Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 84 references

A high-resolution microresonator-frequency-comb spectrometer

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A microresonator frequency comb, scanned by radio-frequency sidebands and read out in parallel by a VIPA-grating CCD, delivers 200-kHz spectral resolution over a 4-THz bandwidth in minutes.

desk verdict A credible microcomb spectrometer with a useful parallel-detection scheme, but the headline 200-kHz resolution is inferred from the laser linewidth, not demonstrated by the data. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.02878 v2 pith:RWRFSNQT submitted 2025-02-05 physics.optics

Ruocan Zhao , Bin Yang , Chuan Huang , Jiangtao Li , Baoqi Shi , Wei Sun , Chen Shen , Chong Wang
show 5 more authors
Tingdi Chen Chen Liang Xianghui Xue Junqiu Liu Xiankang Dou
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords microresonatorfrequencycombdissipativeKerrsolitonsdouble-sidebandmodulationVIPAgratingspectrometeropticalspectroscopysiliconnitridephotonicshigh-resolution
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Conventional spectrometers force a trade-off between how finely they can resolve frequency, how wide a window they can cover, and how quickly they can measure. This paper claims to break that trade-off by using a soliton microcomb, a broadband optical frequency comb generated in a silicon nitride microresonator, as the light source. Each comb line is split into two radio-frequency-swept sidebands, and the sidebands are scanned across the gaps between comb lines, so the optical spectrum is sampled with a frequency step set by an RF synthesizer rather than by the comb spacing. The comb lines are imaged in parallel onto a two-dimensional CCD through a VIPA-grating system, giving a measured resolution of 200 kHz over a 4-THz bandwidth in minutes-level measurement times. Because the comb is fully frequency-locked, the authors argue the approach stays robust against environmental fluctuations and can be miniaturized.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is radio-frequency-swept double-sideband scanning of a fully stabilized soliton microcomb. A soliton microcomb is a broadband frequency comb produced by dissipative Kerr solitons in a high-quality silicon nitride microresonator, with a repetition rate of 19.98 GHz. An electro-optic intensity modulator suppresses each comb line's carrier and creates two sidebands separated by $f_m$; changing $f_m$ moves the sidebands continuously through the frequency gaps between comb lines, transferring the precision of the RF domain to the optical domain. A virtually imaged phased array (VIPA) combined with a diffraction grating projects the comb lines onto a two-dimensional CCD, so all spectral components are recorded in parallel; the VIPA's 61-GHz free spectral range, about three times the comb spacing, separates the comb lines into three rows of spots. The spectral resolution is set by the pump laser linewidth, about 200 kHz, and the scan step $f_{\rm step}$, while frequency accuracy comes from the locked comb and a wavelength-meter-calibrated pixel map.

What would settle it

Measure a device with two known absorption features separated by 200 to 400 kHz, or a cavity resonance with a true linewidth below 200 kHz, and check whether the microcomb spectrometer resolves them; if the fitted width is set by the instrument rather than the true width, or if the two features merge into one, the claimed resolution is not reached.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that a dissipative-Kerr-soliton microcomb, fully stabilized by locking the pump laser to a reference cavity and the repetition rate to a rubidium clock, can act as the basis of a high-resolution spectrometer whose resolution is limited not by the comb mode spacing but by the linewidth of the comb itself, approximately 200 kHz. The key move is to intensity-modulate each comb line so that the carrier is suppressed and two sidebands appear at $\nu_n \pm f_m$; sweeping the modulation frequency $f_m$ from 1.5 to 8.5 GHz, and thermally shifting the pump by about 4 GHz to cover the blind spots, lets the sidebands sample every frequency between the comb lines. The VIPA-grating system disperses all comb lines onto a CCD simultaneously, so a single measurement cycle records the whole spectrum instead of scanning line by line. Demonstrations with an HCN gas cell, a silicon nitride microresonator, and an ultra-high-Q whispering-gallery-mode resonator yield fitted linewidths of 2.00 GHz, 45 MHz, and 1.8 MHz, respectively, which the authors present as evidence of sub-MHz resolution across a 4-THz span.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing assumption is that the measured spectral resolution is actually set by the 200-kHz pump laser linewidth and the scan step, rather than by extra broadening or crosstalk introduced by the VIPA-grating CCD imaging system; the data show a 1.8-MHz fitted resonance, not two features separated by 200 kHz, so the resolution claim is inferred rather than directly demonstrated.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the claim holds, a single instrument can deliver both wide bandwidth and high resolution without long sequential scans, so gas-cell spectra spanning 4 THz can be measured in seconds to minutes.
  • Because the accuracy is set by an RF reference and a locked comb, the spectrometer offers frequency traceability without an optical frequency comb stabilizer at the output; the reference chain is the same one used in metrology.
  • The optical core, including the laser, amplifier, microresonator, and modulator, can be integrated on a chip using established silicon nitride and III-V fabrication, moving laboratory-grade spectroscopy toward field instruments for astronomy, trace-gas detection, and isotope analysis.
  • Replacing the 200-kHz pump laser with an ultra-narrow-linewidth laser would, on the authors' argument, push resolution toward hertz level while keeping the same wide bandwidth.
  • The parallel CCD readout means the measurement time is set by the number of RF steps and camera readout, not by the number of comb lines; finer frequency steps trade time for resolution in a predictable way.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The authors infer 200-kHz resolution from the 200-kHz pump linewidth and a 200-kHz scan step; the narrowest feature they actually fit is 1.8 MHz wide, so a direct two-line resolution test would settle whether the VIPA-CCD path adds broadening.
  • The scheme scans only to $f_r/2$ and then relies on a 2 °C thermal shift of the microcomb to cover the remaining frequencies; a modulator with bandwidth beyond $f_r$ or a second modulation stage could in principle cover the full gap continuously, which the paper leaves untested.
  • If the VIPA-grating imaging truly adds no broadening, then narrowing the pump laser linewidth should improve resolution proportionally; verifying that scaling directly would confirm the resolution model.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript reports a spectrometer built around a soliton microcomb, electro-optic double-sideband modulation, and VIPA-grating CCD parallel detection. The comb is repetition-rate locked and the pump laser is PDH-locked to a Fabry-Perot cavity; scanning the RF modulation frequency fills the 20-GHz comb-line spacing, while the VIPA-grating system detects many comb lines simultaneously. Three demonstrations are presented: a 4-THz-spanning HCN transmission spectrum acquired with fstep = 50 MHz and compared to HITRAN, a Si3N4 microresonator spectrum acquired with fstep = 1 MHz, and a ultrahigh-Q WGM resonator spectrum acquired with fstep = 200 kHz, whose narrowest fitted resonance has a 1.8-MHz FWHM. The abstract and conclusion claim 200-kHz resolution across a 4-THz bandwidth with minutes-level processing time, with the resolution attributed to the pump-laser linewidth and the scan step.

Significance. If fully supported, the architecture would be significant because it combines the broad bandwidth of a microcomb with RF-domain frequency stepping and parallel CCD readout, offering a path toward miniaturized high-resolution spectrometers. The paper has real strengths: the repetition-rate locking is quantified (σ = 52 Hz), the pump-laser linewidth is measured by heterodyne beat with a reference comb (approximately 200 kHz), the HCN result is checked against an external HITRAN database, and three different devices are measured. The core idea of scanning modulated sidebands across comb-line gaps while using VIPA-grating parallel detection is coherent and internally consistent. The main gap is that the headline resolution is inferred rather than directly demonstrated, and the wide-bandwidth and fine-resolution numbers come from separate measurements.

major comments (3)
  1. [Measurement of transmission spectra; Spectral frequency determination] The central claim of 200-kHz resolution is not directly demonstrated. The narrowest measured feature is the 1.8-MHz WGM resonance in Fig. 3(f), and a 1.8-MHz-wide feature would appear 1.8-MHz wide on a much finer instrument; therefore the data support at most 1.8-MHz instrument resolution, not 200 kHz. No measurement resolves two spectral features separated by 200 kHz, and no direct characterization of the instrument response at the 200-kHz scale (e.g., the VIPA-CCD point-spread function or the linewidth of a modulated sideband) is provided. The statement in 'Spectral frequency determination' that 'the ultimate spectral resolution is limited by the laser linewidth, which is 200 KHz' is load-bearing and unvalidated by any reported experiment. The authors should either measure a sub-200-kHz reference feature, resolve two features 200 kHz apart, or characterize the instrument function with a narrow-linewidth calibration source; absent that, the demonstrated resolution should be stated as at best 1.8 MHz.
  2. [Measurement of transmission spectra; Abstract] The abstract's simultaneous claim of 200-kHz resolution across a 4-THz bandwidth is not supported by any single dataset. The 4-THz HCN scan in Fig. 3(a) used fstep = 50 MHz, so its spectral sampling interval is 50 MHz; the 200-kHz-step WGM scan in Fig. 3(e) spans only 1545.3779 to 1545.4001 nm, approximately 2.8 GHz. To claim 200-kHz resolution across 4 THz, the paper must either present a single measurement over the full bandwidth with fine sampling or clearly state that the 4-THz bandwidth and the 200-kHz resolution were achieved in separate configurations with different fstep values.
  3. [Supplementary Note 2; Spectral frequency determination] The resolution claim assumes that the comb-line linewidth and the EOM-modulated sideband linewidth are equal to the 200-kHz pump-laser linewidth, but only the pump-laser linewidth is measured (Supplementary Note 2). The comb lines are locked via repetition-rate feedback, and the sidebands are generated by intensity modulation; both processes can add phase noise or broadening beyond the free-running pump linewidth. A direct measurement of a comb-line or sideband linewidth (for example, by heterodyning an individual sideband against a narrow reference laser, or by using a reference cavity with a sub-200-kHz linewidth) is needed. Without such a measurement, the statement that resolution is 'constrained only by the comb-line linewidth' remains an assumption.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Spectral frequency determination] The phrase 'the ultimate spectral resolution is limited by the laser linewidth, which is 200 KHz' uses 'KHz' with incorrect capitalization; it should be '200 kHz'.
  2. [Measurement of transmission spectra] In the sentence describing the HCN line at 1554.56 nm, 'V oigt' contains a stray space and should read 'Voigt'.
  3. [Spectral frequency determination] The term 'sample resolution' is used for fstep, but fstep is a sampling grid interval, not by itself the spectral resolution; the resolution also depends on the linewidths of the source and the VIPA-CCD instrument function. Please clarify this distinction in the text.
  4. [Supplementary Note 2] The pump-laser long-term stability is reported as a standard deviation of σ = 0.026 MHz; specifying the measurement gate time and averaging bandwidth would make this quantitative result more useful.
  5. [Supplementary Note 3] The HCN/HITRAN comparison is described only qualitatively as 'agreeable'; adding a residual plot or an RMS frequency-error estimate would allow readers to judge the frequency-axis accuracy independently.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the spectrometer claim is an experimental demonstration with external calibration (tunable laser plus locked comb, HITRAN comparison); the 200-kHz resolution is inferred from the measured pump linewidth and scan step, not derived from a fitted parameter or self-citation chain.

full rationale

This is an experimental measurement paper rather than a theoretical derivation, and I found no load-bearing step that reduces to its own inputs. The frequency axis is established by a one-to-one pixel-to-wavelength calibration with a tunable laser, combined with a rubidium-referenced repetition rate and a wavelength-meter measurement of the pump frequency; each sideband frequency is then determined from the locked comb parameters and the known microwave modulation frequency. The HCN transmission spectrum is compared directly with the HITRAN database, providing an external, independently generated reference. The 200-kHz resolution claim is not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction: it is stated as 'The ultimate spectral resolution is limited by the laser linewidth, which is 200 KHz in our system,' and the WGM measurement uses fstep = 200 kHz, 'corresponding to the laser linewidth.' The narrowest measured feature is 1.8 MHz, so the paper infers, rather than directly demonstrates, 200-kHz instrument resolution; this is a soundness or validation concern about possible extra broadening from the VIPA-CCD readout, modulation noise, or comb-line excess linewidth, not a circularity. Self-citations appear (e.g., the vector spectrum analyzer used for resonator characterization, and the group's own prior microcomb work), but they are not used to justify the central spectrometer claim; the central claim rests on the reported measurements, calibration procedure, and external HITRAN comparison. Therefore the appropriate finding is no significant circularity, score 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claim rests on frequency calibration, the ideal frequency comb relation, sideband generation, and the assumption that the VIPA-grating CCD detection does not add broadening. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)
  • CCD pixel-to-frequency calibration = tunable-laser calibration in 0.02 nm steps
    The absolute frequency axis is assigned by mapping CCD pixel positions with a tunable laser and then using the locked comb frequencies. The accuracy of every reported spectral frequency depends on this fitted mapping.
assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption Comb line frequencies are exactly νn = νp ± n fr, with fr locked to 19.9759150 GHz and νp determined by wavemeter.
    Used throughout 'Spectral frequency determination'; the entire sideband frequency assignment rests on this relation.
  • domain assumption The intensity modulator generates sidebands at νn ± fm with negligible residual carrier and no additional frequency shifts.
    Used in 'Principle and experimental setup'; sideband frequencies are taken as νn ± fm when reconstructing spectra.
  • domain assumption The VIPA-grating system maps each sideband frequency to a stable CCD position, and the measured spot intensity is proportional to the DUT transmission at that sideband frequency.
    Assumed in 'Measurement of transmission spectra'; no independent calibration of the VIPA instrument response is shown.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of A high-resolution microresonator-frequency-comb spectrometer." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/RWRFSNQT

@misc{pith2026250202878,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: A high-resolution microresonator-frequency-comb spectrometer},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/RWRFSNQT}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.02878}
}
read the original abstract

Spectral analysis is one of the most powerful technologies for studying and understanding matter. As the devices for spectral analysis, spectrometers are widely used in material detection, isotope analysis, trace gas detection, and the study of atomic and molecular hyperfine structures. While high resolution, wide bandwidth and fast speed are essential factors, they are always trade-offs for conventional spectrometers. Here, we present a soliton-microcomb-based spectrometer that overcomes these challenges by integrating dissipative Kerr solitons (DKSs) with double-sideband modulation and parallelized detection. Leveraging a high-quality silicon nitride microresonator, we generate a broadband, fully stabilized soliton microcomb and employ radio-frequency-modulated double sidebands to scan the optical spectrum with the resolution constrained only by the comb-line linewidth. By projecting the comb lines onto a two-dimensional charge-coupled device (CCD) via a virtually imaged phased array (VIPA)-grating system, we enable parallel processing of all spectral components, circumventing sequential scanning delays. The resulting spectrometer achieves 200-kHz resolution across a 4-THz bandwidth with minutes-level processing time while maintaining robustness against environmental fluctuations. Being promising for miniaturization, this work bridges the gap between laboratory-grade performance and field-deployable practicality, unlocking new possibilities for spectroscopy in astronomy, metrology, and integrated photonics.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.02878 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Schematic and the principle of the microcomb spectrometer. A soliton microcomb is generated in a Si3N4 mi￾croresonator. After passing through an electro-optic intensity modulator, the comb lines are suppressed, and symmetric sidebands are generated. By adjusting the modulation frequency, the sidebands can scan across the frequency gap between the comb lines. These scanning sidebands interact with matters, encoding t… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Experimental setup and imaging process. (a). Setup of the microcomb spectrometer. CTL: continuously tunable laser; FP: Fabry-Perot cavity; EDFA: erbium-doped fiber amplifier; AOM: acoustic-optic modulator; PID: proportional-integral-derivative ´ controller; LPF: low-pass filter; FM: frequency mixer; PD: photodetector; EOM: electro-optic modulator; DUT: device under test; PS: polarization scrambler; CoL: collimating … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Three applications on spectral analysis. (a). The spectral measurement of an HCN gas cell. Panel (b) corresponds to the absorption line at 1554.56 nm in panel (a), with the measured linewidth of 2.00 GHz. (c). The spectral measurement of a Si3N4 microresonator. Panel (d) corresponds to the transmission absorption feature at 1545.35 nm in panel (c), with the measured linewidth of 45 MHz. (e). The spectral measurement… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Envision of a miniaturized microcomb spectrometer. The core components of the microcomb spectrometer, includ￾ing the laser source, the optical amplifier, the Si3N4 microresonator, and the electro-optic modulator, can be integrated monolithically on a chip. The others, …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 58 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    & Loewen, E

    Palmer, C. & Loewen, E. G. Diffraction grating handbook. Newport Corporation New York (2005)

    2005

  2. [2]

    Griffiths, P. R. Fourier transform infrared spectrometry. Science 222, 297–302 (1983). URL https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.6623077. https: //www.science.org/doi/pdf/10.1126/science.6623077

    doi:10.1126/science.6623077 1983

  3. [3]

    Fabry-perot interferometers

    Hern ´andez, G. Fabry-perot interferometers. Cambridge University Press (1988)

    1988

  4. [4]

    & H ¨ansch, T

    Udem, T., Holzwarth, R. & H ¨ansch, T. W. Optical frequency metrology. Nature 416, 233 (2002). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/416233a

    doi:10.1038/416233a 2002

  5. [5]

    Cundiff, S. T. & Ye, J. Colloquium: Femtosecond optical frequency combs. Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 325–342 (2003). URL https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys. 75.325

    doi:10.1103/revmodphys 2003

  6. [6]

    & Baumann, E

    Fortier, T. & Baumann, E. 20 years of developments in optical frequency comb technology and applications. Communications Physics 2, 153 (2019). URL https://doi.org/10. 1038/s42005-019-0249-y

    2019

  7. [7]

    & Swann, W

    Coddington, I., Newbury, N. & Swann, W. Dual-comb spectroscopy. Optica 3, 414 (2016). URL https://www.osapublishing.org/abstract.cfm?URI= optica-3-4-414

    2016

  8. [8]

    & H ¨ansch, T

    Picqu ´e, N. & H ¨ansch, T. W. Frequency comb spectroscopy. Nature Photonics 13, 146–157 (2019). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-018-0347-5

    doi:10.1038/s41566-018-0347-5 2019

Show all 84 references
  1. [9]

    A., Vahala, K

    Diddams, S. A., Vahala, K. & Udem, T. Optical frequency combs: Coherently uniting the electromagnetic spectrum. Science 369, eaay3676 (2020). URL https://science. sciencemag.org/content/369/6501/eaay3676. 12

    2020

  2. [10]

    L., Holzwarth, R

    Del’Haye, P., Arcizet, O., Gorodetsky, M. L., Holzwarth, R. & Kippenberg, T. J. Frequency comb assisted diode laser spectroscopy for measurement of microcavity dispersion. Na- ture Photonics 3, 529–533 (2009). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphoton. 2009.138

    2009 doi

  3. [11]

    R., Coddington, I., Baumann, E., Swann, W

    Giorgetta, F. R., Coddington, I., Baumann, E., Swann, W. C. & Newbury, N. R. Fast high- resolution spectroscopy of dynamic continuous-wave laser sources. Nature Photonics 4, 853– 857 (2010). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2010.228

    2010 doi

  4. [12]

    Shi, B. et al. An alkali-referenced vector spectrum analyzer for visible-light integrated pho- tonics. arXiv:2406.13323 (2024). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2406.13323

    2024 arXiv

  5. [13]

    & Yao, J

    Tang, Z., Pan, S. & Yao, J. A high resolution optical vector network analyzer based on a wideband and wavelength-tunable optical single-sideband modulator. Opt. Express 20, 6555–6560 (2012). URL https://opg.optica.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI= oe-20-6-6555

    2012

  6. [14]

    & Xue, M

    Pan, S. & Xue, M. Ultrahigh-resolution optical vector analysis based on optical single- sideband modulation. Journal of Lightwave Technology 35, 836–845 (2017)

    2017

  7. [15]

    & Pan, S

    Qing, T., Li, S., Tang, Z., Gao, B. & Pan, S. Optical vector analysis with attometer resolution, 90-db dynamic range and thz bandwidth. Nature Communications 10, 5135 (2019). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-13129-x

    2019 doi

  8. [16]

    Li, J., Lee, H., Yang, K. Y . & Vahala, K. J. Sideband spectroscopy and dispersion mea- surement in microcavities. Opt. Express 20, 26337–26344 (2012). URL http://www. opticsexpress.org/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-20-24-26337

    2012

  9. [17]

    Twayana, K. et al. Frequency-comb-calibrated swept-wavelength interferometry. Opt. Ex- press 29, 24363–24372 (2021). URL https://opg.optica.org/oe/abstract. cfm?URI=oe-29-15-24363. 13

    2021

  10. [18]

    Luo, Y .-H. et al. A wideband, high-resolution vector spectrum analyzer for integrated pho- tonics. Light: Science & Applications 13 (2024). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41377-024-01435-z

    2024

  11. [19]

    & Hasan, T

    Yang, Z., Albrow-Owen, T., Cai, W. & Hasan, T. Miniaturization of optical spectrometers.Sci- ence 371, eabe0722 (2021). URL https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/ science.abe0722

    2021

  12. [20]

    Li, A. et al. Advances in cost-effective integrated spectrometers. Light: Science & Applica- tions 11, 174 (2022). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41377-022-00853-1

    2022 doi

  13. [21]

    Ryckeboer, E. et al. Silicon-on-insulator spectrometers with integrated gainassb photodiodes for wide-band spectroscopy from 1510 to 2300 nm.Opt. Express 21, 6101–6108 (2013). URL https://opg.optica.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-21-5-6101

    2013

  14. [22]

    Pohl, D. et al. An integrated broadband spectrometer on thin-film lithium niobate.Nature Pho- tonics 14, 24–29 (2020). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-019-0529-9

    2020 doi

  15. [23]

    Yang, Z. et al. Single-nanowire spectrometers. Science 365, 1017–1020 (2019). URLhttps: //www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/science.aax8814

    2019 doi

  16. [24]

    Yoon, H. H. et al. Miniaturized spectrometers with a tunable van der waals junction. Sci- ence 378, 296–299 (2022). URL https://www.science.org/doi/abs/10.1126/ science.add8544

    2022

  17. [25]

    Zhang, Z. et al. Integrated scanning spectrometer with a tunable micro-ring resonator and an arrayed waveguide grating. Photon. Res. 10, A74–A81 (2022). URL https://opg. optica.org/prj/abstract.cfm?URI=prj-10-5-A74

    2022

  18. [26]

    Ni, Y . et al. Computational spectropolarimetry with a tunable liquid crystal metasurface. eLight 2, 23 (2022). URL https://doi.org/10.1186/s43593-022-00032-0. 14

    2022 doi

  19. [27]

    Li, Y . et al. A platform for integrated spectrometers based on solution-processable semicon- ductors. Light: Science & Applications 12, 184 (2023). URL https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41377-023-01231-1

    2023

  20. [28]

    Cen, Q. et al. Microtaper leaky-mode spectrometer with picometer resolution. eLight 3, 9 (2023). URL https://doi.org/10.1186/s43593-023-00041-7

    2023 doi

  21. [29]

    & Herkommer, A

    Toulouse, A., Drozella, J., Thiele, S., Giessen, H. & Herkommer, A. 3d-printed miniature spectrometer for the visible range with a 100 × 100µm 2 footprint. Light: Advanced Manu- facturing 2, 20–30 (2021). URL https://www.light-am.com/en/article/doi/ 10.37188/lam.2021.002

    2021 doi

  22. [30]

    & Tsang, H

    Xu, H., Qin, Y ., Hu, G. & Tsang, H. K. Breaking the resolution-bandwidth limit of chip-scale spectrometry by harnessing a dispersion-engineered photonic molecule. Light: Science & Applications 12, 64 (2023). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41377-023-01102-9

    2023

  23. [31]

    Herr, T. et al. Temporal solitons in optical microresonators. Nature Photonics 8, 145 (2013). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2013.343

    2013 doi

  24. [32]

    J., Gaeta, A

    Kippenberg, T. J., Gaeta, A. L., Lipson, M. & Gorodetsky, M. L. Dissipative Kerr soli- tons in optical microresonators. Science 361, eaan8083 (2018). URL http://science. sciencemag.org/content/361/6402/eaan8083

    2018

  25. [33]

    L., Lipson, M

    Gaeta, A. L., Lipson, M. & Kippenberg, T. J. Photonic-chip-based frequency combs. Nature Photonics 13, 158–169 (2019). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41566-019-0358-x

    2019

  26. [34]

    Xue, X. et al. Mode-locked dark pulse Kerr combs in normal-dispersion microresonators. Na- ture Photonics 9, 594 (2015). URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2015. 137. 15

    2015 doi

  27. [35]

    Y ., Suh, M.-G

    Yi, X., Yang, Q.-F., Yang, K. Y ., Suh, M.-G. & Vahala, K. Soliton frequency comb at microwave rates in a high- Q silica microresonator. Optica 2, 1078–1085 (2015). URL http://www.osapublishing.org/optica/abstract.cfm?URI= optica-2-12-1078

    2015

  28. [36]

    Brasch, V . et al. Photonic chip–based optical frequency comb using soliton Cherenkov ra- diation. Science 351, 357–360 (2016). URL http://science.sciencemag.org/ content/351/6271/357

    2016

  29. [37]

    Joshi, C. et al. Thermally controlled comb generation and soliton modelocking in microres- onators. Opt. Lett. 41, 2565–2568 (2016). URL http://ol.osa.org/abstract. cfm?URI=ol-41-11-2565

    2016

  30. [38]

    Liang, W. et al. High spectral purity Kerr frequency comb radio frequency photonic os- cillator. Nature Communications 6, 7957 (2015). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ ncomms8957

    2015

  31. [39]

    Yang, K. Y . et al. Bridging ultrahigh-q devices and photonic circuits. Nature Photonics 12, 297–302 (2018). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-018-0132-5

    2018 doi

  32. [40]

    He, Y . et al. Self-starting bi-chromatic linbo3 soliton microcomb. Optica 6, 1138–1144 (2019). URL http://www.osapublishing.org/optica/abstract.cfm?URI= optica-6-9-1138

    2019

  33. [41]

    Wang, C. et al. Monolithic lithium niobate photonic circuits for kerr frequency comb genera- tion and modulation. Nature Communications 10, 978 (2019). URL https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41467-019-08969-6

    2019 doi

  34. [42]

    Bao, H. et al. Laser cavity-soliton microcombs. Nature Photonics 13, 384–389 (2019). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-019-0379-5

    2019 doi

  35. [43]

    Liu, X. et al. Aluminum nitride nanophotonics for beyond-octave soliton microcomb gen- eration and self-referencing. Nature Communications 12, 5428 (2021). URL https: //doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-25751-9. 16

    2021 doi

  36. [44]

    & Yvind, K

    Pu, M., Ottaviano, L., Semenova, E. & Yvind, K. Efficient frequency comb generation in algaas-on-insulator. Optica 3, 823–826 (2016). URL http://www.osapublishing. org/optica/abstract.cfm?URI=optica-3-8-823

    2016

  37. [45]

    A., Lukin, D

    Guidry, M. A., Lukin, D. M., Yang, K. Y ., Trivedi, R. & Vu ˇckovi´c, J. Quantum optics of soliton microcombs. Nature Photonics 16, 52–58 (2022). URL https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41566-021-00901-z

    2022

  38. [46]

    Jung, H. et al. Tantala kerr nonlinear integrated photonics. Optica 8, 811–817 (2021). URL https://opg.optica.org/optica/abstract.cfm?URI=optica-8-6-811

    2021

  39. [47]

    Xia, D. et al. Integrated chalcogenide photonics for microresonator soliton combs. Laser & Photonics Reviews n/a, 2200219 (2022). URL https://doi.org/10.1002/lpor. 202200219

    2022 doi

  40. [48]

    Yao, B.-C. et al. Interdisciplinary advances in microcombs: bridging physics and in- formation technology. eLight 4, 19 (2024). URL https://doi.org/10.1186/ s43593-024-00071-9

    2024

  41. [49]

    Marin-Palomo, P. et al. Microresonator-based solitons for massively parallel coherent op- tical communications. Nature 546, 274 (2017). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ nature22387

    2017

  42. [50]

    Trocha, P. et al. Ultrafast optical ranging using microresonator soliton frequency combs. Science 359, 887–891 (2018). URL http://science.sciencemag.org/content/ 359/6378/887

    2018

  43. [51]

    & Vahala, K

    Suh, M.-G. & Vahala, K. J. Soliton microcomb range measurement. Science 359, 884–887 (2018). URL http://science.sciencemag.org/content/359/6378/884

    2018

  44. [52]

    Obrzud, E. et al. A microphotonic astrocomb. Nature Photonics 13, 31–35 (2019). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-018-0309-y. 17

    2019 doi

  45. [53]

    Suh, M.-G. et al. Searching for exoplanets using a microresonator astrocomb. Nature Photon- ics 13, 25–30 (2019). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41566-018-0312-3

    2019 doi

  46. [54]

    Dutt, A. et al. On-chip dual-comb source for spectroscopy. Science Advances 4, e1701858. URL https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.1701858

    doi

  47. [55]

    Yang, Q.-F. et al. Vernier spectrometer using counterpropagating soliton microcombs.Science 363, 965–968 (2019). URL https://science.sciencemag.org/content/363/ 6430/965

    2019

  48. [56]

    Feldmann, J. et al. Parallel convolutional processing using an integrated photonic tensor core. Nature 589, 52–58 (2021). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41586-020-03070-1

    2021

  49. [57]

    Xu, X. et al. 11 tops photonic convolutional accelerator for optical neural networks. Nature 589, 44–51 (2021). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-03063-0

    2021 doi

  50. [58]

    Spencer, D. T. et al. An optical-frequency synthesizer using integrated photonics. Nature 557, 81–85 (2018). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0065-7

    2018 doi

  51. [59]

    Newman, Z. L. et al. Architecture for the photonic integration of an optical atomic clock. Optica 6, 680–685 (2019). URL http://www.osapublishing.org/optica/ abstract.cfm?URI=optica-6-5-680

    2019

  52. [60]

    Shu, H. et al. Microcomb-driven silicon photonic systems. Nature 605, 457–463 (2022). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-04579-3

    2022 doi

  53. [61]

    Stern, B., Ji, X., Okawachi, Y ., Gaeta, A. L. & Lipson, M. Battery-operated integrated fre- quency comb generator. Nature 562, 401–405 (2018). URL https://doi.org/10. 1038/s41586-018-0598-9

    2018

  54. [62]

    Xiang, C. et al. Laser soliton microcombs heterogeneously integrated on silicon. Science 373, 99–103 (2021). URL https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abh2076. 18

    2021 doi

  55. [63]

    Liu, J. et al. Monolithic piezoelectric control of soliton microcombs. Nature 583, 385–390 (2020). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-2465-8

    2020 doi

  56. [64]

    Churaev, M. et al. A heterogeneously integrated lithium niobate-on-silicon nitride photonic platform. Nature Communications 14, 3499 (2023). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41467-023-39047-7

    2023

  57. [65]

    de Beeck, C. O. et al. Heterogeneous III-V on silicon nitride amplifiers and lasers via micro- transfer printing. Optica 7, 386–393 (2020). URL http://www.osapublishing.org/ optica/abstract.cfm?URI=optica-7-5-386

    2020

  58. [66]

    Sun, W. et al. A chip-integrated comb-based microwave oscillator. arXiv 2403.02828 (2024). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2403.02828

    2024 arXiv

  59. [67]

    A., Hollberg, L

    Diddams, S. A., Hollberg, L. & Mbele, V . Molecular fingerprinting with the resolved modes of a femtosecond laser frequency comb. Nature 445, 627–630 (2007). URL https://doi. org/10.1038/nature05524

    2007 doi

  60. [68]

    & Vahala, K

    Bao, C., Suh, M.-G. & Vahala, K. Microresonator soliton dual-comb imaging. Optica 6, 1110–1116 (2019). URL https://opg.optica.org/optica/abstract.cfm? URI=optica-6-9-1110

    2019

  61. [69]

    Y ., Yi, X

    Suh, M.-G., Yang, Q.-F., Yang, K. Y ., Yi, X. & Vahala, K. J. Microresonator soliton dual-comb spectroscopy. Science 354, 600–603 (2016). URL https:// science.sciencemag.org/content/354/6312/600. https://science. sciencemag.org/content/354/6312/600.full.pdf

    2016

  62. [70]

    Guo, H. et al. Universal dynamics and deterministic switching of dissipative kerr solitons in optical microresonators. Nature Physics 13, 94–102 (2017). URL https://doi.org/ 10.1038/nphys3893

    2017 doi

  63. [71]

    Qing, T. et al. Vector spectrometer with hertz-level resolution and super-recognition capability. arXiv:2402.09752 (2024). URL https://arxiv.org/abs/2402.09752. 19

    2024 arXiv

  64. [72]

    & Lin, C

    Xiao, S., Weiner, A. & Lin, C. A dispersion law for virtually imaged phased-array spectral dispersers based on paraxial wave theory. IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 40, 420–426 (2004)

    2004

  65. [73]

    Thomson, D. et al. Roadmap on silicon photonics. Journal of Optics 18, 073003 (2016). URL https://doi.org/10.1088%2F2040-8978%2F18%2F7%2F073003

    2016

  66. [74]

    The commercialization of silicon photonics

    Rickman, A. The commercialization of silicon photonics. Nature Photonics 8, 579–582 (2014). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2014.175

    2014 doi

  67. [75]

    & Bowers, J

    Xiang, C. & Bowers, J. E. Building 3D integrated circuits with electronics and pho- tonics. Nature Electronics 7, 422–424 (2024). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/ s41928-024-01187-z

    2024

  68. [76]

    Liu, J. et al. High-yield, wafer-scale fabrication of ultralow-loss, dispersion-engineered silicon nitride photonic circuits. Nature Communications 12, 2236 (2021). URL https://doi. org/10.1038/s41467-021-21973-z

    2021 doi

  69. [77]

    Chang, L. et al. Heterogeneous integration of lithium niobate and silicon nitride waveguides for wafer-scale photonic integrated circuits on silicon. Opt. Lett. 42, 803–806 (2017). URL http://ol.osa.org/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-42-4-803

    2017

  70. [78]

    Roelkens, G. et al. Present and future of micro-transfer printing for heterogeneous photonic in- tegrated circuits. APL Photonics 9, 010901 (2024). URL https://doi.org/10.1063/ 5.0181099

    2024

  71. [79]

    & Michel, J

    Zhou, Z., Yin, B. & Michel, J. On-chip light sources for silicon photonics. Light: Science & Applications 4, e358–e358 (2015). URL https://doi.org/10.1038/lsa.2015. 131

    2015 doi

  72. [80]

    Zhou, Z. et al. Prospects and applications of on-chip lasers. eLight 3, 1 (2023). URL https: //doi.org/10.1186/s43593-022-00027-x. 20

    2023 doi

  73. [81]

    An integrated space-to-ground quantum communication network over 4,600 kilometres

    Chen, Y .-A.et al. An integrated space-to-ground quantum communication network over 4,600 kilometres. Nature 589, 214–219 (2021)

    2021

  74. [82]

    de Beeck, C. O. et al. III/V-on-lithium niobate amplifiers and lasers. Optica 8, 1288– 1289 (2021). URL https://opg.optica.org/optica/abstract.cfm?URI= optica-8-10-1288

    2021

  75. [83]

    Liu, Y . et al. Ultrastable vacuum-gap fabry–perot cavities operated in air. Optica 11, 1205–1211 (2024). URL https://opg.optica.org/optica/abstract.cfm? URI=optica-11-9-1205

    2024

  76. [84]

    Jin, N. et al. Micro-fabricated mirrors with finesse exceeding one million. Optica 9, 965–970 (2022). URL https://opg.optica.org/optica/abstract.cfm?URI= optica-9-9-965. Acknowledgements:This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 421...

    2022 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.