Multichannel active-space embedding of atomic multiplets in plane-wave DFT/PAW for core-level spectroscopies

Alessandro Longo; Alessandro Mirone; Christoph Sahle; Mauro Rovezzi

arxiv: 2502.04690 · v4 · submitted 2025-02-07 · ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

Multichannel active-space embedding of atomic multiplets in plane-wave DFT/PAW for core-level spectroscopies

Alessandro Mirone , Mauro Rovezzi , Christoph Sahle , Alessandro Longo This is my paper

Pith reviewed 2026-05-23 03:38 UTC · model grok-4.3

classification ❄️ cond-mat.str-el

keywords core-level spectroscopyactive-space embeddingplane-wave DFTatomic multipletscontinuum resonancesCe N4,5 edgesgiant dipole resonance

0 comments

The pith

An active-space embedding framework in plane-wave DFT/PAW connects localized atomic multiplets to continuum resonances for core-level spectroscopies.

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The paper presents a multichannel active-space embedding method that places the correlated multiplet manifold of an absorber, including core-hole and open-shell states, into a plane-wave DFT/PAW calculation by coherently coupling it to a plane-wave photoelectron. This produces a single description that treats both sharp localized multiplet features and broader continuum lineshapes without separate static-screening approximations. Spectra are generated in a time-domain formulation equivalent to Fermi's golden rule by applying a transition operator to the ground state and evaluating the wavepacket autocorrelation via Lanczos tridiagonalization or the kernel polynomial method. Validation at the cerium N4,5 edges shows quantitative agreement with measured high-Q multiplet structure and the low-Q giant dipole resonance, including a low-energy shoulder used for valence assignments. The implementation is released open-source in the Quantum ESPRESSO XSPECTRA package.

Core claim

The central claim is that an active-space embedding framework connects localized atomic multiplets to continuum resonances inside a plane-wave DFT/PAW description by coherently coupling the correlated multiplet manifold of the absorber (core hole plus open-shell configurations) to the plane-wave photoelectron, thereby enabling a unified treatment of localized multiplet structure and continuum lineshapes that is computed via a general time-domain formulation equivalent to Fermi's golden rule without explicit real-time propagation.

What carries the argument

The multichannel active-space embedding framework, which coherently couples the correlated multiplet manifold of the absorber to the plane-wave photoelectron within a standard DFT/PAW setup.

If this is right

The method reproduces in quantitative agreement with experiment both high-Q multiplet features and the low-Q giant dipole resonance continuum at the Ce N4,5 edges.
It supplies a unified treatment of localized multiplet structure and continuum lineshapes without separate two-particle core-exciton calculations.
The low-energy shoulder in the calculated spectrum supports robust Ce valence assignments.
Spectra are obtained from the Fourier transform of the wavepacket autocorrelation without explicit real-time propagation.

Where Pith is reading between the lines

These are editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

The parameter-free character of the embedding may allow direct application to other absorber edges where multiplet-continuum competition is important.
The time-domain formulation could be extended to model time-resolved core-level signals by retaining the explicit wavepacket evolution.
Because the approach stays inside standard DFT/PAW, it may reduce the need for hybrid screening models when continuum resonances dominate the lineshape.

Load-bearing premise

The active-space embedding accurately captures the coherent coupling between the correlated multiplet manifold of the absorber and the plane-wave photoelectron without requiring explicit real-time propagation or additional fitted screening parameters beyond the standard DFT/PAW setup.

What would settle it

Failure to reproduce the experimental low-energy shoulder or the shape of the giant dipole resonance in the calculated Ce N4,5-edge spectrum would falsify the claim that the embedding provides a quantitatively accurate unified treatment.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.04690 by Alessandro Longo, Alessandro Mirone, Christoph Sahle, Mauro Rovezzi.

**Figure 2.** Figure 2: FIG. 2. XRS at the Ce [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗

read the original abstract

We introduce an active-space embedding framework for core-level spectroscopies that connects localized atomic multiplets to continuum resonances within a plane-wave DFT/PAW description. The approach is complementary to widely used core-level Bethe--Salpeter implementations based on a two-particle (core-exciton) picture with typically static screening: here a correlated multiplet manifold of the absorber (including the core hole and open-shell configurations) is coherently coupled to a plane-wave photoelectron, enabling a unified treatment of localized multiplet structure and continuum lineshapes. Spectra are computed in a general time-domain formulation equivalent to Fermi's golden rule: a transition operator tailored to the specific spectroscopy technique is applied to the correlated ground state to generate an excited wavepacket, and the corresponding wavepacket autocorrelation function is evaluated without explicit real-time propagation, using Lanczos tridiagonalization or the kernel polynomial method; the spectral intensity follows from its Fourier representation. We validate the method at the Ce \(N_{4,5}\) edges, reproducing in quantitative agreement with experiment both high-\(Q\) multiplet features and the low-\(Q\) giant dipole resonance continuum, including a characteristic low-energy shoulder relevant for robust Ce valence assignments. The implementation is available open-source within the Quantum ESPRESSO XSPECTRA package (xspectruplet mode), together with reproducible inputs and scripts.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, simulated authors' rebuttal, and a circularity audit. Tearing a paper down is the easy half of reading it; the pith above is the substance, this is the friction.

Desk Editor's Note private letter to a colleague

The new multichannel embedding looks workable for Ce core spectra but the coupling assumption needs explicit checks in the full text.

read the letter

The main takeaway is that this paper gives a concrete way to embed atomic multiplets into plane-wave DFT/PAW so that both localized multiplet structure and continuum resonances come out of one calculation. The time-domain route via a tailored transition operator and Lanczos or KPM autocorrelation avoids explicit propagation and uses only standard DFT/PAW inputs. That is the actual novelty: the coherent multichannel coupling in an active-space setup that is released open-source inside xspectruplet mode of Quantum ESPRESSO, with scripts provided. It does well on the Ce N4,5 edges by reproducing the high-Q multiplet lines plus the low-Q giant dipole resonance and its low-energy shoulder, which matters for valence assignments. The validation is against external experiment rather than self-consistency loops, which is a point in its favor. The soft spots sit where the abstract leaves them: no reported convergence tests on active-space size, no error bars, and no breakdown of how the embedding operator is constructed in practice. The central assumption—that the plane-wave photoelectron and the multiplet manifold couple correctly without extra fitted screening—therefore stays untested in the summary we have. If the full manuscript shows those checks and the coupling holds, the method is useful; if the choices turn out to act like hidden parameters, the quantitative claim weakens. This is aimed at people who already run core-level calculations on open-shell systems and want a single framework instead of stitching multiplet codes to separate continuum treatments. A reader who needs the code and the Ce example will get something concrete. It is worth sending to referees because the framework is new, the implementation is public, and the experimental comparison is external. I would accept it for peer review.

Referee Report

2 major / 1 minor

Summary. The paper introduces a multichannel active-space embedding framework for core-level spectroscopies within plane-wave DFT/PAW. It couples a correlated multiplet manifold (core hole and open shells) of the absorber to a plane-wave photoelectron continuum via a time-domain formulation equivalent to Fermi's golden rule, using a tailored transition operator and wavepacket autocorrelation evaluated by Lanczos tridiagonalization or kernel polynomial method without explicit propagation. The method is implemented open-source in Quantum ESPRESSO XSPECTRA (xspectruplet mode) and validated at the Ce N4,5 edges, claiming quantitative agreement with experiment for both high-Q multiplet features and the low-Q giant dipole resonance continuum including a low-energy shoulder.

Significance. If the central claim holds, the framework offers a unified parameter-light treatment of localized multiplets and continuum lineshapes that complements static-screening BSE approaches, with the open-source implementation and reproducible inputs providing a concrete strength for the field.

major comments (2)

[Validation section] Validation section: the claim of quantitative agreement with experiment on the Ce N4,5 edges (including the low-energy shoulder) is presented without reported error bars, systematic convergence tests with respect to active-space size, or explicit checks on sensitivity to the embedding projector/cutoff choices; this directly bears on whether the multichannel coupling is captured without effective parameters.
[Methods section on active-space embedding] Methods section on active-space embedding: the construction of the multichannel embedding and the tailored transition operator are described at a high level, but the manuscript does not demonstrate (via explicit test or derivation) that the plane-wave photoelectron description plus standard DFT/PAW inputs fully captures the coherent multiplet-continuum coupling without implicit screening adjustments, which is load-bearing for the unified-treatment claim.

minor comments (1)

[Abstract and Implementation] The abstract and implementation description refer to 'xspectruplet mode' without a brief definition or pointer to the corresponding input flag documentation.

Simulated Author's Rebuttal

2 responses · 0 unresolved

We thank the referee for their careful review and constructive feedback on our manuscript. We appreciate the recognition of the potential significance of the multichannel active-space embedding framework. Below, we provide point-by-point responses to the major comments and outline the revisions we will make to address them.

read point-by-point responses

Referee: [Validation section] Validation section: the claim of quantitative agreement with experiment on the Ce N4,5 edges (including the low-energy shoulder) is presented without reported error bars, systematic convergence tests with respect to active-space size, or explicit checks on sensitivity to the embedding projector/cutoff choices; this directly bears on whether the multichannel coupling is captured without effective parameters.

Authors: We acknowledge that the validation would benefit from additional systematic tests. In the revised manuscript, we will add convergence plots showing the spectra as a function of active-space size and embedding cutoff parameters. We will also discuss the agreement with experiment in more quantitative terms, noting that while formal error bars on the theoretical spectra are not straightforward due to the method's deterministic nature, the robustness can be assessed via these convergence studies. This will help confirm that the multichannel coupling is captured without effective parameters. revision: yes
Referee: [Methods section on active-space embedding] Methods section on active-space embedding: the construction of the multichannel embedding and the tailored transition operator are described at a high level, but the manuscript does not demonstrate (via explicit test or derivation) that the plane-wave photoelectron description plus standard DFT/PAW inputs fully captures the coherent multiplet-continuum coupling without implicit screening adjustments, which is load-bearing for the unified-treatment claim.

Authors: The framework is designed such that the embedding uses the standard PAW projectors and plane-wave basis without additional screening parameters, as the multiplet manifold is treated explicitly in the active space and coupled via the time-domain autocorrelation. To address this, we will include in the revised manuscript a more detailed derivation of the transition operator and embedding Hamiltonian in the Methods section, along with a brief test case demonstrating the coupling. This will explicitly show that no implicit adjustments are required beyond the DFT/PAW inputs. revision: yes

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged

No circularity: derivation self-contained with external experimental validation

full rationale

The paper introduces a new multichannel active-space embedding method within standard plane-wave DFT/PAW, computing spectra via a time-domain Fermi golden-rule equivalent (transition operator on ground state, autocorrelation via Lanczos tridiagonalization or kernel polynomial method) without explicit propagation. The central construction uses only standard DFT/PAW inputs and an open-source implementation in Quantum ESPRESSO. Validation is performed against independent experimental spectra at Ce N4,5 edges, reproducing both multiplet features and continuum lineshapes. No equations reduce by construction to fitted inputs, no load-bearing self-citations are invoked for uniqueness or ansatz, and no renaming of known results occurs. The derivation chain remains independent of its target outputs.

Axiom & Free-Parameter Ledger

0 free parameters · 2 axioms · 1 invented entities

The framework relies on standard DFT/PAW approximations for the continuum and the validity of the active-space truncation for the multiplet manifold; no explicit free parameters are named in the abstract, but the embedding construction implicitly assumes that the chosen active space and transition operator capture the essential coupling without additional ad-hoc adjustments.

axioms (2)

domain assumption Plane-wave DFT/PAW provides an adequate description of the continuum photoelectron states outside the active space.
Invoked when stating the embedding connects localized multiplets to plane-wave resonances.
standard math The time-domain autocorrelation function computed via Lanczos tridiagonalization or kernel polynomial method is equivalent to Fermi's golden rule for the spectral intensity.
Stated directly in the abstract as the computational route.

invented entities (1)

Multichannel active-space embedding framework no independent evidence
purpose: To coherently couple the correlated multiplet manifold of the absorber to the plane-wave photoelectron.
New construction introduced in the paper; no independent evidence provided beyond the Ce validation.

pith-pipeline@v0.9.0 · 5789 in / 1788 out tokens · 27814 ms · 2026-05-23T03:38:36.084452+00:00 · methodology

discussion (0)

Lean theorems connected to this paper

Citations machine-checked in the Pith Canon. Every link opens the source theorem in the public Lean library.

IndisputableMonolith/Foundation/RealityFromDistinction.lean reality_from_one_distinction unclear

?

unclear
Relation between the paper passage and the cited Recognition theorem.

Slater integrals are rescaled by a reduction factor equal to 0.85... 0.75

What do these tags mean?

matches: The paper's claim is directly supported by a theorem in the formal canon.
supports: The theorem supports part of the paper's argument, but the paper may add assumptions or extra steps.
extends: The paper goes beyond the formal theorem; the theorem is a base layer rather than the whole result.
uses: The paper appears to rely on the theorem as machinery.
contradicts: The paper's claim conflicts with a theorem or certificate in the canon.
unclear: Pith found a possible connection, but the passage is too broad, indirect, or ambiguous to say the theorem truly supports the claim.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

34 extracted references · 34 canonical work pages

[1]

Kohn and L

W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev.140, A1133 (1965). [2] J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3865 (1996). 9

work page 1965
[2]

A. J. Cohen, P. Mori-Sánchez, and W. Yang, Chem- ical Reviews112, 289 (2012), pMID: 22191548, https://doi.org/10.1021/cr200107z

work page doi:10.1021/cr200107z 2012
[3]

F.AryasetiawanandO.Gunnarsson,Reportsonprogress in Physics61, 237 (1998)

work page 1998
[4]

Georges, G

A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth, and M. J. Rozenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys.68, 13 (1996)

work page 1996
[5]

B. T. Thole, G. van der Laan, J. C. Fuggle, G. A. Sawatzky, R. C. Karnatak, and J.-M. Esteva, Phys. Rev. B32, 5107 (1985)

work page 1985
[6]

de Groot and A

F. de Groot and A. Kotani, Core level spectroscopy of solids (2008)

work page 2008
[7]

Mirone, M

A. Mirone, M. Sacchi, and S. Gota, Physical Review B 61, 13540–13544 (2000)

work page 2000
[8]

M. W. Haverkort, M. Zwierzycki, and O. K. Andersen, Phys. Rev. B85, 165113 (2012)

work page 2012
[9]

Longo, R

A. Longo, R. Wernert, A. Iadecola, C. J. Sahle, L. Stievano, L. Croguennec, D. Carlier, and A. Mirone, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C126, 19782 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c05334

work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c05334 2022
[10]

A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, G. Pizzi, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Vanderbilt, and N. Marzari, Computer Physics Com- munications185, 2309 (2014)

work page 2014
[11]

Vinson, J

J. Vinson, J. J. Rehr, J. J. Kas, and E. L. Shirley, Phys. Rev. B83, 115106 (2011)

work page 2011
[12]

Prendergast and G

D. Prendergast and G. Galli, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 215502 (2006)

work page 2006
[13]

Vorwerk, C

C. Vorwerk, C. Cocchi, and C. Draxl, Phys. Rev. B95, 155121 (2017)

work page 2017
[14]

Gilmore, J

K. Gilmore, J. Vinson, E. Shirley, D. Prendergast, C. Pemmaraju, J. Kas, F. Vila, and J. Rehr, Computer Physics Communications197, 109 (2015)

work page 2015
[15]

Onida, L

G. Onida, L. Reining, and A. Rubio, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 601 (2002)

work page 2002
[16]

Cudazzo and L

P. Cudazzo and L. Reining, Phys. Rev. Research2, 012032 (2020)

work page 2020
[17]

Authier and P.-F

J. Authier and P.-F. Loos, J. Chem. Phys.153, 184105 (2020)

work page 2020
[18]

Bunău and M

O. Bunău and M. Calandra, Phys. Rev. B87, 205105 (2013)

work page 2013
[19]

Taillefumier, D

M. Taillefumier, D. Cabaret, A.-M. Flank, and F. Mauri, Phys. Rev. B66, 195107 (2002)

work page 2002
[20]

Gougoussis, M

C. Gougoussis, M. Calandra, A. P. Seitsonen, and F. Mauri, Phys. Rev. B80, 075102 (2009)

work page 2009
[21]

Giannozzi, O

P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. B. Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Cococcioni, N. Colonna, I. Carnimeo, A. D. Corso, S. de Gironcoli, P. Delugas, R. A. D. Jr, A. Ferretti, A. Floris, G. Fratesi, G. Fugallo, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, F. Giustino, T. Gorni, J. Jia, M. Kawa- mura, H.-Y. Ko, A. Kokalj, E. Küçük...

work page 2017
[22]

Giannozzi, S

P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococ- cioni, I. Dabo, A. Dal Corso, S. de Gironcoli, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin-Samos, N. Marzari, F. Mauri, R. Mazzarello, S. Paolini, A. Pasquarello, L. Paulatto, C. Sbraccia, S. S...

work page 2009
[23]

G.C.BaldwinandG.S.Klaiber,Phys.Rev.71,3(1947)

work page 1947
[24]

J. S. Levinger and H. A. Bethe, Phys. Rev.78, 115 (1950)

work page 1950
[25]

A. P. Yutsis, I. B. Levinson, and V. V. Vanagas, Academy of Sciences of the Lithuanian SS R (1962)

work page 1962
[26]

R. A. Gordon, G. T. Seidler, T. T. Fister, M. W. Haverkort, G. A. Sawatzky, A. Tanaka, and T. K. Sham, Europhysics Letters81, 26004 (2007)

work page 2007
[27]

Longo, A

A. Longo, A. Mirone, E. De Clermont Gallerande, C. J. Sahle, M. P. Casaletto, L. Amidani, S. A. Theofanidis, and F. Giannici, Cell Reports Physical Science4, 101699 (2023)

work page 2023
[28]

S. K. Das, A. Longo, E. Bianchi, C. V. Bordenca, C. J. Sahle, M. P. Casaletto, A. Mirone, and F. Giannici, ChemPhysChem 10.1002/cphc.202400742 (2024)

work page doi:10.1002/cphc.202400742 2024
[29]

Weiße, G

A. Weiße, G. Wellein, A. Alvermann, and H. Fehske, Re- views of Modern Physics78, 275 (2006)

work page 2006
[30]

Dagotto,Correlated Electrons in High-Temperature Superconductors(Springer, Berlin, 1994)

E. Dagotto,Correlated Electrons in High-Temperature Superconductors(Springer, Berlin, 1994)

work page 1994
[31]

The spin of on-site (ionic) electrons is part of|ai⟩; the spin of thephotoelectronis carried by the channel index iin the PW factor, as discussed below

work page
[32]

Xspectruplet project,https://gitlab.com/ xspectruplet/xspectruplet(2025), accessed: 2025-12- 07

work page 2025
[33]

Vanderbilt, Phys

D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B41, 7892 (1990)

work page 1990
[34]

Sen Gupta, J

S. Sen Gupta, J. A. Bradley, M. W. Haverkort, G. T. Seidler, A. Tanaka, and G. A. Sawatzky, Phys. Rev. B 84, 075134 (2011)

work page 2011

[1] [1]

Kohn and L

W. Kohn and L. J. Sham, Phys. Rev.140, A1133 (1965). [2] J. P. Perdew, K. Burke, and M. Ernzerhof, Phys. Rev. Lett.77, 3865 (1996). 9

work page 1965

[2] [2]

A. J. Cohen, P. Mori-Sánchez, and W. Yang, Chem- ical Reviews112, 289 (2012), pMID: 22191548, https://doi.org/10.1021/cr200107z

work page doi:10.1021/cr200107z 2012

[3] [3]

F.AryasetiawanandO.Gunnarsson,Reportsonprogress in Physics61, 237 (1998)

work page 1998

[4] [4]

Georges, G

A. Georges, G. Kotliar, W. Krauth, and M. J. Rozenberg, Rev. Mod. Phys.68, 13 (1996)

work page 1996

[5] [5]

B. T. Thole, G. van der Laan, J. C. Fuggle, G. A. Sawatzky, R. C. Karnatak, and J.-M. Esteva, Phys. Rev. B32, 5107 (1985)

work page 1985

[6] [6]

de Groot and A

F. de Groot and A. Kotani, Core level spectroscopy of solids (2008)

work page 2008

[7] [7]

Mirone, M

A. Mirone, M. Sacchi, and S. Gota, Physical Review B 61, 13540–13544 (2000)

work page 2000

[8] [8]

M. W. Haverkort, M. Zwierzycki, and O. K. Andersen, Phys. Rev. B85, 165113 (2012)

work page 2012

[9] [9]

Longo, R

A. Longo, R. Wernert, A. Iadecola, C. J. Sahle, L. Stievano, L. Croguennec, D. Carlier, and A. Mirone, The Journal of Physical Chemistry C126, 19782 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c05334

work page doi:10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c05334 2022

[10] [10]

A. A. Mostofi, J. R. Yates, G. Pizzi, Y.-S. Lee, I. Souza, D. Vanderbilt, and N. Marzari, Computer Physics Com- munications185, 2309 (2014)

work page 2014

[11] [11]

Vinson, J

J. Vinson, J. J. Rehr, J. J. Kas, and E. L. Shirley, Phys. Rev. B83, 115106 (2011)

work page 2011

[12] [12]

Prendergast and G

D. Prendergast and G. Galli, Phys. Rev. Lett.96, 215502 (2006)

work page 2006

[13] [13]

Vorwerk, C

C. Vorwerk, C. Cocchi, and C. Draxl, Phys. Rev. B95, 155121 (2017)

work page 2017

[14] [14]

Gilmore, J

K. Gilmore, J. Vinson, E. Shirley, D. Prendergast, C. Pemmaraju, J. Kas, F. Vila, and J. Rehr, Computer Physics Communications197, 109 (2015)

work page 2015

[15] [15]

Onida, L

G. Onida, L. Reining, and A. Rubio, Rev. Mod. Phys. 74, 601 (2002)

work page 2002

[16] [16]

Cudazzo and L

P. Cudazzo and L. Reining, Phys. Rev. Research2, 012032 (2020)

work page 2020

[17] [17]

Authier and P.-F

J. Authier and P.-F. Loos, J. Chem. Phys.153, 184105 (2020)

work page 2020

[18] [18]

Bunău and M

O. Bunău and M. Calandra, Phys. Rev. B87, 205105 (2013)

work page 2013

[19] [19]

Taillefumier, D

M. Taillefumier, D. Cabaret, A.-M. Flank, and F. Mauri, Phys. Rev. B66, 195107 (2002)

work page 2002

[20] [20]

Gougoussis, M

C. Gougoussis, M. Calandra, A. P. Seitsonen, and F. Mauri, Phys. Rev. B80, 075102 (2009)

work page 2009

[21] [21]

Giannozzi, O

P. Giannozzi, O. Andreussi, T. Brumme, O. Bunau, M. B. Nardelli, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, M. Cococcioni, N. Colonna, I. Carnimeo, A. D. Corso, S. de Gironcoli, P. Delugas, R. A. D. Jr, A. Ferretti, A. Floris, G. Fratesi, G. Fugallo, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, F. Giustino, T. Gorni, J. Jia, M. Kawa- mura, H.-Y. Ko, A. Kokalj, E. Küçük...

work page 2017

[22] [22]

Giannozzi, S

P. Giannozzi, S. Baroni, N. Bonini, M. Calandra, R. Car, C. Cavazzoni, D. Ceresoli, G. L. Chiarotti, M. Cococ- cioni, I. Dabo, A. Dal Corso, S. de Gironcoli, S. Fabris, G. Fratesi, R. Gebauer, U. Gerstmann, C. Gougoussis, A. Kokalj, M. Lazzeri, L. Martin-Samos, N. Marzari, F. Mauri, R. Mazzarello, S. Paolini, A. Pasquarello, L. Paulatto, C. Sbraccia, S. S...

work page 2009

[23] [23]

G.C.BaldwinandG.S.Klaiber,Phys.Rev.71,3(1947)

work page 1947

[24] [24]

J. S. Levinger and H. A. Bethe, Phys. Rev.78, 115 (1950)

work page 1950

[25] [25]

A. P. Yutsis, I. B. Levinson, and V. V. Vanagas, Academy of Sciences of the Lithuanian SS R (1962)

work page 1962

[26] [26]

R. A. Gordon, G. T. Seidler, T. T. Fister, M. W. Haverkort, G. A. Sawatzky, A. Tanaka, and T. K. Sham, Europhysics Letters81, 26004 (2007)

work page 2007

[27] [27]

Longo, A

A. Longo, A. Mirone, E. De Clermont Gallerande, C. J. Sahle, M. P. Casaletto, L. Amidani, S. A. Theofanidis, and F. Giannici, Cell Reports Physical Science4, 101699 (2023)

work page 2023

[28] [28]

S. K. Das, A. Longo, E. Bianchi, C. V. Bordenca, C. J. Sahle, M. P. Casaletto, A. Mirone, and F. Giannici, ChemPhysChem 10.1002/cphc.202400742 (2024)

work page doi:10.1002/cphc.202400742 2024

[29] [29]

Weiße, G

A. Weiße, G. Wellein, A. Alvermann, and H. Fehske, Re- views of Modern Physics78, 275 (2006)

work page 2006

[30] [30]

Dagotto,Correlated Electrons in High-Temperature Superconductors(Springer, Berlin, 1994)

E. Dagotto,Correlated Electrons in High-Temperature Superconductors(Springer, Berlin, 1994)

work page 1994

[31] [31]

The spin of on-site (ionic) electrons is part of|ai⟩; the spin of thephotoelectronis carried by the channel index iin the PW factor, as discussed below

work page

[32] [32]

Xspectruplet project,https://gitlab.com/ xspectruplet/xspectruplet(2025), accessed: 2025-12- 07

work page 2025

[33] [33]

Vanderbilt, Phys

D. Vanderbilt, Phys. Rev. B41, 7892 (1990)

work page 1990

[34] [34]

Sen Gupta, J

S. Sen Gupta, J. A. Bradley, M. W. Haverkort, G. T. Seidler, A. Tanaka, and G. A. Sawatzky, Phys. Rev. B 84, 075134 (2011)

work page 2011