Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 4 minor 1 cited by

The JWST View of Cygnus A: Jet-Driven Coronal Outflow with a Twist

T0 review · 3 major / 4 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Cygnus A's narrow-line region is a hollow bicone whose gas spirals outward at 250 km/s, combining 200 km/s rotation with 150 km/s outflow; jet ablation of dense clouds drives the fastest gas.

desk verdict Rich first JWST IFU data on Cygnus A's NLR; the rotation-about-the-jet-axis interpretation is plausible as kinematics but the physical torque claim is not yet supported. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.06603 v1 pith:OEJHO5HB submitted 2025-02-10 astro-ph.GA

Patrick M. Ogle , B. Sebastian , A. Aravindan , M. McDonald , G. Canalizo , M. L. N. Ashby , M. Azadi , R. Antonucci
show 24 more authors
P. Barthel S. Baum M. Birkinshaw C. Carilli M. Chiaberge C. Duggal K. Gebhardt S. Hyman J. Kuraszkiewicz E. Lopez-Rodriguez A. M. Medling G. Miley O. Omoruyi C. O'Dea D. Perley R. A. Perley E. Perlman V. Reynaldi M. Singha W. Sparks G. Tremblay B. Wilkes S. P. Willner D. M. Worrall
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.GA
keywords CygnusAradiojetfeedbacknarrow-lineregionkinematicsAGNphotoionizationgalacticoutflowsintegralfieldspectroscopygalaxies
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper uses JWST near- and mid-infrared integral-field spectra, plus optical integral-field data, to argue that the kiloparsec-scale narrow-line region around Cygnus A is not a rotating disk lit by the nucleus, as previously assumed, but a hollow biconical outflow that both streams outward and rotates around the radio jet axis. The velocity field is captured by a model of spiral flow on a cone: gas moves outward at about 150 km/s while circling the axis at about 200 km/s, for a net 250 km/s flow. The same data show dense clouds near the jet being ablated into fast bullets moving 600 to 2000 km/s, with a mass outflow rate of about 40 solar masses per year from one clump. If correct, this establishes that radio jets can torque and eject interstellar gas at kiloparsec scales, a concrete mechanism for jet feedback long after the jet breaks out of the galaxy.

What carries the argument

The central object is the logarithmic conical spiral outflow model: a thin, hollow bicone of half-opening angle 46 degrees, inclined with the radio jet, along which gas moves at constant velocity with components $(v_R, v_\phi) = (150, 200)$ km/s. The spiral geometry combines rotation and outflow in one continuous velocity field, and comparison with the [Si VII] 2.483 micron moment maps fixes the parameters. The second mechanism is jet ablation: dense clouds in the Fe II Clump are overrun by the radio jet, which strips, compresses, and accelerates them into bullets with 600 to 2000 km/s velocities; the paper invokes this to explain features radiation pressure cannot.

What would settle it

Measure the magnetic field strength and geometry in the kiloparsec-scale bicone with far-infrared or radio polarimetry and Faraday rotation mapping; if the magnetic pressure plus any measurable thermal pressure gradient is far below the roughly $1.8 \times 10^{-7}$ cm/s$^2$ centripetal acceleration needed to hold gas on the spiral, the rotation claim lacks physical support. A simpler kinematic test would be to fit the full [Si VII] and [O III] datacubes with a pure radial bicone outflow plus clumpy projection effects; if that reproduces the four-limb asymmetry without rotation, the spiral model is not unique.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The central claim is that Cygnus A's narrow-line region is a density-stratified, hollow bicone aligned with the radio jet, whose gas follows biconical spiral outflow lines: constant 150 km/s radial outflow plus 200 km/s rotation about the jet axis. The rotation axis coincides with the radio jet rather than with a galaxy disk, and this is presented as evidence that the jet transfers angular momentum to the interstellar medium, spinning the NLR around itself. In addition, the jet ablates dense photoionized clouds, especially the Fe II Clump, producing localized bullets and streamers at 600 to 2000 km/s; radiation pressure alone cannot explain these speeds at distances beyond 1 kpc, so jet-ISM interaction is required. The paper also shows that the rich infrared spectrum, including kiloparsec-scale coronal lines and the enhanced [Fe II] emission, is reproduced by AGN photoionization over a range of gas densities, with no need for shock heating.

Load-bearing premise

The rotation persists only if some force not detected in this paper, such as magnetic fields or a gas-pressure gradient, continually pulls the gas toward the cone axis; gravity alone supplies only about a quarter of the required pull.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The NLR of Cygnus A is rotating around the radio axis rather than orbiting in the galaxy disk, so prior disk-rotation interpretations of this velocity field are geometrically and dynamically inconsistent.
  • Radio jets can keep doing mechanical work on their host interstellar medium at kiloparsec scales long after breaking out of the galaxy, transferring angular momentum and driving roughly 40 solar masses per year of outflow from individual clumps.
  • Radiation pressure cannot account for the fastest bullet, which reaches about 2000 km/s at 1.3 kpc, unless it was launched within 120 pc and survived ballistically; jet ablation is the viable alternative.
  • The full infrared spectrum, including kiloparsec-scale coronal lines and bright [Fe II], is consistent with AGN photoionization of gas spanning five density components, so shocks are not required to explain the emission.
  • The power needed to drive the spiral outflow is only about $10^{-4}$ of the jet or AGN power, so this feedback channel is energetically cheap.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the rotation claim holds up, other powerful radio galaxies with kiloparsec-scale narrow-line regions should show the same four-limb velocity asymmetry in high-resolution integral-field data; a systematic search would test whether jet-induced NLR spin is a generic phenomenon rather than unique to Cygnus A.
  • The missing centripetal force required to sustain the rotation could be probed directly: magnetic pressure from a kiloparsec-scale field, hinted at by mid-infrared polarization, or a measurable pressure gradient would close the dynamical loop, while the absence of either would leave the spiral model as a description rather than a physical explanation.
  • The angular-momentum bookkeeping suggests the NLR spin is probably not inherited from the supermassive black hole alone, which holds only about 0.5 percent of the required angular momentum; sustained accretion or an external reservoir such as the CO disk must supply it, tying the rotation to the galaxy's accretion history.
  • A testable extension is to model the Fe II Clump ablation in three-dimensional hydrodynamics with the measured cloud masses and jet power; predicting bullet velocities and tails matching the observed -2000 km/s tail would strengthen the jet-ablation channel over radiation pressure.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 4 minor

Summary. The paper presents JWST NIRSpec IFU, MIRI MRS, and Keck KCWI integral-field spectroscopy of the central few kiloparsecs of Cygnus A. It reports 169 detected infrared emission lines, maps the extinction and ionization structure of the narrow-line region (NLR), and models the NLR spectrum with multi-component Cloudy photoionization models. The central new kinematic claim is that the NLR is rotating around the radio jet axis in addition to outflowing, with the overall velocity field described by a biconical spiral outflow with v_R = 150 km/s and v_phi = 200 km/s. The paper also reports fast (600--2000 km/s) bullets and streamers associated with a dense [Fe II] clump, and derives local outflow rates of 40 Msun/yr for the clump and 13 Msun/yr for Bullet B1. The interpretation is that the jet is transferring angular momentum to the NLR and driving the observed rotation and outflows.

Significance. If the rotation claim holds, this would be a notable result: Cygnus A would be the first kpc-scale NLR shown to rotate around the radio jet axis, with implications for jet-driven angular-momentum feedback. The observational dataset is rich and the photoionization modeling is detailed, with many line ratios reproduced to within a factor of two; the detection of the bullets and their association with the Fe II clump is an interesting and reasonably supported finding. The rotation signal is visible in the moment maps independently of the model, so the kinematic evidence is not circularly derived from the spiral model. However, the physical interpretation that the NLR is rotating because of jet-driven angular momentum transfer is not yet dynamically supported: the paper itself shows that the required centripetal acceleration is roughly four times the gravitational acceleration and invokes an undetected additional force. The manuscript is valuable as a data paper, but the headline physical claim needs to be either strengthened or explicitly reframed as a kinematic description.

major comments (3)
  1. [§7.4] The dynamical foundation of the rotation claim is missing. The required centripetal acceleration for v_phi = 200 km/s at R = 1 kpc on a cone of half-angle 46 degrees is computed as 1.8e-7 cm/s^2, about four times the gravitational acceleration of 4.9e-8 cm/s^2 from the enclosed mass. The paper states that 'There must be an additional force directed towards the axis of the cone, such as gas pressure gradient or electromagnetism, in order to sustain the centripetal acceleration of a spiral outflow,' but no such force is detected or quantified. Because the abstract and Section 8 conclude that the NLR is rotating around the radio axis and that the rotation is driven by angular momentum transfer from the jet, this physical claim outruns the evidence. Please either detect/quantify a supporting force (e.g., using the existing magnetic-field polarization maps or pressure gradients from the Cloudy models) or restrict the claim to a kinematic description and adjust the abstract and conclusions accordingly.
  2. [§7.3, Eq. (1)] The spiral model is explicitly introduced as 'not intended to be a physical model of the outflow,' and the velocity components (v_R = 150, v_phi = 200 km/s) are chosen to match the observed moment maps ('best matched by'). The paper then uses this model in the abstract and conclusions as evidence for physical rotation. Moreover, the model leaves large residuals: velocity-dispersion patches of 150--350 km/s near the axis, the W Split with +/-250 km/s streamers, and the 600--2000 km/s bullets. Please provide a quantitative goodness-of-fit (e.g., residual velocity and dispersion maps, or a chi-square statistic) and clearly separate the kinematic description from the physical interpretation in the abstract, Section 7.3, and Section 8.
  3. [Table 1] Table 1 lists line flux ratios for the NWR, Fe II Clump, and Bullet B1 without uncertainties. Because the photoionization models are claimed to reproduce most ratios to within a factor of two (Section 7.1, Fig. 11), the absence of measurement errors makes this agreement unquantifiable. Please include uncertainties or detection limits, at least for the lines used in the model comparison, so that the reader can assess the significance of any model-data discrepancies.
minor comments (4)
  1. [§8] In the paragraph beginning 'The high mass outflow rate', 'aditional' should be 'additional'.
  2. [Figure 9 and §6] The text in §6 quotes bullet B1 at -1380 km/s, while the Figure 9 caption and channel map label state -1390 km/s; please reconcile the velocities.
  3. [Table 1] Several rows near the end of Table 1 (e.g., Hu delta onward) have no measured flux ratios; a footnote or symbol indicating that these lines come from the MIRI spectrum and are deferred would improve clarity.
  4. [§6] The systemic redshift is set by CO stellar absorption (z = 0.0557), which is -60 km/s from the Tadhunter et al. (2003) value; a brief comment on how this zero-point choice affects the inferred rotation pattern would be useful, since the velocity field is central to the paper's kinematic claims.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the rotation claim is read directly from the data, and the spiral model is explicitly descriptive rather than a source of predicted quantities.

full rationale

The paper's central new kinematic claim—that the NLR rotates about the radio axis—is supported directly by the observed velocity and velocity-dispersion maps (Section 6, Fig. 7), independently of the spiral outflow model. The model in Section 7.3 is explicitly not a physical model ('this mathematical model is intended to describe the observed velocity field, but is not intended to be a physical model of the outflow'), and its components (v_R = 150 km/s, v_phi = 200 km/s) are fit parameters chosen to match the data, not predictions derived from first principles. The radiative-acceleration analysis in Section 7.2 uses independent inputs (enclosed mass from CO kinematics, bolometric luminosity from infrared observations) and does not presuppose the rotation. The Cloudy photoionization modeling is a standard forward calculation with stated density and SED assumptions. Self-citations such as Ogle et al. (1997) and Canalizo et al. (2003) provide observational context and do not carry the load of the rotation or outflow conclusions. The paper's own Section 7.4 candidly identifies the missing centripetal force and angular-momentum budget as unresolved dynamical questions, which is a scientific limitation rather than a circular step. No fitted parameter is renamed as an independent prediction, and no load-bearing claim reduces by construction to its input.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper's central kinematic claim rests on a deliberately descriptive spiral model with fitted velocity components, plus a requirement for an unidentified centripetal force. The photoionization and extinction results rest on standard assumptions that are stated and mostly tested, though several model lines are overpredicted.

free parameters (6)
  • Spiral outflow radial velocity vR = 150 km/s
    Chosen so that the model best matches the observed [Si VII] moment maps (Section 7.3); not derived from a physical model.
  • Spiral outflow azimuthal velocity vphi = 200 km/s
    Chosen to match the observed velocity field in the spiral outflow model (Section 7.3); drives the rotation claim.
  • Intrinsic velocity dispersion sigma_v = 80 km/s
    Extra model parameter added to match observed line widths at the bicone edge (Section 7.3).
  • Cone half-opening angle Theta = 46 degrees
    Taken from the projected half-opening angle of the [Si VII] map and used as model input (Section 7.3).
  • Cloudy component densities log nH = 0.0, 1.0, 1.5, 2.0, 3.0
    Five density components are required to model each region; relative normalizations are optimized to minimize chi-squared (Section 7.1, Table 2).
  • Inclination of radio axis = 45 < i < 74.5 degrees, exact adopted value not stated
    Used to deproject the bicone in the spiral outflow model; taken from VLBI but the model does not report the single adopted inclination (Section 7.3).
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption The NLR emission arises from a thin, hollow bicone whose surface is aligned with the radio jet.
    The spiral outflow model is built on this geometry; deviations are acknowledged but not modeled (Section 7.3).
  • ad hoc to paper A logarithmic conical spiral with constant velocity components describes the gas flow.
    Equation (1) defines the flow geometry; the paper states it is a mathematical description rather than a physical model (Section 7.3).
  • domain assumption The AGN photoionizing SED is a Mathews and Ferland spectrum with solar abundances and no dust depletion.
    Used for all Cloudy models; the paper notes Al, Ca, Ti coronal lines are overpredicted, possibly indicating residual dust depletion (Section 7.1).
  • domain assumption Intrinsic Pa alpha / Br gamma equals 12.4 from Case B recombination at 10,000 K.
    The extinction map and derived AV values depend on this assumed ratio (Section 5).
  • ad hoc to paper An additional force directed toward the cone axis exists, such as gas pressure gradient or electromagnetism.
    Gravitational acceleration is about one quarter of the required centripetal acceleration; without this force the kpc-scale rotation cannot persist (Section 7.4).
  • domain assumption VLBI-derived inclination interval 45 < i < 74.5 degrees with the WNW side approaching applies at kpc scales.
    Used to set the projection of the spiral model (Section 7.3).
invented entities (1)
  • Unidentified centripetal force in the NLR
    purpose: To keep the proposed kpc-scale rotation about the radio axis dynamically viable; the paper suggests gas pressure gradient or electromagnetic force but detects neither.
    The paper computes that gravity supplies only about a quarter of the required centripetal acceleration at R = 1 kpc and states 'There must be an additional force directed towards the axis of the cone' (Section 7.4).

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of The JWST View of Cygnus A: Jet-Driven Coronal Outflow with a Twist." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OEJHO5HB

@misc{pith2026250206603,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: The JWST View of Cygnus A: Jet-Driven Coronal Outflow with a Twist},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OEJHO5HB}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.06603}
}
read the original abstract

We present first results from James Webb Space Telescope (JWST) Near-Infrared Spectrograph (NIRSpec), Mid-Infrared Instrument (MIRI), and Keck Cosmic Webb Imager (KCWI) integral field spectroscopy of the powerful but highly obscured host-galaxy of the jetted radio source Cygnus A. We detect 169 infrared emission lines at 1.7--27 micron and explore the kinematics and physical properties of the extended narrow-line region (NLR) in unprecedented detail. The density-stratified NLR appears to be shaped by the initial blow-out and ongoing interaction of the radio jet with the interstellar medium, creating a multi-phase bicone with a layered structure composed of molecular and ionized gas. The NLR spectrum, with strong coronal emission at kpc-scale, is well-modeled by AGN photoionization. We find evidence that the NLR is rotating around the radio axis, perhaps mediated by magnetic fields and driven by angular momentum transfer from the radio jet. The overall velocity field of the NLR is well described by 250 km/s outflow along biconical spiral flow lines, combining both rotation and outflow signatures. There is particularly bright [Fe II] 1.644 micron emission from a dense, high-velocity dispersion, photoionized clump of clouds found near the projected radio axis. Outflows of 600--2000 km/s are found in bullets and streamers of ionized gas that may be ablated by the radio jet from these clouds, driving a local outflow rate of 40 Msun/yr.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.06603 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Cygnus A NLR in context. Top left: The radio jet, with its hot spots and enormous radio lobes, drives a shock into the intracluster medium, mapped at 11 GHz by the VLA (Sebokolodi et al. 2020) and imaged in 0.5–0.7 keV X-rays by Chandra (Snios et al. 2018). Smaller panels: the JWST NIRSpec IFU and HST observations zoom in a 3. ′′6 × 3. ′′4 region centered on the galaxy nucleus. Top right: Comparison of Pa α, [Si vi]… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. NIRSpec IFU and MIRI MRS spectra of the nucleus, extracted within an 0. ′′7×0. ′′7 square aperture. The continuum at > 2 µm is hot dust emission from the inner AGN torus, with silicate absorption from cooler dust in the outer torus or the shielded faces of dense clumps. Emission lines from warm H2 are indicated by green tick marks and ions by other colored marks as indicated in the legend. the SE cone appears to be … view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. NIRSpec IFU spectra of the nucleus (NR, black) and the NW reference region (NWR, blue). Emission lines of interest are marked. Spectra are scaled to show them together. The plethora of rovibrational H2 lines are important diagnostics of shocks or turbulence in warm molecular gas. The Paschen, Pfund, and Brackett series of hydrogen have characteristic ratios that are useful tracers of extinction. The [Fe ii] 1.644 µm… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (12 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: A segment of the MIRI MRS spectra of the Fe ii Clump (blue) and nucleus (orange), displaying numerous coronal and intermediate ionization emission lines. The silicate absorption trough is considerably weaker in the scattered nuclear continuum spectrum from the Fe ii Cl…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: NIRSpec IFU continuum-subtracted line flux (moment 0 maps) of Pa α, H2 1-0 S(1) 2.122 µm, [Si vi] 1.963 µm, and [Fe ii] 1.644 µm. The VLA radio maps at 33 GHz (blue) and 11 GHz (contours) feature the radio jet, nucleus, and the Cyg A2 secondary nucleus (Perley et al. 2…
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Extinction at Pa α relative to Br γ. Top row: Emission line (moment 0) intensity maps. Bottom left: Pa α vs. Br γ for each spaxel compared to the Case B ratio of 12.4 (dotted line). Bottom center: Relative extinction assuming Case B. Bottom right: Extinction map. Some …
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: Gas velocity component map for emission lines in the 1.7–2.3 µm region of the NIRSpec G235H spectrum. The velocity map for each component (V1, V2, V3) is compared to the corresponding Pa α moment maps. Blue and red narrow velocity components V1 and V2 follow an overall…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: Emission line flux maps for narrow (V1 + V2) and broad (V3) velocity components, ordered by increasing ionization potential. Scale bar is 1. ′′0 = 1.09 kpc [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p012_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: High velocity outflows. Top: [Si vi] channel maps at Bullet B1 peak velocity (v = −1390 km s−1 ), blue peak of W Split (-250 km s−1 ), and red peak of W Split (+270 km s−1 ). Extraction regions for Bullet B1 (blue), NW reference spectrum (green), and W Split (red) are …
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Comparison of KCWI and NIRSpec IFU data. Top left: [O iii] 5007 ˚A line maps in two velocity ranges (blue: −1700 < vr < −1200 km s−1 , green: −700 < vr < 500 km s−1 ), with much harder stretch on the blue, high velocity outflow component. Top right: KCWI optical spect…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Observed line flux relative to Pa α compared to predictions of multi-component Cloudy AGN photoionization models ( [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p015_11.png]
Figure 12
Figure 12. Figure 12: Outflow velocity of an NLR cloud observed at 1.5 kpc that was launched by radiation pressure at a smaller radius and slowed by gravity. The outflow velocity attained by a cloud launched at radius Rlaunch was computed assuming a constant density galaxy stellar core wit…
Figure 13
Figure 13. Figure 13: [Si vii] 2.483 µm moment maps and spectral extractions compared to spiral outflow model. The moment 1 and moment 2 maps trace velocity and velocity dispersion in km s−1 . A model with constant velocity (250 km s−1 ) outflow tangent to logarithmic conical spiral flow l…
Figure 14
Figure 14. Figure 14: pPXF 3-component fits to NIRSpec spectra of NW reference (NWR) region. Notable residuals include foreground Galactic Paα, the unmodeled 3.3 µm PAH feature, and a number of weak, unidentified lines not included in the model. Some narrow residual spikes are from bad dat…
Figure 15
Figure 15. Figure 15: pPXF 3-component fits to NIRSpec spectra of NW reference (NWR) region, continued. Notable residuals include poorly fit or unidentified lines at 3.95 µm, 4.03 µm, and 4.71 µm [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p023_15.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Magnetic field in the Lobes of the Seyfert Galaxy NGC3516: Suggestions of a Helical field

    astro-ph.GA 2025-06 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Rotation measure gradients across the radio lobes of NGC3516 suggest a kpc-scale helical magnetic field in a Seyfert galaxy, the first such detection claimed in a Seyfert's lobes.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

117 extracted references · 23 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ur...

  3. [3]

    = A@ T &y g37gws & I8҃C踧 0 LV g- h5Z #X@ 'X

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt -12pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command E...

    2021

  4. [4]

    1994, , 371, 313, 10.1038/371313a0

    Antonucci , R., Hurt , T., & Kinney , A. 1994, , 371, 313, 10.1038/371313a0

    doi:10.1038/371313a0 1994

  5. [5]

    L., & Hurt , T

    Antonucci , R., Kinney , A. L., & Hurt , T. 1993, , 414, 506, 10.1086/173098

    work page doi:10.1086/173098 1993

  6. [6]

    R., et al

    Argyriou , I., Glasse , A., Law , D. R., et al. 2023, , 675, A111, 10.1051/0004-6361/202346489

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/202346489 2023

  7. [7]

    F., Gandhi , P., Smette , A., & Duschl , W

    Asmus , D., H \"o nig , S. F., Gandhi , P., Smette , A., & Duschl , W. J. 2014, , 439, 1648, 10.1093/mnras/stu041

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stu041 2014

  8. [8]

    P., Tollerud , E

    Astropy Collaboration , Robitaille , T. P., Tollerud , E. J., et al. 2013, , 558, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201322068

    doi:10.1051/0004-6361/201322068 2013

Show all 117 references
  1. [9]

    M., Sip o cz , B

    Astropy Collaboration , Price-Whelan , A. M., Sip o cz , B. M., et al. 2018, , 156, 123, 10.3847/1538-3881/aabc4f

    2018 doi

  2. [10]

    1954, , 119, 206, 10.1086/145812

    Baade , W., & Minkowski , R. 1954, , 119, 206, 10.1086/145812

    1954 doi

  3. [11]

    2024, , 527, 2371, 10.1093/mnras/stad3328

    Bagul , A., Ogle , P., Antonucci , R., Maloney , P., & Lopez Rodriguez , E. 2024, , 527, 2371, 10.1093/mnras/stad3328

    2024 doi

  4. [12]

    F., Carilli , C

    Bartel , N., Sorathia , B., Bietenholz , M. F., Carilli , C. L., & Diamond , P. 1995, Proceedings of the National Academy of Science, 92, 11371, 10.1073/pnas.92.25.11371

    1995 doi

  5. [13]

    2012, , 757, L26, 10.1088/2041-8205/757/2/L26

    Barthel , P., Haas , M., Leipski , C., & Wilkes , B. 2012, , 757, L26, 10.1088/2041-8205/757/2/L26

    2012 doi

  6. [14]

    D., & Arnaud , K

    Barthel , P. D., & Arnaud , K. A. 1996, , 283, L45, 10.1093/mnras/283.2.L45

    1996 doi

  7. [15]

    2019, , 485, 416, 10.1093/mnras/stz430

    Bianchi , S., Guainazzi , M., Laor , A., Stern , J., & Behar , E. 2019, , 485, 416, 10.1093/mnras/stz430

    2019 doi

  8. [16]

    A., Storchi-Bergmann , T., et al

    Bianchin , M., Riffel , R. A., Storchi-Bergmann , T., et al. 2022, , 510, 639, 10.1093/mnras/stab3468

    2022 doi

  9. [17]

    2024, , 965, 103, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2a50

    Bianchin , M., U , V., Song , Y., et al. 2024, , 965, 103, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad2a50

    2024 doi

  10. [18]

    H., & van Dishoeck , E

    Black , J. H., & van Dishoeck , E. F. 1987, , 322, 412, 10.1086/165740

    1987 doi

  11. [19]

    D., & Payne , D

    Blandford , R. D., & Payne , D. G. 1982, , 199, 883, 10.1093/mnras/199.4.883

    1982 doi

  12. [20]

    1994, , 421, 92, 10.1086/173628

    Blietz , M., Cameron , M., Drapatz , S., et al. 1994, , 421, 92, 10.1086/173628

    1994 doi

  13. [21]

    P., Bach , U., Bremer , M., & Zensus , J

    Boccardi , B., Krichbaum , T. P., Bach , U., Bremer , M., & Zensus , J. A. 2016 a , , 588, L9, 10.1051/0004-6361/201628412

    2016 doi

  14. [22]

    P., Bach , U., et al

    Boccardi , B., Krichbaum , T. P., Bach , U., et al. 2016 b , , 585, A33, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526985

    2016 doi

  15. [23]

    L., Birkmann , S

    B \"o ker , T., Beck , T. L., Birkmann , S. M., et al. 2023, , 135, 038001, 10.1088/1538-3873/acb846

    2023 doi

  16. [24]

    Canalizo , G., Max , C., Whysong , D., Antonucci , R., & Dahm , S. E. 2003, , 597, 823, 10.1086/378513

    2003 doi

  17. [25]

    2017, , 466, 798, 10.1093/mnras/stw3020

    Cappellari , M. 2017, , 466, 798, 10.1093/mnras/stw3020

    2017 doi

  18. [26]

    2023, , 526, 3273, 10.1093/mnras/stad2597

    ---. 2023, , 526, 3273, 10.1093/mnras/stad2597

    2023 doi

  19. [27]

    2011, , 413, 813, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18174.x

    Cappellari , M., Emsellem , E., Krajnovi \'c , D., et al. 2011, , 413, 813, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.18174.x

    2011

  20. [28]

    L., Bartel , N., & Linfield , R

    Carilli , C. L., Bartel , N., & Linfield , R. P. 1991, , 102, 1691, 10.1086/115988

    1991 doi

  21. [29]

    L., & Barthel , P

    Carilli , C. L., & Barthel , P. D. 1996, , 7, 1, 10.1007/s001590050001

    1996 doi

  22. [30]

    L., Perley , R

    Carilli , C. L., Perley , R. A., Dhawan , V., & Perley , D. A. 2019, , 874, L32, 10.3847/2041-8213/ab1019

    2019 doi

  23. [31]

    L., Perley , R

    Carilli , C. L., Perley , R. A., Perley , D. A., et al. 2022, , 937, 106, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac8f45

    2022 doi

  24. [32]

    M., Binney , J., et al

    Cattaneo , A., Faber , S. M., Binney , J., et al. 2009, , 460, 213, 10.1038/nature08135

    2009 doi

  25. [33]

    H., Riffel , R

    Costa-Souza , J. H., Riffel , R. A., Souza-Oliveira , G. L., et al. 2024, , 974, 127, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad702a

    2024 doi

  26. [34]

    A., Schaye , J., Bower , R

    Crain , R. A., Schaye , J., Bower , R. G., et al. 2015, , 450, 1937, 10.1093/mnras/stv725

    2015 doi

  27. [35]

    J., Springel , V., White , S

    Croton , D. J., Springel , V., White , S. D. M., et al. 2006, , 365, 11, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.09675.x

    2006

  28. [36]

    M., Paraschos , G

    Dasyra , K. M., Paraschos , G. F., Combes , F., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2406.03218, 10.48550/arXiv.2406.03218

    2024 doi arXiv

  29. [37]

    Del Zanna , G., & DeLuca , E. E. 2018, , 852, 52, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa9edf

    2018 doi

  30. [38]

    Djorgovski , S., Weir , N., Matthews , K., & Graham , J. R. 1991, , 372, L67, 10.1086/186025

    1991 doi

  31. [39]

    A., Groves , B

    Dopita , M. A., Groves , B. A., Sutherland , R. S., Binette , L., & Cecil , G. 2002, , 572, 753, 10.1086/340429

    2002 doi

  32. [40]

    2017, , 844, 37, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7566

    Dugan , Z., Gaibler , V., & Silk , J. 2017, , 844, 37, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7566

    2017 doi

  33. [41]

    Fabian , A. C. 2012, , 50, 455, 10.1146/annurev-astro-081811-125521

    2012 doi

  34. [42]

    J., Porter , R

    Ferland , G. J., Porter , R. L., van Hoof , P. A. M., et al. 2013, , 49, 137. 1302.4485

    2013 arXiv

  35. [43]

    B., Weymann , R

    Foltz , C. B., Weymann , R. J., Peterson , B. M., et al. 1986, , 307, 504, 10.1086/164440

    1986 doi

  36. [44]

    o rster Schreiber , N. M., \

    F \"o rster Schreiber , N. M., \"U bler , H., Davies , R. L., et al. 2019, , 875, 21, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab0ca2

    2019 doi

  37. [45]

    2012, , 425, 438, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21479.x

    Gaibler , V., Khochfar , S., Krause , M., & Silk , J. 2012, , 425, 438, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.21479.x

    2012

  38. [46]

    P., Mather , J

    Gardner , J. P., Mather , J. C., Abbott , R., et al. 2023, , 135, 068001, 10.1088/1538-3873/acd1b5

    2023 doi

  39. [47]

    M., Mainieri , V., et al

    Girdhar , A., Harrison , C. M., Mainieri , V., et al. 2022, , 512, 1608, 10.1093/mnras/stac073

    2022 doi

  40. [48]

    D., Aalto , S., K \"o nig , S., et al

    Gorski , M. D., Aalto , S., K \"o nig , S., et al. 2024, , 684, L11, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348821

    2024 doi

  41. [49]

    M., Emonts , B

    Guillard , P., Ogle , P. M., Emonts , B. H. C., et al. 2012, , 747, 95, 10.1088/0004-637X/747/2/95

    2012 doi

  42. [50]

    W., Netzer , H., & Shields , J

    Hamann , F. W., Netzer , H., & Shields , J. C. 2000, , 536, 101, 10.1086/308936

    2000 doi

  43. [51]

    M., & Best, P

    Heckman, T. M., & Best, P. N. 2014, Annual Review of Astronomy and Astrophysics, 52, 589, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-astro-081913-035722

    2014 doi

  44. [52]

    M., & Best , P

    Heckman , T. M., & Best , P. N. 2023, Galaxies, 11, 21, 10.3390/galaxies11010021

    2023 doi

  45. [53]

    N., & Morganti , R

    Holt , J., Tadhunter , C. N., & Morganti , R. 2008, , 387, 639, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2008.13089.x

    2008

  46. [54]

    H \"o nig , S. F. 2019, , 884, 171, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab4591

    2019 doi

  47. [55]

    G., & Storey , P

    Hummer , D. G., & Storey , P. J. 1987, , 224, 801, 10.1093/mnras/224.3.801

    1987 doi

  48. [56]

    Jackson , N., Tadhunter , C., & Sparks , W. B. 1998, , 301, 131, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.1998.02008.x

    1998

  49. [57]

    2022, , 661, A80, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142663

    Jakobsen , P., Ferruit , P., Alves de Oliveira , C., et al. 2022, , 661, A80, 10.1051/0004-6361/202142663

    2022 doi

  50. [58]

    2024, Jdaviz, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.5513927

    JDADF Developers , Averbukh, J., Bradley, L., et al. 2024, Jdaviz, Zenodo, 10.5281/zenodo.5513927

    2024 doi

  51. [59]

    N., Raouf , M., et al

    Kondapally , R., Best , P. N., Raouf , M., et al. 2023, , 523, 5292, 10.1093/mnras/stad1813

    2023 doi

  52. [60]

    Konigl , A., & Kartje , J. F. 1994, , 434, 446, 10.1086/174746

    1994 doi

  53. [61]

    H., McKee , C

    Krolik , J. H., McKee , C. F., & Tarter , C. B. 1981, , 249, 422, 10.1086/159303

    1981 doi

  54. [62]

    M., Alatalo , K., & Appleton , P

    Lanz , L., Ogle , P. M., Alatalo , K., & Appleton , P. N. 2016, , 826, 29, 10.3847/0004-637X/826/1/29

    2016 doi

  55. [63]

    H., Nesvadba , N

    Leftley , J. H., Nesvadba , N. P. H., Bicknell , G. V., et al. 2024, , 689, A314, 10.1051/0004-6361/202449848

    2024 doi

  56. [64]

    P., et al

    Leipski , C., Haas , M., Willner , S. P., et al. 2010, , 717, 766, 10.1088/0004-637X/717/2/766

    2010 doi

  57. [65]

    2018 a , , 861, L23, 10.3847/2041-8213/aacff5

    Lopez-Rodriguez , E., Antonucci , R., Chary , R.-R., & Kishimoto , M. 2018 a , , 861, L23, 10.3847/2041-8213/aacff5

    2018 doi

  58. [66]

    2023, , 951, 31, 10.3847/1538-4357/accb96

    Lopez-Rodriguez , E., Kishimoto , M., Antonucci , R., et al. 2023, , 951, 31, 10.3847/1538-4357/accb96

    2023 doi

  59. [67]

    2018 b , , 478, 2350, 10.1093/mnras/sty1197

    Lopez-Rodriguez , E., Alonso-Herrero , A., Diaz-Santos , T., et al. 2018 b , , 478, 2350, 10.1093/mnras/sty1197

    2018 doi

  60. [68]

    2024, , 531, 2079, 10.1093/mnras/stae1295

    Mandal , A., Mukherjee , D., Federrath , C., et al. 2024, , 531, 2079, 10.1093/mnras/stae1295

    2024 doi

  61. [69]

    2021, , 508, 4738, 10.1093/mnras/stab2822

    ---. 2021, , 508, 4738, 10.1093/mnras/stab2822

    2021 doi

  62. [70]

    G., & Ferland , G

    Mathews , W. G., & Ferland , G. J. 1987, , 323, 456, 10.1086/165843

    1987 doi

  63. [71]

    R., & Nulsen , P

    McNamara , B. R., & Nulsen , P. E. J. 2012, New Journal of Physics, 14, 055023, 10.1088/1367-2630/14/5/055023

    2012 doi

  64. [72]

    M., Schmitt , H

    Meena , B., Crenshaw , D. M., Schmitt , H. R., et al. 2023, , 943, 98, 10.3847/1538-4357/aca75f

    2023 doi

  65. [73]

    Y., et al

    Meenakshi , M., Mukherjee , D., Wagner , A. Y., et al. 2022, , 516, 766, 10.1093/mnras/stac2251

    2022 doi

  66. [74]

    N., & Oosterloo , T

    Morganti , R., Tadhunter , C. N., & Oosterloo , T. A. 2005, , 444, L9, 10.1051/0004-6361:200500197

    2005 doi

  67. [75]

    C., et al

    Morrissey , P., Matuszewski , M., Martin , D. C., et al. 2018, , 864, 93, 10.3847/1538-4357/aad597

    2018 doi

  68. [76]

    2000, , 528, 186, 10.1086/308142

    Mouri , H., Kawara , K., & Taniguchi , Y. 2000, , 528, 186, 10.1086/308142

    2000 doi

  69. [77]

    V., Wagner , A

    Mukherjee , D., Bicknell , G. V., Wagner , A. Y., Sutherland , R. S., & Silk , J. 2018, , 479, 5544, 10.1093/mnras/sty1776

    2018 doi

  70. [78]

    2023, kderp: Keck Cosmic Web Imager Data Extraction and Reduction Pipeline in IDL , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2301.018

    Neill , D., Matuszewski , M., & Martin , C. 2023, kderp: Keck Cosmic Web Imager Data Extraction and Reduction Pipeline in IDL , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:2301.018

    2023

  71. [79]

    M., Ivezi \'c , Z ., & Elitzur , M

    Nenkova , M., Sirocky , M. M., Ivezi \'c , Z ., & Elitzur , M. 2008, , 685, 147, 10.1086/590482

    2008 doi

  72. [80]

    Nesvadba , N. P. H., Wagner , A. Y., Mukherjee , D., et al. 2021, , 654, A8, 10.1051/0004-6361/202140544

    2021 doi

  73. [81]

    M., Cohen , M

    Ogle , P. M., Cohen , M. H., Miller , J. S., et al. 1997, , 482, L37, 10.1086/310675

    1997 doi

  74. [82]

    E., & Miller , J

    Osterbrock , D. E., & Miller , J. S. 1975, , 197, 535, 10.1086/153541

    1975 doi

  75. [83]

    2022, , 665, L11, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244725

    Pereira-Santaella , M., \'A lvarez-M \'a rquez , J., Garc \' a-Bernete , I., et al. 2022, , 665, L11, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244725

    2022 doi

  76. [84]

    A., Perley , R

    Perley , D. A., Perley , R. A., Dhawan , V., & Carilli , C. L. 2017, , 841, 117, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa725b

    2017 doi

  77. [85]

    A., Chandler , C

    Perley , R. A., Chandler , C. J., Butler , B. J., & Wrobel , J. M. 2011, , 739, L1, 10.1088/2041-8205/739/1/L1

    2011 doi

  78. [86]

    A., Dreher , J

    Perley , R. A., Dreher , J. W., & Cowan , J. J. 1984, , 285, L35, 10.1086/184360

    1984 doi

  79. [87]

    C., Baum , S

    Privon , G. C., Baum , S. A., O'Dea , C. P., et al. 2012, , 747, 46, 10.1088/0004-637X/747/1/46

    2012 doi

  80. [88]

    M., Rafelski , M., et al

    Revalski , M., Crenshaw , D. M., Rafelski , M., et al. 2022, , 930, 14, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac5f3d

    2022 doi

  81. [89]

    S., Lohfink , A

    Reynolds , C. S., Lohfink , A. M., Ogle , P. M., et al. 2015, , 808, 154, 10.1088/0004-637X/808/2/154

    2015 doi

  82. [90]

    Riffel , R. A. 2021, , 506, 2950, 10.1093/mnras/stab1877

    2021 doi

  83. [91]

    G., Viegas , S., Sigut , T

    Rodr \' guez-Ardila , A., Pastoriza , M. G., Viegas , S., Sigut , T. A. A., & Pradhan , A. K. 2004, , 425, 457, 10.1051/0004-6361:20034285

    2004 doi

  84. [92]

    E., Clarke , D

    Rosen , A., Hardee , P. E., Clarke , D. A., & Johnson , A. 1999, , 510, 136, 10.1086/306565

    1999 doi

  85. [93]

    2020, , 642, A69, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038725

    Rossi , P., Bodo , G., Massaglia , S., & Capetti , A. 2020, , 642, A69, 10.1051/0004-6361/202038725

    2020 doi

  86. [94]

    2019, , 630, A58, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936249

    Roueff , E., Abgrall , H., Czachorowski , P., et al. 2019, , 630, A58, 10.1051/0004-6361/201936249

    2019 doi

  87. [95]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2401.11612, 10.48550/arXiv.2401.11612

    Roy , N., Heckman , T., Overzier , R., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2401.11612, 10.48550/arXiv.2401.11612

    2024 doi arXiv

  88. [96]

    Rupke , D. S. N. 2014, IFSRED: Data Reduction for Integral Field Spectrographs , Astrophysics Source Code Library, record ascl:1409.004

    2014

  89. [97]

    F., & Finkbeiner , D

    Schlafly , E. F., & Finkbeiner , D. P. 2011, , 737, 103, 10.1088/0004-637X/737/2/103

    2011 doi

  90. [98]

    F., Meisner , A

    Schlafly , E. F., Meisner , A. M., Stutz , A. M., et al. 2016, , 821, 78, 10.3847/0004-637X/821/2/78

    2016 doi

  91. [99]

    Sebokolodi , M. L. L., Perley , R., Eilek , J., et al. 2020, , 903, 36, 10.3847/1538-4357/abb80e

    2020 doi

  92. [100]

    Snios , B., Nulsen , P. E. J., Wise , M. W., et al. 2018, , 855, 71, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaaf1a

    2018 doi

  93. [101]

    S., & Dav \'e , R

    Somerville , R. S., & Dav \'e , R. 2015, , 53, 51, 10.1146/annurev-astro-082812-140951

    2015 doi

  94. [102]

    L., Raga , A

    Steffen , W., G \'o mez , J. L., Raga , A. C., & Williams , R. J. R. 1997, , 491, L73, 10.1086/311066

    1997 doi

  95. [103]

    E., & Lilly , S

    Stockton , A., Ridgway , S. E., & Lilly , S. J. 1994, , 108, 414, 10.1086/117080

    1994 doi

  96. [104]

    2007, , 51, 153, 10.1016/j.newar.2006.11.020

    Tadhunter , C. 2007, , 51, 153, 10.1016/j.newar.2006.11.020

    2007 doi

  97. [105]

    2003, , 342, 861, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06588.x

    Tadhunter , C., Marconi , A., Axon , D., et al. 2003, , 342, 861, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2003.06588.x

    2003

  98. [106]

    Tadhunter , C. N. 1991, , 251, 46P, 10.1093/mnras/251.1.46P

    1991 doi

  99. [107]

    N., Metz , S., & Robinson , A

    Tadhunter , C. N., Metz , S., & Robinson , A. 1994, , 268, 989, 10.1093/mnras/268.4.989

    1994 doi

  100. [108]

    N., Packham , C., Axon , D

    Tadhunter , C. N., Packham , C., Axon , D. J., et al. 1999, , 512, L91, 10.1086/311882

    1999 doi

  101. [110]

    Ueno , S., Koyama , K., Nishida , M., Yamauchi , S., & Ward , M. J. 1994, , 431, L1, 10.1086/187458

    1994 doi

  102. [111]

    L., Ishikawa , Y., et al

    Vayner , A., Zakamska , N. L., Ishikawa , Y., et al. 2024, , 960, 126, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0be9

    2024 doi

  103. [112]

    2016, , 463, 3409, 10.1093/mnras/stw2231

    Vazdekis , A., Koleva , M., Ricciardelli , E., R \"o ck , B., & Falc \'o n-Barroso , J. 2016, , 463, 3409, 10.1093/mnras/stw2231

    2016 doi

  104. [113]

    2024, , 683, A169, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348531

    Wang , W., Wylezalek , D., De Breuck , C., et al. 2024, , 683, A169, 10.1051/0004-6361/202348531

    2024 doi

  105. [114]

    H., & Pavlovski , G

    Wang , Y., Knigge , C., Croston , J. H., & Pavlovski , G. 2011, , 418, 1138, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2011.19563.x

    2011

  106. [115]

    W., Glasse , A., et al

    Wells , M., Pel , J. W., Glasse , A., et al. 2015, , 127, 646, 10.1086/682281

    2015 doi

  107. [116]

    J., Edge , A

    Wilman , R. J., Edge , A. C., Johnstone , R. M., Crawford , C. S., & Fabian , A. C. 2000, , 318, 1232, 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2000.03868.x

    2000

  108. [117]

    J., Wilson , A

    Young , A. J., Wilson , A. S., Terashima , Y., Arnaud , K. A., & Smith , D. A. 2002, , 564, 176, 10.1086/324200

    2002 doi

  109. [118]

    Zhang , L., Packham , C., Hicks , E. K. S., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2409.09771, 10.48550/arXiv.2409.09771

    2024 doi arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.