Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 7 minor 46 references

Spatial-offset pump-probe imaging of nonradiative dynamics at optical resolution

T0 review · 2 major / 7 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper claims that spatially offsetting the pump and probe beams in a pulsed-laser microscope lets one map photoacoustic pressure and photothermal heat fields simultaneously, at micrometer spatial resolution and nanosecond timescales…

desk verdict SOPPI is a genuinely new measurement idea, but the headline 9.9 Pa sensitivity is measured with 400x averaging while imaging runs single-shot, so the per-pixel sensitivity is about 20x worse than advertised. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.03384 v2 pith:K7JTEBTD submitted 2025-02-05 physics.optics physics.app-ph

Guo Chen , Yuhao Yuan , Hongli Ni , Guangrui Ding , Mingsheng Li , Yifan Zhu , Deming Li , Hongru Zeng
show 4 more authors
Hongjian He Zhongyue Guo Ji-Xin Cheng Chen Yang
This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.opticsphysics.app-ph
keywords spatial-offsetpump-probeimagingphotoacousticphotothermalnonradiativerelaxationvirtualtransducerarraycomputedtomographyrefractiveindexsensingultrasoundpropagation
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces spatial-offset pump-probe imaging (SOPPI), a method that maps the pressure and temperature fields produced by nonradiative relaxation. By spatially separating the pump beam that excites an absorber and the probe beam that senses refractive-index changes, SOPPI records both photoacoustic (PA) and photothermal (PT) signals at the same time, with 6-micrometer spatial resolution and 5.6-nanosecond temporal resolution. The authors demonstrate PA waves propagating through water, through a mouse brain slice, and across a skull, and they use the data to reconstruct pigment distributions inside a zebrafish larva via photoacoustic computed tomography. The central claim is that a single optical platform can quantitatively visualize both wave types in scattering tissue, something no single existing detector could do.

What carries the argument

The core mechanism is the spatially offset pump-probe configuration: a pulsed pump beam excites an absorber while a continuous-wave 1310 nm probe beam, focused and scanned at a controllable offset, senses local refractive-index changes caused by pressure and temperature. The probe's intensity modulation is digitized at 180 MHz, and a 500 kHz high-pass filter separates the fast PA component from the slow PT component. A virtual transducer array is formed by scanning the probe position around the sample and feeding the time traces into a weighted delay-and-sum beamformer for PACT reconstruction.

What would settle it

A direct experimental check would compare SOPPI-measured PA pressure amplitudes inside a heterogeneous phantom (e.g., through a brain slice or skull) with a calibrated hydrophone or fiber-optic hydrophone placed at the same location; if the SOPPI signal amplitude deviates from the true pressure by more than the stated calibration error as a function of depth or incidence angle, the quantitative field-mapping claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper claims that SOPPI can image PA and PT wave propagation simultaneously by offsetting the pump and probe beams, detecting refractive-index changes in the surrounding medium rather than only at the absorber. This yields a noise-equivalent pressure of 9.9 Pa, a detection bandwidth of 65 MHz, and optical-resolution spatial mapping. The authors observe acousto-thermal conversion at a fiber/water boundary, PA generated by evanescent waves, back-propagated acoustic Mach cones, and ultrasound transmission of about 99% through a brain slice and about 21% through a mouse skull. They further build SOPPI-PACT, a photoacoustic computed tomography system that uses the scanned probe beam as a virtual transducer array, reconstructing pigment distribution in a zebrafish larva with 26-micrometer resolution.

Load-bearing premise

The recorded probe modulation is a faithful, quantitative proxy for the local pressure and temperature at every scanned point, including inside brain tissue, across skull, and across the full 65 MHz bandwidth; the only absolute calibration is a single comparison with a hydrophone at a fixed 300-micrometer distance in water.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • SOPPI gives a single platform for simultaneous PA and PT visualization, so the generation and propagation of both fields can be studied in one experiment.
  • Optical-resolution PA mapping resolves high-frequency components (wavelength about 75 micrometers) that a needle hydrophone with a 45-micrometer element cannot sample, enabling observation of acoustic-lens focusing.
  • SOPPI can map ultrasound propagation inside scattering brain tissue and across skull, yielding quantitative transmission values of 99% through the brain/PBS boundary and 21% through the skull.
  • SOPPI-PACT reconstructs pigment distribution in a zebrafish larva with 26-micrometer resolution and improved signal-to-noise ratio compared with physical transducer arrays having about 100-micrometer pitch.
  • Because the virtual transducer is programmable and scanned around the sample, full-angle detection removes the limited-view problem of linear transducer arrays.
  • The 65 MHz bandwidth is currently limited by the digitizer, so faster detectors and digitizers could extend detection to gigahertz frequencies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the probe signal is linearly proportional to pressure and temperature across heterogeneous media, SOPPI could be extended to map shear-wave or elastic properties of tissue, since it samples the complete wave field rather than a single transducer point.
  • The method is inherently restricted to repeatable, pump-synchronized events; applying it to single-shot or non-repeatable dynamics would require a parallel detector array or compressed-sensing of the probe beam.
  • The DC-normalization step used for brain tissue suggests that quantitative comparison across heterogeneous samples requires careful correction for probe attenuation, which could be validated on phantoms with known optical scattering.
  • The observation of wavelength-dependent PA generation from water suggests that tuning the pump wavelength could make SOPPI a spectrally resolved probe of absorber composition in three dimensions.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 7 minor

Summary. The manuscript introduces spatial-offset pump-probe imaging (SOPPI), a method that uses a fixed 1310 nm probe beam and a scanned pump-delivery fiber to map refractive-index changes caused by photoacoustic (PA) pressure waves and photothermal (PT) temperature fields. The authors demonstrate simultaneous PA and PT imaging of a candle-soot/PDMS fiber emitter, wavelength-dependent PA generation from water using a tapered fiber, PA/PT propagation through brain tissue and across a mouse skull, and a virtual-transducer-array photoacoustic computed tomography (SOPPI-PACT) reconstruction of a zebrafish larva. The headline specifications are 5.6 ns temporal resolution, 6.1 μm spatial resolution, 65 MHz detection bandwidth, and a 9.9 Pa noise-equivalent pressure.

Significance. If the claims hold, SOPPI is a significant platform: it is the first single system to image PA and PT fields simultaneously with optical resolution, broad detection bandwidth, and the ability to probe inside scattering samples. The paper has clear strengths: the pressure calibration against a commercial hydrophone is linear over a wide energy range (R^2 > 0.998 for both channels), the PT/PA decomposition is physically motivated, and the W-DAS PACT reconstruction uses a fixed sound speed and geometry-derived weights rather than fitted parameters. The zebrafish reconstruction is verified against anatomical features. However, the advertised 9.9 Pa NEP is obtained under 400-fold signal averaging, whereas the imaging demonstrations use single pulses per pixel; the quantitative tissue-transmission percentages rest on single measurements without uncertainty or through-tissue calibration. These points must be addressed before the headline quantitative claims are accepted.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract, Results (Figure S1), Materials and Methods (SOPPI system)] The abstract and main text advertise a sensitivity of 9.9 Pa noise-equivalent pressure, but Figure S1 states that this value is obtained with '400 times averaged' traces, while the Methods state that 'Each pixel corresponds to a single pump pulse.' The imaging demonstrations in Figures 2–5 therefore operate at approximately 20-fold higher noise, i.e., a single-pulse NEP of roughly 200 Pa rather than 9.9 Pa. Because sensitivity is one of the four headline specifications and is used to claim a two-order-of-magnitude advantage over hydrophones, the paper must either report the single-pulse NEP or explicitly qualify the 9.9 Pa value as an averaged detection limit and adjust the abstract and main-text claims accordingly. This is not an invalidation of the method, but it is a load-bearing quantitative claim that is not currently supported by the data presented.
  2. [Results, Figure 1e-f; Results, Figure 4d-e and Figure 4g] The absolute pressure calibration is based on a single hydrophone comparison at a fixed 300 μm distance in water. The quantitative statements in Figure 4d-e ('more than 99% of the ultrasound energy delivered into the brain tissue') and Figure 4g ('around 21% of ultrasound was able to penetrate the skull') assume that the SOPPI signal remains a faithful pressure proxy after propagation through brain tissue and skull. Scattering, absorption, and acoustic refraction can alter the probe beam independently of the PA/PT amplitude, and the manuscript reports no replicate measurements, no error bars, and no through-tissue calibration for these percentages. Repeating the transmission measurements and, ideally, calibrating through a tissue phantom or an independent acoustic measurement would make these central quantitative claims reproducible.
minor comments (7)
  1. [Abstract and Teaser] The abstract contains an ungrammatical phrase ('how the wave interacting with a mouse skull and brain slices') and the Teaser says 'photothermal and photothermal fields'; the latter should be 'photoacoustic and photothermal fields.'
  2. [Results, Figure S1 and main text] The NEP is given as 9.8 Pa in the main text and 9.89 Pa in Figure S1; please harmonize the values and specify the averaging condition in the main text as well as in the figure caption.
  3. [Results, Figure 1e; Discussion] The manuscript claims a 65 MHz detection bandwidth, but the Methods list a 100 MHz amplifier and a 180 MSa/s digitizer; please state which component limits the bandwidth to 65 MHz and how this value was determined.
  4. [Results, Figure 3d] Reference 44 appears to concern the absorption spectra of immersion oils, not water; please cite a direct water absorption spectrum for the comparison in Figure 3d.
  5. [Results, Figure 4e and Figure 4g] The '>99%' and '~21%' transmission values are reported without error bars or replicate counts; a single scan does not justify this precision, and the number of independent measurements should be stated.
  6. [Results, Figure S2 and Discussion] The 'acousto-thermal effect' mentioned in the Discussion is inferred from secondary heating in Figure S2; please define this term quantitatively (e.g., the estimated PA-to-heat conversion efficiency) so that it is not confused with established acoustothermal effects in the literature.
  7. [Results, Figure 5d] The claim of 26 μm spatial resolution in the SOPPI-PACT reconstruction should be supported by a line profile or a resolution phantom; as written, it is unclear whether the value reflects the system resolution or the intrinsic size of the dorsal-stripe pigment features.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: SOPPI's claims are anchored to external hydrophone calibration, literature water absorption spectra, and fixed-speed geometric reconstruction, not to fitted inputs or self-citation chains.

full rationale

I find no circular step in the paper's derivation chain. The pressure calibration is external: SOPPI signals are compared with a commercial hydrophone at a fixed 300-micron distance and a linear energy scan (Figure 1e-f), so the 9.8 Pa NEP is a calibrated detection limit rather than a parameter fitted to the imaging targets. The wavelength-dependent photoacoustic amplitudes are validated against a literature absorption spectrum of water (Figure 3d), and the brain/skull transmission percentages are checked against an independent acoustic-impedance calculation in the Supplementary Text. The SOPPI-PACT reconstruction uses the standard weighted delay-and-sum algorithm with a fixed sound speed (1480 m/s) and a geometry-derived weight (cos^2(theta)/y), with no parameter fitted to the zebrafish image; the transmission image is used only as an overlay reference, not as reconstruction input. Self-citations (refs 11, 12, 17-21, 35) appear as background on photoacoustic/photothermal emitters and prior pump-probe microscopy; none is invoked as a uniqueness theorem or as the proof of the central new capability, so they are not load-bearing. I therefore set score 0 with no circular steps. Separately, and not as a circularity claim, the headline 9.9 Pa NEP is quoted from 400-times-averaged data (Figure S1: '400 times averaged. NEP = 9.89 Pa') while the Methods state that in imaging 'Each pixel corresponds to a single pump pulse'; this is a statistical-reporting caution about per-pixel sensitivity in the imaging demonstrations, not a circular derivation.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on standard domain assumptions about refractive-index probing, frequency separation, and acoustic propagation. No free parameters were fitted to data and no new entities are postulated; the only external calibration is a hydrophone sensitivity conversion.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption The refractive-index modulation detected by the 1310 nm probe beam is a linear, quantitative proxy for local pressure (PA) and temperature (PT) changes.
    Invoked throughout the Results to convert measured intensity modulation into pressure and thermal maps; only one absolute hydrophone calibration at a fixed distance is shown (Figure 1e-f).
  • domain assumption PA and PT signals are cleanly separable by frequency filtering at 500 kHz.
    Used to decompose raw traces into bipolar PA and slowly decaying PT components (Figure 1c); assumes no spectral overlap and no filter-induced distortion of amplitudes.
  • domain assumption For PACT reconstruction, ultrasound travels as spherical waves with a uniform speed c = 1480 m/s in water.
    The W-DAS formula in the Supplementary Text uses this constant sound speed and ignores heterogeneity, refraction, and dispersion in the zebrafish sample.
  • domain assumption Acoustic transmission at the water/brain boundary can be computed from the planar-wave impedance formula Z = rho * c with literature values for density and sound speed.
    Supplementary calculation obtains 0.36% reflection and more than 99% energy delivery into brain tissue; assumes planar waves at normal incidence and ignores skull curvature and mode conversion in the skull experiment.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spatial-offset pump-probe imaging of nonradiative dynamics at optical resolution." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/K7JTEBTD

@misc{pith2026250203384,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spatial-offset pump-probe imaging of nonradiative dynamics at optical resolution},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/K7JTEBTD}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.03384}
}
read the original abstract

Nonradiative photothermal (PT) and photoacoustic (PA) processes have found widespread applications in imaging, stimulation, and therapy. Mapping the generation and propagation of PA and PT waves with resolution is important to elucidate how these fields interact with biological systems. To this end, we introduce spatial offset pump-probe imaging (SOPPI). By spatially offsetting the pump beam and the probe beam, SOPPI can image simultaneously PA and PT wave propagation with nanosecond temporal resolution, micrometer spatial resolution, 65 MHz detection bandwidth, and a sensitivity of 9.9 Pa noise equivalent pressure. We first map the PA and PT evolution from a fiber emitter, and how the wave interacting with a mouse skull and brain slices. SOPPI imaging of PA waves from a tapered fiber with water as an absorber shows a wavelength-dependent generation, evanescent wave generated PA, and back-propagated acoustic Mach Cone. At last, a SOPPI-PACT is developed to reconstruct the pigment distribution inside a zebrafish larva with high precision and signal-to-noise ratio.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.03384 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Figure1. SOPPI is a spatially offset pump [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 5
Figure 5. Photoacoustic computed tomography of a zebrafish using SOPPI. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_5.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

46 extracted references · 46 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Manohar, D

    S. Manohar, D. Razansky, Photoacoustics: a historical review. Advances in Optics and Photonics 8, 586-617 (2016)

    work page 2016

  2. [2]

    Hajireza, W

    P. Hajireza, W. Shi, K. Bell, R. J. Paproski, R. J. Zemp, Non-interferometric photoacoustic remote sensing microscopy. Light Sci Appl 6, e16278 (2017)

    work page 2017

  3. [3]

    Palzer, Photoacoustic-Based Gas Sensing: A Review

    S. Palzer, Photoacoustic-Based Gas Sensing: A Review. Sensors 20, 10.3390/s20092745 (2020)

    work page doi:10.3390/s20092745 2020

  4. [4]

    A. C. Tam, Applications of photoacoustic sensing techniques. Reviews of Modern Physics 58, 381-431 (1986)

    work page 1986

  5. [5]

    A. C. Tam, B. Sullivan, Remote sensing applications of pulsed photothermal radiometry. Applied Physics Letters 43, 333-335 (1983)

    work page 1983

  6. [6]

    W. Jin, Y. Cao, F. Yang, H. L. Ho, Ultra-sensitive all-fibre photothermal spectroscopy with large dynamic range. Nature Communications 6, 6767 (2015)

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    M. Xu, L. V. Wang, Photoacoustic imaging in biomedicine. Review of Scientific Instruments 77, (2006)

    work page 2006

  8. [8]

    L. V. Wang, J. Yao, A practical guide to photoacoustic tomography in the life sciences. Nature Methods 13, 627-638 (2016)

    work page 2016

Show all 46 references
  1. [9]

    J. Yao, L. V. Wang, Photoacoustic microscopy. Laser & Photonics Reviews 7, 758-778 (2013)

    2013

  2. [10]

    Chien, M

    M.-H. Chien, M. Brameshuber, B. K. Rossboth, G. J. Schütz, S. Schmid, Single-molecule optical absorption imaging by nanomechanical photothermal sensing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 115, 11150-11155 (2018)

    2018

  3. [11]

    H. Ni, Y. Yuan, M. Li, Y. Zhu, X. Ge, J. Yin, C. P. Dessai, L. Wang, J.-X. Cheng, Millimetre-deep micrometre-resolution vibrational imaging by shortwave infrared photothermal microscopy. Nature Photonics, 9, 944-951 (2024)

    2024

  4. [12]

    Y. Yuan, G. Zhang, Y. Chen, H. Ni, M. Li, M. Sturek, J.-X. Cheng, A high-sensitivity high-resolution intravascular photoacoustic catheter through mode cleaning in a graded- index fiber. Photoacoustics 29, 100451 (2023)

    2023

  5. [13]

    H. S. Han, K. Y. Choi, Advances in Nanomaterial-Mediated Photothermal Cancer Therapies: Toward Clinical Applications. Biomedicines 9, 305 (2021)

    2021

  6. [14]

    D. Zhi, T. Yang, J. O'Hagan, S. Zhang, R. F. Donnelly, Photothermal therapy. Journal of Controlled Release 325, 52-71 (2020)

    2020

  7. [15]

    K. Yang, S. Zhao, B. Li, B. Wang, M. Lan, X. Song, Low temperature photothermal therapy: Advances and perspectives. Coordination Chemistry Reviews 454, 214330 (2022)

    2022

  8. [16]

    A. R. Rastinehad, H. Anastos, E. Wajswol, J. S. Winoker, J. P. Sfakianos, S. K. Doppalapudi, M. R. Carrick, C. J. Knauer, B. Taouli, S. C. Lewis, A. K. Tewari, J. A. Schwartz, S. E. Canfield, A. K. George, J. L. West, N. J. Halas, Gold nanoshell-localized photothermal ablation...

    2019

  9. [17]

    G. Chen, L. Shi, L. Lan, R. Wang, Y. Li, Z. Du, M. Hyman, J. X. Cheng, C. Yang, High- precision neural stimulation by a highly efficient candle soot fiber optoacoustic emitter. Front Neurosci 16, 1005810 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    G. Chen, F. Y. Yu, L. L. Shi, C. Marar, Z. Y. Du, D. C. Jia, J. X. Cheng, C. Yang, High- Precision Photoacoustic Neural Modulation Uses a Non-Thermal Mechanism. Adv Sci, e2403205 (2024)

    2024

  11. [19]

    Z. Du, M. Li, G. Chen, M. Xiang, D. Jia, J. X. Cheng, C. Yang, Mid-Infrared Photoacoustic Stimulation of Neurons through Vibrational Excitation in Polydimethylsiloxane. Adv Sci (Weinh) 11, e2405677 (2024)

    2024

  12. [20]

    Jiang, H

    Y. Jiang, H. J. Lee, L. Lan, H. A. Tseng, C. Yang, H. Y. Man, X. Han, J. X. Cheng, Optoacoustic brain stimulation at submillimeter spatial precision. Nat Commun 11, 881 (2020)

    2020

  13. [21]

    L. Shi, Y. Jiang, F. R. Fernandez, G. Chen, L. Lan, H. Y. Man, J. A. White, J. X. Cheng, C. Yang, Non-genetic photoacoustic stimulation of single neurons by a tapered fiber optoacoustic emitter. Light Sci Appl 10, 143 (2021)

    2021

  14. [22]

    J. L. Carvalho-de-Souza, B. I. Pinto, D. R. Pepperberg, F. Bezanilla, Optocapacitive Generation of Action Potentials by Microsecond Laser Pulses of Nanojoule Energy. Biophys J 114, 283-288 (2018)

    2018

  15. [23]

    M. G. Shapiro, K. Homma, S. Villarreal, C. P. Richter, F. Bezanilla, Infrared light excites cells by changing their electrical capacitance. Nat Commun 3, 736 (2012)

    2012

  16. [24]

    Wells, C

    J. Wells, C. Kao, K. Mariappan, J. Albea, E. D. Jansen, P. Konrad, A. Mahadevan-Jansen, Optical stimulation of neural tissue in vivo. Opt Lett 30, 504-506 (2005)

    2005

  17. [25]

    Kuang, Q

    X. Kuang, Q. Rong, S. Belal, T. Vu, A. M. López López, N. Wang, M. O. Arıcan, C. E. Garciamendez-Mijares, M. Chen, J. Yao, Y. S. Zhang, Self-enhancing sono-inks enable deep-penetration acoustic volumetric printing. Science 382, 1148-1155 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    H. C. Hsu, L. Li, J. Yao, T. T. W. Wong, J. Shi, R. Chen, Q. Zhou, L. Wang, Dual-axis illumination for virtually augmenting the detection view of optical-resolution photoacoustic microscopy. J Biomed Opt 23, 1-7 (2018)

    2018

  19. [27]

    L. Wang, G. Li, J. Xia, L. V. Wang, Ultrasonic-heating-encoded photoacoustic tomography with virtually augmented detection view. Optica 2, 307-312 (2015)

    2015

  20. [28]

    Z. Wang, Q. Nie, H. Sun, Q. Wang, S. Borri, P. De Natale, W. Ren, Cavity-enhanced photoacoustic dual-comb spectroscopy. Light Sci Appl 13, 11 (2024)

    2024

  21. [29]

    H. Li, B. Dong, Z. Zhang, H. F. Zhang, C. Sun, A transparent broadband ultrasonic detector based on an optical micro-ring resonator for photoacoustic microscopy. Scientific Reports 4, 4496 (2014)

    2014

  22. [30]

    B. Dong, H. Li, Z. Zhang, K. Zhang, S. Chen, C. Sun, H. F. Zhang, Isometric multimodal photoacoustic microscopy based on optically transparent micro-ring ultrasonic detection. Optica 2, 169-176 (2015)

    2015

  23. [31]

    Bagavathiappan, B

    S. Bagavathiappan, B. B. Lahiri, T. Saravanan, J. Philip, T. Jayakumar, Infrared thermography for condition monitoring – A review. Infrared Physics & Technology 60, 35-55 (2013)

    2013

  24. [32]

    A. G. Doukas, A. D. Zweig, J. K. Frisoli, R. Birngruber, T. F. Deutsch, Non-invasive determination of shock wave pressure generated by optical breakdown. Applied Physics B 53, 237-245 (1991)

    1991

  25. [33]

    Sontag, A

    H. Sontag, A. C. Tam, Optical monitoring of photoacoustic pulse propagation in silicon wafers. Applied Physics Letters 46, 725-727 (1985)

    1985

  26. [34]

    W. B. Jackson, N. M. Amer, A. C. Boccara, D. Fournier, Photothermal deflection spectroscopy and detection. Appl Opt 20, 1333-1344 (1981)

    1981

  27. [35]

    H. Ni, Y. Yuan, M. Li, Y. Zhu, X. Ge, J. Yin, C. P. Dessai, L. Wang, J.-X. Cheng, Millimetre-deep micrometre-resolution vibrational imaging by shortwave infrared photothermal microscopy. Nature Photonics 18, 944-951 (2024)

    2024

  28. [36]

    Veysset, C

    D. Veysset, C. A. A. capital Em, T. Pezeril, S. Kooi, K. A. Nelson, Interferometric analysis of laser-driven cylindrically focusing shock waves in a thin liquid layer. Sci Rep 6, 24 (2016)

    2016

  29. [37]

    Pezeril, G

    T. Pezeril, G. Saini, D. Veysset, S. Kooi, P. Fidkowski, R. Radovitzky, K. A. Nelson, Direct visualization of laser-driven focusing shock waves. Phys Rev Lett 106, 214503 (2011)

    2011

  30. [38]

    T. Kim, J. Liang, L. Zhu, L. V. Wang, Picosecond-resolution phase-sensitive imaging of transparent objects in a single shot. Science Advances 6, eaay6200

  31. [39]

    G. R. Harris, S. M. Howard, A. M. Hurrell, P. A. Lewin, M. E. Schafer, K. A. Wear, V. Wilkens, B. Zeqiri, Hydrophone Measurements for Biomedical Ultrasound Applications: A Review. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 70, 85-100 (2023)

    2023

  32. [40]

    J. Yao, L. V. Wang, Sensitivity of photoacoustic microscopy. Photoacoustics 2, 87-101 (2014)

    2014

  33. [41]

    J. Pan, Q. Li, Y. Feng, R. Zhong, Z. Fu, S. Yang, W. Sun, B. Zhang, Q. Sui, J. Chen, Y. Shen, Z. Li, Parallel interrogation of the chalcogenide-based micro-ring sensor array for photoacoustic tomography. Nat Commun 14, 3250 (2023)

    2023

  34. [42]

    Y. Wang, R. Garg, D. Cohen-Karni, T. Cohen-Karni, Neural modulation with photothermally active nanomaterials. Nat Rev Bioeng 1, 193-207 (2023)

    2023

  35. [43]

    Zhang, J

    X. Zhang, J. R. Fincke, C. M. Wynn, M. R. Johnson, R. W. Haupt, B. W. Anthony, Full noncontact laser ultrasound: first human data. Light Sci Appl 8, 119 (2019)

    2019

  36. [44]

    K. Wang, W. Wen, Y. Wang, K. Wang, J. He, J. Wang, P. Zhai, Y. Yang, P. Qiu, Order- of-magnitude multiphoton signal enhancement based on characterization of absorption spectra of immersion oils at the 1700-nm window. Opt Express 25, 5909-5916 (2017)

    2017

  37. [45]

    T. Lee, H. W. Baac, Q. Li, L. J. Guo, Efficient Photoacoustic Conversion in Optical Nanomaterials and Composites. Advanced Optical Materials 6, 1800419 (2018)

    2018

  38. [46]

    #$%=1𝑔𝑚𝑙⁄×1480𝑚𝑠⁄=14.8 𝑀𝑅𝑦 𝑍&%

    Y. Cao, W. Jin, L. H. Ho, Z. Liu, Evanescent-wave photoacoustic spectroscopy with optical micro/nano fibers. Optics Letters 37, 214-6 (2012). 1 Supplementary Materials for Spatial offset pump-probe imaging of nonradiative dynamics at optical resolution Guo Chen et al. *Corresp...

    2012

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.