Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 47 references

Pressure suppresses the density wave order in kagome metal LuNb$_6$Sn$_6$

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Pressure suppresses the density wave transition in kagome metal LuNb6Sn6, with the 68 K order disappearing near 1.9 GPa.

desk verdict A clean, honest pressure-transport study that confirms a prediction and maps the DW phase boundary, but the rattling-mechanism claim rests on transport alone. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.04197 v2 pith:V62H5PPC submitted 2025-02-06 cond-mat.str-el

William R. Meier , David E. Graf , Brenden R. Ortiz , Shirin Mozaffari , David Mandrus This is my paper · ORCID
classification cond-mat.str-el
keywords kagomemetaldensitywaveLuNb6Sn6rattlingchainhighpressurechargestructuralinstabilitytransport
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

LuNb6Sn6, a kagome metal built from a rigid Nb-Sn framework with under-filled Lu-Sn chains, develops a density wave at about 68 K. This paper reports resistance measurements under hydrostatic pressure up to 2.26 GPa showing that this transition is smoothly suppressed and disappears around 1.9 GPa, with no superconductivity appearing. The result is presented as a confirmation of a prediction from the rattling-chain model, in which the density wave is driven not by Fermi-surface nesting but by loose atomic chains rattling in oversized cages. If the interpretation is right, it strengthens the case that steric under-filling, rather than electronic structure alone, controls structural instabilities in this family of kagome metals.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the rattling-chain model for HfFe6Ge6-type AM6X6 kagome metals. The idea is that a small A-site atom (scandium or lutetium) sits in an oversized M-X scaffolding, so the A-X-X chains are under-filled and can rattle; these fluctuations, rather than conventional Fermi-surface nesting, drive the Sn-Sn bond modulations that define the density wave. In this paper the mechanism is probed with pressure as the tuning knob, and the transition is located by tracking the maximum and minimum of $dR/dT$; the pressure cell is calibrated with a ruby chip and cross-checked against the known pressure dependence of tin's superconducting transition.

What would settle it

Measure the crystal structure of LuNb6Sn6 by x-ray or neutron diffraction at pressures above 2 GPa and temperatures below 10 K: if the Sn-Sn bond modulation and the static displacements that define the density wave are still present even though the resistance anomaly is gone, the rattling-chain mechanism is not what pressure suppresses.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central discovery is that the density wave in LuNb6Sn6 can be switched off by pressure alone. Temperature-dependent resistance measured on cooling shows the sharp drop near 64–68 K at ambient pressure transform into a cusp and then a broad step as pressure rises, and the extracted transition temperature falls smoothly to zero by roughly 1.9 GPa. Because the resistance feature evolves continuously and disappears without a superconducting dome, the authors read the data as direct support for their earlier prediction and for the rattling-chain origin of the instability. They argue that compressing the Nb-Sn scaffolding removes the extra space that lets Lu-Sn-Sn chains rattle and displace, thereby inhibiting the Sn-Sn bond modulation that constitutes the density wave; they acknowledge that electronic structure changes under pressure could also disfavor the order, but consider them less likely given evidence that Fermi-surface nesting is not the primary driver in ScV6Sn6.

Load-bearing premise

The claim depends on the assumption that compressing the Nb-Sn framework removes the extra space and thus blocks the atomic displacements, rather than pressure altering the electronic structure enough to kill the density wave on its own.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the suppression is steric, then other HfFe6Ge6-type compounds with under-filled channels should show density waves that can be tuned or eliminated by modest pressures, with the critical pressure set by framework compressibility.
  • The roughly 1.9 GPa critical pressure gives a concrete target for computational searches for structural instabilities and for high-pressure diffraction experiments aiming to catch the rattling displacements as they freeze out.
  • The absence of superconductivity down to the lowest temperatures as the density wave dies suggests that the first-order density wave in these materials is not a promising parent state for pressure-induced superconductivity.
  • A direct corollary of the rattling picture is that substituting tiny scandium for lutetium in LuNb6Sn6 should raise the density wave transition, a prediction the paper puts forward for future experiments.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the rattling mechanism is correct, a high-pressure diffraction experiment at 2 GPa and low temperature should show no static Sn-Sn bond modulation and sharply reduced atomic displacement parameters; that measurement, which the paper does not include, would settle the mechanism more directly than transport alone.
  • Because ScV6Sn6 and its Lu-doped variant reach their critical pressures at similar values despite different zero-pressure transition temperatures, the relevant parameter may be the compressibility of the framework rather than the initial cage size; extending this logic could turn the rattling model into a quantitative design rule for other filled-network compounds.
  • Pressure suppresses the transition without introducing chemical disorder, so the near-1.9 GPa region could host a fluctuating or precursor regime of the density wave worth probing with spectroscopy; the paper's resistance data are consistent with such a regime but do not establish it.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript reports temperature-dependent resistance measurements of LuNb6Sn6 under hydrostatic pressure up to 2.26 GPa. The authors observe that the sharp resistance drop associated with the 68 K density wave transition evolves with pressure into a cusp and then a broad step-up, and they extract transition temperatures from extrema in dR/dT. The resulting phase diagram shows a monotonic suppression of the transition, with the anomaly no longer resolved near 1.9 GPa, and no superconductivity emerging. The authors interpret this as confirming their earlier prediction that pressure should suppress the density wave, and as support for their rattling-chain model of structural instabilities in HfFe6Ge6-type kagome metals, in which compression removes the extra space needed for atomic displacements. They also compare the behavior with ScV6Sn6 and Lu-doped ScV6Sn6.

Significance. The experiment is a clean, direct test of a published prediction: the pressure data were collected after the prediction was made and could have refuted it. The resistance dataset is systematic, with pressures measured at low temperature via ruby fluorescence and the superconducting transition of a tin inclusion providing a reassuring internal calibration. The main result, if confirmed by a consistent transition-temperature definition, would establish pressure as a clean tuning knob for density wave order in LuNb6Sn6 and would strengthen the case that under-filled rattling chains, rather than standard Fermi-surface nesting, drive the instability. The paper also offers a concrete falsifiable prediction (Sc substitution should raise T*). The central weakness is that the mechanism conclusion rests on resistance data alone, without pressure-dependent structural measurements, and the T*(P) extraction uses non-equivalent derivative features.

major comments (3)
  1. [Results, Fig. 2b and Fig. 3] The central quantitative claim—that T* is "smoothly depressed and disappears around 1.9 GPa"—is built on transition temperatures that are not defined by a single criterion. At low pressure the maximum of dR/dT is used for a step-down, at intermediate pressure a cusp between maximum and minimum, and at high pressure the minimum of dR/dT for a "broadened first-order transition." These three descriptors need not track the same thermodynamic feature, and plotting them together in Fig. 3 and drawing one line through them presupposes that they do. Please demonstrate that the suppression trend is robust to a fixed extraction criterion (for example, the resistance midpoint, or onset/offset of the anomaly) and report how the inferred critical pressure shifts under that criterion.
  2. [Results and Discussion] The conclusion that the density wave order is absent near 1.9 GPa is inferred from the absence of a resistance anomaly. This is a null result: the feature broadens with pressure, so a weakened, broadened anomaly could fall below the derivative noise floor without implying that static order is gone. No structural measurement under pressure is presented to confirm that the static Sn-Sn modulation is actually suppressed. Because the paper's final conclusion is that pressure "strengthens the rattling chains origin," this gap is load-bearing. The Discussion's own concession that "compressing the lattice also modifies electronic structure in a way that could disfavor DW development" reinforces the need for either a structural probe or a quantitative estimate that the missing anomaly is below noise.
  3. [Discussion, comparison with ScV6Sn6] The comparison with ScV6Sn6 and (Sc,Lu)V6Sn6 in Fig. 3 is used to argue that the rattling mechanism applies across the family, but the different studies use different resistance-feature definitions and the current paper does not establish a common extraction scheme. Even if the trends are visually consistent, resistance alone cannot distinguish the steric (rattling) scenario from a pressure-induced electronic band-structure effect; the proposed Sc-substitution experiment would be a useful step, but pressure-dependent Hall coefficients or quantum oscillations would more directly test electronic changes. Please either add such data or explicitly reframe the conclusion as a consistency argument rather than a mechanism proof.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Conclusion] The sentence "Our temperature dependent resistance measurements reveal confirm this" should read "reveal and confirm this" or simply "confirm this."
  2. [Discussion] In the sentence beginning "The pressure evolution of the transition temperatures," the reference should be "Fig. 3" with a capital F, and the verb should agree with the subject.
  3. [Results] The 0.1 GPa resistance feature occurs at 64 K while the zero-pressure x-ray transition is 68 K; please state explicitly that this difference is expected from the different physical probes and from the finite applied pressure.
  4. [References] References [3] and [4] are missing publication years; please complete the bibliographic entries.
  5. [Fig. 2 caption] Error bars are shown only for temperature; please also report the pressure uncertainty at low temperature and specify how the pressure was determined for each curve.
  6. [Methods] The phrase "All data was collected with cooling curves" should be "All data were collected."

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circularity: the pressure measurement independently tests the authors' previously stated prediction, and the rattling-model interpretation is not assumed as input.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is an empirical test: the prior rattling-chain model (refs. 35 and 38) led to a prediction that the density-wave transition in LuNb6Sn6 would be suppressed by pressure, and the present resistance measurements under hydrostatic pressure either confirm or refute that prediction. The prediction was published before and is not fitted to the outcome; the measured T(P) trend is extracted from independently recorded transport data with stated criteria for identifying transition features. The changing shape of the resistance anomaly (step-down, cusp, step-up) means different derivative markers are used at different pressures, but this is a robustness and definitional concern about the order-parameter proxy, not a circular reduction: the markers are read from the data, not constructed from the conclusion. The paper's appeal to the rattling-chain mechanism is interpretive and is explicitly accompanied by an alternative electronic-structure possibility in the Discussion. Self-citations to the authors' earlier work are present, but they supply the model being tested and the prior characterization of the zero-pressure transition; they do not inject the new pressure-dependent result as an input. No equation, fitted parameter, or cited theorem is equivalent by construction to the reported suppression, so there is no significant circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central measurement introduces no new free parameters or entities. The main interpretive burden is the steric rattling mechanism, which is assumed from prior work and not directly tested by structural measurements under pressure.

assumptions (3)
  • domain assumption The resistance anomaly near 64 K in LuNb6Sn6 marks the density wave transition observed at 68 K by x-ray diffraction at zero pressure.
    Assigned in Results using prior diffraction work [38]; no simultaneous structural probe under pressure is used.
  • domain assumption The dominant effect of pressure is steric: compressing the Nb-Sn framework removes the space that allows rattling-chain displacements.
    Discussion acknowledges electronic-structure changes as a possible alternative, so the steric mechanism is an assumption rather than a measured fact.
  • domain assumption The rattling-chain model developed for ScV6Sn6 transfers to LuNb6Sn6 because both share under-filled M6X6 scaffolding with static Sn-Sn bond modulation.
    Basis of the prediction in [38]; the present data are consistent with it but do not prove transferability.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Pressure suppresses the density wave order in kagome metal LuNb$_6$Sn$_6$." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/V62H5PPC

@misc{pith2026250204197,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Pressure suppresses the density wave order in kagome metal LuNb$_6$Sn$_6$},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/V62H5PPC}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.04197}
}
abstract

Dancing tins pair up, But compressing the framework Thwarts the displacements. The density waves that develop in kagome metals ScV$_{6}$Sn$_{6}$ and LuNb$_{6}$Sn$_{6}$ at low temperature appear to arise from under-filled atomic columns within a V-Sn or Nb-Sn scaffolding. Compressing this network with applied pressure in ScV$_{6}$Sn$_{6}$ suppressed the structural transition temperature by constraining atomic rattling and inhibiting the shifts that define the structural modulation. We predicted that the density wave transition in LuNb$_{6}$Sn$_{6}$ at 68 K would be suppressed by pressure as well. In this brief study, we examine the pressure dependence of the density wave transition by measuring resistance vs temperature up to 2.26 GPa. We found the transition temperature is smoothly depressed and disappears around 1.9 GPa. This result not only addresses our prediction, but strengthens the rattling chains origin of structural instabilities in the HfFe$_{6}$Ge$_{6}$-type kagome metals.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.04197 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. FIG. 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. a presents the normalized resistance vs tem￾perature data obtained for a series of pressure. The la￾beled pressures were estimated at base temperature. At the lowest pressure, resistivity drops sharply on cooling through 64 K. This corresponds to the development of the density wave modulation observed by x-ray diffraction at zero pressure at 68 K.[38] In ScV6Sn6 this drop has been tied to an increase in carrier mobi… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. FIG. 3. Phase diagram reveals the suppression of the phase [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

47 extracted references · 39 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Sacchetti, E

    A. Sacchetti, E. Arcangeletti, A. Perucchi, L. Baldas- sarre, P. Postorino, S. Lupi, N. Ru, I. R. Fisher, and L. Degiorgi, Pressure dependence of the charge-density- wave gap in rare-earth tritellurides, Physical Review Let- ters 98, 026401 (2007)

    work page 2007

  2. [2]

    R. F. Luccas, A. Fente, J. Hanko, A. Correa-Orellana, E. Herrera, E. Climent-Pascual, J. Azpeitia, T. P´ erez- Casta˜ neda, M. R. Osorio, E. Salas-Colera, N. M. Nemes, F. J. Mompean, M. Garc ´ ıa-Hern´ andez, J. G. Rodrigo, M. A. Ramos, I. Guillam´ on, S. Vieira, and H. Suderow, Charge density wave in layered La 1−xCexSb2, Physical Review B 92, 235153 (2015)

    work page 2015

  3. [3]

    S. L. Bud’ko, S. Huyan, P. Herrera-Siklody, and P. C. Canfield, Rapid suppression of charge density wave tran- sition in LaSb 2 under pressure, Philosophical Magazine 103, 561 ()

    work page

  4. [4]

    S. L. Bud’ko, T. A. Wiener, R. A. Ribeiro, P. C. Canfield, Y. Lee, T. Vogt, and A. H. Lacerda, Effect of pressure and chemical substitutions on the charge-density-wave in LaAgSb2, Physical Review B 73, 184111 ()

    work page

  5. [5]

    Wang, Z.-Z

    W.-S. Wang, Z.-Z. Li, Y.-Y. Xiang, and Q.-H. Wang, Competing electronic orders on kagome lattices at van Hove filling, Physical Review B—Condensed Matter and Materials Physics 87, 115135 (2013)

    work page 2013

  6. [6]

    M. L. Kiesel, C. Platt, and R. Thomale, Unconventional Fermi surface instabilities in the kagome Hubbard model, Physical Review Letters 110, 126405 (2013)

    work page 2013

  7. [7]

    B. R. Ortiz, L. C. Gomes, J. R. Morey, M. Winiarski, M. Bordelon, J. S. Mangum, I. W. H. Oswald, J. A. Rodriguez-Rivera, J. R. Neilson, S. D. Wil- son, E. Ertekin, T. M. McQueen, and E. S. To- berer, New kagome prototype materials: discovery of KV3Sb5,RbV3Sb5 , and CsV 3Sb5, Physical Review Ma- terials 3, 094407 (2019)

    work page 2019

  8. [8]

    S. D. Wilson and B. R. Ortiz, AV 3Sb5 kagome supercon- ductors, Nat. Rev. Mater. , 9756 (2024)

    work page 2024

Show all 47 references
  1. [9]

    Y. Li, Y. Liu, X. Du, S. Wu, W. Zhao, K. Zhai, Y. Hu, S. Zhang, H. Chen, J. Liu, Y. Yang, C. Peng, M. Hashimoto, D. Lu, Z. Liu, Y. Wang, Y. Chen, G. Cao, and L. Yang, Electron correlation and incipient flat bands in the Kagome superconductor CsCr 3Sb5, Nature Com- munications ...

    2025 doi

  2. [10]

    N. Wang, Y. Gu, M. A. McGuire, J. Yan, L. Shi, Q. Cui, K. Chen, Y. Wang, H. Zhang, H. Yang, X. Dong, K. Jiang, J. Hu, B. Wang, J. Sun, and J. Cheng, A density-wave-like transition in the polycrystalline V 3Sb2 sample with bilayer kagome lattice, Chinese Physics B 31, 017106 (2022)

    2022

  3. [11]

    Plokhikh, C

    I. Plokhikh, C. Mielke, H. Nakamura, V. Petricek, Y. Qin, V. Sazgari, J. K¨ uspert, I. Bia lo, S. Shin, O. Ivashko, J. N. Graham, M. v. Zimmermann, M. Medarde, A. Amato, R. Khasanov, H. Luetkens, M. H. Fischer, M. Z. Hasan, J.-X. Yin, T. Ne- upert, J. Chang, G. Xu, S. Nakatsuj...

    2024 doi

  4. [12]

    Y. Wang, G. T. McCandless, X. Wang, K. Thanabal- asingam, H. Wu, D. Bouwmeester, H. S. J. van der Zant, M. N. Ali, and J. Y. Chan, Electronic properties and phase transition in the kagome metal Yb 0.5Co3Ge3, Chemistry of Materials 34, 7337 (2022)

    2022

  5. [13]

    X. Teng, J. S. Oh, H. Tan, L. Chen, J. Huang, B. Gao, J.-X. Yin, J.-H. Chu, M. Hashimoto, D. Lu, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, G. E. Granroth, B. Yan, R. J. Birgeneau, P. Dai, and M. Yi, Magnetism and charge density wave order in kagome FeGe, Nature Physics 19, 814 (2023)

    2023

  6. [14]

    X. Teng, L. Chen, F. Ye, E. Rosenberg, Z. Liu, J.-X. Yin, Y.-X. Jiang, J. S. Oh, M. Z. Hasan, K. J. Neubauer, B. Gao, Y. Xie, M. Hashimoto, D. Lu, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, R. J. Birgeneau, J.-H. Chu, M. Yi, and P. Dai, Discovery of charge density wave in a kagome...

    2022

  7. [15]

    Z. Chen, X. Wu, S. Zhou, J. Zhang, R. Yin, Y. Li, M. Li, J. Gong, M. He, Y. Chai, X. Zhou, Y. Wang, A. Wang, Y.-J. Yan, and D.-L. Feng, Discovery of a long-ranged charge order with 1/4 Ge1-dimerization in an antifer- romagnetic kagome metal, Nature Communications 15, 10.1038/s...

    2024 doi

  8. [16]

    The density wave instability observed below 92 K in ScV 6Sn6 has received significant attention due to some of its peculiar features

    all develop periodic structural distortions on cool- ing. The density wave instability observed below 92 K in ScV 6Sn6 has received significant attention due to some of its peculiar features. These include cu- rious transport properties,[17–20] competing density wave instabili...

    2025 arXiv

  9. [17]

    H. W. S. Arachchige, W. R. Meier, M. Marshall, T. Mat- suoka, R. Xue, M. A. McGuire, R. P. Hermann, H. Cao, and D. Mandrus, Charge density wave in kagome lat- tice intermetallic ScV6Sn6, Physical Review Letters 129, 216402 (2022)

    2022

  10. [18]

    Mozaffari, W

    S. Mozaffari, W. R. Meier, R. P. Madhogaria, N. Peshcherenko, S.-H. Kang, J. W. Villanova, H. W. S. Arachchige, G. Zheng, Y. Zhu, K.-W. Chen, K. Jenk- ins, D. Zhang, A. Chan, L. Li, M. Yoon, Y. Zhang, and D. G. Mandrus, Universal sublinear resistivity in vana- dium kagome mate...

    2024

  11. [19]

    J. M. DeStefano, E. Rosenberg, O. Peek, Y. Lee, Z. Liu, Q. Jiang, L. Ke, and J.-H. Chu, Pseudogap behavior in charge density wave kagome material ScV 6Sn6 revealed by magnetotransport measurements, npj Quantum Ma- terials 8, 10.1038/s41535-023-00600-8 (2023)

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    C. Yi, X. Feng, N. Mao, P. Yanda, S. Roychowdhury, Y. Zhang, C. Felser, and C. Shekhar, Quantum os- cillations revealing topological band in kagome metal ScV6Sn6, Physical Review B 109, 035124 (2024)

    2024

  13. [21]

    C. N. Kuo, R. Y. Huang, W. S. Tian, C. K. Hong, Y. R. Ou, Y. K. Kuo, and C. S. Lue, Effects of lattice instability on the thermoelectric behavior of kagome metal ScV6Sn6, Applied Physics Letters 125, 10.1063/5.0231041 (2024)

    2024 doi

  14. [22]

    S. Cao, C. Xu, H. Fukui, T. Manjo, Y. Dong, M. Shi, Y. Liu, C. Cao, and Y. Song, Competing charge-density wave instabilities in the kagome metal ScV 6Sn6, Na- ture Communications 14, 10.1038/s41467-023-43454-1 (2023)

    2023 doi

  15. [23]

    Korshunov, H

    A. Korshunov, H. Hu, D. Subires, Y. Jiang, D. C˘ alug˘ aru, X. Feng, A. Rajapitamahuni, C. Yi, S. Roychowdhury, M. G. Vergniory, J. Strempfer, C. Shekhar, E. Vescovo, D. Chernyshov, A. H. Said, A. Bosak, C. Felser, B. A. Bernevig, and S. Blanco-Canosa, Softening of a flat phon...

    2023 doi

  16. [24]

    H. Hu, Y. Jiang, D. C˘ alug˘ aru, X. Feng, D. Subires, M. G. Vergniory, C. Felser, S. Blanco-Canosa, and B. A. Bernevig, Kagome materials I: SG 191, ScV 6Sn6. flat phonon soft modes and unconventional charge density 6 wave formation: Microscopic and effective theory, Phys- ica...

    2025

  17. [25]

    Pokharel, B

    G. Pokharel, B. R. Ortiz, L. Kautzsch, S. J. Gomez Al- varado, K. Mallayya, G. Wu, E.-A. Kim, J. P. C. Ruff, S. Sarker, and S. D. Wilson, Frustrated charge order and cooperative distortions in ScV6Sn6, Physical Review Ma- terials 7, 104201 (2023)

    2023

  18. [26]

    Subedi, Order-by-disorder charge density wave con- densation at q=(1/3,1/3,1/3) in kagome metal ScV 6Sn6, Physical Review Materials 8, 014006 (2024)

    A. Subedi, Order-by-disorder charge density wave con- densation at q=(1/3,1/3,1/3) in kagome metal ScV 6Sn6, Physical Review Materials 8, 014006 (2024)

    2024

  19. [27]

    K. Wang, S. Chen, S.-W. Kim, and B. Monserrat, Origin of competing charge density waves in kagome metal ScV 6Sn6, Nat Commun 15, 10428 (2024) 15, 10.1038/s41467-024-54702-3 (2024), 2403.17058 [cond- mat.str-el]

    2024 arXiv

  20. [28]

    Tan and B

    H. Tan and B. Yan, Abundant lattice instability in kagome metal ScV 6Sn6, Physical Review Letters 130, 266402 (2023)

    2023

  21. [29]

    Tuniz, A

    M. Tuniz, A. Consiglio, D. Puntel, C. Bigi, S. Enzner, G. Pokharel, P. Orgiani, W. Bronsch, F. Parmigiani, V. Polewczyk, P. D. C. King, J. W. Wells, I. Zeljkovic, P. Carrara, G. Rossi, J. Fujii, I. Vobornik, S. D. Wilson, R. Thomale, T. Wehling, G. Sangiovanni, G. Panaccione, ...

    2023 doi

  22. [30]

    S. Lee, C. Won, J. Kim, J. Yoo, S. Park, J. Den- linger, C. Jozwiak, A. Bostwick, E. Rotenberg, R. Comin, M. Kang, and J.-H. Park, Nature of charge density wave in kagome metal ScV 6Sn6, npj Quantum Materials 9, 10.1038/s41535-024-00620-y (2024)

    2024 doi

  23. [31]

    D. W. Kim, S. Liu, C. Wang, H. W. Nam, G. Pokharel, S. D. Wilson, J.-H. Cho, and S. J. Moon, Infrared probe of the charge density wave gap in ScV 6Sn6, Physical Re- view B 108, 205118 (2023)

    2023

  24. [32]

    Cheng, S

    Z.-J. Cheng, S. Shao, B. Kim, T. A. Cochran, X. P. Yang, C. Yi, Y.-X. Jiang, J. Zhang, M. S. Hossain, S. Roychowdhury, T. Yilmaz, E. Vescovo, A. Fedorov, S. Chandra, C. Felser, G. Chang, and M. Z. Hasan, Untangle charge-order dependent bulk states from sur- face effects in a t...

    2024 doi arXiv

  25. [33]

    Y.-C. Yang, S. Cho, T.-R. Li, X.-Q. Liu, Z.-T. Liu, Z.-C. Jiang, J.-Y. Ding, W. Xia, Z.-C. Tao, J.-Y. Liu, W.-C. Jing, Y. Huang, Y.-M. Shi, S. Huh, T. Kondo, Z. Sun, J.-S. Liu, M. Ye, Y.-L. Wang, Y.-F. Guo, and D.-W. Shen, Unveiling the charge density wave mechanism in vanadiu...

    2024 doi arXiv

  26. [34]

    A. K. Kundu, X. Huang, E. Seewald, E. Ritz, S. Pakhira, S. Zhang, D. Sun, S. Turkel, S. Shabani, T. Yilmaz, E. Vescovo, C. R. Dean, D. C. Johnston, T. Valla, T. Birol, D. N. Basov, R. M. Fernandes, and A. N. Pasu- pathy, Low-energy electronic structure in the unconven- tional ...

    2024 doi

  27. [35]

    Zhang, J

    X. Zhang, J. Hou, W. Xia, Z. Xu, P. Yang, A. Wang, Z. Liu, J. Shen, H. Zhang, X. Dong, Y. Uwatoko, J. Sun, B. Wang, Y. Guo, and J. Cheng, Destabilization of the charge density wave and the absence of superconductivity in ScV6Sn6 under high pressures up to 11 GPa, Materials 15,...

    2022

  28. [36]

    W. R. Meier, R. P. Madhogaria, S. Mozaffari, M. Mar- shall, D. E. Graf, M. A. McGuire, H. W. S. Arachchige, C. L. Allen, J. Driver, H. Cao, and D. Mandrus, Tiny Sc allows the chains to rattle: Impact of Lu and Y doping on the charge-density wave in ScV 6Sn6, Journal of the Ame...

    2023

  29. [37]

    Cheng, Z

    S. Cheng, Z. Ren, H. Li, J. S. Oh, H. Tan, G. Pokharel, J. M. DeStefano, E. Rosenberg, Y. Guo, Y. Zhang, Z. Yue, Y. Lee, S. Gorovikov, M. Zonno, M. Hashimoto, D. Lu, L. Ke, F. Mazzola, J. Kono, R. J. Birgeneau, J.-H. Chu, S. D. Wilson, Z. Wang, B. Yan, M. Yi, and I. Zeljkovic,...

    2024 doi

  30. [38]

    Y. Hu, J. Ma, Y. Li, Y. Jiang, D. J. Gawryluk, T. Hu, J. Teyssier, V. Multian, Z. Yin, S. Xu, S. Shin, I. Plokhikh, X. Han, N. C. Plumb, Y. Liu, J.-X. Yin, Z. Guguchia, Y. Zhao, A. P. Schnyder, X. Wu, E. Pomjakushina, M. Z. Hasan, N. Wang, and M. Shi, Phonon promoted charge de...

    2024 doi

  31. [39]

    B. R. Ortiz, W. R. Meier, G. Pokharel, J. Chamorro, F. Yang, S. Mozaffari, A. Thaler, S. J. Gomez Alvarado, H. Zhang, D. S. Parker, G. D. Samolyuk, J. A. M. Pad- dison, J. Yan, F. Ye, S. Sarker, S. D. Wilson, H. Miao, D. Mandrus, and M. A. McGuire, Stability frontiers in the a...

    2025

  32. [40]

    P. C. Canfield, T. Kong, U. S. Kaluarachchi, and N. H. Jo, Use of frit-disc crucibles for routine and exploratory solution growth of single crystalline samples, Philos. Mag. 96, 84 (2016)

    2016

  33. [41]

    Staˇ sko, J

    D. Staˇ sko, J. Prchal, M. Klicpera, S. Aoki, and K. Mu- rata, Pressure media for high pressure experiments, Daphne oil 7000 series, High Pressure Research 40, 525 (2020)

    2020

  34. [42]

    See supplemental material at [url] for resistance data. (2025)

    2025

  35. [43]

    G. J. Piermarini, S. Block, J. D. Barnett, and R. A. For- man, Calibration of the pressure dependence of the R1 ruby fluorescence line to 195 kbar, Journal of Applied Physics 46, 2774 (1975)

    1975

  36. [44]

    T. Hu, H. Pi, S. Xu, L. Yue, Q. Wu, Q. Liu, S. Zhang, R. Li, X. Zhou, J. Yuan, D. Wu, T. Dong, H. Weng, and N. Wang, Optical spectroscopy and band structure calculations of the structural phase transition in the vanadium-based kagome metal ScV 6Sn6, Physical Re- view B 107, 16...

    2023

  37. [45]

    N. B. Brandt and N. I. Ginzburg, Effect of high pres- sure on the superconducting properties of metals, Soviet Physics Uspekhi 8, 202 (1965)

    1965

  38. [46]

    Gr¨ uner,Density waves in solids (Perseus Publishing, Cambridge, Mass., 1994)

    G. Gr¨ uner,Density waves in solids (Perseus Publishing, Cambridge, Mass., 1994)

    1994

  39. [47]

    S. Liu, C. Wang, S. Yao, Y. Jia, Z. Zhang, and J.-H. Cho, Driving mechanism and dynamic fluctuations of charge density waves in the kagome metal ScV 6Sn6, Physical Review B 109, l121103 (2024)

    2024

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.