Pith. sign in

REVIEW 4 major objections 5 minor 29 references

Retina electronic paper with video-rate-tunable 45000 pixels per inch

T0 review · 4 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-09 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper proposes a reflective display, Retina E-paper, whose WO3 meta-pixels reach ~560 nm (over 45,000 PPI) and switch fast enough for 25 Hz video.

desk verdict Static >45,000 PPI full-color reflective meta-pixel imaging is real and new, but the headline video-rate claim is extrapolated from 350-micron pads, not demonstrated on the 560-nm pixels. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.03580 v1 pith:FQYXFGDY submitted 2025-02-05 cs.HC physics.optics

Ade Satria Saloka Santosa , Yu-Wei Chang , Andreas B. Dahlin , Lars Osterlund , Giovanni Volpe , Kunli Xiong This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.HCphysics.optics
keywords electrochromicdisplaymeta-pixelretinaelectronicpaperstructuralcolorMiescatteringreflectivevideo-rateswitchingtungstentrioxide
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper proposes a reflective display technology, Retina E-paper, built from electrochromic WO3 nanodiscs on a mirror, with electrically tunable meta-pixels down to about 560 nanometers—more than 45,000 pixels per inch. Because the pixels use ambient light rather than emitting their own, their brightness does not collapse as they shrink, and the paper reports roughly 80 percent reflectance and 50 percent optical contrast at these sizes. The authors report switching to 95 percent of full optical contrast in 40 milliseconds in their lateral-electrode test pads, which they take to support 25-hertz video, and they demonstrate full-color images by arranging red, green, and blue subpixels with tuned spacings. If these claims hold, a display of this kind could match one pixel to one retinal photoreceptor when placed at the pupil, which the paper identifies as the resolution limit of human vision and a path to an ultimate virtual-reality display.

What carries the argument

The central object is a WO3 nanodisc meta-pixel: a subwavelength disc of tungsten trioxide, a high-refractive-index electrochromic semiconductor, sitting on a highly reflective metal substrate. Color is generated by Mie scattering, the resonant scattering of visible light by a particle comparable in size to the wavelength, and by grating modes, the diffractive coupling between repeated nanodiscs; tuning the disc diameter (D) and spacing (W) selects the reflected color, while tuning the spacing between RGB subpixels (T) makes the intermediate regions produce cyan, magenta, and yellow. The electrochromic property does the dynamic work: applying a voltage drives lithium ions into the WO3, lowering its refractive index and raising its extinction coefficient, which switches the pixel from bright to dark. The mechanism that carries the video claim is the lateral electrode geometry with a 500 nm working-to-counter-electrode gap plus short voltage pulses, which concentrates the local electric field and gives 40 ms switching to 95 percent contrast on 350-micrometer pads.

What would settle it

Measure the optical step response of an individual ~560 nm meta-pixel, or a small cluster, in the electrolyte with the 500 nm electrode gap, applying ±4 V pulses and sampling at 25 Hz. If 95 percent contrast is not reached within 40 ms, or if adjacent pixels fail to switch independently, the video-rate claim fails.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the central discovery is that electrochromic meta-pixels made of WO3 nanodiscs on a reflective Al/Pt substrate can be scaled to ~560 nm while remaining individually addressable in color and reflectance. The reflected color is set by the nanodisc diameter and spacing through Mie scattering and grating modes, and the electrochromic reaction—lithium-ion insertion in WO3 under an applied voltage—changes the material's refractive index and extinction coefficient, toggling each pixel between a bright state and a dark state. The paper reports 95 percent of full optical-contrast modulation within 40 ms on 350-micrometer pads using a 500 nm gap between working and counter electrodes and short voltage pulses, and it renders 'The Kiss' with cyan, magenta, and yellow meta-pixels at 2100 × 4000 resolution over a 1.9 × 1.4 mm area. Its claimed consequence is that reflective displays can reach the human eye's resolution limit with video-rate refresh.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the 40 ms switching time measured on 350-micrometer pixel pads also holds for individual ~560 nm meta-pixels in electrolyte and in the presence of adjacent pixels; the paper does not report a switching measurement at the nanoscale.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Retina E-paper can be fabricated with pixels small enough to exceed 45,000 PPI, beyond the ~40,000 PPI the paper estimates as the retina's one-to-one pixel limit.
  • Full-color images can be produced by additive RGB meta-pixel arrangements even at nanoscale spacing, because tuned subpixel gaps generate CMY in the intermediate regions.
  • Electrochromic metal-oxide meta-pixels switch fast enough for 25 Hz video, more than ten times faster than previously reported WO3-based electrochromic devices.
  • A working display panel would keep roughly 80 percent reflectance and 50 percent optical contrast regardless of pixel size, since reflection depends on nanoscale material polarization rather than emitter area.
  • With a thin-film-transistor backplane to address each pixel independently, a 1.9 mm by 1.4 mm panel could show 4000 by 2100 pixels, roughly 2.8 times the resolution of a smartphone screen in about 1/4000 the area.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's one-to-one pixel-to-photoreceptor mapping is presented as a consequence of matching display size to pupil diameter; what that would require in an actual headset—placing the display at the pupil plane and tracking the eye—is left implicit, not solved here.
  • A direct test of the video claim would be switching individual ~560 nm meta-pixels rather than 350-micrometer pads; smaller ion paths might make nanoscale pixels faster, but inter-pixel electrochemical crosstalk could make them slower.
  • The static pixel-density claim is independent of the video claim: even without the 40 ms switching result, the SEM and microscope images of 400-460 nm color meta-pixels stand on their own.
  • The technology's practical path depends on an ultrahigh-density thin-film-transistor backplane, which the paper notes is required for independent pixel control and which does not yet exist at this pitch.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

4 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper reports an electrochromic metasurface display based on WO3 nanodiscs on a reflective Pt/Al substrate, claiming electrically tunable meta-pixels down to ~560 nm (>45,000 PPI), static full-color imaging via RGB and CMY subpixel arrangements, video-rate switching at 25 Hz, high reflectance (~80%), and optical contrast (~50%). The authors demonstrate a 2100 x 4000 pixel reproduction of "The Kiss" and characterize electrochemical switching on 350-micrometer electrode pads. They explicitly note that a TFT array would be required for independent pixel control, which is not implemented.

Significance. If the static ultrahigh-resolution result is considered on its own, the paper is a notable experimental advance: it shows full-color reflective metasurface pixels at sub-micrometer dimensions and reversible electrochemical modulation of those structures. The 40 ms switching measured on macroscopic pads and the high normalized reflectance are also interesting. However, the headline video-rate display claim is not supported by the present experiments, and the quantitative reflectance and contrast values are not established with absolute calibration or uncertainty estimates. The conceptual proposal for a retina-scale display is compelling, but the evidence does not yet support the claims as stated.

major comments (4)
  1. [Fig. 3A, Fig. 3C, and Abstract] The entire video-rate claim rests on switching measurements performed on 350-micrometer RGB pixel pads, not on the ~560-nm meta-pixels or individual subpixels. The 40 ms to 95% contrast is an ensemble measurement over a macroscopic electrode area; no time-resolved reflectance measurement of a single 560-nm meta-pixel is presented. Movie S1 and Fig. 4D show global ON/OFF modulation of large patterned areas, not per-pixel video content. Thus "supports video display (25 Hz)" is an extrapolation that requires switching speed to be independent of pixel area, electrolyte access, and inter-pixel coupling, none of which is demonstrated. This is the central quantitative claim and needs either direct nanoscale switching measurements or a clear re-scoping of the claim.
  2. [Main text, "For the display application" paragraph] The paper states that "a TFT array should be employed to independently control the reflectance of each pixel," and Fig. 4B notes that the device does not connect to TFT arrays. Without any demonstration or quantitative analysis of nanoscale pixel addressing, the claim that this technology "supports video display" is incomplete. The static image is rendered by fixed geometry, and the dynamic demonstration does not show independently addressable pixels updating at 25 Hz. The abstract's video claim should be removed or substantially qualified until TFT integration with the nanoscale pixels is demonstrated.
  3. [Fig. 2A and "high reflectance (~80%)"] The reflectance spectra are normalized to the reflective layer, as stated in the text and figure caption, so the reported ~80% reflectance is a relative value rather than an absolute measurement against a calibrated standard. No error bars or sample-to-sample statistics are provided for reflectance, optical contrast, or switching time. The headline numbers should be reported with absolute calibration and uncertainty estimates before they can be compared quantitatively with emissive displays or commercial e-paper.
  4. [Fig. 2C, Fig. 4A, and Fig. 4E] The RGB and CMY color palettes, and the inter-subpixel spacings that generate hybrid colors, are selected by a hand-optimization procedure described as "carefully selecting RGB pixels and tuning the inter-pixel spacing." The CMY dimensions are additionally re-optimized for the electrolyte environment. The gamut comparison in Fig. 4E therefore validates the design choices rather than testing an independent prediction. The paper would be strengthened by a forward simulation from first principles, an independent parameter sweep with a defined cost function, or a validation set of pixel geometries that were not used in the optimization.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Fig. 4B caption] The caption contains a typo, "1achieves," which should read "achieves."
  2. [References] Reference 10 and reference 12 appear to be the same paper (Yang et al., Nature Communications 2020) and should be consolidated to avoid duplication.
  3. [Fig. 3A and main text] The text says "the RGB pixel size is 350 μm" in the electrochemical characterization, while earlier it describes ~560-nm meta-pixels. The relation between the 350-µm test pads and the nanoscale meta-pixel arrays should be clarified explicitly, including whether the pads contain many nanodiscs and how the measured reflectance is averaged.
  4. [Main text, switching-speed discussion] The statement that "since not all pixels undergo 100% intensity changes in a typical video frame (<10% variation per frame), the effective response time will be significantly shorter than 40 ms" is not a substitute for measuring typical frame-to-frame switching. It should be removed or supported by time-resolved measurements at partial modulation depths.
  5. [Fig. 3B and Fig. 4C] The numerical simulation validating the field concentration is shown only for a red pixel at a single wavelength (650 nm). Showing simulated spectra across the visible range for all RGB and CMY pixels would better support the claim that the electrochromic modulation mechanism applies uniformly.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity identified; the video-rate claim is an extrapolation and integration gap, not a circular reduction.

full rationale

The paper's chain is largely empirical. The target pixel pitch follows from arithmetic on an assumed retinal photoreceptor count (120 million) and pupil diameter (8 mm), giving ~650 nm / ~40,000 PPI; the authors then fabricate ~560 nm WO3 meta-pixels. The >45,000 PPI claim is corroborated by SEM and microscope images, independent of any fitted color parameter. The RGB/CMY palettes are obtained by tuning nanodisc diameter D, spacing W, and subpixel spacing T; the measured reflectance spectra and gamut maps characterize a hand-optimized device rather than test an independent prediction, but the paper does not present these as predictions derived from theory, so this is not circular. The weakest step is the 25 Hz video claim: the 40 ms switching time is measured on 350-µm RGB pads (the paper states 'the RGB pixel size is 350 μm' in Fig. 3A), not on isolated 560-nm meta-pixels, and the paper admits, 'For the display application, a TFT array should be employed to independently control the reflectance of each pixel.' That is a scaling and integration assumption, i.e., an external-validity gap, not a reduction of the conclusion to its own inputs. The lateral-electrode mechanism cites the authors' prior work (ref. 26), but it is used only as supporting explanation for a speed measured in this study; it is not load-bearing for a claim that would otherwise be identical to the citation. No equation or definition in the paper makes the pixel-density or switching result true by construction, so no circular step meets the required quotation-and-reduction evidence bar.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central display performance rests on hand-optimized geometric parameters (D, W, T) rather than a parameter-free model, and on three domain assumptions: the retina-mapping target, the transfer of switching speed from large pads to nanoscale pixels, and the color-mixing rules. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (5)
  • RGB nanodisc diameter D and spacing W (air) = R: D=220 nm, W=200 nm; G: D=260 nm, W=200 nm; B: D=260 nm, W=140 nm
    Chosen from a parameter sweep (Fig. 2A) to produce the desired red, green, and blue reflection spectra; these values set the color gamut.
  • RGB subpixel spacing T = R-G: 300 nm; B-R: 80 nm; G-B: 100 nm
    Tuned so that adjacent subpixels generate cyan, magenta, and yellow by grating coupling (Fig. 2C); failed combinations are in Fig. S2.
  • CMY nanodisc dimensions (air) = C: D=260 nm, W=160 nm; M: D=240 nm, W=100 nm; Y: D=180 nm, W=180 nm
    Optimized for subtractive color rendering of 'The Kiss' (Fig. 4A).
  • CMY/RGB dimensions in electrolyte = C: D=280 nm, W=20 nm; M: D=220 nm, W=80 nm; Y: D=220 nm, W=80 nm; RGB subpixel spacing T1=40 nm, T2=300 nm, T3=60 nm
    Re-optimized to account for the lower refractive-index contrast in electrolyte (Fig. 4C).
  • Applied voltage pulse amplitude and duration = ±4 V, 40 ms
    Chosen to drive 95% optical contrast in 40 ms (Fig. 3C-D); not scanned over a wide range, so the switching claim is tied to this operating point.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The human retina's 120 million photoreceptors and an 8 mm pupil imply an ideal pixel size of ~650 nm for one-to-one mapping.
    Used in the opening paragraph to define the 'Retina' display goal; conflates total photoreceptor count with local foveal spacing and ignores diffraction.
  • domain assumption Mie scattering and grating modes from WO3 nanodiscs produce the observed colors; at least four nanodiscs are needed per pixel.
    Underlies the pixel design and the 400-560 nm minimum pixel sizes; not proven in the text beyond a brief statement.
  • domain assumption A 500 nm gap between working and counter electrodes enhances the local electric field, and thin amorphous WO3 gives fast ion insertion.
    Adopted from the authors' prior work (refs 26, 28) to explain the 40 ms switching; not independently measured here.
  • domain assumption Switching time measured on 350-μm pixel pads applies to individual ~560 nm meta-pixels.
    Implicit in the claim that video-rate tunability at >45,000 PPI is supported; no nanoscale switching data are shown.
  • domain assumption Additive RGB and subtractive CMY color-mixing rules hold for adjacent metasurface subpixels when the spacing T is optimized.
    The design uses this to claim full-color imaging; validated only for the specific hand-picked geometries in Figs. 2C and 4A.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Retina electronic paper with video-rate-tunable 45000 pixels per inch." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/FQYXFGDY

@misc{pith2026250203580,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Retina electronic paper with video-rate-tunable 45000 pixels per inch},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/FQYXFGDY}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.03580}
}
read the original abstract

As demand for immersive experiences grows, displays are moving closer to the eye with smaller sizes and higher resolutions. However, shrinking pixel emitters reduce intensity, making them harder to perceive. Electronic Papers utilize ambient light for visibility, maintaining optical contrast regardless of pixel size, but cannot achieve high resolution. We show electrically tunable meta-pixels down to ~560 nm in size (>45,000 PPI) consisting of WO3 nanodiscs, allowing one-to-one pixel-photodetector mapping on the retina when the display size matches the pupil diameter, which we call Retina Electronic Paper. Our technology also supports video display (25 Hz), high reflectance (~80%), and optical contrast (~50%), which will help create the ultimate virtual reality display.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.03580 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. B illustrates the fundamental structure of the Retina E-paper, composed of electrochromic WO₃ metamaterials integrated with a highly reflective (Al/Pt) substrate. WO₃ is a semiconductor with a high refractive index RI (~2 to 2.4) in the visible spectrum (25) so that it enables color generation by Mie scattering. By precisely tuning the diameter (D) and spacing [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Design and characterization of WO [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. B illustrates the measured normalized reflectance modulation of RGB meta-pixels in the ON/OFF states. Since both Mie scattering and grating modes are influenced by variations in the refractive index of the surrounding environment, the optimized nanodisc dimensions for the RGB meta-pixels are: R (D = 300 nm, W = 120 nm), G (D = 280 nm, W = 80 nm), and B (D = 260 nm, W = 40 nm). A clear distinction is observed when co… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Characterization of Retina E-Paper display performance. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

29 extracted references · 26 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    W. J. Joo, M. L. Brongersma, Creating the ultimate virtual reality display. Science 377, 1377–1378 (2022). doi:10.1126/science.abq7011

    work page doi:10.1126/science.abq7011 2022

  2. [2]

    W. J. Joo, J. Kyoung, M. Esfandyarpour, S. H. Lee, H. Koo, S. Song, Y . N. Kwon, S. Ho Song, J. C. Bae, A. Jo, M. J. Kwon, S. H. Han, S. H. Kim, S. Hwang, M. L. Brongersma, Metasurface-driven OLED displays beyond 10,000 pixels per inch. Science 370 (2020). doi:10.1126/science.abc8530

    work page doi:10.1126/science.abc8530 2020

  3. [3]

    J. Shin, H. Kim, S. Sundaram, J. Jeong, B. I. Park, C. S. Chang, J. Choi, T. Kim, M. Saravanapavanantham, K. Lu, S. Kim, J. M. Suh, K. S. Kim, M. K. Song, Y . Liu, K. Qiao, J. H. Kim, Y . Kim, J. H. Kang, J. Kim, D. Lee, J. Lee, J. S. Kim, H. E. Lee, H. Yeon, H. S. Kum, S. H. Bae, V . Bulovic, K. J. Yu, K. Lee, K. Chung, Y . J. Hong, A. Ougazzaden, J. Kim...

    work page doi:10.1038/s41586-022-05612-1 2023

  4. [4]

    P. A. Kossyrev, A. Yin, S. G. Cloutier, D. A. Cardimona, D. Huang, P. M. Alsing, J. M. Xu, Electric field tuning of plasmonic response of nanodot array in liquid crystal matrix. Nano Lett 5, 1978–1981 (2005). doi:10.1021/nl0513535

    work page doi:10.1021/nl0513535 2005

  5. [5]

    H. M. Zang, C. Lin, H. Du, H. Gu, M. Parent, Y. Chen, L. Liu, Electrophoretic display comprising black, white, red, and yellow particles. J Soc Inf Disp 30, 387–394 (2022). doi:10.1002/jsid.1121

    work page doi:10.1002/jsid.1121 2022

  6. [6]

    Kumar, H

    K. Kumar, H. Duan, R. S. Hegde, S. C. W. Koh, J. N. Wei, J. K. W. Yang, Printing colour at the optical diffraction limit. Nature Nanotechnology 7, 557–561 (2012). doi:10.1038/nnano.2012.128

    work page doi:10.1038/nnano.2012.128 2012

  7. [7]

    A. I. Kuznetsov, A. E. Miroshnichenko, M. L. Brongersma, Y . S. Kivshar, B. Luk’yanchuk, Optically resonant dielectric nanostructures. Science 354 (2016). doi:10.1126/science.aag2472

    doi:10.1126/science.aag2472 2016

  8. [8]

    Proust, F

    J. Proust, F. Bedu, B. Gallas, I. Ozerov, N. Bonod, All-Dielectric Colored Metasurfaces with Silicon Mie Resonators. ACS Nano 10, 7761–7767 (2016). doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b03207

    work page doi:10.1021/acsnano.6b03207 2016

Show all 29 references
  1. [9]

    Y . Bao, Y . Yu, H. Xu, C. Guo, J. Li, S. Sun, Z. K. Zhou, C. W. Qiu, X. H. Wang, Full-colour nanoprint-hologram synchronous metasurface with arbitrary hue-saturation-brightness control. Light: Science & Applications 8, 1–10 (2019). doi:10.1038/s41377-019-0206-2

    2019 doi

  2. [11]

    Zheng, H

    G. Zheng, H. Mühlenbernd, M. Kenney, G. Li, T. Zentgraf, S. Zhang, Metasurface holograms reaching 80% efficiency. Nature Nanotechnology 10, 308–312 (2015). doi:10.1038/nnano.2015.2

    2015 doi

  3. [12]

    W. Yang, S. Xiao, Q. Song, Y . Liu, Y . Wu, S. Wang, J. Yu, J. Han, D. P. Tsai, All-dielectric metasurface for high-performance structural color. Nature Communications 11, 1–8 (2020). doi:10.1038/s41467-020-15773-0

    2020 doi

  4. [13]

    Vynck, R

    K. Vynck, R. Pacanowski, A. Agreda, A. Dufay, X. Granier, P. Lalanne, The visual appearances of disordered optical metasurfaces. Nature Materials 21, 1035–1041 (2022). doi:10.1038/s41563-022-01255-9

    2022 doi

  5. [14]

    M. Song, L. Feng, P. Huo, M. Liu, C. Huang, F. Yan, Y . qing Lu, T. Xu, Versatile full-colour nanopainting enabled by a pixelated plasmonic metasurface. Nat Nanotechnol 18, 71–78 (2023). doi:10.1038/S41565-022-01256-4

    2023 doi

  6. [15]

    Y . Kim, C. W. Moon, I. S. Kim, J. K. Hyun, Active modulation of reflective structural colors. Chemical Communications 58, 12014–12034 (2022). doi:10.1039/d2cc04153g

    2022 doi

  7. [16]

    Okamoto, K

    K. Okamoto, K. Okura, P. Wang, S. Ryuzaki, K. Tamada, Flexibly tunable surface plasmon resonance by strong mode coupling using a random metal nanohemisphere on mirror. Nanophotonics 9, 3409–3418 (2020). doi:10.1515/nanoph-2020-0118

    2020 doi

  8. [17]

    X. Duan, S. Kamin, N. Liu, Dynamic plasmonic colour display. Nature Communications 8, 1–9 (2017). doi:10.1038/ncomms14606

    2017 doi

  9. [18]

    Xiong, G

    K. Xiong, G. Emilsson, A. Maziz, X. Yang, L. Shao, E. W. H. Jager, A. B. Dahlin, Plasmonic Metasurfaces with Conjugated Polymers for Flexible Electronic Paper in Color. Advanced Materials 28, 9956–9960 (2016). doi:10.1002/adma.201603358

    2016 doi

  10. [19]

    Xiong, O

    K. Xiong, O. Olsson, S. Rossi, G. Wang, M. P. Jonsson, A. Dahlin, J. J. Baumberg, Video- Rate Switching of High-Reflectivity Hybrid Cavities Spanning All Primary Colors. Advanced Materials 35, 2302028 (2023). doi:10.1002/adma.202302028

    2023 doi

  11. [20]

    Gugole, O

    M. Gugole, O. Olsson, V . K. Gupta, R. Bordes, E. Ahlberg, A. Martinelli, A. Dahlin, Comparison of Electrodeposited and Sputtered Tungsten Trioxide Films for Inorganic Electrochromic Nanostructures. ACS Applied Optical Materials 1, 558–568 (2023). doi:10.1021/acsaom.2c00133

    2023 doi

  12. [21]

    C. W. Moon, Y . Kim, J. K. Hyun, Active electrochemical high-contrast gratings as on/off switchable and color tunable pixels. Nature Communications 13, 1–8 (2022). doi:10.1038/s41467-022-31083-z

    2022 doi

  13. [22]

    Xiong, D

    K. Xiong, D. Tordera, G. Emilsson, O. Olsson, U. Linderhed, M. P. Jonsson, A. B. Dahlin, Switchable Plasmonic Metasurfaces with High Chromaticity Containing only Abundant Metals. Nano Lett 17, 7033–7039 (2017). doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b03665

    2017 doi

  14. [23]

    Xiong, D

    K. Xiong, D. Tordera, M. P. Jonsson, A. B. Dahlin, Active control of plasmonic colors: emerging display technologies. Reports on Progress in Physics 82, 024501 (2019). doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aaf844

    2019 doi

  15. [24]

    J. Guo, H. Jia, Z. Shao, P. Jin, X. Cao, Fast-Switching WO3-Based Electrochromic Devices: Design, Fabrication, and Applications. Acc Mater Res 4, 438–447 (2023). doi:10.1021/accountsmr.2c00217

    2023 doi

  16. [25]

    M. B. Johansson, G. Baldissera, I. Valyukh, C. Persson, H. Arwin, G. A. Niklasson, L. Österlund, Electronic and optical properties of nanocrystalline WO3 thin films studied by optical spectroscopy and density functional calculations. Journal of Physics Condensed Matter 25 (201...

    2013 doi

  17. [26]

    Xiong, O

    K. Xiong, O. Olsson, J. Svirelis, C. Palasingh, J. Baumberg, A. Dahlin, Video Speed Switching of Plasmonic Structural Colors with High Contrast and Superior Lifetime. Advanced Materials 33, 2103217 (2021). doi:10.1002/adma.202103217

    2021 doi

  18. [27]

    Wen-Cheun Au, K

    B. Wen-Cheun Au, K. Y . Chan, D. Knipp, Effect of film thickness on electrochromic performance of sol-gel deposited tungsten oxide (WO3). Opt Mater (Amst) 94, 387–392 (2019). doi:10.1016/j.optmat.2019.05.051

    2019 doi

  19. [28]

    Bessinger, K

    D. Bessinger, K. Muggli, M. Beetz, F. Auras, T. Bein, Fast-Switching Vis-IR Electrochromic Covalent Organic Frameworks. J Am Chem Soc 143, 7351–7357 (2021). doi:10.1021/jacs.0c12392

    2021 doi

  20. [29]

    Gugole, O

    M. Gugole, O. Olsson, S. Rossi, M. P. Jonsson, A. Dahlin, Electrochromic Inorganic Nanostructures with High Chromaticity and Superior Brightness. Nano Lett 21, 4343–4350 (2021). doi:10.1021/acs.nanolett.1c00904

    2021 doi

  21. [30]

    T. Qiu, Q. An, J. Wang, J. Wang, C. W. Qiu, S. Li, H. Lv, M. Cai, J. Wang, L. Cong, S. Qu, Vision-driven metasurfaces for perception enhancement. Nature Communications 15, 1–12 (2024). doi:10.1038/s41467-024-45296-x

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 9, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.