Pith. sign in

REVIEW 5 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

More Than Beautiful: Exploring Design Features, Practical Perspectives, and Implications of Artistic Data Visualization

T0 review · 5 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Artistic data visualization is a distinct design practice rooted in contemporary art, not a decorative offshoot of analytics.

desk verdict A mostly sound taxonomy-building study whose central generalizing claim is undercut by the VISAP-heavy corpus, but the limitations are acknowledged and the new constructs are real. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.04940 v1 pith:AHAIGXZZ submitted 2025-02-07 cs.HC

Xingyu Lan , Yifan Wang , Lingyu Peng , Xiaofan Ma This is my paper · ORCID
classification cs.HC
keywords artisticvisualizationdataartdesigntaxonomyintentstechniquesaestheticsqualitativestudy
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that artistic data visualization is a distinct design practice in its own right, deeply rooted in contemporary art discourse, and not merely a decorative or low-stakes version of analytics. The authors support this by analyzing 220 data artworks through open coding and by interviewing twelve practicing data artists, producing a design taxonomy with three dimensions: design paradigms, design intents, and design techniques. Their finding is that data artists consistently privilege concepts, subjective expression, and sensory richness over the readability and efficiency that dominate conventional visualization work. If the taxonomy is accepted, it supplies the visualization community with a shared vocabulary for studying art-driven data work and with seven concrete directions for future research.

What carries the argument

The design taxonomy is the central machinery of the paper. It organizes 220 artworks along three dimensions: design paradigms (high-level creative lenses such as generative art and speculative art), design intents (what the artist is trying to do, including experiment, re-present, and witness), and 32 design techniques grouped into sensation, interaction, narrative, and physicality. The taxonomy does the argumentative work by showing that art-driven visualization shares some techniques with narrative and affective visualization yet differs in its reliance on high-level paradigms, its openness to meaning, and its use of sound, smell, taste, and physical materials as encoding channels.

What would settle it

Build a new corpus from non-academic, non-Western, and pre-2010 data artworks, code it with the same three-dimension taxonomy, and compare the frequency distributions. If the dominant intent is no longer experiment and the four technique categories fail to recover the codes, the field-level claim would be refuted.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that artistic data visualization has its own distinctive characteristics in both inner pursuits and outer presentations, such that it belongs more to art discourse than to the analytics-centered vocabulary of information visualization. Concretely, the corpus analysis finds that the most common design intent is experiment, challenging or reimagining conventional representation, followed by inform, engage, re-present, provoke, and criticize, and that the thirty-two design techniques cluster into sensation, interaction, narrative, and physicality. The interviews show artists often work in an output-driven mode, deciding the aesthetic form and concept first and then using data as a medium, and they justify lower precision by appealing to an alternative mechanism of communication that operates through immersion and open interpretation.

Load-bearing premise

The taxonomy is meant to describe artistic data visualization at large, but most of the 220 works were drawn from a single academic venue's arts program, and the authors themselves note the corpus is not exhaustive and skews toward recent, Western, and explicitly tagged works.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Aesthetics in visualization should be treated as broader than beauty, encompassing critical, deconstructive, and anti-beautiful stances that provoke reflection.
  • Evaluation metrics should move beyond immediate hedonic ratings toward context-rich, long-term measures such as interviews, diaries, and ethnographic observation.
  • Data artists' output-driven workflows suggest that tools built for them should support concept-first ideation and expressive experimentation, not just analytic pipelines.
  • Cross-modal encoding using sound, smell, taste, and physical materials offers concrete pathways for accessible and everyday visualization.
  • Artists can adopt structured design-study and rigor criteria from visualization research, while researchers can borrow artists' participatory, community-engaged deployment methods.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the taxonomy is representative, the recurring boundary dispute between data art and data visualization could be recast as an empirical question about where works fall on the intent and technique dimensions rather than a matter of definition.
  • Because most of the corpus comes from one academic arts-program venue, the frequency rankings may describe that community better than commercial, non-Western, or early data art; a more diverse sample could test whether experiment and physicality remain dominant.
  • The witness and re-present intents suggest artistic data visualization can function as public testimony about data; a testable extension would compare long-term reflective engagement between witness-style and conventional data stories.
  • The output-driven workflow reported by artists, if formalized, could become a design pattern language for expressive visualization that inverts the usual data-first pipeline.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

5 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents an empirical study of artistic data visualization. The authors analyze 220 data artworks (195 from IEEE VISAP and 25 from snowballed sources), code them for design paradigms, intents, and techniques, and interview twelve data artists. They propose a three-part design taxonomy and seven future research directions, and they make their corpus, raw datasets, and code publicly available. The central claim, stated in the abstract and conclusion, is that artistic data visualization is deeply rooted in art discourse and has distinctive characteristics in both inner pursuits and outer presentations.

Significance. This is a timely and useful synthesis of an under-theorized area. The corpus is large for a qualitative design analysis, the five newly identified design intents and the four technique categories are plausible and well illustrated, and the interviews add a practitioner perspective that cross-checks the taxonomy. The authors are transparent about corpus limitations and provide reproducible artifacts. If the central claim is substantiated after revision, the taxonomy and the seven lessons would be valuable to both visualization researchers and data artists. The main risk is that the strength of the conclusion currently exceeds the venue-defined evidence on which it rests.

major comments (5)
  1. [Abstract, Section 4.1, Section 7] The abstract and conclusion make a field-level claim that artistic data visualization is 'deeply rooted in art discourse' with 'distinctive characteristics in both inner pursuits and outer presentations.' However, Section 4.1 reports that 195 of the 220 corpus works come from IEEE VISAP, and the remaining 25 were snowballed from sources explicitly tagged as data art; Section 7 concedes that the corpus primarily features works from or closely associated with the visualization academic community and is not exhaustive. Because VISAP's review process and artist statements already presuppose an artistic framing, the frequency distributions (e.g., experiment as the top intent, the prominence of sensation and physicality) may be partly constituted by the inclusion rule rather than discovered in data art generally. Please either restrict the central claim to the academic/venue ecosystem or provide additional evidence—such as a broader non-VISAP sample or a sensitivity analysis—that the patterns generalize.
  2. [Section 4.2.1, Section 5.1] The coding process is reported as reaching '100% agreement' after four rounds of meetings and discussion, but the paper does not report independent pre-reconciliation agreement, per-code reliability, or a metric such as Cohen's kappa. Since the frequency distributions of the taxonomy are the paper's main empirical result, this makes it difficult to assess coding robustness. Please report the initial agreement level and how disagreements were resolved; the same applies to the thematic analysis of the interviews in Section 5.1.
  3. [Section 4.2.2, Section 4.3] The 'design paradigm' dimension is coded only from 37 explicit mentions across the 220-work corpus, meaning that for the large majority of works no paradigm was identified. The paper nevertheless presents design paradigm as one of the three main taxonomy dimensions and later states that artistic data visualization is 'fundamentally shaped by high-level design paradigms.' This claim goes beyond what the data support for the works without such explicit mentions. Either code paradigms for the full corpus or present this material as a subtheme rather than as a full taxonomy dimension.
  4. [Section 4.2.3] The text says that all ten prior intents from Lan et al. are present and that five new intents were identified, implying fifteen intent categories total. However, the enumeration that follows lists only fourteen categories with frequencies: experiment, inform, engage, re-present, provoke, criticize, equip, analyze, advocate, socialize, witness, archive, commemorate, and empower. Please reconcile this discrepancy by either adding the missing intent and its count or revising the description of how the prior and new intents combine.
  5. [Section 4.3] The claim that artistic data visualization has 'different distributions' of intents and 'distinct features' in techniques is made by comparing frequency observations with previously published taxonomies, but no direct comparison is reported in which the same codebook is applied to a comparable non-artistic visualization corpus. Without such a baseline, the distinctiveness claim is not fully supported. Please add a comparison coding exercise or soften the conclusion to describe the observed patterns within this corpus rather than differences from other domains.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Section 4.2.2] The term 'aministic design' appears to be a typo; it should read 'animistic design.'
  2. [Author affiliations] The author affiliations contain stray spaces in 'Harbin Institute of T echnology' and 'Sun Y at-sen University'; these should be corrected.
  3. [Section 2.2] The quoted sentence from Willers reads 'the artistic approach is unlikely be appreciated'; it should be 'unlikely to be appreciated.'
  4. [Section 5.2.1] The notation 'P11*3 times (3 different works)' is unclear; please explain the convention for multiple works by the same participant or present the workflow counts in a small table.
  5. [References] Reference [22] is cited in the text as 'Gates' but the reference is to Gates-Stuart et al.; the in-text citation should match the reference entry.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the taxonomy is induced from corpus and interviews; a single self-cited codebook is a non-load-bearing starting lens.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—that artistic data visualization is deeply rooted in art discourse with distinctive inner pursuits and outer presentations—is an inductive synthesis of two empirical inputs: open coding of 220 artworks and thematic analysis of 12 artist interviews. The design taxonomy (paradigms, intents, techniques) is a description of the corpus, not a value predicted from the claim, so there is no fitted-input-called-prediction or self-definitional reduction. The only notable self-citation is Lan et al. [43], the first author's prior affective-visualization intent taxonomy, used as the starting codebook for coding design intents in Section 4.2.3. This makes the observation that 'all the ten intents are present' partly a coding artifact, but the paper's distinctive content consists of the five newly identified intents, the frequency distributions (e.g., experiment as most common), and the interview resonance, all of which emerged from the data rather than being forced by the cited taxonomy. The VISAP-heavy corpus is an acknowledged sampling limitation (Section 7) and affects external validity, not circularity: concluding from a self-selected data-art sample that data art is art-discourse-rooted is an interpretive generalization, not a logical reduction of the output to the input. No uniqueness theorem, ansatz, or hidden fit is imported from the authors' prior work. Overall, the derivation chain is self-contained and only a minor, non-load-bearing self-citation prevents a score of 0.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 3 invented entities

The central claim rests on several interpretive premises: that the VISAP-heavy corpus represents the field, that coding consensus indicates reliability, and that artist statements and interviews reflect actual design practice. No numeric parameters are fitted, and the taxonomy categories are analytical outputs rather than measured quantities. No physical or metaphysical entities are introduced.

assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption IEEE VISAP accepted works are representative of artistic data visualization practice.
    The corpus is 195 of 220 works from IEEE VISAP (Section 4.1). The taxonomy generalizes to the field, yet VISAP is tied to the academic visualization community, and the authors note the corpus is not exhaustive and low in non-Western works (Section 7).
  • domain assumption Coding consensus after discussion is a valid indicator of coding reliability.
    Section 4.2.1 reports 100 percent agreement after four rounds of meetings and coding, without independent inter-rater metrics such as Cohen's kappa.
  • domain assumption Artists' written statements and interview self-reports accurately reflect their design intents.
    The taxonomy codes artworks 'referring to the artists' own explanations' (Section 4.2.1) and interview themes rely on self-report (Section 5.2), assuming no systematic gap between stated and actual practice.
  • domain assumption The art history narrative (mimesis to contemporary art) adequately contextualizes data art.
    Section 2.1 presents a compressed art-historical framing from Plato to postmodernism, an interpretive lens rather than a neutral fact.
invented entities (3)
  • Five new design intents: re-present, criticize, equip, analyze, witness.
    purpose: To describe artistic data visualization intents not captured by the ten prior intents from Lan et al.
    These are analytical categories derived from coding the same corpus the paper studies; no external validation is provided.
  • Four-category technique space: sensation, interaction, narrative, physicality.
    purpose: To organize the 32 identified design techniques for artistic data visualization.
    The grouping is a coding output, not a validated measurement instrument.
  • Design paradigm as a third taxonomy dimension.
    purpose: To capture high-level creative lenses (e.g., generative art, glitch art) that shape artistic data visualization.
    Added to the codebook during iterative discussion (Section 4.2.1); it is an interpretive construct introduced by the authors.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of More Than Beautiful: Exploring Design Features, Practical Perspectives, and Implications of Artistic Data Visualization." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/AHAIGXZZ

@misc{pith2026250204940,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: More Than Beautiful: Exploring Design Features, Practical Perspectives, and Implications of Artistic Data Visualization},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/AHAIGXZZ}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.04940}
}
read the original abstract

Standing at the intersection of science and art, artistic data visualization has gained popularity in recent years and emerged as a significant domain. Despite more than a decade since the field's conceptualization, a noticeable gap remains in research concerning the design features of artistic data visualizations, the aesthetic goals they pursue, and their potential to inspire our community. To address these gaps, we analyzed 220 data artworks to understand their design paradigms and intents, and construct a design taxonomy to characterize their design techniques (e.g., sensation, interaction, narrative, physicality). We also conducted in-depth interviews with twelve data artists to explore their practical perspectives, such as their understanding of artistic data visualization and the challenges they encounter. In brief, we found that artistic data visualization is deeply rooted in art discourse, with its own distinctive characteristics in both inner pursuits and outer presentations. Based on our research, we outline seven prospective paths for future work.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.04940 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Particle Dreams in Spherical Harmonics [66]. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p002_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Machine Hallucinations [1] [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_3.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Smell Maps [49]. Since 2010, British artist Kate McLean has been working on translating the sensed aspects of place into visualizations. Starting with the first smell map of Paris, she has created a set of smell maps in various cities (e.g., in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Left: All identified design techniques and their frequencies. Right: Examples of the artworks. (A) Agitato [85], (B) Applying color [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_4.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Charting the Moral Universe: Capturing Virtues and Values of Data Visualization Practice

    cs.HC 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    A 20-expert interview study yields a taxonomy of 68 values in nine virtue clusters for ethical data-visualization practice.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

92 extracted references · 50 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    R. Anadol. Machine hallucinations. https://refikanadol.com/ works/. Accessed: Sept 1, 2024

    2024

  2. [2]

    R. Anadol. Art in the age of machine intelligence. https://www.te d.com/talks/refik_anadol_art_in_the_age_of_machine_i ntelligence, 2020. Accessed: Sept 1, 2024

    2020

  3. [3]

    Anadol, C

    R. Anadol, C. Reas, M. Kuo, and P. Antonelli. Modern dream: How Refik Anadol is using machine learning and NFTs to interpret MoMA’s collection. https://www.moma.org/magazine/articles/658 ,

  4. [4]

    Barabási

    A.-L. Barabási. Why the world needs ‘Dataism,’ the new art movement that helps us understand how our world is shaped by big data. https: //news.artnet.com/art-world-archives/introducing-dat aism-2181005/, 2022. Accessed: Sept 1, 2024

    2022

  5. [5]

    Bateman, R

    S. Bateman, R. L. Mandryk, C. Gutwin, A. Genest, D. McDine, and C. Brooks. Useful junk? The effects of visual embellishment on comprehension and memorability of charts. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 2573–2582. ACM, 2010. doi: 10.1145/1753326.1753716

    arXiv 2010

  6. [6]

    Numbers game: The artists making waves with big data

    BBC. Numbers game: The artists making waves with big data. https: //www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/articles/3cWncg5C339NZ5Xk BSQqyGN/numbers-game-the-artists-making-waves-with-b ig-data/, 2019. Accessed: Sept 1, 2024

    2019

  7. [7]

    A. Bbscura. Learning about cities by mapping their smells. https: //www.atlasobscura.com/articles/art-mapping-smell-s mellscapes-kate-mclean , 2017. Accessed: Sept 1, 2024

    2017

  8. [8]

    Braun and V

    V . Braun and V . Clarke.Thematic analysis: A practical guide. Sage, 2022

    2022

Show all 92 references
  1. [9]

    A. W. Brown and A. Fagg. Bion. http://adamwbrown.net/proje cts-2/bion-home/ . Accessed: Sept 1, 2024

    2024

  2. [10]

    S. Brown. Art or science? Fifty years of marketing debate. The Mar- keting Review, 2(1):89–119, 2001. doi: 10.1080/0267257X.1996.9964413

    2001

  3. [11]

    Castellanos and A

    M. Castellanos and A. Valverde. Beyond human perception. https: //www.mariacastellanos.net/?/=/seccion/projects/entr ada/bhp_eng, 2022. Accessed: Sept 1, 2024

    2022

  4. [12]

    Cawthon and A

    N. Cawthon and A. V . Moere. The effect of aesthetic on the usability of data visualization. In International Conference on Information Visualisation, pp. 637–648. IEEE, 2007. doi: 10.1109/IV.2007.147

    2007 doi

  5. [13]

    The future of maps: Cartography in the 21st century

    CNN. The future of maps: Cartography in the 21st century. https: //edition.cnn.com/style/article/cartography-in-the-2 1st-century/index.html, 2018. Accessed: Sept 1, 2024

    2018

  6. [14]

    J. Diaz. Refik Anadol is betting his AI art can help build a better world. https://www.fastcompany.com/90953433/refik-anadol-a i-art, 2023. Accessed: Sept 1, 2024

    2023

  7. [15]

    K. Enge, E. Elmquist, V . Caiola, N. Rönnberg, A. Rind, M. Iber, S. Lenzi, F. Lan, R. Höldrich, and W. Aigner. Open your ears and take a look: A state-of-the-art report on the integration of sonification and visualization. 43(3):e15114, 2024. doi: 10.1111/cgf.15114

    2024 doi

  8. [16]

    Synthesis: Processing and collaboration

    EVL. Synthesis: Processing and collaboration. https://www.evl. uic.edu/dan/resources/synthesis__processing_and_coll aboration.pdf, 2011. Accessed: Sept 1, 2024

    2011

  9. [17]

    Virtual reality (VR) content

    EVL. Virtual reality (VR) content. https://www.evl.uic.edu/da n/VRcontent.html, 2011. Accessed: Sept 1, 2024

    2011

  10. [18]

    S. Few. Data art vs. data visualization: Why does a distinction mat- ter? https://www.perceptualedge.com/blog/?p=1245#/ . Accessed: Sept 1, 2024

    2024

  11. [19]

    H. Foster. Recodings: Art, spectacle, cultural politics. 1985

    1985

  12. [20]

    F. Frankel. Envisioning science–a personal perspective. Science, 280(5370):1698–1700, 1998. doi: 10.1126/science.280.5370.1698

    1998

  13. [21]

    Galanter

    P. Galanter. Computational aesthetic evaluation: past and future. In Computers and creativity, pp. 255–293. Springer, 2012

    2012

  14. [22]

    Gates-Stuart, C

    E. Gates-Stuart, C. Nguyen, M. Adcock, J. Bradley, M. Morell, and D. Lovell. Art and science as creative catalysts. Leonardo, 49(5):452– 453, 2016. doi: 10.1162/LEON_a_01065

    2016 doi

  15. [23]

    Guljajeva and M

    V . Guljajeva and M. C. Sola. NeuroKnitting Beethoven. https: //var-mar.info/neuroknitting-beethoven/ , 2020. Accessed: Sept 1, 2024

    2020

  16. [24]

    Harrison and P

    C. Harrison and P. Wood. Art in Theory, 1900-1990 an Anthology of Changing Ideas. Blackwell, 1992

    1900

  17. [25]

    Harrison, K

    L. Harrison, K. Reinecke, and R. Chang. Infographic aesthetics: De- signing for the first impression. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1187–1190. ACM, 2015. doi: 10.1145/2702123.2702545

    2015

  18. [26]

    T. He, P. Isenberg, R. Dachselt, and T. Isenberg. Beauvis: A vali- dated scale for measuring the aesthetic pleasure of visual representa- tions. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 29(1):363–373, 2022. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2022.3209390

    2022

  19. [27]

    L. M. Holloway, C. Goncu, A. Ilsar, M. Butler, and K. Marriott. Infoson- ics: Accessible infographics for people who are blind using sonification and voice. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–13. ACM, 2022. doi: 10.1145/3491102. 3517465

    2022 doi

  20. [28]

    L. E. Holmquist and T. Skog. Informative art: Information visualization in everyday environments. In Proceedings of Computer Graphics and Interactive Techniques in Australia and South East Asia, pp. 229–235. ACM, 2003. doi: 10.1145/604471.604516

    2003

  21. [29]

    D. Hopkins. After modern art 1945-2000. Oxford University Press, 2000

    1945

  22. [30]

    Hornecker, T

    E. Hornecker, T. Hogan, U. Hinrichs, and R. Van Koningsbruggen. A design vocabulary for data physicalization. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction, 31(1):1–62, 2023. doi: 10.1145/3617366

    2023 doi

  23. [31]

    the sky is falling

    A. Jeni. “the sky is falling...”. https://vimeo.com/198473646 . Accessed: Sept 1, 2024

    2024

  24. [32]

    H. H. Jiang, L. Brown, J. Cheng, M. Khan, A. Gupta, D. Workman, A. Hanna, J. Flowers, and T. Gebru. Ai art and its impact on artists. In Proceedings of the AAAI/ACM Conference on AI, Ethics, and Society, pp. 363–374, 2023. doi: 10.1145/3600211.3604681

    2023

  25. [33]

    A. E. Johnson, L. Renambot, G. E. Marai, D. Tsoupikova, M. E. Papka, L. Long, D. Plepys, J. Talandis, M. D. Brown, J. Leigh, et al. Electronic Visualization Laboratory’s 50th anniversary retrospective: Look to the future, build on the past. PRESENCE: Virtual and Augmented Real...

    2024 doi

  26. [34]

    Judelman

    G. Judelman. Aesthetics and inspiration for visualization design: Bridg- ing the gap between art and science. In International Conference on Information Visualisation, pp. 245–250. IEEE, 2004. doi: 10.1109/IV. 2004.1320152

    2004 arXiv

  27. [35]

    T. Kaur. Exclusive interview with Kate McLean. https://www.mari efranceasia.com/culture/entertainment/exclusive-int erview-with-smellscape-artist-kate-mclean-104777.ht ml, 2015. Accessed: Sept 1, 2024

    2015

  28. [36]

    Kerzner, S

    E. Kerzner, S. Goodwin, J. Dykes, S. Jones, and M. Meyer. A frame- work for creative visualization-opportunities workshops. IEEE Trans- actions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 25(1):748–758, 2018. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2018.2865241

    2018

  29. [37]

    N. W. Kim, H. Im, N. Henry Riche, A. Wang, K. Gajos, and H. Pfis- ter. Dataselfie: Empowering people to design personalized visuals to represent their data. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Hu- man Factors in Computing Systems , pp. 1–12. ACM, 2019. doi: 10. 1145/329060...

    2019

  30. [38]

    A. Koblin. Data visions. https://www.thinkwithgoogle.com/fu ture-of-marketing/emerging-technology/data-visions/ ,

  31. [39]

    R. Kosara. Visualization criticism-the missing link between informa- tion visualization and art. In International Conference on Information Visualisation, pp. 631–636. IEEE, 2007. doi: 10.1109/IV.2007.130

    2007 doi

  32. [40]

    J. E. Kyprianidis, J. Collomosse, T. Wang, and T. Isenberg. State of the “art”’: A taxonomy of artistic stylization techniques for images and video. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 19(5):866–885, 2012. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2012.160

    2012 doi

  33. [41]

    Laidlaw, D

    D. Laidlaw, D. Kremers, V . Interrante, F. Frankel, and T. Banchoff. Art and visualization: Oil and water? In IEEE Conference on Visualization, pp. 507–507. IEEE, 1998. doi: 10.1109/VISUAL.1998.745355

    1998

  34. [42]

    X. Lan, Y . Shi, Y . Wu, X. Jiao, and N. Cao. Kineticharts: Augment- ing affective expressiveness of charts in data stories with animation design. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 28(1):933–943, 2021. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2021.3114775

    2021

  35. [43]

    X. Lan, Y . Wu, and N. Cao. Affective visualization design: Leveraging the emotional impact of data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 30(1):1–11, 2024. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2023.3327385

    2024

  36. [44]

    X. Lan, Y . Wu, Y . Shi, Q. Chen, and N. Cao. Negative emotions, positive outcomes? Exploring the communication of negativity in serious data stories. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–14. ACM, 2022. doi: 10.1145/ 3491102.3517530

    2022

  37. [45]

    Levin, Z

    G. Levin, Z. Lieberman, J. Blonk, and J. La Barbara. Messa di voce. https://vimeo.com/2892576, 2003. Accessed: Sept 1, 2024

    2003

  38. [46]

    J. Li, S. Hashim, and J. Jacobs. What we can learn from visual artists about software development. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–14. ACM, 2021. doi: 10.1145/3411764.3445682

    2021

  39. [47]

    Y . Li, K. Zhang, Y . Huang, and V . Guljajeva. Bitter data: An exploration into data edibilization of negative emotion. In IEEE VIS Arts Program, pp. 44–59. IEEE, 2023. doi: 10.1109/VISAP60414.2023.00010

    2023

  40. [48]

    Luo and S

    J. Luo and S. Green. Decomposition of human portraits. https: //visap.net/2018/media/VISAP18-Catalogue.pdf . Accessed: Sept 1, 2024

    2018

  41. [49]

    K. McLean. Sensory maps. https://sensorymaps.com/projec ts/. Accessed: Sept 1, 2024

    2024

  42. [50]

    K. J. McLean. Nose-first: Practices of smellwalking and smellscape mapping. Royal College of Art (United Kingdom), 2019

    2019

  43. [51]

    Meyer and J

    M. Meyer and J. Dykes. Criteria for rigor in visualization design study. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 26(1):87–97, 2020. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2019.2934539

    2020

  44. [52]

    A. V . Moere, M. Tomitsch, C. Wimmer, B. Christoph, and T. Grechenig. Evaluating the effect of style in information visualization. IEEE Trans- actions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18(12):2739–2748,

  45. [53]

    Offenhuber

    D. Offenhuber. Data by proxy—material traces as autographic visual- izations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 26(1):98–108, 2019. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2019.2934788

    2019

  46. [54]

    J. Ong. #home. https://www.arkfrequencies.com/sound-spa ce/home-2/. Accessed: Sept 1, 2024

    2024

  47. [55]

    doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2012.221

    2012 doi

  48. [56]

    Perry and P

    G. Perry and P. Wood. Themes in contemporary art. Yale University Press, 2004

    2004

  49. [57]

    Pooke and D

    G. Pooke and D. Newall. Art history: The basics. Routledge, 2021

    2021

  50. [58]

    L. J. Perovich, S. A. Wylie, and R. Bongiovanni. Chemicals in the Creek: Designing a situated data physicalization of open government data with the community.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Com- puter Graphics, 27(2):913–923, 2020. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2020.3030472

    2020

  51. [59]

    Pousman, J

    Z. Pousman, J. Stasko, and M. Mateas. Casual information visual- ization: Depictions of data in everyday life. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 13(6):1145–1152, 2007. doi: 10. 1109/TVCG.2007.70541

    2007

  52. [60]

    Redström, T

    J. Redström, T. Skog, and L. Hallnäs. Informative art: Using amplified artworks as information displays. In Proceedings of DARE on Design- ing augmented reality environments, pp. 103–114. ACM, 2000. doi: 10. 1145/354666.354677

  53. [61]

    J. D. Porteous. Smellscape. Progress in Physical Geography, 9(3):356– 378, 1985. doi: 10.1177/030913338500900303

    1985 doi

  54. [62]

    Rodgers and L

    J. Rodgers and L. Bartram. Exploring ambient and artistic visualization for residential energy use feedback.IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 17(12):2489–2497, 2011. doi: 10.1109/TVCG. 2011.196

    2011 doi

  55. [63]

    F. Samsel. Art-science-visualization collaborations: Examining the spectrum. In IEEE VIS Arts Program. IEEE, 2013

    2013

  56. [64]

    Renzi, D

    A. Renzi, D. Offenhuber, N. Felde, C. Pietsch, Z. Siqi, and N. S. Grewal. Art of the March. https://cssh.northeastern.edu/nu lab/art-of-the-march/ . Accessed: Sept 1, 2024

    2024

  57. [65]

    Samsel, L

    F. Samsel, L. Deck, and B. Campbell. Climate prisms: The arctic connecting climate research and climate modeling via the language of art. In IEEE VIS Arts Program, pp. 38–43. IEEE, 2015

    2015

  58. [66]

    D. Sandin. Particle dreams in spherical harmonics. https://www.ev l.uic.edu/art/2039, 2011. Accessed: Sept 1, 2024

    2011

  59. [67]

    Samsel, L

    F. Samsel, L. Bartram, and A. Bares. Art, affect and color: Creating engaging expressive scientific visualization. InIEEE VIS Arts Program, pp. 1–9. IEEE, 2018. doi: 10.1109/VISAP45312.2018.9046053

    2018

  60. [68]

    Sarikaya, M

    A. Sarikaya, M. Correll, L. Bartram, M. Tory, and D. Fisher. What do we talk about when we talk about dashboards? IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 25(1):682–692, 2018. doi: 10. 1109/TVCG.2018.2864903

    2018

  61. [69]

    Schroeder and D

    D. Schroeder and D. F. Keefe. Visualization-by-sketching: An artist’s interface for creating multivariate time-varying data visual- izations. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 22(1):877–885, 2015. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2015.2467153

    2015

  62. [70]

    D. J. Sandin, T. DeFanti, L. Kauffman, and Y . Spielmann. The artist and the scientific research environment. Leonardo, 39(3):219–221,

  63. [71]

    Segel and J

    E. Segel and J. Heer. Narrative visualization: Telling stories with data. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics , 16(6):1139–1148, 2010. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2010.179

    2010 doi

  64. [72]

    W. Shi. Shan Shui in the world: A generative approach to traditional Chinese landscape painting. In IEEE VIS Arts Program, pp. 41–47. IEEE, 2016

    2016

  65. [73]

    Y . Shi, X. Lan, J. Li, Z. Li, and N. Cao. Communicating with mo- tion: A design space for animated visual narratives in data videos. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–13. ACM, 2021. doi: 10.1145/3411764.3445337

    2021

  66. [74]

    Sedlmair, M

    M. Sedlmair, M. Meyer, and T. Munzner. Design study methodology: Reflections from the trenches and the stacks. IEEE Transactions on Visualization and Computer Graphics, 18(12):2431–2440, 2012. doi: 10.1109/TVCG.2012.213

    2012 doi

  67. [75]

    T. Skog, S. Ljungblad, and L. E. Holmquist. Between aesthetics and utility: Designing ambient information visualizations. In IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, pp. 233–240. IEEE, 2003. doi: 10.1109/INFVIS.2003.1249031

    2003 arXiv

  68. [76]

    Decoding • Encod- ing

    A. Song, X. Song, Y . Chen, G. Luo, and Q. Li. "Decoding • Encod- ing"–an exploration of data narrative in Tibetan characters. In IEEE VIS Arts Program, pp. 85–86. IEEE, 2021. doi: 10.1109/VISAP52981. 2021.00015

    2021

  69. [77]

    Stoll, B

    E. Stoll, B. Ost, and D. Kammer. Investigating the role of interactivity for the aesthetic pleasure of information visualization. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Advanced Visual Interfaces, pp. 1–3,

  70. [78]

    Shusterman

    R. Shusterman. Pragmatist aesthetics: Living beauty, rethinking art. Rowman & Littlefield, 2000

    2000

  71. [79]

    Dan Sandin

    VDB. Dan Sandin. https://www.vdb.org/artists/dan-sandin. Accessed: Sept 1, 2024

    2024

  72. [80]

    F. B. Viégas and M. Wattenberg. Artistic data visualization: Beyond visual analytics. In Online Communities and Social Computing: Second International Conference, pp. 182–191. Springer, 2007. doi: 10.1007/ 978-3-540-73257-0_21

    2007

  73. [81]

    F. B. Viégas, E. Perry, E. Howe, and J. Donath. Artifacts of the presence era: Using information visualization to create an evocative souvenir. In IEEE Symposium on Information Visualization, pp. 105–111. IEEE,

  74. [82]

    Wattenberg and F

    M. Wattenberg and F. B. Vi’egas. Wind map. https://www.bewitc hed.com/windmap.html, 2012. Accessed: Sept 1, 2024

    2012

  75. [83]

    Tandon, A

    S. Tandon, A. Abdul-Rahman, and R. Borgo. Visual task performance and spatial abilities: An investigation of artists and mathematicians. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–16. ACM, 2023. doi: 10.1145/3544548.3580765

    2023

  76. [84]

    B. Willers. Show, don’t tell. In New Challenges for Data Design, pp. 3–22. Springer, 2014

    2014

  77. [85]

    R. Xu. Agitato. http://rebeccaxu.com/. Accessed: Sept 1, 2024

    2024

  78. [86]

    Refik Anadol is making machines hallucinate for his MoMA debut

    Yahoo. Refik Anadol is making machines hallucinate for his MoMA debut. https://uk.news.yahoo.com/refik-anadol-making-m achines-hallucinate-164530194.html , 2022. Accessed: Sept 1, 2024

    2022

  79. [87]

    J. E. Zhang, N. Sultanum, A. Bezerianos, and F. Chevalier. DataQuilt: Extracting visual elements from images to craft pictorial visualizations. In Proceedings of the CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1–13. ACM, 2020. doi: 10.1145/3313831.3376172

    2020

  80. [89]

    M. West. OceanForestAir. https://visap.net/2019/media/VIS AP19-Catalogue.pdf. Accessed: Sept 1, 2024

    2019

  81. [2004]

    doi: 10.1109/INFVIS.2004.8

    2004 doi

  82. [2006]

    doi: 10.1162/leon.2006.39.3.219

    2006 doi

  83. [2012]

    Accessed: Sept 1, 2024

    2024

  84. [2024]

    doi: 10.1145/3656650.3656715

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.