Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 84 references

Phase Transitions with Coupled Lasers Array, PhD Research Summary

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper argues that arrays of coupled lasers form a controllable experimental platform for phase-transition physics, from crowd-synchrony transitions and XY-spin sampling to fast speckle reduction.

desk verdict Useful index to a strong PhD program, but the one new claim (percolation) is too thin to evaluate. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.04768 v1 pith:X4ND2Y66 submitted 2025-02-07 physics.optics

Simon Mahler This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.optics
keywords coupledlaserarraysphaselockingdegeneratecavitytransitionsXYmodelKibble-Zurekmechanismtopologicaldefectsspecklereduction
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Using a degenerate cavity laser that forms hundreds of independent coupled lasers, this research summary claims that the lasers' collective phases behave like a statistical-mechanics system. The headline result is the first experimental demonstration of crowd synchrony with coupled lasers: below a critical number of lasers the phases stay uncoupled, while above it most lasers lock together through a first-order-like transition, with the critical number following $M_c \propto K^{\nu}$ and $\nu = -2.4$, close to the predicted $-2.2$. The same platform is claimed to exhibit a second-order percolation transition, fair sampling of the classical XY spin Hamiltonian, Kibble-Zurek defect scaling, and synthetic gauge fields. If these claims are right, coupled laser arrays offer a tunable analog simulator for phase transitions and a practical source for high-brightness, low-speckle, shaped beams.

What carries the argument

The central object is the degenerate cavity laser (DCL), a self-imaging cavity in which a mask of holes at the near-field plane forms independent lasers and optical elements at the far-field or mid-field plane couple them. Dissipative coupling through mode competition drives the system to the lowest-loss state, which is the phase-locked state; the Kuramoto model maps each laser's phase onto a classical spin phase, making the laser array a physical instance of the XY Hamiltonian. The far-field coherence peak ratio, defined as the intensity ratio between phase-locking peaks and background, serves as the synchronization order parameter in the crowd-synchrony and percolation experiments.

What would settle it

Measure the relative optical phase between pairs of lasers across the crowd-synchrony transition. If the coherence peak ratio jumps while directly measured phase differences remain uniformly random for all numbers of lasers, the phase-locking interpretation is falsified; alternatively, blocking all but two lasers and observing that a far-field peak survives without a fixed relative phase would rule out phase locking.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that phase locking in a coupled laser array is a genuine phase-transition phenomenon, not just a synchronization metaphor. Experimentally, a star array of independent lasers coupled through a second, below-threshold 'hub' cavity shows crowd synchrony: for fewer than about 43 lasers the measured coherence peak ratio stays low, and above that number it jumps sharply while most lasers become phase-locked, a first-order-like transition whose critical number obeys a power law in the coupling strength. The paper also reports a second-order percolation transition in a square array, fair sampling of degenerate ground states of the XY Hamiltonian using roughly 250 parallel longitudinal modes, power-law defect densities under a coupling quench that it interprets through the Kibble-Zurek mechanism, and discrete topological-charge plateaus in a ring array with an artificial gauge field. On the applications side, it claims that an intracavity phase diffuser breaks spatial-mode degeneracy and suppresses laser speckle contrast down to nanosecond integration times.

Load-bearing premise

The experiments infer that lasers are phase-locked from the appearance of sharp peaks in the far-field intensity pattern rather than from a direct measurement of each laser's phase; if those peaks can arise from intensity correlations or spatial filtering without a common phase, the phase-locking and transition claims would be weakened.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • A single tabletop laser platform can realize both first-order-like and second-order-like transitions, with the number of lasers, coupling strength, and pump ratio as tunable control parameters.
  • Because each longitudinal mode acts as an independent simulator, the system can perform rapid fair sampling of degenerate ground states, including frustrated triangular and Kagome geometries.
  • The measured defect-density exponent $\nu = 0.25$ identifies a universality class for nearest-neighbor coupled phase oscillators under Kibble-Zurek ramps.
  • Inserting a random phase diffuser into the cavity suppresses speckle contrast to the nanosecond scale, pointing to full-field imaging of fast-moving objects without frame averaging.
  • Mid-field coupler masks can implement arbitrary phase locking and synthetic gauge fields, producing sharp first-order-like transitions between topological-charge states.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the far-field peak structure really reports the laser phases, the same transition could be tested more strictly by measuring each laser's phase interferometrically and looking for the order-parameter jump in the directly measured phase distribution.
  • The geometry-independent Gaussian coupling opens an obvious extension to disordered or frustrated lattices beyond those reported, since the coupling sign no longer depends on array spacing.
  • The nanosecond speckle suppression could be combined with the imaging-through-scattering result to build a camera that sees through thin diffusers at video frame rates, a use the summary reports only as separate demonstrations.
  • The artificial-gauge-field ring results suggest a laser-cavity route to Hofstadter-like spectra, but the summary stops short of mapping the full band structure; that mapping is a natural next step.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The manuscript is a personal research summary of the author's PhD work on coupled laser arrays in a degenerate cavity laser (DCL). It describes several coupling schemes (far-field, saturable-absorber nonlinear, Gaussian, mid-field) and their use in phase-locking arrays; it then claims to demonstrate crowd synchrony with a first-order-like transition, percolation with a second-order-like transition, fair sampling of the XY Hamiltonian, Kibble-Zurek-type topological-defect dynamics, a synthetic gauge field, and applications to speckle reduction, imaging through scattering media, and beam shaping. Most sections summarize previously published work by the author and collaborators, while Section 4.2 presents an unpublished percolation experiment that is used to support the second-order phase-transition claim in the abstract and conclusion.

Significance. If the central claims hold, the DCL platform is a versatile experimental testbed for statistical-physics analogies: it would realize first- and second-order-like phase transitions, simulate the XY model, produce Kibble-Zurek defect scaling, and enable fast speckle suppression. A notable strength is that most of the experimental work is already documented in peer-reviewed publications by the author (e.g., Phys. Rev. Research 2, 043220; Phys. Rev. Lett. 124, 133901; Optica 8, 880), which gives the coupling and XY-sampling claims external credibility. However, as a standalone document the manuscript does not provide derivations, raw data, error bars, or finite-size analyses for the scaling exponents and phase-transition claims; the quantitative support is therefore largely delegated to the references. In particular, the second-order percolation transition is supported only by a short unpublished section with no critical-exponent analysis. The significance of the overall program is real, but the evidentiary weight of this specific manuscript is limited and uneven.

major comments (5)
  1. [§4.2, Figs. 9-10] The assertion that the percolation probability 'follows a second-order phase transition' is not supported by the data presented in Fig. 10: there is no system-size dependence, no finite-size collapse, no extracted critical exponents, and no error bars or confidence intervals for the 50-realization ensemble averages. A smooth S-shaped percolation probability as a function of p is expected in any finite system even without a true thermodynamic transition, so the S-shape alone cannot substantiate a second-order transition. Please provide size-dependent measurements and a scaling collapse, or explicitly present this as a preliminary finite-size observation rather than a confirmation.
  2. [§4.2, Figs. 9(b) and 10] The control parameter p is not an independent occupation probability in this experiment. The text states that at low pump (R=1.1, R=1.2) small clusters do not lase and only relatively large clusters survive, so the observed lasing cluster set is a nonlinear, pump-dependent subset of the printed mask. The measured percolation probability is therefore a convolution of geometric site percolation with laser threshold and mode-competition effects, not a clean order parameter. This confound must be addressed, for example by restricting the analysis to parameters where the printed mask and the lasing pattern coincide, or by explicitly modeling the threshold selection, before the data can be used to test percolation theory.
  3. [§4.2] The statement that 'the critical probability is around half, as theoretically predicted' is inaccurate for the geometry described. For square-lattice site percolation, the accepted threshold is pc ≈ 0.593, not 0.5; 0.5 is the bond-percolation threshold on the square lattice. If the measured critical probability is indeed near 0.5, that discrepancy needs explanation rather than being presented as a validation of percolation theory.
  4. [§4.1, Fig. 8] The headline quantitative result, the power-law exponent νexp = -2.4 compared with νth = -2.2, is reported without the number of data points, the fitting range, or any uncertainty on νexp. Since this power-law agreement is the central evidence for the crowd-synchrony claim, the fit procedure and error bars should be given; if they appear in Ref. [13], they should be reproduced or explicitly summarized in this manuscript.
  5. [§4.4] The statement that a single exponent ν = 0.25 'indicating that our coupled phase oscillators systems belong to a new universality class' is not justified as written: the text does not state the assumed spatial dimension or the dynamic scaling relation used to extract ν from the defect-density power law, and it gives no uncertainty or comparison with known universality classes. Please provide the scaling formula and error estimate, or soften the claim to 'consistent with a universality class different from the standard 2D KZM prediction pending a full scaling analysis.'
minor comments (5)
  1. [Throughout] There are many typographical errors, including 'abosrber', 'Additionnaly', 'enveloppe', 'fundemental', 'Unversity', 'Magist`ere', 'th e', 'arragenment', and 'intership'; a careful proofreading pass is needed.
  2. [§1] The cross-references in the introduction are inconsistent: the text says 'Section 6 presents...' and 'Section 7 is a short biography with future prospect on laser speckles', but Section 7 is titled 'Concluding remarks and future prospects' and the biography appears after it; please correct the section numbering and descriptions.
  3. [§5, Fig. 13] The 'far-field intensity-level' used in Fig. 13(b) is never defined; since it is used to support discrete topological-charge plateaus, please define it precisely or refer to an equation in Ref. [9].
  4. [§6.1, Eq. (2)] In the speckle-contrast definition, the notation ⟨·⟩i and the subscript i are not defined; please specify explicitly whether the average is over spatial locations, time, or an ensemble of speckle patterns.
  5. [§3.2 and §4.1] Phase locking is inferred from far-field peak structure rather than from directly measured per-laser phases; a sentence justifying the Fourier relation and explaining why intensity-correlation or spatial-filtering artifacts are excluded would strengthen the order-parameter claims.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper's headline claims are compared against external theoretical benchmarks (Zamora-Munt crowd-synchrony exponent, percolation theory, XY model, Kibble-Zurek mechanism), and the many self-citations point to published, externally falsifiable experimental and numerical results.

full rationale

This PhD summary reports experimental and numerical results from the author's prior publications, but none of the load-bearing comparisons reduces by construction to the paper's own inputs. The crowd-synchrony claim (Section 4.1) compares a measured power-law exponent ν = −2.4 to the external theoretical prediction ν_th = −2.2 from Ref. [21] (Zamora-Munt et al., not the authors), and the order parameter is stated to be 'similarly to the total coherent intensity used in [21]' — an analogous measurement, not a fitted identity. The percolation claim (Section 4.2) invokes the standard 'critical probability is around half, as theoretically predicted' for percolation, which is an external textbook result; the fact that the experimental control parameter may be confounded by pump-dependent thresholding is a correctness/validity concern, not a circularity. The XY fair-sampling section (4.3) benchmarks against the known classical XY Hamiltonian ground-state manifold, and the Kibble-Zurek section (4.4) compares numerical defect-density scaling to the standard KZM power-law prediction. Self-citations appear throughout, but they cite peer-reviewed papers containing the actual measurements and simulations; those results are externally falsifiable and are not used as unverified premises to force the conclusions. No equation in the summary is shown to be equivalent to a fitted parameter by construction, and no 'prediction' is obtained by renaming or by definition. Therefore the derivation chain is not circular.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The summary's results rest mostly on previously published papers; this ledger captures the physical modeling assumptions that are invoked but not re-derived here.

free parameters (3)
  • Crowd-synchrony scaling exponent nu_exp = -2.4
    Fitted to the log-log plot of critical laser number M_c versus coupling K in Fig. 8(c); compared to theoretical nu_th = -2.2 from Ref. [21].
  • Numerical crowd-synchrony exponent nu_num = -2.2
    Obtained from simulations in Fig. 8(d); used to support agreement with theory. This is a fit, not derived from first principles in this document.
  • Kibble-Zurek defect-density exponent nu = 0.25
    Extracted from the power-law fit of steady-state defect density versus quench rate in Fig. 12(b); basis for claiming a new universality class.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Coupled lasers with constant field amplitudes are well approximated by Kuramoto phase oscillators.
    Invoked in Sections 4.3 and 4.4 to map laser phases to XY spins and to simulate defect dynamics. It ignores amplitude dynamics and gain nonlinearities.
  • domain assumption Dissipative coupling drives the system to the globally stable state of minimal loss, which is the ground state of the classical XY Hamiltonian.
    Used in Section 4.3 and throughout Section 3 to justify phase locking as ground-state optimization.
  • standard math The near-field and far-field planes of the degenerate cavity laser are related by an exact Fourier transform.
    Used in Sections 2.2 and 2.3 to interpret far-field intensity peaks as phase locking. Holds under paraxial and ideal-lens assumptions.
  • domain assumption The gain medium and cavity support up to 320,000 independent spatial modes and hundreds of independent longitudinal modes.
    Central to the speckle reduction and parallelism claims in Sections 2.1, 6.1, and 4.3; the independence of longitudinal modes is also used to explain intermediate topological-charge measurements in Section 5.
  • domain assumption A saturable absorber induces temporal Q-switching and nonlinear loss selection without altering the lasing mode spatial structure.
    Used in Section 3.2 to claim phase locking from far-field sharp peaks. The text states near-field distributions are unchanged, but does not measure phases directly.
  • standard math Fresnel propagation and the Gerchberg-Saxton algorithm describe mid-field coupling and mask design.
    Used in Section 3.4 for designing mid-field coupler masks.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Phase Transitions with Coupled Lasers Array, PhD Research Summary." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/X4ND2Y66

@misc{pith2026250204768,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Phase Transitions with Coupled Lasers Array, PhD Research Summary},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/X4ND2Y66}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.04768}
}
read the original abstract

Coupled laser arrays exhibit rich and complex physical properties, making them powerful tools for exploring a wide range of phenomena. They enable efficient ground-state optimization of complex landscapes, solve computational problems, reveal topological defects, study coupled oscillators and their universality classes, investigate classical spin systems and complex networks, enhance imaging through scattering media, suppress speckle noise, generate ultra-high-power laser beams, and produce high-resolution shaped beams. Here, I summarize my PhD research on phase-locking large networks of coupled lasers and controlling spatiotemporal lasing modes for rapid speckle reduction.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.04768 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Diagram of the multi-mode degenerate cavity laser (DCL) where spatial and temporal coherences can be controlled [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Experimental arrangement and results for versatile far-field coupling. (a) DCL arrangement with an optical element [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Degenerate cavity laser arrangement with a far-field saturable absorber for nonlinearly coupling lasers in a square [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (14 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Experimental arrangement and results for forming a Gaussian coupled array of lasers. (a) A Gaussian aperture [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Arrangement and procedure for implementing anti-symmetrical phase-coupling of lasers. (a) Conceptual experi [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Phase locked lasers in the in-phase and in the out-of-phase locking states in a square array and a ring array of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Configurations for observing crowd synchrony. (a) Millennium Bridge, (b) and (c) coupled lasers. (c) Experimental [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Synchronization of the lasers as a function of the number of lasers in a square array. (a) Coherence peak ratio [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Investigating percolation with coupled lasers. (a) Experimental arrangement comprised of a degenerate cavity laser [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Experimental and numerical percolation results with coupled lasers. (a) and (b) Number of clusters and percolation [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Experimental arrangement, array geometries, and representative results for fair sampling of XY Hamiltonian. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: The defects dynamics in a periodic square array of 200 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p016_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Artificial gauge field in a ring array of lasers. (a) Magnitude of the topological charge in a ring of lasers as a [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_13.png]
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: Speckles reduction by the means of a DCL and a near-field phase diffuser. (a) Experimental arrangement of a DCL [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_14.png]
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: Experimental arrangements and results for imaging through weak scattering media. (a) DCL arrangement with [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_15.png]
Figure 16
Figure 16. Figure 16: Digital DCL arrangement and the generation of a Newton lasing mode (formed in less than 1 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_16.png]
Figure 17
Figure 17. Figure 17: Intensity distributions at different propagation distances of a lasing beam with two different intensity distributions [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p022_17.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

84 extracted references · 61 canonical work pages

  1. [13]

    Experimental demonstration of crowd synchrony and first-order transition with lasers

    Simon Mahler, Asher A. Friesem, and Nir Davidson. “Experimental demonstration of crowd synchrony and first-order transition with lasers”. In: Phys. Rev. Research 2 (4 Nov. 2020), p. 043220. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043220. url: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.043220

    doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.043220 2020

  2. [1]

    Phase locking of optically coupled lasers

    A F Glova. “Phase locking of optically coupled lasers”. In: Quantum Electronics 33.4 (Apr. 2003), pp. 283–306. doi: 10.1070/qe2003v033n04abeh002415. url: https://doi.org/10.1070%2Fqe2003v033n04abeh002415

    work page doi:10.1070/qe2003v033n04abeh002415 2003

  3. [2]

    Rapid fair sampling of the XY spin Hamiltonian with a laser simulator

    Vishwa Pal et al. “Rapid fair sampling of the XY spin Hamiltonian with a laser simulator”. In: Phys. Rev. Research 2 (3 July 2020), p. 033008. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevResearch.2.033008 . url: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevResearch.2.033008

    work page doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.033008 2020

  4. [3]

    Phase locking of lasers with Gaussian coupling

    Andra Naresh Kumar Reddy et al. “Phase locking of lasers with Gaussian coupling”. In: Opt. Express 30.2 (Jan. 2022), pp. 1114–1129. doi: 10.1364/OE.439957. url: https://opg.optica.org/oe/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-30-2-1114

    work page doi:10.1364/oe.439957 2022

  5. [4]

    Phase locking of nanosecond pulses in a passively Q-switched two-element fiber laser array

    Fanting Kong et al. “Phase locking of nanosecond pulses in a passively Q-switched two-element fiber laser array”. In: Applied Physics Letters 90.15 (2007), p. 151110. doi: 10.1063/1.2721390 . url: https://doi.org/10.1063/1. 2721390

    work page doi:10.1063/1.2721390 2007

  6. [5]

    Improved Phase Locking of Laser Arrays with Nonlinear Coupling

    Simon Mahler et al. “Improved Phase Locking of Laser Arrays with Nonlinear Coupling”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 124 (13 Apr. 2020), p. 133901. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.124.133901 . url: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.124.133901

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.124.133901 2020

  7. [6]

    Observing Geometric Frustration with Thousands of Coupled Lasers

    Micha Nixon et al. “Observing Geometric Frustration with Thousands of Coupled Lasers”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 (18 May 2013), p. 184102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.184102 . url: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.110.184102

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.110.184102 2013

  8. [7]

    Simulating the classical XY model with a laser network

    Shuhei Tamate et al. “Simulating the classical XY model with a laser network”. In: arXiv:1608.00358 (2016)

    arXiv 2016

Show all 84 references
  1. [8]

    Realizing the classical XY Hamiltonian in polariton simulators

    Natalia G. Berloff et al. “Realizing the classical XY Hamiltonian in polariton simulators”. In: Nature Materials 16 (Sept. 2017). Article, p. 1120. url: https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4971. 23

    2017 doi

  2. [9]

    Programmable all optical spin simulator with artificial gauge fields

    Simon Mahler et al. Programmable all optical spin simulator with artificial gauge fields . 2024. arXiv: 2408 . 13865 [physics.optics]. url: https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.13865

    2024 arXiv

  3. [10]

    Network of time-multiplexed optical parametric oscillators as a coherent Ising machine

    Alireza Marandi et al. “Network of time-multiplexed optical parametric oscillators as a coherent Ising machine”. In: Nature Photonics 8 (Oct. 2014), p. 937. url: https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2014.249

    2014 doi

  4. [11]

    Observing Dissipative Topological Defects with Coupled Lasers

    Vishwa Pal et al. “Observing Dissipative Topological Defects with Coupled Lasers”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 119 (1 July 2017), p. 013902. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.119.013902. url: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett. 119.013902

    2017 doi

  5. [12]

    Dynamics of dissipative topological defects in coupled phase oscillators

    Simon Mahler et al. “Dynamics of dissipative topological defects in coupled phase oscillators”. In: Journal of Physics B: Atomic, Molecular and Optical Physics 52.20 (Sept. 2019), p. 205401. doi: 10.1088/1361-6455/ab3d00

    2019 doi

  6. [14]

    Rapid laser solver for the phase retrieval problem

    C. Tradonsky et al. “Rapid laser solver for the phase retrieval problem”. In: Science Advances 5.10 (2019). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aax4530

    2019 doi

  7. [15]

    Loss Enhanced Phase Locking in Coupled Oscillators

    Vardit Eckhouse et al. “Loss Enhanced Phase Locking in Coupled Oscillators”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 100 (2 Jan. 2008), p. 024102. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.024102. url: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.100. 024102

    2008 doi

  8. [16]

    Chandler

    D. Chandler. Introduction to Modern Statistical Mechanics . Oxford University Press, Sept. 1987, p. 288

    1987

  9. [17]

    Laser-phase transition analogy: Application to first-order transitions

    J.F. Scott, M. Sargent, and C.D. Cantrell. “Laser-phase transition analogy: Application to first-order transitions”. In: Optics Communications 15.1 (1975), pp. 13–16. issn: 0030-4018. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0030- 4018(75) 90171-6. url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...

    1975

  10. [18]

    Laser-phase transition analogy: II

    J.C. Goldstein, M.O. Scully, and P.A. Lee. “Laser-phase transition analogy: II”. In: Physics Letters A 35.5 (1971), pp. 317–319. issn: 0375-9601. doi: https : / / doi . org / 10 . 1016 / 0375 - 9601(71 ) 90713 - 4. url: http : / / www . sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/03...

    1971

  11. [19]

    LEV DA VIDOVICH LANDAU (1908–1968)

    E M Lifshitz. “LEV DA VIDOVICH LANDAU (1908–1968)”. In: Soviet Physics Uspekhi 12.1 (1969), p. 135. url: http://stacks.iop.org/0038-5670/12/i=1/a=A09

    1969

  12. [20]

    Phase transition in crowd synchrony of delay-coupled multilayer laser networks

    Elad Cohen, Michael Rosenbluh, and Ido Kanter. “Phase transition in crowd synchrony of delay-coupled multilayer laser networks”. In: Opt. Express 20.18 (Aug. 2012), pp. 19683–19689. doi: 10 . 1364 / OE . 20 . 019683. url: http : //www.opticsexpress.org/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-20-18-19683

    2012

  13. [21]

    Crowd Synchrony and Quorum Sensing in Delay-Coupled Lasers

    Jordi Zamora-Munt et al. “Crowd Synchrony and Quorum Sensing in Delay-Coupled Lasers”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 105 (26 Dec. 2010), p. 264101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.264101 . url: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevLett.105.264101

    2010 doi

  14. [22]

    Coupling of laser arrays with intracavity elements in the far-field

    Simon Mahler et al. “Coupling of laser arrays with intracavity elements in the far-field”. In: OSA Continuum 2.6 (June 2019), pp. 2077–2084. doi: 10.1364/OSAC.2.002077 . url: http://www.osapublishing.org/osac/abstract.cfm? URI=osac-2-6-2077

    2019 doi

  15. [23]

    Spatiotemporal supermodes: Rapid reduction of spatial coherence in highly multimode lasers

    Ronen Chriki et al. “Spatiotemporal supermodes: Rapid reduction of spatial coherence in highly multimode lasers”. In: Phys. Rev. A 98 (2 Aug. 2018), p. 023812. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.98.023812 . url: https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevA.98.023812

    2018 doi

  16. [24]

    Fast laser speckle suppression with an intracavity diffuser

    Simon Mahler et al. “Fast laser speckle suppression with an intracavity diffuser”. In: Nanophotonics 10.1 (2021), pp. 129–136. doi: doi:10.1515/nanoph-2020-0390. url: https://doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2020-0390

    2021 doi

  17. [25]

    Controlling Nonlinear Interaction in a Many-Mode Laser by Tuning Disorder

    Yaniv Eliezer et al. “Controlling Nonlinear Interaction in a Many-Mode Laser by Tuning Disorder”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 128 (14 Apr. 2022), p. 143901. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.143901. url: https://link.aps.org/doi/10. 1103/PhysRevLett.128.143901. 24

    2022 doi

  18. [26]

    Complex lasers with controllable coherence

    Hui Cao et al. “Complex lasers with controllable coherence”. In: Nature Reviews Physics 1.2 (2019), pp. 156–168. issn: 2522-5820. doi: 10.1038/s42254-018-0010-6 . url: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42254-018-0010-6

    2019 doi

  19. [27]

    High-resolution digital spatial control of a highly multimode laser

    Chene Tradonsky et al. “High-resolution digital spatial control of a highly multimode laser”. In: Optica 8.6 (June 2021), pp. 880–884. doi: 10.1364/OPTICA.423140 . url: http://www.osapublishing.org/optica/abstract.cfm?URI= optica-8-6-880

    2021 doi

  20. [28]

    Roadmap on multimode light shaping

    Marco Piccardo et al. “Roadmap on multimode light shaping”. In: Journal of Optics 24.1 (Dec. 2021), p. 013001. doi: 10.1088/2040-8986/ac3a9d. url: https://dx.doi.org/10.1088/2040-8986/ac3a9d

    2021 doi

  21. [29]

    Complex-Light Lasers

    Nir Davidson and Andrew Forbes. “Complex-Light Lasers”. eng. In: Optics and photonics news 33.5 (2022), p. 8. issn: 1047-6938. doi: 10.1364/OPN.33.5.000026

    2022 doi

  22. [30]

    Real-time full-field imaging through scattering media by all-optical feedback

    Ronen Chriki et al. “Real-time full-field imaging through scattering media by all-optical feedback”. In: Phys. Rev. A 105 (3 Mar. 2022), p. 033527. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.105.033527 . url: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevA.105.033527

    2022 doi

  23. [31]

    Degenerate Optical Cavities

    J. A. Arnaud. “Degenerate Optical Cavities”. In: Appl. Opt. 8.1 (Jan. 1969), pp. 189–196. doi: 10.1364/AO.8.000189. url: http://ao.osa.org/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-8-1-189

    1969 doi

  24. [32]

    Efficient method for controlling the spatial coherence of a laser

    M. Nixon et al. “Efficient method for controlling the spatial coherence of a laser”. In: Opt. Lett. 38.19 (Oct. 2013), pp. 3858–3861. doi: 10.1364/OL.38.003858. url: http://ol.osa.org/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-38-19-3858

    2013 doi

  25. [33]

    Talbot diffraction and Fourier filtering for phase locking an array of lasers

    Chene Tradonsky et al. “Talbot diffraction and Fourier filtering for phase locking an array of lasers”. In: Appl. Opt. 56.1 (Jan. 2017), A126–A132. doi: 10.1364/AO.56.00A126. url: http://ao.osa.org/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-56-1-A126

    2017 doi

  26. [34]

    Controlling Synchronization in Large Laser Networks

    Micha Nixon et al. “Controlling Synchronization in Large Laser Networks”. In: Phys. Rev. Lett. 108 (21 May 2012), p. 214101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.214101. url: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.108. 214101

    2012 doi

  27. [35]

    Real-time wavefront shaping through scattering media by all-optical feedback

    Micha Nixon et al. “Real-time wavefront shaping through scattering media by all-optical feedback”. In: Nature Photonics 7 (Oct. 2013). Article, p. 919. url: https://doi.org/10.1038/nphoton.2013.248

    2013 doi

  28. [36]

    Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbulence

    Yoshiki Kuramoto. Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbulence. Dover Ed: Dover Publications, 1984.isbn: 9780486428819

    1984

  29. [37]

    Kuramoto

    Y. Kuramoto. Chemical Oscillations, Waves, and Turbulence . Dover Books on Chemistry Series. Dover Publications,

  30. [38]

    A practical algorithm for the determination of the phase from image and diffraction plane pictures

    R. W. Gerchberg and W. O. Saxton. “A practical algorithm for the determination of the phase from image and diffraction plane pictures”. In: Optik 35.2 (1972), pp. 237–246

    1972

  31. [39]

    Lens Design for Optical Fourier Transform Systems

    K. von Bieren. “Lens Design for Optical Fourier Transform Systems”. In: Appl. Opt. 10.12 (Dec. 1971), pp. 2739–2742. doi: 10.1364/AO.10.002739. url: http://ao.osa.org/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-10-12-2739

    1971 doi

  32. [40]

    Phase locking of a two-dimensional laser array by controlling the far-field pattern

    Yi Zhou et al. “Phase locking of a two-dimensional laser array by controlling the far-field pattern”. In: Applied Physics Letters 84.16 (2004), pp. 3025–3027. doi: 10.1063/1.1699448. url: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.1699448

    2004 doi

  33. [41]

    Experimental study of cophasing dynamics in passive coherent combining of fiber lasers

    J. Guillot et al. “Experimental study of cophasing dynamics in passive coherent combining of fiber lasers”. In: Opt. Lett. 36.15 (Aug. 2011), pp. 2907–2909. doi: 10.1364/OL.36.002907 . url: http://ol.osa.org/abstract.cfm?URI=ol- 36-15-2907

    2011 doi

  34. [42]

    Dynamics of Passively Phased Ring Oscillator Fiber Laser Arrays

    S. Sivaramakrishnan et al. “Dynamics of Passively Phased Ring Oscillator Fiber Laser Arrays”. In: IEEE Journal of Quantum Electronics 51.8 (Aug. 2015), pp. 1–9. issn: 0018-9197. doi: 10.1109/JQE.2015.2449310

    2015

  35. [43]

    Hidden order in a frustrated system: Properties of the Heisenberg Kagom´ e antiferromagnet

    J. T. Chalker, P. C. W. Holdsworth, and E. F. Shender. “Hidden order in a frustrated system: Properties of the Heisenberg Kagom´ e antiferromagnet”. In:Phys. Rev. Lett. 68 (6 Feb. 1992), pp. 855–858. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett. 68.855. url: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysR...

    1992 doi

  36. [44]

    Coherent addition of fiber lasers by use of a fiber coupler

    Akira Shirakawa et al. “Coherent addition of fiber lasers by use of a fiber coupler”. In: Opt. Express 10.21 (Oct. 2002), pp. 1167–1172. doi: 10.1364/OE.10.001167. url: http://www.opticsexpress.org/abstract.cfm?URI=oe-10-21- 1167. 25

    2002 doi

  37. [45]

    Efficient coherent addition of fiber lasers in free space

    Moti Fridman et al. “Efficient coherent addition of fiber lasers in free space”. In: Opt. Lett. 32.7 (Apr. 2007), pp. 790–

    2007

  38. [46]

    Watt-range, coherent, uniphase powers from phase-locked arrays of antiguided diode lasers

    D. Botez et al. “Watt-range, coherent, uniphase powers from phase-locked arrays of antiguided diode lasers”. In: Applied Physics Letters 58.19 (1991), pp. 2070–2072. doi: 10.1063/1.105013. eprint: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.105013 . url: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.105013

    1991 doi

  39. [47]

    Passive phase locking of 25 fiber lasers

    Moti Fridman et al. “Passive phase locking of 25 fiber lasers”. In: Opt. Lett. 35.9 (May 2010), pp. 1434–1436. doi: 10.1364/OL.35.001434. url: http://ol.osa.org/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-35-9-1434

    2010 doi

  40. [48]

    Coherent operation of an array of diode lasers using a spatial filter in a Talbot cavity

    F. X. D’Amato, E. T. Siebert, and C. Roychoudhuri. “Coherent operation of an array of diode lasers using a spatial filter in a Talbot cavity”. In: Applied Physics Letters 55.9 (1989), pp. 816–818. doi: 10 . 1063 / 1 . 101768. eprint: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.101768. url: http...

    1989 doi

  41. [49]

    Diffractive-optics-based beam combination of a phase-locked fiber laser array

    Eric C. Cheung et al. “Diffractive-optics-based beam combination of a phase-locked fiber laser array”. In: Opt. Lett. 33.4 (Feb. 2008), pp. 354–356. doi: 10.1364/OL.33.000354. url: http://ol.osa.org/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-33-4-354

    2008 doi

  42. [50]

    An Analysis of Saturable Absorbers

    Michael Hercher. “An Analysis of Saturable Absorbers”. In: Appl. Opt. 6.5 (May 1967), pp. 947–954. doi: 10.1364/ AO.6.000947. url: http://ao.osa.org/abstract.cfm?URI=ao-6-5-947

    1967

  43. [51]

    Anthony E. Siegman. Lasers. 1st ed. Vol. 1. 1. Mill Valey, California: University Science Books, Jan. 1986. isbn: 3257227892

    1986

  44. [52]

    Dissipatively coupled waveguide networks for coherent diffusive photonics

    Sebabrata Mukherjee et al. “Dissipatively coupled waveguide networks for coherent diffusive photonics”. In: Nature Communications 8.1 (Dec. 2017), p. 1909. issn: 2041-1723. doi: 10 . 1038 / s41467 - 017 - 02048 - 4. url: https : //doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-02048-4

    2017 doi

  45. [53]

    Topological dissipation in a time-multiplexed photonic resonator network

    Christian Leefmans et al. “Topological dissipation in a time-multiplexed photonic resonator network”. In: Nature Physics 18.4 (Apr. 2022), pp. 442–449. issn: 1745-2481. doi: 10.1038/s41567-021-01492-w . url: https://doi.org/ 10.1038/s41567-021-01492-w

    2022 doi

  46. [54]

    Dispersive versus Dissipative Coupling for Frequency Synchronization in Lasers

    Jiajie Ding et al. “Dispersive versus Dissipative Coupling for Frequency Synchronization in Lasers”. In: Phys. Rev. Applied 12 (5 Nov. 2019), p. 054039. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.054039. url: https://link.aps.org/doi/ 10.1103/PhysRevApplied.12.054039

    2019 doi

  47. [55]

    The London Millennium Footbridge

    P. Dallard et al. “The London Millennium Footbridge”. In: The Structural Engineer 79 (Nov. 2001), pp. 17–33

    2001

  48. [56]

    Crowd synchrony on the Millennium Bridge

    Steven H. Strogatz et al. “Crowd synchrony on the Millennium Bridge”. In: Nature 438.7064 (2005), pp. 43–44. issn: 1476-4687. doi: 10.1038/438043a. url: https://doi.org/10.1038/438043a

    2005 doi

  49. [57]

    Modeling walker synchronization on the Millennium Bridge

    Bruno Eckhardt et al. “Modeling walker synchronization on the Millennium Bridge”. In: Phys. Rev. E 75 (2 Feb. 2007), p. 021110. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.75.021110. url: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevE.75.021110

    2007 doi

  50. [58]

    Introduction to percolation theory

    Dietrich Stauffer and Amnon Aharony. Introduction to percolation theory. 2nd ed. Vol. 2nd edition. Taylor and Francis,

  51. [59]

    The Kuramoto model: A simple paradigm for synchronization phenomena

    Juan A. Acebr´ on et al. “The Kuramoto model: A simple paradigm for synchronization phenomena”. In: Rev. Mod. Phys. 77 (1 Apr. 2005), pp. 137–185. doi: 10.1103/RevModPhys.77.137. url: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ RevModPhys.77.137

    2005 doi

  52. [60]

    Universality of phase transition dynamics: Topological defects from symmetry break- ing

    A. D. Campo and W. H. Zurek. “Universality of phase transition dynamics: Topological defects from symmetry break- ing”. In: Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 29 (2014), p. 1430018

    2014

  53. [61]

    The topological theory of defects in ordered media

    N. D. Mermin. “The topological theory of defects in ordered media”. In: Rev. Mod. Phys. 51 (1979), p. 591

    1979

  54. [62]

    Optical vortices

    P. Coullet, L. Gil, and F. Rocca. “Optical vortices”. In: Opt. Commun. 73 (1989), p. 403

    1989

  55. [63]

    Topology of cosmic domains and strings

    T W B Kibble. “Topology of cosmic domains and strings”. In: Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and General 9.8 (1976), p. 1387. url: http://stacks.iop.org/0305-4470/9/i=8/a=029

    1976

  56. [64]

    Cosmological experiments in superfluid helium?

    W. H. Zurek. “Cosmological experiments in superfluid helium?” In: Nature 317 (1985), p. 505. 26

    1985

  57. [65]

    Critical dynamics of spontaneous symmetry breaking in a homogeneous Bose gas

    Nir Navon et al. “Critical dynamics of spontaneous symmetry breaking in a homogeneous Bose gas”. In: Science 347.6218 (2015), pp. 167–170. issn: 0036-8075. doi: 10.1126/science.1258676. url: http://science.sciencemag. org/content/347/6218/167

    2015 doi

  58. [66]

    Artificial gauge field for photons in coupled cavity arrays

    R. O. Umucal ılar and I. Carusotto. “Artificial gauge field for photons in coupled cavity arrays”. In: Phys. Rev. A 84 (4 Oct. 2011), p. 043804. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.84.043804 . url: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevA. 84.043804

    2011 doi

  59. [67]

    Energy levels and wave functions of Bloch electrons in rational and irrational magnetic fields

    Douglas R. Hofstadter. “Energy levels and wave functions of Bloch electrons in rational and irrational magnetic fields”. In: Phys. Rev. B 14 (6 Sept. 1976), pp. 2239–2249. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevB.14.2239. url: https://link.aps.org/ doi/10.1103/PhysRevB.14.2239

    1976 doi

  60. [68]

    The General Motion of Conduction Electrons in a Uniform Magnetic Field, with Application to the Diamagnetism of Metals

    P G Harper. “The General Motion of Conduction Electrons in a Uniform Magnetic Field, with Application to the Diamagnetism of Metals”. In: Proceedings of the Physical Society. Section A 68.10 (Oct. 1955), pp. 879–892. doi: 10.1088/0370-1298/68/10/305. url: https://doi.org/10.10...

    1955 doi

  61. [69]

    Topological photonics

    Tomoki Ozawa et al. “Topological photonics”. In: Rev. Mod. Phys. 91 (1 Mar. 2019), p. 015006. doi: 10 . 1103 / RevModPhys.91.015006. url: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/RevModPhys.91.015006

    2019 doi

  62. [70]

    A digital laser for on-demand laser modes

    Sandile Ngcobo et al. “A digital laser for on-demand laser modes”. In: Nature Communications 4.1 (Aug. 2013), p. 2289. issn: 2041-1723. doi: 10.1038/ncomms3289. url: https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms3289

    2013 doi

  63. [71]

    Highly integrated optical phased arrays: photonic integrated circuits for optical beam shaping and beam steering

    Martijn J.R. Heck. “Highly integrated optical phased arrays: photonic integrated circuits for optical beam shaping and beam steering”. In: Nanophotonics 6.1 (2017), pp. 93–107. doi: doi:10.1515/nanoph-2015-0152 . url: https: //doi.org/10.1515/nanoph-2015-0152

    2017 doi

  64. [72]

    Large two-dimensional arrays of phase-locked vertical cavity surface emitting lasers

    M. Orenstein et al. “Large two-dimensional arrays of phase-locked vertical cavity surface emitting lasers”. In: Applied Physics Letters 60.13 (1992), pp. 1535–1537. doi: 10.1063/1.107243. eprint: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.107243 . url: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.107243

    1992 doi

  65. [73]

    Non-invasive laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) of extra-embryonic blood vessels in intact avian eggs at early developmental stages

    Zhenyu Dong et al. “Non-invasive laser speckle contrast imaging (LSCI) of extra-embryonic blood vessels in intact avian eggs at early developmental stages”. In: Biomed. Opt. Express 15.8 (Aug. 2024), pp. 4605–4624. doi: 10.1364/ BOE.530366. url: https://opg.optica.org/boe/abst...

    2024

  66. [74]

    Compact and cost-effective laser-powered speckle contrast optical spectroscopy fiber-free device for measuring cerebral blood flow

    Yu Xi Huang et al. “Compact and cost-effective laser-powered speckle contrast optical spectroscopy fiber-free device for measuring cerebral blood flow”. In: Journal of Biomedical Optics 29.6 (2024), p. 067001. doi: 10.1117/1.JBO.29. 6.067001. url: https://doi.org/10.1117/1.JBO...

    2024 doi

  67. [75]

    Simon Mahler et al. “Assessing depth sensitivity in laser interferometry speckle visibility spectroscopy (iSVS) through source-to-detector distance variation and cerebral blood flow monitoring in humans and rabbits”. In: Biomed. Opt. Express 14.9 (Sept. 2023), pp. 4964–4978. d...

    2023 doi

  68. [76]

    Experimental demonstration of an efficient number diagnostic for long ion chains

    M. R. Kamsap et al. “Experimental demonstration of an efficient number diagnostic for long ion chains”. In: Phys. Rev. A 95 (1 Jan. 2017), p. 013413. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevA.95.013413. url: https://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/ PhysRevA.95.013413

    2017 doi

  69. [77]

    Flat-top laser beams over an extended range

    Andra Naresh Kumar Reddy et al. “Flat-top laser beams over an extended range”. In: Journal of Physics: Conference Series 1410.1 (Dec. 2019), p. 012126. doi: 10.1088/1742- 6596/1410/1/012126 . url: https://dx.doi.org/10. 1088/1742-6596/1410/1/012126

    2019 doi

  70. [78]

    Yu Xi Huang et al. “Interferometric speckle visibility spectroscopy (iSVS) for measuring decorrelation time and dynamics of moving samples with enhanced signal-to-noise ratio and relaxed reference requirements”. In:Opt. Express 31.19 (Sept. 2023), pp. 31253–31266. doi: 10.1364...

    2023 doi

  71. [79]

    AI-guided histopathology predicts brain metastasis in lung cancer patients

    Haowen Zhou et al. “AI-guided histopathology predicts brain metastasis in lung cancer patients”. In: The Journal of Pathology 263.1 (2024), pp. 89–98. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/path.6263 . eprint: https://pathsocjournals. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/path.6263. u...

    2024 doi

  72. [80]

    Correlating stroke risk with non-invasive cerebrovascular perfusion dynamics using a portable speckle contrast optical spectroscopy laser device

    Yu Xi Huang et al. “Correlating stroke risk with non-invasive cerebrovascular perfusion dynamics using a portable speckle contrast optical spectroscopy laser device”. In: Biomed. Opt. Express 15.10 (Nov. 2024), pp. 6083–6097. doi: 10.1364/BOE.534796. url: https://opg.optica.or...

    2024 doi

  73. [81]

    Portable six-channel laser speckle system for simultaneous measurement of cerebral blood flow and volume with potential applications in characterization of brain injury

    Simon Mahler et al. “Portable six-channel laser speckle system for simultaneous measurement of cerebral blood flow and volume with potential applications in characterization of brain injury”. In: Neurophotonics 12.1 (2025), p. 015003. doi: 10.1117/1.NPh.12.1.015003. url: https...

    2025 doi

  74. [82]

    Automated non-invasive laser speckle imaging of the chick heart rate and extraembryonic blood vessels and their response to Nifedipine and Amlodipine drugs

    Carol Readhead et al. “Automated non-invasive laser speckle imaging of the chick heart rate and extraembryonic blood vessels and their response to Nifedipine and Amlodipine drugs”. In: Developmental Biology 519 (2025), pp. 46–54. issn: 0012-1606. doi: https : / / doi . org / 1...

    2025

  75. [792]

    url: http://ol.osa.org/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-32-7-790

    doi: 10.1364/OL.32.000790. url: http://ol.osa.org/abstract.cfm?URI=ol-32-7-790

    doi

  76. [2003]

    url: http://books.google.de/books?id=4ADt7smO5Q8C

    isbn: 9780486428819. url: http://books.google.de/books?id=4ADt7smO5Q8C

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.