Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 46 references

Low regularity analysis of the Zakharov--Kuznetsov equation on $\mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{T}$

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Near-resonant interactions in the ZK equation on a cylinder are forced into a triangle, and that geometry yields optimal local well-posedness and almost-sure solutions below L2.

desk verdict A genuinely promising paper with a real load-bearing gap in the s>3/4 X^{s,b} proof; the Y^{s,b} and probabilistic parts look solid enough to justify referee time. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.01818 v1 pith:3G63R6XP submitted 2025-02-03 math.AP

Gonzalo Cao-Labora This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.AP MSC 35Q5335A0135R60
keywords Zakharov–KuznetsovequationcylinderRxTlocalwell-posednessresonantsetbilinearestimatesX^{sb}spacesY^{srandomizedinitialdata
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper's target is the local Cauchy problem for the Zakharov–Kuznetsov equation $u_t + \partial_{x_1}\Delta u = \frac12\partial_{x_1}(u^2)$ on the cylinder $\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{T}$, where the $x_2$-direction is periodic and non-dispersive. It establishes local well-posedness in Fourier restriction spaces for every regularity $s>3/4$ in $X^{s,b}$, and for every $s>1/2$ in the weighted space $Y^{s,b}$ when the data satisfy a natural low-frequency condition, and it proves these thresholds are optimal for the bilinear fixed-point estimates. The engine is a geometric description of the resonant set: whenever the phase sum $\Delta$ and its directional derivatives are small, the three spatial frequencies must lie within an $O(M)$ neighborhood of a triangle with vertices $(0,k)$, $(-k/2,-k/2)$, $(k/2,-k/2)$, up to rearrangement. The paper also randomizes generic initial data and proves almost-sure local solutions for every $s_1 > -1/26$, with the nonlinear remainder in the smoother space $Y^{s,b}$, $s>1/2$. A reader should care because this is the first route below $L^2$ regularities on the cylinder and because the resonant-set geometry looks like a transferable structural fact about the equation.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the rigidity classification: if three comparable frequencies satisfy the first dyadic smallness condition, then up to rearrangement $|\nu|\lesssim M$, $|(\zeta,m)-(-k/2,-k/2)|\lesssim M$ and $|(\xi,n)-(k/2,-k/2)|\lesssim M$; this follows from a lemma saying that three zero-sum vectors of nearly equal length must be rotations of one another by $2\pi/3$. Around that classification the proof builds a dyadic decomposition into $M$-interactions of first and second kind, uses two new bilinear estimates on boxes of side $\sim M$ whose gains are $M\sqrt{\min(L_1,L_2)}$ and $1/(N^{1/2}\sqrt{L_1L_2})$, and adds, for random data, the composite norm $Z^{s,b}$ consisting of $Y^{s,b}$ plus an $L^8$-in-frequency, $L^2$-in-time term that controls concentration of mass on small frequency sets.

What would settle it

Solve the polynomial system $|\Delta|\leq N^2 M$, $|\theta_i-\theta_j|\leq M$, $\nu+\zeta+\xi=0$, $k+m+n=0$, and $N\leq |(\nu,k)|,|(\zeta,m)|,|(\xi,n)|\leq 8N$, then measure the maximal distance of each triple to the triangle with vertices $(0,k)$, $(-k/2,-k/2)$, $(k/2,-k/2)$ over all rearrangements. If for a sequence with $M/N\to 0$ this distance is not $O(M)$, the rigidity classification is false and the deterministic proof collapses; equivalently, an explicit sequence showing the bilinear estimate (1.7) diverges for some $s$ just above $1/2$ in $Y^{s,b}$ would refute the weighted well-posedness theorem.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that the resonant set of the Zakharov–Kuznetsov equation on $\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{T}$ is not a wild algebraic variety but a rigid, finite-type configuration. Concretely, for three frequencies $\nu+\zeta+\xi=0$, $k+m+n=0$ of comparable size, the condition that $\Delta=\varphi(\nu,k)+\varphi(\zeta,m)+\varphi(\xi,n)$ and its first directional derivatives are all small forces the three vectors to lie, up to rearrangement and $O(M)$ error, inside boxes around $(0,k)$, $(-k/2,-k/2)$, $(k/2,-k/2)$. The proof partitions the comparable-frequency regime into dyadic $M$-interactions, treats 'first-kind' interactions where $\Delta$ is large by oscillation, 'second-kind' ones by refined bilinear estimates where the $\theta_i$-differences are large, and confines the bad triangle region to a small set where the weight $x\xi/|\xi|$ in $Y^{s,b}$ (or a dedicated $L^8$-frequency norm in $Z^{s,b}$) supplies exactly the missing power. This yields the $s>1/2$ weighted and $s>3/4$ unweighted bilinear estimates, and the counterexamples in the paper's Theorem 1.5 show neither survives below those exponents, up to endpoints.

Load-bearing premise

Everything rests on the rigidity classification: that near-resonant, small-derivative frequency triples of comparable size are within a uniform constant multiple of $M$ of the triangle shape, and if those constants deteriorated with the dyadic scale, the case-4 estimates that produce $s>1/2$ and $s>3/4$ would not close.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Deterministically, local well-posedness on $\mathbb{R}\times\mathbb{T}$ now holds for all $s>3/4$ in $X^{s,b}$, and for all $s>1/2$ in $Y^{s,b}$ with the natural low-frequency condition, improving the previously known $s\ge 1$ and $s>9/10$ results.
  • The $s>3/4$ and $s>1/2$ thresholds are optimal for the bilinear estimates or Picard iteration: below them the data-to-solution map cannot be $C^2$, so any improvement must use a genuinely non-Picard argument.
  • For generic randomized initial data, almost-sure local solutions exist in $H^{s_1}$ for every $s_1>-1/26$, with the remainder smoother than the linear evolution; this is the paper's first step below $L^2$ toward a Gibbs measure.
  • The $Z^{s,b}$ construction isolates a mechanism in which $L^\infty$-in-frequency control beats $L^2$ control in very resonant regions, a mechanism the paper argues should apply to other dispersive problems where small sets of frequencies carry the obstruction.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper leaves implicit that the same triangle rigidity should survive small perturbations of the dispersion relation, for instance anisotropic or higher-order variants of the Zakharov–Kuznetsov equation; if it does, the dyadic good/bad architecture would transfer directly.
  • Since the paper itself doubts optimality of $s_1>-1/26$, a natural next step is to re-run the $Z^{s,b}$ estimates with sharper high-low randomization lemmas; the explicit obstruction is the near-vertical low-frequency configuration where the $L^8$ control is only barely sufficient.
  • A concrete testable extension would be to replace Gaussians by any independent random variables with exponentially decaying tails in the randomization; the paper's argument uses only independence and tail decay, so verifying the theorem for, say, Bernoulli random variables would confirm the mechanism's robustness.
  • The endpoint cases are left open by the optimality statement: deciding whether $s=1/2$ in $Y^{s,b}$ or $s=3/4$ in $X^{s,b}$ actually fails would sharpen the boundary between the Picard method and whatever non-Picard argument might reach the critical regularity $s_c=-1$.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper studies the Zakharov–Kuznetsov equation on the cylinder R×T. It proves local well-posedness in X^{s,b} for every s>3/4 and in Y^{s,b} for every s>1/2 under the natural low-frequency condition, and it shows that these regularity ranges are optimal for the corresponding bilinear estimates up to endpoints. The method is a dyadic decomposition of the resonant set, based on a geometric rigidity result saying that near-resonant frequencies must lie close to a specific triangular configuration. The paper also proves almost sure local well-posedness for generic randomized initial data in H^{s1} for every s1>-1/26, with the remainder lying in Y^{s,b}, s>1/2, using a novel Z^{s,b} norm that combines an L2-based Y^{s,b} part with an L8-based auxiliary part.

Significance. If the results are correct, this is a substantial improvement over the previous deterministic well-posedness range in R×T and provides the first sub-L2 almost sure result in this geometry, with a smoothing remainder. The deterministic part is written in considerable detail, with explicit dyadic estimates, a geometric classification of the resonant set, and concrete counterexamples for the sharpness statements. The paper also introduces an L8-based auxiliary norm in the context of random-data well-posedness; this is a promising idea that may be applicable elsewhere. The main external input, Proposition 2.3 from Molinet–Pilod, is properly cited and used as a black box. No parameter fitting or circular reasoning is apparent.

major comments (2)
  1. [§3.1, Eq. (3.12)] The displayed moment computation Eω(g_k g_m g_{k'}g_{m'}) is not correct for the complex Gaussians defined in (1.10). For standard complex Gaussians, Isserlis/Wick pairing pairs holomorphic factors with antiholomorphic factors, so the correct expression in the second integral of (3.12) should involve Eω(g_k g_m \overline{g_{k'}}\overline{g_{m'}}). With complex Gaussians, the nondegenerate expectation Eω(g_k g_m g_{k'}g_{m'}) is zero for the three pairings listed, and the third pairing (k,k')=-(m,m') does not arise for the holomorphic term (Sptq u_ω^0)^2; it arises only for the mixed term Sptq u_ω^0 \overline{Sptq u_ω^0}. The subsequent case analysis of Proposition 3.2 is therefore not justified as written. The proof can likely be repaired by using real Gaussians throughout the probabilistic part, or by carrying the antiholomorphic factors through and checking that the two genuine pairings for the holomorphic term satisfy the same estimates, but this is a load-bearing correction.
  2. [§2.5, Eqs. (2.40) and (2.47)] The quantification of ε in the reduction leading to (2.40) is not explicit, and the sentence after (2.47) saying that '(2.40) is satisfied for I2 as long as s>3/4' does not follow from the displayed bound without further explanation. The dyadic reduction in (2.7) fixes ε with δ<<ε<<s-1/2, while (2.40) asks for a bound by N^{ε/2} with no explanation of which ε is meant. Substituting the bound I2 ≤ L_med^{1/2} L_max^{1/4} (log N)/N^{1/4} gives N^{1/2}I2/(L1L2L3)^{1/2} ≈ N^{1/4} (log N)/(L_min^{1/2}L_max^{1/4}), which exceeds N^{ε/2} for small ε, in particular for ε<s-1/2<1/2 when s<1. To make the argument valid, the authors should state that the ε in (2.40) is an auxiliary exponent that may be taken larger than 1/2, and that the final dyadic ε in (2.39) is then chosen just above 1/4+9δ, which is admissible whenever s>3/4. With this clarification the alleged N^{1/4} gap disappears; as written, however, the proof of (2.6) is incomplete.
minor comments (5)
  1. [§2.5.1, after Eq. (2.45)] A similar ε-quantification point applies to the harmless logarithmic loss in the bound for I1: log N is bounded by N^{ε/2} for any fixed ε>0, but this should be stated explicitly, since the text currently claims (2.40) without discussing the ε convention.
  2. [§2.3.2, Definition 2.8] In the definition of M-interactions and in the sentence after (2.30), the notation 'mint|ν|, |ζ|, |ξ|u' is a typesetting artifact; the intended expression is min{|ν|,|ζ|,|ξ|}. Please correct all such instances.
  3. [§2.2.3, Subcase A] The argument that N3=Nmin in subcase A would benefit from one more sentence: after using N3≤6 min{N1,N2} and Nmax≥8Nmin, the contradiction with N3=Nmax should be written out explicitly, since the current text is terse.
  4. [§3.1, Remark 3.4] Remark 3.4 treats the case (k,k')=-(m,m') as part of the holomorphic term; after correcting the moment formula, this case should be moved to the analysis of the mixed term Sptq u_ω^0 \overline{Sptq u_ω^0}, or the authors should explain why overcounting this case is harmless for the upper bound.
  5. [General] Several inline displays are corrupted by OCR artifacts, for example 'N 1{2' for N^{1/2} and 'L 1{2} i' for L_i^{1/2}. The authors should carefully proofread the final version.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper's bilinear estimates and well-posedness results are derived from in-paper phase-space analysis and standard external inputs, not from their own conclusions.

full rationale

The derivation chain is self-contained against circularity. The main estimates (1.7) are reduced to dyadic frequency estimates in Sections 2.2 and 2.4 using standard Cauchy-Schwarz and duality arguments; no parameter is fitted to the target result. The key resonant-set analysis (Lemma 2.5, Lemma 2.6, Corollary 2.10) is proved inside the paper from the explicit form of the resonance function and elementary geometry, and it is not imported from a self-citation or from the theorem being proved. The only substantive external input is Proposition 2.3 from Molinet-Pilod [35], a prior theorem whose assumptions do not include the X^{s,b} or Y^{s,b} estimates established here; citing it is legitimate independent support. The paper has a single author and contains no load-bearing self-citation chain. The probabilistic result likewise builds on the deterministic bilinear estimates plus an L8-based auxiliary norm, and the counterexamples in Theorem 1.5 are constructed from the resonant configurations already analyzed, which are independent saturation examples rather than renamed inputs. The skeptical objection about the I2 bound in Section 2.5.2 is a possible mathematical gap or correctness risk, not an instance of circularity: a failed estimate is not an equivalence-by-construction or a fitted-input-as-prediction. Accordingly, no circular step is identified.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No empirical parameters are fitted: the constants delta, epsilon, c, beta, and C are smallness or largeness constants chosen a posteriori in the proof, not data. No new physical entities are introduced; Y^{s,b} and Z^{s,b} are function spaces used as proof devices. The main external input is Proposition 2.3 from [35].

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Standard X^{s,b} machinery: reduction of wellposedness to the bilinear estimates (1.7), short-time norms (1.5), and embedding X^{s,b}_T and Y^{s,b}_T into C([0,T];H^s) for b>1/2.
    Used throughout Section 2; standard dispersive PDE background, cited to [2,23,45] and textbooks.
  • domain assumption Molinet-Pilod bilinear estimates (Proposition 2.3, inequalities (2.14) and (2.15)).
    Imported without proof from [35]; used in Cases 2 and 3 of Section 2.2 and later in probabilistic estimates. This is an external theorem, not derived in this paper.
  • standard math Randomization setup: iid complex Gaussians with exponential tails, generic data bound (1.9), and Markov/Borel-Cantelli arguments for almost sure statements.
    Used in Section 3 to set up randomized data and to pass from L2_omega bounds to almost sure bounds, following [2,4,11,12,34].
  • domain assumption Low-frequency condition for Theorem 1.4: initial data lie in the weighted space H^s with norm (1.4), and Remark 1.1 identifies a natural subclass of H^s with cancellation and x1-decay.
    This is an explicit hypothesis of Theorem 1.4; it is not proved to be necessary for wellposedness, only for the current proof and for optimality of (1.7).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Low regularity analysis of the Zakharov--Kuznetsov equation on $\mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{T}$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/3G63R6XP

@misc{pith2026250201818,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Low regularity analysis of the Zakharov--Kuznetsov equation on $\mathbbR \times \mathbbT$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/3G63R6XP}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.01818}
}
abstract

We consider the Cauchy problem for the Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation in the cylinder. We improve the local wellposedness to spaces of regularity $s > 1/2$. The result is optimal in terms of the corresponding bilinear estimate or Picard iteration. Our method is based on an improvement of the understanding of the resonant set, identifying and exploiting its particular geometric properties. We also consider the problem under randomization of the initial data, in which case we obtain solutions for generic data in $H^{s}$ for some $s < 0$. To do so, we consider a novel approach based on lower regularity modifications of the classical $X^{s, b}$ spaces that allow to control concentration of mass in small sets of frequencies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.01818 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Diagram showing frequencies in Sbad, which corresponds to the main resonance. Each frequency vector should lie in the corresponding box, and the picture is up to rearrangement of the frequencies. In such configuration, we have that |∆| “ |φpν, kq ` φpζ, mq ` φpξ, nq| À 1. The resonance occurs around the triple cancellation ∆ “ Bν∆ “ Bζ∆ “ 0. 1.3 Probabilistic result Now, we look to further improve the deterministic … view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Frequency space representation of Proposition [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Illustration of Lemma 2.5. The vectors w1, w2 and w3 (shown in blue, red and green respectively) add up to zero and have approximately equal lengths. w2 and w3 must lie in the dashed balls centered at R˘2π{3pw1q. We pass |w1| 2 subtracting to the left hand side and use that ˇ ˇ |w1| 2 ´ |w3| 2 ˇ ˇ “ ||w1| ´ |w3|| ¨ p|w1| ` |w3|q ď 5 2 |w1|E. Dividing by 2|w1||w2|, we obtain that ˇ ˇ ˇ ˇ w1 ¨ w2 |w1||w2| ` |w2| 2|w1|… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: The region RM (shaded) consists of OpMq-neighborhoods of three lines p0, tq, p´t{2, ´t{2q, and pt{2, ´t{2q, restricted to the annulus between radii Nmin and 8Nmin. We also have covered RM with squares of size cM. In order to improve the clarity of the picture, it is no…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Well-posedness Results f or the Modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov Equation

    H. A. Biagioni and F. Linares. “Well-posedness Results f or the Modified Zakharov-Kuznetsov Equation”. In: Nonlinear Equations: Methods, Models and Applications . Birkh¨ auser Basel, 2003, 181–189

    work page 2003

  2. [2]

    Fourier transform restriction phenomena for certain lattice subsets and applications to nonlinear evolution equations: Part I: Schr¨ odinger equations

    J. Bourgain. “Fourier transform restriction phenomena for certain lattice subsets and applications to nonlinear evolution equations: Part I: Schr¨ odinger equations”. In: Geometric and Functional Analysis 3(2) (1993), 107– 156

    work page 1993

  3. [3]

    Periodic Korteweg de Vries equation with m easures as initial data

    J. Bourgain. “Periodic Korteweg de Vries equation with m easures as initial data”. In: Selecta Mathematica 3(2) (1997), 115–159

    work page 1997

  4. [4]

    Invariant measures for the 2D-defocusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation

    J. Bourgain. “Invariant measures for the 2D-defocusing nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation”. In: Communications in Mathematical Physics 176(2) (1996), 421–445

    work page 1996

  5. [5]

    Invarian t Gibbs measures for the three dimensional cubic nonlinear wave equation

    B. Bringmann, Y . Deng, A. R. Nahmod, and H. Y ue. “Invarian t Gibbs measures for the three dimensional cubic nonlinear wave equation”. In: Inventiones mathematicae 236(3) (2024), 1133–1411. 45

    work page 2024

  6. [6]

    Random data Cauchy theory for su percritical wave equations I: local theory

    N. Burq and N. Tzvetkov. “Random data Cauchy theory for su percritical wave equations I: local theory”. In: Inventiones mathematicae 173 (2008), 449–475

    work page 2008

  7. [7]

    Random data Cauchy theory for su percritical wave equations II: A global existence result

    N. Burq and N. Tzvetkov. “Random data Cauchy theory for su percritical wave equations II: A global existence result”. In: Inventiones mathematicae 173(3) (2008), 477–496

    work page 2008

  8. [8]

    Caffarelli and W

    L. Caffarelli and W . E. Hyperbolic Equations and Frequency Interactions . IAS/Park City mathematics series. American Mathematical Society, Institute for Advanced Stu dy, 1999

    work page 1999

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    Pointwise Conve rgence of the Schr¨ odinger Flow

    E. Compaan, R. Luc` a, and G. Staffilani. “Pointwise Conve rgence of the Schr¨ odinger Flow”. In: International Mathematics Research Notices 2021(1) (2020), 596–647

    2020

  2. [10]

    Sharp local existence and nonl inear smoothing for dispersive equations with higher- order nonlinearities

    S. Correia and P . Leite. “Sharp local existence and nonl inear smoothing for dispersive equations with higher- order nonlinearities”. In: arXiv:2412.11808 (2024)

    2024 arXiv

  3. [11]

    Invariant Gibbs measure s and global strong solutions for nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations in dimension two

    Y . Deng, A. Nahmod, and H. Y ue. “Invariant Gibbs measure s and global strong solutions for nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations in dimension two”. In: Annals of Mathematics 200(2) (2024), 399–486

    2024

  4. [12]

    Random tensors, propa gation of randomness, and nonlinear dispersive equations

    Y . Deng, A. R. Nahmod, and H. Y ue. “Random tensors, propa gation of randomness, and nonlinear dispersive equations”. In: Inventiones mathematicae 228(2) (2022), 539–686

    2022

  5. [13]

    The Cauchy problem for the Zakharov–K uznetsov equation

    A. V . Faminskii. “The Cauchy problem for the Zakharov–K uznetsov equation”. In: Differentsial’nye Urav- neniya 31(6) (1995), 1070–1081

    1995

  6. [14]

    A note on the 2D ge neralized Zakharov–Kuznetsov equation: Local, global, and scattering results

    L. G. Farah, F. Linares, and A. Pastor. “A note on the 2D ge neralized Zakharov–Kuznetsov equation: Local, global, and scattering results”. In: Journal of Differential Equations 253(8) (2012), 2558–2571

    2012

  7. [15]

    A note on the well-posedness in the energy space for the generalized ZK equation posed on R ˆ T

    L. G. Farah and L. Molinet. “A note on the well-posedness in the energy space for the generalized ZK equation posed on R ˆ T”. In: arXiv:2306.07433 (2023)

    2023

  8. [16]

    A remark on the modified Zakharov-Kuznet sov equation in three space dimensions

    A. Gr¨ unrock. “A remark on the modified Zakharov-Kuznet sov equation in three space dimensions”. In: Mathe- matical Research Letters 21(1) (2014), 127–131

    2014

  9. [17]

    An improved local well-posedness resul t for the modified KdV equation

    A. Gr¨ unrock. “An improved local well-posedness resul t for the modified KdV equation”. In: International Mathematics Research Notices 2004(61) (2004), 3287–3308

    2004

  10. [18]

    On the generalized Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation at critical regularity

    A. Gr¨ unrock. “On the generalized Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation at critical regularity”. In: arXiv:1509.09146 (2015)

    2015 arXiv

  11. [19]

    Low Regularity Local Well-Po sedness of the Derivative Nonlinear Schr¨ odinger Equation with Periodic Initial Data

    A. Gr¨ unrock and S. Herr. “Low Regularity Local Well-Po sedness of the Derivative Nonlinear Schr¨ odinger Equation with Periodic Initial Data”. In: SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 39(6) (2008), 1890–1920

    2008

  12. [20]

    The Fourier restriction norm method for the Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation

    A. Gr¨ unrock and S. Herr. “The Fourier restriction norm method for the Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation”. In: Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems 34(5) (2014), 2061–2068

    2014

  13. [21]

    The Zakharov–Kuznetsov equa tion in high dimensions: small initial data of critical regularity

    S. Herr and S. Kinoshita. “The Zakharov–Kuznetsov equa tion in high dimensions: small initial data of critical regularity”. In: Journal of Evolution Equations 21 (2021), 2105–2121

    2021

  14. [22]

    The Cauchy problem for the generalized Zakhar ov–Kuznetsov equation on modulation spaces

    T. Kato. “The Cauchy problem for the generalized Zakhar ov–Kuznetsov equation on modulation spaces”. In: Journal of Differential Equations 264(5) (2018), 3402–3444

    2018

  15. [23]

    Well-posedness of th e initial value problem for the Korteweg-de Vries equation

    C. E. Kenig, G. Ponce, and L. V ega. “Well-posedness of th e initial value problem for the Korteweg-de Vries equation”. In: Journal of the American Mathematical Society 4(2) (1991), 323–347

    1991

  16. [24]

    Global well-posedness for the Cauchy pr oblem of the Zakharov–Kuznetsov equation in 2D

    S. Kinoshita. “Global well-posedness for the Cauchy pr oblem of the Zakharov–Kuznetsov equation in 2D”. In: Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar ´e C, Analyse non lin ´eaire 38(2) (2021), 451–505

    2021

  17. [25]

    Loomis-Whitney-type ine qualities and low regularity well-posedness of the pe- riodic Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation

    S. Kinoshita and R. Schippa. “Loomis-Whitney-type ine qualities and low regularity well-posedness of the pe- riodic Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation”. In: Journal of Functional Analysis 280(6) (2021), 108904

    2021

  18. [26]

    Nonlinear ion-acoust ic waves in weak magnetic fields

    E. W . Laedke and K. H. Spatschek. “Nonlinear ion-acoust ic waves in weak magnetic fields”. In: The Physics of Fluids 25(6) (1982), 985–989

    1982

  19. [27]

    The Cauchy probl em for the Euler–Poisson system and derivation of the Zakharov–Kuznetsov equation

    D. Lannes, F. Linares, and J.-C. Saut. “The Cauchy probl em for the Euler–Poisson system and derivation of the Zakharov–Kuznetsov equation”. In: Studies in phase space analysis with applications to PDEs (2013), 181– 213

    2013

  20. [28]

    On t he periodic Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation

    F. Linares, M. Panthee, T. Robert, and N. Tzvetkov. “On t he periodic Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation”. In: Dis- crete and Continuous Dynamical Systems 39(6) (2019), 3521–3533. 46

    2019

  21. [29]

    Local and global well-posedn ess for the 2D generalized Zakharov–Kuznetsov equa- tion

    F. Linares and A. Pastor. “Local and global well-posedn ess for the 2D generalized Zakharov–Kuznetsov equa- tion”. In: Journal of Functional Analysis 260(4) (2011), 1060–1085

    2011

  22. [30]

    Well-posedness for the two-d imensional modified Zakharov–Kuznetsov equation

    F. Linares and A. Pastor. “Well-posedness for the two-d imensional modified Zakharov–Kuznetsov equation”. In: SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 41(4) (2009), 1323–1339

    2009

  23. [31]

    Well-Posedness for the ZK Equation in a Cylinder and on the Background of a KdV Soliton

    F. Linares, A. Pastor, and J.-C. Saut. “Well-Posedness for the ZK Equation in a Cylinder and on the Background of a KdV Soliton”. In: Communications in Partial Differential Equations 35(9) (2010), 1674–1689

    2010

  24. [32]

    The Cauchy problem for the L2–critical generalized Zakharov-Kuznetsov equa- tion in dimension 3

    F. Linares and J. P . G. Ramos. “The Cauchy problem for the L2–critical generalized Zakharov-Kuznetsov equa- tion in dimension 3”. In: Communications in Partial Differential Equations 46(9) (2021), 1601–1627

    2021

  25. [33]

    The Cauchy problem for the 3D Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation

    F. Linares and J.-C. Saut. “The Cauchy problem for the 3D Zakharov-Kuznetsov equation”. In: Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems 24(2) (2009), 547–565

    2009

  26. [34]

    Random Data Cauchy Theo ry for Nonlinear Wave Equations of Power-Type on R3

    J. L¨ uhrmann and D. Mendelson. “Random Data Cauchy Theo ry for Nonlinear Wave Equations of Power-Type on R3”. In: Communications in Partial Differential Equations 39(12) (2014), 2262–2283

    2014

  27. [35]

    Bilinear Strichartz estimate s for the Zakharov–Kuznetsov equation and applications

    L. Molinet and D. Pilod. “Bilinear Strichartz estimate s for the Zakharov–Kuznetsov equation and applications”. In: Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincar ´e C, Analyse non lin ´eaire 32(2) (2015), 347–371

    2015

  28. [36]

    Almost sure well-posednes s for the periodic 3D quintic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation below the energy space

    A. Nahmod and G. Staffilani. “Almost sure well-posednes s for the periodic 3D quintic nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equation below the energy space”. In: Journal of the European Mathematical Society 17(7) (2015), 1687–1759

    2015

  29. [37]

    In variant weighted Wiener measures and almost sure global well-posedness for the periodic derivative NLS

    A. R. Nahmod, T. Oh, L. Rey-Bellet, and G. Staffilani. “In variant weighted Wiener measures and almost sure global well-posedness for the periodic derivative NLS”. In : Journal of the European Mathematical Society 14(4) (2012), 1275–1330

    2012

  30. [38]

    On the probabilist ic well-posedness of the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations with non-algebraic nonlinearities

    T. Oh, M. Okamoto, and O. Pocovnicu. “On the probabilist ic well-posedness of the nonlinear Schr¨ odinger equations with non-algebraic nonlinearities”. In: Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems 39(6) (2019), 3479–3520

    2019

  31. [39]

    Solving the 4NLS with wh ite noise initial data

    T. Oh, N. Tzvetkov, and Y . Wang. “Solving the 4NLS with wh ite noise initial data”. In: F orum of Mathematics, Sigma. V ol. 8. Cambridge University Press. 2020, e48

    2020

  32. [40]

    Local well-posedness for the Zakharov-Kuzn etsov equation in Sobolev spaces

    S. Osawa. “Local well-posedness for the Zakharov-Kuzn etsov equation in Sobolev spaces”. In: arXiv:2207.04657 (2022)

    2022 arXiv

  33. [41]

    Global well-posedness for Cau chy problems of Zakharov–Kuznetsov equations on cylindrical spaces

    S. Osawa and H. Takaoka. “Global well-posedness for Cau chy problems of Zakharov–Kuznetsov equations on cylindrical spaces”. In: Electronic Journal of Differential Equations 2024(05) (2024), 1–25

    2024

  34. [42]

    A Note on the Cauchy problem for t he 2D generalized Zakharov–Kuznetsov equa- tions

    F. Ribaud and S. V ento. “A Note on the Cauchy problem for t he 2D generalized Zakharov–Kuznetsov equa- tions”. In: Comptes Rendus. Math ´ematique 350(9–10) (2012), 499–503

    2012

  35. [43]

    Well-Posedness Results for the Three-Dimensional Zakharov–Kuznetsov Equation

    F. Ribaud and S. V ento. “Well-Posedness Results for the Three-Dimensional Zakharov–Kuznetsov Equation”. In: SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis 44(4) (2012), 2289–2304

    2012

  36. [44]

    On the Cauchy problem for higher dimension al Benjamin-Ono and Zakharov-Kuznetsov equa- tions

    R. Schippa. “On the Cauchy problem for higher dimension al Benjamin-Ono and Zakharov-Kuznetsov equa- tions”. In: Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems 40(9) (2020), 5189–5215

    2020

  37. [45]

    Nonlinear Dispersive Equations

    T. Tao. “Nonlinear Dispersive Equations”. In: CBMS Regional Conference Series in Mathematics . V ol. 106. American Mathematical Society. 2006

    2006

  38. [46]

    Three-dimensional solitons

    V . E. Zakharov and K. E. A. “Three-dimensional solitons ”. In: Soviet Physics JETP 39(2) (1974), 285–286. 47

    1974

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.