Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 32 references

Origami: real structure, enumeration and quantum modularity

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read This paper defines real origami, proves their counts are governed by zonal polynomials, and derives divisor-sum formulas and quantum modular generating functions.

desk verdict Solid zonal-polynomial counting of real origami, but the genus 2 proof leans on a terse geometric exclusion that needs fuller justification. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.06548 v2 pith:A3IMJR4G submitted 2025-02-10 math.CO math.AGmath.GT

Raphaël Fesler , Peter Zograf This is my paper · ORCID
classification math.COmath.AGmath.GT MSC 05A1505E0511F0320C30
keywords realorigamizonalpolynomialssquare-tiledsurfacesquantummodularformsEisensteinseriesHurwitznumbershyperoctahedralgroupenumeration
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper introduces real origami: square-tiled surfaces (finite covers of a torus branched over one point) equipped with a fixed-point-free anti-holomorphic involution that covers complex conjugation on the torus. It proves that real origami are counted by the zonal-polynomial side of symmetric-group combinatorics, via the identity $\frac{1}{2^n n!}\sum_{\lambda\vdash n} O_R^\circ(\lambda)p_\lambda = \sum_{\rho\vdash n} Z_\rho$. For the first nontrivial strata this yields explicit divisor-sum counts: $N_n^R(1,1) = (\sigma_2(n)-\sigma_1(n))/2$ for the genus-2 stratum with two simple zeros, and a genus-3 generating function $3E_2^2 + \frac{7}{6}E_2 - E_3 - \frac{1}{6}E_4$ for two double zeros. These generating functions are quantum modular forms, and the paper conjectures that every real-origami stratum has this property, in contrast with the quasimodular forms that govern classical complex origami. A reader should care because the zonal-polynomial identity turns an abstract count of square-tiled surfaces into explicit arithmetic functions and connects the geometry to quantum modularity.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing object is the zonal-polynomial identity of Theorem 2.30, $\frac{1}{2^n n!}\sum_{\lambda\vdash n} O_R^\circ(\lambda)p_\lambda = \sum_{\rho\vdash n} Z_\rho$. Zonal polynomials are the spherical functions of the Gelfand pair $(S_{2n}, H_n)$, where $H_n$ is the hyperoctahedral group, the centralizer of the fixed-point-free involution $\tau = (1,\bar{1})\cdots(n,\bar{n})$; they play the role that Schur polynomials play for ordinary permutations. The proof routes the count through double cosets of $H_n$, connection coefficients $\kappa^\mu_{\mu,\lambda}$, and the class $B^\sim_n$ of permutations whose cycles come in $\tau$-symmetric pairs, so that a real origami's ramification profile appears as a partition with doubled parts. On the geometric side, enumeration in low genus is carried by separatrix-diagram analysis: among the four admissible diagrams in the stratum $H(1,1)$, only type IIa is compatible with a real structure, and its factorization under the involution gives a Möbius-graph count that reduces to a divisor sum.

What would settle it

Enumerate all permutation pairs $(h,v)$ in $S_4$ satisfying Definition 2.2 with commutator cycle structure $[2,2]$ (two simple zeros) and count the resulting real origami of degree 4 up to labeling; the formula predicts exactly 1. Alternatively, construct a real origami whose vertical separatrix diagram is of type IIb with positive saddle-connection lengths, which would contradict the classification used in Theorem 2.7.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that real origami—origami with a fixed-point-free anti-holomorphic involution covering complex conjugation—are governed by zonal polynomials, in the same way that ordinary complex origami are governed by Schur polynomials. Theorem 2.30 establishes the exact identity $\frac{1}{2^n n!}\sum_{\lambda\vdash n} O_R^\circ(\lambda)p_\lambda = \sum_{\rho\vdash n} Z_\rho$, where $O_R^\circ(\lambda)$ counts possibly disconnected real origami with ramification profile $\lambda$ and $Z_\rho$ is the zonal polynomial indexed by $\rho$. From this, Theorem 2.7 gives $N_n^R(1,1) = (\sigma_2(n)-\sigma_1(n))/2$ for genus-2 real origami with two simple zeros, and Section 2.3 gives $\sum_{n\geq 1} N_n^R(2,2)q^n = 3E_2^2 + \frac{7}{6}E_2 - E_3 - \frac{1}{6}E_4$ for genus-3 real origami with two double zeros. The same machinery, with Schur functions replacing zonal polynomials, recovers the classical enumeration of complex origami and equates it with a class of strictly monotone double Hurwitz numbers. The paper further shows that the two computed generating functions are quantum modular forms and conjectures this for all real-origami strata.

Load-bearing premise

The genus-2 count rests on the geometric classification that among the four admissible separatrix diagrams of $H(1,1)$ only type IIa is compatible with a real structure and type IIb cannot be realized with positive saddle-connection lengths; if an excluded diagram were realizable, the divisor-sum formula would collapse.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The formula $N_n^R(1,1) = (\sigma_2(n)-\sigma_1(n))/2$ gives explicit counts for every degree $2n$, with the asymptotics $N_n^R(1,1) = \frac{\zeta(3)}{6}n^3 + O(n^2)$ (Corollary 2.8).
  • For genus 3 with two double zeros, the generating function $3E_2^2 + \frac{7}{6}E_2 - E_3 - \frac{1}{6}E_4$ is a quantum modular form, so the real-origami counts in this stratum satisfy the corresponding modular transformation anomaly.
  • Theorem 2.30 provides an efficient algorithm: the polynomials $P_n$ enumerating real origami are computed explicitly up to $n=13$ (degree 26), as listed in Appendix A.
  • Replacing zonal polynomials by Schur polynomials counts complex origami and shows that their generating functions coincide with those of strictly monotone double Hurwitz numbers (Theorem 3.4), recovering quasimodularity in a new way.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If Conjecture 2.9 holds, every real-origami stratum would yield a quantum modular generating function, placing these counts alongside mock modular forms and quantum invariants as objects with controlled modular anomalies.
  • The Jack-function family $R(t,p;b)$ of Section 4 suggests a one-parameter interpolation between quasimodular ($b=0$, complex) and quantum modular ($b=1$, real) behavior; testing whether the coefficients $r_\lambda(b)$ count non-orientable origami for integer $b>1$ would provide a concrete check of the analogy with the $b$-conjecture for Jack characters.
  • Computing the next open stratum, such as $H(1,1,1,1)$ for genus 3 with four simple zeros, using the zonal algorithm would test the quantum-modularity conjecture numerically before a full proof is available.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper defines real origami, i.e., square-tiled covers of the torus equipped with a fixed-point-free anti-holomorphic involution covering complex conjugation, and gives a combinatorial model for them in terms of a pair of permutations h, v in S_{2n} with a fixed-point-free involution τ. The central algebraic result, Theorem 2.30, expresses a generating function for (possibly disconnected) real origami, counted with automorphisms weights, as a sum of zonal polynomials. Using this and a geometric separatrix-diagram argument, the paper derives an explicit divisor-sum formula (Theorem 2.7) for the number of genus 2 real origami with two simple zeros, asserts a corresponding formula for genus 3 real origami with two double zeros (§2.3), and observes that the resulting generating functions are quantum modular. It also gives a Schur-polynomial analogue for complex origami, connects complex origami counts to strictly monotone double Hurwitz numbers, and discusses conjectures about Jack-function interpolation and integrable hierarchies.

Significance. If the main results hold, this is a valuable contribution: it gives the first explicit enumeration of real origami in low-dimensional strata, with counts expressed in terms of divisor sums; it establishes a clean zonal-polynomial generating identity (Theorem 2.30) that has no fitted parameters and appears machine-verifiable; and it provides substantial evidence for the paper's quantum-modularity conjecture. The complex-origami section also delivers a fast algorithm and a new connection to monotone Hurwitz numbers, with reproducible numerical data in the appendices. The main weaknesses are that the geometric input for Theorem 2.7 is asserted rather than proved, and the genus 3 formulas and Theorem 2.12 are only sketched; these are load-bearing because the advertised quantum-modularity examples depend on them.

major comments (3)
  1. [§2.2 (proof of Theorem 2.7)] The entire enumeration of genus 2 real origami rests on the assertion that 'out of these four diagrams only type IIa is compatible with a real structure,' but the justification is two sentences. In particular, the statement that type IIb 'is not compatible with assignment of positive lengths to saddle connections' is puzzling, since type IIb was just listed among the four admissible diagrams realizable by a complex origami; presumably the intended meaning is that type IIb cannot satisfy the additional length constraints forced by a real structure, but no argument or reference is given. The cited sources [10,32] classify complex separatrix diagrams, not real-structure compatibility. Since Theorem 2.7 and the quantum-modularity example F2(q)=(E3-E2)/2 collapse if any excluded diagram is realizable, this step needs a complete proof or a precise citation.
  2. [§2.3 (genus 3 enumeration)] The formula for the genus 3 counts, a central advertised result, is presented as a bullet list of three contribution formulas with no derivation. The text explicitly says 'Here we sketch a proof' and refers to a calculation in [6] for the stratum H(2), which is not the same as the H(2,2) stratum being treated. The total generating function 3E2^2 + (7/6)E2 - E3 - (1/6)E4 is then used to support quantum modularity. A sketch of this kind is not sufficient for a stated theorem; please provide a full derivation or explicitly mark the genus 3 counts as conjectural.
  3. [§2.4 (Theorem 2.12)] Theorem 2.12, which asserts F2(q) = (E3(q)-E2(q))/2 and its quantum modularity, is not proved: the text says the proof is 'based on Lemma 2.34 and is similar to the proof of Theorem 3.4' and that 'alternatively, applying the propagator of [14] ... we get the same result.' Neither alternative is carried out. Since this theorem is used to exhibit a quantum modular generating function in the simply ramified setting, the proof must be supplied or the claim should be restated as a consequence of a theorem in [14] with a precise reference.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§2.2 (proof of Theorem 2.7)] The passage from gluings to the unweighted count |O_geom^R(2n) ∩ H(1,1)| divides by 2 for the rotational symmetry of the Möbius graph, but it does not discuss whether other real automorphisms of the square-tiled surface can occur and how they affect the count; please clarify whether the count is weighted by reciprocal automorphism order or unweighted.
  2. [Definition 2.2] The condition 'τ h τ h^{-1} = τ v τ v = id' is asymmetric (h is τ-invariant while v is τ-anti-invariant, in the sense of B^∼_n). This asymmetry is used later in §2.5, but a brief explanatory sentence would help the reader see that the two conditions are intentional.
  3. [Figures and tables] Figure references 'Figure 2.2' and 'Figure 2.3' are ambiguous because the figures are numbered 2 and 4; likewise 'Table 2.37' should read 'Table 1'.
  4. [Abstract and §2.3] The abstract says 'genus 3 real origami with 2 double zeros' while §2.3 says 'with 2 double poles'; the stratum H(2,2) consists of two double zeros, so the terminology should be made consistent.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 2.0 of 10

No circular derivation; the enumeration identities are proved from zonal-polynomial algebra and geometric cylinder counts, with only a minor self-citation for auxiliary permutation facts.

full rationale

The central identity (Eq. 2.6, Theorem 2.30) is not definitionally equivalent to its own input. The quantity O^circ_R(lambda) is defined by the counting formula (2.5) as a sum of kappa^mu_{mu,lambda}, and the theorem proves equality with the zonal-polynomial sum using Lemma 2.28 from [15], Definition 2.29, and orthogonality of zonal spherical functions. No coefficient is fitted and no equation is assumed equal to the conclusion. The genus-2 count (Theorem 2.7) is a direct geometric count: the paper states "Out of these four diagrams only type IIa is compatible with a real structure" and then counts gluings to obtain N = (1/2) sum_{ell|n} ell(ell-1). Even if the diagram-exclusion assertion were wrong, that would be a correctness gap in a geometric classification, not a circular reduction. The genus-3 formula is quoted from the external source [6] ("This calculation essentially coincides with that of [6], pp. 13-15"); importing an external computation is not circular. The only author-overlapping citation is [2] (Burman-Fesler), introduced by "We start by recalling the necessary results from [2]." It supplies the structure of B^sim_n used in the algebraic setup, but it is a published prior result with stated assumptions, not an assumption of the target theorem; identity (2.6) itself is proved in the present paper. Thus there is no load-bearing self-citation chain and no prediction that reduces by construction to a fit. Score is set to 2 only to acknowledge the minor self-citation; the derivation is otherwise self-contained.

Assumptions & free parameters 0 free parameters · 4 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central derivation uses no fitted numeric parameters and postulates no new particles or forces. The main external inputs are the theory of zonal polynomials, the classification of separatrix diagrams from the cited literature, and the monotone transposition lemma. The paper's own contribution is the zonal-polynomial generating identity and its applications.

assumptions (4)
  • standard math Riemann-Hurwitz formula g = 1 + n - k/2 for origami
    Used throughout Section 2 to relate degree, number of zeros, and genus of an origami.
  • domain assumption Zorich's classification of admissible separatrix diagrams for H(1,1)
    Section 2.2 relies on there being exactly four admissible diagrams and on the assertion that only type IIa is compatible with a real structure; the paper gives only a brief justification and cites [10,31].
  • standard math Standard facts about zonal polynomials and the double coset algebra of the Gelfand pair (S_{2n}, H_n)
    Section 2.5 invokes Macdonald [23] and Hanlon-Stanley-Stembridge [15] for connection coefficients, zonal spherical functions, and the order of double cosets.
  • standard math Unique decomposition of a permutation into strictly monotone transpositions (Lemma 3.5 from [4])
    Theorem 3.4 depends on this lemma to rewrite commutator counts as double strictly monotone Hurwitz numbers.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Origami: real structure, enumeration and quantum modularity." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/A3IMJR4G

@misc{pith2026250206548,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Origami: real structure, enumeration and quantum modularity},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/A3IMJR4G}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.06548}
}
read the original abstract

We define real origami (that is, origami equipped with a real structure) and enumerate them using the combinatorics of zonal polynomials. We explicitly express in terms of sums of divisors the numbers of genus 2 real origami with 2 simple zeros and the numbers of genus 3 real origami with 2 double zeros showing that their generating functions are quantum modular forms. Furthermore, we show that by replacing zonal polynomials with Schur polynomials we can effectively count the classical (complex) origami. As a byproduct, we establish a connection between classical origami and a specific class of double Hurwitz numbers. Finally, we discuss some conjectures and open questions involving Jack functions, quantum modular forms, and integrable hierarchies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.06548 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Loops on the torus. Consider the monodromy representation ρ : π1(T \ {0}, b) → S2n, and put h = ρ(α), v = ρ(β). Notice that the preimage f −1 (b) ∈ X consists of 2n distinct points a1, . . . , a2n that are pairwise interchanged by ϕ, thus giving an involution τ in S2n without fixed points. It is an easy check that the triple (h, v, τ ) satisfies all the conditions of Definition 2.2. Now let us show that Definition 2… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. From left to right: separatrix diagrams with one cylin￾der (type I), with two cylinders (type IIa and type IIb), and with three cylinders (type III). Out of these four diagrams only type IIa is compatible with a real structure. Indeed, types I and III are not realizable because they have an odd number of vertical cylinders, cf. Definition 2.1, and type IIb is not compatible with assignment of positive lengths to sad… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. 2-cylinder separatrix diagram invariant with respect to the anti-holomorphic involution (left) and its 1-cylinder non￾orientable factor (right). of the loops, then ℓ = ℓ1 + ℓ2 is the length of each boundary component. We compute the number of ways to glue the cylinder of circumference ℓ to the Möbius graph. First, we notice that ℓ can be split into the sum ℓ1 + ℓ2 of positive integers in ℓ − 1 ways. Second, one boun… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (2 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: From left to right: 4-cylinder disconnected separatrix diagram, 2-cylinder disconnected and 2-cylinder connected dia￾grams [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Two perfect matchings: ι1 = (1, ¯1)(2, ¯2)(3, ¯3) (dashed lines) and ι2 = (1, ¯1)(2, ¯3)(3, ¯2) (solid lines). Here Λ(ι1, ι2) = [2, 1]. As permutations, ι1ι2 = (1)(¯1)(2, 3)(¯2, ¯3), with cycle decomposi￾tion [22 , 1 2 ]. Denote by Λ(ιi , ιj ) = [λ1 . . . λs] the corre…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

32 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

  1. [6]

    Aritmética, Grupos y Análisis (AGRA) IV

    V. Delecroix, Q. Gendron and C. Matheus. Combinatorics of square-tiled surfaces and geome- try of moduli spaces, Lecture notes of a minicourse at the IMPA–ICTP online summer school “Aritmética, Grupos y Análisis (AGRA) IV”

    work page

  2. [14]

    M.Anas Hahn, H. Markwig. Tropical twisted Hurwitz numbers for elliptic curves, arXiv: 2403.00333

    arXiv

  3. [1]

    Bloch, S., Okounkov, A.: The character of the infinite wedge representation. Adv. Math. 149, (2000) 1–60

    work page 2000

  4. [2]

    5 (2024) p

    Y.Burman, R.Fesler, Ribbon decomposition and twisted Hurwitz numbersMathematics Re- search Reports, Vol. 5 (2024) p. 1-19

    work page 2024

  5. [3]

    Chapuy and M

    G. Chapuy and M. Dołęga, Non-orientable branched coverings, b-Hurwitz numbers, and pos- itivity for multiparametric Jack expansions, Adv. Math. 409 (2022), 108645

    work page 2022

  6. [4]

    Borot, S

    G. Borot, S. Charbonnier, N. Do, E. Garcia-Failde Relating ordinary and fully simple maps via monotone Hurwitz numbers. Elect. J. Comb. 26 3 (2019), 3-43

    work page 2019

  7. [5]

    Cavalieri, E

    R. Cavalieri, E. Miles. Riemann Surfaces and Algebraic Curves: A First Course in Hurwitz Theory. London Mathematical Society Student Texts Book 87 (2016)

    work page 2016

  8. [7]

    In: Dijkgraaf, R., Faber, C., van der Geer, G

    Dijkgraaf, R.: Mirror symmetry and elliptic curves. In: Dijkgraaf, R., Faber, C., van der Geer, G. (eds.) The Moduli Spaces of Curves. Progress in Mathematics, vol. 129. Birkhäuser, Boston (1995)

    work page 1995

Show all 32 references
  1. [8]

    Dudina, Enumeration of Origami Curves, Graduation thesis, HSE University, under super- vision of S

    M. Dudina, Enumeration of Origami Curves, Graduation thesis, HSE University, under super- vision of S. Lando (2016)

    2016

  2. [9]

    Eskin, A

    A. Eskin, A. Okounkov, Asymptotics of numbers of branched coverings of a torus and volumes of moduli spaces of holomorphic differentials. Invent. Math. 145, 59–103 (2001)

    2001

  3. [10]

    Goujard, M

    E. Goujard, M. Möller, Counting Feynman-like graphs: Quasimodularity and Siegel–Veech weight. J. Eur. Math. Soc. 22 (2020), no. 2, pp. 365–412

    2020

  4. [11]

    Goulden and D.M

    I.P. Goulden and D.M. Jackson. Maps in locally orientable surfaces, the double coset algebra, and zonal polynomials. Canadian J. Math, 48(3):569–584, 1996

    1996

  5. [12]

    I. P. Goulden and D. M. Jackson. Connection coefficients, matchings, maps and combinatorial conjectures for Jack symmetric functions. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc., 348(3):873–892, 1996

    1996

  6. [13]

    Anas Hahn, J.W

    M. Anas Hahn, J.W. van Ittersum and F. Leid. Triply mixed coverings of arbitrary base curves: Quasimodularity, quantum curves and a mysterious topological recursions. in Ann. Inst. Henri Poincaré D 9.2 (2022), p. 239-296

    2022

  7. [15]

    P. J. Hanlon, R. P. Stanley, and J. R. Stembridge, Some combinatorial aspects of the spectra of normally distributed random matrices, Contemporary Math. 138(1992), 151—174

    1992

  8. [16]

    Kac and J

    V. Kac and J. van de Leur, The geometry of spinors and the multicomponent BKP and DKP hierarchies, CRM Proceedings and Lecture Notes, vol. 14, 1998

    1998

  9. [17]

    Hardy, E

    G. Hardy, E. Wright. An Introduction to the Theory of Numbers, 5th ed. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press, 1979

    1979

  10. [18]

    In: Dijkgraaf, R., Faber, C., van der Geer, G

    Kaneko, M., Zagier, D.: A generalized Jacobi theta function and quasimodular forms. In: Dijkgraaf, R., Faber, C., van der Geer, G. (eds.) The Moduli Spaces of Curves. Progress in Mathematics, pp. 165–172. Birkhäuser, Boston (1995)

    1995

  11. [19]

    Kerov and G

    S. Kerov and G. Olshanski. Polynomial functions on the set of Young diagrams. C. R. Acad. Sci., Paris, Sér. I, 319(2):121–126, 1994

    1994

  12. [20]

    Kremer, Invariants of complex and p-adic origami curves, KIT-Bibliothek, Karlsruhe, 2009

    J. Kremer, Invariants of complex and p-adic origami curves, KIT-Bibliothek, Karlsruhe, 2009

    2009

  13. [21]

    Lassalle

    M. Lassalle. A positivity conjecture for Jack polynomials. Math. Res. Lett., 15(4):661– 681, 2008

    2008

  14. [22]

    Lando and A

    S. Lando and A. Zvonkin. Graphs on Surfaces and Their Applications. Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences, vol. 141, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2004

    2004

  15. [23]

    I.G.Macdonald.SymmetricfunctionsandHallpolynomials, Secondedition.ClarendonPress, Oxford, 348(3), 1995

    1995

  16. [24]

    Jucys–Murphy elements, orthogonal matrix integrals, and Jack measures

    Matsumoto, S. Jucys–Murphy elements, orthogonal matrix integrals, and Jack measures. Ramanujan J. 26, 69–107 (2011)

    2011

  17. [25]

    Natanzon, A

    S. Natanzon, A. Orlov, BKP and projective Hurwitz numbers. Letters in Mathematical Physics, 2017, vol. 107, no 6, p. 1065-1109

    2017

  18. [26]

    Toda equations for Hurwitz numbers,Math

    A.Okounkov. Toda equations for Hurwitz numbers,Math. Res. Letters 7 (2000), pp. 447–453

    2000

  19. [27]

    Stanley Enumerative combinatorics

    R. Stanley Enumerative combinatorics. Vol. 2, Cambridge Studies in Advanced Mathematics,

  20. [28]

    Zagier, Elliptic modular forms and their applications, in: The 1-2-3 of modular forms, Universitext, Springer, Berlin, 2008, p

    D. Zagier, Elliptic modular forms and their applications, in: The 1-2-3 of modular forms, Universitext, Springer, Berlin, 2008, p. 1–103

    2008

  21. [29]

    Zagier, Quantum modular forms

    D. Zagier, Quantum modular forms. Quanta of Maths, 11, 5, (2010) p. 659-675

    2010

  22. [30]

    Jucys–Murphy Elements and Weingarten Matrices

    Zinn-Justin, P. Jucys–Murphy Elements and Weingarten Matrices. Lett Math Phys 91, 119–127 (2010)

    2010

  23. [31]

    A. Zorich . Square Tiled Surfaces and Teichmüller Volumes of the Moduli Spaces of Abelian Differentials. In: Burger, M., Iozzi, A. (eds) Rigidity in Dynamics and Geometry. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg (2002)

    2002

  24. [32]

    Zorich, Geometry and dynamics in moduli spaces, Lecture notes of a course at Université Paris Diderot (2023) Appendix A The first 13 polynomialsPn for real origami count

    A. Zorich, Geometry and dynamics in moduli spaces, Lecture notes of a course at Université Paris Diderot (2023) Appendix A The first 13 polynomialsPn for real origami count. P1 = p1 P2 = 3p2 1 2 + p2 P3 = 4 3 p3 1 + 3p1p2 + 8p3 P4 = 7 4 p4 1 + 7p2 1p2 + 26p1p3 + 35 2 p2 2 + 36...

    2023

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.