Pith. sign in

REVIEW 1 major objections 6 minor 1 cited by

Swift-XRT and NuSTAR Monitoring of Obscuration Variability in Mrk 477

T0 review · 1 major / 6 minor · reviewed 2026-08-07 · deepseek-v4-flash

Challenge this review Re-run · record.json Download PDF Read on arXiv ↗ Review JSON

Pith's one-line read Fifteen X-ray observations of Mrk 477 show its obscuring gas column changes in as little as two weeks, and pooled with 26 other sources the chance of catching obscuration variability rises from about 20% below 10 days to 60-70% beyond 5…

desk verdict New monitoring data and a plausible compiled trend, but the timescale claim needs a source-level robustness test before it carries the paper. read the letter →

arxiv 2502.09759 v1 pith:C7J7DWR3 submitted 2025-02-13 astro-ph.HE astro-ph.GA

N. Torres-Albà , Z. Hu , I. Cox , S. Marchesi , M. Ajello , A. Pizzetti , I. Pal , R. Silver
show 1 more author
X. Zhao
This is my paper · ORCID
classification astro-ph.HEastro-ph.GA
keywords obscurationvariabilitySeyfert2galaxyactivegalacticnucleiX-rayspectroscopytorusmodelbroad-lineregioncloudscolumndensityMrk477
verification ladder T0 review T1 audit T2 compute T3 formal

The pith

A machine-rendered reading of the paper's core claim, the machinery that carries it, and where it could break.

The reading

Mrk 477 is a nearby galaxy whose actively accreting supermassive black hole is seen through a veil of gas, and this paper asks whether that veil changes over time. It compiles 15 X-ray observations taken over 13 years with four telescopes and fits them simultaneously with self-consistent torus models, finding that the line-of-sight gas column oscillates between about $1.5$ and $7\times10^{23}\,{\rm cm}^{-2}$ and can change on timescales as short as two weeks. The paper also pools these data with 26 previously studied sources, roughly 350 observation pairs in total, and finds that the chance of seeing a change in obscuration grows from about 20% for observations less than 10 days apart to 60-70% for separations beyond five years. If this is right, single snapshot comparisons routinely underestimate how often obscured active galaxies are changing, and a small number of epochs is usually enough to catch variability. The authors argue the timescale trend points to torus-scale material as the main source of long-term obscuration changes, with broad-line-region clouds confined to the shortest separations.

What carries the argument

The argument runs on simultaneous X-ray spectral fitting with two self-consistent torus models: borus02, a homogeneous-reflector model, and UXCLUMPY, a clumpy-cloud model. All 15 spectra are fit together with the torus reflection parameters (covering factor, average torus column density, cloud-distribution width, inclination) and the photon index tied across epochs, while the line-of-sight column density $N_{\rm H,los}$ and a cross-normalization constant are free in each epoch; this design is what separates obscuration changes from intrinsic luminosity changes. The variability claim is then carried by a pair-counting statistic: across the 105 epoch pairs of Mrk 477 and about 350 pairs in the full 27-source sample, a pair counts as variable when its two $N_{\rm H,los}$ values are inconsistent at 90% confidence, and the fraction of such pairs is computed as a function of the time separation $\Delta t$.

What would settle it

Observe a moderately obscured (Compton-thin) active galaxy at five or more epochs spread over a decade with simultaneous soft and hard X-ray coverage, fitting each epoch with the torus reflection parameters free; if the covering factor, average column density, or photon index must vary to produce acceptable fits, the tied-parameter assumption fails and the reported variability fractions would need revision. For the BLR hypothesis, search for a fully sampled cloud eclipse lasting longer than about 300-500 days; if such an eclipse has an inferred cloud size below $10^{15}\,{\rm cm}$, it would contradict the paper's claim that only torus-scale material can explain long-timescale variability.

Watch

Extended reading notes

Core claim

The paper's central claim is that Mrk 477, a Seyfert 2 active nucleus viewed through obscuring gas, shows frequent line-of-sight column density variability, with $N_{\rm H,los}$ moving between roughly $1.5\times10^{23}$ and $7\times10^{23}\,{\rm cm}^{-2}$ and changes appearing on timescales down to about two weeks. Of the 105 pairs of observations, 42 are inconsistent at 90% confidence with a single column density, so the probability that two randomly drawn epochs disagree is about 40%; the chance of catching at least one variable pair rises to 78% with three observations and 95% with four. Combined with 26 other sources analyzed with the same method, the variable-pair fraction increases from about 20% at $\Delta t<10$ days to roughly 60-70% at $\Delta t>5$ years, while the average column change in variable pairs stays near $30{-}40\times10^{22}\,{\rm cm}^{-2}$ except for the shortest separations, where it drops to about $5\times10^{22}\,{\rm cm}^{-2}$. The paper further claims that this timescale dependence is difficult to explain if all obscuration variability comes from broad-line-region clouds, because above a cloud's crossing time the variability probability should become flat; matching the observed rise would require such clouds two to three orders of magnitude larger than previous measurements, so the data favor variability arising from torus-scale structure, with broad-line-region clouds possibly dominating only the $\Delta t<10$ day regime.

Load-bearing premise

The load-bearing premise is that the reflecting structure around the black hole and the intrinsic spectral shape stay completely unchanged across the 13 years, so every spectral difference between epochs must be assigned to the gas directly in front of the source; if the reflector itself evolves, some of that evolution would be misread as line-of-sight obscuration variability.

Editorial extensions

If this is right

  • With only two observations of a genuinely variable obscured active galaxy, the chance of seeing the variability is about 40%, so archival two-epoch comparisons systematically underreport obscuration variability.
  • Monitoring campaigns that obtain three or four epochs have a 78-95% chance of catching at least one variable pair, making modest campaigns a cost-effective way to identify variable sources.
  • Across the 27-source sample, the variable-pair fraction grows from about 20% at separations under 10 days to 60-70% beyond 5 years, implying that long-term obscuration variability is common among Compton-thin Seyfert 2 nuclei.
  • The average column change in variable pairs is roughly constant at $30{-}40\times10^{22}\,{\rm cm}^{-2}$ across timescales, except below 10 days where it drops to about $5\times10^{22}\,{\rm cm}^{-2}$, suggesting a distinct short-timescale population of low-column clouds.
  • The timescale dependence favors torus-scale material as the dominant source of obscuration variability, with broad-line-region clouds contributing mainly at the shortest separations.

Reading between the lines

Editorial extensions of the paper, not claims the author makes directly.

  • Beyond the paper: the rising variable-pair fraction with time implies that two-epoch 'changing-look' classifications separated by years will overstate how quickly or dramatically a source is transitioning, because the same source would likely show a different column if sampled again.
  • Beyond the paper: if the $\Delta t<10$ day regime is indeed dominated by broad-line-region clouds, rapid-cadence monitoring of Compton-thin Seyfert 2 galaxies should find frequent small-amplitude eclipses with $\Delta N_{\rm H,los}\sim5\times10^{22}\,{\rm cm}^{-2}$, a testable prediction the paper does not itself make.
  • Beyond the paper: applying the same pair-count statistic to the growing X-ray archive of other obscured active galaxies would test whether the >5-year variable-pair fraction continues to rise, and would show how much Mrk 477's dense monitoring skews the current sample.
  • Beyond the paper: the tied-reflection assumption could be stress-tested on sources with stronger reflection than Mrk 477, where torus geometry changes would leave clearer spectral signatures; if reflection variability turns out to be common, the derived $N_{\rm H,los}$ histories of all 27 sources would need to be re-fit.
Share X Bluesky LinkedIn Reddit HN

Signed reviews

No signed human review yet.

Editorial analysis

A structured set of objections, weighed in public.

Desk editor's note, referee report, and a circularity audit.

Referee Report

1 major / 6 minor

Summary. The paper presents a multi-epoch X-ray analysis of the Seyfert 2 galaxy Mrk 477, combining five archival observations (XMM-Newton, NuSTAR, Chandra) with two dedicated monitoring campaigns (five Swift-XRT and five NuSTAR epochs). All 15 epochs are fit simultaneously with two self-consistent torus models (borus02 and UXCLUMPY), with reflection parameters and the photon index tied across epochs while the line-of-sight column density NH,los and a cross-normalization are free per epoch. The authors report NH,los variability between multiple epoch pairs, including a claimed ~14-day change between two Swift-XRT observations, and estimate that 42 of the 105 Mrk 477 observation pairs (40%) are variable at 90% confidence. Combining these 105 pairs with ~245 pairs from 26 other sources analyzed in the authors' earlier papers, they find that the fraction of variable pairs increases from ~20% at Δt < 10 days to ~60–70% at Δt > 5 years. They interpret this timescale trend as evidence against BLR clouds being the sole origin of obscuration variability, unless the clouds are implausibly large.

Significance. If the sample-level timescale trend is robust, it provides a valuable empirical constraint on the origin and location of obscuring material in AGN, complementing small-number eclipsing-event studies such as Markowitz et al. (2014). The Mrk 477 monitoring campaign itself is a useful addition, and the paper has genuine strengths: it uses two independent torus models that cross-check the NH,los measurements, it explicitly tests the tied-reflection-parameter assumption by fitting archival+Swift and NuSTAR-only subsets separately (Appendix B), and it presents the fitted spectral components in detail. The main significance claim, however, is the trend in Fig. 6, and that claim currently rests on a statistical treatment of non-independent observation pairs that needs to be demonstrated to be robust.

major comments (1)
  1. [§5.2, Eq. (4) and derived probabilities] The quantity 42/105 = 40% is used both as the observed pair fraction and, after assuming all pairs are independent Bernoulli draws, to compute the probabilities 78% (3 observations) and 95% (4 observations). Pairs sharing an epoch are strongly correlated (a single observation appears in up to 14 pairs), so the effective sample size is far below 105 and the naive binomial variance underestimates the uncertainty. Please provide a clustering-aware estimate (e.g., bootstrap by epoch or by source) or explicitly label these numbers as descriptive fractions without formal probability claims.
minor comments (6)
  1. [Throughout] Typographical errors: §2.1 heading 'Data Analisys', §2.3 'arund', §1 'as longs as years', §4 'desnsity', §5.4 'perfomed', and the text near Eq. (1) 'Bremmstrahlung' should be corrected.
  2. [Fig. 6] The binned fractions would be much easier to interpret with binomial error bars (e.g., Wilson intervals), and the Mrk 477-only curve should either be overlaid in a separate panel or have its contribution to each bin indicated so that the reader can see the weighting directly.
  3. [Table 4] The notation in the table footnote ('NH,inst.,num.') does not match the table's column headers (e.g., NH,swift1, Cnus3); please align the notation used in the text, the table, and the footnote.
  4. [§5.2] The statement that 'this statistical approach is not valid when looking at a single source' for Mrk 477 is puzzling because the same pair-counting approach is applied to the full sample in the same section; please clarify why pair non-independence is deemed acceptable for the sample-level estimate but not for the single-source estimate.
  5. [Fig. 7 caption] The in-text citation 'Gravity Collaboration et al. 2023' does not match the reference list entry 'Gravity Collaboration, Amorim, A., Bourdarot, G., et al. 2023'; please standardize the citation format.
  6. [Abstract and §5.2] The abstract's '40%, 78% and 95%' probabilities should carry an explicit caveat that they assume independent pairs; as written, they appear as exact probabilities rather than as descriptive fractions derived from a correlated dataset.

Circularity Check

0 steps flagged · score 0.0 of 10

No significant circularity: the variability statistics are descriptive summaries of the spectral fits, and the BLR test is an external consistency check.

full rationale

The paper's derivation chain is descriptive and data-driven rather than predictive: NH,los values are fitted per epoch (Table 4), and the claimed 'probabilities' are fractions of observation pairs whose 90% confidence contours do not overlap (Sect. 5.2), so the central variability statistics are summaries of the fit, not predictions forced by construction. The tied reflection parameters (Cf, NH,av, sigma_tor, theta_obs, Gamma) are an explicit assumption that is tested in Appendix B by splitting the data into archival+Swift and NuSTAR-only subsets; the test is a consistency check, not a circular validation. The BLR-cloud discussion (Sect. 5.3) infers a crossing time from the observed trend and computes implied cloud sizes, then compares them to external measurements (Maiolino et al. 2010; GRAVITY), which is a physical consistency argument rather than a reduction to the paper's inputs. Self-citations to earlier group papers supply additional data points and methodological continuity, but no load-bearing step invokes an unverified uniqueness theorem or defines a result in terms of itself. The acknowledged clustering of Mrk 477 pairs in Fig. 6 is a statistical limitation (pseudo-replication), not a circularity, and the paper flags it explicitly.

Assumptions & free parameters 8 free parameters · 6 assumptions · 0 invented entities

The central variability result rests on the fitted N_H,los values and the cross-normalizations, while the torus geometry claims depend on the reflection model parameters. The main axioms are the validity of the torus models and the constancy of the reflection parameters and photon index. No new physical entities are introduced.

free parameters (8)
  • N_H,los per epoch (15 values) = 0.17-0.75 x 10^24 cm^-2 (borus02 full fit)
    Line-of-sight column density fitted separately for each of the 15 observations; these values are the direct basis for all variability claims.
  • C_norm per epoch (14 values) = 0.85-1.42 (borus02 and UXCLUMPY)
    Cross-normalization constants allowing intrinsic flux variability relative to the Chandra epoch; they trade off against N_H,los and enlarge its uncertainties.
  • Photon index Gamma = 1.54+0.05-0.06 (borus02), 1.78+0.03-0.03 (UXCLUMPY)
    Power-law slope of the intrinsic AGN continuum, tied across epochs; model-dependent and degenerate with reflector shape.
  • Torus covering factor Cf = 1.00 (+0 -0.08)
    borus02 covering factor, at the hard bound of the allowed range.
  • Average torus column density N_H,av = 0.08+0.02-0.02 x 10^24 cm^-2
    borus02 average torus column density; key to the 'large covering factor, low column density' description.
  • Cloud distribution width sigma_tor = 84.0 deg (UXCLUMPY)
    Width of Gaussian cloud distribution, at the upper bound; drives the torus geometry claim.
  • Soft emission temperature kT and Gaussian line energy = kT~0.29 keV, Eline~0.91 keV
    Parameters of the soft excess and soft line, tied across epochs.
  • Scattering fraction Fs = 2.8e-2 (borus02), 20.6e-2 (UXCLUMPY)
    Fraction of scattered continuum; model-dependent.
assumptions (6)
  • domain assumption borus02 and UXCLUMPY torus models accurately represent the reflection and transmission spectra of Mrk 477
    Invoked in Section 3; the entire N_H,los determination depends on these model tables.
  • domain assumption Torus reflection parameters (Cf, N_H,av, sigma_tor, theta_obs) do not vary across the ~13-year observing span
    Stated in Section 3 and tested in Appendix B against two dataset splits; if false, the joint fit can distort N_H,los.
  • domain assumption Intrinsic photon index Gamma is constant over all epochs
    Assumed in Section 3 with 'we also assume that the photon index, Gamma, of the main powerlaw emission does not vary'; Appendix B offers a consistency check but not a proof.
  • domain assumption Galactic absorption, solar abundances, and Ecut=300 keV are fixed to literature values
    Fixed in Section 2 and 3; Ecut is from Balokovic et al. 2020 population results.
  • ad hoc to paper Non-overlap of 90% confidence intervals is a valid criterion for pair variability
    Used in Section 5.1-5.2 to count 42 of 105 pairs as variable; the threshold is a statistical convention, and the resulting probabilities are sensitive to it.
  • ad hoc to paper Observation pairs within a source are treated as independent draws for the probability calculations
    Used to compute 40%, 78%, 95% probabilities and the sample fractions in Fig. 6; the paper explicitly acknowledges this is invalid for the single-source analysis (Section 5.2) but still applies it to the combined sample.

how reviews work

0 comments
Cite this review

Pith. "Pith review of Swift-XRT and NuSTAR Monitoring of Obscuration Variability in Mrk 477." pith.science (2026). https://pith.science/paper/C7J7DWR3

@misc{pith2026250209759,
  author       = {Pith},
  title        = {Pith review of: Swift-XRT and NuSTAR Monitoring of Obscuration Variability in Mrk 477},
  year         = {2026},
  howpublished = {\url{https://pith.science/paper/C7J7DWR3}},
  note         = {Machine review of arXiv:2502.09759}
}
abstract

We present the analysis of 15 X-ray observations of Mrk 477, a nearby Seyfert 2 active galactic nucleus, with the objective to monitor its obscuring column density variability. The full dataset consists of five archival observations, split into two XMM-Newton, two NuSTAR and one Chandra observation, plus two dedicated monitoring campaigns. The monitoring campaigns were performed with Swift-XRT and NuSTAR, containing five observations each. We performed a simultaneous analysis using self-consistent torus models, deriving geometric properties of the torus as well as the obscuration along the line of sight. Mrk 477 is best modeled with a torus with large covering factor yet low column density (on average). Its line of sight column density oscillates between $1.5-7\times10^{23}$~cm$^{-2}$. Mrk~477 presents frequent obscuring column density variability, on timescales as short as $\sim2$~weeks. The probability of drawing a pair of obscuration-variable observations for Mrk~477 when having 2, 3, and 4 observations is 40\%, 78\% and 95\%, respectively. Adding the results of this work to those of another 26 sources, we find a trend of increasing obscuration variability with time (from $\sim20$\% at $\Delta t<10$~days, to $\sim60-70$\% at timescales larger than 5 years). We discuss whether this is compatible with the majority of obscuration variability coming from broad line region clouds.

Figures

Figures reproduced from arXiv: 2502.09759 by the authors.

Figure 1
Figure 1. Flux (top) and Hardness Ratio (bottom) as a function of time for the Swift-XRT campaign, showing all observations taken, as described in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p004_1.png] view at source ↗
Figure 2
Figure 2. Top: Chandra spectrum of Mrk 477, one of the 15 observations fit simultaneously in this work. Top Left: borus02 fit to the spectrum, showing the subcomponents listed in Eq. 2 (reflected, transmitted or line-of-sight, and scattered emission). Top Right: UXCLUMPY fit to the spectrum, showing the subcomponents listed in Eq. 3 (where the reflected and transmitted components are one single table, with the scattering comp… view at source ↗
Figure 3
Figure 3. NH,los and Cnorm variability as a function of time, for borus02 (left) and UXCLUMPY (right). The NH,los is compared to NH,av (shaded area) as determined by borus02 in all panels. observations, first and last NuSTAR observations) show NH,los variability. The agreement between borus02 and UXCLUMPY is remarkable, with some minor differ￾ences. A few of the NH,los values for UXCLUMPY are slightly lower, while Cnorm value… view at source ↗
Figures from the paper (8 more)
Figure 4
Figure 4. Figure 4: 90% confidence contours of NH,los versus Cnorm for the whole dataset, as fit by borus02. The thick, colored lines go from the best-fit value of one observation into the the best-fit value of the following observation, in chronological order. The legend shows the ∆t bet…
Figure 5
Figure 5. Figure 5: Same as [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p010_5.png]
Figure 6
Figure 6. Figure 6: Left: Fraction of observation pairs with incompatible NH,los (at 90% confidence) as a function of the time separation between observations. The data shown in blue includes all sources within the parent sample analyzed so far (27 sources, split into Pizzetti et al. 2022…
Figure 7
Figure 7. Figure 7: BLR cloud sizes as a function of radial distance, computed under the assumption of two different MSMBH and a cloud crossing time of tcross =300 d (blue) and tcross =500 d (red). The black shaded area corresponds to a ‘forbidden re￾gion’, an area removed from the plot a…
Figure 8
Figure 8. Figure 8: All observations used in this work, except for the Chandra observation already shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p019_8.png]
Figure 9
Figure 9. Figure 9: All observations used in this work, except for the Chandra observation already shown in [PITH_FULL_IMAGE:figures/full_fig_p021_9.png]
Figure 10
Figure 10. Figure 10: Confidence contours (at 1σ, 2σ and 3σ) for the width of the torus cloud distribution (left), and inclination angle (right), against the photon index, for the UXCLUMPY model. The different colors represent the different datasets used to test the hypothesis that the ref…
Figure 11
Figure 11. Figure 11: Confidence contours (at 1σ, 2σ and 3σ) for the width of the cloud distribution (top left), covering factor (top right), and inclination angle (bottom), against the photon index, for the borus02 model. The different colors represent the different datasets used to test …

Discussion (0). Continue with ORCID to comment.

Forward citations

Cited by 1 Pith paper

Reviewed papers in the Pith corpus that reference this work. Sorted by Pith novelty score. Full citation record

  1. X-ray Absorption Variability in NGC 1142: Another Constraint on the Nature of the Torus/Broad-Line Region in Active Galactic Nuclei

    astro-ph.GA 2026-07 conditional novelty 4.5 of 10

    NGC 1142’s NH varies across nine epochs; detection probability scales with observation count, and simple cloud simulations favor many simultaneous eclipsing clouds.

Reference graph

Works this paper leans on

62 extracted references · 18 canonical work pages · cited by 1 Pith paper

  1. [1]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archiveprefix author booktitle chapter edition editor howpublished institution eprint journal key month note number organization pages publisher school series title type volume year label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts #0 'before.all := #1 ...

  2. [2]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION n.dashify 't := "" t empty not t #1 #1 substring "-" = t #1 #2 substring "--" = not "--" * t #2 global.max substring 't := t #1 #1 substring "-" = "-" * t #2 global.max substring 't := while if t #1 #1 substring * t #2 global.max substring 't := if while FUNCTION word.in bbl.in " " * FUNCTION format....

  3. [3]

    , " * write output.state after.block = add.period write newline

    ENTRY address archivePrefix author booktitle chapter doi edition editor eprint howpublished institution journal key month number organization pages publisher school series title misctitle type volume year version url label extra.label sort.label short.list INTEGERS output.state before.all mid.sentence after.sentence after.block FUNCTION init.state.consts ...

  4. [4]

    write newline

    " write newline "" before.all 'output.state := FUNCTION format.url url empty "" new.block "" url * "" * if FUNCTION format.eprint eprint empty "" archivePrefix empty "" archivePrefix "arXiv" = new.block " " eprint * " " * new.block " " eprint * " " * if if if FUNCTION format.doi doi empty "" " " doi * " " * if FUNCTION format.pid doi empty eprint empty ""...

  5. [5]

    - [1] #1 = = ^ ^ ^ .\!\!^ d .\!\!^ h .\!\!^ m .\!\!^ s .\!\!^ @mss

    thebibliography [1] 20pt to REFERENCES 6pt =0pt 10pt plus 3pt =0pt =0pt =1pt plus 1pt =0pt =0pt -12pt =13pt plus 1pt =20pt =13pt plus 1pt \@M =10000 =-1.0em =0pt =0pt 0pt =0pt =1.0em @enumiv\@empty 10000 10000 `\.\@m \@noitemerr \@latex@warning Empty `thebibliography' environment \@ifnextchar \@reference \@latexerr Missing key on reference command Each re...

    2019

  6. [6]

    L., Georgakakis , A., et al

    Aird , J., Coil , A. L., Georgakakis , A., et al. 2015, , 451, 1892, 10.1093/mnras/stv1062

    doi:10.1093/mnras/stv1062 2015

  7. [7]

    1989, , 53, 197, 10.1016/0016-7037(89)90286-X

    Anders , E., & Grevesse , N. 1989, , 53, 197, 10.1016/0016-7037(89)90286-X

    doi:10.1016/0016-7037(89)90286-x 1989

  8. [8]

    Arnaud , K. A. 1996, in Astronomical Society of the Pacific Conference Series, Vol. 101, Astronomical Data Analysis Software and Systems V, ed. G. H. Jacoby & J. Barnes , 17

    1996

Show all 62 references
  1. [9]

    A., et al

    Balokovi \' c , M., Brightman, M., Harrison, F. A., et al. 2018, The Astrophysical Journal, 854, 42, 10.3847/1538-4357/aaa7eb

    2018 doi

  2. [10]

    A., Madejski , G., et al

    Balokovi \'c , M., Harrison , F. A., Madejski , G., et al. 2020, , 905, 41, 10.3847/1538-4357/abc342

    2020 doi

  3. [11]

    2009, , 695, 781, 10.1088/0004-637X/695/1/781

    Bianchi , S., Piconcelli , E., Chiaberge , M., et al. 2009, , 695, 781, 10.1088/0004-637X/695/1/781

    2009 doi

  4. [12]

    G., Torres-Alb \`a , N., Annuar , A., et al

    Boorman , P. G., Torres-Alb \`a , N., Annuar , A., et al. 2024, Frontiers in Astronomy and Space Sciences, 11, 1335459, 10.3389/fspas.2024.1335459

    2024

  5. [13]

    Buchner , J., Brightman , M., Nandra , K., Nikutta , R., & Bauer , F. E. 2019, , 629, A16, 10.1051/0004-6361/201834771

    2019 doi

  6. [14]

    2015, , 802, 89, 10.1088/0004-637X/802/2/89

    Buchner , J., Georgakakis , A., Nandra , K., et al. 2015, , 802, 89, 10.1088/0004-637X/802/2/89

    2015 doi

  7. [15]

    N., Hill , J

    Burrows , D. N., Hill , J. E., Nousek , J. A., et al. 2005, , 120, 165, 10.1007/s11214-005-5097-2

    2005 doi

  8. [16]

    S., Torres-Alb \`a , N., Marchesi , S., et al

    Cox , I. S., Torres-Alb \`a , N., Marchesi , S., et al. 2023, , 958, 155, 10.3847/1538-4357/ad014e

    2023 doi

  9. [17]

    2004, , 615, L25, 10.1086/424380

    Elvis , M., Risaliti , G., Nicastro , F., et al. 2004, , 615, L25, 10.1086/424380

    2004 doi

  10. [18]

    C., Allen, G

    Fruscione, A., McDowell, J. C., Allen, G. E., et al. 2006, in Observatory Operations: Strategies, Processes, and Systems, ed. D. R. Silva & R. E. Doxsey, Vol. 6270, International Society for Optics and Photonics (SPIE), 586 -- 597, 10.1117/12.671760

    2006 doi

  11. [19]

    2023, , 669, A14, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244655

    Gravity Collaboration , Amorim , A., Bourdarot , G., et al. 2023, , 669, A14, 10.1051/0004-6361/202244655

    2023 doi

  12. [20]

    Guainazzi , M., La Parola , V., Miniutti , G., Segreto , A., & Longinotti , A. L. 2012, , 547, A31, 10.1051/0004-6361/201219946

    2012 doi

  13. [21]

    A., Craig , W

    Harrison , F. A., Craig , W. W., Christensen , F. E., et al. 2013, , 770, 103, 10.1088/0004-637X/770/2/103

    2013 doi

  14. [22]

    M., Gonz \'a lez-Delgado , R., Leitherer , C., et al

    Heckman , T. M., Gonz \'a lez-Delgado , R., Leitherer , C., et al. 1997, , 482, 114, 10.1086/304139

    1997 doi

  15. [23]

    2015, , 579, A90, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526127

    Hern \'a ndez-Garc \' a , L., Masegosa , J., Gonz \'a lez-Mart \' n , O., & M \'a rquez , I. 2015, , 579, A90, 10.1051/0004-6361/201526127

    2015 doi

  16. [24]

    2017, , 844, 21, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7891

    Ichikawa , K., & Tazaki , R. 2017, , 844, 21, 10.3847/1538-4357/aa7891

    2017 doi

  17. [25]

    C., Ciroi , S., & Rafanelli , P

    Ilic , D., Popovic , L. C., Ciroi , S., & Rafanelli , P. 2008, in Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica Conference Series, Vol. 32, Revista Mexicana de Astronomia y Astrofisica Conference Series, 102--102

    2008

  18. [26]

    B., Radeva , Y., et al

    Jahoda , K., Markwardt , C. B., Radeva , Y., et al. 2006, , 163, 401, 10.1086/500659

    2006 doi

  19. [27]

    2001, , 365, L1, 10.1051/0004-6361:20000036

    Jansen , F., Lumb , D., Altieri , B., et al. 2001, , 365, L1, 10.1051/0004-6361:20000036

    2001 doi

  20. [28]

    Kalberla , P. M. W., Burton , W. B., Hartmann , D., et al. 2005, , 440, 775, 10.1051/0004-6361:20041864

    2005 doi

  21. [29]

    2023, , 522, 4098, 10.1093/mnras/stad1216

    Kayal , A., Singh , V., Ricci , C., et al. 2023, , 522, 4098, 10.1093/mnras/stad1216

    2023 doi

  22. [30]

    G., Krumpe , M., et al

    Laha , S., Markowitz , A. G., Krumpe , M., et al. 2020, , 897, 66, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab92ab

    2020 doi

  23. [31]

    2010, , 517, A47, 10.1051/0004-6361/200913985

    Maiolino , R., Risaliti , G., Salvati , M., et al. 2010, , 517, A47, 10.1051/0004-6361/200913985

    2010 doi

  24. [32]

    2012, , 421, 1803, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20445.x

    Marchese , E., Braito , V., Della Ceca , R., Caccianiga , A., & Severgnini , P. 2012, , 421, 1803, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2012.20445.x

    2012

  25. [33]

    2019, , 872, 8, 10.3847/1538-4357/aafbeb

    Marchesi , S., Ajello , M., Zhao , X., et al. 2019, , 872, 8, 10.3847/1538-4357/aafbeb

    2019 doi

  26. [34]

    2022, , 935, 114, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac80be

    Marchesi , S., Zhao , X., Torres-Alb \`a , N., et al. 2022, , 935, 114, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac80be

    2022 doi

  27. [35]

    G., Krumpe , M., & Nikutta , R

    Markowitz , A. G., Krumpe , M., & Nikutta , R. 2014, , 439, 1403, 10.1093/mnras/stt2492

    2014 doi

  28. [36]

    2014, , 437, 1776, 10.1093/mnras/stt2005

    Miniutti , G., Sanfrutos , M., Beuchert , T., et al. 2014, , 437, 1776, 10.1093/mnras/stt2005

    2014 doi

  29. [37]

    L., Naddaf , M.-H., Zaja c ek , M., et al

    M \"u ller , A. L., Naddaf , M.-H., Zaja c ek , M., et al. 2022, , 931, 39, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac660a

    2022 doi

  30. [38]

    2002, , 570, L9, 10.1086/340857

    Nenkova , M., Ivezi \'c , Z ., & Elitzur , M. 2002, , 570, L9, 10.1086/340857

    2002 doi

  31. [39]

    M., Nikutta , R., Ivezi \'c , Z ., & Elitzur , M

    Nenkova , M., Sirocky , M. M., Nikutta , R., Ivezi \'c , Z ., & Elitzur , M. 2008, , 685, 160, 10.1086/590483

    2008 doi

  32. [40]

    2015, , 53, 365, 10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122302

    Netzer , H. 2015, , 53, 365, 10.1146/annurev-astro-082214-122302

    2015 doi

  33. [41]

    2022, , 936, 149, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac86c6

    Pizzetti , A., Torres-Alb \`a , N., Marchesi , S., et al. 2022, , 936, 149, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac86c6

    2022 doi

  34. [42]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.06919, 10.48550/arXiv.2403.06919

    Pizzetti , A., Torres-Alba , N., Marchesi , S., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2403.06919, 10.48550/arXiv.2403.06919

    2024 doi arXiv

  35. [43]

    2007, , 377, 607, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11634.x

    Puccetti , S., Fiore , F., Risaliti , G., et al. 2007, , 377, 607, 10.1111/j.1365-2966.2007.11634.x

    2007

  36. [44]

    A., et al

    Ramos Almeida , C., Alonso-Herrero , A., Levenson , N. A., et al. 2014, , 439, 3847, 10.1093/mnras/stu235

    2014 doi

  37. [45]

    2023, , 669, L5, 10.1051/0004-6361/202245409

    Ramos Almeida , C., Esparza-Arredondo , D., Gonz \'a lez-Mart \' n , O., et al. 2023, , 669, L5, 10.1051/0004-6361/202245409

    2023 doi

  38. [46]

    2023, , 945, 55, 10.3847/1538-4357/acb5a6

    Ricci , C., & Paltani , S. 2023, , 945, 55, 10.3847/1538-4357/acb5a6

    2023 doi

  39. [47]

    J., et al

    Ricci , C., Ueda , Y., Koss , M. J., et al. 2015, , 815, L13, 10.1088/2041-8205/815/1/L13

    2015 doi

  40. [48]

    E., Arevalo , P., et al

    Ricci , C., Bauer , F. E., Arevalo , P., et al. 2016, , 820, 5, 10.3847/0004-637X/820/1/5

    2016 doi

  41. [49]

    2005, , 623, L93, 10.1086/430252

    Risaliti , G., Elvis , M., Fabbiano , G., Baldi , A., & Zezas , A. 2005, , 623, L93, 10.1086/430252

    2005 doi

  42. [50]

    2002, , 571, 234, 10.1086/324146

    Risaliti , G., Elvis , M., & Nicastro , F. 2002, , 571, 234, 10.1086/324146

    2002 doi

  43. [51]

    2009, , 393, L1, 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00580.x

    Risaliti , G., Salvati , M., Elvis , M., et al. 2009, , 393, L1, 10.1111/j.1745-3933.2008.00580.x

    2009

  44. [52]

    2015, , 815, 55, 10.1088/0004-637X/815/1/55

    Rivers , E., Balokovi \'c , M., Ar \'e valo , P., et al. 2015, , 815, 55, 10.1088/0004-637X/815/1/55

    2015 doi

  45. [53]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.02878, 10.48550/arXiv.2410.02878

    Sengupta , D., Torres-Alb \`a , N., Pizzetti , A., et al. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2410.02878, 10.48550/arXiv.2410.02878

    2024 doi arXiv

  46. [54]

    N., et al

    Serafinelli , R., Braito , V., Reeves , J. N., et al. 2023, , 672, A10, 10.1051/0004-6361/202245224

    2023 doi

  47. [55]

    2019, , 877, 95, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1b20

    Tanimoto , A., Ueda , Y., Odaka , H., et al. 2019, , 877, 95, 10.3847/1538-4357/ab1b20

    2019 doi

  48. [56]

    2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.09781, 10.48550/arXiv.2411.09781

    Titarchuk , L., Seifina , E., & Mishin , Y. 2024, arXiv e-prints, arXiv:2411.09781, 10.48550/arXiv.2411.09781

    2024 doi arXiv

  49. [57]

    2023, , 678, A154, 10.1051/0004-6361/202345947

    Torres-Alb \`a , N., Marchesi , S., Zhao , X., et al. 2023, , 678, A154, 10.1051/0004-6361/202345947

    2023 doi

  50. [58]

    2021, , 922, 252, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1c73

    ---. 2021, , 922, 252, 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1c73

    2021 doi

  51. [59]

    M., & Padovani , P

    Urry , C. M., & Padovani , P. 1995, , 107, 803, 10.1086/133630

    1995 doi

  52. [60]

    2023, , 674, A123, 10.1051/0004-6361/202245783

    Vander Meulen , B., Camps , P., Stalevski , M., & Baes , M. 2023, , 674, A123, 10.1051/0004-6361/202245783

    2023 doi

  53. [61]

    A., Ferland , G

    Verner , D. A., Ferland , G. J., Korista , K. T., & Yakovlev , D. G. 1996, , 465, 487, 10.1086/177435

    1996 doi

  54. [62]

    2021, , 650, A57, 10.1051/0004-6361/202140297

    Zhao , X., Marchesi , S., Ajello , M., et al. 2021, , 650, A57, 10.1051/0004-6361/202140297

    2021 doi

Pith tools

Reviewed August 7, 2026 · model on record in the stance chip above.