Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 6 minor 54 references

Anomalous Reynolds stress and dynamic mechanisms in two-dimensional elasto-inertial turbulence of viscoelastic channel flow

T0 review · 3 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read In two-dimensional elasto-inertial turbulence of a viscoelastic channel flow, the Reynolds stress is negative over much of the channel and grows in magnitude with the Weissenberg number, opposite to inertial turbulence.

desk verdict A plausible but under-verified negative Reynolds stress claim in 2D EIT, wrapped in a solid statistical characterization that deserves a referee's time. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.05522 v1 pith:X5QVBRE3 submitted 2025-02-08 physics.flu-dyn

Haotian Cheng , Hongna Zhang , Wenhua Zhang , Suming Wang , Yuke Li , Xiaobin Li , Fengchen Li This is my paper · ORCID
classification physics.flu-dyn
keywords elasto-inertialturbulencetwo-dimensionalviscoelasticchannelflowFENE-PmodelReynoldsstressquadrantanalysispolymerextensionsheetsturbulentkineticenergybudget
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper tries to establish that two-dimensional elasto-inertial turbulence (EIT) in a viscoelastic channel flow has a genuinely anomalous momentum balance: the Reynolds stress $\tau_R=-u'v'$ is negative across most of the channel and grows in magnitude as the Weissenberg number increases, exactly opposite to inertial turbulence and to reported three-dimensional EIT. The authors attribute the reversal to the dominance of first- and third-quadrant velocity fluctuations tied to inclined polymer sheet-like extension structures, and they show that elasticity strengthens EIT in 2D whereas it progressively suppresses inertial turbulence in 3D. If correct, the result would define a clean two-dimensional regime in which elasticity alone sustains turbulence, and it would support the claim that the familiar three-dimensional maximum-drag-reduction state is not pure EIT, since its Reynolds stress stays non-negative. This matters because it gives a quantitative statistical signature that distinguishes elasto-inertial from inertial turbulence and offers a benchmark for experimental and numerical identification of EIT.

What carries the argument

The central object is the quadrant-resolved Reynolds stress inside the stress balance $\tau_R+\tau_e+\tau_v=\tau_{\mathrm{total}}$, resolved by splitting velocity fluctuations into four quadrants: Q1 (outward high-speed motion), Q2 (low-speed ejection), Q3 (inward low-speed motion), and Q4 (high-speed sweep). The key identity is that the sign of $\tau_R$ is set by which quadrant pair dominates, and the paper shows that growing $Wi$ suppresses Q2/Q4 and enhances Q1/Q3, the latter aligned with the inclined polymer sheet-like extension structures; this inversion is what makes $\tau_R$ negative. The dynamical machinery is completed by the TKE and elastic-energy budgets $P_k-\varepsilon_k-G=0$ and $P_e-\varepsilon_e+G=0$, where the transfer term $-G$ from polymer elastic energy to turbulent kinetic energy is the dominant production channel, and by a pressure decomposition into rapid, slow, polymer, and Stokes parts that shows the polymer pressure dominating wall-normal redistribution at high $Wi$. A tensor-based interpolation scheme that preserves the conformation tensor's positive definiteness allows the simulations to reach the high-$Wi$ regime without artificial diffusion.

What would settle it

Double the grid resolution and the domain length at $Wi=100$ and $200$ and recompute $\tau_R(y)$ over a much longer averaging window; if the negative Reynolds stress disappears, changes sign, or shifts substantially, the claim fails. An independent check is whether the joint probability density of $(u',v')$ keeps its oblique Q1/Q3 elongation under these changes.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

Using direct numerical simulations of two-dimensional plane Poiseuille flow of a FENE-P (finitely extensible nonlinear elastic-Peterlin) viscoelastic fluid at $Re=2000$ and $Wi$ from 10 to 200, the authors find that increasing elasticity intensifies EIT rather than suppressing inertial turbulence: mean velocity profiles deviate further from the laminar state and converge to an asymptotic $u^+=6\ln y^+ + 1.5$ that is neither the Newtonian log law nor the Virk maximum-drag-reduction asymptote. The load-bearing statistical result is the stress balance $\tau_R+\tau_e+\tau_v=\tau_{\mathrm{total}}$: the elastic stress $\tau_e$ grows monotonically with $Wi$ and peaks between $y=0.2$ and $0.3$, while the Reynolds stress $\tau_R$ is consistently negative, grows in magnitude with $Wi$, and saturates at high $Wi$. Quadrant analysis attributes the negative sign to the prevalence of Q1 and Q3 motions arranged along the polymer extension sheets inclined from the near-wall region toward the channel centre, with the usual Q2/Q4 ejection-sweep events of inertial turbulence suppressed. The energy budgets show that turbulent kinetic energy is produced almost entirely by the transfer from polymer elastic energy ($-G$), not by the Reynolds-stress production term $P_k$, which is negative, and the polymer contribution to pressure-strain redistribution dominates at high $Wi$. The authors take these 2D/3D budget similarities as evidence that 2D EIT is the objective, purely elastic-inertial state that coexists with residual dynamics in the 3D drag-reducing regime.

Load-bearing premise

The central claim depends on the 2D simulations at $Wi$ up to 200 being fully developed, spatially resolved, and statistically converged; the paper uses one domain length and grid from prior work and gives no convergence or sampling diagnostics.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • Reynolds stress contributes negatively to flow resistance in 2D EIT, so drag is carried almost entirely by viscous and elastic stresses and the standard inertial-turbulence momentum-transport picture does not apply there.
  • Velocity profiles in 2D EIT converge to an asymptotic form $u^+\approx 6\ln y^+ + 1.5$, distinct from both the Newtonian log law and the Virk MDR asymptote, marking 2D EIT as a separate regime.
  • Because $P_k$ is negative while $-G$ dominates TKE production, Reynolds-stress production cannot sustain 2D EIT; polymer elastic energy is the energy source, with polymer pressure dominating redistribution at high $Wi$.
  • The TKE spectrum follows $k^{-\alpha}$ with $\alpha>3$, converging at high $Wi$ to exponents such as $-11/3$, $-19/6$, and $-13/3$ at different wall distances, linking 2D EIT to elastic-turbulence spectral decay rather than inertial ranges.
  • The 2D/3D budget similarities imply that the 3D maximum-drag-reduction state is not pure EIT; the residual non-EIT dynamics in 3D are what keep its Reynolds stress non-negative.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the negative Reynolds stress survives independent grid refinement and longer averaging, a natural next test is its dependence on polymer extensibility $L$ and viscosity ratio $\beta$; the paper itself leaves the parametric sensitivity of the 2D asymptotic state open.
  • The Q1/Q3 dominance suggests a measurable experimental signature in quasi-2D or thin-film viscoelastic flows: the joint probability density of $(u',v')$ should become obliquely elongated along the Q1/Q3 diagonal, unlike the Q2/Q4 elongation seen in inertial wall turbulence.
  • The spectral exponents between $-11/3$ and $-14/3$ could serve as a quantitative diagnostic for identifying pure EIT in experimental velocity or concentration spectra, independent of the sign of the Reynolds stress.
  • Generalizing the stress-balance sign test to three dimensions, one could search for local regions of negative Reynolds stress near polymer sheets in 3D simulations; their absence would confirm that residual inertial dynamics distinguish 3D MDR from pure EIT.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports two-dimensional (2D) direct numerical simulations of FENE-P viscoelastic channel flow at Re=2000, beta=0.9, L=100, for Wi from 2 to 200, and characterizes the resulting elasto-inertial turbulence (EIT). The central claims are that, in contrast to 3D EIT and inertial turbulence, 2D EIT exhibits a negative Reynolds stress tau_R=-u'v'; that this negative stress arises from dominance of first- and third-quadrant velocity fluctuations associated with inclined polymer sheet-like structures; and that energy budgets, pressure redistribution, and spectral power laws of 2D EIT are sufficiently similar to those of 3D EIT to establish the 'objective existence of the 2D nature of EIT.' The paper also reports a mean velocity profile that shifts downward with Wi and appears to approach a logarithmic asymptote u+=6 ln y+ + 1.5, and spectra with exponents such as -11/3, -19/6, and -13/3.

Significance. If the negative Reynolds stress is robust, the finding is significant for the physics of EIT because it contradicts the usual positive sign of tau_R in inertial turbulence and in reported 3D EIT/DRT states, and it suggests a distinct momentum transport mechanism in 2D EIT. The paper also provides a useful systematic data set over a wide Wi range and applies standard diagnostic tools (stress balance, quadrant analysis, TKE/TEE budgets, pressure decomposition, spectra) that are appropriate for characterizing the flow. The in-house solver uses a tensor-based interpolation method that is intended to preserve the invariants and positive definiteness of the conformation tensor, which is a strength if the associated validation is supplied. However, the central observation rests on single-run statistics without uncertainty quantification or resolution/domain convergence checks, and several asymptotic and spectral claims are made by visual inspection rather than quantitative fitting.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.3, §3.1, Fig. 3(c)] The central claim that tau_R=-u'v' is negative in 2D EIT is not supported by any statistical uncertainty quantification. The paper states only that tau_R is 'significantly lower than the other stresses,' but the reported magnitude is small, and the sign of a small time-averaged quantity is precisely what can be biased by finite sampling, large-scale intermittency, or incomplete convergence. The averaging time is not reported, no block averaging or confidence intervals are given, and the grid (1024x304), time step, and domain length (20h) are adopted from prior work without repeating grid-independence, time-step, or domain-size checks for the present Wi range. This is particularly concerning at Wi=200, where the mean polymer extension approaches 90% of L, so under-resolution of highly extended polymer sheets could distort the stress balance and quadrant statistics. To make the anomalous Reynolds stress claim load-bearing, the authors need to report convergence diagnostics and error bars on tau_R and on the quadrant contributions, including tests at higher resolution, smaller time step, longer domain, and longer averaging windows.
  2. [§3.1, Fig. 1] The statement that the mean velocity profile 'ultimately converging to a distinct asymptotic regime (u+=6 ln y+ +1.5) when Wi=200' is based on a single Wi value and appears to be a visual fit to the profile. No fitting procedure, uncertainty, or additional higher-Wi case is shown, even though the text mentions Wi=1000 data that are not presented. Since the asymptotic regime is used to support the interpretation of 2D EIT as a distinct regime with no MDR-like convergence, the claim needs either a quantitative fit with confidence bounds or additional data at higher Wi demonstrating that the profile has stopped changing.
  3. [§3.5, Fig. 13] The spectral power-law exponents (-11/3, -19/6, -13/3) are key evidence for the proposed dynamic regime, but the manuscript does not explain how the exponents are estimated. The text refers to 'converging power-law decay' and 'the converging power-law decay of 2D EIT is k^{-11/3} within k>10,' yet no fits are drawn in Fig. 13, no fitting ranges are defined by a reproducible criterion, and no uncertainties are provided. Because the exponents are used both to compare 2D and 3D EIT and to connect EIT with elastic turbulence, the analysis should include a quantitative fitting procedure and error estimates, or the claims should be weakened to qualitative statements.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Abstract] The phrase 'remain scare' should be 'remain scarce.'
  2. [Eq. (3.1)] The notation (·) for ensemble averaging is undefined; specify that averages are taken over time and the homogeneous streamwise direction (and possibly over realizations).
  3. [§2.1] The adjective 'imcompressible' in the first sentence is a typo for 'incompressible.'
  4. [§3.2] The phrase 'ejection and sweep motions motions' contains a duplicated word.
  5. [References] The reference list gives 'Warholic, M. D., Massah, H., & Hanratty, T. J. 2021' but the text cites Warholic et al. (1999) for the MDR-state Reynolds stress measurement; the year and entry should be corrected for consistency.
  6. [Figs. 6 and 7] The labels in the probability-density contours and the superimposed vector fields are difficult to read at the printed size; please enlarge panels, define the color scale, and state explicitly which arrows correspond to Q1 and Q3 motions.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the anomalous Reynolds stress is a directly measured DNS output, not a fitted or self-defined quantity.

full rationale

The paper's central result—negative Reynolds stress in 2D EIT (Section 3.1, Figure 3c)—is a direct DNS output computed from the standard definition tau_R = -<u'v'> in Eq. (3.1). It is not fitted from any parameter, nor is it constructed from a target value, so the central claim is not circular by construction. The quadrant analysis in Section 3.2 decomposes this measured quantity and is therefore a diagnostic restatement rather than an independent prediction; however, the paper does not use the quadrant decomposition to derive tau_R from a fitted input, and the decomposition itself follows the standard definition of Reynolds-stress quadrants. Numerical parameters (domain length 20h, grid 1024x304, time step) are inherited from the authors' prior work (Zhang et al. 2024), and several interpretive concepts such as 'effective elasticity' and the self-sustaining cycle are self-cited; nevertheless, these self-citations support the numerical setup and background interpretation, not the sign or magnitude of tau_R, and the paper also benchmarks against independent works (Shekar et al. 2020; Zhu et al. 2021; Sid et al. 2018). The log-law and spectral exponents are empirical fits to the same data they are used to characterize, but they are presented as descriptive characterizations, not as predictions of withheld data. No equation in the paper reduces the claimed anomalous Reynolds stress to its own inputs, so no circular step is present.

Assumptions & free parameters 4 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

No independent external benchmarks are provided. The central claims rest on the authors' in-house code, their prior validation papers, and visual estimates of asymptotic slopes and spectral exponents. The negative Reynolds stress itself is a direct simulation output, but the interpretation of it as a pure EIT mechanism depends on several unverified numerical and modeling assumptions.

free parameters (4)
  • log-law constants for 2D EIT mean velocity profile = 6 and 1.5 in u+ = 6 ln y+ + 1.5
    Presented as the asymptotic profile at Wi=200 in Figure 1; no fitting procedure or uncertainty is given, and sensitivity to Re, beta, and L is explicitly left to future work.
  • near-wall spectral exponent alpha = 11/3
    Read from the slopes in Figure 13a,b for k>10 at high Wi; used as evidence of EIT spectral universality.
  • mid-channel spectral exponent alpha = 19/6
    Read from Figure 13c over k about 4 to 80; central to the claim that EIT dynamics dominate at y=0.4.
  • centerline spectral exponent alpha = 13/3
    Read from Figure 13d over k about 5 to 60; compared with 3D EIT spectra from the literature.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption FENE-P with L=100, beta=0.9, and Re=2000 is a faithful model of the polymer solution in the EIT regime.
    Invoked in Section 2.1; no experimental validation in this parameter range is provided.
  • domain assumption 2D DNS isolates pure EIT by eliminating inertial turbulence.
    Section 3.1 states that turbulence generation is exclusively governed by elasto-inertial instability; this follows from prior work, not from independent data presented here.
  • domain assumption The 20h x 2h domain and 1024x304 grid are sufficient for fully developed EIT at Wi up to 200.
    Section 2.3 adopts these from Zhang et al. 2024 without repeating grid or domain convergence checks for the reported statistics.
  • domain assumption Long-time ensemble averages are converged.
    No convergence or stationarity diagnostics are shown; the sign of tau_R and the quadrant statistics depend on this assumption.
  • domain assumption The tensor-based interpolation and WENO scheme solve the high-Weissenberg problem without artificial diffusion.
    Section 2.2 cites this solver component to Zhang et al. 2023; it is not independently verified in this paper.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Anomalous Reynolds stress and dynamic mechanisms in two-dimensional elasto-inertial turbulence of viscoelastic channel flow." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/X5QVBRE3

@misc{pith2026250205522,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Anomalous Reynolds stress and dynamic mechanisms in two-dimensional elasto-inertial turbulence of viscoelastic channel flow},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/X5QVBRE3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.05522}
}
read the original abstract

Elasto-inertial turbulence (EIT) has been demonstrated to be able to sustain in two-dimensional (2D) channel flow; however the systematic investigations on 2D EIT remain scare. This study addresses this gap by examining the statistical characteristics and dynamic mechanisms of 2D EIT, while exploring its similarities to and differences from three-dimensional (3D) EIT. We demonstrate that the influence of elasticity on the statistical properties of 2D EIT follows distinct trends compared to those observed in 3D EIT and drag-reducing turbulence (DRT). These differences can be attributed to variations in the underlying dynamical processes. As nonlinear elasticity increases, the dominant dynamic evolution in 3D flows involves the gradual suppression of inertial turbulence (IT). In contrast, 2D flows exhibit a progressive enhancement of EIT. More strikingly, we identify an anomalous Reynolds stress in 2D EIT that contributes negatively to flow resistance, a behavior opposite to that of IT. Quadrant analysis of velocity fluctuations reveals the predominance of motions in the first and third quadrants. These motions are closely associated with polymer sheet-like extension structures, which are inclined from the near-wall region toward the channel center along the streamwise direction. Finally, we present the dynamical budget of 2D EIT, which shows significant similarities to that of 3D EIT, thereby providing compelling evidence for the objective existence of the 2D nature of EIT.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.05522 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Mean velocity profiles normalized by the inner scale under different Wi. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Distributions of r.m.s. of velocity fluctuations at different Wi. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Distributions of three kinds of stress at different Wi. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p009_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (10 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: (a) Distributions of mean polymer extension Tr( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Quadrant distributions of Reynolds stress at different [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p011_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Probability density distribution contours of four quadrant components at [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_6.png]
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Superposition of the instantaneous extension and the fluctuating velocity vector [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p013_7.png]
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Profiles of turbulent kinetic energy budget at different Wi. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p014_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: Profiles of elastic energy budget at different Wi. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Pressure r.m.s. distribution along the wall-normal direction with different Wi: [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p017_10.png]
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Distribution of the ratio of 𝑝 𝑆 𝑟𝑚𝑠 to (𝑝 𝑅 𝑟𝑚𝑠 + 𝑝 𝑆 𝑟𝑚𝑠) along the wall-normal direction. 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 6 3 0 3 6 ×10 4 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 2 1 0 1 2 ×10 4 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 8 4 0 4 8 ×10 5 0.0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1.0 6 3 0 3 6 ×10 4 10 20 40 60 80 …
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Distribution of wall-normal pressure-strain component [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p018_12.png]
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: Energy spectrum at different Wi and wall-normal positions. [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p020_13.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

54 extracted references · 42 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    Beneitez, M., Page, J., & Kerswell, R. R. 2023 Polymer diffusive instability leading to elastic turbulence in plane Couette flow . Phys. Rev. Fluids , 8 , L101901

    work page 2023

  2. [2]

    Beneitez, M., Page, J., Dubief, Y., & Kerswell, R. R. 2024 Multistability of elasto-inertial 2D channel flow . J. Fluid Mech , 981 , A30

    work page 2024

  3. [3]

    Beneitez, M., Page, J., Dubief, Y., Kerswell, R. R. 2024 Transition route to elastic and elasto-inertial turbulence in polymer channel flows . arXiv preprint arXiv:2408.11508

    arXiv 2024

  4. [4]

    2008 2D elastic turbulence

    Berti, S., Bistagnino, A., Boffetta, G., Celani, A., & Musacchio, S. 2008 2D elastic turbulence . Phys. Rev. E , 77 (5), 055306

    work page 2008

  5. [5]

    H., Li, F

    Cai, W. H., Li, F. C., Zhang, H. N., Li, X. B., Yu, B., Wei, J. J., Kawaguchi, Y., & Hishida, K. 2009 Study on the characteristics of turbulent drag-reducing channel flow by particle image velocimetry combining with proper orthogonal decomposition analysis . Physics of Fluids , 21 (11), 115103

    work page 2009

  6. [6]

    2019 Elasto-inertial wall mode instabilities in viscoelastic plane Poiseuille flow

    Chaudhary, I., Garg, P., Shankar, V., & Subramanian, G. 2019 Elasto-inertial wall mode instabilities in viscoelastic plane Poiseuille flow . J. Fluid Mech , 881 , 119-163

    work page 2019

  7. [7]

    H., Lopez, J

    Choueiri, G. H., Lopez, J. M., & Hof, B. 2018 Exceeding the Asymptotic Limit of Polymer Drag Reduction . Phys. Rev. Lett. , 120 , 124501

    work page 2018

  8. [8]

    & Hof, B

    Choueiri, G.H., Lopez, J.M., Varshney, A., Sankar, S. & Hof, B. 2021 Experimental observation of the origin and structure of elastoinertial turbulence. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 118 (45), e2102350118

    2021

Show all 54 references
  1. [9]

    Couchman, M. M. P., Beneitez, M., Page, J., & Kerswell, R. R. 2024 Inertial enhancement of the polymer diffusive instability . J. Fluid Mech , 981 , A2

    2024

  2. [10]

    Dubief, Y., White, C., Shaqfeh, E. S. G., & Terrapon, V. E. 2010 Polymer Maximum Drag Reduction: A Unique Transitional State . In Annual Research Briefs , pp. 395–404. Stanford, CA: Cent. Turbul. Res

    2010

  3. [11]

    2011 Elastic turbulence in high Reynolds number polymer drag reduced flows

    Dubief, Y., & White, C. 2011 Elastic turbulence in high Reynolds number polymer drag reduced flows . Abstract presented at APS Division of Fluid Dynamics Meeting, Baltimore, MD, Nov. 20–22, Abstr. M8–002

    2011

  4. [12]

    E., & Julio, S

    Dubief, Y., Terrapon, V. E., & Julio, S. 2013 On the mechanism of elasto-inertial turbulence . Phys. Fluids , 25 , 110817

    2013

  5. [13]

    R., Terrapon, V.E., & Steinberg, V

    Dubief, Y., Page, J., Kerswell, R. R., Terrapon, V.E., & Steinberg, V. 2022 First coherent structure in elasto-inertial turbulence . Phys. Rev. Fluids , 7 , 073301

    2022

  6. [14]

    E., & Hof, B

    Dubief, Y., Terrapon, V. E., & Hof, B. 2023 Elasto-inertial turbulence . Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. , 55 , 675-705

    2023

  7. [15]

    2003 Spectra of turbulence in dilute polymer solutions

    Fouxon, A., & Lebedev, V. 2003 Spectra of turbulence in dilute polymer solutions . Phys. Fluids , 15 , 2060-2072

    2003

  8. [16]

    & Subramanian, G

    Garg, P., Chaudhary, I., Khalid, M., Shankar, V. & Subramanian, G. 2018 Viscoelastic pipe flow is linearly unstable . Phys. Rev. Lett. , 121 , 024502

    2018

  9. [17]

    Gillissen, J. J. J. 2019 2D decaying elastoinertial turbulence . Phys. Rev. Lett. , 123 (14), 144502

    2019

  10. [18]

    Graham, M. D. 2014 Drag reduction and the dynamics of turbulence in simple and complex fluids . Phys. Fluids , 26 (10)

    2014

  11. [19]

    2000 Elastic turbulence in a polymer solution flow

    Groisman, A., & Steinberg, V. 2000 Elastic turbulence in a polymer solution flow . Nature , 405 (6782), 53–55

    2000

  12. [20]

    2004 Elastic turbulence in curvilinear flows of polymer solutions

    Groisman, A., & Steinberg, V. 2004 Elastic turbulence in curvilinear flows of polymer solutions . New J. Phys. , 6 (1), 29

    2004

  13. [21]

    L., Yao, S

    Guan, X. L., Yao, S. Y., & Jiang, N. 2013 A study on coherent structures and drag-reduction in the wall turbulence with polymer additives by TRPIV. Acta Mech Sin. , 29 , 485–493

    2013

  14. [22]

    2011 The maximum drag reduction asymptote

    Hof, B., Samanta, D., & Wagner C. 2011 The maximum drag reduction asymptote. Abstract presented at APS Division of Fluid Dynamics Meeting, Baltimore, MD, Nov. 20-22, Abstr. M8-005

    2011

  15. [23]

    & Subramanian, G

    Khalid, M., Chaudhary, I., Garg, P., Shankar, V. & Subramanian, G. 2021 The centre-mode instability of viscoelastic plane Poiseuille flow. J. Fluid Mech. 915 , A43

    2021

  16. [24]

    S., & Willmarth, W

    Lu, S. S., & Willmarth, W. W. 1973 Measurements of the structure of the Reynolds stress in a turbulent boundary layer . J. Fluid Mech , 60 (3), 481–511

    1973

  17. [25]

    Min, T., Choi, H., & Yoo, J. Y. 2003 Maximum drag reduction in a turbulent channel flow by polymer additives . J. Fluid Mech. 492 , 91-100

    2003

  18. [26]

    1926 Ueber die Viskosität kolloider Lösungen im Struktur-, Laminar- und Turbulenzgebiet

    Ostwald, W., & Auerbach, R. 1926 Ueber die Viskosität kolloider Lösungen im Struktur-, Laminar- und Turbulenzgebiet . Kolloid-Zeitschrift , 38 , 261-280

    1926

  19. [27]

    Page, J., Dubief, Y., & Kerswell, R. R. 2020 Exact travelling wave solutions in viscoelastic channel flow . Phys. Rev. Lett. , 125 , 154501

    2020

  20. [28]

    K., Boersma, B

    Ptasinski, P. K., Boersma, B. J., Nieuwstadt, F. T. M., Hulsen, M. A., Van den Brule, B. H. A. A., & Hunt, J. C. R. 2003 Turbulent Channel Flow near Maximum Drag Reduction: Simulations, Experiments and Mechanisms . J. Fluid Mech , 490 , 251-291.\

    2003

  21. [29]

    N., Wagner, C., & Hof, B

    Samanta, D., Dubief, Y., Holzner, M., Schafer, C., Morozov, A. N., Wagner, C., & Hof, B. 2013 Elasto-inertial turbulence . Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. , 110 , 10557

    2013

  22. [30]

    M., Wang, S

    Shekar, A., Mcmullen, R. M., Wang, S. N., Mckeon, B.J., & Graham, M. D. 2019 Critical-layer structures and mechanisms in elastoinertial turbulence . Phys. Rev. Lett. , 122 , 124503

    2019

  23. [31]

    2020 Self-sustained elastoinertial Tollmien–Schlichting waves

    Shekar, A., Mcmullen, R., Mckeon, B.& Graham, M. 2020 Self-sustained elastoinertial Tollmien–Schlichting waves . J. Fluid Mech , 897 , A3

    2020

  24. [32]

    Shekar, A., Mcmullen, R .M., Mckeon, B. J. & Graham, M. D. 2021 Tollmien–Schlichting route to elastoinertial turbulence in channel flow. Rev. Fluids , 6 , 093301

    2021

  25. [33]

    1998 Essentially non-oscillatory and weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws

    Shu, C. 1998 Essentially non-oscillatory and weighted essentially non-oscillatory schemes for hyperbolic conservation laws. Institute for Computer Applications in Science and Engineering

    1998

  26. [34]

    E., & Dubief, Y

    Sid, S., Terrapon V. E., & Dubief, Y. 2018 2D dynamics of elasto-inertial turbulence and its role in polymer drag reduction . Phys. Rev. Fluids , 3 , 011301

    2018

  27. [35]

    2021 Elastic turbulence: An experimental view on inertialess random flow

    Steinberg, V. 2021 Elastic turbulence: An experimental view on inertialess random flow . Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. , 53 , 27-58

    2021

  28. [36]

    E., Dubief, Y., & Soria, J

    Terrapon, V. E., Dubief, Y., & Soria, J. 2021 On the role of pressure in elasto-inertial turbulence . J. Turbul. , 16 (1), 26-43

    2021

  29. [37]

    1949 Some observations on the flow of linear polymer solutions through straight tubes at large Reynolds numbers

    Toms, B.A. 1949 Some observations on the flow of linear polymer solutions through straight tubes at large Reynolds numbers . Proc. 1st International Congress on Rheology , 2 , 135–141

    1949

  30. [38]

    S., & Smith, K

    Virk, P.S., Mickley, H. S., & Smith, K. A. 1970 The ultimate asymptote and mean flow structure in Toms’ phenomenon . Journal of Applied Mechanics , 37 (2), 488-493

    1970

  31. [39]

    Wang, S.M., Zhang, W.H., Wang, X.Y., Li, X.B., Zhang, H.N., &Li. F.C. 2023 Maximum drag reduction state of viscoelastic turbulent channel flow: marginal inertial turbulence or elasto-inertial turbulence . J. Fluid Mech , 960 , A12

    2023

  32. [40]

    N., Shekar, A., & Graham, M

    Wang, S. N., Shekar, A., & Graham, M. D. 2017 Spatiotemporal dynamics of viscoelastic turbulence in transitional channel flow . Journal of Non-Newtonian Fluid Mechanics , 244 , 104-122

    2017

  33. [41]

    D., Massah, H., & Hanratty, T

    Warholic, M. D., Massah, H., & Hanratty, T. J. 2021 Influence of drag-reducing polymers on turbulence: effects of Reynolds number, concentration and mixing . Experiments in Fluids , 27 (5), 461-472

    2021

  34. [42]

    2024 Local flow topology of a polymer-laden turbulent boundary layer

    Warwaruk, L., & Ghaemi, S. 2024 Local flow topology of a polymer-laden turbulent boundary layer . J. Fluid Mech. 983 , A22

    2024

  35. [43]

    M., & Mungal, M

    White, C. M., & Mungal, M. G. 2008 Mechanics and prediction of turbulent drag reduction with polymer additives . Annu. Rev. Fluid Mech. , 40 , 235-256

    2008

  36. [44]

    Xi, L., & Graham, M. D. 2010a Turbulent drag reduction and multistage transitions in viscoelastic minimal flow units . J. Fluid Mech , 647 , 421-452

  37. [45]

    XI, L., & Graham, M. D. 2010b Active and Hibernating Turbulence in Minimal Channel Flow of Newtonian and Polymeric Fluids . Physical Review Letters , 104 , 218301

  38. [46]

    2016 Marginal turbulent state of viscoelastic flfluids: A polymer drag reduction perspective

    XI, L., & BAI, X. 2016 Marginal turbulent state of viscoelastic flfluids: A polymer drag reduction perspective . Phys. Rev. E , 93 , 043118

    2016

  39. [47]

    A., McKinley, G

    Yamani,S., Keshavarz,B., Raj, Y., Zaki, T. A., McKinley, G. H., & Bischofberger, I. 2021 Spectral Universality of Elastoinertial Turbulence . Physical Review Letters , 127 , 074501

    2021

  40. [48]

    X., & Xu C

    Yin G., Huang W. X., & Xu C. X. 2018 Prediction of near-wall turbulence using minimal flow unit . J. Fluid Mech. , 841 , 654-673

    2018

  41. [49]

    H., ZHANG, H

    ZHANG, W. H., ZHANG, H. N., LI, Y. K., YU, B., & LI, F. C. 2021a Role of elasto-inertial turbulence in viscoelastic drag-reducing turbulence . Physics of Fluids , 33 , 081706

  42. [50]

    H., SHAO, Q

    ZHANG, W. H., SHAO, Q. Q., LI, Y. K., MA, Y., ZHANG, H. N., & LI, F.,C. 2021b On the mechanisms of sheet-like extension structures formation and self-sustaining process in elasto-inertial turbulence . Phys. Fluids , 33 , 085107

  43. [51]

    H., ZHANG, H

    ZHANG, W. H., ZHANG, H. N., WANG, Z. M., LI, Y. K., YU, B., & LI F. C. 2022 Repicturing viscoelastic drag-reducing turbulence by introducing dynamics of elasto-inertial turbulence . J. Fluid Mech , 940 , A31

    2022

  44. [52]

    N., ZHANG, W

    ZHANG, H. N., ZHANG, W. H., WANG X. Y., LI, Y. S., MA, Y., LI, X. B., & LI, F.,C. 2023 On the role of tensor interpolation in solving high-WI viscoelastic fluid flow . Phys. Fluids , 35 , 031708

    2023

  45. [53]

    N., CHENG, H

    ZHANG, H. N., CHENG, H. T., WANG, S. M., ZHANG, W. H., LI, X. B., & LI, F. C. 2024 The minimal flow unit and origin of 2D elasto-inertial turbulence . J. Fluid Mech , 999 , A82

    2024

  46. [54]

    2021 Nonasymptotic elastoinertial turbulence for asymptotic drag reduction

    ZHU, L.,& XI, L. 2021 Nonasymptotic elastoinertial turbulence for asymptotic drag reduction . Phys. Rev. Fluids , 6 , 014601

    2021

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.