Pith. sign in

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 1 cited by

Multi-band study of the flaring mode emission in the transitional millisecond pulsar PSR J1023+0038

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read Millisecond pulsar's X-ray flares have radio and optical counterparts

desk verdict Genuinely new multi-band dataset of J1023 flaring mode, with solid empirical results; the onset simultaneity is partly obscured by a data gap, and one UV-optical claim needs support. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.06953 v1 pith:BIL6T47D submitted 2025-02-10 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.SR

M. C. Baglio , F. Coti Zelati , A. K. Hughes , F. Carotenuto , S. Campana , D. de Martino , S. E. Motta , A. Papitto
show 12 more authors
N. Rea D. M. Russell D. F. Torres A. Di Marco F. La Monaca S. Covino S. Giarratana G. Illiano A. Miraval Zanon K. Alabarta P. D'Avanzo M. M. Messa
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SR
keywords transitionalmillisecondpulsarPSRJ1023+0038flaringmodemulti-wavelengthobservationscompactjetsynchrotronself-absorptionopticalpolarimetryradiopolarization
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper establishes that the flaring mode of the transitional millisecond pulsar PSR J1023+0038 is a multi-wavelength phenomenon rather than a purely X-ray event. On 2024 June 4-5, X-ray flares coincided with ultraviolet and optical brightening and with the strongest radio flare observed from this source since its 2013 state transition, reaching 1.2 mJy at 6 GHz and lasting about an hour. During the flare, the optical polarization degree dropped from about 1.4% to about 0.5%, and the radio spectrum evolved from flat or inverted to optically thin on minute timescales. The paper proposes that a thickening of the inner accretion disc enlarges the shock between the pulsar wind and the accretion flow, driving the X-ray flares, and that the enhanced irradiation ionizes the disc, supplying free electrons that are channelled into a compact jet whose increased mass-loading produces the radio and optical variability. If correct, this links flaring-mode jet activity to a specific physical trigger and makes transitional millisecond pulsars a low-accretion-rate laboratory for jet-launching studies.

What carries the argument

The central mechanism is the disc-thickening–jet-mass-loading chain: a transient increase in the thickness of the inner accretion disc enlarges the shock between the pulsar wind and the accretion flow, boosting X-ray dissipation; the stronger irradiation ionizes more of the disc, producing free electrons that travel along magnetic field lines into a compact jet, increasing its mass-loading and thus its radio and optical luminosity. This is supported by the optical polarization drop (an unpolarized component emerging during the flare), the radio spectral index evolution (optically thick rise to optically thin decay, with a marginal frequency lag between 5 and 7 GHz), and the radio polarization upper limits, which favor a compact jet origin over ordered discrete ejecta.

What would settle it

A dedicated simultaneous multi-band campaign that catches the very onset of an X-ray flare with continuous coverage and finds no accompanying radio or optical flare would falsify the claim that flaring-mode X-ray flares have multi-band counterparts; conversely, VLBI imaging that resolves the radio emission into discrete moving ejecta would confirm the discrete-ejection interpretation rather than the compact-jet one.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper reports that the X-ray flaring of PSR J1023+0038 on 2024 June 4-5 had simultaneous ultraviolet, optical, and radio counterparts, including the brightest radio flare seen from this source in over a decade: roughly 1.2 mJy at 6 GHz, lasting about one hour and exhibiting substructure. During the radio flare the optical polarization fraction dropped from approximately 1.4% to 0.5%, then recovered, signaling the emergence of an unpolarized component, while the radio spectral index swung from optically thick (rising) to optically thin (decaying). The proposed physical picture is that a transient thickening of the inner accretion disc enlarges the shock region where the pulsar wind meets the accretion flow, producing the X-ray flares; the shock irradiates the disc, raising its ionization level and injecting free electrons into the magnetic field lines that feed a compact jet. The extra mass-loading enhances the jet's radio and optical emission, and the radio spectral evolution is consistent with synchrotron self-absorption in either discrete ejecta or internal shocks within the compact jet. The paper also notes that a second observation three months later found the source flaring again at a similar level, suggesting a possible new phase of frequent radio flaring.

Load-bearing premise

The paper assumes that the radio, ultraviolet, and optical brightening observed while the X-ray source entered flaring mode are all caused by the same physical episode, even though the X-ray flare onset occurred during a data gap and the radio flare may have begun rising before the first X-ray measurement of the flare.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • The flaring mode of transitional millisecond pulsars is a jet-linked state, not purely an accretion-disk phenomenon, so X-ray, UV, optical, and radio monitoring should be done jointly in future campaigns.
  • The disc-thickening trigger provides a testable physical connection between X-ray flaring and jet mass-loading that can be compared with other transitional millisecond pulsars.
  • The jet power estimated for the flaring episodes, roughly $10^{33}$ erg s$^{-1}$, is comparable to the accretion power in the high mode, implying that jets can be efficiently powered at very low accretion rates.
  • The radio spectral evolution and frequency lag resemble compact jet flaring in X-ray binaries, making transitional millisecond pulsars a new class of objects for studying jet physics in a different accretion regime.
  • If the source is entering a phase of frequent radio flaring, continued radio monitoring could reveal a distinct activity state and allow VLBI follow-up to distinguish ejecta from compact jet emission.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The proposed mechanism implies that the radio flare amplitude should track the X-ray flare intensity with a short delay; a future campaign with dense simultaneous sampling could test this correlation directly.
  • The near-zero radio polarization during the flare, if confirmed with deeper limits, argues that any discrete ejecta must have tangled magnetic fields, which would constrain the ejection geometry and composition.
  • The comparison to V404 Cygni, at five orders of magnitude lower accretion luminosity, suggests that jet-launching efficiency may be higher than expected at low accretion rates; testing this across other transitional millisecond pulsars could reveal whether the flaring-mode jet is a general phenomenon.
  • A dedicated spectral energy distribution during a future flare, using rapid cadence to avoid mode-mixing, could separate the jet, disc, and shock components and directly test the disc-thickening scenario.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This Letter presents a multi-wavelength study of the flaring mode of the transitional millisecond pulsar PSR J1023+0038, combining IXPE, Swift, VLT/FORS2, and VLA data from June 2024. The authors report that an X-ray flaring episode is accompanied by UV and optical brightening and coincides with the brightest radio flare seen from this source in over a decade (reaching ~1.2 mJy at 6 GHz). Optical polarimetry shows a drop in the polarisation degree from ~1.4% to ~0.5% during the flare, with a strong anti-correlation between polarisation degree and R-band brightness (Spearman ρ = -0.78, p = 3e-8). The radio spectral index evolves from optically thick to optically thin on minute timescales, and the authors infer radio polarisation upper limits of <8.7%, <2.3%, and <8.2% before, during, and after the flare. The paper interprets the multi-band flare as evidence for increased jet mass-loading triggered by a thickening of the inner disc, and explores both discrete-ejecta and internal-shock models for the radio emission.

Significance. The paper provides a uniquely comprehensive dataset of the flaring mode of a tMSP, and the optical depolarisation is quantified with a robust correlation test. If the association between the X-ray flaring and the bright radio flare is confirmed, this would be an important step toward understanding jet launching at very low accretion rates. The radio spectral analysis and polarisation upper limits are carefully executed, the reduced FORS2 data are publicly available, and the authors are appropriately cautious about distinguishing compact-jet from discrete-ejecta interpretations. However, the strength of the central claim is limited by the fact that the X-ray data contain a gap at the time of the radio rise, so the onset simultaneity is not directly observed.

major comments (2)
  1. [Abstract and Section 3.1] The claim that the X-ray and radio flares are 'strictly simultaneous' is not fully supported by the data. The X-ray observations have a gap from BMJD 60466.025 to 60466.052, and the radio flux begins rising at BMJD 60466.03, inside this gap. Thus the onset of the X-ray flare is not observed; only the post-gap X-ray flaring is seen to overlap with the radio flare. Since a radio flare is also observed during an X-ray low mode at BMJD 60465.997, the possibility that the bright radio flare is coincidental rather than causally linked cannot be excluded. The authors should soften the simultaneity language in the abstract and Section 4, or provide an additional argument (for example, from the UV/optical light curves) that the X-ray flaring must have started before the gap.
  2. [Section 4 and Appendix D] The derived jet power of (5–8)×10^32 erg/s and the jet radiative luminosity of about 1.5×10^34 erg/s are conditional on the discrete-ejecta interpretation: the identification of 'at least five individual flares' and the assumption that each corresponds to a single ejection are not uniquely established by the data, since the alternative internal-shock model in a compact jet is also consistent with the spectral evolution. The break frequency of 2.5×10^13 Hz is adopted from Baglio et al. (2023) and the paper itself notes that it is unmeasured in the flaring mode. The authors should present these energetics as illustrative, clearly state their dependence on the adopted model, and indicate how the conclusion about jet-production efficiency would change under the compact-jet interpretation.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Abstract and Section 4] The abstract reports the radio flare as 'reaching 1.2 mJy at 6 GHz and lasting ~1 hour', while Section 4 states 'brightest (≳1.5 mJy at 6 GHz) and longest (~50 minutes)'; these values should be reconciled.
  2. [Section 3.1] The statement that 'the first optical data point after the gap is ~0.6 magnitudes brighter than before' should specify which gap is meant, since both the X-ray light curve and the VLT optical coverage have gaps in this epoch.
  3. [Section 3.1 and Fig. D.2] The radio frequency delay of 0.7 min is only marginally significant (1.8σ); the text acknowledges this, but the claim that it is 'consistent with our interpretation of a propagating synchrotron emitting plasma' should be phrased more cautiously, for example as a tentative hint that requires confirmation.
  4. [Appendix B] Equation (B.3) defines the quantity S(Φ) but this definition is not referenced in the main text where S(Φ) is first mentioned in Section 2.3; adding a forward reference would improve readability.
  5. [Table A.1] The two rows for the VLA June 2024 observation list the same start and end times but different exposures (11.1 ks and 13.2 ks); this apparent duplication should be clarified.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the multi-band flare claims are direct measurements; the jet interpretation is post-hoc and explicitly caveated.

full rationale

The paper's central empirical claims—the 1.2 mJy radio flare, the X-ray/UV/optical enhancements, the optical polarization drop from ~1.4% to ~0.5%, and the radio spectral index rise/decay asymmetry—are presented as direct measurements, not as outputs derived from fitted parameters or from the interpretive model. The jet mass-loading scenario in Section 4 is offered after the observations as a plausible physical mechanism, not as a predicted consequence of a fitted parameter. The self-citations are used as stated external inputs rather than as load-bearing derivations: Baglio et al. (2023) supplies the break frequency for a jet luminosity estimate, and the paper explicitly cautions 'this estimation is subject to significant uncertainty, as there are currently no measurements of the break frequency during the flaring mode'; Baglio et al. (2024) is cited for the shock-origin interpretation of the polarized component, which is secondary to the main flare detection. The optical polarisation–magnitude fit (beta = -1.0 ± 0.2) is a descriptive regression of the observed anti-correlation, not a fitted parameter renamed as a prediction. The main caveat is evidential rather than circular: the X-ray flare began during a gap (BMJD 60466.025–60466.052) while the radio rise begins around BMJD 60466.03, so the simultaneity of the multi-band flare is inferred from partial temporal overlap rather than fully resolved. This affects the robustness of the 'counterpart' interpretation but does not make any derivation equivalent to its inputs by construction. No circular step is identifiable in the paper's own equations or citation chain.

Assumptions & free parameters 3 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The empirical findings rely on standard telescope calibration and reduction, not listed as axioms. The interpretive claims rest on several domain assumptions: the disc-thickening trigger for X-ray flares, the pulsar-wind shock origin of polarized emission, the synchrotron self-absorption interpretation of radio spectral evolution, and equipartition for energy estimates. These are stated in the text and are reasonable but not independently verified here.

free parameters (3)
  • Jet break frequency nu_break = 2.5e13 Hz
    Adopted from Baglio et al. (2023), not measured during flaring mode; used to compute jet radiative luminosity in Appendix D, so the luminosity estimate is model-dependent.
  • Optically thin spectral index above the break = -0.6
    Assumed above the break frequency in Appendix D; the authors state results are weakly dependent on this choice.
  • Ejecta rise timescale per sub-flare = ~300 s
    Assumed from the flare rise time to convert minimum energy to jet power; if the true ejection timescale differs, the jet power scales linearly.
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption X-ray flaring in tMSPs is caused by transient increases in inner accretion disc thickness due to thermal instabilities or magnetic field rearrangements (Veledina et al. 2019).
    Adopted as the framework for the interpretation; no direct measurement of disc thickness is provided in this work.
  • domain assumption The polarized optical and X-ray component originates from a shock between the pulsar wind and the inner accretion flow, with aligned polarization angles (Baglio et al. 2024).
    Used to interpret the optical polarization drop as an unpolarized flaring component added to the shock component.
  • standard math Radio flares with optically thick rise and optically thin decay are produced by synchrotron self-absorption in jet ejecta or internal shocks (Fender & Bright 2019).
    Standard jet emission model used to interpret the observed radio spectral index evolution.
  • domain assumption Minimum energy estimates assume equipartition between particles and magnetic field for each ejection.
    Standard but unverified assumption underlying the jet energy and jet power estimates in Section 4 and Appendix D.
  • domain assumption A typical compact jet spectrum with a flat index below a break frequency and alpha = -0.6 above it applies during the flaring mode.
    Used for the jet radiative luminosity estimate; the break frequency is taken from prior work and not measured during flaring.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Multi-band study of the flaring mode emission in the transitional millisecond pulsar PSR J1023+0038." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/BIL6T47D

@misc{pith2026250206953,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Multi-band study of the flaring mode emission in the transitional millisecond pulsar PSR J1023+0038},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/BIL6T47D}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.06953}
}
read the original abstract

We present a comprehensive study of the flaring mode of the transitional millisecond pulsar (tMSP) PSR J1023+0038 during its X-ray sub-luminous state, using strictly simultaneous X-ray, UV, optical, and radio observations. The X-ray flares exhibit UV and optical counterparts and coincide with the brightest radio flare observed in the past decade, reaching 1.2 mJy at 6 GHz and lasting ~1 hour. During the flare, the optical polarization drops from ~1.4% to ~0.5%, indicating the emergence of an unpolarized component. We propose that the thickening of the disc, which enlarges the shock region between the pulsar wind and the accretion flow and may drive the X-ray flaring observed in tMSPs, enhances the ionization level of the disc, thereby generating an increased number of free electrons. These electrons could then be channelled by magnetic field lines into the jet. This increased jet mass-loading could drive the associated radio and optical variability. The radio spectral evolution during flares is consistent with synchrotron self-absorption in jet ejecta or internal shocks within the compact jet. We infer radio polarization upper limits (<8.7%, <2.3%, and <8.2%, before, during, and after the radio flare) that further support a compact jet origin but do not rule out discrete ejections. Our findings suggest that tMSPs could serve as essential laboratories for investigating jet-launching mechanisms, mainly because they operate under very low mass accretion rates. This accretion regime has not been explored before in the context of the accretion-ejection coupling.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.06953 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Multi-band time series and evo￾lution of optical and radio parameters (including data presented by Baglio et al. 2024). Error bars represent the 1σ confi￾dence levels. In the seventh and eighth pan￾els, horizontal dashed red lines mark the av￾erage optical polarisation degree (Popt) and angle (PAopt), with shaded areas indicat￾ing one standard deviation about the mean. In the ninth panel, a horizontal dotted line sh… view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Fast optical spectroscopic observations of PSR J1023+0038 over one orbital period

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 accept novelty 6.0 of 10

    Full-orbit minute-cadence optical spectroscopy of PSR J1023+0038 reveals short-timescale line variability and asymmetric Doppler maps consistent with outflows.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

57 extracted references · 43 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in " " * FUNCTION format....

  3. [3]

    1997, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol

    Alexander , T. 1997, in Astrophysics and Space Science Library, Vol. 218, Astronomical Time Series, ed. D. Maoz , A. Sternberg , & E. M. Leibowitz , 163

    1997

  4. [4]

    2013, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1302.1508

    Alexander , T. 2013, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:1302.1508

    arXiv 2013

  5. [5]

    2017, Nat

    Ambrosino , F., Papitto , A., Stella , L., et al. 2017, Nat. Astron., 1, 854

    work page 2017

  6. [6]

    M., Bogdanov , S., Patruno , A., et al

    Archibald , A. M., Bogdanov , S., Patruno , A., et al. 2015, , 807, 62

    work page 2015

  7. [7]

    M., Stairs , I

    Archibald , A. M., Stairs , I. H., Ransom , S. M., et al. 2009, Science, 324, 1411

    work page 2009

  8. [8]

    C., Coti Zelati , F., Campana , S., et al

    Baglio , M. C., Coti Zelati , F., Campana , S., et al. 2023, , 677, A30

    work page 2023

Show all 57 references
  1. [9]

    C., Coti Zelati , F., Di Marco , A., et al

    Baglio , M. C., Coti Zelati , F., Di Marco , A., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.13260

    2024 arXiv

  2. [10]

    C., Russell , D

    Baglio , M. C., Russell , D. M., Casella , P., et al. 2018, , 867, 114

    2018

  3. [11]

    C., Russell , D

    Baglio , M. C., Russell , D. M., Crespi , S., et al. 2020, , 905, 87

    2020

  4. [12]

    2022, SoftwareX, 19, 101194

    Baldini , L., Bucciantini , N., Di Lalla , N., et al. 2022, SoftwareX, 19, 101194

    2022

  5. [13]

    Blandford , R. D. & K \"o nigl , A. 1979, , 232, 34

    1979

  6. [14]

    M., Bassa , C., et al

    Bogdanov , S., Archibald , A. M., Bassa , C., et al. 2015, , 806, 148

    2015

  7. [15]

    T., Miller-Jones , J

    Bogdanov , S., Deller , A. T., Miller-Jones , J. C. A., et al. 2018, , 856, 54

    2018

  8. [16]

    2013, , 432, 931

    Brocksopp , C., Corbel , S., Tzioumis , A., et al. 2013, , 432, 931

    2013

  9. [17]

    N., Hill , J

    Burrows , D. N., Hill , J. E., Nousek , J. A., et al. 2005, Space Science Reviews, 120, 165

    2005

  10. [18]

    J., et al

    Carotenuto , F., Fender , R., Tetarenko , A. J., et al. 2024, , 533, 4188

    2024

  11. [19]

    2022, , 134, 114501

    CASA Team , Bean , B., Bhatnagar , S., et al. 2022, , 134, 114501

    2022

  12. [20]

    P., Tzioumis , A

    Corbel , S., Fender , R. P., Tzioumis , A. K., et al. 2000, , 359, 251

    2000

  13. [21]

    A., Campana , S., & Esposito , P

    Coti Zelati , F., Rea , N., Pons , J. A., Campana , S., & Esposito , P. 2018, , 474, 961

    2018

  14. [22]

    A., Coriat , M., Miller-Jones , J

    Curran , P. A., Coriat , M., Miller-Jones , J. C. A., et al. 2014, , 437, 3265

    2014

  15. [23]

    T., Camilo , F., Reynolds , J

    Deller , A. T., Camilo , F., Reynolds , J. E., & Halpern , J. P. 2012, , 748, L1

    2012

  16. [24]

    2023, , 165, 143

    Di Marco , A., Soffitta , P., Costa , E., et al. 2023, , 165, 143

    2023

  17. [25]

    2007, , 15, 1

    Done , C., Gierli \'n ski , M., & Kubota , A. 2007, , 15, 1

    2007

  18. [26]

    & Bright , J

    Fender , R. & Bright , J. 2019, , 489, 4836

    2019

  19. [27]

    P., Belloni , T

    Fender , R. P., Belloni , T. M., & Gallo , E. 2004, , 355, 1105

    2004

  20. [28]

    P., Mooley , K

    Fender , R. P., Mooley , K. P., Motta , S. E., et al. 2023, , 518, 1243

    2023

  21. [29]

    S., et al

    Gandhi , P., Bachetti , M., Dhillon , V. S., et al. 2017, Nature Astronomy, 1, 859

    2017

  22. [30]

    S., Durant , M., et al

    Gandhi , P., Dhillon , V. S., Durant , M., et al. 2010, , 407, 2166

    2010

  23. [31]

    & Hjellming , R

    Han , X. & Hjellming , R. M. 1992, , 400, 304

    1992

  24. [32]

    H \"o gbom , J. A. 1974, , 15, 417

    1974

  25. [33]

    K., Sivakoff , G

    Hughes , A. K., Sivakoff , G. R., Macpherson , C. E., et al. 2023, , 521, 185

    2023

  26. [34]

    D., Hern \'a ndez Santisteban , J

    Jaodand , A. D., Hern \'a ndez Santisteban , J. V., Archibald , A. M., et al. 2021, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2102.13145

    2021 arXiv

  27. [35]

    Kelly , B. C. 2007, , 665, 1489

    2007

  28. [36]

    R., Clark , C

    Kennedy , M. R., Clark , C. J., Voisin , G., & Breton , R. P. 2018, , 477, 1120

    2018

  29. [37]

    S., Perkins , S., & Smirnov , O

    Kenyon , J. S., Perkins , S., & Smirnov , O. 2022, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 532, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems XXX, ed. J. E. Ruiz , F. Pierfedereci , & P. Teuben , 349

    2022

  30. [38]

    2014, , 795, 72

    Linares , M. 2014, , 795, 72

    2014

  31. [39]

    2022, , 512, 5269

    Linares , M., De Marco , B., Wijnands , R., & van der Klis , M. 2022, , 512, 5269

    2022

  32. [40]

    2014, , 443, 299

    Malzac , J. 2014, , 443, 299

    2014

  33. [41]

    Miller-Jones , J. C. A., Tetarenko , A. J., Sivakoff , G. R., et al. 2019, , 569, 374

    2019

  34. [42]

    2022, , 660, A63

    Miraval Zanon , A., Ambrosino , F., Coti Zelati , F., et al. 2022, , 660, A63

    2022

  35. [43]

    E., Kajava , J

    Motta , S. E., Kajava , J. J. E., S \'a nchez-Fern \'a ndez , C., Giustini , M., & Kuulkers , E. 2017, , 468, 981

    2017

  36. [44]

    R., McKiconley , B., Hurley-Walker , N., et al

    Offringa , A. R., McKiconley , B., Hurley-Walker , N., et al. 2014, , 444, 606

    2014

  37. [45]

    A., Gandhi , P., Shahbaz , T., et al

    Paice , J. A., Gandhi , P., Shahbaz , T., et al. 2019, , 490, L62

    2019

  38. [46]

    2019, , 882, 104

    Papitto , A., Ambrosino , F., Stella , L., et al. 2019, , 882, 104

    2019

  39. [47]

    Roming , P. W. A., Kennedy , T. E., Mason , K. O., et al. 2005, Space Science Reviews, 120, 95

    2005

  40. [48]

    D., Lucchini , M., Tetarenko , A

    Russell , T. D., Lucchini , M., Tetarenko , A. J., et al. 2020, , 498, 5772

    2020

  41. [49]

    D., Miller-Jones , J

    Russell , T. D., Miller-Jones , J. C. A., Curran , P. A., et al. 2015, , 450, 1745

    2015

  42. [50]

    W., Archibald , A

    Stappers , B. W., Archibald , A. M., Hessels , J. W. T., et al. 2014, , 790, 39

    2014

  43. [51]

    Stetson , P. B. 1987, , 99, 191

    1987

  44. [52]

    P., Yang , C., An , H., et al

    Tendulkar , S. P., Yang , C., An , H., et al. 2014, , 791, 77

    2014

  45. [53]

    J., Casella , P., Miller-Jones , J

    Tetarenko , A. J., Casella , P., Miller-Jones , J. C. A., et al. 2021 a , , 504, 3862

    2021

  46. [54]

    J., Casella , P., Miller-Jones , J

    Tetarenko , A. J., Casella , P., Miller-Jones , J. C. A., et al. 2021 b , , 504, 3862

    2021

  47. [55]

    J., Sivakoff , G

    Tetarenko , A. J., Sivakoff , G. R., Miller-Jones , J. C. A., et al. 2017, , 469, 3141

    2017

  48. [56]

    Vaillancourt , J. E. 2006, , 118, 1340

    2006

  49. [57]

    a ttil \

    Veledina , A., N \"a ttil \"a , J., & Beloborodov , A. M. 2019, , 884, 144

    2019

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.