Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

ASKAP EMU Radio Detection of the Reflection Nebula VdB-80 in the Monoceros Crossbones Filamentary Structure

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read A radio detection at 944 MHz reveals that the reflection nebula VdB-80 also hosts a compact HII region, named Lagotis, powered by the star HD 46060.

desk verdict A plausible new HII region detection from EMU, but the distance and spectral-index evidence are softer than the text suggests; worth refereeing. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.05299 v1 pith:CURSQDD2 submitted 2025-02-07 astro-ph.GA

A. C. Bradley , Z. J. Smeaton , N. F. H. Tothill , M. D. Filipović , W. Becker , A. M. Hopkins , B. S. Koribalski , S. Lazarević
show 4 more authors
D. Leahy G. Rowell V. Velović D. Urošević
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords HIIregionreflectionnebularadiocontinuumASKAPEMUGaiaparallaxCrossbonesmolecularcloudMonR2interstellarmedium
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper reports that the reflection nebula VdB-80, long known as a cloud lit by scattered starlight, also contains a compact radio-bright HII region, named Lagotis, detected at 944 MHz with ASKAP. The authors argue that the radio emission is thermal ionized gas powered solely by the B2 II star HD 46060, based on a distance of roughly 960 pc from Gaia parallaxes and on the match between the radio-derived Lyman photon rate ($10^{45.6}$ s$^{-1}$) and the star's expected ultraviolet output. If correct, VdB-80 is simultaneously a reflection nebula and an HII region, and the surrounding 'Crossbones' filament is not a single cloud but a chance superimposition of two clouds at different distances.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing mechanism is a quantitative consistency check among three independently measured quantities: the radio continuum flux, which yields the electron density through standard emission-measure relations; the Gaia parallax distance, which converts angular size to physical size; and the adopted B2 II spectral type of HD 46060, which sets the expected Lyman photon rate. The central object carrying the argument is the star HD 46060, whose position at the center of the radio feature and matching ionizing flux make it the unique power source; the HII region Lagotis is the detected radio counterpart, and its thermal spectral index ties the radio source to ionized gas.

What would settle it

Measure the trigonometric parallax of a maser in the molecular cloud adjacent to Lagotis, or obtain a high-resolution radio recombination-line map of the HII region to confirm its velocity matches the cloud's; a distance near 465 pc rather than 960 pc, or a velocity mismatch, would break the association between HD 46060, Lagotis, and the Crossbones cloud.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central discovery is a $30.2 \pm 3.1$ mJy, roughly semicircular radio-continuum source at 943.5 MHz precisely on the optical reflection nebula VdB-80. The spectrum between 944 MHz and 1.4 GHz is flat (spectral index $0.65 \pm 0.51$), consistent with thermal bremsstrahlung from an HII region. Using Gaia DR3 parallaxes for five cluster stars, the paper places the source at $960 \pm 100$ pc, giving a physical size of about $0.75 \times 0.67$ pc and an electron density of 26 cm$^{-3}$, which requires an ionizing photon flux of $10^{45.6}$ s$^{-1}$. That flux matches the expected Lyman-continuum output of HD 46060, the same B2 II star long proposed as the illuminator of VdB-80. The authors therefore conclude that HD 46060 both illuminates the reflection nebula and powers the newly named HII region Lagotis.

Load-bearing premise

The five Gaia stars are genuine cluster members inside the Crossbones cloud, so their error-weighted mean parallax distance of $960 \pm 100$ pc applies to the molecular gas and the HII region; if any of these stars is a foreground or background interloper, the derived size, density, and Lyman flux all change.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • VdB-80 must be reclassified as a system hosting both a reflection nebula and an HII region, implying that optical surveys alone underestimate the number of mixed-type nebulae.
  • The Crossbones structure is better described as a superposition of a foreground Orion-related filament and a background Mon R2-related cloud, changing the inferred star-forming history of the region.
  • The derived Lyman flux of HD 46060, $10^{45.6}$ s$^{-1}$, exceeds the zero-age-main-sequence value for its spectral type, which is consistent with the star's estimated age of roughly 4.5 Myr.
  • The asymmetric brightness of Lagotis hints at a champagne-flow geometry at the cloud edge; deeper multi-frequency radio observations could test this directly.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the two-cloud superposition is correct, the apparent velocity coherence of the Crossbones arms is likely a line-of-sight coincidence; mapping the proper motions of the two arms' molecular clumps could distinguish superposition from a physical connection.
  • The same flux-versus-spectral-type matching used here could be applied to other optically classified reflection nebulae in the EMU survey, potentially revealing more hidden HII regions around early B stars.
  • The Hipparcos-versus-Gaia distance discrepancy for this field could be settled by maser astrometry in the cloud itself, which would directly test whether the 960 pc distance truly applies to the molecular gas.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. Bradley et al. report the detection of 944 MHz radio continuum emission from the reflection nebula VdB-80 using ASKAP EMU, naming the source Lagotis and identifying it as a previously unknown HII region. They measure an integrated flux density of 30.2 mJy, estimate a spectral index of 0.65±0.51 from NVSS, and use Gaia DR3 parallaxes of five stars to adopt a distance of 960±100 pc. From this they derive a physical size of about 0.75×0.67 pc, an electron density of 26 cm^-3, and a Lyman flux of 10^45.6 s^-1, which they argue is consistent with the B2 II star HD 46060 as the ionizing source. They further conclude that the Crossbones molecular cloud is a superposition of two filamentary clouds, with Lagotis embedded in the far component.

Significance. If substantiated, the paper would provide a valuable example of a reflection nebula hosting a previously undetected HII region and demonstrate the ability of EMU to find low-surface-brightness radio sources. The multiwavelength data set (EMU, NVSS, WISE, AKARI, CO) is appropriate, and the basic derivation of physical parameters is transparent and uses standard equations without fitting free parameters to force agreement with stellar atmosphere models. However, the physical interpretation rests on a distance determination that is not yet securely established, and the spectral index is a weak discriminant of the thermal nature of the emission.

major comments (3)
  1. [3.2] The distance of 960±100 pc is derived from an error-weighted mean of five Gaia DR3 stars selected solely by their position within 40 arcseconds of HD 46060; no membership analysis relative to the ~150 Gaia sources in the field, no parallax zero-point correction, and no quantitative re-analysis of the Wilson et al. (2005) 465 pc Hipparcos result are provided. Because the Lyman flux scales as d^2 and the physical size scales as d, the claimed consistency with a B2 II star cannot discriminate 960 pc from 465 pc: at 465 pc the required flux would be ~10^45.0 s^-1, still inside the quoted B2 I-III range. The two-cloud Crossbones interpretation in Section 3.3 therefore rests on a distance that is not firmly established.
  2. [3.1] The spectral index of 0.65±0.51 (also quoted as 0.7±0.5 in Section 3.1) is only about 1.5σ away from the optically thin thermal value of -0.1, so the statement that it is 'consistent with thermal radio emission' is overstated; a positive spectral index of this magnitude could also arise from nonthermal processes or systematic flux-scale differences between EMU and NVSS. In addition, the abstract quotes the integrated flux as 30.2±0.3 mJy while Section 3.1 gives 30.2±3.1 mJy; this internal inconsistency must be corrected before the thermal interpretation can be assessed.
  3. [3.3] The claim that the Crossbones is a superposition of two filamentary clouds is presented as the 'most likely interpretation', yet the paper itself states that the only evidence against it is the lack of velocity discontinuity between the arms. Since the two-cloud scenario depends on the adopted distance and is used to place Lagotis in the far cloud, it should be explicitly framed as a tentative suggestion unless kinematic or additional distance evidence is supplied.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 1] Proper motions are listed without uncertainties; please add the quoted errors for μ(RA) and μ(DEC).
  2. [Table 2] The star name 'UCAC4 402-013961' appears to be a typo for 'UCAC4 402-013691' in Table 1 and Section 2.2.1; please correct.
  3. [Figure 2 caption] The caption states '943.5 GHz'; this should be MHz.
  4. [Abstract/Section 3.1] The spectral index is quoted as 0.65±0.51 in the abstract and 0.7±0.5 in Section 3.1; use one consistent value and error.
  5. [Throughout] The notation for the nebula is inconsistent ('V dB-80' versus 'VdB-80'); adopt a single form.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the Lyman-flux comparison is an external consistency check, not a fitted prediction, and the self-citations are not load-bearing.

full rationale

The paper's central derivation chain is self-contained against external benchmarks. The electron density and Lyman flux are obtained from the measured integrated radio flux, an assumed electron temperature of 10^4 K, and standard recombination physics from Dyson & Williams (1997) and Schmiedeke et al. (2016), then compared with the independent stellar-atmosphere grid of Panagia (1973). No free parameter is fitted to force this agreement; the adopted B2 II spectral type comes from prior literature (Houk & Swift 2000; Kharchenko 2001; Anderson & Francis 2012), not from the radio data. The distance of 960 pc is an assumption based on a positionally selected subset of five Gaia DR3 stars, supported by 2MASS extinction reddening, but whether that assumption is correct is a correctness risk, not a circular reduction. The paper's self-citations (Filipović et al. 2022, 2023; Lazarević et al. 2024a,b; Smeaton et al. 2024) serve as examples of EMU discoveries or as procedural references, and are not load-bearing evidence for the central claim. The admitted lack of CO velocity discontinuity is a limitation, not circularity. The derived Lyman flux and the quoted consistency with a B2 II star do not reduce to the paper's own inputs by construction.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The physical quantities are derived with standard radio recombination equations from public survey data. The main inputs are an assumed electron temperature, a geometric radius, Gaia parallaxes of five stars, and the adopted spectral type of HD 46060. No new physical entities are introduced; 'Lagotis' is a name for a newly identified HII region, not a new class of object.

free parameters (3)
  • IMCOMB weighting ratio = 1:1.5 (SB59692:SB61077)
    Hand-chosen in Section 2.1.1 to balance the noisier first epoch against the second when merging ASKAP images; influences the final image but not quantified.
  • Electron temperature T_e = 10^4 K (assumed)
    Assumed in Section 3.4 for the HII region; enters the Dyson & Williams (1997) and Schmiedeke et al. (2016) equations used to derive n_e and the Lyman flux. Different T_e would rescale both.
  • HII region radius = 0.49 pc
    Taken in Section 3.4 as the distance from HD 46060 to the edge of the bright radio emission; the HII region is not spherical, so this geometric choice affects n_e and Q.
assumptions (4)
  • domain assumption Gaia DR3 parallaxes are unbiased enough to invert as d=1/pi without applying a zero-point correction
    Section 3.2 derives distances from raw parallaxes in Table 1; the known Gaia DR3 parallax zero-point offset is not discussed, but for pi about 1.05 mas its effect is within the quoted uncertainty.
  • domain assumption The radio emission is optically thin thermal free-free radiation from a homogeneous HII region
    Section 3.4 uses standard recombination theory to convert the 944 MHz flux into emission measure, electron density (26 cm^-3) and Lyman photon rate; this is also the assumption that underpins the HII region classification.
  • domain assumption The five selected stars are embedded in the Crossbones cloud, so the Gaia distance applies to the molecular gas
    Section 3.2 uses the 2MASS extinction correlation to argue the stars and cloud are at the same distance; this transfers the stellar parallax distance to the cloud and drives the Crossbones reinterpretation.
  • domain assumption HD 46060 is a B2 II star and Panagia (1973) model fluxes apply
    Section 3.4 adopts B2 II from several competing classifications and compares the derived Lyman flux to Panagia's B2 I-III range to argue consistency.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of ASKAP EMU Radio Detection of the Reflection Nebula VdB-80 in the Monoceros Crossbones Filamentary Structure." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/CURSQDD2

@misc{pith2026250205299,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: ASKAP EMU Radio Detection of the Reflection Nebula VdB-80 in the Monoceros Crossbones Filamentary Structure},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/CURSQDD2}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.05299}
}
abstract

We present a new radio detection from the Australian Square Kilometre Array Pathfinder (ASKAP) Evolutionary Map of the Universe (EMU) survey associated with the reflection nebula (RN) VdB-80. The radio detection is determined to be a previously unidentified HII region, now named Lagotis. The RN is located towards Monoceros, centred in the molecular cloud feature known as the `Crossbones'. The 944 MHz EMU image shows a roughly semicircular HII region with an integrated flux density of 30.2$\pm$0.3 mJy. The HII region is also seen at 1.4 GHz by NVSS, yielding an estimated spectral index of 0.65$\pm$0.51, consistent with thermal radio emission. Gaia DR3 and 2MASS data give a distance to the stars associated with the HII region of $\sim$960 pc. This implies a size of 0.76$\times$0.68($\pm$0.09) pc for the HII region. We derive an HII region electron density of the bright radio feature to be 26 cm$^{-3}$, requiring a Lyman-alpha photon flux of $10^{45.6}$ s$^{-1}$, which is consistent with the expected Lyman flux of HD 46060, the B2II type star which is the likely ionising star of the region. The derived distance to this region implies that the Crossbones feature is a superposition of two filamentary clouds, with Lagotis embedded in the far cloud.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.05299 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. EMU radio-continuum image of Lagotis and VdB-80 at 944 MHz. Local RMS noise is 20 µJy beam–1, and contours are at levels of 3, 10 and 15σ. The image resolution is 15×15. ′′, represented with the yellow circle in the bottom left corner. The red ‘X’ denotes the star HD 46060, and the green crosses denote the other stars in the cluster (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. An RGB image tracing the near-infrared emission of VdB-80, where red is the EMU tile SB61077 (smoothed to a 25" resolution) at 943.5 GHz, green is the WISE W3 band (12µm) and blue is the WISE W4 band (22µm). movement, we give the HII region the designation ‘Lagotis’, as the stars are moving, or ‘burrowing’ into the HII region and the molecular cloudd . In the larger scope of the stellar cluster, there is a large pop… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. RGB composite image of the Crossbones filaments in far-infrared. Red is AKARI N160 (160 µm band), green is AKARI WIDE-L (140 µm band) and blue is AKARI WIDE-S (90 µm band). Contours in cyan are generated from the 12CO (J = 1–0) map provided by Ghosh et al. (2024). The black square in the image represents the size of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (1 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: RGB image of Lagotis HII region and VdB-80, where red is the EMU radio image (943.5 MHz), green is an AKARI wide-S band (90 µm) image, and blue is an AKARI wide-L band (140 µm) image. The red ‘X’ denotes the star HD 46060, and the green crosses denote the other stars i…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Study of a giant Large Magellanic Cloud Supernova Remnant, Veliki (J0450.4-7050)

    astro-ph.HE 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The LMC supernova remnant Veliki is measured to be one of the largest known, with a flat radio spectral index alpha=-0.26±0.02, interpreted as an old, fully radiative remnant with high shock compression and thermal br...

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

45 extracted references · 36 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    V., Clariá, J

    Ahumada, A. V., Clariá, J. J., Bica, E., Dutra, C. M., & Torres, M. C. 2001, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 377, 845

    work page 2001

  2. [2]

    A., Hussein, A

    Al-Wardat, M. A., Hussein, A. M., Al-Naimiy, H. M., & Barstow, M. A. 2021, Publications of the Astronomical society of Australia, 38, e002

    work page 2021

  3. [3]

    2012, Astronomy Letters, 38, 331

    Anderson, E., & Francis, C. 2012, Astronomy Letters, 38, 331

    work page 2012

  4. [4]

    F., & Hunter, J

    Aveni, A. F., & Hunter, J. H. 1972, The Astronomical Journal, 77, 17

    work page 1972

  5. [5]

    Bodenheimer, P., Tenorio-Tagle, G., & Y orke, H. W. 1979, The Astrophysical Journal, 233, 85

    work page 1979

  6. [6]

    2009, MNRAS, 397, 1915

    Bonatto, C., & Bica, E. 2009, MNRAS, 397, 1915

    work page 2009

  7. [7]

    2024, Astronomy & Astro- physics, 684, A150

    Burger-Scheidlin, C., Brose, R., Mackey, J., et al. 2024, Astronomy & Astro- physics, 684, A150

    2024

  8. [8]

    1997, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 326, 1195

    Comeron, F. 1997, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 326, 1195

    work page 1997

Show all 45 references
  1. [9]

    J., Cotton, W

    Condon, J. J., Cotton, W. D., Greisen, E. W., et al. 1998, The Astronomical Journal, 115, 1693

    1998

  2. [10]

    M., Ungerechts, H., Cohen, R

    Dame, T. M., Ungerechts, H., Cohen, R. S., et al. 1987, The Astrophysical Journal, 322, 706

    1987

  3. [11]

    2015, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 67, 50

    Doi, Y., Takita, S., Ootsubo, T., et al. 2015, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 67, 50

    2015

  4. [12]

    E., & Williams, D

    Dyson, J. E., & Williams, D. A. 1997, The physics of the in- terstellar medium (Bristol, Philadelphia, Institute of Physics Pub), doi:10.1201/9780585368115

    1997 doi

  5. [13]

    M., Caputo, M., Lai, T

    Eiermann, J. M., Caputo, M., Lai, T. S. Y., & Witt, A. N. 2024, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 529, 1680 Filipović, M. D., & Tothill, N. F. H. 2021a, Multimessenger Astronomy in Practice, doi:10.1088/2514-3433/ac2256 —. 2021b, Principles of Multimessenger A...

    2024 doi

  6. [14]

    2006, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro- nomical Society, 369, 1901

    Froebrich, D., & del Burgo, C. 2006, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astro- nomical Society, 369, 1901

    2006

  7. [15]

    C., Smith, M

    Froebrich, D., Murphy, G. C., Smith, M. D., Walsh, J., & Del Burgo, C. 2007, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 378, 1447 Publications of the Astronomical Society of Australia 9 Gaia Collaboration, Prusti, T., de Bruijne, J. H. J., et al. 2016, Astronomy & Astr...

    2007

  8. [16]

    2024, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 688, A54

    Ghosh, S., Remazeilles, M., & Delabrouille, J. 2024, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 688, A54

    2024

  9. [17]

    2019, ASKAPsoft: ASKAP science data processor software, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1912.003

    Guzman, J., Whiting, M., V oronkov, M., et al. 2019, ASKAPsoft: ASKAP science data processor software, Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1912.003

    2019

  10. [18]

    W., Bunton, J

    Hotan, A. W., Bunton, J. D., Chippendale, A. P., et al. 2021, Publications of the Astronomical society of Australia, 38, e009

    2021

  11. [19]

    2000, VizieR Online Data Catalog: Michigan Cat- alogue of HD stars, V ol.5 (Houk+, 1999), VizieR On-line Data Catalog: III/214

    Houk, N., & Swift, C. 2000, VizieR Online Data Catalog: Michigan Cat- alogue of HD stars, V ol.5 (Houk+, 1999), VizieR On-line Data Catalog: III/214. Originally published in: Department of Astronomy, University of

    2000

  12. [20]

    Michigan, Ann Arbor Michigan (1999)

    1999

  13. [21]

    J., & Menten, K

    Immer, K., Cyganowski, C., Reid, M. J., & Menten, K. M. 2014, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 563, A39

    2014

  14. [22]

    I., Churazov, E

    Khabibullin, I. I., Churazov, E. M., Bykov, A. M., Chugai, N. N., & Sunyaev, R. A. 2023, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 521, 5536

    2023

  15. [23]

    Kharchenko, N. V. 2001, Kinematika i Fizika Nebesnykh Tel, 17, 409

    2001

  16. [24]

    G., Kawamura, A., Y onekura, Y., & Fukui, Y

    Kim, B. G., Kawamura, A., Y onekura, Y., & Fukui, Y. 2004, Publications of the Astronomical Society of Japan, 56, 313

    2004

  17. [25]

    J., & Reich, W

    Kothes, R., Reich, P., Foster, T. J., & Reich, W. 2017, Astronomy & Astro- physics, 597, A116 Lazarević, S., Filipović, M. D., Koribalski, B. S., et al. 2024a, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 8, 107 Lazarević, S., Filipović, M. D., Dai, S., et al. 2024b, P...

    2017

  18. [26]

    Lee, H.-T., & Chen, W. P. 2009, The Astrophysical Journal, 694, 1423

    2009

  19. [27]

    J., Morris, M., Moskowitz, J., & Thaddeus, P

    Maddalena, R. J., Morris, M., Moskowitz, J., & Thaddeus, P. 1986, The Astrophysical Journal, 303, 375

    1986

  20. [28]

    Magakian, T. Y. 2003, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 399, 141

    2003

  21. [29]

    E., & Graham, J

    Mueller, K. E., & Graham, J. A. 2000, Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 112, 1426

    2000

  22. [30]

    P., Hopkins, A

    Norris, R. P., Hopkins, A. M., Afonso, J., et al. 2011, Publications of the Astronomical society of Australia, 28, 215

    2011

  23. [31]

    P., Marvil, J., Collier, J

    Norris, R. P., Marvil, J., Collier, J. D., et al. 2021, Publications of the Astro- nomical society of Australia, 38, e046

    2021

  24. [32]

    1980, Bulletin d’Information du Centre de Donnees Stellaires, 19, 74

    Ochsenbein, F. 1980, Bulletin d’Information du Centre de Donnees Stellaires, 19, 74

    1980

  25. [33]

    B., De Biasi, M

    Orellana, R. B., De Biasi, M. S., Paíz, L. G., Bustos Fierro, I. H., & Calderón, J. H. 2015, New A, 36, 70

    2015

  26. [34]

    1973, The Astronomical Journal, 78, 929

    Panagia, N. 1973, The Astronomical Journal, 78, 929

    1973

  27. [35]

    2016, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 461, 22

    Pokhrel, R., Gutermuth, R., Ali, B., et al. 2016, Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 461, 22

    2016

  28. [36]

    1968, The Astrophysical Journal, 73, 233

    Racine, R. 1968, The Astrophysical Journal, 73, 233

    1968

  29. [37]

    A., & Kurchakov, A

    Rozhkovskij, D. A., & Kurchakov, A. V. 1968, Trudy Astrofizicheskogo Instituta Alma-Ata, 11, 3

    1968

  30. [38]

    J., Teuben, P

    Sault, R. J., Teuben, P. J., & Wright, M. C. H. 1995, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, V ol. 77, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems IV, ed. R. A. Shaw, H. E. Payne, & J. J. E. Hayes, 433

    1995

  31. [39]

    2016, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 588, A143

    Schmiedeke, A., Schilke, P., Möller, T., et al. 2016, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 588, A143

    2016

  32. [40]

    1984, The Astrophysical Journal, 277, 623

    Sellgren, K. 1984, The Astrophysical Journal, 277, 623

    1984

  33. [41]

    F., Cutri, R

    Skrutskie, M. F., Cutri, R. M., Stiening, R., et al. 2006, The Astronomical Journal, 131, 1163

    2006

  34. [42]

    J., Filipović, M

    Smeaton, Z. J., Filipović, M. D., Koribalski, B. S., et al. 2024, Research Notes of the American Astronomical Society, 8, 158 van den Bergh, S. 1966, The Astronomical Journal, 71, 990

    2024

  35. [43]

    E., Gatley, I., Hildebrand, R

    Whitcomb, S. E., Gatley, I., Hildebrand, R. H., et al. 1981, The Astrophysical Journal, 246, 416

    1981

  36. [44]

    A., Dame, T

    Wilson, B. A., Dame, T. M., Masheder, M. R. W., & Thaddeus, P. 2005, Astronomy & Astrophysics, 430, 523

    2005

  37. [45]

    L., Eisenhardt, P

    Wright, E. L., Eisenhardt, P. R. M., Mainzer, A. K., et al. 2010, The Astro- nomical Journal, 140, 1868

    2010

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.