Pith. sign in

Paper Citation Record · LEDGER

A Survey of Theory of Mind in Large Language Models: Evaluations, Representations, and Safety Risks

As of 8 August 2026, this Paper Citation Record lists 0 of 0 outbound references and 3 inbound Pith citation observations for arXiv:2502.06470.

A citation records a reference. It does not transfer a finding from one paper to another.

pith.paper-citation-record.v1
2502.06470 v1

Coverage vector

measured 0 of 0 reference resolution

Typed states for the displayed outbound observations.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links

measured 3 of 3 standing notices

One-hop event checks from named stored sources.

Source: scholarly_work_events, retraction_status_cache, observed 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00

measured 3 of 3 inbound itemization

Pith citing papers itemized under the disclosed page cap.

Source: paper_references, paper_reference_links, observed 2026-08-07T14:02:22.194525Z

measured 0 of 1 external citation measurements

A source-named dated measurement, never combined with another source.

Source: arxiv_reference, observed 2026-07-02T22:37:25.772308Z

Reference resolution

0 of 0 outbound references displayed

  • verified exact0
  • verified fuzzy0
  • unresolved0
  • parse uncertain0
  • malformed identifier0
  • metadata mismatch0

External citation measurements

No source-named external measurement is stored.

Outbound references

No outbound reference observations are available for this paper version.

Pith citing papers

Observation 822582f7-0c6d-429d-9f80-a40485da0b2b · inbound

Agents Require Metacognitive and Strategic Reasoning to Succeed in the Coming Labor Markets cites this paper.

Agents Require Metacognitive and Strategic Reasoning to Succeed in the Coming Labor Markets A Survey of Theory of Mind in Large Language Models: Evaluations, Representations, and Safety Risks

Reference 18

Resolution
unresolved
no resolver link, observed 2026-08-07T14:02:22.194525Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

Unavailable: canonical work link unavailable.

source=pdf_text observed=2026-08-07T14:02:22.194525Z digest=sha256:031b6af24de46f2b83f89db607cf74c947fd9f2d67045ea246937288a59fd5a9

Observation 841517d8-08d0-4bd8-9042-0a5d2ad0f541 · inbound

Does Theory of Mind Improvement Really Benefit Human-AI Interactions? Empirical Findings from Interactive Evaluations cites this paper.

Does Theory of Mind Improvement Really Benefit Human-AI Interactions? Empirical Findings from Interactive Evaluations A Survey of Theory of Mind in Large Language Models: Evaluations, Representations, and Safety Risks

Reference 36

Resolution
verified exact
arxiv_id, observed 2026-05-19T17:57:42.627226Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-05-19T17:55:04.458343Z digest=sha256:27987f83e31b3f12988a138ee93b596f4f5438ab0fff904ea8fec4f04af035d2

Observation 50bbfd55-d1c8-4153-99a4-f826df319961 · inbound

Toward Human-Centered Multi-Agent Systems: Integrating Cognition, Culture, Values, and Cooperation in AI Agents cites this paper.

Toward Human-Centered Multi-Agent Systems: Integrating Cognition, Culture, Values, and Cooperation in AI Agents A Survey of Theory of Mind in Large Language Models: Evaluations, Representations, and Safety Risks

Reference 19

Resolution
verified exact
arxiv_id, observed 2026-07-02T22:37:25.774226Z

Source-reported events for the cited work

No event found in the named queried sources as of 2026-08-08T06:32:00.761636+00:00.

source=arxiv_source observed=2026-06-27T18:47:36.189582Z digest=sha256:1e4207aea9a306bcba8e201ba4840997fb17c2eb4f37cf545f0cbc3451396f4f