Pion condensation at non-zero isospin chemical potential with Wilson fermions

Bastian B. Brandt; Francesca Cuteri; Gergely Endr\H{o}di; Owe Philipsen; Rocco Francesco Basta

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 33 references

Pion condensation at non-zero isospin chemical potential with Wilson fermions

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Pion condensation turns on near $\mu_I \approx 0.47\,m_\pi$ with Wilson fermions.

desk verdict New Wilson-fermion data for the pion condensation onset provide a useful cross-check of the staggered picture, but the reported left shift is not yet robust against finite-λ and finite-volume effects. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.05051 v1 pith:BVIWOZNN submitted 2025-02-07 hep-lat

Rocco Francesco Basta , Bastian B. Brandt , Francesca Cuteri , Gergely Endrődi , Owe Philipsen This is my paper · ORCID

classification hep-lat

keywords pioncondensationisospinchemicalpotentialWilsonfermionsBanks-CasherrelationBose-EinsteincondensatelatticeQCDspectraldensityphasetransition

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper asks whether the pion-condensation transition of QCD at finite isospin chemical potential, previously seen only with staggered fermions, also occurs with Wilson fermions. Using two-flavour lattice QCD on a coarse lattice with $T \approx 79$ MeV and $m_\pi \approx 560$ MeV, the authors measure an improved pion condensate built from the low singular-value density of the Dirac operator. They find that the condensate turns on at $\mu_I/m_\pi \simeq 0.47$, slightly below the expected continuum value $\mu_{I,c} = m_\pi/2$, and the behaviour across the transition resembles the staggered result up to a multiplicative renormalization. If confirmed, this establishes that the BEC onset is a continuum-physics effect independent of the fermion discretization.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the improved pion condensate of Eq. (7), $\pi^\pm = \lim_{\lambda \to 0} \lim_{V \to \infty} (2T/V)\,\mathrm{Tr}[\lambda/(D^\dagger D + \lambda^2)] = \pi \langle \rho(0) \rangle$, a Banks-Casher-type identity that ties the chiral order parameter to the density of Dirac singular values at zero. The paper measures the lowest singular values of $D(\mu_I)$ on each gauge configuration with the Krylov-Schur algorithm, builds the integrated spectral density $N(\xi)$, and extrapolates $h(\xi) = \pi N(\xi)/(N_\tau N_\sigma^3 \xi)$ to $\xi \to 0$ to obtain $\langle \rho(0) \rangle$. This construction, originally introduced for staggered fermions, is what lets the authors read off the onset of pion condensation in a Wilson-fermion simulation.

What would settle it

On a finer lattice with the same physical parameters, check whether the extrapolated onset $\mu_{I,c}/m_\pi$ moves to 0.5 as the lattice spacing $a$ goes to zero; a persistent shift would disprove the claim that the observed left-shift is a lattice artifact. Alternatively, a direct calculation of the spectral density at $\mu_I$ slightly below $m_\pi/2$ with much larger volumes should find $h(\xi)$ extrapolating to exactly zero rather than to a small positive value.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that the pion condensate, defined through the Banks-Casher-like relation $\pi^\pm = \pi \langle \rho(0) \rangle$, becomes non-zero for $\mu_I/m_\pi \gtrsim 0.47$, signalling the entry into the pion condensation phase, whereas the continuum prediction is $\mu_{I,c} = m_\pi/2$. The onset is observed slightly to the left of that value, which the authors attribute to finite-size effects and lattice artifacts of the coarse lattice. The transition is seen in the histogram of the averaged spectral density $h(\xi) = \pi N(\xi)/(N_\tau N_\sigma^3 \xi)$, whose $\xi \to 0$ limit changes from zero to a positive value as $\mu_I$ increases across the transition. No $\lambda \to 0$ extrapolation has been performed in the spectral-density determination, although the direct condensate data are extrapolated linearly in $\lambda$ for $\lambda/m_{\mathrm{pcac}} \gtrsim 0.1$.

Load-bearing premise

The singular-value density near zero remains a trustworthy order parameter for the Wilson Dirac operator, so the small eigenvalues used to read off the condensate are uncontaminated by discretization artifacts.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

If the claim holds, the pion-condensation onset is confirmed to be independent of fermion discretization, strengthening the case that the BEC phase is genuine QCD physics.
The improved spectral-density order parameter can now be used in Wilson-fermion studies of the equation of state and of the BCS regime at higher $\mu_I$.
The measured onset shift of about 6% below $m_\pi/2$ at this coarse lattice spacing provides a quantitative benchmark for future finite-size and continuum-extrapolation studies.
Since Wilson fermions allow straightforward $O(a)$ improvement, this setup offers a path toward controlled continuum limits of the isospin-dense phase diagram.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

One testable extension would be to repeat the same measurement with clover-improved Wilson fermions at the same bare parameters; if the left-shift shrinks, it is likely a discretization artifact.
The spectral-density method might transfer to other sign-problem-free chemical potentials, such as a chiral or strangeness chemical potential, where a similar Banks-Casher relation could locate transitions.
If the onset shift does not tend to $\mu_I/m_\pi = 1/2$ in the continuum limit, that would point to a genuine $O(a)$ effect of the unimproved Wilson action, rather than a finite-volume effect.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

New here: actual Wilson-fermion data for the pion condensation onset, measured with the improved Banks-Casher operator. That is a worthwhile independent cross-check of the staggered results, and the comparison in Fig. 5 is informative. The paper is clearly written and honest about being preliminary; it does not oversell.

Where it holds up: the simulation setup is standard, the λ and volume dependence of the improved condensate is explored (Fig. 2) before the transition scan, and the qualitative statement that the onset appears near μ_I/mπ ≈ 0.5 is consistent with the staggered picture. The Banks-Casher relation in Eq. (7) is applied correctly, given the assumption that the spectral-density method transfers from staggered to Wilson fermions. That transfer is plausible, but I would want it checked: with Wilson fermions the quark mass renormalizes additively, and the relation between the singular spectrum of D(μ_I) and chiral symmetry breaking is less direct than for staggered.

The soft spots are all around the quantitative claim of a shift. The paper reports an onset slightly left of μ_I,c = mπ/2, around 0.47, but no uncertainty is given. The λ→0 extrapolation in Fig. 4 uses aλ = 0.05, 0.07, 0.09, i.e., λ/m_pcac ≈ 0.18–0.33. The paper's own Fig. 2 shows that below λ/m_pcac ≈ 0.1 the λ-dependence becomes nonlinear and volume-dependent. Extrapolating linearly from values above 0.18 can easily miss that curvature, so the apparent left shift might be a finite-λ artifact. The stress-test note is right that the λ→0 limit for the histogram observable that determines the onset is not executed; the fixed-λ histograms in Fig. 3 are not extrapolated. The λ→0 points in Fig. 4 do move the onset, but they rely on that same dangerous linear extrapolation. There is also no volume scan at the transition and no continuum extrapolation, so "lattice artifacts" as the explanation for the shift is asserted rather than demonstrated.

That said, this is a proceedings contribution, not a full paper. As a proceedings, the level of detail is reasonable, and the authors are transparent about what is missing. The central claim does not rest on a circular argument; the result is a fresh simulation, and comparison to [1] is the natural reference.

My recommendation: engage with it. If it comes as a proceedings contribution, it deserves a referee; for a full paper it would need more ensembles, a proper λ→0 extrapolation including smaller λ, and an uncertainty on the onset. The Wilson-fermion cross-check is worth publishing eventually.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. This manuscript, a LATTICE2024 proceedings contribution, reports preliminary two-flavour QCD simulations with unimproved Wilson fermions at nonzero isospin chemical potential mu_I. The action and determinant formulation are given in Sec. 2.1, and the pion condensate is studied through the singular-value spectral density, Eq. (7), following the improved definition introduced in Ref. [1]. After checking lambda- and volume-dependence at mu_I approx 0.7 m_pi (Sec. 3.1), the authors locate the BEC onset on an 8 x 24^3 lattice at T approx 79 MeV and m_pi approx 560 MeV from histograms of the spectral density (Sec. 3.2). They report the onset around mu_I/m_pi approx 0.47, slightly below the expected mu_{I,c} = m_pi/2, and compare with staggered-fermion results. The paper is explicitly preliminary and notes that no lambda -> 0 extrapolation has been performed for the histogram-based onset determination.

Significance. The result is potentially useful: it is among the first Wilson-fermion grand-canonical simulations of pion condensation, and a confirmation of the staggered-fermion onset pattern with an independent discretization would strengthen confidence in the BEC picture. The simulations are a fresh numerical effort, no parameter is fitted to force the onset, and the authors are transparent about the preliminary nature of the analysis, including the missing lambda -> 0 extrapolation and missing renormalization. These are real strengths. However, the paper's central quantitative statement, that the onset is slightly left of mu_I/m_pi = 0.5, is not yet supported by the presented evidence, because the relevant observable is evaluated at a single finite pion source and at a single volume and lattice spacing. The paper is therefore better read as a status report than as a completed determination of the onset.

major comments (3)

[Sec. 3.2, Fig. 3 and text after Eq. (11)] The onset around mu_I/m_pi approx 0.47 is obtained from spectral-density histograms taken at a single value a lambda = 0.05, corresponding to lambda/m_pcac approx 0.18, and the text immediately states that no lambda -> 0 extrapolation has been performed yet. A nonzero pion source both rounds the transition and shifts the pseudo-critical point. Unless the magnitude of this shift is estimated or bounded, the statement in the conclusions that the onset is 'slightly shifted to the left' of mu_{I,c} = m_pi/2 is not supported by the data. The lambda -> 0 extrapolation shown in Fig. 4 applies to condensate values at fixed mu_I and does not by itself determine where the extrapolated condensate crosses zero, especially if the extrapolation is nonlinear.
[Sec. 3.1 and Fig. 4] The linear lambda -> 0 extrapolation is performed over a lambda = 0.05, 0.07, 0.09, i.e. lambda/m_pcac approx 0.18-0.33, while Sec. 3.1 explicitly finds that below lambda/m_pcac approx 0.1 the lambda-dependence becomes nonlinear and volume dependent. The extrapolation therefore lies entirely outside the region where linear behavior has been established, and curvature at smaller lambda could move the zero crossing back toward m_pi/2. In addition, no statistical or systematic uncertainty is quoted for the onset location. The authors should either extend the extrapolation into, or demonstrate relevance of, the linear regime, or quote the onset with an uncertainty that includes the extrapolation systematics.
[Sec. 3.2] The volume dependence is studied only at mu_I approx 0.7 m_pi, deep inside the condensed phase, and not at the boundary. Since the conclusion attributes the left shift to finite-size effects and lattice artifacts, the paper needs at least one additional volume at the boundary, or a finite-size scaling argument, to support that attribution. A single lattice spacing a = 0.311(3) fm also precludes separating discretization effects from the physical dependence on mu_I/m_pi; this should be stated as a limitation of the onset claim.

minor comments (6)

[Fig. 3] The figure does not show error bars or a clear statement of how the histogram uncertainty enters the determination of nonzero <rho(0)>; the caption should describe the statistical treatment.
[Eq. (4)] The notation W and the rational approximations R[x] are used without fully specifying the definitions of lambda_k and the reweighting factor; a sentence clarifying this notation would help.
[Fig. 1 caption] The caption has missing spaces ('Schematicsketchoftheconjecturedphasediagram'); please fix the text.
[References] References [14], [15], and [17] are talk slides; if published versions exist, they should be cited instead.
[Sec. 3.2 and Fig. 4] The phrase 'no lambda -> 0 extrapolation has been performed yet' is easy to reconcile with Fig. 4 only if one notes that Fig. 4 extrapolates the condensate at fixed mu_I, not the spectral-density histograms; the text should say this explicitly.
[Fig. 5] The comparison with staggered results is only qualitative because the Wilson condensate is unrenormalized and no continuum limit is taken; the caption could state this more prominently.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the onset result is a fresh, independent simulation read from the data, not forced by a fitted parameter or by the self-cited method.

full rationale

The paper's central claim—the BEC onset near μ_I/m_π ≈ 0.47 for Wilson fermions at T ≈ 79 MeV—is produced by a new simulation (8×24^3 ensembles) in which the order parameter is measured directly from the spectral density of the Wilson Dirac operator. The improved condensate identity in Eq. (7) is derived in the paper from the Banks-Casher relation; the citation to [1] is attribution for the method, and the paper independently checks its λ and volume dependence in Fig. 2 for the Wilson case. The reference value μ_{I,c} = m_π/2 comes from external chiral perturbation theory [2], not from a fit to the data, and no parameter is tuned to place the onset. The ξ→0 and λ→0 extrapolations are standard regulator removals; the finite-λ and volume concerns raised about the onset are statistical/systematic uncertainties rather than circular reasoning. The self-citations to [1] and [30] are not load-bearing in the sense of forcing the quantitative outcome: the onset is read from the histograms and extrapolations, and the comparison with staggered results is a benchmark, not an input. Therefore no circular step is exhibited.

Assumptions & free parameters 2 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central result relies on standard lattice-QCD background and one external calibration: the Banks-Casher relation, the positivity of the determinant for lambda > 0, the chiral perturbation theory prediction mu_{I,c} = m_pi/2, and the lattice scale from [30]. The only hand-chosen numerical inputs are the pion source lambda and analysis settings for the spectral extrapolation; no phenomenological constants are fitted to the phase boundary. No new entities are introduced.

free parameters (2)

pion source term lambda = a lambda = 0.05, 0.07, 0.09
External source in Eq. (2) used to regulate near-zero modes and define the condensate. It is chosen by hand; the physical result is obtained by extrapolating to lambda->0. It is not fitted to the phase boundary.
spectral-density extrapolation settings = multiple bin sizes Delta xi and polynomial fit regions
The xi->0 extrapolation of N(xi)/xi in Section 2.2 depends on hand-chosen histogram bin sizes and fit ranges; results are model-averaged over chi^2 and degrees of freedom. These choices contribute systematic uncertainty to the quoted rho(0) values.

assumptions (5)

domain assumption Banks-Casher relation for the pion condensate, Eq. (7): pi_pm = (2T/V) Tr[lambda/(D^dagger D + lambda^2)] approaches pi rho(0) as V approaches infinity and lambda approaches 0.
Used in Section 2.2 to convert spectral density into the improved condensate. It is standard in lattice QCD but not proved in this paper and carries over from the staggered-fermion formulation of [1].
standard math Determinant identity det M_ud = det[D(mu_I)^dagger D(mu_I) + lambda^2], Eq. (3), assuming gamma5-Hermiticity of the Wilson Dirac operator so that the isospin chemical potential introduces no sign problem.
Invoked in Section 2.1 to justify a real positive determinant for lambda > 0.
domain assumption The expected continuum critical value mu_{I,c}(T=0) = m_pi/2 from chiral perturbation theory is used as the baseline for the observed onset.
Section 1 and Section 3.2 compare the numerical onset to this prediction; the assumption is that the continuum prediction applies at this unphysical pion mass up to O(a) corrections.
domain assumption The lattice calibration a = 0.311(3) fm, m_pi = 560(6) MeV, and T about 79 MeV from Ref. [30] for beta = 4.9228 and kappa = 0.1815 is correct.
Section 3 states these values are taken from [30]; all mu_I/m_pi axes and physical statements depend on this external calibration.
domain assumption The unrenormalized Wilson condensate differs from the staggered one by a multiplicative renormalization factor only, so the shape comparison in Fig. 5 is meaningful without explicit renormalization.
Section 3.2 and Fig. 5; not demonstrated in this paper, and additive mass renormalization in Wilson fermions could complicate the relation.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Pion condensation at non-zero isospin chemical potential with Wilson fermions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BVIWOZNN

@misc{pith2026250205051,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Pion condensation at non-zero isospin chemical potential with Wilson fermions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BVIWOZNN}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.05051}
}

read the original abstract

In contrast to the case of non-zero baryon chemical potential, the isospin chemical potential does not introduce a sign problem and can be simulated on the lattice. When the isospin chemical potential is large enough, a phase transition to a Bose-Einstein condensate of pions takes place. Currently available results in the literature on the phase diagram and the equation of state in this setup employ staggered fermions. We present preliminary results on the onset of the pion condensation phase in simulations with Wilson fermions.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.05051 by the authors.

**Figure 1.** Schematic sketch of the conjectured phase diagram of QCD at 𝜇𝐵 = 0, 𝜇𝐼 ≠ 0 in the (𝑇, 𝜇𝐼) plane, taken from [1]. The color scheme is the following: hadron phase (white), separated by the Quark-Gluon Plasma (yellow) by the thermal crossover (red dashed line), and by the pion condensation phase (blue). A further BCS phase (green) is predicted by perturbation theory. 1. Introduction The grand canonical partition functi… view at source ↗

**Figure 2.** Improved pion condensate at 𝜇𝐼 ≃ 0.7𝑚𝜋 on a 8 × 𝑁 3 𝜎 lattice as a function of 𝜆 and 𝑁𝜎. mass 𝑚ud by a multiplicative renormalization constant [32, 33]. We measure 𝑚pcac on a 244 lattice on 𝑂(200) configurations using wall sources, and 𝑎𝑚pcac = 0.27305(23). In principle, the physical case is recovered for 𝜆 → 0. However, 𝜆 ≠ 0 causes the pions to have a non-zero mass. If 𝜆 is too small, the pions are too light and t… view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** Averaged spectral density 𝜋𝑁(𝜉)/(𝑁𝜏𝑁 3 𝜎𝜉) at fixed 𝑎𝜆 = 0.05 (𝜆/𝑚pcac ≃ 0.18) and varying 𝜇𝐼 , before (left) and across (right) the BEC transition. 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 µI/mπ 0.0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 a 3hπ ±i mπ/2 aλ = 0.05 aλ = 0.07 aλ = 0.09 λ → 0 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (2 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: Improved pion condensate as a function of 𝜇𝐼/𝑚𝜋, including the 𝜆 → 0 extrapolation. transition, which starts to happen slightly before the expected continuum prediction of 𝜇𝐼,𝑐 = 𝑚𝜋/2 which is expected to hold in the thermodynamical and continuum limit. We show a compa…

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: (a): Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

33 extracted references · 15 canonical work pages

[1]

Brandt, G

B.B. Brandt, G. Endrodi and S. Schmalzbauer,QCD phase diagram for nonzero isospin-asymmetry, Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 054514 [1712.08190]

arXiv 2018
[2]

Son and M.A

D.T. Son and M.A. Stephanov,QCD at finite isospin density,Phys. Rev. Lett.86 (2001) 592 [hep-ph/0005225]

arXiv 2001
[3]

Kogut and D.K

J.B. Kogut and D.K. Sinclair,Quenched lattice QCD at finite isospin density and related theories, Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 014508 [hep-lat/0201017]. 7 Pion condensation at non-zero isospin chemical potential with Wilson fermionsRocco Francesco Basta

arXiv 2002
[4]

Kogut and D.K

J.B. Kogut and D.K. Sinclair,Lattice QCD at finite isospin density at zero and finite temperature, Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 034505 [hep-lat/0202028]

arXiv 2002
[5]

The finite temperature transition for 2-flavour lattice QCD at finite isospin density

J.B. Kogut and D.K. Sinclair,The Finite temperature transition for 2-flavor lattice QCD at finite isospin density,Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 094501 [hep-lat/0407027]

work page Pith review arXiv 2004
[6]

Endrödi,Magnetic structure of isospin-asymmetric QCD matter in neutron stars, Phys

G. Endrödi,Magnetic structure of isospin-asymmetric QCD matter in neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 094501 [1407.1216]

arXiv 2014
[7]

Searching for the BCS phase at nonzero isospin asymmetry

F. Cuteri, B.B. Brandt and G. Endrődi,Searching for the BCS phase at nonzero isospin asymmetry, PoS LATTICE2021(2022) 232 [2112.11113]

work page Pith review arXiv 2022
[8]

Brandt, F

B.B. Brandt, F. Cuteri and G. Endrodi,Equation of state and speed of sound of isospin-asymmetric QCD on the lattice, JHEP 07(2023) 055 [2212.14016]

arXiv 2023

Show all 33 references

[9]

Brandt, V

B.B. Brandt, V. Chelnokov, F. Cuteri and G. Endrődi,Pion condensation at lower than physical quark masses, PoS LATTICE2022(2023) 146 [2301.08607]

2023 arXiv
[10]

de Forcrand, M.A

P. de Forcrand, M.A. Stephanov and U. Wenger,On the phase diagram of QCD at finite isospin density, PoS LATTICE2007(2007) 237 [0711.0023]

2007 arXiv
[11]

Detmold, K

W. Detmold, K. Orginos and Z. Shi,Lattice QCD at non-zero isospin chemical potential, Phys. Rev. D86(2012) 054507 [1205.4224]

2012 arXiv
[12]

NPLQCD collaboration,Lattice quantum chromodynamics at large isospin density,Phys. Rev. D108 (2023) 114506 [2307.15014]

2023 arXiv
[13]

NPLQCD collaboration,QCD Constraints on Isospin-Dense Matter and the Nuclear Equation of State, Phys. Rev. Lett.134 (2025) 011903 [2406.09273]

2025 arXiv
[14]

Rindlisbacher and P

T. Rindlisbacher and P. de Forcrand,QCD with Wilson fermions and isospin chemical potential at zero and finite temperature, Talk presented at Lattice 2014, Link to slides

2014
[15]

Nonaka and M

C. Nonaka and M. Kondo,Lattice QCD at finite isospin chemical potential, Talk presented at Lattice 2013, Link to slides

2013
[16]

Nakamura and T

A. Nakamura and T. Takaishi,Simulation of Wilson fermion at finite isospin density, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.129 (2004) 629 [hep-lat/0310052]

2004 arXiv
[17]

Nonaka, P

C. Nonaka, P. de Forcrand and T. Rindlisbacher,Phase Diagram of QCD at finite isospin chemical potential with Wilson fermions, Talk presented at Lattice 2014, Link to slides

2014
[18]

Horowitz,Stochastic Quantization in Phase Space,Phys

A.M. Horowitz,Stochastic Quantization in Phase Space,Phys. Lett. B156 (1985) 89

1985
[19]

Horowitz,The second order Langevin equation and numerical simulations,Nucl

A.M. Horowitz,The second order Langevin equation and numerical simulations,Nucl. Phys. B 280 (1987) 510

1987
[20]

Horowitz,A Generalized guided Monte Carlo algorithm,Phys

A.M. Horowitz,A Generalized guided Monte Carlo algorithm,Phys. Lett. B268 (1991) 247. 8 Pion condensation at non-zero isospin chemical potential with Wilson fermionsRocco Francesco Basta

1991
[21]

K.JansenandC.Liu, KramersequationalgorithmforsimulationsofQCDwithtwoflavorsof WilsonfermionsandgaugegroupSU(2) ,Nucl.Phys.B 453(1995)375[ hep-lat/9506020]

1995 arXiv
[22]

Francis, P

A. Francis, P. Fritzsch, M. Lüscher and A. Rago,Master-field simulations of O(𝑎)-improved lattice QCD: Algorithms, stability and exactness,Comput. Phys. Commun.255 (2020) 107355 [1911.04533]

2020 arXiv
[23]

Clark and A.D

M.A. Clark and A.D. Kennedy,The RHMC algorithm for two flavors of dynamical staggered fermions, Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl.129(2004) 850 [hep-lat/0309084]

2004 arXiv
[24]

Hasenbusch,Speeding up the hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm for dynamical fermions, Phys

M. Hasenbusch,Speeding up the hybrid Monte Carlo algorithm for dynamical fermions, Phys. Lett. B519 (2001) 177 [hep-lat/0107019]

2001 arXiv
[25]

Hasenbusch and K

M. Hasenbusch and K. Jansen,Speeding up lattice QCD simulations with clover improved Wilson fermions,Nucl. Phys. B659(2003) 299 [hep-lat/0211042]

2003 arXiv
[26]

Luscher and S

M. Luscher and S. Schaefer,Lattice QCD with open boundary conditions and twisted-mass reweighting, Comput. Phys. Commun.184 (2013) 519 [1206.2809]

2013 arXiv
[27]

Bruno et al.,Simulation of QCD with N𝑓 =2+1 flavors of non-perturbatively improved Wilson fermions,JHEP 02 (2015) 043 [1411.3982]

M. Bruno et al.,Simulation of QCD with N𝑓 =2+1 flavors of non-perturbatively improved Wilson fermions,JHEP 02 (2015) 043 [1411.3982]

2015 arXiv
[28]

Lüscher,https://luscher.web.cern.ch/luscher/openQCD/

M. Lüscher,https://luscher.web.cern.ch/luscher/openQCD/
[29]

Hernandez, J.E

V. Hernandez, J.E. Roman and V. Vidal,SLEPc: A scalable and flexible toolkit for the solution of eigenvalue problems, ACM Trans. Math. Software31(2005) 351

2005
[30]

Philipsen and C

O. Philipsen and C. Pinke,The𝑁𝑓 = 2 QCD chiral phase transition with Wilson fermions at zero and imaginary chemical potential,Phys. Rev. D93(2016) 114507 [1602.06129]

2016 arXiv
[31]

Luscher, S

M. Luscher, S. Sint, R. Sommer and P. Weisz,Chiral symmetry and O(a) improvement in lattice QCD, Nucl. Phys. B478 (1996) 365 [hep-lat/9605038]

1996 arXiv
[32]

Fritzsch, J

P. Fritzsch, J. Heitger and N. Tantalo,Non-perturbative improvement of quark mass renormalization in two-flavour lattice QCD, JHEP 08(2010) 074 [1004.3978]

2010 arXiv
[33]

Brandt, A

B.B. Brandt, A. Francis, H.B. Meyer, O. Philipsen, D. Robaina and H. Wittig,On the strength of the𝑈𝐴(1) anomaly at the chiral phase transition in𝑁𝑓 = 2 QCD, JHEP 12 (2016) 158 [1608.06882]. 9

2016 arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Brandt, G

B.B. Brandt, G. Endrodi and S. Schmalzbauer,QCD phase diagram for nonzero isospin-asymmetry, Phys. Rev. D97(2018) 054514 [1712.08190]

arXiv 2018

[2] [2]

Son and M.A

D.T. Son and M.A. Stephanov,QCD at finite isospin density,Phys. Rev. Lett.86 (2001) 592 [hep-ph/0005225]

arXiv 2001

[3] [3]

Kogut and D.K

J.B. Kogut and D.K. Sinclair,Quenched lattice QCD at finite isospin density and related theories, Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 014508 [hep-lat/0201017]. 7 Pion condensation at non-zero isospin chemical potential with Wilson fermionsRocco Francesco Basta

arXiv 2002

[4] [4]

Kogut and D.K

J.B. Kogut and D.K. Sinclair,Lattice QCD at finite isospin density at zero and finite temperature, Phys. Rev. D66(2002) 034505 [hep-lat/0202028]

arXiv 2002

[5] [5]

The finite temperature transition for 2-flavour lattice QCD at finite isospin density

J.B. Kogut and D.K. Sinclair,The Finite temperature transition for 2-flavor lattice QCD at finite isospin density,Phys. Rev. D70(2004) 094501 [hep-lat/0407027]

work page Pith review arXiv 2004

[6] [6]

Endrödi,Magnetic structure of isospin-asymmetric QCD matter in neutron stars, Phys

G. Endrödi,Magnetic structure of isospin-asymmetric QCD matter in neutron stars, Phys. Rev. D90(2014) 094501 [1407.1216]

arXiv 2014

[7] [7]

Searching for the BCS phase at nonzero isospin asymmetry

F. Cuteri, B.B. Brandt and G. Endrődi,Searching for the BCS phase at nonzero isospin asymmetry, PoS LATTICE2021(2022) 232 [2112.11113]

work page Pith review arXiv 2022

[8] [8]

Brandt, F

B.B. Brandt, F. Cuteri and G. Endrodi,Equation of state and speed of sound of isospin-asymmetric QCD on the lattice, JHEP 07(2023) 055 [2212.14016]

arXiv 2023