Spin wave interactions in the pyrochlore Heisenberg antiferromagnet with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions

Himanshu Mavani; Kallol Mondal; V. Ravi Chandra; V. V. Jyothis

REVIEW 2 major objections 5 minor 41 references

Spin wave interactions in the pyrochlore Heisenberg antiferromagnet with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions

T0 review · 2 major / 5 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Spin-wave interactions can drive the pyrochlore all-in-all-out magnet unstable at weak Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya coupling.

desk verdict First interacting-magnon study of the AIAO pyrochlore with DMI: the renormalization results look solid, but the low-D instability claim rests on an incomplete 1/S diagram set. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.09594 v3 pith:OHXI7JCX submitted 2025-02-13 cond-mat.str-el

V. V. Jyothis , Kallol Mondal , Himanshu Mavani , V. Ravi Chandra This is my paper · ORCID

classification cond-mat.str-el

keywords pyrochlorelatticeall-in-all-outordermagnoninteractionsDzyaloshinskii-Moriyainteractionspinwaverenormalization1/Sexpansiondecayfrustratedantiferromagnet

verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

This paper asks whether magnon-magnon interactions alter the stability and spectra of the all-in-all-out (AIAO) phase of the nearest-neighbour pyrochlore antiferromagnet with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions. Using a 1/S expansion around the classical AIAO ground state, it computes the leading-order self-energy correction to the spin-wave bands and finds a large downward renormalization of the lowest band. For small values of the DMI strength, the renormalized frequency near the Γ point becomes negative, which the authors read as a potential instability of the AIAO phase itself. Magnetic fields along the [111], [100] and [110] directions generically push the lowest band further down, while higher bands can behave differently. The paper also maps where the two-magnon continuum touches the single-magnon bands, identifying parameter regimes where magnon decay is kinematically allowed.

What carries the argument

The argument runs through a large-S (1/S) expansion with bosonic spin operators in local frames aligned with the classical AIAO moments, a canonical diagonalization of the quadratic boson Hamiltonian to define non-interacting magnon bands, and the leading-order irreducible self-energy inserted into the interacting Green's function. This self-energy is frequency independent and Hermitian, so at this order magnon interactions shift the bands rather than broaden them, and the sign of the renormalized pole energies becomes the stability criterion. The same non-interacting bands feed the two-magnon continuum and the kinematic condition for spontaneous magnon decay.

What would settle it

A calculation of the magnon self-energy beyond first order in 1/S, or a non-perturbative treatment near Γ, that keeps the renormalized lowest band positive across the whole Brillouin zone for D ≲ 0.1J would show that the claimed instability is an artifact of the truncation.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that spin-wave interactions, treated at first order in nonlinear spin-wave theory, produce a large renormalization of the magnon spectra of the AIAO pyrochlore antiferromagnet, and that this renormalization can turn the phase unstable: for low DMI strengths the renormalized lowest band dips to negative energies near the Γ point, signalling that the AIAO order is not protected by interactions. The instability is more pronounced for S=1/2 than for S=1, and for a fixed DMI strength the lowest band is driven further down as the magnetic field strength increases, even though the field opposes the interaction correction to the total ground-state energy. Where the lowest band survives, it does not satisfy the kinematic condition for two-magnon decay; the higher bands do in parts of the D–B parameter space. The authors present these as leading-order results, noting that singular features near Γ and near small-gap degeneracies likely mark the limits of the perturbative evaluation.

Load-bearing premise

The whole instability claim rests on trusting the first-order perturbative calculation at the very wave vectors where that calculation itself breaks down, so the negative frequencies could be an artifact.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

The AIAO phase is substantially softened by magnon interactions; at small DMI the renormalized lowest band goes negative near Γ, implying the phase can be destabilized by interactions alone.
Spin-1/2 AIAO systems are more fragile than spin-1: the negative-frequency instability persists to larger DMI strengths for S=1/2.
At fixed DMI, increasing a magnetic field along [111], [100], or [110] pushes the renormalized lowest band down, so fields that stabilize the classical configuration can nevertheless enhance the tendency toward instability.
The lowest magnon band is kinematically protected from two-magnon decay in the studied parameter range, while the higher bands enter decay-allowed regions for a range of D and field strength; the resulting excitations would be sharp in the first case and damped in the second.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

If the near-Γ negative renormalization is physical rather than an artefact of the truncation, the classical DMI-driven selection of AIAO order is not enough; the phase diagram of pyrochlore antiferromagnets at small D would need a quantum-interaction correction.
The predicted decay-allowed regions for the upper bands imply that inelastic neutron scattering on AIAO pyrochlores at those fields and DMI strengths should show broadened, asymmetric high-energy magnon peaks; seeing that would corroborate the paper's kinematic analysis.
The same 1/S machinery should be applied to the competing non-collinear phases (such as canted and splayed orders) that become relevant in a field; the near-degenerate manifold that amplifies interaction effects here is likely to amplify them there too.

Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Desk Editor's Note

read the letter

Two things to know. This is the first interacting-magnon calculation for the all-in-all-out (AIAO) phase of the pyrochlore Heisenberg antiferromagnet with DMI, and it reports large one-loop renormalizations of the spin wave bands plus a possible low-D instability. The calculation is standard but carefully done. The renormalization trend—significant softening of the lowest band, growing with field, shrinking with DMI—is probably robust. The instability claim is not, not yet.

What's good. The authors use Holstein-Primakoff bosons, diagonalize the quadratic part, keep cubic and quartic terms, and compute the first-order (in the interaction) self-energy. They are honest about the singularities near Gamma and in small-gap regions, and they attribute them to perturbation theory breaking down. They also provide ground-state energy corrections and a clean diagnostic for two-magnon decay; Fig. 6 is a useful map of where decay is kinematically allowed.

The soft spot is the central one. In a consistent 1/S expansion, the single-particle self-energy at order S^0 contains two contributions: the first-order quartic (frequency-independent) diagram they compute, and the second-order bubble built from cubic vertices. Both are the same order. They compute only the quartic one. The cubic vertices are used only to check the decay condition, not for their real-part feedback on the energies. Since the cubic couplings grow as D goes to zero (the LSWT spectrum approaches the degenerate manifold), the omitted bubble is likely large exactly where they report negative renormalized frequencies near Gamma. So the "potential instability" is, at present, a property of a truncated diagram set. That does not kill the paper—the significant renormalization at moderate D is still a valid and useful result—but the headline claim needs either the missing bubble calculation or a non-perturbative check (e.g., self-consistent Born approximation or small-cluster exact diagonalization).

Minor points: the finite-size convergence is asserted, not shown; a plot of the self-energy versus N would help. The tiny symmetry-breaking field is a reasonable regularization, but its effect on the negative-frequency region should be checked.

Who this is for: people working on pyrochlore magnons, topological magnon bands, and the AIAO phase in iridates and stannates. It deserves a serious referee: the topic is timely, the formalism is sound, and the renormalization results are likely to be cited even if the instability is ultimately resolved differently. I would recommend peer review, with a request that the authors either include the cubic-bubble contribution or soften the instability claim accordingly.

Referee Report

2 major / 5 minor

Summary. This paper studies the effect of magnon-magnon interactions on the spin wave spectra of the all-in-all-out (AIAO) phase of the nearest-neighbour pyrochlore Heisenberg antiferromagnet with a Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction (DMI). Using a Holstein-Primakoff boson representation and a 1/S expansion, the authors compute the first-order (in the quartic interaction) self-energy and obtain renormalized magnon spectra for zero and finite magnetic fields along [111], [100], and [110]. They report large spectral renormalization for typical DMI strengths and argue that for small D the renormalized lowest band becomes negative near the Γ point, indicating a potential instability of the AIAO phase. They also evaluate the two-magnon continuum and kinematic conditions for magnon decay. The paper is self-contained in its formalism, uses finite-size checks, and provides a systematic presentation of spectra for a range of D and field strengths.

Significance. If correct, the main claim—that magnon interactions can destabilize the AIAO phase at small DMI—would be a notable result, since the AIAO phase is the canonical ordered state of pyrochlore antiferromagnets and is usually described by linear spin wave theory. The paper also provides a useful formalism for computing renormalized spectra and decay conditions in this non-collinear frustrated magnet, and the ground-state energy comparisons in Fig. 5 are a helpful global diagnostic. The calculation is parameter-free apart from the model couplings and a small symmetry-breaking field, and the numerical implementation appears careful, with finite-size checks. However, the central instability claim is currently not fully supported, because the self-energy is computed only from the quartic first-order diagrams while the same-order 1/S bubble diagram from the cubic vertices is omitted, and because the negative frequencies appear in the very region where the authors themselves state that the perturbative evaluation is unreliable.

major comments (2)

[Sec. III, Eq. (5)] The instability claim for small D, signalled by negative renormalized frequencies near Γ, is computed from the first-order, frequency-independent self-energy generated by the quartic vertices in Eq. (5). In a consistent 1/S expansion, however, the single-particle self-energy at order S^0 also receives a second-order bubble contribution from the cubic vertices in Eq. (5): each cubic vertex is proportional to √S, so the bubble is of order S^0, the same order as the quartic first-order self-energy. The manuscript uses the cubic vertices only to check the kinematic condition in Eq. (11), not to compute the real part of this bubble. Because the cubic vertices are enhanced when D is small (the LSWT spectrum approaches the degenerate manifold), the omitted bubble can be large or singular exactly in the region where the negative renormalization is reported. The authors' own statement in Sec. III that the perturbative evaluation is 'beyond the limits of its applicability' near Γ and small gaps strengthens, rather than removes, the need to include this contribution. As written, the 'potential instability' is a property of a truncated diagram set, not of the full leading-order 1/S theory. The authors should either include the bubble or explicitly reframe the claim as applying only to the truncated diagram set.
[Sec. III, paragraph on singularities] The negative renormalized frequencies near Γ, which are the basis for the claimed instability, appear in the same region where the authors state that the perturbative evaluation is unreliable: they write that the discontinuities and singularities near Γ and small-gap regions 'are the results of using the perturbative evaluation of the self energy beyond the limits of its applicability.' No controlled test is provided for the specific negative-frequency region (e.g., convergence with respect to the tiny symmetry-breaking field, lattice size, or D). Without such a test, the report of a 'potential instability of the phase itself' in the abstract and Sec. V is not supported by the calculation as it stands. The authors should either demonstrate that the negative frequencies persist after including the missing bubble and after a controlled treatment of the small-gap region, or downgrade the claim to a tentative indication within the limitations of the truncated perturbation theory.

minor comments (5)

[Eq. (5)] The notation in Eq. (5) is incomplete: several cubic and quartic terms are represented by ellipses, and the tilde couplings are not defined in the text but only by reference to an earlier work. A self-contained definition, or at least a clear statement of which terms are retained, would greatly improve readability.
[Sec. III, paragraph on the tiny magnetic field] The small symmetry-breaking field of 0.005J used to enable band labels is not a pure regularization; it modifies the Hamiltonian and the LSWT spectra. The authors should quantify its effect on the renormalized spectra, especially near Γ, where the reported negative frequencies occur.
[Sec. III.A, Eq. (10)] The ground-state energy estimate in Eq. (10) uses renormalized energies that can become negative in the instability region; the physical interpretation of E_NLSWT_GS in that regime should be discussed, since replacing a magnon energy by a negative value in the sum may not be meaningful.
[Sec. IV, Eq. (12)] The decay diagnostic in Eq. (12) is based on non-interacting (LSWT) energies. Given the large renormalization reported in Sec. III, the authors should comment on how the decay thresholds would be modified by the renormalized spectra, or state explicitly why the LSWT condition is sufficient for the qualitative conclusions.
[Abstract and Sec. V] The abstract and Sec. V state the instability as a definite possibility ('the stability of the phase can be jeopardized'), while Sec. III contains substantial caveats about the breakdown of perturbation theory in exactly the region where the instability is reported. The phrasing should be softened to reflect these caveats, for example by specifying 'within the first-order quartic self-energy calculation.'

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the paper is a self-contained perturbative calculation with no fitted parameters and no load-bearing self-citation.

full rationale

The paper starts from the model Hamiltonian in Eq. (1) and performs a Holstein-Primakoff expansion to obtain the linear spin-wave Hamiltonian and the leading interaction terms in Eq. (3)-(5), after which the renormalized spectra are obtained from the Dyson equation, Eq. (8), using the first-order irreducible self-energy. No parameter is fitted to any external data, and the renormalized energies are computed from the model couplings rather than matched to a target. The tiny field B=0.005J is explicitly introduced only to break exact band degeneracies and enable unambiguous band labels, so it is a regularization, not a fitted input. The only self-citation, Ref. [29], is used for conventions of local axes and coefficient expressions; this is not load-bearing for the central results, which are derived from the stated Hamiltonian. The negative renormalized frequencies near Gamma are a computed consequence of the retained self-energy terms for the quoted parameters, not an assumption dressed as a prediction. Concerns about an omitted same-order bubble diagram, or about the reliability of perturbation theory near degeneracies, are questions of correctness or convergence and are not circularity. No step reduces, by construction or by self-citation, to its own input.

Assumptions & free parameters 1 free parameters · 3 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central calculation depends only on the model parameters J,D,B,S and standard many-body techniques. The only ad hoc numerical choice is the tiny symmetry-breaking field, which regularizes the degenerate B=0 spectrum. No new particles or entities are introduced.

free parameters (1)

symmetry breaking magnetic field = B = 0.005J
Ad hoc tiny field introduced to lift band degeneracy at B=0 and permit unambiguous band labels in the non-interacting Green's function; all zero-field results are actually at B=0.005J.

assumptions (3)

standard math Standard Holstein-Primakoff boson expansion and truncation of the spin Hamiltonian to quadratic, cubic, and quartic terms (the latter two constituting Hint)
The HP transformation maps spins to bosons; the paper keeps the leading interaction terms as shown in Eqs. 3-5. This is a standard 1/S expansion.
domain assumption Validity of first-order perturbation theory in the self-energy
The renormalized spectra are obtained from the first-order irreducible self-energy; this assumes that higher-order terms are small, which the paper itself questions near Brillouin zone degeneracies.
domain assumption Classical ground state is the all-in-all-out state, canted by the magnetic field, for the studied D and B ranges
For D>0, the DMI selects AIAO as the classical ground state; in a magnetic field the classical state is obtained by numerical optimization, and the paper assumes no field-induced phase transition up to B=3J.

how reviews work

0 comments

Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Spin wave interactions in the pyrochlore Heisenberg antiferromagnet with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/OHXI7JCX

@misc{pith2026250209594,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Spin wave interactions in the pyrochlore Heisenberg antiferromagnet with Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/OHXI7JCX}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.09594}
}

abstract

We study the effect of magnon interactions on the spin wave spectra of the all-in-all-out phase of the pyrochlore nearest neighbour antiferromagnet with a Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction ($D$). The leading order corrections to spin wave energies indicate a significant renormalisation for commonly encountered strengths of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya term. For low values of $D$ we find a potential instability of the phase itself, indicated by the renormalisation of magnon frequencies to negative values. We have also studied the renormalized spectra in the presence of magnetic fields along three high symmetry directions of the lattice, namely the $[111]$, $[100]$ and $[110]$ directions. Generically, we find that for a fixed value of the Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction renormalized spectra for the lowest band decrease with an increasing strength of the field. We have also analyzed the limits of the two magnon continuum and probed the possibility of magnon decay. For a range of $D$ and the field strength we identify possible parameter regimes where the decay of the higher bands of the system are kinematically allowed.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.09594 by the authors.

**Figure 2.** (A) shows the magnonic band structure of the Hamiltonian for a vanishingly small magnetic field for D = 0.3J. We recall that an evaluation of the magnon bands of the all-in-all-out state in the absence of the DMI results in two sets of doubly degenerate bands, one flat band at zero energy and another dispersive [40]. The DMI results in a gap as can be seen in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_2.png] view at source ↗

**Figure 3.** depicts representative data showing the effects of a magnetic field. The top row depicts the LSWT spectra for D = 0.3J, and, B = 2.0J, for B ∥ [111], [100], [110] respectively. The bottom row depicts for various values of the strength of the DMI the renormalized spectra for the lowest band. A comparison between the plots in the bottom row and those of [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p005_3.png] view at source ↗

Figures from the paper (3 more)

**Figure 4.** Figure 4: FIG. 4 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p006_4.png]

**Figure 5.** Figure 5: FIG. 5 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p007_5.png]

**Figure 6.** Figure 6: FIG. 6 [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p008_6.png]

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

41 extracted references · 30 canonical work pages

[1]

Bloch, Zur Theorie des Ferromagnetismus, Zeitschrift fur Physik 61, 206 (1930)

F. Bloch, Zur Theorie des Ferromagnetismus, Zeitschrift fur Physik 61, 206 (1930)

work page 1930
[2]

P. W. Anderson, An approximate quantum theory of the antiferromagnetic ground state, Phys. Rev. 86, 694 9 (1952)

work page 1952
[3]

Kubo, The spin-wave theory of antiferromagnetics, Phys

R. Kubo, The spin-wave theory of antiferromagnetics, Phys. Rev. 87, 568 (1952)

work page 1952
[4]

F. J. Dyson, General theory of spin-wave interactions, Phys. Rev. 102, 1217 (1956)

work page 1956
[5]

F. J. Dyson, Thermodynamic behavior of an ideal ferro- magnet, Phys. Rev. 102, 1230 (1956)

work page 1956
[6]

Oguchi, Theory of spin-wave interactions in ferro- and antiferromagnetism, Phys

T. Oguchi, Theory of spin-wave interactions in ferro- and antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. 117, 117 (1960)

work page 1960
[7]

A. L. Chernyshev and M. E. Zhitomirsky, Spin waves in a triangular lattice antiferromagnet: Decays, spec- trum renormalization, and singularities, Phys. Rev. B79, 144416 (2009)

2009
[8]

M. E. Zhitomirsky and A. L. Chernyshev, Colloquium: Spontaneous magnon decays, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 219 (2013)

work page 2013

Show all 41 references

[9]

J. S. Gardner, M. J. P. Gingras, and J. E. Greedan, Mag- netic pyrochlore oxides, Rev. Mod. Phys. 82, 53 (2010)

2010
[10]

Onose, T

Y. Onose, T. Ideue, H. Katsura, Y. Shiomi, N. Nagaosa, and Y. Tokura, Observation of the magnon hall effect, Science 329, 297 (2010)

2010
[11]

P. A. McClarty, Topological magnons: A review, Annual Review of Condensed Matter Physics 13, 171 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-031620- 104715

2022 doi
[12]

Malki and G

M. Malki and G. S. Uhrig, Topological magnetic excita- tions, Europhysics Letters 132, 20003 (2020)

2020
[13]

Kondo, Y

H. Kondo, Y. Akagi, and H. Katsura, Non-Hermiticity and topological invariants of magnon Bogoliubov–de Gennes systems, Progress of Theoretical and Experimen- tal Physics 2020, 10.1093/ptep/ptaa151 (2020)

2020 doi
[14]

A. L. Chernyshev and P. A. Maksimov, Damped topolog- ical magnons in the kagome-lattice ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 187203 (2016)

2016
[15]

S. S. Pershoguba, S. Banerjee, J. C. Lashley, J. Park, H. ˚Agren, G. Aeppli, and A. V. Balatsky, Dirac magnons in honeycomb ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. X 8, 011010 (2018)

2018
[16]

A. Mook, K. Plekhanov, J. Klinovaja, and D. Loss, Interaction-stabilized topological magnon insulator in ferromagnets, Phys. Rev. X 11, 021061 (2021)

2021
[17]

Y. Liu, L. Zhai, S. Yan, D. Wang, and X. Wan, Magnon- magnon interaction in monolayer mnbi 2te4, Phys. Rev. B 108, 174425 (2023)

2023
[18]

Chen, F.-J

Q.-H. Chen, F.-J. Huang, and Y.-P. Fu, Damped topo- logical magnons in honeycomb antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 108, 024409 (2023)

2023
[19]

Habel, A

J. Habel, A. Mook, J. Willsher, and J. Knolle, Breakdown of chiral edge modes in topological magnon insulators, Phys. Rev. B 109, 024441 (2024)

2024
[20]

H. Sun, D. Bhowmick, B. Yang, and P. Sengupta, In- teracting topological dirac magnons, Phys. Rev. B 107, 134426 (2023)

2023
[21]

Sourounis and A

K. Sourounis and A. Manchon, Impact of magnon in- teractions on transport in honeycomb antiferromagnets (2024), arXiv:2402.14572 [cond-mat.mes-hall]

2024 arXiv
[22]

Li, X.-W

Y.-M. Li, X.-W. Luo, and K. Chang, Temperature- induced magnonic chern insulator in collinear antiferro- magnets, Phys. Rev. B 107, 214417 (2023)

2023
[23]

J. G. Rau, R. Moessner, and P. A. McClarty, Magnon interactions in the frustrated pyrochlore ferromagnet yb2ti2o7, Phys. Rev. B 100, 104423 (2019)

2019
[24]

Hickey, D

A. Hickey, D. Lozano-G´ omez, and M. J. P. Gin- gras, Order-by-disorder without quantum zero-point fluctuations in the pyrochlore heisenberg ferromag- net with dzyaloshinskii-moriya interactions (2024), arXiv:2403.02391 [cond-mat.str-el]

2024 arXiv
[25]

Li and G

F.-Y. Li and G. Chen, Competing phases and topological excitations of spin-1 pyrochlore antiferromagnets, Phys. Rev. B 98, 045109 (2018)

2018
[26]

Laurell and G

P. Laurell and G. A. Fiete, Topological magnon bands and unconventional superconductivity in pyrochlore iri- date thin films, Phys. Rev. Lett. 118, 177201 (2017)

2017
[27]

Jian and W

S.-K. Jian and W. Nie, Weyl magnons in pyrochlore an- tiferromagnets with an all-in-all-out order, Phys. Rev. B 97, 115162 (2018)

2018
[28]

Hwang, N

K. Hwang, N. Trivedi, and M. Randeria, Topological magnons with nodal-line and triple-point degeneracies: Implications for thermal hall effect in pyrochlore iridates, Phys. Rev. Lett. 125, 047203 (2020)

2020
[29]

V. V. Jyothis, B. Patra, and V. R. Chandra, Magnon bands in pyrochlore slabs with heisenberg exchange and anisotropies, Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter 36, 185801 (2024)

2024
[30]

Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of “weak” fer- romagnetism of antiferromagnetics, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 4, 241 (1958)

I. Dzyaloshinsky, A thermodynamic theory of “weak” fer- romagnetism of antiferromagnetics, Journal of Physics and Chemistry of Solids 4, 241 (1958)

1958
[31]

Moriya, New mechanism of anisotropic superexchange interaction, Phys

T. Moriya, New mechanism of anisotropic superexchange interaction, Phys. Rev. Lett. 4, 228 (1960)

1960
[32]

Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism, Phys

T. Moriya, Anisotropic superexchange interaction and weak ferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. 120, 91 (1960)

1960
[33]

Moessner and J

R. Moessner and J. T. Chalker, Properties of a classical spin liquid: The heisenberg pyrochlore antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80, 2929 (1998)

1998
[34]

Moessner and J

R. Moessner and J. T. Chalker, Low-temperature prop- erties of classical geometrically frustrated antiferromag- nets, Phys. Rev. B 58, 12049 (1998)

1998
[35]

Elhajal, B

M. Elhajal, B. Canals, R. Sunyer, and C. Lacroix, Ordering in the pyrochlore antiferromagnet due to dzyaloshinsky-moriya interactions, Phys. Rev. B 71, 094420 (2005)

2005
[36]

J. M. Luttinger and L. Tisza, Theory of dipole interaction in crystals, Phys. Rev. 70, 954 (1946)

1946
[37]

Holstein and H

T. Holstein and H. Primakoff, Field dependence of the intrinsic domain magnetization of a ferromagnet, Phys. Rev. 58, 1098 (1940)

1940
[38]

Colpa, Diagonalization of the quadratic boson hamil- tonian, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Appli- cations 93, 327 (1978)

J. Colpa, Diagonalization of the quadratic boson hamil- tonian, Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Appli- cations 93, 327 (1978)

1978
[39]

A. L. Fetter and J. D. Walecka,Quantum theory of many- particle systems(New York (N.Y.) : McGraw-Hill, 1971)

1971
[40]

A. B. Harris, C. Kallin, and A. J. Berlinsky, Possible n´ eel orderings of the kagom´ e antiferromagnet, Phys. Rev. B 45, 2899 (1992)

1992
[41]

P. A. Maksimov and A. L. Chernyshev, Field-induced dynamical properties of the XXZ model on a honeycomb lattice, Phys. Rev. B 93, 014418 (2016)

2016

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.

[1] [1]

Bloch, Zur Theorie des Ferromagnetismus, Zeitschrift fur Physik 61, 206 (1930)

F. Bloch, Zur Theorie des Ferromagnetismus, Zeitschrift fur Physik 61, 206 (1930)

work page 1930

[2] [2]

P. W. Anderson, An approximate quantum theory of the antiferromagnetic ground state, Phys. Rev. 86, 694 9 (1952)

work page 1952

[3] [3]

Kubo, The spin-wave theory of antiferromagnetics, Phys

R. Kubo, The spin-wave theory of antiferromagnetics, Phys. Rev. 87, 568 (1952)

work page 1952

[4] [4]

F. J. Dyson, General theory of spin-wave interactions, Phys. Rev. 102, 1217 (1956)

work page 1956

[5] [5]

F. J. Dyson, Thermodynamic behavior of an ideal ferro- magnet, Phys. Rev. 102, 1230 (1956)

work page 1956

[6] [6]

Oguchi, Theory of spin-wave interactions in ferro- and antiferromagnetism, Phys

T. Oguchi, Theory of spin-wave interactions in ferro- and antiferromagnetism, Phys. Rev. 117, 117 (1960)

work page 1960

[7] [7]

A. L. Chernyshev and M. E. Zhitomirsky, Spin waves in a triangular lattice antiferromagnet: Decays, spec- trum renormalization, and singularities, Phys. Rev. B79, 144416 (2009)

2009

[8] [8]

M. E. Zhitomirsky and A. L. Chernyshev, Colloquium: Spontaneous magnon decays, Rev. Mod. Phys. 85, 219 (2013)

work page 2013