theorem, so that real quadratic subfields are the only case allowing unbounded sums.

What would settle it

An explicit number field with no real quadratic subfield together with an infinite list of distinct positive integers each equal to a sum of two of its units would disprove the claim.

read the original abstract

Let $K$ be a number field with ring of integers $\mathcal{O}_K$. Let $\mathcal{N}_K$ be the set of positive integers $n$ such that there exist units $\varepsilon, \delta \in \mathcal{O}_K^\times$ satisfying $\varepsilon + \delta = n$. We show that $\mathcal{N}_K$ is a finite set if $K$ does not contain any real quadratic subfield. In the case where $K$ is a cubic field, we also explicitly classify all solutions to the unit equation $\varepsilon + \delta = n$ when $K$ is either cyclic or has negative discriminant.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Referee Report

0 major / 3 minor

Summary. The paper defines N_K as the set of positive integers expressible as sums of two units from O_K^x. It proves that N_K is finite whenever the number field K contains no real quadratic subfield. For cubic fields it further classifies all solutions to ε + δ = n when K is cyclic or has negative discriminant.

Significance. The result gives a clean, Dirichlet-unit-theorem-based criterion for boundedness of unit sums, distinguishing fields by the presence or absence of a rank-1 real unit group. The cubic classification supplies explicit, checkable data. If the proofs are complete and self-contained, the work strengthens the literature on unit equations and S-unit equations in number fields.

minor comments (3)
  1. The abstract states the main theorems but the manuscript should include a short outline of the proof strategy (e.g., reduction to the action of the unit group on the embedding space) already in the introduction for readability.
  2. In the cubic classification section, verify that all listed solutions satisfy the unit equation by direct computation and state the range of n explicitly rather than leaving it implicit.
  3. Add a reference to the classical results on the equation x + y = 1 in units (e.g., Siegel, Evertse) to situate the finiteness statement.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

0 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their positive summary of the manuscript, for recognizing its significance in the context of unit equations, and for recommending minor revision. No major comments appear in the report.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No significant circularity; standard application of Dirichlet unit theorem

full rationale

The paper states a finiteness result for the set N_K of positive integers expressible as sums of two units, conditioned on the absence of real quadratic subfields. This follows directly from the rank of the unit group O_K^x being r1 + r2 - 1 (Dirichlet's theorem), which is an external, independently established fact not derived within the paper. The abstract and claimed theorem contain no equations that redefine quantities in terms of themselves, no fitted parameters presented as predictions, and no load-bearing self-citations that would make the central claim tautological. The cubic-field classification is presented as an explicit enumeration, not a renaming or self-referential construction. The derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks and exhibits no reduction of outputs to inputs by construction.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 1 axioms · 0 invented entities

Review performed on abstract only; the paper is expected to rest on standard algebraic number theory.

axioms (1)
  • standard math Dirichlet's unit theorem: the unit group O_K^× is finitely generated of rank r1 + r2 - 1
    Implicitly used to control the possible units whose sums can produce infinitely many n.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5636 in / 1152 out tokens · 53526 ms · 2026-05-23T04:32:57.513168+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Sign in with ORCID, Apple, or X to comment. Anyone can read and Pith papers without signing in.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

67 extracted references · 67 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Alvarado, A

    A. Alvarado, A. Koutsianas, B. Malmskog, C. Rasmussen, C. Vincent, and M. West. A robust implementation for solving the S -unit equation and several applications. In Arithmetic geometry, number theory, and computation , Simons Symp., pages 1--41. Springer, Cham, [2021] 2021

  2. [2]

    Amoroso and E

    F. Amoroso and E. Viada. Small points on subvarieties of a torus. Duke Math. J. , 150(3):407--442, 2009

  3. [3]

    A. Baker. Linear forms in the logarithms of algebraic numbers. I , II , III . Mathematika , 13:204--216; ibid. 14 (1967), 102--107; ibid. 14 (1967), 220--228, 1966

  4. [4]

    P. Belcher. A test for integers being sums of distinct units applied to cubic fields. J. London Math. Soc. (2) , 12(2):141--148, 1975/76

  5. [5]

    Barroero, C

    F. Barroero, C. Frei, and R. F. Tichy. Additive unit representations in rings over global fields---a survey. Publ. Math. Debrecen , 79(3-4):291--307, 2011

  6. [6]

    Dombek, Z

    D. Dombek, Z. Mas\'akov\'a, and V. Ziegler. On distinct unit generated fields that are totally complex. J. Number Theory , 148:311--327, 2015

  7. [7]

    Evertse and K

    J.-H. Evertse and K. Gy o ry. Unit equations in D iophantine number theory , volume 146 of Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2015

  8. [8]

    Evertse and K

    J.-H. Evertse and K. Gy o ry. Discriminant equations in D iophantine number theory , volume 32 of New Mathematical Monographs . Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2017

  9. [9]

    Evertse, K

    J.-H. Evertse, K. Gy o ry, C. L. Stewart, and R. Tijdeman. S -unit equations and their applications. In New advances in transcendence theory ( D urham, 1986) , pages 110--174. Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1988

  10. [10]

    V. Ennola. Cubic number fields with exceptional units. In Computational number theory ( D ebrecen, 1989) , pages 103--128. de Gruyter, Berlin, 1991

  11. [11]

    Freitas, A

    N. Freitas, A. Kraus, and S. Siksek. The unit equation over cyclic number fields of prime degree. Algebra Number Theory , 15(10):2647--2653, 2021

  12. [12]

    C. Frei. On rings of integers generated by their units. Bull. Lond. Math. Soc. , 44(1):167--182, 2012

  13. [13]

    Freitas and S

    N. Freitas and S. Siksek. The asymptotic F ermat's last theorem for five-sixths of real quadratic fields. Compos. Math. , 151(8):1395--1415, 2015

  14. [14]

    Filipin, R

    A. Filipin, R. Tichy, and V. Ziegler. The additive unit structure of pure quartic complex fields. Funct. Approx. Comment. Math. , 39:113--131, 2008

  15. [15]

    Filipin, R

    A. Filipin, R. Tichy, and V. Ziegler. On the quantitative unit sum number problem---an application of the subspace theorem. Acta Arith. , 133(4):297--308, 2008

  16. [16]

    Fuchs, R

    C. Fuchs, R. Tichy, and V. Ziegler. On quantitative aspects of the unit sum number problem. Arch. Math. (Basel) , 93(3):259--268, 2009

  17. [17]

    Hoshi and K

    A. Hoshi and K. Miyake. A note on the field isomorphism problem of X^3+sX+s and related cubic T hue equations. Interdiscip. Inform. Sci. , 16(1):45--54, 2010

  18. [18]

    A. Hoshi. On correspondence between solutions of a family of cubic T hue equations and isomorphism classes of the simplest cubic fields. J. Number Theory , 131(11):2135--2150, 2011

  19. [19]

    J. Houriet. Exceptional units and E uclidean number fields. Arch. Math. (Basel) , 88(5):425--433, 2007

  20. [20]

    Hajdu and V

    L. Hajdu and V. Ziegler. Distinct unit generated totally complex quartic fields. Math. Comp. , 83(287):1495--1512, 2014

  21. [21]

    Jacobson

    B. Jacobson. Sums of distinct divisors and sums of distinct units. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. , 15:179--183, 1964

  22. [22]

    Jarden and W

    M. Jarden and W. Narkiewicz. On sums of units. Monatsh. Math. , 150(4):327--332, 2007

  23. [23]

    T. Komatsu. Pairs of cyclic cubic units with rational difference. Int. J. Number Theory , 21(1):35--52, 2025

  24. [24]

    J. Kostra. On sums of two units. Abh. Math. Sem. Univ. Hamburg , 64:11--14, 1994

  25. [25]

    Koutsianas

    A. Koutsianas. Computing all elliptic curves over an arbitrary number fieldwith prescribed primes of bad reduction. Exp. Math. , 28(1):1--15, 2019

  26. [26]

    H. W. Lenstra, Jr. Euclidean number fields of large degree. Invent. Math. , 38(3):237--254, 1976/77

  27. [27]

    Leutbecher

    A. Leutbecher. Euclidean fields having a large L enstra constant. Ann. Inst. Fourier (Grenoble) , 35(2):83--106, 1985

  28. [28]

    Leutbecher and J

    A. Leutbecher and J. Martinet. Lenstra's constant and E uclidean number fields. In Arithmetic C onference ( M etz, 1981) , volume 94 of Ast\'erisque , pages 87--131. Soc. Math. France, Paris, 1982

  29. [29]

    Leutbecher and G

    A. Leutbecher and G. Niklasch. On cliques of exceptional units and L enstra's construction of E uclidean fields. In Number theory ( U lm, 1987) , volume 1380 of Lecture Notes in Math. , pages 150--178. Springer, New York, 1989

  30. [30]

    S. R. Louboutin. Non- G alois cubic number fields with exceptional units. Publ. Math. Debrecen , 91(1-2):153--170, 2017

  31. [31]

    S. R. Louboutin. Non- G alois cubic number fields with exceptional units. P art II . J. Number Theory , 206:62--80, 2020

  32. [32]

    Lemmermeyer and A

    F. Lemmermeyer and A. Peth o . Simplest cubic fields. Manuscripta Math. , 88(1):53--58, 1995

  33. [33]

    Lettl, A

    G. Lettl, A. Peth o , and P. Voutier. Simple families of T hue inequalities. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. , 351(5):1871--1894, 1999

  34. [34]

    Levesque and M

    C. Levesque and M. Waldschmidt. Familles d'\'equations de T hue- M ahler n'ayant que des solutions triviales. Acta Arith. , 155(2):117--138, 2012

  35. [35]

    J.-F. Mestre. Corps euclidiens, unit\'es exceptionnelles et courbes \'elliptiques. J. Number Theory , 13(2):123--137, 1981

  36. [36]

    Mignotte

    M. Mignotte. Verification of a conjecture of E . T homas. J. Number Theory , 44(2):172--177, 1993

  37. [37]

    Minemura

    K. Minemura. On totally real cubic fields whose unit groups are of type \ +r, +s\ . Proc. Japan Acad. Ser. A Math. Sci. , 74(10):156--159, 1998

  38. [38]

    Mignotte, A

    M. Mignotte, A. Peth o , and F. Lemmermeyer. On the family of T hue equations x^3-(n-1)x^2y-(n+2)xy^2-y^3=k . Acta Arith. , 76(3):245--269, 1996

  39. [39]

    T. Nagell. Darstellung ganzer Z ahlen durch bin\"are kubische F ormen mit negativer D iskriminante. Math. Z. , 28(1):10--29, 1928

  40. [40]

    T. Nagell. Les points exceptionnels rationnels sur certaines cubiques du premier genre. Acta Arith. , 5:333--357, 1959

  41. [41]

    T. Nagell. Les points exceptionnels sur les cubiques ax 3 +by 3 +cz 3 =0 . Acta Sci. Math. (Szeged) , 21:173--180, 1960

  42. [42]

    T. Nagell. Sur une propri\'et\'e des unit\'es d'un corps alg\'ebrique. Ark. Mat. , 5:343--356, 1964

  43. [43]

    T. Nagell. Sur les unit\'es dans les corps biquadratiques primitifs du premier rang. Ark. Mat. , 7:359--394, 1968

  44. [44]

    T. Nagell. Quelques probl\`emes relatifs aux unit\'es alg\'ebriques. Ark. Mat. , 8:115--127, 1970

  45. [45]

    T. Nagell. Sur un type particulier d'unit\'es alg\'ebriques. Ark. Mat. , 8:163--184, 1970

  46. [46]

    Narkiewicz

    W. Narkiewicz. Elementary and analytic theory of algebraic numbers . Springer Monographs in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, third edition, 2004

  47. [47]

    M. Newman. Diophantine equations in cyclotomic fields. J. Reine Angew. Math. , 265:84--89, 1974

  48. [48]

    M. Newman. Units differing by rationals in a cyclotomic field. Linear and Multilinear Algebra , 34(1):55--57, 1993

  49. [49]

    Niklasch and N

    G. Niklasch and N. P. Smart. Exceptional units in a family of quartic number fields. Math. Comp. , 67(222):759--772, 1998

  50. [50]

    D. Shanks. The simplest cubic fields. Math. Comp. , 28:1137--1152, 1974

  51. [51]

    C. L. Siegel. \" U ber einige anwendungen diophantischer approximationen. Abh. Preuss. Akad. Wiss. Phys.-Math. Kl. , 1:81--138, 1929

  52. [52]

    J. H. Silverman. Exceptional units and numbers of small M ahler measure. Experiment. Math. , 4(1):69--83, 1995

  53. [53]

    J. H. Silverman. Small S alem numbers, exceptional units, and L ehmer's conjecture. volume 26, pages 1099--1114. 1996. Symposium on Diophantine Problems (Boulder, CO, 1994)

  54. [54]

    N. Smart. Solving discriminant form equations via unit equations. J. Symbolic Comput. , 21(3):367--374, 1996

  55. [55]

    C. L. Stewart. Exceptional units and cyclic resultants. Acta Arith. , 155(4):407--418, 2012

  56. [56]

    C. L. Stewart. Exceptional units and cyclic resultants, II . In Diophantine methods, lattices, and arithmetic theory of quadratic forms , volume 587 of Contemp. Math. , pages 191--200. Amer. Math. Soc., Providence, RI, 2013

  57. [57]

    Szemer\'edi

    E. Szemer\'edi. On sets of integers containing no k elements in arithmetic progression. Acta Arith. , 27:199--245, 1975

  58. [58]

    Tzanakis and B

    N. Tzanakis and B. M. M. de Weger. On the practical solution of the T hue equation. J. Number Theory , 31(2):99--132, 1989

  59. [59]

    Tzanakis and B

    N. Tzanakis and B. M. M. de Weger. How to explicitly solve a T hue- M ahler equation. Compositio Math. , 84(3):223--288, 1992

  60. [60]

    E. Thomas. Fundamental units for orders in certain cubic number fields. J. Reine Angew. Math. , 310:33--55, 1979

  61. [61]

    E. Thomas. Complete solutions to a family of cubic D iophantine equations. J. Number Theory , 34(2):235--250, 1990

  62. [62]

    Triantafillou

    N. Triantafillou. There are no exceptional units in number fields of degree prime to 3 where 3 splits completely. Proc. Amer. Math. Soc. Ser. B , 8:371--376, 2021

  63. [63]

    R. F. Tichy and V. Ziegler. Units generating the ring of integers of complex cubic fields. Colloq. Math. , 109(1):71--83, 2007

  64. [64]

    von K\"anel

    R. von K\"anel. An effective proof of the hyperelliptic S hafarevich conjecture. J. Th\'eor. Nombres Bordeaux , 26(2):507--530, 2014

  65. [65]

    Vukusic and V

    I. Vukusic and V. Ziegler. On a family of unit equations over simplest cubic fields. J. Th\'eor. Nombres Bordeaux , 34(3):705--718, 2022

  66. [66]

    J. Xia, J. Chen, and S. Zhang. On the family of T hue equation |x^3+mx^2y-(m+3)xy^2+y^3|=k . Wuhan Univ. J. Nat. Sci. , 11(3):481--485, 2006

  67. [67]

    V. Ziegler. The additive unit structure of complex biquadratic fields. Glas. Mat. Ser. III , 43(63)(2):293--307, 2008