Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 9 minor 1 cited by

Potential Nitrogen Enrichment via Direct-Collapse Wolf-Rayet Stars in a $z=4.7$ Star-Forming Galaxy

T0 review · 5 major / 9 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper reports that the $z=4.6928$ star-forming galaxy ID60001 has a nitrogen excess, $\log(\mathrm{N/O})=-0.76$, and argues that the excess comes from massive Wolf-Rayet stars that collapse directly to black holes before they can…

desk verdict The N/O excess is defensible and the Cloudy density result is useful, but the direct-collapse Wolf-Rayet story leans on one barely resolved He II line and an undetected blue bump; it deserves review with revisions. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.04817 v1 pith:HGRLZY4Z submitted 2025-02-07 astro-ph.GA

Yechi Zhang , Takahiro Morishita , Massimo Stiavelli This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords nitrogen-to-oxygenratioWolf-RayetstarsdirectcollapseblackholesJWSTNIRSpecspectroscopyhigh-redshiftgalaxieschemicalabundancesHeII4686emissionelectrondensity
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Using JWST/NIRSpec optical spectroscopy of the galaxy ID60001 at $z=4.6928$, the paper measures $\log(\mathrm{N/O})=-0.76$ at a low gas-phase metallicity of $12+\log(\mathrm{O/H})=7.75$, a value well above the local N/O--metallicity relation. The authors compare three enrichment scenarios and find that pristine-gas infall and oxygen depletion by Type II supernova winds are disfavored, leaving nitrogen-rich winds from massive Wolf-Rayet stars as the preferred explanation. In their picture, stars heavier than about 25 solar masses go through a Wolf-Rayet phase at low metallicity and then collapse directly into black holes, so nitrogen is added to the interstellar medium without the later supernova oxygen injection that would erase the excess. If correct, the result shows that one ordinary stellar channel can explain the nitrogen-rich galaxies seen in the early universe, and it highlights a practical caveat: optical N/O measurements are sensitive to the assumed electron density.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is the direct-collapse Wolf-Rayet channel: in low-metallicity stellar populations, stars more massive than about 25 solar masses pass through a Wolf-Rayet phase in which nitrogen-rich winds eject newly synthesized nitrogen into the ISM, and then collapse directly to black holes instead of exploding as core-collapse supernovae, so no compensating oxygen is added and the N/O ratio stays elevated for roughly 10 Myr. Observationally, the channel is recognized through a set of tracers: the moderately broad He II $\lambda4686$ emission line from WR winds (FWHM about 410 km s$^{-1}$, EW$_0$ 6.7 angstroms), the broad/outflow components in H$\beta$, [O III], and H$\alpha$ that the authors attribute to stellar winds, the clumpy emission-line morphology seen in broadband continuum-subtracted images, and the absence of AGN signatures in BPT, VO87, and He2-N2 diagnostics. On the abundance side, the N/O ratio is obtained from [N II] $\lambda6584$ and [O II], [O III] with an ionization correction factor, using electron temperature from [O III] $\lambda4363/5007$ and electron density from [S II] $\lambda6716/6731$; the paper's photoionization models show that these optical N/O diagnostics shift by about 0.2 dex if the density is wrong.

What would settle it

A decisive test would be a deep rest-frame ultraviolet and X-ray/mid-infrared observation of ID60001: a stellar origin predicts the [Fe III] $\lambda4658$ blue bump accompanying He II $\lambda4686$ and no X-ray or [Ne V] excess, while detection of AGN indicators would break the Wolf-Rayet attribution. Alternatively, a measurement placing the electron density of the N$^+$ zone above a few thousand cm$^{-3}$ would shift the optical N/O estimate by about 0.2 dex and could erase the claimed excess.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery, stated on the paper's own terms, is that ID60001 is a star-forming galaxy whose interstellar medium carries a real nitrogen overabundance: $\log(\mathrm{N/O})=-0.76\pm0.03$ at $12+\log(\mathrm{O/H})=7.75\pm0.01$, about $0.1$ dex above the local relation at the same metallicity. The evidence assembled for the Wolf-Rayet origin is multi-wavelength: a moderately broad He II $\lambda4686$ line (FWHM $\approx410$ km s$^{-1}$, rest-frame equivalent width 6.7 angstroms) consistent with stellar winds, no AGN signatures in four optical emission-line diagnostics, a very young stellar population ($\log(\mathrm{age/yr}) \le 6.8$), and spatially extended, turbulent ionized gas with outflow features in H$\beta$, [O III], and H$\alpha$. The authors conclude that massive ($>25\,M_\odot$) Wolf-Rayet stars at low metallicity, which collapse directly to black holes without a core-collapse supernova, are the most likely source of the nitrogen enrichment. They also find that had the electron density been assumed rather than measured, the optical N/O value could shift by roughly $0.2$ dex, which would change the classification of many high-redshift galaxies.

Load-bearing premise

The argument assumes the moderately broad helium emission line at 4686 angstroms comes from winds of very massive young stars rather than from an active black hole at the galaxy's center; observations that could rule out an active nucleus are not yet available, and the supporting iron emission features normally seen with such stellar winds are not detected.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • ID60001 provides a rest-frame optical measurement of elevated N/O at $z>4$, placing at least one nitrogen-rich galaxy on the same abundance scale as local calibrations rather than on the UV-line scale used for most earlier detections.
  • If direct-collapse Wolf-Rayet stars are responsible, the N/O excess is naturally long-lived (about 10 Myr), so the galaxy does not require a finely tuned or intermittent star-formation history.
  • The scenario offers a non-exotic stellar explanation for nitrogen-rich galaxies at low metallicity, reducing the need to invoke very massive or supermassive stars in every case.
  • Reliable electron density measurements become a prerequisite for optical N/O abundance work; without them, derived N/O values can be off by about 0.2 dex.
  • Future observations that cover both UV and optical nitrogen lines, together with carbon lines, can test which enrichment mechanism operates in other high-redshift galaxies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper, if the direct-collapse WR channel is common in low-metallicity dwarfs, the apparent abundance of nitrogen-rich galaxies at high redshift may be partly a phase-selection effect: rest-frame optical surveys catch galaxies during the brief ~10 Myr window while the WR winds are visible, biasing the reported N/O distribution upward.
  • Beyond the paper, the density sensitivity quantified here implies that N/O values derived from UV and optical lines cannot be compared directly without a common density assumption; re-deriving published z>4 N/O measurements with consistent electron densities could change which galaxies are classified as nitrogen-enhanced.
  • Beyond the paper, a testable prediction is that N-rich galaxies attributed to this channel should show the [Fe III] $\lambda4658$ blue bump and broader He II $\lambda4686$ in deeper spectra, and should lack X-ray and mid-infrared AGN signatures; observing the small known sample of N-rich galaxies would determine how often this channel operates.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 9 minor

Summary. The paper presents JWST/NIRSpec MSA spectroscopy and NIRCam photometry of ID60001, a star-forming galaxy at z=4.6928. From rest-frame optical emission lines, the authors derive Te([OIII]) ~ 1.6-1.7 x 10^4 K, ne ~ 350 cm^-3, 12+log(O/H) = 7.75, and log(N/O) = -0.76, and argue that the N/O ratio is elevated relative to local galaxies at comparable metallicity. After using optical diagnostic diagrams to argue against an AGN, they attribute the nitrogen enhancement to massive (>25 solar masses) Wolf-Rayet stars that directly collapse to black holes, based on a moderately broad He II lambda4686 line, broad H-alpha and outflow components, and a young stellar age from SED fitting. They also use Cloudy models to argue that optical N/O diagnostics are sensitive to gas density.

Significance. If the abundance measurement and the WR interpretation hold, this is a valuable data point for nitrogen enrichment channels at z>4, particularly because it uses rest-frame optical lines rather than the UV lines used for most high-z N-rich galaxies. The paper is careful in its line decomposition, uses Te-based abundances, applies multiple AGN diagnostics, and provides a useful demonstration with Cloudy that optical N/O diagnostics depend on electron density. The main weakness is that the conclusion rests heavily on the interpretation of He II lambda4686 as a stellar-wind feature; this is currently under-supported, and the authors themselves note the absence of the WR blue bump and the need for X-ray, UV, and mid-IR data.

major comments (5)
  1. [Section 5.1 and Table 1] The WR scenario stands on the claim that He II lambda4686 is a moderately broad stellar-wind line with FWHM=410 km/s, but Table 1 gives only flux and EW0 for this line; no FWHM, its uncertainty, or an LSF-deconvolved width is reported. At the G235M resolution (~300 km/s at 4686 Å), 410 km/s is only marginally resolved and could be a narrow nebular He II line convolved with the LSF. Please provide a two-component fit (narrow plus broad) with a BIC comparison, or at least an LSF-removed width with a confidence interval. This is load-bearing because it is the only direct spectroscopic evidence for WR stars, and the authors state in Section 5.1 that the WR blue-bump lines, including [Fe III] lambda4658, are not detected.
  2. [Section 3.3] The choice A(V)=0.0 is derived using narrow Balmer components, while the authors note that using total H-alpha fluxes gives A(V)=1.09 (Stiavelli et al. 2024). The decomposition into narrow, outflow, and broad components is therefore load-bearing for the extinction correction, yet no systematic error from this choice is propagated into the quoted abundances. Please report how 12+log(O/H) and log(N/O) change for A(V)=0.5 and 1.0 under the SMC and Calzetti extinction laws, and include this in the error budget.
  3. [Section 3.5 and Table 2] The quoted uncertainties on 12+log(O/H) (given as +/-0.01 in the abstract but +/-0.03 in Table 2) and log(N/O) of +/-0.03 are random fitting errors only; they exclude ICF uncertainties (including the log(ICF)=0.09 correction for N/O), the assumed Te for Balmer emissivity, density systematics, and extinction. Please state explicitly which terms are included in the error bars and provide a systematic-error estimate. As written, the formal significance of the N/O enhancement is not established.
  4. [Section 5.1] The claim that the N/O ratio is 'significantly elevated' would be strengthened by quantifying the offset from the local N/O-O/H relation in units of its intrinsic scatter. With [N/O]=0.10 relative to solar and typical local scatter of order 0.15-0.2 dex in log(N/O) at fixed O/H, the excess may be marginal once the systematics above are included. Please report the offset (e.g., Delta log(N/O) at fixed O/H) and the scatter of the comparison sample.
  5. [Section 4.1] The SED fit uses Gaussian priors centered on the spectroscopically inferred A(V), log U, and metallicity, and the resulting young age/SFH is then used in Section 5.1 as support for the WR scenario. This is not circular for the abundance measurement, but the age constraint is not fully independent of the spectroscopic ISM properties. Please show how the SFR and age posteriors change if the priors are broadened or removed.
minor comments (9)
  1. [Table 1] The flux unit is given as 10^-19 erg s^-1 cm^-3; it should be erg s^-1 cm^-2.
  2. [Section 3.4 and Table 2] Te([OIII]) is reported as (1.69 +/- 0.03) x 10^4 K in Section 3.4 but (1.61 +/- 0.04) x 10^4 K in Table 2; please unify and specify which value is used for the abundance derivation.
  3. [Abstract and Table 2] The abstract states 12+log(O/H)=7.75 +/- 0.01 while Table 2 gives 7.75 +/- 0.03; the quoted uncertainty should be consistent throughout.
  4. [Section 3.3] There is a typo: 'resonable' should be 'reasonable'.
  5. [Section 2.2] The text contains 'NIRSPec MSA'; this should be 'NIRSpec MSA'.
  6. [Section 5.1] The comparison of EW0(H-alpha)=800 Å with STARBURST99 ages should state which stellar population synthesis parameters (IMF, metallicity, SFH) are used and whether the narrow-component EW was adopted.
  7. [Figure 7] The caption lists line styles for nH=100, 400, 2000, and 20000 cm^-3, but the text refers to 'nH=2000' and 'nH=20000' grids in a way that is easy to confuse; please check that the colors and line styles in the figure match the caption.
  8. [Title] The title has a spacing issue: 'W olf-Rayet' should be 'Wolf-Rayet'.
  9. [Section 6] There is a typo: 'prinstine gas infall' should be 'pristine gas infall'.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the N/O abundance is measured from observed optical line ratios with literature ICFs, and the WR/direct-collapse interpretation is a separate, independent argument rather than a fitted or self-referential prediction.

full rationale

The central abundance claim, log(N/O) = -0.76 at 12+log(O/H) = 7.75, is derived from directly measured emission-line fluxes ([N II] λ6548, [O II], [O III], [S II]) using PyNeb with Te([O III]) and ne([S II]) determined from observed line ratios, then converted to element abundances using literature ICFs (Izotov et al. 2006; Amayo et al. 2021). No parameter in this chain is fitted to match the claimed N/O value, and the measurement does not depend on the WR hypothesis. The WR/direct-collapse attribution is presented as an interpretation supported by independent observables: a moderately broad He II λ4686 line, EW0(Hα)-based young stellar age, outflow/turbulence signatures, and galaxy morphology. None of these is constructed from the N/O target value. The SED fitting does use Gaussian priors centered on spectroscopically inferred A_V, log U, and metallicity, but the paper does not use the SED to re-derive or validate N/O; the host properties are ancillary and the stellar-age argument is based on EW0(Hα) compared with STARBURST99, not on the SED. Self-citations to Stiavelli et al. (2024) and Morishita et al. (2024a,c) provide empirical context and comparison relations, but they are not invoked as unverified uniqueness theorems and the main abundance result would remain intact without them. The weakest point is that the He II λ4686 width is not tabulated with uncertainty and the WR blue bump is not detected, which is an evidentiary and interpretation concern rather than circularity.

Assumptions & free parameters 5 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central claims rest on measured line fluxes, literature ICFs, and standard stellar population/photoionization models. No new particles, forces, or physical entities are introduced; the Wolf-Rayet stars and direct-collapse black holes discussed are known astrophysical objects rather than invented ledger entries.

free parameters (5)
  • Electron density ne from [S II] = 345+184-172 cm^-3
    Derived from the [S II] 6716/6731 ratio together with Te([O III]); enters the PyNeb abundance calculation, and the paper's own Cloudy models show N/O from optical lines is density-sensitive.
  • SED stellar mass M* = log(M*/M_sun) = 9.34+0.08-0.10
    Derived from PROSPECTOR fitting to NIRCam photometry with a uniform prior; used to place ID60001 on the mass-metallicity relation when arguing against pristine gas dilution in Section 5.1.
  • SED 10 Myr star formation rate = 13.49+1.94-2.33 M_sun/yr
    Fitted with a non-parametric SFH; used together with EW0(H-alpha) to argue the galaxy is young, consistent with the Wolf-Rayet phase.
  • SED priors on AV, log U, and metallicity = AV prior center 0.0, sigma 0.2; log U prior center -2.3, sigma 0.5; log Z/Z_sun prior center -0.95, sigma 0.5
    These Gaussian priors are centered on the spectroscopic ISM results, coupling the SED host properties to the same measurements used in the abundance analysis.
  • Outflow and broad line profile parameters = FWHM_out ~ 645 km/s, FWHM_broad ~ 2175 km/s, tied flux ratios f_o/n between H-beta/H-alpha and [O III] lines
    Fitted Gaussians are used to isolate narrow components; the choice of decomposition changes Balmer ratios, the derived A(V)=0, and the final abundances.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Case B recombination at Te = 15000 K describes the Balmer line emissivities used for dust and abundance work.
    Invoked in Sections 3.3 and 3.5; deviations from Case B would change A(V) and the line-based O/H and N/H values.
  • domain assumption The ionization correction factors of Izotov et al. (2006) and Amayo et al. (2021) are valid for ID60001.
    Used in Section 3.5 to convert ionic ratios into total O/H and N/O; the ICF(N+/O+) correction of 0.09 dex is applied directly to the measured N+/O+ ratio.
  • domain assumption The [S II] 6716/6731 ratio measures the density of the same gas phase as the [O II] and [N II] zones.
    Section 3.4; the Cloudy models in Section 5.2 show optical N/O diagnostics shift by about 0.2 dex at high density, so the density attribution is load-bearing.
  • domain assumption ID60001 is not an AGN, based on optical diagnostic diagrams.
    Section 3.2; no X-ray, rest-frame UV, or mid-IR data are available, and the VO87-OI diagram places the object at the SF/AGN boundary, so a hidden AGN could mimic or alter the He II and N/O signals.
  • domain assumption STARBURST99 EW0(H-alpha)-to-age mapping and the Watanabe et al. (2024) direct-collapse Wolf-Rayet timescale apply to this galaxy.
    Section 5.1; the age estimate log(age/yr) <= 6.8 and the 10 Myr N/O elevation window both come from these external models.
  • domain assumption BPASS and Cloudy photoionization grids represent the ionizing spectrum and geometry of high-redshift star-forming galaxies.
    Section 5.2; the density-sensitivity comparison is only as good as the assumed stellar age, IMF, metallicity, and cloud geometry.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Potential Nitrogen Enrichment via Direct-Collapse Wolf-Rayet Stars in a $z=4.7$ Star-Forming Galaxy." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/HGRLZY4Z

@misc{pith2026250204817,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Potential Nitrogen Enrichment via Direct-Collapse Wolf-Rayet Stars in a $z=4.7$ Star-Forming Galaxy},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/HGRLZY4Z}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.04817}
}
abstract

We present analyses of a nitrogen-enriched star-forming galaxy, ID60001, at $z=4.6928$ based on JWST/NIRSpec MSA spectroscopy and NIRCam photometry. From rest-frame optical emission lines we derive the nitrogen-to-oxygen (N/O) abundance ratio of ID60001 to be $\log({\rm N/O})=-0.76_{-0.03}^{+0.03}$ ($[{\rm N/O}]=0.10_{-0.03}^{+0.03}$), which is significantly elevated at the corresponding metallicity $12+\log({\rm O/H})=7.75_{-0.01}^{+0.01}$ ($Z/Z_\odot = 0.12$) compared to local counterparts. We discuss possible scenarios for elevated N/O abundance in ID60001, including pristine gas inflow, Wolf-Rayet (WR) stars, and Oxygen depletion by Type II supernova winds. Based on the moderately broadened He{\sc ii}$\lambda$4686 emission line, galaxy morphology, and star-formation history, we conclude that the elevated N/O abundance of ID60001 is likely originated from massive ($>25\,M_\odot$) WR stars that directly collapse into a black hole. We also stress the importance of reliable electron density measurements when deriving N/O abundance with rest-frame optical emission lines.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.04817 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Top: Reduced 1D spectra of G235M/F170LP (blue) and G395/F290LP (red) filter/grating extracted from the 2D spectra. Bottom: Reduced 2D spectra of G235M/F170LP and G395/F290LP filter/grating. Regions containing bad pixels are masked out and indicated with gray shaded areas. to 1 : 2.98 and 1 : 2.94, respectively. For (partially) blended emission line complexes of [Oiii]λλ3727, 3729 and [Nii]λλ6548, 6584+Hα, we tie the… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Emission line fitting results for [OIII]λ5007 (left), Hβ (middle), and Hα(right). The black histograms and error bars denote the NIRSpec MSA observational data. The red solid curves shows the best-fit profiles. The narrow, outflow, and broad component of each best-fit profile are displayed with red, magenta, and brown dashed curves, respectively. ruption events (TDEs), and type IIn supernovae (SNe) can also result i… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Optical emission line diagnostics for AGN/SFG separation. Top-left: BPT diagram where the red data point indicate ID60001. The grey circles represent the SF galaxies taken from SDSS-DR8 (Kauffmann et al. 2003; Brinchmann et al. 2004; Tremonti et al. 2004). The black solid and dashed curve indicate the AGN-SF galaxy separation derived by Kewley et al. (2001) and Kauffmann et al. (2003), respectively. The blue dotted … view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (4 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: N/O abundance ratio versus gas phase metallicity of ID60001 (red square) and other high-z samples based on optical (solid black circles) and UV (open black circles) emission lines. For comparison, local samples (Pilyugin et al. 2012; Berg et al. 2020) and relatio…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Galfit fitting results for ID60001. Top and bottom row shows the observed data and residual from best-fit models, respectively. Our results show clumpy residuals only in F277W and F356W filters where Hβ+[Oiii] and Hα are included, respectively, indicating turbulent fea…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: The continuum image, Hβ+[Oiii] and Hα emis￾sion line maps, and their radial profiles. For continuum and emission line images, the crossmarks indicate the position of galaxy centroid and the contours denote (2.5, 5, 10, 20)σ levels in each corresponding image. We furthe…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Cloudy models for nH = 100 cm−3 (blue solid lines), 400 cm−3 (red solid lines), 2000 cm−3 ( blue dotted lines), and 20000 cm−3 (cyan dashed lines). Each grid spans the N/O and ionization parameter (U) range of −1.0 ≤ log(N/O) ≤ 0.0 and −3.5 ≤ log(U) ≤ −1.0, respectivel…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. OpenAlex reports about 4 citations worldwide. Full citation record

  1. Extremely UV-bright starbursts at the end of cosmic reionization

    astro-ph.GA 2025-10 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Very UV-bright galaxies at z~6 are ~6-Myr-old starbursts with high ionizing-photon efficiency, and one example shows evidence that dusty outflows push dust beyond the stars and boost its UV brightness.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 7 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    2021, MNRAS, 505, 2361, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1467 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T

    Amayo, A., Delgado-Inglada, G., & Stasi´ nska, G. 2021, MNRAS, 505, 2361, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stab1467 Astropy Collaboration, Robitaille, T. P., Tollerud, E. J., et al. 2013, A&A, 558, A33, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 Astropy Collaboration, Price-Whelan, A. M., Sip˝ ocz, B. M., et al. 2018, AJ, 156, 123, doi: 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stab1467 2021

  2. [2]

    A., Erb, D

    Berg, D. A., Erb, D. K., Henry, R. B. C., Skillman, E. D., & McQuinn, K. B. W. 2019, ApJ, 874, 93, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab020a

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab020a 2019

  3. [3]

    A., Pogge, R

    Berg, D. A., Pogge, R. W., Skillman, E. D., et al. 2020, ApJ, 893, 96, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab7eab

    doi:10.3847/1538-4357/ab7eab 2020

  4. [4]

    1996, A&AS, 117, 393, doi: 10.1051/aas:1996164

    Bertin, E., & Arnouts, S. 1996, A&AS, 117, 393, doi: 10.1051/aas:1996164

    doi:10.1051/aas:1996164 1996

  5. [5]

    2023, larrybradley/lacosmic: 1.1.0, 1.1.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10145563

    Bradley, L. 2023, larrybradley/lacosmic: 1.1.0, 1.1.0, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.10145563

    work page doi:10.5281/zenodo.10145563 2023

  6. [6]

    2022, grizli, 1.5.0, Zenodo, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.6672538

    Brammer, G., Strait, V., Matharu, J., & Momcheva, I. 2022, grizli, 1.5.0, Zenodo, Zenodo, doi: 10.5281/zenodo.6672538

    doi:10.5281/zenodo.6672538 2022

  7. [7]

    Brinchmann, J., Charlot, S., White, S. D. M., et al. 2004, MNRAS, 351, 1151, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07881.x

    work page arXiv 2004

  8. [8]

    J., Saxena, A., Cameron, A

    Bunker, A. J., Saxena, A., Cameron, A. J., et al. 2023, A&A, 677, A88, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346159

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346159 2023

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    C., et al

    Calzetti, D., Armus, L., Bohlin, R. C., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 682, doi: 10.1086/308692

    2000 doi

  2. [10]

    J., Katz, H., Rey, M

    Cameron, A. J., Katz, H., Rey, M. P., & Saxena, A. 2023, MNRAS, 523, 3516, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad1579

    2023 doi

  3. [11]

    A., Clayton, G

    Cardelli, J. A., Clayton, G. C., & Mathis, J. S. 1989, ApJ, 345, 245, doi: 10.1086/167900

    1989 doi

  4. [12]

    2003, PASP, 115, 763, doi: 10.1086/376392

    Chabrier, G. 2003, PASP, 115, 763, doi: 10.1086/376392

    2003 doi

  5. [13]

    2023, RMxAA, 59, 327, doi: 10.22201/ia.01851101p.2023.59.02.12

    Chatzikos, M., Bianchi, S., Camilloni, F., et al. 2023, RMxAA, 59, 327, doi: 10.22201/ia.01851101p.2023.59.02.12

    2023 doi

  6. [14]

    2017, ApJ, 838, 159, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa679f

    Choi, J., Conroy, C., & Byler, N. 2017, ApJ, 838, 159, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa679f

    2017 doi

  7. [15]

    2016, ApJ, 823, 102, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102

    Choi, J., Dotter, A., Conroy, C., et al. 2016, ApJ, 823, 102, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/823/2/102

    2016 doi

  8. [16]

    Conroy, C., & Gunn, J. E. 2010, ApJ, 712, 833, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/712/2/833

    2010 doi

  9. [17]

    E., & White, M

    Conroy, C., Gunn, J. E., & White, M. 2009, ApJ, 699, 486, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/699/1/486

    2009 doi

  10. [18]

    A., Hadfield, L

    Crowther, P. A., Hadfield, L. J., Clark, J. S., Negueruela, I., & Vacca, W. D. 2006, MNRAS, 372, 1407, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2006.10952.x

    2006

  11. [19]

    D., Clayton, G

    Gordon, K. D., Clayton, G. C., Misselt, K. A., Landolt, A. U., & Wolff, M. J. 2003, ApJ, 594, 279, doi: 10.1086/376774

    2003 doi

  12. [20]

    G., Izotov, Y

    Guseva, N. G., Izotov, Y. I., & Thuan, T. X. 2000, ApJ, 531, 776, doi: 10.1086/308489

    2000 doi

  13. [21]

    2023, ApJ, 959, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad029e

    Harikane, Y., Zhang, Y., Nakajima, K., et al. 2023, ApJ, 959, 39, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad029e

    2023 doi

  14. [22]

    2023a, ApJ, 956, 139, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acf376

    Isobe, Y., Ouchi, M., Nakajima, K., et al. 2023a, ApJ, 956, 139, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acf376

    doi

  15. [23]

    2023b, ApJ, 959, 100, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad09be

    Isobe, Y., Ouchi, M., Tominaga, N., et al. 2023b, ApJ, 959, 100, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad09be

    doi

  16. [24]

    Thuan, T. X. 2006, A&A, 448, 955, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361:20053763

    2006 doi

  17. [25]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.04148, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.04148

    Ji, X., ¨Ubler, H., Maiolino, R., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.04148, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.04148

    2024 doi arXiv

  18. [26]

    D., Leja, J., Conroy, C., & Speagle, J

    Johnson, B. D., Leja, J., Conroy, C., & Speagle, J. S. 2021, ApJS, 254, 22, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/abef67 12

    2021 doi

  19. [27]

    M., Tremonti, C., et al

    Kauffmann, G., Heckman, T. M., Tremonti, C., et al. 2003, MNRAS, 346, 1055, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2003.07154.x

    2003

  20. [28]

    J., Dopita, M

    Kewley, L. J., Dopita, M. A., Sutherland, R. S., Heisler, C. A., & Trevena, J. 2001, ApJ, 556, 121, doi: 10.1086/321545

    2001 doi

  21. [29]

    J., Maier, C., Yabe, K., et al

    Kewley, L. J., Maier, C., Yabe, K., et al. 2013, ApJL, 774, L10, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/774/1/L10

    2013 doi

  22. [30]

    2024, ApJL, 962, L6, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad1de1

    Kobayashi, C., & Ferrara, A. 2024, ApJL, 962, L6, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad1de1

    2024 doi

  23. [31]

    2017, PASJ, 69, 44, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx017

    Kojima, T., Ouchi, M., Nakajima, K., et al. 2017, PASJ, 69, 44, doi: 10.1093/pasj/psx017

    2017 doi

  24. [32]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.04777, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2407.04777

    Kokubo, M., & Harikane, Y. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2407.04777, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2407.04777

    2024 doi

  25. [33]

    L., Finkelstein, S

    Larson, R. L., Finkelstein, S. L., Kocevski, D. D., et al. 2023, ApJL, 953, L29, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ace619

    2023 doi

  26. [34]

    Speagle, J. S. 2019, ApJ, 876, 3, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab133c

    2019 doi

  27. [35]

    Luridiana, V., Morisset, C., & Shaw, R. A. 2015, A&A, 573, A42, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201323152

    2015 doi

  28. [36]

    1995, ApJ, 441, 18, doi: 10.1086/175332

    Madau, P. 1995, ApJ, 441, 18, doi: 10.1086/175332

    1995 doi

  29. [37]

    2024, A&A, 691, A145, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347640

    Maiolino, R., Scholtz, J., Curtis-Lake, E., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A145, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347640

    2024 doi

  30. [38]

    2024, A&A, 681, A30, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347411

    Marques-Chaves, R., Schaerer, D., Kuruvanthodi, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 681, A30, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347411

    2024 doi

  31. [39]

    2023, A&A, 678, A159, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346732

    Upadhyaya, A. 2023, A&A, 678, A159, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202346732

    2023 doi

  32. [40]

    2024a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.10037, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.10037

    Morishita, T., Stiavelli, M., Schuldt, S., & Grillo, C. 2024a, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2404.10037, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2404.10037

    doi arXiv

  33. [41]

    2024b, ApJ, 963, 9, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1404

    Morishita, T., Stiavelli, M., Chary, R.-R., et al. 2024b, ApJ, 963, 9, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad1404

    doi

  34. [42]

    2024c, ApJ, 971, 43, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5290

    Morishita, T., Stiavelli, M., Grillo, C., et al. 2024c, ApJ, 971, 43, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad5290

    doi

  35. [43]

    2023, ApJS, 269, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acd556

    Nakajima, K., Ouchi, M., Isobe, Y., et al. 2023, ApJS, 269, 33, doi: 10.3847/1538-4365/acd556

    2023 doi

  36. [44]

    C., Sutherland, R

    Nicholls, D. C., Sutherland, R. S., Dopita, M. A., Kewley, L. J., & Groves, B. A. 2017, MNRAS, 466, 4403, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stw3235

    2017 doi

  37. [46]

    Rogers, N. S. J., Strom, A. L., Rudie, G. C., et al. 2024, ApJL, 964, L12, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad2f37

    2024 doi

  38. [47]

    L., Shapley, A

    Sanders, R. L., Shapley, A. E., Topping, M. W., Reddy, N. A., & Brammer, G. B. 2024, ApJ, 962, 24, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad15fc

    2024 doi

  39. [48]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.08408, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2406.08408

    Schaerer, D., Marques-Chaves, R., Xiao, M., & Korber, D. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.08408, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2406.08408

    2024 doi arXiv

  40. [49]

    F., & Finkbeiner, D

    Schlafly, E. F., & Finkbeiner, D. P. 2011, ApJ, 737, 103, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103

    2011 doi

  41. [50]

    J., Finkbeiner, D

    Schlegel, D. J., Finkbeiner, D. P., & Davis, M. 1998, ApJ, 500, 525, doi: 10.1086/305772

    1998 doi

  42. [51]

    2012, MNRAS, 421, 1043, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20439.x

    Shirazi, M., & Brinchmann, J. 2012, MNRAS, 421, 1043, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20439.x

    2012

  43. [52]

    R., & Eldridge, J

    Stanway, E. R., & Eldridge, J. J. 2018, MNRAS, 479, 75, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sty1353

    2018 doi

  44. [53]

    2023, ApJL, 957, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0159 —

    Stiavelli, M., Morishita, T., Chiaberge, M., et al. 2023, ApJL, 957, L18, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ad0159 —. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.06517, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2412.06517

    2023 doi arXiv

  45. [54]

    W., Stark, D

    Topping, M. W., Stark, D. P., Senchyna, P., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 529, 3301, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae682

    2024 doi

  46. [55]

    A., Heckman, T

    Tremonti, C. A., Heckman, T. M., Kauffmann, G., et al. 2004, ApJ, 613, 898, doi: 10.1086/423264 van Dokkum, P. G. 2001, PASP, 113, 1420, doi: 10.1086/323894

    2004 doi

  47. [56]

    Veilleux, S., & Osterbrock, D. E. 1987, ApJS, 63, 295, doi: 10.1086/191166

    1987 doi

  48. [57]

    2024, ApJ, 962, 50, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad13ff

    Watanabe, K., Ouchi, M., Nakajima, K., et al. 2024, ApJ, 962, 50, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad13ff

    2024 doi

  49. [58]

    2024, ApJ, 970, 19, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad47f4

    Zhang, Y., Ouchi, M., Nakajima, K., et al. 2024, ApJ, 970, 19, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad47f4

    2024 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.