Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 cited by

Investigating Creativity in Humans and Generative AI Through Circles Exercises

Not yet reviewed by Pith; the record is open.

This paper has not been read by Pith yet. Machine review is queued; the pith claim, tier, and objections will appear here once it completes.

SPECIMEN: schema-true, not a live event

T0 review · schema-true

One-sentence machine reading of the paper's core claim.

pith:XXXXXXXX · record.json · timestamp

arxiv 2502.07292 v1 pith:XACZEAMO submitted 2025-02-11 cs.HC

classification cs.HC
keywords creativityhumansgenaicirclescreativegenerativehowevernarrow
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal
0 comments
read the original abstract

Generative AI (GenAI) is transforming the creativity process. However, as presented in this paper, GenAI encounters "narrow creativity" barriers. We observe that both humans and GenAI focus on limited subsets of the design space. We investigate this phenomenon using the "Circles Exercise," a creativity test widely used to examine the creativity of humans. Quantitative analysis reveals that humans tend to generate familiar, high-frequency ideas, while GenAI produces a larger volume of incremental innovations at a low cost. However, similar to humans, it struggles to significantly expand creative boundaries. Moreover, advanced prompting strategies, such as Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting, mitigate narrow creativity issues but still fall short of substantially broadening the creative scope of humans and GenAI. These findings underscore both the challenges and opportunities for advancing GenAI-powered human creativity support tools.

Discussion (0). Sign in to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. An Exploratory Study on Multi-modal Generative AI in AR Storytelling

    cs.HC 2025-05 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    The paper maps how storytellers prefer to use AI-generated text, audio, images, videos, and 3D content to augment AR stories, based on a 223-video analysis and two user studies with 30 participants.

Pith tools