On spider diffusions having a spinning measure selected from their own local time

Isaac Ohavi; Miguel Martinez

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

On spider diffusions having a spinning measure selected from their own local time

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proves Itô's formula for a Walsh spider diffusion whose spinning measure is a function of its own local time at the junction.

desk verdict A plausible and genuinely new companion paper on spider diffusions with local-time-dependent spinning; the central Itô formula proof has a repairable but real gap in the initial excursion term. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.02754 v1 pith:CWOTRL4W submitted 2025-02-04 math.PR

Isaac Ohavi , Miguel Martinez This is my paper · ORCID

classification math.PR MSC 60J6060J5560H05

keywords WalshspiderdiffusionlocaltimespinningmeasureItôformulastrongMarkovpropertyFeynman-Kacrepresentationstar-shapednetworknon-stickiness

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes Itô's formula for the Walsh spider diffusion constructed in the companion paper, where the probabilities of choosing a ray at the junction are not fixed but depend on the process's own local time at the junction. The main result, Theorem 3.1, writes a smooth test function of the process and its local time as a stochastic integral against the same Brownian motion that drives the radial coordinate, plus drift terms and boundary local-time terms. From this formula the authors derive a density for the marginal law with no atom at the junction, two L1 approximations of the local time, the strong Markov property, and a characterization of the instantaneous scattering distribution along each ray. The paper also gives a Feynman-Kac representation for linear parabolic systems with a local-time Kirchhoff boundary condition. If the results are correct, the process of the companion paper is not merely a solution of a martingale problem but a full-fledged Markov diffusion with a complete calculus.

What carries the argument

The paper's central object is the martingale problem (Spi-Mar) for the spider process (x,i,l) on the star-shaped network J, where the spinning coefficients α_i(t,l) and the diffusion coefficients depend on the local time l at the vertex. The load-bearing mechanism is the excursion decomposition of the radial coordinate x around the vertex, using the hitting times θε_n of the level ε and τε_n of the vertex 0, together with the companion paper's non-stickiness bound E∫_0^T 1_{x(u)≤ε}du ≤ Cε. That bound makes the accumulated quadratic variation of excursion endpoints vanish as ε→0, so that the Itô formula's boundary term comes only from local time and the α-weighted spatial derivatives at 0; the same ε-removal turns occupation-time formulas into the two L1 approximations of the local time.

What would settle it

Simulate the companion-paper construction on two rays with α_1(l)=1/(1+l), α_2(l)=l/(1+l), record the branch chosen at first exit from a radius δ around the vertex, and compare the empirical frequency to α_1(t,ℓ) at the local-time level of that exit; Proposition 8.1 predicts agreement as δ→0. Alternatively, evaluate both sides of the Itô formula (7) for a smooth test function in the simulation and check that any systematic discrepancy vanishes as the excursion cutoff ε→0.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

For every bounded test function f in $C^{{1,2,1}}$_b(J_T × R_+), the Itô formula (7) holds almost surely, writing f_{i(t)}(t,x(t),l(t)) - f_{i*}(0,x_*,0) as the sum of a stochastic integral against the Brownian motion W appearing in the martingale problem, the usual time and spatial drift terms, and the boundary contribution ∂_l f(u,0,l(u)) dl(u) plus the weighted sum of spatial derivatives at the vertex. The proof decomposes the path into excursions away from the vertex, computes the quadratic variation piecewise on each excursion, and then sends the excursion radius ε to zero using the non-stickiness estimate of the companion paper. A subsequent exponential-martingale argument identifies the stochastic integral, and the formula is extended from product-form test functions to the full class. A central corollary is that for each fixed t>0 the law of x(t) is absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue measure and has no atom at the vertex.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is the companion paper's non-stickiness estimate E∫_0^T 1_{x(u)≤ε}du ≤ Cε, which lets every ε-limit in this paper be sent to zero; without it, excursions near the junction need not be negligible and the Itô formula, density, approximations, and scattering limit would not follow.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

Every test function in C^{1,2,1}_b admits the same Itô representation, so the process of the companion paper can be used in stochastic calculus arguments that need both a driving Brownian motion and a local-time boundary term.
For each fixed t>0 the law of x(t) is absolutely continuous with respect to Lebesgue measure, so the process has no atom at the junction at a fixed time.
The local time at the vertex is approximated in L1 both by ε times the number of downcrossings from ε to 0 and by the normalized occupation time near 0, extending the classical one-dimensional formulas to the local-time-dependent spider.
Solutions of the backward linear parabolic system with local-time Kirchhoff boundary condition admit the explicit probabilistic representation given in Theorem 5.2.
Upon reaching the vertex with local time ℓ at time t, the probability of scattering to ray i tends to α_i(t,ℓ) as the observation radius shrinks to zero.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

Editorial inference: the Itô formula together with the strong Markov property suggests that the joint process (x,i,l) is a genuine Markov process on the augmented state space J × R_+, although the paper does not exhibit its infinitesimal generator on the whole space.
Editorial inference: one could test the scattering law empirically by counting first-exit rays from a small ball in a simulation of the companion-paper construction; the limiting frequencies should equal α_i evaluated at the current local-time level, and any systematic disagreement would localize a failure of the non-stickiness estimate.
Editorial inference: the Feynman-Kac representation is proved for linear parabolic systems; the same probabilistic representation should transfer to nonlinear Hamilton-Jacobi-Bellman settings with local-time Kirchhoff boundary transmission, using the comparison principle already available for such systems, although this paper does not make that step.
Editorial inference: the absolute-continuity proof only addresses the marginal law of the radial coordinate x(t); a parallel argument using the squared process suggests the pair (x(t),l(t)) may also have a density away from the vertex, but that is not claimed here.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

The paper is the natural follow-up to the authors' construction of Walsh spider diffusions with a spinning measure that depends on the process's own local time. The results are new: constant spinning measure cases were known (Freidlin–Sheu, Barlow–Pitman–Yor), but the local-time-dependent case is not covered by those. The paper gives an Itô formula, absolute continuity of the one-dimensional marginals, a Feynman–Kac representation, local-time approximations, the strong Markov property, and a scattering limit. That is a coherent and useful package for this class of processes, and the paper is honest about what is imported from the companion paper [17] and the PDE paper [18]. The scattering proof and the downcrossing representation are clean and the non-stickiness estimate is correctly identified as the load-bearing imported input.

The stress-test note is right and lands on the central proof. In Theorem 3.1, Step 1, the excursion decomposition sets τ^ε_0 = 0 and θ^ε_0 as the first hitting time of ε. If the starting point x* > ε, the n = 0 segment [0, θ^ε_0) stays above ε, so the bound (14) — the whole sum of M^{1,n,ε} controlled by C∫_0^t 1_{x(u)≤ε} du — is simply false for that term. The initial segment contributes a nonzero quadratic variation that does not vanish as ε→0. The proof as written therefore does not establish the Itô formula for starting points away from zero. This is a local gap and it looks repairable, for example by applying the excursion argument only after the first hitting time of 0, or by treating the first excursion separately. But it is a genuine flaw in the paper's main theorem, not a cosmetic issue.

Two smaller soft spots. The strong Markov section restarts the process at "time t" after a stopping time τ; it should restart at τ, and the time-inhomogeneous mechanism is left ambiguous enough that the proof of Lemma 7.1 does not quite convince. The application of Fournier–Printems in Section 4.2 is asserted rather than verified: the drift contains the chaotic index i(u), and the paper says the good integrability properties suffice without checking the exact hypotheses. The reader's note that there is an order-ε versus ε² error in the absolute continuity estimate did not survive reading — the displayed computation gives Cε² — but the unverified application of [9] remains a legitimate concern. The Feynman–Kac section leans on the authors' own PDE well-posedness result from [18]; that is acceptable since [18] is published, but the representation is conditional on that regularity framework.

Who is this for? Specialists in Walsh diffusions, Markov processes on graphs, and stochastic control with boundary conditions. The paper deserves a serious referee: the objects are new, the theorems are plausible, and the gaps are identifiable and likely repairable. I would recommend engaging with it, but the referee should insist on a repaired Itô formula proof and a clarified strong Markov statement before acceptance.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper studies the Walsh spider diffusion constructed in the companion paper [17], whose spinning measure depends on time and on the local time at the junction vertex. The main results are: an Itô formula driven by the same Brownian motion as the underlying diffusion (Theorem 3.1); non-atomicity of the law of x(t) at zero and existence of a density (Section 4); a Feynman-Kac representation for linear parabolic systems with a local-time Kirchhoff boundary condition (Theorem 5.2); two local-time approximations, a downcrossing representation and a mean-value approximation (Section 6); the strong Markov property (Section 7); and a characterization of the instantaneous scattering distribution at the vertex as the spinning coefficients α_i(t,ℓ) (Proposition 8.1). The proofs systematically rely on the non-stickiness estimate imported from [17, Proposition 5.2] and on the well-posedness of the spider martingale problem from [17].

Significance. If the results are correct, this is a valuable extension of Walsh spider calculus to the case where the spinning measure is selected by the process's own local time. The paper is well organized as a sequence of independent problems, and the statements are precise about which results are imported from [17] and [18]. The Itô formula, if established, constitutes the foundation for the subsequent trajectory, approximation, Markov, and scattering results; the paper also makes original use of Fournier-Printems density techniques and extends Lévy's classical local-time approximations to a genuinely non-Markovian setting. The proofs are detailed but not machine-checked, and the central derivation contains a repairable gap in the excursion decomposition; the absolute-continuity argument also contains an erroneous estimate.

major comments (3)

The term M^{1,0,ε}_t is not controlled by the displayed estimate. Since τ^ε_0 = 0 and θ^ε_0 = inf{s≥0 : x(s)=ε}, if x⋆ > ε, the initial interval [0, θ^ε_0) lies entirely above level ε, so its quadratic variation ∫_0^{t∧θ^ε_0} σ^2_{i(s)}(∂_x f_{i(s)})^2 ds does not vanish as ε→0. Therefore inequality (14), bounding ⟨Σ_n M^{1,n,ε}(f)⟩_t by C∫_0^t 1_{x(u)≤ε} du, is false for the n=0 term, and the passage to (15) is not justified for starting points away from 0. This is an internal gap in the proof of the paper's central Itô formula, independent of the validity of the non-stickiness estimate. The gap appears repairable, for example by first stopping at the first hitting time of 0 and applying the excursion decomposition only after that time; as written, the proof is incomplete.
The bound E[(Y(1)-Z_ε)^2] ≤ Cε^2 is incorrect. With Z_ε = y_0 - W(1-ε), the Brownian increment W(1)-W(1-ε) contributes ε, not ε^2, so the first term on the right-hand side should be of order ε and the final bound is of order ε, not ε^2. Moreover, the remainder ∫_{1-ε}^1 h_{i(u)}(u,x(u),l(u)) du is not independent of Z_ε, and the integrand contains the chaotic edge process i(u); hence the hypotheses of Fournier-Printems [9, Theorem 3.1] are not verified as stated. The same issue affects Section 4.3, where the density claim for V(t) is asserted by appealing to the method of Fournier-Printems without checking the relevant conditions. Consequently, the absolute-continuity conclusions of Section 4 are not established by the arguments given.
The reasoning that the exponential martingale property of E_t(f) implies ∫_0^· ⟨Θ_s(f), d(m_s, M_s(f))⟩ ≡ 0 is not justified as written. What actually yields the conclusion is that the continuous local martingale N_t = ∫_0^t ⟨Θ_s(f), d(m_s, M_s(f))⟩ has zero quadratic variation, hence is constant; the exponential-martingale property alone does not imply the vanishing of N. This step is repairable by invoking the standard zero-quadratic-variation fact, but the proof needs to be rewritten.

minor comments (6)

There are several typos and notational inconsistencies: 'Feynmann-Kac' should be 'Feynman-Kac'; 'Skohokhod' should be 'Skorokhod'; 'where introduced' should be 'were introduced'; and the notation C^{1,2,1}_b(J_T × [0+∞)]) contains an extra bracket.
In the display after defining m_t, the equality ⟨m⟩_t = ∫_0^t σ^2_{i(s)}(s,x(s),l(s)) dW(s) = ⟨x⟩_t should have ds in place of dW(s).
The sum '∑_{j=0} α_j(s,l(s))∂_x u_i(s,0,l(s))' should run from j=1 to I, not from j=0.
The approximation (23) uses F(θ^ε_{n+1}) - F(τ^ε_n), while the stopping times are defined with θ^ε_n; the proof clarifies the intended intervals, but the statement should align the notation to avoid ambiguity.
The phrase 'this ladder case is excluded' should read 'this latter case is excluded'.
The symbol ℓ(t) is introduced for the integrated boundary term ∫_0^t Σ_j α_j(u,l(u))/σ_j(u,0+,l(u)) dl(u), which is easy to confuse with the local time l(t); a different notation would improve readability.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No derivation reduces to its inputs; reliance on accepted companion-paper estimates is prior work rather than circularity.

full rationale

The central result, Theorem 3.1, is derived from the spider martingale problem (Spi-Mar) together with the Brownian representation (2); it is not assumed as a martingale-problem condition. The proof's epsilon-to-zero passages use the non-stickiness estimate E[int_0^T 1_{x(u)<=epsilon} du] <= C epsilon from [17, Proposition 5.2], which is an independently stated companion-paper estimate under assumption (H) and is not the same as the Ito formula, absolute continuity, or scattering conclusions that the paper draws from it. Existence and uniqueness are imported from [17, Theorem 3.1] and PDE well-posedness from [18]; both are accepted or published results, and neither contains the target Ito calculus as a hidden premise. Section 8's scattering limit is obtained by applying the martingale property to x, x^2, and x 1_{x in R_i}, then proving E[l(theta_delta)-l]/delta -> 1 from those identities; alpha_i(t,l) is an input coefficient, not a fitted parameter, so the conclusion is a consistency statement rather than a prediction forced by construction. No fitted values or data appear anywhere. A reviewer-identified gap in the n=0 initial-excursion term of the proof of Theorem 3.1 is a correctness concern about the epsilon-to-zero limit, not a circularity, since the gap does not make the claimed formula equivalent to an input. Overall, the self-citations are load-bearing but are accepted prior work; the paper's new results have independent mathematical content.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The paper contributes proofs, not new free parameters or new entities. It relies on a set of assumptions and companion results: Assumption (H), the well-posedness and non-stickiness from [17], and the PDE well-posedness from [18]. These are not fitted values; they are conditions and theorems inherited from earlier work. The central claims are conditional on these inputs.

assumptions (6)

domain assumption Assumption (H): sigma_i >= sigma_0, alpha_i >= a in (0,1/I], and global Lipschitz regularity in t,x,l for sigma_i, b_i, alpha_i.
Stated in Section 2; used in every theorem; guarantees the martingale problem is well-posed and non-stickiness holds.
domain assumption Existence and uniqueness of the spider martingale problem (Spi-Mar) from [17, Theorem 2.1], including the local-time coordinate.
Imported from the companion paper; all path properties in this paper are properties of that unique measure.
domain assumption Non-stickiness estimate from [17, Prop. 5.2]: E[integral 1_{x(u) <= epsilon} du] <= C epsilon.
Used repeatedly in Sections 3, 4, 6, and 8; no proof is given in this paper.
domain assumption Extension of the martingale property to test functions in C^{1,2,0}_{{0},b} from [17, Prop. 6.4].
Used in Section 5 to apply the martingale property to the PDE solution u.
domain assumption Well-posedness of the local-time Kirchhoff parabolic system (20) in C^{1,2,0}_{{0},b}, from [18] and [17, Def. 6.1].
Section 5 assumes the PDE has a unique solution to represent probabilistically.
standard math Standard Itô calculus and Stroock-Varadhan martingale theory for continuous semimartingales.
Used in Sections 3, 6, and 7 without proof.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of On spider diffusions having a spinning measure selected from their own local time." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CWOTRL4W

@misc{pith2026250202754,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: On spider diffusions having a spinning measure selected from their own local time},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CWOTRL4W}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.02754}
}

abstract

The aim of this article is to give several results related to Walsh's spider diffusions living on a star-shaped network that have a spinning measure selected from the own local time of the motion at the vertex (cf.[17]). We prove the corresponding It\^o's formula and give some global trajectory properties such as $L^1$-approximation of the local time and the Markov property. Regarding the behavior of the process at the vertex, we show that that the distribution of the process is non atomic at the junction point and we characterize the instantaneous scattering distribution along some ray with the aid of the probability coefficients of diffraction. We obtain also a Feynmann-Kac representation for linear parabolic systems posed on star-shaped networks that where introduced in [18] possessing a so-called local-time Kirchhoff's boundary condition.

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

General diffusions on metric graphs as limits of time-space Markov Chains
math.PR 2025-07 conditional novelty 7.0 of 10

A new space-time Markov chain approximation for general diffusions on metric graphs is shown to converge in p-Wasserstein distance at explicit rates governed by a thinness quantifier of the subdivision.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

22 extracted references · 22 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

[17]

Martingale problem for a Walsh spider process with spinning measure se- lected from its own local-time

M.Martinez and I.Ohavi. Martingale problem for a Walsh spider process with spinning measure se- lected from its own local-time. Accepted, to appear in Elect ronic Journal of Probability

work page
[18]

Well posedness of linear Parab olic partial diﬀerential equation posed on a star-shaped network with local-time Kirchhoﬀ’s boundary c ondition at the vertex

M.Martinez and I.Ohavi. Well posedness of linear Parab olic partial diﬀerential equation posed on a star-shaped network with local-time Kirchhoﬀ’s boundary c ondition at the vertex. Journal of Mathe- matical Analysis and Applications, 537 (2), 2024

work page 2024
[9]

Absolute continuity for som e one-dimensional processes

N.Fournier and J.Printems. Absolute continuity for som e one-dimensional processes. Bernoulli,16, 2, 343–360, (2010). https://doi.org/10.3150/09-BEJ215

work page doi:10.3150/09-bej215 2010
[1]

Serve the shortest queue and Walsh Br ownian motion, The Annals of Applied Probability, 29,1, pp

R.Atar and A.Cohen. Serve the shortest queue and Walsh Br ownian motion, The Annals of Applied Probability, 29,1, pp. 613–651 2019

work page 2019
[2]

On Walsh’s Brownian moti ons

M.Barlow, J.Pitman, and M.Yor. On Walsh’s Brownian moti ons. Séminaire de Probabilités, XXIII, Lecture Notes in Math.,1372,275–293, Springer, Berlin, 19 89

work page
[3]

Variab ly skewed Brownian motion, Electronic Communications in Probability, 5, pp

M.Barlow, K.Burdzy, H.Kaspi, and A.Mandelbaum. Variab ly skewed Brownian motion, Electronic Communications in Probability, 5, pp. 57–66, 2000

work page 2000
[4]

Embedding of Walsh Brownian mo tion, Stochastic Processes and their Applications; 134, p.1-28, 2021

E.Bayraktar and X.Zhang. Embedding of Walsh Brownian mo tion, Stochastic Processes and their Applications; 134, p.1-28, 2021

work page 2021
[5]

Walsh Spider Diffusions as Time Changed Multi-parameter Processes

E.Bayraktar, J.Zhang and X.Zhang. Walsh diﬀusions as ti me changed multi-parameter process, preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.07101.7

work page Pith review arXiv

Show all 22 references

[6]

A study of Brownian motion using light scattering, American Journal of Physics, Vol

Clark N.A, Lunacek J.H, Benedek, G.B. A study of Brownian motion using light scattering, American Journal of Physics, Vol. 38, number 5, (1970)

1970
[7]

Diﬀusion processes on graphs: stochastic diﬀerential equations, large devia- tion principle

M.Freidlin and S-J.Sheu. Diﬀusion processes on graphs: stochastic diﬀerential equations, large devia- tion principle. Probability Theory and Related Fields, 116 (2), pp. 181-220, 2000

2000
[8]

Diﬀusion processes on gra phs and the averaging principle, Ann

M.Freidlin and A.D.Wentzell. Diﬀusion processes on gra phs and the averaging principle, Ann. Probab., The Annals of Probability, 21, 1993

1993
[10]

T.Ichiba, I.Karatzas, V.Prokaj and M. Yan. Stochastic integral equations for Walsh semimartingales, Annales de l’Institut Henri Poincaré Probabilités et Stati stiques, 54, 2018

2018
[11]

Stationary distributions a nd convergence for Walsh diﬀusions, Bernoulli

T.Ichiba and A.Sarantsev. Stationary distributions a nd convergence for Walsh diﬀusions, Bernoulli. Oﬃcial Journal of the Bernoulli Society for Mathematical St atistics and Probability, 25, 2019

2019
[12]

Semimartingales on rays, Walsh d iﬀusions, and related problems of control and stopping, Stochastic Processes and their Applications , 129, 2019

I.Karatzas and M.Yan. Semimartingales on rays, Walsh d iﬀusions, and related problems of control and stopping, Stochastic Processes and their Applications , 129, 2019

2019
[13]

Brownian Motion and Stocha stic Calculus, volume 113 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics

I.Karatzas and S.E.Shreve. Brownian Motion and Stocha stic Calculus, volume 113 of Graduate Texts in Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, New York, 2nd edition, 19 91
[14]

On the constructions of the skew Brownian moti on.Probab

A.Lejay. On the constructions of the skew Brownian moti on.Probab. Surveys 3(none): 413-466, 2006

2006
[15]

Viscosity solutions for j unctions: well posedness and stability

P.L.Lions and P.Souganidis. Viscosity solutions for j unctions: well posedness and stability. Rend. Lincei Mat. Appl. (2016). 27

2016
[16]

Well-posedness for multi -dimensional junction problems with Kirchhoﬀ- type conditions

P.L.Lions and P.Souganidis. Well-posedness for multi -dimensional junction problems with Kirchhoﬀ- type conditions. Rend. Lincei Mat. Appl. (2017), 28. SPIDER DIFFUSION WITH SPINNING MEASURE SELECTED FROM ITS OW N LOCAL TIME 37

2017
[19]

Comparison principle for Walsh’s spider HJB eq uations with non linear local time kirchhoﬀ’s boundary transmission

Ohavi I. Comparison principle for Walsh’s spider HJB eq uations with non linear local time kirchhoﬀ’s boundary transmission. Journal of Mathematical Analysis a nd Applications, 547 (2), 2025

2025
[20]

Multidimensional Diﬀus ion Processes, 2004

D.W.Stroock, S.R.S Varadhan. Multidimensional Diﬀus ion Processes, 2004

2004
[21]

Continuous martingales and Brownia n motion

D.Revuz and M.Yor. Continuous martingales and Brownia n motion. 3rd Edition. Springer, 1999

1999
[22]

Construction of right processes from e xcursions, Probability Theory and Related Fields, 73, 1986

T.S.Salisbury. Construction of right processes from e xcursions, Probability Theory and Related Fields, 73, 1986. Email address : miguel.martinez@univ-eiffel.fr Email address : isaac.ohavi@mail.huji.ac.il & isaac.ohavi@gmail.com

1986

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [17]

Martingale problem for a Walsh spider process with spinning measure se- lected from its own local-time

M.Martinez and I.Ohavi. Martingale problem for a Walsh spider process with spinning measure se- lected from its own local-time. Accepted, to appear in Elect ronic Journal of Probability

work page

[2] [18]

Well posedness of linear Parab olic partial diﬀerential equation posed on a star-shaped network with local-time Kirchhoﬀ’s boundary c ondition at the vertex

M.Martinez and I.Ohavi. Well posedness of linear Parab olic partial diﬀerential equation posed on a star-shaped network with local-time Kirchhoﬀ’s boundary c ondition at the vertex. Journal of Mathe- matical Analysis and Applications, 537 (2), 2024

work page 2024

[3] [9]

Absolute continuity for som e one-dimensional processes

N.Fournier and J.Printems. Absolute continuity for som e one-dimensional processes. Bernoulli,16, 2, 343–360, (2010). https://doi.org/10.3150/09-BEJ215

work page doi:10.3150/09-bej215 2010

[4] [1]

Serve the shortest queue and Walsh Br ownian motion, The Annals of Applied Probability, 29,1, pp

R.Atar and A.Cohen. Serve the shortest queue and Walsh Br ownian motion, The Annals of Applied Probability, 29,1, pp. 613–651 2019

work page 2019

[5] [2]

On Walsh’s Brownian moti ons

M.Barlow, J.Pitman, and M.Yor. On Walsh’s Brownian moti ons. Séminaire de Probabilités, XXIII, Lecture Notes in Math.,1372,275–293, Springer, Berlin, 19 89

work page

[6] [3]

Variab ly skewed Brownian motion, Electronic Communications in Probability, 5, pp

M.Barlow, K.Burdzy, H.Kaspi, and A.Mandelbaum. Variab ly skewed Brownian motion, Electronic Communications in Probability, 5, pp. 57–66, 2000

work page 2000

[7] [4]

Embedding of Walsh Brownian mo tion, Stochastic Processes and their Applications; 134, p.1-28, 2021

E.Bayraktar and X.Zhang. Embedding of Walsh Brownian mo tion, Stochastic Processes and their Applications; 134, p.1-28, 2021

work page 2021

[8] [5]

Walsh Spider Diffusions as Time Changed Multi-parameter Processes

E.Bayraktar, J.Zhang and X.Zhang. Walsh diﬀusions as ti me changed multi-parameter process, preprint https://arxiv.org/abs/2204.07101.7

work page Pith review arXiv