Pith. sign in

REVIEW 3 major objections 5 minor 3 cited by

Disk reflection and energetics from the accreting millisecond pulsar SRGA J144459.2-604207

T0 review · 3 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-08 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read This paper reports the first detection of a relativistically broadened iron line in the accreting millisecond pulsar SRGA J144459.2−604207, with a preferred reflection fit placing the inner accretion disk at 6 gravitational radii and…

desk verdict A competent, honest spectral analysis whose headline geometry is an overstatement: the 6 Rg inner radius is a pegged model boundary, not a free measurement. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.08239 v2 pith:EJBTYPXS submitted 2025-02-12 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.SR

Christian Malacaria , Alessandro Papitto , Sergio Campana , Alessandro Di Marco , Tiziana Di Salvo , Maria Cristina Baglio , Giulia Illiano , Riccardo La Placa
show 6 more authors
Arianna Miraval Zanon Maura Pilia Juri Poutanen Tuomo Salmi Andrea Sanna Manoj Mandal
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.SR
keywords accretingmillisecondpulsarsX-rayreflectionspectroscopyrelativisticironlineaccretiondiskinnerradiustype-IburstsultrafastoutflowSRGAJ144459.2-604207
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

The paper analyzes simultaneous X-ray spectra of the recently discovered accreting millisecond pulsar SRGA J144459.2−604207, observed during its 2024 outburst, to measure how close the accretion disk comes to the neutron star and to characterize the source's type-I X-ray bursts. It reports a broadened iron emission line whose asymmetric profile is the signature of relativistic blurring in an accretion disk, detected here for the first time in this source. With a physical reflection model, the preferred fit places the inner disk edge at 6 gravitational radii, viewed at an inclination of 53 degrees, with moderate ionization and low iron abundance. The same spectra show an absorption edge at about 9.7 keV, which the authors interpret as a blueshifted Fe XXVI edge from an outflow moving at roughly 4 percent of light speed, while noting the tension with the low ionization state. The burst analysis finds no photospheric radius expansion and a recurrence-time versus count-rate slope that is shallower than earlier measurements, with a predicted recurrence time about three times shorter than observed.

What carries the argument

The central machinery is the relativistically blurred reflection model built from the reflection convolution model and the relativistic blurring kernel, together with the diskline profile used for the iron line. These components apply Doppler shifts and gravitational redshifts to line photons emitted from a rotating disk, so the shape of the iron line carries the disk's inner radius, emissivity index, and inclination. In this paper the decisive move is a parameter freeze: the iron-line inclination is set to the 53-degree value returned by the reflection fit, which places the line at 6.41 keV and drives the inner radius to the model limit of 6 $R_g$; leaving the inclination free instead gives 85 degrees and 10 $R_g$. The edge at 9.68 keV is modeled as a simple absorption edge, and its offset from the laboratory Fe XXVI energy is the basis for the claimed $0.04c$ outflow.

What would settle it

Re-fit the same spectra with the inclination left free and the iron line energy constrained to the 6.4–6.97 keV K-$\alpha$ band, or obtain a microcalorimeter spectrum that resolves the line profile; if the best fit then requires $R_{\rm in}>6\,R_g$ or fails to reproduce the observed line shape, the paper's central 6-$R_g$ claim is falsified.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

On the paper's own terms, the discovery is that SRGA J1444's persistent emission contains a relativistically broadened iron K$\alpha$ line, and that a blurred reflection fit describes the full 0.5–50 keV spectrum with the disk inner radius at the lower boundary of the model, $R_{\rm in}=6\,R_g$, an inclination of $52.7^{+1.9}_{-1.6}$ degrees, ionization parameter $\log\xi=2.31^{+0.05}_{-0.03}$, and iron abundance $0.16\pm0.01$ times solar. The fit improves from $\chi^2/{\rm d.o.f.}=1735/724$ without the line to $881/719$ with the full reflection model. The spectra also show an absorption edge at $9.68$ keV, which the authors cautiously identify with a blueshifted Fe XXVI K-edge at about $0.04c$, while acknowledging that the low ionization state creates a tension with that identification. The burst analysis yields a peak blackbody temperature near 2.7 keV, no photospheric radius expansion, and a recurrence-time versus count-rate slope $\beta\simeq0.5$; using the measured burst fluence and $\alpha\simeq76$, the inferred mean hydrogen fraction $\bar{X}\simeq0.29$ leads to an expected recurrence time about a factor of three below the observed 2.4 hours.

Load-bearing premise

The claim that the disk reaches 6 gravitational radii rests on the assumption that the reflection-model inclination of 53 degrees is the true geometry and that the iron line sits at the model's innermost allowed radius.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • If the 6-$R_g$ inner radius is correct, SRGA J1444's disk is truncated extremely close to the neutron star surface, making the source a useful target for equation-of-state and strong-gravity tests.
  • The broadened iron line establishes SRGA J1444 as a new member of the small class of accreting millisecond pulsars whose inner disks can be mapped by relativistic reflection.
  • If the 9.68 keV edge is confirmed as a blueshifted Fe XXVI edge, SRGA J1444 would join the accreting millisecond pulsars with ultrafast outflows, implying that material is being ejected at roughly 4 percent of light speed.
  • The burst energetics imply a hydrogen-poor fuel, and the factor-of-three mismatch between expected and observed recurrence time points either to a helium-rich environment, beamed persistent emission, or an unusually massive neutron star.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • The paper's two preferred geometries (53 degrees with 6 $R_g$ versus 85 degrees with 10 $R_g$) could be tested against the independent polarization inclination of roughly 74 degrees; a joint fit using that as a prior would decide whether the 6-$R_g$ inner edge survives or is a freeze artifact.
  • If the true inclination is high, the implied magnetospheric truncation radius would be larger, and SRGA J1444 would be a less extreme disk-truncation case; the paper's qualitative disk-warp idea could be checked by comparing phase-resolved polarization angles with line-profile predictions.
  • The low iron abundance and the possible Fe XXVI edge can coexist if the reflecting disk and the outflow are in different ionization states, which predicts that the 9.7 keV edge should respond to changes in the Comptonized continuum or vanish in lower-flux states.
  • The factor-of-three recurrence-time shortfall could be sharpened into a mass constraint: if the donor composition is pinned down by future optical spectroscopy, the remaining discrepancy would constrain the neutron star mass through the gravitational-redshift term in the recurrence-time formula.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

3 major / 5 minor

Summary. The paper presents XMM-Newton and NuSTAR spectral analysis of the persistent emission and type-I bursts of the accreting millisecond pulsar SRGA J144459.2-604207. The authors fit the broadband spectrum with a semi-phenomenological continuum model and a physical reflection model, claiming detection of a relativistically broadened iron K-alpha line. They infer a disk inner radius of about 6 gravitational radii and inclination of about 53 degrees, a moderate ionization parameter log xi ~ 2.3, and an absorption edge at 9.68 keV which they suggest is an Fe XXVI edge blueshifted by an ultrafast outflow at ~0.04c. For the bursts, they find no photospheric radius expansion, a burst recurrence time dependence on count rate with a power-law index beta ~ 0.5, and a factor ~3 discrepancy between observed and expected recurrence times, which they discuss in terms of fuel composition and high neutron star mass.

Significance. The paper provides a detailed, high-quality spectral analysis of a newly discovered accreting millisecond pulsar, with a plausible detection of a broad iron line supported by a large improvement in fit statistic (Delta chi2 ~ 406 for the diskline model; F-test probability ~10^-63 for the reflection component). The time-resolved burst analysis is a contribution to the sample of AMSP burst properties. However, the headline geometric claims (6 Rg inner radius, 53 deg inclination) are not free measurements: the 6 Rg value is a model boundary obtained after fixing the inclination, and the free-fit inclination of 85 deg is in better agreement with the independent IXPE polarization measurement of 74 deg. The claimed ultrafast outflow at 9.68 keV is internally inconsistent with the best-fit ionization parameter. These issues materially weaken the abstract's conclusions, though they are fixable by reframing the results as degenerate and tentative.

major comments (3)
  1. [Abstract; §3.1; Table 1] The abstract's claim that the accretion disk 'extends down to 6 gravitational radii' is not supported as a free measurement. In the diskline fit of Sect. 3.1, freeing all line parameters yields Rin = 10.0(+1.2/-1.7) Rg and i = 85(+5/-14) deg, with line energy 6.2 keV; only after freezing i to the reflection-model value of 53 deg does the fit return Rin = 6.0(+0.3) Rg, with the lower uncertainty pegged to the model limit. In the reflection model of Sect. 3.2 (Table 1), Rin is again at the lower boundary (6.0(+1.6) Rg). The quoted 6 Rg is therefore an upper limit on the inner disk edge, not a measured truncation radius, and it is degenerate with the assumed inclination. The alternative solution at Rin = 10 Rg and i = 85 deg agrees with the IXPE polarization measurement of 74(+6/-6) deg (Papitto et al. 2025). The central geometric claims in the abstract and Sect. 5.1 should be reframed as a degenerate set of solutions, with the 6 Rg value explicitly labeled as an upper limit for a fixed inclination.
  2. [§5.2; Table 1] The 9.68 keV absorption edge is interpreted as an Fe XXVI edge in a ~0.04c ultrafast outflow, but this is internally inconsistent with the best-fit log xi = 2.31 from the same reflection model (Table 1). The paper itself acknowledges this ('clashes with the very interpretation of a fully ionized iron state'), and the claimed remedy (sub-solar iron with solar other elements) is speculative. Moreover, the edge depth is small (tau = 0.014), and the alternative Zn-edge identification is dismissed without a quantitative abundance argument. The abstract's inclusion of the outflow as a firm result should be downgraded to a tentative interpretation, with a concrete test of the two scenarios (e.g., fitting with a self-consistent photoionized absorption model rather than a multiplicative edge).
  3. [Abstract vs. §4 and §5.3] The abstract states that the burst recurrence time depends on the count rate with 'the steepest slope ever observed in these systems,' but Section 4 finds beta = 0.5 from Eq. (1), which is shallower than the typical beta ~ 1 and shallower than the previous determinations for this source (0.8-1.0) quoted in the same section. The discussion in Sect. 5.3 correctly describes the dependence as 'milder.' The abstract and the body are contradictory and must be reconciled before acceptance.
minor comments (5)
  1. [Table 1] The reflection fraction is given as -0.73(+0.17/-0.10); since a negative reflection fraction has no simple interpretation as a ratio of reflected to incident flux, the model definition and physical meaning should be stated explicitly.
  2. [Table 1; §3.1] Table 1 reports Rin = 6.0(+1.6) with no lower error; the text explains that the lower value is pegged, but a note in the table would help avoid misinterpretation.
  3. [§3.1] The improvement in chi2 for the diskline component (from 1735/724 to 1329/722) is quoted without a quantitative significance estimate; an F-test probability, as given for the reflection component in Sect. 3.2, would make the detection claim easier to evaluate.
  4. [§5.1] The qualitative suggestion that the inner disk is more inclined than the outer disk is not modeled; given the known degeneracy between inclination and inner radius, a comment on whether such a geometry would produce the observed line profile would strengthen the argument.
  5. [§4; Fig. 6] The fit to the recurrence time relation is reported without quoting chi2 values for the free-beta and fixed-beta fits shown in Fig. 6; adding these values would clarify whether the new beta = 0.5 is statistically preferred.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No circular derivation: the broad iron line and reflection component are data-driven, and the 6 Rg / 53 deg geometry, while model-dependent and pegged at a boundary, is not an input recycled as a prediction.

full rationale

The paper's central result, the presence of a relativistically broadened iron line, is established from spectral residuals that do not require the disputed geometric parameters: removing the diskline component worsens the fit from 1329/722 to 1735/724, and the F-test probability for including the rfxconv reflection component is 10^-63. The quoted geometry (Rin=6 Rg, i=53 deg) comes from fitting standard XSPEC models, not from an assumed input equal to the output. The paper explicitly reports that with all diskline parameters free the fit gives E=6.2 keV, Rin=10.0 Rg, and i=85 deg, and that the 6 Rg value arises only after freezing inclination to the reflection-model value, with the lower error 'pegged to the model limit of 6 Rg'; the reflection model itself also returns Rin at that same boundary. This is a genuine model degeneracy and boundary effect that weakens the physical interpretation, and the authors acknowledge it ('the observed discrepancy is rather due to the model-driven dependence of the two parameters'), but it is not a circular reduction: the line detection and the reflection continuum are independently constrained by the data. The burst fuel-composition estimate (Xbar=0.29) is obtained from the observed alpha via standard analytic formulae and then compared with recurrence-time expectations, rather than used as their input. Self-citations such as Papitto et al. 2025 for IXPE polarization supply external measurements or standard model references and are not load-bearing in a circular sense.

Assumptions & free parameters 7 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 1 invented entities

The paper's conclusions are built on standard XSPEC models (tbabs, nthComp, bbodyrad, diskbb, rfxconv, rdblur, diskline) whose validity is taken from the literature rather than demonstrated here. A source distance of 8 kpc, a 1.4 solar mass neutron star, and Wilms solar abundances are assumed without re-derivation. The most consequential assumption is the choice to freeze the diskline inclination to the reflection-model value of 53 degrees; this choice, not the data alone, produces the 6 Rg inner radius.

free parameters (7)
  • Disk inclination (reflection model) = 52.7 (+1.9/-1.6) deg
    From rfxconv+rdblur reflection fit; also used as a frozen input for the diskline iron line fit (Sect. 3.1), driving the Rin = 6 Rg result.
  • Inner disk radius Rin = 6.0 (+0.3/-0.0) Rg
    Pegged at the model lower limit in the diskline fit after freezing inclination; the abstract reports it as a measured value but it is a lower limit.
  • Iron abundance = 0.16 (+0.01/-0.01) solar
    Best-fit from the rfxconv reflection model; unusually sub-solar despite a prominent iron line, and retained after excluding the iron band.
  • Ionization parameter log xi = 2.31 (+0.05/-0.03)
    Moderate ionization from the reflection fit; in tension with the Fe XXVI edge interpretation.
  • Absorption edge at 9.68 keV = 9.68 +/- 0.13 keV, tau = 0.014
    Fitted edge interpreted as blueshifted Fe XXVI (0.04c outflow) or as a Zn edge; the choice between these is not uniquely determined by the fit.
  • Burst recurrence power-law index beta = ~0.5
    Power-law index in Delta t = K C^-beta fitted to XMM count rates; the abstract calls it the steepest ever observed while the body calls it milder than the typical beta ~ 1.
  • Cross-normalization constant XMM/NuSTAR = ~1.16
    Ad hoc constant to mitigate calibration differences between EPIC-pn and NuSTAR FPMs; not a physical parameter.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption Wilms et al. (2000) solar abundances (wilm) describe interstellar absorption
    Used in tbabs; affects the continuum shape and derived column density NH = 1.92e22 cm^-2.
  • domain assumption nthComp thermal Comptonization accurately describes the corona
    Sect. 3.1; the dominant continuum component with photon index 2.39 and kTe ~ 18 keV.
  • domain assumption rfxconv reflection model with rdblur relativistic blurring describes the disk reflection
    Sect. 3.2; used to infer Rin, inclination, iron abundance, and log xi.
  • domain assumption Source distance of 8 kpc (from Molkov et al. 2024) assumed for luminosity and radius estimates
    Sect. 4: burst peak luminosity 9.3e37 erg/s and blackbody radius 5-7.5 km assume d = 8 kpc.
  • domain assumption Neutron star mass 1.4 Msun and radius 11.2 km, giving gravitational redshift z = 0.259
    Sect. 5.3: Qgrav ~ 190 MeV/nucleon and the expected recurrence time 2765 s rest on these values.
  • standard math Galloway et al. (2022) empirical relation between alpha and fuel composition Xbar
    Eq. (4) used to derive Xbar = 0.29(3); the rendered equation is garbled and does not transparently reproduce the quoted value.
invented entities (1)
  • Ultrafast outflow (v ~ 0.04c)
    purpose: Explains the 9.68 keV absorption edge as a blueshifted Fe XXVI K edge
    The alternative Zn edge remains viable; the outflow conflicts with the low ionization parameter log xi = 2.31 derived from the same reflection model, and no independent detection is presented.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Disk reflection and energetics from the accreting millisecond pulsar SRGA J144459.2-604207." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/EJBTYPXS

@misc{pith2026250208239,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Disk reflection and energetics from the accreting millisecond pulsar SRGA J144459.2-604207},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/EJBTYPXS}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.08239}
}
abstract

Accreting millisecond pulsars (AMSPs) are excellent laboratories to study reflection spectra and their features from an accretion disk truncated by a rapidly rotating magnetosphere near the neutron star surface. These systems also exhibit thermonuclear (type-I) bursts that can provide insights on the accretion physics and fuel composition. We explore spectral properties of the AMSP SRGA J144459 observed during the outburst that recently led to its discovery in February 2024. We aim to characterize the spectral shape of the persistent emission and to analyze type-I bursts properties employing XMM + NuSTAR overlapping observations taken during the most recent outburst. We perform spectral analysis of the time-averaged persistent (i.e., non-bursting) emission. For this, we first employ a semi-phenomenological continuum model made of a dominant thermal Comptonization plus two thermal contributions. A separate fit has also been performed employing a physical reflection model. We also perform time-resolved spectral analysis of a type-I burst employing a blackbody model. We observe a broadened iron emission line, thus suggesting relativistic effects, supported by the physical model accounting for relativistically blurred reflection. The resulting accretion disk extends down to 6 gravitational radii, inclined at ~$53^{\circ}$, and only moderately ionized (log$\xi\simeq2.3$). We observe an absorption edge at ~9.7 keV that can be interpreted as an Fe XXVI edge blueshifted by an ultrafast ($\simeq0.04$c) outflow. Our broadband observations of type-I bursts do not find evidence of photospheric radius expansion. The burst recurrence time shows a dependence on the count rate with the steepest slope ever observed in these systems. We also observe a discrepancy of ~3 between the observed and expected burst recurrence time, which we discuss in the framework of fuel composition and high NS mass scenarios.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.08239 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Unfolded average spectrum (0.5–50 keV) of the persis￾tent emission from SRGA J1444. Top panel: merged XMM￾Newton RGS (blue points), EPIC-pn (green points) and NuS￾TAR FPMA and FPMB (black and red points, respectively) are shown as fitted to the semi-phenomenological best-fit model constant*tbabs(bbodyrad + diskbb + nthComp + gauSi+ gauAu+ disklineAr + disklineFe)*edge*edge*edge (see Sect 3.1). Bottom panel: residual… view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Similar to [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p003_2.png] view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. Residuals of the model shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_3.png] view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (3 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: Light curve of SRGA J1444 as observed by NuSTAR (bottom) and XMM-Newton PN (top) at a time binning of 10 s. Contemporaneously observed type-I bursts are marked with a red vertical dashed line and numbered in the top panel for clarity. 4. X-ray type-I bursts and time-re…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Top panel: light curve of the type-I X-ray burst number 4 (see [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Variation of the recurrence time as a function of the XMM￾Newton EPIC-pn persistent count rate. The red dashed line represents a fit of data points to Eq. (1). The blue dashed line represents the fit with β value fixed to 0.8 (see text). Sanchez-Fernandez et al. 2024a,…

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 3 Pith papers

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. Relativistic X-ray reflection and thermonuclear burst from accreting millisecond X-ray pulsar SRGA J144459.2-604207

    astro-ph.HE 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    Time-resolved X-ray spectral fits of SRGA J1444 reveal up to 30% disk reflection during thermonuclear bursts, an inner disk radius near 11 gravitational radii, and a polar magnetic field around 6e8 Gauss.

  2. Timing and spectral studies of SRGA J144459.2$-$604207 with NICER, Einstein Probe, IXPE, NuSTAR, Insight-HXMT and INTEGRAL during its 2024 outburst

    astro-ph.HE 2025-07 conditional novelty 6.0 of 10

    During its 2024 outburst the 448 Hz pulsar spun up at 3.15e-13 Hz/s until MJD 60377, then its pulse phase swung, and burst-time pulse profiles lagged persistent profiles by an amount decreasing with X-ray energy.

  3. Spectral study of the outburst decay of the accreting millisecond X-ray pulsar SRGA J144459.2-604207

    astro-ph.HE 2026-07 conditional novelty 5.0 of 10

    The 2024 outburst decay and quiescence of AMXP SRGA J144459.2-604207 are spectrally characterized, and its 45-year quiescent luminosity is found to be consistent with deep crustal heating under assumed outburst recurrences.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

53 extracted references · 45 canonical work pages · cited by 3 Pith papers

  1. [1]

    L., Schulz, N

    Allen, J. L., Schulz, N. S., Homan, J., et al. 2018, ApJ, 861, 26

    2018

  2. [2]

    Arnaud, K. A. 1996, in ASP Conf. Ser., V ol. 101, Astronomical Data Analy- sis Software and Systems V , ed. G. H. Jacoby & J. Barnes (San Francisco: Astron. Soc. Pac.), 17

    1996

  3. [3]

    Bagnoli, T., in’t Zand, J. J. M., Galloway, D. K., & Watts, A. L. 2013, MNRAS, 431, 1947

    work page 2013

  4. [4]

    E., & Page, C

    Barr, P., White, N. E., & Page, C. G. 1985, MNRAS, 216, 65P

    work page 1985

  5. [5]

    F., Boirin, L., et al

    Barret, D., Olive, J. F., Boirin, L., et al. 2000, ApJ, 533, 329

    work page 2000

  6. [6]

    2023, A&A, 678, A99

    Bobrikova, A., Loktev, V ., Salmi, T., & Poutanen, J. 2023, A&A, 678, A99

    work page 2023

  7. [7]

    M., Miller, J

    Cackett, E. M., Miller, J. M., Ballantyne, D. R., et al. 2010, ApJ, 720, 205

    work page 2010

  8. [8]

    J., & Madau, P

    Cooke, R. J., & Madau, P. 2014, ApJ, 791, 116

    work page 2014

Show all 53 references
  1. [9]

    M., et al

    Degenaar, N., Pinto, C., Miller, J. M., et al. 2017, MNRAS, 464, 398 Di Salvo, T., & Sanna, A. 2022, in ASSL, V ol. 465, Astrophysics and Space Science Library, ed. S. Bhattacharyya, A. Papitto, & D. Bhattacharya, 87 Di Salvo, T., Sanna, A., Burderi, L., et al. 2019, MNRAS, 48...

    2017

  2. [10]

    M., Grinberg, V ., Fürst, F., et al

    Diez, C. M., Grinberg, V ., Fürst, F., et al. 2023, A&A, 674, A147

    2023

  3. [11]

    2024, PASJ, in press, arXiv:2411.10993

    Dohi, A., Nishimura, N., Hirai, R., et al. 2024, PASJ, in press, arXiv:2411.10993

    2024 arXiv

  4. [12]

    2006, MNRAS, 367, 659

    Done, C., & Gierli´nski, M. 2006, MNRAS, 367, 659

    2006

  5. [13]

    2017, ApJ, 838, 120

    Egron, E., Pellizzoni, A., Pollock, A., et al. 2017, ApJ, 838, 120

    2017

  6. [14]

    C., Rees, M

    Fabian, A. C., Rees, M. J., Stella, L., & White, N. E. 1989, MNRAS, 238, 729

    1989

  7. [15]

    2012, A&A, 545, A26 —

    Falanga, M., Kuiper, L., Poutanen, J., et al. 2012, A&A, 545, A26 —. 2011, A&A, 529, A68

    2012

  8. [16]

    K., Johnston, Z., Goodwin, A., & He, C.-C

    Galloway, D. K., Johnston, Z., Goodwin, A., & He, C.-C. 2022, ApJS, 263, 30

    2022

  9. [17]

    K., Muno, M

    Galloway, D. K., Muno, M. P., Hartman, J. M., Psaltis, D., & Chakrabarty, D. 2008, ApJS, 179, 360 García, J. A., Dauser, T., Ludlam, R., et al. 2022, ApJ, 926, 13

    2008

  10. [18]

    M., & Fabian, A

    George, I. M., & Fabian, A. C. 1991, MNRAS, 249, 352 Gierli´nski, M., Done, C., & Barret, D. 2002, MNRAS, 331, 141 Gierli´nski, M., & Poutanen, J. 2005, MNRAS, 359, 1261

    1991

  11. [19]

    1998, A&A, 338, L83

    Gilfanov, M., Revnivtsev, M., Sunyaev, R., & Churazov, E. 1998, A&A, 338, L83

    1998

  12. [20]

    J., Heger, A., & Galloway, D

    Goodwin, A. J., Heger, A., & Galloway, D. K. 2019, ApJ, 870, 64

    2019

  13. [21]

    A., Craig, W

    Harrison, F. A., Craig, W. W., Christensen, F. E., et al. 2013, ApJ, 770, 103

    2013

  14. [22]

    R., Fujii, M

    Hirai, Y ., Saitoh, T. R., Fujii, M. S., Kaneko, K., & Beers, T. C. 2025, ApJ, 980, L25

    2025

  15. [23]

    S., & Bleeker, J

    Kaastra, J. S., & Bleeker, J. A. M. 2016, A&A, 587, A151

    2016

  16. [24]

    2001, ApJ, 560, L147

    Kubota, A., Makishima, K., & Ebisawa, K. 2001, ApJ, 560, L147

    2001

  17. [25]

    R., in’t Zand, J

    Kuulkers, E., den Hartog, P. R., in’t Zand, J. J. M., et al. 2003, A&A, 399, 663

    2003

  18. [26]

    Lampe, N., Heger, A., & Galloway, D. K. 2016, ApJ, 819, 46

    2016

  19. [27]

    M., Miller, J

    Ludlam, R. M., Miller, J. M., Degenaar, N., et al. 2017, ApJ, 847, 135

    2017

  20. [28]

    1986, in Lecture Notes in Physics, V ol

    Makishima, K. 1986, in Lecture Notes in Physics, V ol. 266, The Physics of Ac- cretion onto Compact Objects, ed. K. O. Mason, M. G. Watson, & N. E. White (Berlin Heidelberg New York: Springer-Verlag), 249

    1986

  21. [29]

    Markwardt, C. B. 2003, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 115, 1

    2003

  22. [30]

    A., Semena, A

    Mereminskiy, I. A., Semena, A. N., Molkov, S. V ., et al. 2024, The Astronomer’s Telegram, 16464, 1

    2024

  23. [31]

    M., Fabian, A

    Miller, J. M., Fabian, A. C., Kaastra, J., et al. 2015, ApJ, 814, 87

    2015

  24. [32]

    M., Raymond, J., Cackett, E., Grinberg, V ., & Nowak, M

    Miller, J. M., Raymond, J., Cackett, E., Grinberg, V ., & Nowak, M. 2016, ApJ, 822, L18

    2016

  25. [33]

    V ., Lutovinov, A

    Molkov, S. V ., Lutovinov, A. A., Tsygankov, S. S., et al. 2024, A&A, 690, A353

    2024

  26. [34]

    S., Sanna, A., et al

    Ng, M., Ray, P. S., Sanna, A., et al. 2024, ApJ, 968, L7

    2024

  27. [35]

    A., Paizis, A., Jaisawal, G

    Nowak, M. A., Paizis, A., Jaisawal, G. K., et al. 2019, ApJ, 874, 69

    2019

  28. [36]

    2009, A&A, 493, L39

    Papitto, A., Di Salvo, T., D’Aì, A., et al. 2009, A&A, 493, L39

    2009

  29. [37]

    2010, MNRAS, 407, 2575

    Papitto, A., Riggio, A., di Salvo, T., et al. 2010, MNRAS, 407, 2575

    2010

  30. [38]

    2025, A&A, 694, A37

    Papitto, A., Di Marco, A., Poutanen, J., et al. 2025, A&A, 694, A37

    2025

  31. [39]

    Patruno, A., & Watts, A. L. 2021, in ASSL, V ol. 461, Timing Neutron Stars:

    2021

  32. [40]

    2021, A&A, 650, A42

    Pavlinsky, M., Tkachenko, A., Levin, V ., et al. 2021, A&A, 650, A42

    2021

  33. [41]

    2016, MNRAS, 457, 2988

    Pintore, F., Sanna, A., Di Salvo, T., et al. 2016, MNRAS, 457, 2988

    2016

  34. [42]

    2006, Advances in Space Research, 38, 2697

    Poutanen, J. 2006, Advances in Space Research, 38, 2697

    2006

  35. [43]

    N., Porquet, D., & Turner, T

    Reeves, J. N., Porquet, D., & Turner, T. J. 2004, ApJ, 615, 150

    2004

  36. [44]

    R., & Fabian, A

    Ross, R. R., & Fabian, A. C. 2007, MNRAS, 381, 1697

    2007

  37. [45]

    A., Fogantini, F

    Saavedra, E. A., Fogantini, F. A., Escobar, G. J., et al. 2023, A&A, 680, A88

    2023

  38. [46]

    2020, ApJ, 899, 127

    Snios, B., Siemiginowska, A., Sobolewska, M., et al. 2020, ApJ, 899, 127

    2020

  39. [47]

    2006, in Compact stellar X-ray sources, Cam- bridge Astrophysics Series, No

    Strohmayer, T., & Bildsten, L. 2006, in Compact stellar X-ray sources, Cam- bridge Astrophysics Series, No. 39, ed. W. Lewin & M. van der Klis (Cam- bridge: Cambridge University Press), 113

    2006

  40. [48]

    2021, A&A, 656, A132

    Sunyaev, R., Arefiev, V ., Babyshkin, V ., et al. 2021, A&A, 656, A132

    2021

  41. [49]

    2024, PASJ, in press, arXiv:2411.10992

    Takeda, T., Tamagawa, T., Enoto, T., et al. 2024, PASJ, in press, arXiv:2411.10992

    2024 arXiv

  42. [50]

    B., Tucker, W

    Tarter, C. B., Tucker, W. H., & Salpeter, E. E. 1969, ApJ, 156, 943

    1969

  43. [51]

    2000, ApJ, 542, 914

    Wilms, J., Allen, A., & McCray, R. 2000, ApJ, 542, 914

    2000

  44. [52]

    A., & De Marco, B

    Zdziarski, A. A., & De Marco, B. 2020, ApJ, 896, L36

    2020

  45. [53]

    A., Johnson, W

    Zdziarski, A. A., Johnson, W. N., & Magdziarz, P. 1996, MNRAS, 283, 193 ˙Zycki, P. T., Done, C., & Smith, D. A. 1999, MNRAS, 309, 561 Article number, page 8

    1996

Pith tools

Reviewed August 8, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.