Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 164 references

Dispersion of neutral collective modes in partonic fractional quantum Hall states and its applications to paired states of composite fermions

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Parton wave functions for the anti-Pfaffian state put the magnetoroton and neutral fermion nearly degenerate at long wavelengths for second Landau level Coulomb interactions.

desk verdict Solid parton construction for aPf neutral modes with an honest SUSY test; the all-q validation claim is under-supported by the shown evidence. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.02686 v2 pith:XGG2D5RO submitted 2025-02-04 cond-mat.str-el

Koyena Bose , Ajit C. Balram This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords fractionalquantumHalleffectpartontheoryanti-PfaffianstateneutralfermionmodemagnetorotonsupersymmetrycompositefermionssecondLandaulevel
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

At filling factor 5/2, two low-lying neutral excitations of the Moore-Read Pfaffian family are conjectured to be supersymmetric partners: the bosonic magnetoroton (the density-wave mode) and the neutral fermion (a fermionic mode), with equal energy gaps in the long-wavelength limit. This paper tests that conjecture for the anti-Pfaffian, the particle-hole conjugate of the Pfaffian, using parton wave functions obtained by placing a particle-hole pair in the same or in different factors of a $\Phi_{-2}$ parton. Unlike earlier trial states, these wave functions can be evaluated for systems up to roughly 30 to 40 electrons, so the long-wavelength gaps can be reliably extrapolated to the thermodynamic limit. For the second Landau level Coulomb interaction the extrapolated gaps of the two modes approach each other, indicating that an emergent supersymmetry point lies near the second Landau level Coulomb interaction. The same construction is then applied to a catalogue of other Abelian and non-Abelian parton states and to the composite fermion Fermi liquid at quarter filling.

What carries the argument

The machinery is the parton construction of trial wave functions. Parton theory splits each electron into fictitious particles filling integer Landau levels, so the ground state is a projected product of Slater determinants; at $\nu=1/2$ the state $\bar{2}\bar{2}111$ lies in the anti-Pfaffian universality class. Neutral excitations are generated by creating a particle-hole pair: placing both in the same $\Phi_{-2}$ factor gives the magnetoroton (starting at total orbital angular momentum L=2), while placing them in different $\Phi_{-2}$ factors gives the neutral fermion (starting at L=3/2). The projected forms factorize into composite-fermion exciton wave functions, which can be evaluated by Jain-Kamilla projection for large systems. The operational supersymmetry test is whether the L=2 and L=3/2 gaps coincide as momentum $q\to 0$.

What would settle it

Compute the exact second Landau level Coulomb low-energy spectrum at intermediate angular momenta for N=14 to 20 and compare the lowest states with the parton trial wave functions; if the overlaps drop substantially or another state appears below the trial dispersion at intermediate q, the conclusion that a supersymmetric interaction lies near the second Landau level Coulomb interaction would not be supported for the real system.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that the parton wave functions in Eqs. (3) and (4) describe the magnetoroton and neutral fermion modes of the anti-Pfaffian universality class across the full range of wave numbers, not just in the long-wavelength limit. Supporting evidence is given by overlaps of 0.87 for the L=2 magnetoroton at N=12 and 0.91 for the L=3/2 neutral fermion at N=13 with particle-hole-conjugated Jack states of the Pfaffian, and by dispersion curves computed for systems up to N=30. For the second Landau level Coulomb interaction, the thermodynamic extrapolations of the $q\to 0$ gaps come close, so the paper concludes that a supersymmetric interaction likely lies near the second Landau level Coulomb interaction, while exact supersymmetry would still require fine-tuning the Hamiltonian. The same construction is extended to several other parton states, and a parton-exciton ansatz is proposed for the gapped neutral mode of the composite fermion Fermi liquid at $\nu=1/4$.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the trial wave functions in Eqs. (3) and (4) are the true low-lying neutral modes of the second Landau level Coulomb system at all wave numbers, a premise supported only by overlaps of 0.87 at L=2 and 0.91 at L=3/2; if the exact modes mix with other excitations at intermediate momenta, the computed gap difference and the supersymmetry conclusion would not transfer to the real system.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The parton wave functions provide a numerically tractable way to compute neutral-mode dispersions in the anti-Pfaffian class at all wave numbers, a regime earlier trial states could not reach.
  • If the conclusion is correct, the fine-tuned supersymmetry found near the Pfaffian has an analogue on the particle-hole-conjugate side, and the second Landau level Coulomb interaction sits close to, but not exactly at, the supersymmetric point.
  • For Read-Rezayi k≥3 states, the construction predicts no neutral-fermion analogue on the sphere, marking the Pfaffian (k=2) as the only member of the series with two low-lying neutral modes.
  • The dispersions and clustering properties catalogued for states such as $\bar{3}\bar{2}214$, $\bar{2}314$, $4\bar{2}13$, 2213, and 2215 give concrete predictions for multiple graviton modes and their chiralities.
  • The parton-exciton ansatz at $\nu=1/4$ gives a gapped graviton whose long-wavelength energy matches the spectral-function peak, providing a candidate interpretation for the gapped neutral mode of the quarter-filled composite fermion Fermi liquid.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the parton trial states remain faithful at intermediate wave numbers, the closeness of the two gaps at $q\to 0$ makes the second Landau level Coulomb interaction a natural starting point for tuning an exact supersymmetric Hamiltonian, and the required tuning might be as simple as adjusting the V1 Haldane pseudopotential.
  • The no-neutral-fermion result for k≥3 suggests an experimental discriminator: a Read-Rezayi candidate with k≥3 that shows two low-lying neutral modes cannot be described by the parton construction in Eq. (8).
  • The parton-exciton ansatz at $\nu=1/4$ could be tested in wide quantum wells by inelastic light scattering or microwave absorption; observing a gapped dispersing mode at the predicted energy would support the parton content of the quarter-filled Fermi liquid.
  • The overlap evidence is thin at intermediate angular momenta, so exact diagonalization for systems near N=20 at L values between 2 and N/2 would test whether the trial states are the true second Landau level Coulomb modes.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper constructs parton wave functions for the magnetoroton and neutral fermion modes of the anti-Pfaffian (aPf) universality class at filling 5/2, evaluates their dispersions for large systems using Monte Carlo, and finds that their long-wavelength gaps approach each other for the second Landau level Coulomb interaction, suggesting an emergent supersymmetry near that point. The construction is then generalized to a variety of Abelian and non-Abelian parton states, with dispersions, clustering properties, and chiralities of the collective modes discussed, and a parton-exciton ansatz is proposed for the gapped neutral mode of the composite fermion Fermi liquid at 1/4.

Significance. If the mode identification is correct, this work provides a numerically tractable tool for studying neutral collective modes of paired and other partonic fractional quantum Hall states at system sizes far beyond previous approaches, and it offers a concrete test of the SUSY conjecture for the anti-Pfaffian. The paper's strengths include large-N Monte Carlo evaluation with stated chain statistics, thermodynamic extrapolations, explicit overlap checks with Jack states, and a broad set of falsifiable predictions for dispersions of collective modes. The main uncertainties are the limited validation of the trial modes against exact eigenstates at intermediate wave numbers and the unquantified interpolation used for the odd-electron ground-state energy in the neutral fermion gap.

major comments (3)
  1. [Sec. II B and II C] The identification of the wave functions in Eqs. (3) and (4) as the physical magnetoroton and neutral fermion modes of the SLL Coulomb system at all wave numbers rests on overlaps of 0.87 (L=2, N=12) and 0.91 (L=3/2, N=13) with particle-hole-conjugated Jack states. These are only at the smallest accessible angular momenta and are not overlaps with exact SLL Coulomb eigenstates. The statement in Sec. II C that 'the agreement between the above trial wave functions and the exact states (not shown here) is similar to ...' is not quantified. Since the SUSY conclusion compares two variational upper bounds in the long-wavelength limit, the absence of exact-diagonalization comparisons at intermediate L leaves open the possibility that the true gaps do not approach each other. Please provide overlaps with exact SLL Coulomb eigenstates for accessible system sizes at several L values, or otherwise bound the variational error.
  2. [Sec. II C, paragraph 2] The neutral fermion gap at 5/2 requires the ground-state energy for an odd number of particles, which is obtained by interpolating the ground-state energies of even-particle systems. The systematic error from this interpolation is neither quantified nor shown. Because the thermodynamic extrapolation in Fig. 3 is central to the SUSY conclusion, this missing error estimate is a load-bearing gap. Please display the odd-N data, the interpolation curve, and an estimate of the interpolation uncertainty (for example, by comparing against exact odd-N ground-state energies at small N where they are available).
  3. [Sec. II B and Sec. VII (Discussion)] The paper repeatedly claims that the parton wave functions 'can provide a good description of the modes at all wave numbers' and that they are 'valid across all wave numbers'. The numerical evidence shown is limited to the long-wavelength limit. This overclaim is not essential for the long-wavelength SUSY test, but it is a central selling point of the construction. Either provide supporting evidence (e.g., overlaps with exact eigenstates or spectral functions at finite q) or temper the claim to avoid overstating the validated range of validity.
minor comments (4)
  1. [Sec. II B] The overlap comparisons involve particle-hole conjugation on the sphere, which maps a state with N particles at flux 2Q to a state with 2Q+1-N particles; this convention should be stated explicitly for clarity.
  2. [Fig. 3] The fit lines and error bars are described, but the fit parameters and goodness-of-fit (e.g., chi-squared) are not given; please include them to support the thermodynamic extrapolation.
  3. [Eq. (7)] The coefficients B1, B3, B5, and C0-C6 are taken from Ref. [80] but are not listed; providing them or a pointer to a table would make the effective interaction self-contained.
  4. [Sec. IV C] The discussion of the possible counterexample to the inversion-symmetry claim of Ref. [125] is interesting but appears tangential to the main results; consider moving it to a footnote or an appendix.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the central SUSY test compares two independently constructed trial wave functions; gap equality is not imposed by construction.

full rationale

The paper's central claim is a computed comparison of two trial wave functions, Eqs. (3) and (4), built by placing a particle-hole pair in the same versus different Phi_{-2} factors of the 2213 parton state. These wave functions are constructed from the parton ansatz, not fitted to the SLL Coulomb gaps; the gaps are evaluated as expectation values of the effective SLL Coulomb interaction, Eqs. (5)-(7), and their near-degeneracy in the q->0 limit is reported rather than enforced. The parton ground state itself is taken from prior work by one of the authors [36], but that prior construction is independent input, not a quantity the paper claims to derive, and its topological identification with the anti-Pfaffian is supported by earlier entanglement-spectrum studies. The overlaps of 0.87 and 0.91 with PH-conjugated Jack states are used as validation of the trial modes at L=2 and L=3/2, not as fitted inputs that force the SUSY conclusion. The paper explicitly notes that the wave functions do not have SUSY built in, and it reports different long-wavelength gaps for LLL Coulomb, showing the comparison is not trivially controlled by the ansatz. The only substantive concern, that intermediate-wave-number fidelity is inferred from only two small-system overlaps, is a numerical-support weakness rather than a circular step: no derived quantity is equivalent by construction to an input, and no load-bearing argument reduces to an unverified self-citation. The manuscript is therefore self-contained with respect to the circularity concern, and the appropriate finding is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No new particles, forces, or dimensions are posited. The main external inputs are prior parton-state universalities, the Jain-Kamilla projection, and the fitted effective interaction. The paper's own assumptions are the variational identification of the trial wave functions with the collective modes and the interpolation of odd-N ground-state energies.

free parameters (1)
  • Effective interaction coefficients (B1, B3, B5, C0-C6) = taken from Ref. [80]
    Eq. (7) represents SLL Coulomb pseudopotentials in the LLL; the coefficients were fitted in prior work, not determined here. They are inputs to the central gap comparison.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Parton mapping: an electron wave function is the LLL-projected product of integer quantum Hall Slater determinants, with parton charges q_lambda = nu e / n_lambda.
    Invoked in Eq. (1) and throughout as the foundation of parton theory (Ref. [40]).
  • domain assumption Jain-Kamilla projection preserves the universality class and causes only minor quantitative differences compared with exact LLL projection.
    Used to make all wave functions evaluable for large N; the paper relies on Refs. [67,70,71] for this.
  • domain assumption The parton state 2213 at nu=1/2 lies in the same universality class as the anti-Pfaffian and is a good microscopic representation of the 5/2 Coulomb ground state.
    Taken from Refs. [36,39]; this equivalence is what makes the SUSY test meaningful for the aPf phase.
  • ad hoc to paper The trial wave functions in Eqs. (3) and (4) represent the magnetoroton and neutral fermion modes at all wave numbers.
    The identification is supported only by small-system overlaps (0.87 for L=2, 0.91 for L=3/2) with Jack states; no proof is given for intermediate momenta.
  • ad hoc to paper The odd-N ground-state energy needed for the neutral fermion gap can be obtained by interpolating even-N ground-state energies.
    Stated in Sec. II B; the resulting systematic uncertainty is not quantified.
  • domain assumption The effective interaction of Eq. (7) reproduces SLL Coulomb pseudopotentials in the LLL.
    Standard mapping introduced by Shi et al. (Ref. [80]); used to evaluate LLL wave functions at SLL interaction.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Dispersion of neutral collective modes in partonic fractional quantum Hall states and its applications to paired states of composite fermions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/XGG2D5RO

@misc{pith2026250202686,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Dispersion of neutral collective modes in partonic fractional quantum Hall states and its applications to paired states of composite fermions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/XGG2D5RO}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.02686}
}
read the original abstract

The Moore-Read Pfaffian (Pf) state exhibits two distinct neutral excitation modes, the bosonic magnetoroton mode, and the neutral fermion mode. These two modes have been conjectured to be supersymmetric (SUSY) partners in the long-wavelength limit. Previous studies on these neutral excitations of the Pf state have shown evidence in favor of SUSY in the vicinity of the second Landau level (SLL) Coulomb interaction. Inspired by that, using the framework of parton theory, we test the SUSY conjecture for a state that lies in the same universality class as the particle-hole conjugate of the Pf, namely the anti-Pf (aPf) state, by constructing explicit wave functions for its magnetoroton and neutral fermion excitations and evaluating them for very large system sizes. As with the previous studies on the Pf state, we find that the long-wavelength gaps of the neutral modes of the parton state belonging to the same topological class as the aPf are close to each other for the SLL Coulomb interaction. Furthermore, using the parton wave functions, we compute the dispersion of various neutral collective excitations, including the magnetoroton, neutral fermion, and parton-excitons, for several notable non-Abelian and Abelian states. Finally, we propose a parton-exciton ansatz for the gapped neutral excitation of the composite fermion Fermi liquid at quarter filling and compute its dispersion for the Coulomb interaction in the lowest Landau level.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.02686 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. FIG. 2 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: FIG. 7 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_7.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

164 extracted references · 57 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Clustering properties of the modes Because of the presence of the Pfaffian factor, the clus- tering properties of the collective modes involve three- particle clusters. Let us consider the two modes sepa- rately as follows: • Primary exciton: when two particles are brought close to each other, the primary magnetoroton de- scribed by the wave function give...

  2. [2]

    (14) is an exact highest- density zero-energy ground state

    (14) Unlike the Pf state, no local Hamiltonian is known for which the wave function of Eq. (14) is an exact highest- density zero-energy ground state. However, for the un- projected version of the state, the Trugman-Kivelson [96] Hamiltonian acting on electrons residing in the two low- est LLs produces this state [45]. On the sphere, the 2 21p state occur...

  3. [3]

    (15) For p≥2, this exciton can alternately be projected into the LLL as ΨCFE 2/5 ΨJain 2/5 Φp−4 1 , where ΨJain 2/5 =PLLLΦ2Φ2 1 and ΨCFE 2/5 =PLLLΦexciton 2 Φ2

  4. [4]

    9 The wave function for the secondary exciton, which as in the Pf state only exists for p≥2, is given by Ψ221p,second−exciton 1/(p+1) = PLLLΦ2 2Φexciton 1 Φp−1 1

    The parton hosting the exciton carries a charge of magnitude e/[2(p+1)]. 9 The wave function for the secondary exciton, which as in the Pf state only exists for p≥2, is given by Ψ221p,second−exciton 1/(p+1) = PLLLΦ2 2Φexciton 1 Φp−1 1 . (16) For p≥4, this exciton can alternately be projected into the LLL as [Ψ Jain 2/5 ]2ΨCFE 1/2 Φp−6 1 . The parton hosti...

  5. [5]

    As with the Pf, the neutral fermion mode occurs for odd N at the ground state, following the flux-particle relationship 2 Q=(p+1)N −(p+4)

    (17) For p≥2, this mode can be projected into the LLL as ΨCFP 2/5 ΨCFH 2/5 Φp−4 1 . As with the Pf, the neutral fermion mode occurs for odd N at the ground state, following the flux-particle relationship 2 Q=(p+1)N −(p+4)

  6. [6]

    (15), vanishes as rp−2

    Clustering properties of the modes We assume p≥4 and consider the modes separately as follows: • Primary exciton: when two particles separated by a distance r are brought close to each other, the pri- mary exciton described by the wave function given in Eq. (15), vanishes as rp−2. • Secondary exciton: the secondary exciton de- scribed by the wave function...

  7. [7]

    The 2 213 state is described by the wave function Ψ2213 1/4 = PLLLΦ2Φ2Φ3 1 ∼ [ΨJain 2/5 ]2 Φ1

    2213 state at ν=1/4 An FQHE state has been observed at filling factor ν=1/4 in wide quantum wells [97–100] and the 2 213 par- ton state is the most plausible candidate to describe the ground state [54]. The 2 213 state is described by the wave function Ψ2213 1/4 = PLLLΦ2Φ2Φ3 1 ∼ [ΨJain 2/5 ]2 Φ1 . (18) In Table II, we present the overlaps of the above sta...

  8. [8]

    2215 state at ν=1/6 N |⟨Ψ221 1 2 ΨL 1 4 |Ψ0LL 1 6 ⟩|2 |⟨ h ΨJ 2 5 i2 Φ1|Ψ0LL 1 6 ⟩|2 |⟨Ψ221 1 2 ΨL 1 4 | h ΨJ 2 5 i2 Φ1⟩|2 4 0.9684 0.9037 0.7748 6 0.9006 0.9241 0.8113 8 0.9369 0.9117 0.7586 T ABLE III: Same as Table II but for the 2 215 state at ν=1/6. Next, we consider the 2 215 state that occurs at ν=1/6 and for which wave functions for all three neut...

Show all 164 references
  1. [9]

    (27), vanishes as r, where r is their interparticle spacing

    Clustering properties of the modes Consider the two modes separately as follows: • Primary exciton: when two particles are brought close to each other, the primary exciton described by the wave function given in Eq. (27), vanishes as r, where r is their interparticle spacing. ...

  2. [10]

    (33), vanishes as r, where r is their interparticle spacing

    Clustering properties of the modes Consider the two modes separately as follows: • Primary exciton of the 2/5 BS state: – when two particles are brought close to each other, the primary exciton described by the wave function given in Eq. (33), vanishes as r, where r is their i...

    2023

  3. [11]

    D. C. Tsui, H. L. Stormer, and A. C. Gossard, Two- dimensional magnetotransport in the extreme quantum limit, Phys. Rev. Lett. 48, 1559 (1982)

    1982

  4. [12]

    B. I. Halperin, Statistics of quasiparticles and the hi- erarchy of fractional quantized Hall states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1583 (1984)

    1984

  5. [13]

    Arovas, J

    D. Arovas, J. R. Schrieffer, and F. Wilczek, Fractional statistics and the quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 722 (1984)

    1984

  6. [14]

    Leinaas and J

    J. Leinaas and J. Myrheim, On the theory of identical particles, Il Nuovo Cimento B Series 11 37, 1 (1977)

    1977

  7. [15]

    Wilczek, Quantum mechanics of fractional-spin par- ticles, Phys

    F. Wilczek, Quantum mechanics of fractional-spin par- ticles, Phys. Rev. Lett. 49, 957 (1982)

    1982

  8. [16]

    R. B. Laughlin, Anomalous quantum Hall effect: An incompressible quantum fluid with fractionally charged excitations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 50, 1395 (1983)

    1983

  9. [17]

    Kjønsberg and J

    H. Kjønsberg and J. Myrheim, Numerical study of charge and statistics of Laughlin quasiparticles, Inter- national Journal of Modern Physics A 14, 537 (1999)

    1999

  10. [18]

    Kjønsberg and J

    H. Kjønsberg and J. M. Leinaas, Charge and statistics of quantum Hall quasi-particles. a numerical study of mean values and fluctuations, Nucl. Phys. B 559, 705 (1999)

    1999

  11. [19]

    G. S. Jeon, K. L. Graham, and J. K. Jain, Fractional statistics in the fractional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 036801 (2003)

    2003

  12. [20]

    G. S. Jeon, K. L. Graham, and J. K. Jain, Berry phases for composite fermions: Effective magnetic field and fractional statistics, Phys. Rev. B 70, 125316 (2004)

    2004

  13. [21]

    Bose and A

    K. Bose and A. C. Balram, Numerical demonstration of Abelian fractional statistics of composite fermion ex- citations in the spherical geometry, Phys. Rev. B 110, 045148 (2024)

    2024

  14. [22]

    Nakamura, S

    J. Nakamura, S. Liang, G. C. Gardner, and M. J. Man- fra, Direct observation of anyonic braiding statistics, Nature Physics 16, 931 (2020)

    2020

  15. [23]

    Bartolomei, M

    H. Bartolomei, M. Kumar, R. Bisognin, A. Marguerite, J.-M. Berroir, E. Bocquillon, B. Pla¸ cais, A. Cavanna, Q. Dong, U. Gennser, Y. Jin, and G. F` eve, Fractional statistics in anyon collisions, Science 368, 173 (2020), 16 https://science.sciencemag.org/content/368/6487/173.full.pdf

    2020

  16. [24]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Geometrical description of the frac- tional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett.107, 116801 (2011)

    2011

  17. [25]

    S. M. Girvin, A. H. MacDonald, and P. M. Platzman, Collective-excitation gap in the fractional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 581 (1985)

    1985

  18. [26]

    S. M. Girvin, A. H. MacDonald, and P. M. Platzman, Magneto-roton theory of collective excitations in the fractional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 33, 2481 (1986)

    1986

  19. [27]

    Pinczuk, B

    A. Pinczuk, B. S. Dennis, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. West, Observation of collective excitations in the fractional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 70, 3983 (1993)

    1993

  20. [28]

    M. Kang, A. Pinczuk, B. S. Dennis, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Observation of multiple magnetorotons in the fractional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2637 (2001)

    2001

  21. [29]

    I. V. Kukushkin, J. H. Smet, V. W. Scarola, V. Umansky, and K. von Klitzing, Disper- sion of the excitations of fractional quan- tum Hall states, Science 324, 1044 (2009), http://www.sciencemag.org/content/324/5930/1044.full.pdf

    2009

  22. [30]

    Liang, Z

    J. Liang, Z. Liu, Z. Yang, Y. Huang, U. Wurstbauer, C. R. Dean, K. W. West, L. N. Pfeiffer, L. Du, and A. Pinczuk, Evidence for chiral graviton modes in frac- tional quantum Hall liquids, Nature 10.1038/s41586- 024-07201-w (2024)

    2024 doi

  23. [31]

    A. C. Balram, G. J. Sreejith, and J. K. Jain, Splitting of the Girvin-MacDonald-Platzman density wave and the nature of chiral gravitons in the fractional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 133, 246605 (2024)

    2024

  24. [32]

    Moore and N

    G. Moore and N. Read, Nonabelions in the fractional quantum Hall effect, Nucl. Phys. B 360, 362 (1991)

    1991

  25. [33]

    Willett, J

    R. Willett, J. P. Eisenstein, H. L. St¨ ormer, D. C. Tsui, A. C. Gossard, and J. H. English, Observation of an even-denominator quantum number in the fractional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 59, 1776 (1987)

    1987

  26. [34]

    Greiter, X.-G

    M. Greiter, X.-G. Wen, and F. Wilczek, Paired Hall state at half filling, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 3205 (1991)

    1991

  27. [35]

    Read and D

    N. Read and D. Green, Paired states of fermions in two dimensions with breaking of parity and time-reversal symmetries and the fractional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 61, 10267 (2000)

    2000

  28. [36]

    J. K. Jain, Composite-fermion approach for the frac- tional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 63, 199 (1989)

    1989

  29. [37]

    J. K. Jain, Composite Fermions (Cambridge University Press, New York, US, 2007)

    2007

  30. [38]

    Bonderson, V

    P. Bonderson, V. Gurarie, and C. Nayak, Plasma anal- ogy and non-Abelian statistics for ising-type quantum Hall states, Phys. Rev. B 83, 075303 (2011)

    2011

  31. [39]

    M¨ oller, A

    G. M¨ oller, A. W´ ojs, and N. R. Cooper, Neutral fermion excitations in the Moore-Read state at filling factor ν = 5/2, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 036803 (2011)

    2011

  32. [40]

    G. J. Sreejith, A. W´ ojs, and J. K. Jain, Unpaired composite fermion, topological exciton, and zero mode, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 136802 (2011)

    2011

  33. [41]

    G. J. Sreejith, C. T˝ oke, A. W´ ojs, and J. K. Jain, Bi- partite composite fermion states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 107, 086806 (2011)

    2011

  34. [42]

    Yang, Z.-X

    B. Yang, Z.-X. Hu, Z. Papi´ c, and F. D. M. Haldane, Model wave functions for the collective modes and the magnetoroton theory of the fractional quantum Hall ef- fect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 256807 (2012)

    2012

  35. [43]

    Gromov, E

    A. Gromov, E. J. Martinec, and S. Ryu, Collective exci- tations at filling factor 5 /2: The view from superspace, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 077601 (2020)

    2020

  36. [44]

    S. Pu, A. C. Balram, M. Fremling, A. Gromov, and Z. Papi´ c, Signatures of supersymmetry in the ν = 5/2 fractional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 176501 (2023)

    2023

  37. [45]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Fractional quantization of the Hall effect: A hierarchy of incompressible quantum fluid states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 605 (1983)

    1983

  38. [46]

    A. C. Balram, M. Barkeshli, and M. S. Rudner, Par- ton construction of a wave function in the anti-Pfaffian phase, Phys. Rev. B 98, 035127 (2018)

    2018

  39. [47]

    S.-S. Lee, S. Ryu, C. Nayak, and M. P. A. Fisher, Particle-hole symmetry and the ν = 5/2 quantum Hall state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 236807 (2007)

    2007

  40. [48]

    Levin, B

    M. Levin, B. I. Halperin, and B. Rosenow, Particle-hole symmetry and the Pfaffian state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 236806 (2007)

    2007

  41. [49]

    A. C. Balram, Transitions from Abelian composite fermion to non-Abelian parton fractional quantum Hall states in the zeroth Landau level of bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 105, L121406 (2022)

    2022

  42. [50]

    J. K. Jain, Incompressible quantum Hall states, Phys. Rev. B 40, 8079 (1989)

    1989

  43. [51]

    D. X. Nguyen and D. T. Son, Dirac composite fermion theory of general Jain sequences, Phys. Rev. Research 3, 033217 (2021)

    2021

  44. [52]

    A. C. Balram, Z. Liu, A. Gromov, and Z. Papi´ c, Very- high-energy collective states of partons in fractional quantum Hall liquids, Phys. Rev. X 12, 021008 (2022)

    2022

  45. [53]

    D. X. Nguyen, F. D. M. Haldane, E. H. Rezayi, D. T. Son, and K. Yang, Multiple magnetorotons and spec- tral sum rules in fractional quantum Hall systems, Phys. Rev. Lett. 128, 246402 (2022)

    2022

  46. [54]

    Yuzhu and Y

    W. Yuzhu and Y. Bo, Geometric fluctuation of confor- mal Hilbert spaces and multiple graviton modes in frac- tional quantum Hall effect, Nature Communications 14, 2317 (2023)

    2023

  47. [55]

    Y. Wu, T. Shi, and J. K. Jain, Non-abelian parton fractional quantum Hall effect in multilayer graphene, Nano Letters 17, 4643 (2017), pMID: 28649831, http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01080

    2017 doi

  48. [56]

    A. C. Balram, M. Barkeshli, and M. S. Rudner, Par- ton construction of particle-hole-conjugate Read-Rezayi parafermion fractional quantum Hall states and beyond, Phys. Rev. B 99, 241108 (2019)

    2019

  49. [57]

    A. C. Balram, A non-abelian parton state for the ν = 2 + 3/8 fractional quantum Hall effect, SciPost Phys. 10, 83 (2021)

    2021

  50. [58]

    W. N. Faugno, J. K. Jain, and A. C. Balram, Non- abelian fractional quantum Hall state at 3 /7-filled Lan- dau level, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 033223 (2020)

    2020

  51. [59]

    J. K. Jain, Thirty Years of Composite Fermions and Beyond, in Fractional Quantum Hall Effects (World Scientific, Singapore, 2020) Chap. 1, pp. 1–78, https://www.worldscientific.com/doi/pdf/10.1142/9789811217494 0001

    2020 doi

  52. [60]

    Papi´ c and A

    Z. Papi´ c and A. C. Balram, Fractional quantum Hall effect in semiconductor systems, in Encyclopedia of Condensed Matter Physics (Second Edition) , edited by T. Chakraborty (Academic Press, Oxford, 2024) second edition ed., pp. 285–307

    2024

  53. [61]

    Bose and A

    K. Bose and A. C. Balram, Prediction of non-Abelian 17 fractional quantum Hall effect at ν = 2 + 4 11 , Phys. Rev. B 107, 235111 (2023)

    2023

  54. [62]

    A. C. Balram and N. Regnault, Fractional quantum Hall effect of partons and the nature of the 8/17 state in the zeroth Landau level of bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. B 110, L081114 (2024)

    2024

  55. [63]

    Senthil, A

    T. Senthil, A. Vishwanath, L. Balents, S. Sachdev, and M. P. A. Fisher, Deconfined quantum critical points, Science 303, 1490 (2004), https://www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.1091806

    2004 doi

  56. [64]

    W. N. Faugno, A. C. Balram, M. Barkeshli, and J. K. Jain, Prediction of a non-Abelian fractional quantum Hall state with f -wave pairing of composite fermions in wide quantum wells, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 016802 (2019)

    2019

  57. [65]

    Sharma, S

    A. Sharma, S. Pu, A. C. Balram, and J. K. Jain, Frac- tional quantum hall effect with unconventional pairing in monolayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 126201 (2023)

    2023

  58. [66]

    Read and E

    N. Read and E. Rezayi, Beyond paired quantum Hall states: Parafermions and incompressible states in the first excited Landau level, Phys. Rev. B59, 8084 (1999)

    1999

  59. [67]

    R. H. Morf, Transition from quantum Hall to compress- ible states in the second Landau level: New light on the ν = 5/2 enigma, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 1505 (1998)

    1998

  60. [68]

    R. H. Morf, N. d’Ambrumenil, and S. Das Sarma, Exci- tation gaps in fractional quantum Hall states: An exact diagonalization study, Phys. Rev. B 66, 075408 (2002)

    2002

  61. [69]

    Ku´ smierz and A

    B. Ku´ smierz and A. W´ ojs, Emergence of jack ground states from two-body pseudopotentials in fractional quantum Hall systems, Phys. Rev. B 97, 245125 (2018)

    2018

  62. [70]

    A. C. Balram and A. W´ ojs, Fractional quantum Hall effect at ν = 2 + 4 /9, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 032035 (2020)

    2020

  63. [71]

    Majorana Physics, Neu- tral Femion Modes, and a “Gravitino

    F. D. M. Haldane’s talk titled “Majorana Physics, Neu- tral Femion Modes, and a “Gravitino”, in the Moore- Read Fractional Quantum Hall State” delivered at the workshop on “Majorana Physics in Condensed Mat- ter” held at the Ettiore Majorana Center, Erice, Sicily on July 13, 2...

    2013

  64. [72]

    I. D. Rodriguez, A. Sterdyniak, M. Hermanns, J. K. Slingerland, and N. Regnault, Quasiparticles and exci- tons for the Pfaffian quantum Hall state, Phys. Rev. B 85, 035128 (2012)

    2012

  65. [73]

    J. K. Jain and R. K. Kamilla, Composite fermions in the Hilbert space of the lowest electronic Landau level, Int. J. Mod. Phys. B 11, 2621 (1997)

    1997

  66. [74]

    J. K. Jain and R. K. Kamilla, Quantitative study of large composite-fermion systems, Phys. Rev. B 55, R4895 (1997)

    1997

  67. [75]

    M¨ oller and S

    G. M¨ oller and S. H. Simon, Composite fermions in a negative effective magnetic field: A Monte Carlo study, Phys. Rev. B 72, 045344 (2005)

    2005

  68. [76]

    S. C. Davenport and S. H. Simon, Spinful composite fermions in a negative effective field, Phys. Rev. B 85, 245303 (2012)

    2012

  69. [77]

    A. C. Balram, C. T¨ oke, A. W´ ojs, and J. K. Jain, Frac- tional quantum Hall effect in graphene: Quantitative comparison between theory and experiment, Phys. Rev. B 92, 075410 (2015)

    2015

  70. [78]

    Gattu and J

    M. Gattu and J. K. Jain, Unlocking new regimes in fractional quantum Hall effect with quaternions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 156501 (2025)

    2025

  71. [79]

    X. G. Wen and A. Zee, Shift and spin vector: New topo- logical quantum numbers for the Hall fluids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 953 (1992)

    1992

  72. [80]

    A. C. Balram and J. K. Jain, Nature of composite fermions and the role of particle-hole symmetry: A mi- croscopic account, Phys. Rev. B 93, 235152 (2016)

    2016

  73. [81]

    Anand, R

    A. Anand, R. A. Patil, A. C. Balram, and G. J. Sree- jith, Real-space entanglement spectra of parton states in fractional quantum Hall systems, Phys. Rev. B 106, 085136 (2022)

    2022

  74. [82]

    Dev and J

    G. Dev and J. K. Jain, Band structure of the fractional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 69, 2843 (1992)

    1992

  75. [83]

    A. C. Balram, A. W´ ojs, and J. K. Jain, State counting for excited bands of the fractional quantum Hall effect: Exclusion rules for bound excitons, Phys. Rev. B 88, 205312 (2013)

    2013

  76. [84]

    D. X. Nguyen and D. T. Son, Spin of fractional quantum hall neutral modes and” missing states” on a sphere, arXiv preprint arXiv:2503.06914 (2025)

    2025

  77. [85]

    A. C. Balram and S. Pu, Positions of the magnetoro- ton minima in the fractional quantum Hall effect, The European Physical Journal B 90, 124 (2017)

    2017

  78. [86]

    R. K. Kamilla, X. G. Wu, and J. K. Jain, Excitons of composite fermions, Phys. Rev. B 54, 4873 (1996)

    1996

  79. [87]

    R. K. Kamilla, X. G. Wu, and J. K. Jain, Compos- ite fermion theory of collective excitations in fractional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Lett. 76, 1332 (1996)

    1996

  80. [88]

    V. W. Scarola, K. Park, and J. K. Jain, Rotons of com- posite fermions: Comparison between theory and exper- iment, Phys. Rev. B 61, 13064 (2000)

    2000

  81. [89]

    R. K. Dora and A. C. Balram, Static structure factor and the dispersion of the Girvin-MacDonald-Platzman density mode for fractional quantum Hall fluids on the Haldane sphere, Phys. Rev. B 111, 115132 (2025)

    2025

  82. [90]

    C. Shi, S. Jolad, N. Regnault, and J. K. Jain, Phase diagram for bilayer quantum Hall effect at total filling νt = 5, Phys. Rev. B 77, 155127 (2008)

    2008

  83. [91]

    Binder and D

    K. Binder and D. Heermann, Monte Carlo Simulation in Statistical Physics (Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, 2010)

    2010

  84. [92]

    A. C. Balram, J. K. Jain, and M. Barkeshli, 𭟋n super- conductivity of composite bosons and the 7/3 fractional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. Research 2, 013349 (2020)

    2020

  85. [93]

    A. C. Balram, C. T˝ oke, A. W´ ojs, and J. K. Jain, Spon- taneous polarization of composite fermions in the n = 1 Landau level of graphene, Phys. Rev. B 92, 205120 (2015)

    2015

  86. [94]

    A. C. Balram, C. T˝ oke, and J. K. Jain, Luttinger theo- rem for the strongly correlated Fermi liquid of composite fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 186805 (2015)

    2015

  87. [95]

    B. I. Halperin, Theory of the quantized Hall conduc- tance, Helvetica Physica Acta 56, 75 (1983)

    1983

  88. [96]

    Bishara, G

    W. Bishara, G. A. Fiete, and C. Nayak, Quantum Hall states at ν = 2 k+2 : Analysis of the particle-hole conju- gates of the general level- k Read-Rezayi states, Phys. Rev. B 77, 241306 (2008)

    2008

  89. [97]

    Li and F

    H. Li and F. D. M. Haldane, Entanglement spectrum as a generalization of entanglement entropy: Identification of topological order in non-abelian fractional quantum Hall effect states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 010504 (2008)

    2008

  90. [98]

    Yutushui, M

    M. Yutushui, M. Hermanns, and D. F. Mross, Non- Abelian phases from the condensation of Abelian anyons (2025), arXiv:2502.12245 [cond-mat.str-el]. 18

    2025 arXiv

  91. [99]

    R. V. Mishmash, D. F. Mross, J. Alicea, and O. I. Motrunich, Numerical exploration of trial wave func- tions for the particle-hole-symmetric Pfaffian, Phys. Rev. B 98, 081107 (2018)

    2018

  92. [100]

    Yutushui and D

    M. Yutushui and D. F. Mross, Large-scale simulations of particle-hole-symmetric Pfaffian trial wave functions, Phys. Rev. B 102, 195153 (2020)

    2020

  93. [101]

    E. H. Rezayi, K. Pakrouski, and F. D. M. Haldane, Stability of the particle-hole pfaffian state and the 5 2 -fractional quantum hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 104, L081407 (2021)

    2021

  94. [102]

    Bonderson and J

    P. Bonderson and J. K. Slingerland, Fractional quantum Hall hierarchy and the second Landau level, Phys. Rev. B 78, 125323 (2008)

    2008

  95. [103]

    X. G. Wen, Non-abelian statistics in the fractional quan- tum Hall states, Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 802 (1991)

    1991

  96. [104]

    S. H. Simon, E. H. Rezayi, and N. R. Cooper, General- ized quantum Hall projection Hamiltonians, Phys. Rev. B 75, 075318 (2007)

    2007

  97. [105]

    S.-F. Liou, F. D. M. Haldane, K. Yang, and E. H. Rezayi, Chiral gravitons in fractional quantum Hall liq- uids, Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 146801 (2019)

    2019

  98. [106]

    S. A. Trugman and S. Kivelson, Exact results for the fractional quantum Hall effect with general interactions, Phys. Rev. B 31, 5280 (1985)

    1985

  99. [107]

    D. R. Luhman, W. Pan, D. C. Tsui, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. Baldwin, and K. W. West, Observation of a fractional quantum Hall state at ν = 1/4 in a wide GaAs quantum well, Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, 266804 (2008)

    2008

  100. [108]

    Shabani, T

    J. Shabani, T. Gokmen, and M. Shayegan, Correlated states of electrons in wide quantum wells at low fillings: The role of charge distribution symmetry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 046805 (2009)

    2009

  101. [109]

    Shabani, T

    J. Shabani, T. Gokmen, Y. T. Chiu, and M. Shayegan, Evidence for developing fractional quantum Hall states at even denominator 1 /2 and 1 /4 fillings in asymmet- ric wide quantum wells, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 256802 (2009)

    2009

  102. [110]

    Shabani, Y

    J. Shabani, Y. Liu, M. Shayegan, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. West, and K. W. Baldwin, Phase diagrams for the sta- bility of the ν = 1 2 fractional quantum Hall effect in elec- tron systems confined to symmetric, wide GaAs quan- tum wells, Phys. Rev. B 88, 245413 (2013)

    2013

  103. [111]

    Sharma, A

    A. Sharma, A. C. Balram, and J. K. Jain, Composite- fermion pairing at half-filled and quarter-filled lowest Landau level, Phys. Rev. B 109, 035306 (2024)

    2024

  104. [112]

    Y. Kim, A. C. Balram, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, J. K. Jain, and J. H. Smet, Even denominator frac- tional quantum Hall states in higher Landau levels of graphene, Nature Physics 15, 154 (2019)

    2019

  105. [113]

    Z.-W. Zuo, A. C. Balram, S. Pu, J. Zhao, T. Jolicoeur, A. W´ ojs, and J. K. Jain, Interplay between fractional quantum Hall liquid and crystal phases at low filling, Phys. Rev. B 102, 075307 (2020)

    2020

  106. [114]

    C. Wang, P. T. Madathil, S. K. Singh, A. Gupta, Y. J. Chung, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. Baldwin, and M. Shayegan, Developing fractional quantum Hall states at even- denominator fillings 1/6 and 1/8, Phys. Rev. Lett. 134, 046502 (2025)

    2025

  107. [115]

    A. C. Balram, A. Sharma, and J. K. Jain, Interplay of superconducting, metallic, and crystalline states of composite fermions at ν = 1 6 in wide quantum wells, Phys. Rev. B 112, 035118 (2025)

    2025

  108. [116]

    J. S. Xia, W. Pan, C. L. Vicente, E. D. Adams, N. S. Sullivan, H. L. Stormer, D. C. Tsui, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. Baldwin, and K. W. West, Electron correlation in the second Landau level: A competition between many nearly degenerate quantum phases, Phys. Rev. Lett.93, 176809 (2004)

    2004

  109. [117]

    W. Pan, J. S. Xia, H. L. Stormer, D. C. Tsui, C. Vi- cente, E. D. Adams, N. S. Sullivan, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. Baldwin, and K. W. West, Experimental studies of the fractional quantum Hall effect in the first excited Lan- dau level, Phys. Rev. B 77, 075307 (2008)

    2008

  110. [118]

    H. C. Choi, W. Kang, S. Das Sarma, L. N. Pfeiffer, and K. W. West, Activation gaps of fractional quantum Hall effect in the second Landau level, Phys. Rev. B 77, 081301 (2008)

    2008

  111. [119]

    Kumar, G

    A. Kumar, G. A. Cs´ athy, M. J. Manfra, L. N. Pfeif- fer, and K. W. West, Nonconventional odd-denominator fractional quantum Hall states in the second Landau level, Phys. Rev. Lett. 105, 246808 (2010)

    2010

  112. [120]

    Zhang, C

    C. Zhang, C. Huan, J. S. Xia, N. S. Sullivan, W. Pan, K. W. Baldwin, K. W. West, L. N. Pfeiffer, and D. C. Tsui, Spin polarization of the ν = 12/5 fractional quan- tum Hall state, Phys. Rev. B 85, 241302 (2012)

    2012

  113. [121]

    Huang, H

    K. Huang, H. Fu, D. R. Hickey, N. Alem, X. Lin, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, and J. Zhu, Valley isospin controlled fractional quantum Hall states in bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. X 12, 031019 (2022)

    2022

  114. [122]

    Bonderson, A

    P. Bonderson, A. E. Feiguin, G. M¨ oller, and J. K. Slingerland, Competing topological orders in the ν = 12/5 quantum Hall state, Phys. Rev. Lett. 108, 036806 (2012)

    2012

  115. [123]

    W. Zhu, S. S. Gong, F. D. M. Haldane, and D. N. Sheng, Fractional quantum Hall states at ν = 13 /5 and 12 /5 and their non-abelian nature, Phys. Rev. Lett. 115, 126805 (2015)

    2015

  116. [124]

    R. S. K. Mong, M. P. Zaletel, F. Pollmann, and Z. Papi´ c, Fibonacci anyons and charge density order in the 12/5 and 13/5 quantum Hall plateaus, Phys. Rev. B 95, 115136 (2017)

    2017

  117. [125]

    Pakrouski, M

    K. Pakrouski, M. Troyer, Y.-L. Wu, S. Das Sarma, and M. R. Peterson, Enigmatic 12/5 fractional quan- tum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 94, 075108 (2016)

    2016

  118. [126]

    Samkharadze, I

    N. Samkharadze, I. Arnold, L. N. Pfeiffer, K. W. West, and G. A. Cs´ athy, Observation of incompressibility at ν = 4/11 and ν = 5/13, Phys. Rev. B91, 081109 (2015)

    2015

  119. [127]

    W. Pan, K. W. Baldwin, K. W. West, L. N. Pfeiffer, and D. C. Tsui, Fractional quantum Hall effect at Landau level filling ν = 4/11, Phys. Rev. B 91, 041301 (2015)

    2015

  120. [128]

    A. C. Balram, Abelian parton state for the ν = 4 /11 fractional quantum Hall effect, Phys. Rev. B 103, 155103 (2021)

    2021

  121. [129]

    Mukherjee and S

    S. Mukherjee and S. S. Mandal, Anomalously low magnetoroton energies of the unconventional fractional quantum Hall states of composite fermions, Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 156802 (2015)

    2015

  122. [130]

    A. C. Balram and A. W´ ojs, Parton wave function for the fractional quantum hall effect at ν = 6 /17, Phys. Rev. Research 3, 033087 (2021)

    2021

  123. [131]

    R. K. Dora and A. C. Balram, Nature of the anomalous 4/13 fractional quantum Hall effect in graphene, Phys. Rev. B 105, L241403 (2022)

    2022

  124. [132]

    Kumar, S

    P. Kumar, S. Raghu, and M. Mulligan, Composite fermion Hall conductivity and the half-filled Landau level, Phys. Rev. B 99, 235114 (2019)

    2019

  125. [133]

    W. N. Faugno, T. Zhao, A. C. Balram, T. Jolicoeur, and 19 J. K. Jain, Unconventional 𭟋n parton states at ν = 7/3: Role of finite width, Phys. Rev. B 103, 085303 (2021)

    2021

  126. [134]

    A. C. Balram, S. Mukherjee, K. Park, M. Barkeshli, M. S. Rudner, and J. K. Jain, Fractional quantum Hall effect at ν = 2 + 6/13: The parton paradigm for the sec- ond Landau level, Phys. Rev. Lett. 121, 186601 (2018)

    2018

  127. [135]

    F. D. M. Haldane, Two-dimensional inversion symme- try as the fundamental symmetry of incompressible quantum Hall fluids (2023), arXiv:2302.10968 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

    2023 arXiv

  128. [136]

    Rezayi and N

    E. Rezayi and N. Read, Fermi-liquid-like state in a half- filled Landau level, Phys. Rev. Lett. 72, 900 (1994)

    1994

  129. [137]

    Z. Liu, A. C. Balram, Z. Papi´ c, and A. Gromov, Quench dynamics of collective modes in fractional quantum Hall bilayers, Phys. Rev. Lett. 126, 076604 (2021)

    2021

  130. [138]

    Z. Liu, A. Gromov, and Z. Papi´ c, Geometric quench and nonequilibrium dynamics of fractional quantum Hall states, Phys. Rev. B 98, 155140 (2018)

    2018

  131. [139]

    X. Liu, G. Farahi, C.-L. Chiu, Z. Papic, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. P. Zaletel, and A. Yazdani, Visualizing broken symmetry and topological defects in a quantum Hall ferromagnet, Science 375, 321 (2022)

    2022

  132. [140]

    Coissard, D

    A. Coissard, D. Wander, H. Vignaud, A. G. Grushin, C. Repellin, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, F. Gay, C. B. Winkelmann, H. Courtois, H. Sellier, and B. Sac´ ep´ e, Imaging tunable quantum Hall broken-symmetry orders in graphene, Nature 605, 51 (2022)

    2022

  133. [141]

    Farahi, C.-L

    G. Farahi, C.-L. Chiu, X. Liu, Z. Papic, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, M. P. Zaletel, and A. Yazdani, Broken symmetries and excitation spectra of interacting elec- trons in partially filled Landau levels, Nature Physics 10.1038/s41567-023-02126-z (2023)

    2023 doi

  134. [142]

    Hu, Y.-C

    Y. Hu, Y.-C. Tsui, M. He, U. Kamber, T. Wang, A. S. Mohammadi, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, Z. Papic, M. P. Zaletel, and A. Yazdani, High-resolution tunneling spectroscopy of fractional quantum Hall states (2023), arXiv:2308.05789 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

    2023

  135. [143]

    S. Pu, A. C. Balram, and Z. Papi´ c, Local density of states and particle entanglement in topological quantum fluids, Phys. Rev. B 106, 045140 (2022)

    2022

  136. [144]

    S. Pu, A. C. Balram, Y. Hu, Y.-C. Tsui, M. He, N. Reg- nault, M. P. Zaletel, A. Yazdani, and Z. Papi´ c, Finger- prints of composite fermion Lambda levels in scanning tunneling microscopy (2023), arXiv:2312.06779 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

    2023 arXiv

  137. [145]

    Gattu, G

    M. Gattu, G. J. Sreejith, and J. K. Jain, STM in the fractional quantum Hall effect: Spec- troscopy of composite-fermion bound states (2023), arXiv:2312.07114 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2023 arXiv

  138. [146]

    Pichler, W

    F. Pichler, W. Kadow, C. Kuhlenkamp, and M. Knap, Single-particle spectral function of fractional quantum anomalous Hall states, Phys. Rev. B 111, 075108 (2025)

    2025

  139. [147]

    T. Zhao, A. C. Balram, and J. K. Jain, Composite fermion pairing induced by Landau level mixing, Phys. Rev. Lett. 130, 186302 (2023)

    2023

  140. [148]

    Y. W. Suen, L. W. Engel, M. B. Santos, M. Shayegan, and D. C. Tsui, Observation of a ν = 1 /2 fractional quantum Hall state in a double-layer electron system, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 1379 (1992)

    1992

  141. [149]

    Drichko, I

    I. Drichko, I. Y. Smirnov, A. Suslov, D. Kamburov, K. Baldwin, L. Pfeiffer, K. West, and Y. Galperin, Com- posite fermions in a wide quantum well in the vicinity of the filling factor 1/2, Solid State Communications 301, 113698 (2019)

    2019

  142. [150]

    T. Zhao, W. N. Faugno, S. Pu, A. C. Balram, and J. K. Jain, Origin of the ν = 1 /2 fractional quantum Hall effect in wide quantum wells, Phys. Rev. B 103, 155306 (2021)

    2021

  143. [151]

    S. K. Singh, C. Wang, C. T. Tai, C. S. Calhoun, K. A. Villegas Rosales, P. T. Madathil, A. Gupta, K. W. Bald- win, L. N. Pfeiffer, and M. Shayegan, Topological phase transition between Jain states and daughter states of the ν = 1/2 fractional quantum Hall state, Nature Physics...

    2024 doi

  144. [152]

    A. A. Zibrov, C. R. Kometter, H. Zhou, E. M. Spanton, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, M. P. Zaletel, and A. F. Young, Tunable interacting composite fermion phases in a half-filled bilayer-graphene Landau level, Nature 549, 360 (2017)

    2017

  145. [153]

    Assouline, T

    A. Assouline, T. Wang, H. Zhou, L. A. Cohen, F. Yang, R. Zhang, T. Taniguchi, K. Watanabe, R. S. K. Mong, M. P. Zaletel, and A. F. Young, Energy gap of the even- denominator fractional quantum Hall state in bilayer graphene, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 046603 (2024)

    2024

  146. [154]

    Kumar, A

    R. Kumar, A. Haug, J. Kim, M. Yutushui, K. Khudi- akov, V. Bhardwaj, A. Ilin, K. Watanabe, T. Taniguchi, D. F. Mross, and Y. Ronen, Quarter- and half-filled quantum Hall states and their competing interactions in bilayer graphene (2024), arXiv:2405.19405 [cond- mat.mes-hall]

    2024 arXiv

  147. [155]

    N. R. Cooper, N. K. Wilkin, and J. M. F. Gunn, Quan- tum phases of vortices in rotating bose-einstein conden- sates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 120405 (2001)

    2001

  148. [156]

    Regnault and T

    N. Regnault and T. Jolicoeur, Quantum Hall fractions in rotating bose-einstein condensates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 030402 (2003)

    2003

  149. [157]

    Regnault and T

    N. Regnault and T. Jolicoeur, Quantum Hall fractions for spinless bosons, Phys. Rev. B 69, 235309 (2004)

    2004

  150. [158]

    Voinea, S

    C. Voinea, S. Pu, A. Kirmani, P. Ghaemi, A. Rah- mani, and Z. Papi´ c, Deformed Fredkin model for the ν=5/2 Moore-Read state on thin cylinders (2023), arXiv:2309.04527 [cond-mat.str-el]

    2023 arXiv

  151. [159]

    Fradkin and S

    E. Fradkin and S. A. Kivelson, Liquid-crystal phases of quantum Hall systems, Phys. Rev. B 59, 8065 (1999)

    1999

  152. [160]

    Y. You, G. Y. Cho, and E. Fradkin, Theory of nematic fractional quantum Hall states, Phys. Rev. X 4, 041050 (2014)

    2014

  153. [161]

    Maciejko, B

    J. Maciejko, B. Hsu, S. A. Kivelson, Y. Park, and S. L. Sondhi, Field theory of the quantum Hall nematic tran- sition, Phys. Rev. B 88, 125137 (2013)

    2013

  154. [162]

    S. Pu, A. C. Balram, J. Taylor, E. Fradkin, and Z. Papi´ c, Microscopic model for fractional quantum Hall nemat- ics, Phys. Rev. Lett. 132, 236503 (2024)

    2024

  155. [163]

    D. X. Nguyen, K. Prabhu, A. C. Balram, and A. Gro- mov, Supergravity model of the Haldane-Rezayi frac- tional quantum Hall state, Phys. Rev. B 107, 125119 (2023)

    2023

  156. [164]

    DiagHam, https://www.nick-ux.org/diagham

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.