Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 6 minor 79 references

Candidate intermediate-mass black hole discovered in an extremely young low-metallicity cluster in the tadpole galaxy KUG 1138+327

T0 review · 1 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗

Pith's one-line read The paper argues that the ultraluminous X-ray source X-1 in the tadpole galaxy KUG 1138+327 is most plausibly a fast-spinning intermediate-mass black hole of about 10^5 solar masses accreting from a companion star.

desk verdict Solid new data on an extreme ULX, but the IMBH mass claim is a model-transformed parameter, not a secure discovery. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.07304 v1 pith:P5EM5JEX submitted 2025-02-11 astro-ph.HE

Q. Daniel Wang , Juergen Ott This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HE
keywords intermediate-massblackholeultraluminousX-raysourcelow-metallicitystarburstmulticoloraccretiondiskradiojettadpolegalaxyKUG1138+327ChandraVLAcontinuum
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper uses new Chandra and VLA observations to argue that X-1, an ultraluminous X-ray source with a 0.3-10 keV luminosity of about $10^{40.3}$ erg/s sitting in the youngest star cluster of the tadpole galaxy KUG 1138+327, is most plausibly an accreting intermediate-mass black hole of roughly $10^5$ solar masses. The case is built from a multicolor disk X-ray spectrum, month-scale variability by a factor of about 2, and a ~200 pc double-lobed nonthermal radio counterpart whose X-ray and radio luminosities match the fundamental plane for black-hole activity. If correct, this would put a massive black hole in an off-center cluster only 2-4 million years old and in gas at about 6% of solar metallicity. The authors are careful to note that a super-Eddington stellar-mass accretor, a ULX pulsar, or a young supernova remnant cannot be fully excluded.

What carries the argument

The load-bearing tools are the multicolor accretion-disk spectral models (diskbb/diskpbb) and the conversion of the fitted normalization into an inner-disk radius, $R_{\rm in} = \xi \kappa^2 r_{\rm in}$ with boundary factor $\xi = 0.41$ and color-correction $\kappa = 1.7$, which turns $R_{\rm in}$ into a black-hole mass and inclination. The fitted temperature index $p \approx 0.68$ (90% range 0.57-0.80) is used to distinguish a standard thin disk from a slim super-Eddington disk, for which $p = 0.5$. Independently, the $M_{\rm BH}$-$L_X$-$L_R$ fundamental plane for black-hole activity converts the measured 5 GHz radio luminosity and 2-10 keV X-ray luminosity into a mass of about $10^{5.4}\,M_\odot$, and the observed He II and [Ar IV] lines without Wolf-Rayet features constrain the starburst age to 2-4 Myr.

What would settle it

A deep, high-throughput X-ray observation that detects coherent X-ray pulsations with a spin period in the 0.4-40 s range would show X-1 is an accreting neutron-star ULX pulsar, ruling out the IMBH interpretation; conversely, detecting a quasi-periodic oscillation in the mHz range, or tracking $L_{\rm bol} \propto T^4$ across flux states instead of $L_{\rm bol} \propto T^2$, would support the standard-disk IMBH picture.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

X-1 is an extreme ultraluminous X-ray source at 24.5 Mpc with a mean luminosity of about $10^{40.3}$ erg/s in the 0.3-10 keV band and factor-of-two variability on month timescales. The authors claim that a disk blackbody (diskpbb) fit with temperature index $p = 0.68$ ($0.57-0.80$) represents a standard Shakura-Sunyaev accretion disk around a fast-spinning black hole whose inner-disk radius, converted with color correction $\kappa = 1.7$ and boundary factor $\xi = 0.41$, implies a mass of about $10^5\,M_\odot$ and a disk inclination above roughly $39^\circ$ (for maximal spin). The VLA 1.5 GHz image shows a double-lobed radio structure extending ~200 pc with spectral index $\alpha \approx 0.7$; using the black-hole fundamental plane, the radio and X-ray luminosities independently give $M_{\rm BH} \sim 10^{5.2-5.4}\,M_\odot$. The starburst age is revised from ~0.5 Myr to 2-4 Myr on the basis of He II and [Ar IV] emission without Wolf-Rayet features, making it possible for a massive star to have evolved into the accretor. The paper's preferred conclusion is an accreting IMBH, with the alternatives disfavored but not ruled out.

Load-bearing premise

The inference collapses if the X-ray emission is not a standard thin accretion disk seen through the assumed color correction; a slim super-Eddington disk, a beamed outflow, or a hot thermal plasma would change the derived black-hole mass by orders of magnitude.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • X-1 would become one of the clearest off-nuclear intermediate-mass black hole candidates known, in a cluster young enough to constrain IMBH formation channels.
  • The ~200 pc double-lobed radio jet would be the longest detected from a ULX, showing that sub-Eddington IMBH accretion can drive jet feedback on 100 pc scales inside a dwarf galaxy.
  • The starburst age must be 2-4 Myr, not ~0.5 Myr, meaning massive-star evolution and IMBH formation can occur within a few million years in low-metallicity gas.
  • Such systems may be common where cold low-metallicity gas accretes onto galaxies, making KUG 1138+327 a local template for extreme X-ray sources in high-redshift galaxies.
  • The ULX's EUV radiation may power the He II and [Ar IV] nebular lines, so those lines cannot be assumed to trace only massive stars in distant metal-poor galaxies.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • If the IMBH identification is confirmed, the same multiwavelength recipe (multicolor disk fit plus fundamental-plane radio/X-ray scaling) applied to other extreme ULXs in metal-poor dwarf galaxies should uncover a population of similar objects; this is a testable prediction beyond the paper's single object.
  • The double-lobed radio source offers a direct observational test: if X-1 is a sub-Eddington IMBH, its radio and X-ray luminosities should track each other on month-year timescales along the fundamental plane, whereas a super-Eddington stellar-mass accretor would not show a comparably luminous jet.
  • The paper leaves open whether the He II and [Ar IV] emission comes from the ULX or from massive stars; a spatially resolved UV spectrum of the cluster could separate those contributions and would also check the revised 2-4 Myr age.
  • By analogy, bright ULXs in high-redshift galaxies that show disk-like X-ray spectra and extended radio emission could be IMBH candidates, not merely super-Eddington stellar-mass systems.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper reports Chandra and VLA observations of the off-center starburst in the low-metallicity dwarf galaxy KUG 1138+327. A point-like X-ray source X-1 is detected with a 0.3-10 keV luminosity of ~1e40.3 erg/s, significant variability by a factor of ~2 on month timescales, and a position coincident with the central super stellar cluster. The X-ray spectrum is fit with powerlaw, broken powerlaw, diskbb, and diskpbb models; diskpbb returns p = 0.68 and NH = 0. The paper argues that the spectrum, luminosity, and variability are best explained by a sub-Eddington standard accretion disk around a fast-spinning intermediate-mass black hole (IMBH) of ~1e5 solar masses, supported by an elongated ~200 pc double-lobed nonthermal radio counterpart that yields a fundamental-plane mass estimate of ~1e5.2-1e5.4 solar masses. The cluster age is revised from ~0.5 Myr to ~2-4 Myr using the presence of HeII and [ArIV] lines without Wolf-Rayet features, and the paper concludes that X-1 is a candidate IMBH formed in a young, low-metallicity starburst.

Significance. If the IMBH interpretation holds, this would be a remarkable result: a ~1e5 solar mass black hole in a 2-4 Myr old, ~6% solar metallicity cluster, with a ~200 pc radio jet, offering rare constraints on IMBH formation in low-metallicity environments and on the nature of extreme ULXs. The observational work itself is valuable: the paper presents new Chandra and VLA data with careful astrometric correction, a well-detected variable X-ray source, and a plausible radio counterpart. The authors are appropriately hedged in several places, explicitly noting that supercritical accretion cannot be ruled out and that the radio association is assumed. However, the central quantitative claim — the IMBH mass of ~1e5 solar masses — rests on a chain of model-dependent transformations and an age argument with a partly circular structure, so the evidence is not yet at the level of a secure IMBH discovery.

major comments (1)
  1. [Section 4.4] The central claim, while hedged in the body, is still framed as a discovery in the title and abstract. The chain of assumptions — standard-disk identification, adopted kappa and xi, distance, radio-lobe association, and revised age — means that the evidence currently supports a candidate rather than a confirmed IMBH. The summary's statement that the spectrum and luminosity are 'most consistently explained by a fast-spinning IMBH' overstates the discrimination power of the data, given that equally good fits are obtained with other phenomenological models and that Section 4.2 concedes viable alternatives. I recommend that the mass and spin be presented as conditional values and that the title's 'discovered' be reconsidered.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Table 2] The diskpbb p entry reads '0.68(0.57-0.80' and is missing a closing parenthesis; the broken-power-law break energy entry should specify units (keV) for clarity.
  2. [Section 2] The phrase 'using a robust parameter of 0.5' should be expanded to 'the Briggs robust parameter of 0.5' for clarity.
  3. [Abstract and Section 5] The radio counterpart is described as 'probably the longest detected from such a source' in the abstract and 'probably the longest known for a ULX' in Section 5; these formulations should be harmonized, and a quantitative comparison with previously known ULX radio lobes would strengthen the claim.
  4. [Data Availability] The data availability statement lists a Chandra DOI but no VLA archive identifier; the VLA project code and access route should be included for reproducibility.
  5. [Section 4.5] The phrase 'SDSS spectrum (with a fiber diameter of 3′′covering most of the starburst)' is missing a space before 'covering', and the SDSS data release or MJD should be specified for reproducibility.
  6. [Figure 2B] The caption for Figure 2B does not list the radio contour levels; the levels should be stated explicitly or referenced to Figure 1B.

Circularity Check

1 steps flagged · score 4.0 of 10

Age estimate is tuned to the IMBH progenitor timescale and then used as independent support for the IMBH; the mass estimate itself retains independent empirical content.

  1. self definitional [Section 4.5, formation argument; Summary bullet in Section 5; echoed in Abstract]
    "We estimate the age of the starburst to be about 2-4 Myr to allow for the minimum time for massive stars to evolve into X-1 and to account for the lack of the Wolf-Rayet features."

    The revised age is explicitly chosen so that massive stars have had enough time to form the putative IMBH. The original photometric age of ~0.5 Myr is discarded partly because it is too short for any BH to have formed, and the new 2-4 Myr range is then cited as evidence that the cluster can host the ULX/IMBH. Thus the formation-timing premise is constructed from the desired conclusion, making that part of the derivation self-referential. The independent constraints (He II/[Ar IV], no Wolf-Rayet features) set only rough bounds and do not remove the circularity, because the lower bound of 2 Myr is driven by the assumed IMBH evolutionary timescale.

full rationale

The central mass claim of ~10^5 Msun is not circular: it comes from the empirical MBH-LX-LR fundamental plane applied to measured radio and X-ray luminosities, and the X-ray spectral fit is an explicit model interpretation rather than a reduction to the IMBH hypothesis. The substantive circular step is the age argument. The paper revises the previously estimated 0.5 Myr cluster age because that age is too young to form a BH, then sets the new age to 2-4 Myr 'to allow for the minimum time for massive stars to evolve into X-1', and finally uses this revised age as support for the IMBH scenario. This is a partial circularity in the formation argument, not in the quantitative mass derivation, so a score of 4 is appropriate rather than a higher score.

Assumptions & free parameters 6 free parameters · 5 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The mass and age estimates rely on several adopted inputs: a 24.5 Mpc distance, disk color-correction factors (kappa=1.7, xi=0.41), the extrapolation of the fundamental plane to the IMBH regime, the assumption that the radio lobes are a jet from X-1, and a stellar-evolution and emission-line age scale that places the cluster at 2-4 Myr. These are standard tools in the field, but the central claim depends on all of them simultaneously.

free parameters (6)
  • Hydrogen column density NH = 0 to 4.6e21 cm^-2 in model fits; preferred 1e21 cm^-2
    TBabs absorption parameter fitted in each spectral model; bolometric luminosity and disk parameters are evaluated at preferred N_H = 1e21 cm^-2 (Section 3, Table 2).
  • diskpbb temperature index p = 0.68 (0.57-0.80)
    Free parameter in the preferred disk model; value 0.68 is used to argue for a standard disk, and p=0.5 (slim disk) is excluded at 90% confidence (Section 3, Table 2; Section 4.3).
  • diskbb/diskpbb normalization N = 5.7e-3 (preferred)
    Fitted normalization converted to inner-disk radius R_in = 2.2e2 (cos i)^-1/2 km using assumed distance and correction factors (Section 4.3).
  • Spectral hardening factor kappa = 1.7
    Adopted from Shimura & Takahara 1995; linearly scales the inferred inner-disk radius and hence the mass and inclination constraints (Section 4.3).
  • Boundary correction factor xi = 0.41
    Adopted from Kubota et al. 1998; scales R_in via R_in = xi * kappa^2 * r_in (Section 4.3).
  • Distance D = 24.5 Mpc (assumed)
    Assumed distance to KUG 1138+327; X-ray luminosity and disk radius scale with D^2 or D (Sections 1, 3).
assumptions (5)
  • domain assumption The X-ray spectrum of X-1 is emitted by an optically thick, geometrically thin Shakura-Sunyaev accretion disk around a black hole.
    The diskbb/diskpbb interpretation and the use of p=0.68 as evidence for a standard disk presuppose this disk model (Section 3, Table 2; Section 4.3).
  • domain assumption The fundamental plane relation for black hole activity calibrated on AGNs and stellar-mass BHs applies to X-1.
    Used to estimate M_BH approximately 10^5.2-5.4 Msun from radio and X-ray luminosities (Section 4.4, after Gultekin et al. 2019).
  • domain assumption X-ray emission is roughly isotropic, so L_X approximately 10^40.3 erg/s is not strongly beamed.
    The comparison to the Eddington limit and the minimum mass estimate assume isotropic emission (Section 4.3); the authors consider beaming but do not model it quantitatively.
  • domain assumption The SDSS emission-line ratios (He II and [Ar IV]) and the absence of Wolf-Rayet features date the starburst to 2-4 Myr.
    This age estimate is used to make formation of a massive BH progenitor feasible (Section 4.5).
  • ad hoc to paper The elongated radio emission is physically associated with X-1 and powered by a jet from the accretor.
    Stated as an assumption in Section 4.4; the double-lobed morphology is at 200 pc scale and the association is not proven.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Candidate intermediate-mass black hole discovered in an extremely young low-metallicity cluster in the tadpole galaxy KUG 1138+327." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/P5EM5JEX

@misc{pith2026250207304,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Candidate intermediate-mass black hole discovered in an extremely young low-metallicity cluster in the tadpole galaxy KUG 1138+327},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/P5EM5JEX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.07304}
}
read the original abstract

We explore what unusual products a starburst of about 6% solar metallicity and a mean estimated age of ~0.5 Myr can produce in KUG 1138 + 327 at a distance of 24.5 Mpc. Chandra X-ray observations show a dominant point-like source with an average 0.3-10 keV luminosity of 10^{40.3} erg/s and variability by a factor of ~2 over months. This extreme ultraluminous X-ray source (ULX) is apparently associated with the young central cluster. A multicolor disk modeling of the X-ray spectrum of the source suggests a standard accretion around a black hole. It also has a morphologically elongated nonthermal radio continuum counterpart on the scale of ~200 pc, probably the longest detected from such a source. The radio, optical, and X-ray findings suggest that it could well be an intermediate-mass black hole undergoing sub-Eddington accretion from a massive star companion. Accounting for the presence of the ULX and the prominent emission lines HeII\lambda4658 and [ArIV]\lambda4711 while lacking Wolf-Rayet spectral features, we estimate the true age of the starburst to be about 2-4 Myr. Only with such a moderate age can the starburst host this extraordinary ULX, probably triggered by a recent influx of extremely low-metallicity gas. This study demonstrates the potential of multiwavelength studies of low-metallicity starbursts to provide insights into what may commonly occur in high-redshift galaxies.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.07304 by the authors.

Figure 2
Figure 2. (A) Chandra ACIS-S 0.3-7 keV count image, which is constructed with all the observations listed in Ta￾ble 1, together with the two detected discrete X-ray sources circled. The separation of them is 5. ′′2. (B) VLA 1.5 GHz intensity image with the overlaid contours same as in Fig. 1B. calibrator. The total observation time was 1 hour, with about 30 min at the source. The observation bandwidth is 1 GHz in standard con… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Flux curve of X-1 during OBS II-V, separated by the long vertical (red) lines. The count rates are calculated in the 0.3-7 keV band, and the local background is subtracted. The long horizontal line marks the average count rate over the entire period of the four observations, while the short green and blue lines represent the average rate and its 1σ error bars of each observation. monly used phenomenological spectral… view at source ↗
Figure 4
Figure 4. (A) Chandra ACIS-S spectral data of X-1, together with the best-fit MCD model TBabs*diskpbb (black line; [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png] view at source ↗

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

79 extracted references · 11 canonical work pages

  1. [1]

    D., Abraham, S., et al

    Abbott, R., Abbott, T. D., Abraham, S., et al. 2020, PhRvL, 125, 101102, doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.101102

    doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.101102 2020

  2. [2]

    1988, ApJ, 332, 646, doi: 10.1086/166683

    Szuszkiewicz, E. 1988, ApJ, 332, 646, doi: 10.1086/166683

    doi:10.1086/166683 1988

  3. [3]

    2014, Science, 345, 1330, doi: 10.1126/science.1251053

    Alexander, T., & Natarajan, P. 2014, Science, 345, 1330, doi: 10.1126/science.1251053

    doi:10.1126/science.1251053 2014

  4. [4]

    Arnaud, K. A. 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, ed. G. H. Jacoby & J. Barnes, 17

    1996

  5. [5]

    F., & Mezcua, M

    Askar, A., Baldassare, V. F., & Mezcua, M. 2023, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2311.12118, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2311.12118

    arXiv doi:10.48550/arxiv.2311.12118 2023

  6. [6]

    J., & Scott, P

    Asplund, M., Grevesse, N., Sauval, A. J., & Scott, P. 2009, ARA&A, 47, 481, doi: 10.1146/annurev.astro.46.060407.145222

    arXiv 2009

  7. [7]

    2016, Astronomische Nachrichten, 337, 349, doi: 10.1002/asna.201612312

    Bachetti, M. 2016, Astronomische Nachrichten, 337, 349, doi: 10.1002/asna.201612312

    work page doi:10.1002/asna.201612312 2016

  8. [8]

    A., Walton, D

    Bachetti, M., Harrison, F. A., Walton, D. J., et al. 2014, Nature, 514, 202, doi: 10.1038/nature13791

    doi:10.1038/nature13791 2014

Show all 79 references
  1. [9]

    S., Mezcua, M., Comerford, J

    Barrows, R. S., Mezcua, M., Comerford, J. M., & Stern, D. 2024, ApJ, 964, 187, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad25fe

    2024 doi

  2. [10]

    Begelman, M. C. 2002, ApJL, 568, L97, doi: 10.1086/340457

    2002 doi

  3. [11]

    2020, ApJL, 905, L15, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abcbf1

    Belczynski, K. 2020, ApJL, 905, L15, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/abcbf1

    2020 doi

  4. [12]

    2010, ApJL, 715, L138, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/715/2/L138 11

    Belczynski, K., Dominik, M., Bulik, T., et al. 2010, ApJL, 715, L138, doi: 10.1088/2041-8205/715/2/L138 11

    2010 doi

  5. [13]

    Bi, D., Schleicher, D. R. G., & Escala, A. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.06495. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.06495

    2024 arXiv

  6. [14]

    C., Savage, B

    Bohlin, R. C., Savage, B. D., & Drake, J. F. 1978, ApJ, 224, 132, doi: 10.1086/156357

    1978 doi

  7. [15]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.07831

    Burrows, A., Wang, T., & Vartanyan, D. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.07831. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.07831

    2024 arXiv

  8. [16]

    M., Weaver, K

    Cann, J. M., Weaver, K. A., Pfeifle, R. W., et al. 2024, ApJ, 961, 178, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0a6b

    2024 doi

  9. [17]

    2023, MNRAS, 521, 2845, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad689

    Chiaki, G., Chon, S., Omukai, K., et al. 2023, MNRAS, 521, 2845, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad689

    2023 doi

  10. [18]

    2020, MNRAS, 494, 2851, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa863

    Chon, S., & Omukai, K. 2020, MNRAS, 494, 2851, doi: 10.1093/mnras/staa863

    2020 doi

  11. [19]

    Colbert, E. J. M., & Mushotzky, R. F. 1999, ApJ, 519, 89, doi: 10.1086/307356

    1999 doi

  12. [20]

    2024, A&A, 691, A231, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450699

    Deng, Y., Li, H., Liu, B., et al. 2024, A&A, 691, A231, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202450699

    2024 doi

  13. [21]

    Greene, J. E. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.14535. https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.14535

    2024 arXiv

  14. [22]

    2003, ApJ, 597, 780, doi: 10.1086/378586

    Ebisawa, K., ˙Zycki, P., Kubota, A., Mizuno, T., & Watarai, K.-y. 2003, ApJ, 597, 780, doi: 10.1086/378586

    2003 doi

  15. [23]

    Coe, D. A. 2007, ApJ, 658, 763, doi: 10.1086/511667

    2007 doi

  16. [24]

    M., Elmegreen, B

    Elmegreen, D. M., Elmegreen, B. G., S´ anchez Almeida, J., et al. 2016, ApJ, 825, 145, doi: 10.3847/0004-637X/825/2/145

    2016 doi

  17. [25]

    1989, ARA&A, 27, 87, doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.27.090189.000511 F¨ urst, F., Walton, D

    Fabbiano, G. 1989, ARA&A, 27, 87, doi: 10.1146/annurev.aa.27.090189.000511 F¨ urst, F., Walton, D. J., Israel, G. L., et al. 2023, A&A, 672, A140, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202245048

    1989

  18. [26]

    2024, MNRAS, 534, 151, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2048

    Gabrielli, F., Lapi, A., Boco, L., et al. 2024, MNRAS, 534, 151, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae2048

    2024 doi

  19. [27]

    D., Appleton, P

    Gao, Y., Wang, Q. D., Appleton, P. N., & Lucas, R. A. 2003, ApJL, 596, L171, doi: 10.1086/379598

    2003 doi

  20. [28]

    R., Johnson, B

    Garofali, K., Basu-Zych, A. R., Johnson, B. D., et al. 2024, ApJ, 960, 13, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ad0a6a

    2024 doi

  21. [29]

    C., Roberts, T

    Gladstone, J. C., Roberts, T. P., & Done, C. 2009, MNRAS, 397, 1836, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2009.15123.x G¨ otberg, Y., de Mink, S. E., Groh, J. H., et al. 2018, A&A, 615, A78, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201732274

    2009

  22. [30]

    E., Strader, J., & Ho, L

    Greene, J. E., Strader, J., & Ho, L. C. 2020, ARA&A, 58, 257, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-032620-021835 G¨ ultekin, K., King, A. L., Cackett, E. M., et al. 2019, ApJ, 871, 80, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aaf6b9 G´ urpide, A., Castro Segura, N., Soria, R., & Middleton, M. 2024, MNRAS...

    2020 doi

  23. [31]

    Hartmann, D. H. 2003, ApJ, 591, 288, doi: 10.1086/375341

    2003 doi

  24. [32]

    Kaaret, P., Feng, H., & Roberts, T. P. 2017, ARA&A, 55, 303, doi: 10.1146/annurev-astro-091916-055259

    2017 doi

  25. [33]

    2023, New Astronomy Reviews, 96, 101672, doi: 10.1016/j.newar.2022.101672

    King, A., Lasota, J.-P., & Middleton, M. 2023, New Astronomy Reviews, 96, 101672, doi: 10.1016/j.newar.2022.101672

    2023

  26. [34]

    King, A. R. 2004, MNRAS, 347, L18, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2004.07403.x

    2004

  27. [35]

    2001, ApJL, 552, L109, doi: 10.1086/320343

    Elvis, M. 2001, ApJL, 552, L109, doi: 10.1086/320343

    2001 doi

  28. [36]

    1998, PASJ, 50, 667, doi: 10.1093/pasj/50.6.667

    Kubota, A., Tanaka, Y., Makishima, K., et al. 1998, PASJ, 50, 667, doi: 10.1093/pasj/50.6.667

    1998 doi

  29. [37]

    A., Whalen, D

    Latif, M. A., Whalen, D. J., Khochfar, S., Herrington, N. P., & Woods, T. E. 2022, Nature, 607, 48, doi: 10.1038/s41586-022-04813-y

    2022 doi

  30. [38]

    D., Eufrasio, R

    Lehmer, B. D., Eufrasio, R. T., Basu-Zych, A., et al. 2022, ApJ, 930, 135, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac63a7 —. 2021, ApJ, 907, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/abcec1

    2022 doi

  31. [39]

    D., et al

    Leitherer, C., Schaerer, D., Goldader, J. D., et al. 1999, ApJS, 123, 3, doi: 10.1086/313233

    1999 doi

  32. [40]

    F., et al

    Linden, T., Kalogera, V., Sepinsky, J. F., et al. 2010, ApJ, 725, 1984, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/725/2/1984

    2010 doi

  33. [41]

    1986, ApJ, 308, 635, doi: 10.1086/164534

    Makishima, K., Maejima, Y., Mitsuda, K., et al. 1986, ApJ, 308, 635, doi: 10.1086/164534

    1986 doi

  34. [42]

    2000, ApJ, 535, 632, doi: 10.1086/308868

    Makishima, K., Kubota, A., Mizuno, T., et al. 2000, ApJ, 535, 632, doi: 10.1086/308868

    2000 doi

  35. [43]

    2013, MNRAS, 429, 2298, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sts500

    Mapelli, M., Zampieri, L., Ripamonti, E., & Bressan, A. 2013, MNRAS, 429, 2298, doi: 10.1093/mnras/sts500

    2013 doi

  36. [45]

    2024, A&A, 682, A34, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347165

    Merloni, A., Lamer, G., Liu, T., et al. 2024, A&A, 682, A34, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347165

    2024 doi

  37. [46]

    P., Lobanov, A

    Mezcua, M., Roberts, T. P., Lobanov, A. P., & Sutton, A. D. 2015, MNRAS, 448, 1893, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stv143

    2015 doi

  38. [47]

    2023, ApJL, 943, L5, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acae25

    Mezcua, M., Siudek, M., Suh, H., et al. 2023, ApJL, 943, L5, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/acae25

    2023 doi

  39. [48]

    2024, A&A, 682, A69, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347880

    Misra, D., Kovlakas, K., Fragos, T., et al. 2024, A&A, 682, A69, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202347880

    2024 doi

  40. [49]

    1984, PASJ, 36, 741

    Mitsuda, K., Inoue, H., Koyama, K., et al. 1984, PASJ, 36, 741

    1984

  41. [50]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.04541

    Nakajima, K., Ouchi, M., Isobe, Y., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2412.04541. https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.04541

    2024 arXiv

  42. [51]

    M., & Schaerer, D

    Oskinova, L. M., & Schaerer, D. 2022, A&A, 661, A67, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202142520 12

    2022 doi

  43. [52]

    2005, MNRAS, 358, 1453, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08863.x

    Ott, J., Walter, F., & Brinks, E. 2005, MNRAS, 358, 1453, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2005.08863.x

    2005

  44. [53]

    2023, ApJ, 944, 34, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca96e

    Ou, P.-S., Chen, K.-J., Chu, Y.-H., & Tsai, S.-H. 2023, ApJ, 944, 34, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aca96e

    2023 doi

  45. [54]

    C., Urquhart, R., et al

    Panurach, T., Dage, K. C., Urquhart, R., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.23335. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.23335

    2024 arXiv

  46. [55]

    R., Strohmayer, T

    Pasham, D. R., Strohmayer, T. E., & Mushotzky, R. F. 2014, Nature, 513, 74, doi: 10.1038/nature13710

    2014 doi

  47. [56]

    J., & Fabian, A

    Pinto, C., Middleton, M. J., & Fabian, A. C. 2016, Nature, 533, 64, doi: 10.1038/nature17417

    2016 doi

  48. [57]

    2020, MNRAS, 491, 3606, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2929

    Ponnada, S., Brorby, M., & Kaaret, P. 2020, MNRAS, 491, 3606, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stz2929

    2020 doi

  49. [58]

    2013, MNRAS, 432, 506, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt487

    Greiner, J. 2013, MNRAS, 432, 506, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stt487

    2013 doi

  50. [59]

    G., & Abolmasov, P

    Poutanen, J., Lipunova, G., Fabrika, S., Butkevich, A. G., & Abolmasov, P. 2007, MNRAS, 377, 1187, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11668.x

    2007

  51. [60]

    H., Tsantaki, M., Zezas, A., et al

    Prestwich, A. H., Tsantaki, M., Zezas, A., et al. 2013, ApJ, 769, 92, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/769/2/92

    2013 doi

  52. [61]

    2024, MNRAS, 531, 3770, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1413 Reyero Serantes, S., Oskinova, L., Hamann, W

    Rantala, A., Naab, T., & Lah´ en, N. 2024, MNRAS, 531, 3770, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stae1413 Reyero Serantes, S., Oskinova, L., Hamann, W. R., et al. 2024, A&A, 690, A347, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202451324

    2024 doi

  53. [62]

    P., Walton, D

    Roberts, T. P., Walton, D. J., Mackenzie, A. D. A., Heida, M., & Scaringi, S. 2023, MNRAS, 525, 3330, doi: 10.1093/mnras/stad2367 Rodr ´ ıguez Castillo, G. A., Israel, G. L., Belfiore, A., et al. 2020, ApJ, 895, 60, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab8a44 S´ anchez Almeida, J., Mu˜ noz-...

    2023 doi

  54. [63]

    G., & M´ endez-Abreu, J

    Elmegreen, B. G., & M´ endez-Abreu, J. 2013, ApJ, 767, 74, doi: 10.1088/0004-637X/767/1/74

    2013 doi

  55. [64]

    2017, ApJ, 836, 183, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/836/2/183

    Fischer, J. 2017, ApJ, 836, 183, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/836/2/183

    2017 doi

  56. [65]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.21401

    Sgalletta, C., Mapelli, M., Boco, L., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.21401. https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.21401

    2024 arXiv

  57. [66]

    I., & Sunyaev, R

    Shakura, N. I., & Sunyaev, R. A. 1973, A&A, 24, 337

    1973

  58. [67]

    1995, ApJ, 445, 780, doi: 10.1086/175740

    Shimura, T., & Takahara, F. 1995, ApJ, 445, 780, doi: 10.1086/175740

    1995 doi

  59. [68]

    W., R¨ ottgering, H

    Shimwell, T. W., R¨ ottgering, H. J. A., Best, P. N., et al. 2017, A&A, 598, A104, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201629313

    2017 doi

  60. [69]

    2012, MNRAS, 421, 1043, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20439.x

    Shirazi, M., & Brinchmann, J. 2012, MNRAS, 421, 1043, doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20439.x

    2012

  61. [70]

    2021, A&A, 656, A127, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141856

    Simmonds, C., Schaerer, D., & Verhamme, A. 2021, A&A, 656, A127, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202141856

    2021 doi

  62. [71]

    S., & G¨ o˘ g¨ u¸ s, E

    Sonbas, E., Dhuga, K. S., & G¨ o˘ g¨ u¸ s, E. 2019, ApJL, 873, L12, doi: 10.3847/2041-8213/ab0a75

    2019 doi

  63. [72]

    R., & Eldridge, J

    Stanway, E. R., & Eldridge, J. J. 2019, A&A, 621, A105, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/201834359

    2019 doi

  64. [73]

    Tsai, S.-H., Chen, K.-J., Whalen, D., Ou, P.-S., & Woods, T. E. 2023, ApJ, 951, 84, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/acd936

    2023 doi

  65. [74]

    2009, Ap&SS, 324, 271, doi: 10.1007/s10509-009-0134-3

    Vanbeveren, D., Belkus, H., Van Bever, J., & Mennekens, N. 2009, Ap&SS, 324, 271, doi: 10.1007/s10509-009-0134-3

    2009 doi

  66. [75]

    C., Schleicher, D

    Vergara, M. C., Schleicher, D. R. G., Escala, A., et al. 2024, A&A, 689, A34, doi: 10.1051/0004-6361/202449967

    2024 doi

  67. [76]

    Wang, Q. D. 2002, MNRAS, 332, 764, doi: 10.1046/j.1365-8711.2002.05317.x —. 2004, ApJ, 612, 159, doi: 10.1086/422553

    2002

  68. [77]

    1999, PASJ, 51, 725, doi: 10.1093/pasj/51.5.725

    Watarai, K.-y., & Fukue, J. 1999, PASJ, 51, 725, doi: 10.1093/pasj/51.5.725

    1999 doi

  69. [78]

    2000, PASJ, 52, 133, doi: 10.1093/pasj/52.1.133

    Watarai, K.-y., Fukue, J., Takeuchi, M., & Mineshige, S. 2000, PASJ, 52, 133, doi: 10.1093/pasj/52.1.133

    2000 doi

  70. [79]

    2017, ApJ, 846, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa821d

    Belczynski, K. 2017, ApJ, 846, 17, doi: 10.3847/1538-4357/aa821d

    2017 doi

  71. [80]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.13107, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2405.13107

    Matsumoto, H. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2405.13107, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2405.13107

    2024 doi arXiv

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.